Search

With the success of immunotherapy in cancer, understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) has become increasingly important; however in pediatric brain tumors this remains poorly characterized. Accordingly, we developed a clinical immune-oncology gene expression assay and used it to profile a diverse range of 1382 samples with detailed clinical and molecular annotation. In low-grade gliomas we identify distinct patterns of immune activation with prognostic significance in BRAF V600E-mutant tumors. In high-grade gliomas, we observe immune activation and T-cell infiltrates in tumors that have historically been considered immune cold, as well as genomic correlates of inflammation levels. In mismatch repair deficient high-grade gliomas, we find that high tumor inflammation signature is a significant predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibition, and demonstrate the potential for multimodal biomarkers to improve treatment stratification. Importantly, while overall patterns of immune activation are observed for histologically and genetically defined tumor types, there is significant variability within each entity, indicating that the TIME must be evaluated as an independent feature from diagnosis. In sum, in addition to the histology and molecular profile, this work underscores the importance of reporting on the TIME as an essential axis of cancer diagnosis in the era of personalized medicine., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) syndrome is a rare and aggressive cancer predisposition syndrome. Because a scarcity of data on this condition contributes to management challenges and poor outcomes, we aimed to describe the clinical spectrum, cancer biology, and impact of genetics on patient survival in CMMRD., Methods: In this cohort study, we collected cross-sectional and longitudinal data on all patients with CMMRD, with no age limits, registered with the International Replication Repair Deficiency Consortium (IRRDC) across more than 50 countries. Clinical data were extracted from the IRRDC database, medical records, and physician-completed case record forms. The primary objective was to describe the clinical features, cancer spectrum, and biology of the condition. Secondary objectives included estimations of cancer incidence and of the impact of the specific mismatch-repair gene and genotype on cancer onset and survival, including after cancer surveillance and immunotherapy interventions., Findings: We analysed data from 201 patients (103 males, 98 females) enrolled between June 5, 2007 and Sept 9, 2022. Median age at diagnosis of CMMRD or a related cancer was 8·9 years (IQR 5·9-12·6), and median follow-up from diagnosis was 7·2 years (3·6-14·8). Endogamy among minorities and closed communities contributed to high homozygosity within countries with low consanguinity. Frequent dermatological manifestations (117 [93%] of 126 patients with complete data) led to a clinical overlap with neurofibromatosis type 1 (35 [28%] of 126). 339 cancers were reported in 194 (97%) of 201 patients. The cumulative cancer incidence by age 18 years was 90% (95% CI 80-99). Median time between cancer diagnoses for patients with more than one cancer was 1·9 years (IQR 0·8-3·9). Neoplasms developed in 15 organs and included early-onset adult cancers. CNS tumours were the most frequent (173 [51%] cancers), followed by gastrointestinal (75 [22%]), haematological (61 [18%]), and other cancer types (30 [9%]). Patients with CNS tumours had the poorest overall survival rates (39% [95% CI 30-52] at 10 years from diagnosis; log-rank p<0·0001 across four cancer types), followed by those with haematological cancers (67% [55-82]), gastrointestinal cancers (89% [81-97]), and other solid tumours (96% [88-100]). All cancers showed high mutation and microsatellite indel burdens, and pathognomonic mutational signatures. MLH1 or MSH2 variants caused earlier cancer onset than PMS2 or MSH6 variants, and inferior survival (overall survival at age 15 years 63% [95% CI 55-73] for PMS2, 49% [35-68] for MSH6, 19% [6-66] for MLH1, and 0% for MSH2; p<0·0001). Frameshift or truncating variants within the same gene caused earlier cancers and inferior outcomes compared with missense variants (p<0·0001). The greater deleterious effects of MLH1 and MSH2 variants as compared with PMS2 and MSH6 variants persisted despite overall improvements in survival after surveillance or immune checkpoint inhibitor interventions., Interpretation: The very high cancer burden and unique genomic landscape of CMMRD highlight the benefit of comprehensive assays in timely diagnosis and precision approaches toward surveillance and immunotherapy. These data will guide the clinical management of children and patients who survive into adulthood with CMMRD., Funding: The Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Stand Up to Cancer, Children's Oncology Group National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Canadian Cancer Society, Brain Canada, The V Foundation for Cancer Research, BioCanRx, Harry and Agnieszka Hall, Meagan's Walk, BRAINchild Canada, The LivWise Foundation, St Baldrick Foundation, Hold'em for Life, and Garron Family Cancer Center., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests ALa reports payment from Alexion, support from Servier and stock from Gilead, outside of the submitted work. AV is co-lead role of the Consortium for Childhood Cancer Predisposition, outside of the submitted work. BH reports payment and stock from Invitae, outside of the submitted work. BC reports participation as data safety and monitoring board member in ReRad Study, participation in the chapter advisory board for Make a Wish Canada Nova Scotia, and participation in the medical advisory committee for Make a Wish Canada, outside of the submitted work. CCP reports grants from St Baldrick's Foundation, outside of the submitted work. DSZ reports consulting fees for Bayer, AstraZeneca, Accendatech, Novartis, Day One, FivePhusion, Alexion, Amgen, and Norgine, outside of the submitted work. DTB reports grants from MSD and Novocure, consulting fees from Nanocarry Therapeutics and Servier, and payment from Servier, outside of the submitted work. EO reports payment and support from Alexion for educational event, outside of the submitted work. EB reports grants from Roche and board participation for Novartis, Alexion and Gilead, outside of the submitted work. FC reports grants from Hall Hunter Foundation (UK), outside of the submitted work. HBF reports payments from Illumina and Sanofi Genzyme, support from Illumina, participation as scientific advisory committee for Sanofi Genzyme, International Gaucher Alliance and Igentify, stock from Igentify, and receipt of materials from Illumina, outside of the submitted work. IW reports grants from Chimerix and payment from COG Partners, outside of the submitted work. IS reports grants from Fondation Saint-Luc and FNRS-CDR, outside of the submitted work. JK reports other financial interests at Servier and PRA Health Sciences, outside of the submitted work. JRG-S reports participation on the board of the Philippine Society of Pediatric Oncology and Philippine Board of Pediatric Oncology, and stock in Macrogenics, Moderna, Mirati Therapeutics, CRISPR Therapeutics, Repligen, Quidelortho, and Shockwave Medical, outside of the submitted work. KJB reports consulting fees from US WorldMeds, Springworks Therapeutics, Alexion, and YmAbs, and payment from Alexion, outside of the submitted work. MS reports grants and support from the Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund, participation as a data safety and monitoring board member for clinical trial NCT05230758, and participation in the Swedish Pediatric CNS tumour group, outside of the submitted work. MAC reports financial support from SUNY Upstate Department of Pediatrics and board participation for Paige's Butterfly Run, outside of the submitted work. MO reports payment from Aptitude Health and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Ultragenyx and Abeona, outside of the submitted works. MZ reports payment and support from and board participation for AstraZeneca. NW reports grants from CANSEARCH Foundation, Childhood Cancer Research Switzerland, and the Foundation for Children and Adolescents with Cancer; payment, support, and advisory board participation for Swedish Orphan Biovitrum; and board participation for Childhood Cancer Switzerland, outside of the submitted work. NH reports grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and board participation for Incyte and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work. PCN reports grants from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Foundation, US Department of Defense, and Garron Family Cancer Centre, outside of the submitted work. RP reports participation in the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer, outside of the submitted work. RT reports consulting fees from Fennec Pharmaceuticals and Day One Biopharmaceuticals and payment from Fennec Pharmaceuticals, outside of the submitted work. SS reports payments from Sanofi Pharmaceuticals and Mylan Pharmaceutical, and board participation for Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, outside of the submitted work. SB reports consulting fees from Hoffmann-La Roche, YmAbs, MAP Biopharma and SERB SAS, and payment from Zschimmer & Schwarz Mohsdorf, outside of the submitted work. UI reports board participation in Pakistan Society of Pediatric Oncology, outside of the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is effective for replication-repair-deficient, high-grade gliomas (RRD-HGG). The clinical/biological impact of immune-directed approaches after failing ICI monotherapy is unknown. We performed an international study on 75 patients treated with anti-PD-1; 20 are progression free (median follow-up, 3.7 years). After second progression/recurrence (n = 55), continuing ICI-based salvage prolonged survival to 11.6 months (n = 38; P < 0.001), particularly for those with extreme mutation burden (P = 0.03). Delayed, sustained responses were observed, associated with changes in mutational spectra and the immune microenvironment. Response to reirradiation was explained by an absence of deleterious postradiation indel signatures (ID8). CTLA4 expression increased over time, and subsequent CTLA4 inhibition resulted in response/stable disease in 75%. RAS-MAPK-pathway inhibition led to the reinvigoration of peripheral immune and radiologic responses. Local (flare) and systemic immune adverse events were frequent (biallelic mismatch-repair deficiency > Lynch syndrome). We provide a mechanistic rationale for the sustained benefit in RRD-HGG from immune-directed/synergistic salvage therapies. Future approaches need to be tailored to patient and tumor biology., Significance: Hypermutant RRD-HGG are susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors beyond initial progression, leading to improved survival when reirradiation and synergistic immune/targeted agents are added. This is driven by their unique biological and immune properties, which evolve over time. Future research should focus on combinatorial regimens that increase patient survival while limiting immune toxicity. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 201., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Non-nutritive sweeteners are popular food additives owing to their low caloric density and powerful sweetness relative to natural sugars. Their lack of metabolism contributes to evidence proclaiming their safety, yet several studies contradict this, demonstrating that sweeteners activate sweet taste G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and elicit deleterious metabolic functions through unknown mechanisms. We hypothesize that activation of GPCRs, particularly orphan receptors due to their abundance in metabolically active tissues, contributes to the biological activity of sweeteners. We quantified the response of 64 orphans to the sweeteners saccharin and sucralose using a high-throughput β-arrestin-2 recruitment assay (PRESTO-Tango). GPR52 was the sole receptor that significantly responded to a mixture of sucralose and saccharin. Subsequent experiments revealed sucralose as the activating sweetener. Activation of GPR52 was concentration-dependent, with an EC 50 of 0.23 mmol/L and an Emax of 3.43 ± 0.24 fold change at 4 mmol/L. GPR52 constitutively activates CRE pathways; however, we show that sucralose-induced activation of GPR52 does not further activate this pathway. Identification of this novel sucralose-GPCR interaction supports the notion that sucralose elicits off-target signaling through the activation of GPR52, calling into question sucralose's assumed lack of bioactivity., Competing Interests: The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective cancer treatment modality, but standard RT often causes collateral damage to nearby healthy tissues. To increase therapeutic ratio, radiosensitization via gold nanoparticles (GNPs) has been shown to be effective. One challenge is that megavoltage beams generated by clinical linear accelerators are poor initiators of the photoelectric effect. Previous computer models predicted that a diamond target beam (DTB) will yield 400% more low-energy photons, increasing the probability of interacting with GNPs to enhance the radiation dose by 7.7-fold in the GNP vicinity. After testing DTB radiation coupled with GNPs in multiple cell types, we demonstrate decreased head-and-neck cancer (HNC) cell viability in vitro and enhanced cell-killing in zebrafish xenografts compared to standard RT. HNC cell lines also displayed increased double-stranded DNA breaks with DTB irradiation in the presence of GNPs. This study presents preclinical responses to GNP-enhanced radiotherapy with the novel DTB, providing the first functional data to support the theoretical evidence for radiosensitization via GNPs in this context, and highlighting the potential of this approach to optimize the efficacy of RT in anatomically difficult-to-treat tumors., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Phase I trials are a crucial step in the evaluation of new cancer therapies. Historically, low rates of response (5%) and comparably high rates of death from toxicities (0.5%) have contributed to debates on the ethics and orientation of these trials. With the introduction of novel targeted therapies, a contemporary estimate is needed., Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for reports of phase I oncology trials of single-agent targeted immunomodulators, molecularly targeted therapies, and antiangiogenic agents, published between January 2015 and July 2018. Adult and pediatric trials of solid and hematological malignancies were eligible. Treatment-related adverse events (grades 3, 4, and 5) and response rates (objective, complete, and partial) were extracted and analyzed., Results: One hundred and fifty-eight trial reports, covering 6,707 patients, were included. The rate of treatment-related deaths was 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0 to 0.1), while 13.2% of patients (9.5 to 17.3) experienced a grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicity. The combined objective response rate was 6.4% (4.6 to 8.5). Among trials using tumor biomarkers as eligibility criteria, the objective response rate was higher (12.0% [7.3 to 17.6] compared to 4.9% [2.5 to 5.7], P value < .01). The same was true of trials focusing on a single tumor type (13.4% [8.2 to 19.4]) compared to multiple tumor types (3.8% [2.5 to 5.3], P value < .01)., Conclusion: Reduced grade 5 risk and improved benefit appears to exist in modern phase I oncology trials, particularly in trials that target single tumor types and integrate biomarkers as eligibility criteria. These findings provide information to support informed consent discussions, highlight the need for improved reporting of phase I oncology trials, and provide direction for optimizing their design.