Search

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require periods of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation, leading to diaphragm dysfunction. Our study seeks to determine whether the combination of temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation (TTDN) and mechanical ventilation changes the degree of diaphragm injury and cytokines concentration in a preclinical ARDS model. Moderate ARDS was induced in pigs using oleic acid, followed by ventilation for 12 h post-injury with volume-control at 8 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2O, respiratory rate and F I O 2 set to achieve normal arterial blood gases. Two groups received TTDN: every second breath (MV + TTDN50%, n = 6) or every breath (MV + TTDN100%, n = 6). One group received ventilation only (MV, n = 6). Full-thickness diaphragm and quadricep muscle biopsies were taken at study end. Samples were fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and a point-counting technique was applied to calculate abnormal muscle area fraction. Cytokine concentrations were measured in homogenized tissue using porcine-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compared with serum samples. Percentage of abnormal diaphragm tissue was different between MV [8.1% (6.0–8.8)] versus MV + TTDN50% [3.4% (2.1–4.8)], P = 0.010 and MV versus MV + TTDN100% [3.1% (2.5–4.0)], P = 0.005. Percentage of abnormal quadriceps tissue was not different between groups. Cytokine concentration patterns in diaphragm samples were different between all groups (P < 0.001) and the interaction between TTDN application and resultant cytokine concentration pattern was significant (P = 0.025). TTDN, delivered in synchrony with mechanical ventilation, mitigated diaphragm injury, as evidenced by less abnormal tissue in the diaphragm samples, in pigs with oleic acid-induced ARDS and is an exciting tool for lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: This study adds to our understanding of applying transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation synchronously with mechanical ventilation by examining its effects on diaphragm muscle injury and cytokine concentration patterns in pigs with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We observed that using this therapy for 12 h post lung injury mitigated ventilator-induced diaphragm injury and changed the pattern of cytokine concentration measured in diaphragm tissue. These findings suggest that transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation is an exciting tool for lung and diaphragm protective ventilation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mechanical ventilation (MV)-induced diaphragmatic atrophy can contribute to weaning difficulties. A temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation (TTDN) device that elicits diaphragm contractions has previously been shown to mitigate atrophy during MV in a preclinical model; however, its effects on different myofiber types remain unknown. It is important to examine these effects, as each myofiber type plays a role in the range of diaphragmatic movements to ensure successful liberation from MV. Eighteen pigs were assigned to one of three ventilation conditions for 50 hours: MV-Only and TTDN contracting the diaphragm every other breath or every breath synchronously with MV (TTDN50% þ MV and TTDN100% þ MV, respectively). Six pigs were assigned to a never-ventilated, never-paced (NV-NP) group. Diaphragm biopsies were fiber-typed, and myofiber cross-sectional areas were measured and normalized to subject weight. There were effect differences based on TTDN exposure. The TTDN100% þ MV group showed less atrophy in Type 2A and 2X myofibers than the TTDN50% þ MV group, relative to the NV-NP group. The TTDN50% þ MV animals showed less MV-induced atrophy in type 1 myofibers than TTDN100% þ MV animals. Additionally, there were no significant differences in proportions of myofiber types between each condition. TTDN applied synchronously with MV for 50 hours mitigates MV-induced atrophy in all myofiber types, with no evidence of stimulation-induced myofiber-type shift. At this stimulation profile, enhanced protection for type 1 myofibers and type 2 myofibers was seen when diaphragm contractions occurred every other breath and every breath, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Mechanical ventilator breaths provided to deeply sedated patients have an abnormal volume distribution, encouraging alveolar collapse in dependent regions and promoting alveolar overdistention in non-dependent regions. Collapse and overdistention both start with the first breath and worsen over time, driving ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). This is exacerbated when the lung is already injured or has increased heterogeneity. Our study investigated the impact of a single episode of lung injury on lung mechanics and the risk factors for ventilator-induced injury, compared with non-injured lungs. Methods: Two groups of pigs were sedated and ventilated using lung-protective volume-controlled mode at 8 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2O, with respiratory rate and FiO2 set to maintain normal blood gas values. Animals in one group were ventilated for 50 h (50-Hour MV group, n=10). Animals in the second group had lung injury induced using oleic acid and were ventilated for 12 h post-injury (LI MV group, n=6). Both groups were compared with a never-ventilated control group (NV, n=6). Lung mechanics and injury were measured using electrical impedance tomography, esophageal pressure monitoring and tissue histology. Results: End-expiratory lung-volume loss was greater in the 50-Hour MV group (P<0.05). Plateau pressure, driving pressure and lung injury score were higher in the LI MV group, (P<0.05). Conclusion: Risk factors for VILI developed three- to five-times faster in the group with injured lungs, demonstrating that a single lung-injury episode substantially increased the risk of VILI, compared with normal lungs, despite using a lung-protective mechanical ventilation protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tidal volume delivered by mechanical ventilation to a sedated patient is distributed in a nonphysiological pattern, causing atelectasis (underinflation) and overdistension (overinflation). Activation of the diaphragm during controlled mechanical ventilation in these sedated patients may provide a method to reduce atelectasis and alveolar inhomogeneity, protecting the lungs from ventilator-induced lung injury while also protecting the diaphragm by preventing ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction. We studied the hypothesis that diaphragm contractions elicited by transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation, delivered in synchrony with volume-control ventilation, would reduce atelectasis and lung inhomogeneity in a healthy, normal lung pig model. Twenty-five large pigs were ventilated for 50 h with lung-protective volume-control ventilation combined with synchronous transvenous phrenic-nerve neurostimulation on every breath, or every second breath. This was compared to lung-protective ventilation alone. Lung mechanics and ventilation pressures were measured using esophageal pressure manometry and electrical impedance tomography. Alveolar homogeneity was measured using alveolar chord length of preserved lung tissue. Lung injury was measured using inflammatory cytokine concentration in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum. We found that diaphragm neurostimulation on every breath preserved PaO2/FIO2 and significantly reduced the loss of end-expiratory lung volume after 50 h of mechanical ventilation. Neurostimulation on every breath reduced plateau and driving pressures, improved both static and dynamic compliance and resulted in less alveolar inhomogeneity. These findings support that temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation during volume-controlled, lung-protective ventilation may offer a potential method to provide both lung- and diaphragmprotective ventilation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation has been shown to mitigate diaphragm atrophy in a preclinical model. This study contributes to this work by demonstrating that diaphragm neurostimulation can also offer lung protection from ventilator injury, providing a potential solution to the dilemma of lung- versus diaphragm-protective ventilation. Our findings show that neurostimulation on every breath preserved PaO2/FIO2, end-expiratory lung volume, alveolar homogeneity, and required lower pressures than lung-protective ventilation over 50 h in healthy pigs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the discussion on stimulation of neuropathways in conjunction with mechanical ventilation (MV) resulting in better cognitive function after MV playing an important role in ventilation-associated brain injury (VABI) .

Tidal volume delivered by mechanical ventilation to a sedated patient is distributed in a nonphysiological pattern, causing atelectasis (underinflation) and overdistension (overinflation). Activation of the diaphragm during controlled mechanical ventilation in these sedated patients may provide a method to reduce atelectasis and alveolar inhomogeneity, protecting the lungs from ventilator-induced lung injury while also protecting the diaphragm by preventing ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction. We studied the hypothesis that diaphragm contractions elicited by transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation, delivered in synchrony with volume-control ventilation, would reduce atelectasis and lung inhomogeneity in a healthy, normal lung pig model. Twenty-five large pigs were ventilated for 50 h with lung-protective volume-control ventilation combined with synchronous transvenous phrenic-nerve neurostimulation on every breath, or every second breath. This was compared to lung-protective ventilation alone. Lung mechanics and ventilation pressures were measured using esophageal pressure manometry and electrical impedance tomography. Alveolar homogeneity was measured using alveolar chord length of preserved lung tissue. Lung injury was measured using inflammatory cytokine concentration in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum. We found that diaphragm neurostimulation on every breath preserved [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text] and significantly reduced the loss of end-expiratory lung volume after 50 h of mechanical ventilation. Neurostimulation on every breath reduced plateau and driving pressures, improved both static and dynamic compliance and resulted in less alveolar inhomogeneity. These findings support that temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation during volume-controlled, lung-protective ventilation may offer a potential method to provide both lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation has been shown to mitigate diaphragm atrophy in a preclinical model. This study contributes to this work by demonstrating that diaphragm neurostimulation can also offer lung protection from ventilator injury, providing a potential solution to the dilemma of lung- versus diaphragm-protective ventilation. Our findings show that neurostimulation on every breath preserved [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text], end-expiratory lung volume, alveolar homogeneity, and required lower pressures than lung-protective ventilation over 50 h in healthy pigs.