Search

The seven-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) and the total score of the 14-item HADS (HADS-T) are both used for major depression screening. Compared to the HADS-D, the HADS-T includes anxiety items and requires more time to complete. We compared the screening accuracy of the HADS-D and HADS-T for major depression detection. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis and fit bivariate random effects models to assess diagnostic accuracy among participants with both HADS-D and HADS-T scores. We identified optimal cutoffs, estimated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, and compared screening accuracy across paired cutoffs via two-stage and individual-level models. We used a 0.05 equivalence margin to assess equivalency in sensitivity and specificity. 20,700 participants (2,285 major depression cases) from 98 studies were included. Cutoffs of ≥7 for the HADS-D (sensitivity 0.79 [0.75, 0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.75, 0.80]) and ≥15 for the HADS-T (sensitivity 0.79 [0.76, 0.82], specificity 0.81 [0.78, 0.83]) minimized the distance to the top-left corner of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Across all sets of paired cutoffs evaluated, differences of sensitivity between HADS-T and HADS-D ranged from -0.05 to 0.01 (0.00 at paired optimal cutoffs), and differences of specificity were within 0.03 for all cutoffs (0.02-0.03). The pattern was similar among outpatients, although the HADS-T was slightly (not nonequivalently) more specific among inpatients. The accuracy of HADS-T was equivalent to the HADS-D for detecting major depression. In most settings, the shorter HADS-D would be preferred. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Background: To what extent the COVID-19 pandemic and its containment measures influenced mental health in the general population is still unclear., Purpose: To assess the trajectory of mental health symptoms during the first year of the pandemic and examine dose-response relations with characteristics of the pandemic and its containment., Data Sources: Relevant articles were identified from the living evidence database of the COVID-19 Open Access Project, which indexes COVID-19-related publications from MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and PsycInfo. Preprint publications were not considered., Study Selection: Longitudinal studies that reported data on the general population's mental health using validated scales and that were published before 31 March 2021 were eligible., Data Extraction: An international crowd of 109 trained reviewers screened references and extracted study characteristics, participant characteristics, and symptom scores at each timepoint. Data were also included for the following country-specific variables: days since the first case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the stringency of governmental containment measures, and the cumulative numbers of cases and deaths., Data Synthesis: In a total of 43 studies (331 628 participants), changes in symptoms of psychological distress, sleep disturbances, and mental well-being varied substantially across studies. On average, depression and anxiety symptoms worsened in the first 2 months of the pandemic (standardized mean difference at 60 days, -0.39 [95% credible interval, -0.76 to -0.03]); thereafter, the trajectories were heterogeneous. There was a linear association of worsening depression and anxiety with increasing numbers of reported cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and increasing stringency in governmental measures. Gender, age, country, deprivation, inequalities, risk of bias, and study design did not modify these associations., Limitations: The certainty of the evidence was low because of the high risk of bias in included studies and the large amount of heterogeneity. Stringency measures and surges in cases were strongly correlated and changed over time. The observed associations should not be interpreted as causal relationships., Conclusion: Although an initial increase in average symptoms of depression and anxiety and an association between higher numbers of reported cases and more stringent measures were found, changes in mental health symptoms varied substantially across studies after the first 2 months of the pandemic. This suggests that different populations responded differently to the psychological stress generated by the pandemic and its containment measures., Primary Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation. (PROSPERO: CRD42020180049).

Objectives: Validated diagnostic interviews are required to classify depression status and estimate prevalence of disorder, but screening tools are often used instead. We used individual participant data meta-analysis to compare prevalence based on standard Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - depression subscale (HADS-D) cutoffs of ≥8 and ≥11 versus Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression and determined if an alternative HADS-D cutoff could more accurately estimate prevalence., Methods: We searched Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations via Ovid, PsycINFO, and Web of Science (inception-July 11, 2016) for studies comparing HADS-D scores to SCID major depression status. Pooled prevalence and pooled differences in prevalence for HADS-D cutoffs versus SCID major depression were estimated., Results: 6005 participants (689 SCID major depression cases) from 41 primary studies were included. Pooled prevalence was 24.5% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 20.5%, 29.0%) for HADS-D ≥8, 10.7% (95% CI: 8.3%, 13.8%) for HADS-D ≥11, and 11.6% (95% CI: 9.2%, 14.6%) for SCID major depression. HADS-D ≥11 was closest to SCID major depression prevalence, but the 95% prediction interval for the difference that could be expected for HADS-D ≥11 versus SCID in a new study was -21.1% to 19.5%., Conclusions: HADS-D ≥8 substantially overestimates depression prevalence. Of all possible cutoff thresholds, HADS-D ≥11 was closest to the SCID, but there was substantial heterogeneity in the difference between HADS-D ≥11 and SCID-based estimates. HADS-D should not be used as a substitute for a validated diagnostic interview., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Two previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) found that different diagnostic interviews classify different proportions of people as having major depression overall or by symptom levels. We compared the odds of major depression classification across diagnostic interviews among studies that administered the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D)., Methods: Data accrued for an IPDMA on HADS-D diagnostic accuracy were analysed. We fit binomial generalized linear mixed models to compare odds of major depression classification for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), controlling for HADS-D scores and participant characteristics with and without an interaction term between interview and HADS-D scores., Results: There were 15,856 participants (1942 [12%] with major depression) from 73 studies, including 15,335 (97%) non-psychiatric medical patients, 164 (1%) partners of medical patients, and 357 (2%) healthy adults. The MINI (27 studies, 7345 participants, 1066 major depression cases) classified participants as having major depression more often than the CIDI (10 studies, 3023 participants, 269 cases) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.70 (0.84, 3.43)) and the semi-structured SCID (36 studies, 5488 participants, 607 cases) (aOR = 1.52 (1.01, 2.30)). The odds ratio for major depression classification with the CIDI was less likely to increase as HADS-D scores increased than for the SCID (interaction aOR = 0.92 (0.88, 0.96))., Conclusion: Compared to the SCID, the MINI may diagnose more participants as having major depression, and the CIDI may be less responsive to symptom severity., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a systemic inflammatory disease with chronic back pain as the most common presenting symptom. We present a case of a male patient with AS reporting symptoms of severe low back pain, buttock pain, and limited spinal mobility. After chronic treatment with opioids, we administered pregabalin at a dose of 300 mg as an analgesic agent while opioids were discontinued. Findings. Pain symptoms improved progressively, and opioids were gradually discontinued without any withdrawal symptoms reported. Conclusions. Pregabalin is potentially useful in the management of pain in patients with AS while effectively managing the discontinuation of opioid treatment.

The objective this study aimed to investigate the independent contribution of somatic anxiety to the severity of depression-related fatigue. Seventy-six patients (85.5% female), aged 23-65 years (mean 48.7±10.6), diagnosed with major depressive disorder and currently in a major depressive episode (ΜΙΝΙ 5.0.0.) with a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score ≥17, were studied. Forty-nine patients (64.5%) were concurrently suf fering from anxiety disorder(s). Patients with physical diseases or other fatigue-related conditions were excluded. Reported fatigue was measured with the 14-item Fatigue Questionnaire (FQ). Based on HDRS item 11 (somatic anxiety) scores, patients were divided into those with somatic anxiety (HDRS-11≥2) and those without (HDRS-11≤1). Pearson's (r) and Spearman's (rho) correlations between FQ score, age, gender, inpatient status, HDRS score and somatic anxiety status were calculated. A multiple regression analysis was then performed, with FQ as the dependent variable. Fifty-seven patients (75%) were rated as suffering from somatic anxiety (HDRS-11≥2). Patients with somatic anxiety had significantly higher HDRS and FQ scores. The FQ score significantly correlated with the HDRS score (r=0.36, p=0.001) and somatic anxiety status (rho=0.35, p=0.002). The FQ score was independently predicted by HDRS score and somatic anxiety status, with standardised beta coefficients of 0.259 (p=0.028) and 0.255 (p=0.031), respectively. R2 was 0.185. Both the severity of depression and the presence of somatic anxiety independently correlate with the severity of reported fatigue in patients with major depression. This finding has potential implications for the management of depression-related fatigue.

We present a case of refractory psychosis with prominent cognitive deficits in a patient with 'mega-cisterna magna', a congenital defect within the 'Dandy-Walker Complex' continuum. The 21-year-old female had a 3-year history of refractory psychotic symptoms despite adequate antipsychotic treatment. CT and MRI scans disclosed 'mega-cisterna magna'. Thorough neuropsychological testing recorded extensive deficits. Treatment with amisulpride 1200 mg/day resulted in a 30% decrease in PANSS score within 2 months. Then galantamine 8 mg/day was added and PANSS score decreased further by 27% within 2 weeks. Cognitive and social functioning was overall much improved. The effect was sustained in a 24 months follow-up. It is postulated that even a less extended cerebellar lesion, such as mega-cisterna magna, can be associated with psychosis, and in some cases with treatment refractoriness or cognitive dysfunction. Adjuvant galantamine may improve cognitive and psychosocial functioning in these patients.

Objective: Atypical antipsychotics are frequently used as augmentation agents in clozapine-resistant schizophrenic patients. Risperidone (RIS) is the one most studied as a clozapine (CLZ) adjunct. The aim of this study is to critically review all published studies regarding the efficacy and safety of RIS as an adjunctive agent in CLZ-resistant schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients., Methods: A MEDLINE search from January 1988 to June 2005 was conducted. Identified papers were examined against several clinical, pharmacological and methodological parameters., Results: A total of 15 studies were found (2 randomized controlled trials, 3 open-label trials (OTs) and 8 case-studies (CSs)) comprising 86 schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients (mean age 38.4 years). Mean CLZ dosage during the combined treatment was 474.2 mg/day. Plasma CLZ levels were assessed in 62 patients (72.1%). RIS was added at a mean dosage of 4.6 mg/day for a mean of 7.9 weeks. Significant improvement in psychopathology was reported for 37 patients (43%). A lower RIS dosage and a longer duration of the trial seemed to be associated with a better outcome. Main side effects reported were: extrapyramidal symptoms or akathisia (9.3%), sedation (7%) and hypersalivation (5.8%)., Conclusions: Existing evidence encourages the use of RIS as an adjunctive agent in CLZ-resistant schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients.

The objective of this study was to assess switching to amisulpride (AMS) in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Seven male subjects were switched to AMS and followed for 8 weeks. PANSS scores improved from 123 to 66 over this period. We conclude that AMS is of interest in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia.

Objective: The aim of this article is to critically review all published studies regarding the efficacy and safety of the concurrent administration of clozapine (CLZ) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in CLZ-resistant schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients., Method: A MEDLINE search from January 1980 to July 2005 was conducted., Results: One open-label trial and 6 case studies were located, comprising 21 schizophrenic and 1 schizo affective patients (12 men and 10 women) with a mean age of 41.9 years. The duration and dosage of CLZ monotherapy before ECT were reported at least 12 weeks and 300 mg/d, respectively, in 10 patients (45.4%). Plasma CLZ levels before ECT were assessed in 12 patients (54.5%), in which only 7 (31.8%) were reported to be higher than 350 ng/mL. The CLZ dosage during ECT ranged from 200 to 900 mg/d (mean, 518.2 +/- 203.3 mg/d). The number of ECT sessions ranged from 2 to 20 (mean, 11.5 +/- 5.4). Application of electrodes was unilateral in 7 patients, bilateral in 10 patients, and mixed in 2 patients. Sixteen patients (72.7%) showed marked improvement whereas 6 patients (27.3%) had moderate, minimal, or no improvement. No predictors of outcome could be isolated. Side effects reported by 5 patients (22.7%) were nausea, tachycardia, hypertension, memory problems, and confusion. Ten patients (45.4%) relapsed during follow-up. Substantial improvement persisted beyond 4 months in only 5 patients (22.7%)., Conclusion: Preliminary evidence exists for the safety and short-term efficacy of the concurrent administration of CLZ and ECT in CLZ-resistant schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients.

Approximately 40-70% of treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients fail to benefit from clozapine monotherapy or are partial responders. During the last years several clozapine adjunctive agents have come into clinical practice. This study aims to critically review all published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) regarding the efficacy and safety of adjunctive agents in clozapine-resistant schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients. A MEDLINE search for RCTs on clozapine adjunctive agents published from January 1980 to February 2004 was conducted. All identified papers were critically reviewed and examined against several methodological features as well as clinical and pharmacological parameters. Eleven trials including 270 patients, partial or non-responders to clozapine, assessed the efficacy of sulpiride, lithium, lamotrigine, fluoxetine, glycine, d-serine, d-cycloserine and ethyl-eicosapentanoate (E-EPA) as clozapine adjuncts. There were eight parallel-group and three crossover trials. The inclusion criteria varied widely. The duration as well as the dosage of clozapine monotherapy were reported adequate in only one trial. Plasma clozapine levels were assessed in only three trials. Main side-effects reported were hypersalivation, sedation, diarrhea, nausea, hyperprolactinaemia. The outcome favored clozapine augmentation with sulpiride, lamotrigine and E-EPA. Lithium was shown to benefit only schizoaffective patients. However, the methodological shortcomings of trials analyzed limit the impact of evidence provided.

Approximately 40%-70% of neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenic patients are nonresponders even to clozapine. Several clozapine augmentation strategies have come into clinical practice, although often without evidence-based support. This study aims to critically review all the reported case studies regarding the efficacy and safety of adjunctive agents in clozapine-resistant schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients. All published case studies examining the efficacy and safety of adjunctive agents in clozapine-resistant schizophrenic patients were searched for in the MEDLINE database from January 1980 to February 2004. Case studies regarding ECT as a clozapine augmentation strategy were not included in our study. All the included papers were critically reviewed and examined against a set of clinical and pharmacological parameters, outcome measures, and reported side effects. Fifteen case studies regarding the efficacy and safety of sulpiride, risperidone, olanzapine, lithium, lamotrigine, fluvoxamine, and bromocriptine as clozapine adjuncts were found. A total of 33 schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients were included. Of the 15 studies, 8 were associated with risperidone. The duration and dosage of previous clozapine monotherapy was adequate for 16 patients. Plasma clozapine level was assessed for only 7 patients. Outcome measures were used for only 11 patients. The outcome was positive in 13 studies. Combined treatments were generally well tolerated, and side effects never resulted in discontinuation of treatment. Most case studies favor the use of risperidone as an adjunctive agent in clozapine-resistant schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients. However, small numbers of patients and other methodological shortcomings limit the impact of evidence provided.