Search

Given the increasing complexity of cancer care, multidisciplinary tumor boards have become essential in daily clinical oncology practice. The Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) initiative developed an innovative telementoring model using a "hub and spoke" design consisting of a team of experts (hub) that offers a full service to multiple participants (the spokes) during regularly scheduled sessions discussing patients' clinical cases. The Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute in Buenos Aires was the first hub in Latin America to implement Project ECHO for gastrointestinal tumors. In our 3-year experience, 80 patients from 37 centers were evaluated within Project ECHO and a range of three to five cases were discussed in each meeting. From our perspective, the impact of this novel approach was a remarkable strategy to reduce care disparities by equalizing access to high-quality medical knowledge in a multidisciplinary environment for medical discussions. Additionally, it was shown to have a cost-effective impact directly on the patients and the local health system, since relevant costs were saved after unnecessary treatments, studies and travel expenses were avoided.

PURPOSE In recent years, unprecedented benefits have been observed with the development of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors for the treatment of hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer. However, there is scarce evidence of their value in specific populations, such as patients carrying germline pathogenic variants in DNA repair–related genes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively studied the efficacy of CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer. Three cohorts were compared, including patients harboring germline pathogenic variants in DNA repair–related genes (g BRCA1/2- ATM- CHEK2 mutated), those tested without these mutations (wild type [WT]), and the nontested subgroup. Relevant prognostic factors including age, metastatic site (visceral v nonvisceral), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and prior treatment with CDK 4/6 inhibitors were stratified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS Among the total population (n = 217), 15 (6.9%) patients carried g BRCA1/2 (n = 10)- ATM (n = 4)- CHEK2 (n = 1) pathogenic variants, 45 (20.7%) were WT, and 157 (72.4%) were nontested. Gene pathogenic variant carriers were younger ( P < .001). Most patients (164, 75.6%) had not received prior endocrine therapy in the advanced setting. Median progression-free survival was shorter in patients with evaluated germline pathogenic variants (10.2 months [95% CI, 5.7 to 14.7]), compared with WT and nontested patients (15.6 months [95% CI, 7.8 to 23.4], and (17.6 months [95% CI, 12.9 to 22.2]; P = .002). Consistently, a worse median overall survival was observed in the subgroup with germline pathogenic variants than in the WT group ( P = .006). Multivariable analysis showed that mutation status was an independent prognostic factor of progression-free survival ( P = .020) and overall survival ( P = .012). CONCLUSION In this retrospective real-world study, g BRCA1/ 2- ATM-CHEK2 pathogenic variants were independently associated with poor outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

146 Background: Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) is an option in the neoadjuvant setting of resectable stage II-III rectal cancer, as well as in stage IV disease for local control without delay to initiate systemic treatment. Short-course radiotherapy is reported to be a comparable strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Limited data exist regarding the use of short-course radiation therapy when used as part of a non-surgical watch and wait approach. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients that underwent SCRT for rectal cancer at the Alexander Fleming Institute from 3/2014 to 6/2022. Results: 44 patients were treated with SCRT, 29 (66%) were male, with a median age of 59 years (46-73). Most of the patients had stage IV disease (26, 59,1%) followed by clinical stage II-III (18, 40,9%). 30 (68%) were localized in the middle with 14 (32%) in the lower rectum, by MRI imaging. In locally advanced disease 5/18 had T4 disease and 7/18 had N≥2. 14/18 patients (89%) underwent SCRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy (ChT) and 4 (11%) had induction ChT followed by SCRT. In metastatic disease 14/26 patients (53.84%) underwent SCRT followed by consolidation ChT, 10 (38.46%) had induction ChT followed by SCRT, and 2 (7.7%) received only SCRT. 29 (65.9%) of patients underwent surgery. 17/29(58.6%) had metastatic disease and 12/29 (41.4%) had locally advanced disease. Pathological response rates in operated patients were 2 (6.9%). 8 (18.2%) cases had a clinical complete response (cCR) (n=6 stage II-III and n=2 stage IV). Five (27.7% of the locally advanced group) patients with cCR underwent watch and wait with 1 local recurrence after 14 months. The remainder is disease free with a median follow-up time of 20 months (IC 95%: 15.14-24.85). Those that underwent SCRT following chemotherapy were more likely to have AEs compared to those that had chemotherapy following SCRT (11/30, 36.7% vs 25%, p=0.02). Conclusions: Our work shows that in a subgroup of patients diagnosed with LARC treated with SCRT followed by Chemotherapy, surgical treatment could be deferred after achieving a complete clinical response. The shorter time involved by SCRT allowed for less treatments with similar toxicity to long-course treatment regimens. SCRT is a reasonable option for local disease control in stage IV disease.

The targeted therapy cetuximab [directed at the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)] in combination with 5-fluorouracil and platinum-based chemotherapy (the EXTREME regimen) has shown substantial efficacy for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). Thus, this scheme has been established as the preferred first-line option for these patients. However, more recently, a new strategy combining platinum, taxanes, and cetuximab (the TPEx regimen) has demonstrated similar efficacy with a more favorable toxicity profile in clinical trials.To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TPEx scheme as first-line therapy in advanced SCCHN in a multicenter cohort study.This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic SCCHN treated with first-line TPEx at five medical centers in Argentina between January 1, 2017 and April 31, 2020. Chemotherapy consisted of four cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin, and cetuximab followed by cetuximab maintenance therapy. Clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles were collected from medical charts. Treatment response was assessed by the investigator in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0).Twenty-four patients were included. The median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range: 36-77 years). The majority of patients (83.3%) received at least four chemotherapy cycles in the initial phase. In the included group, the overall response rate was 62.5%, and 3 patients achieved a complete response (12.5%). The median time to response was 2.4 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-3.5]. With a median follow-up of 12.7 mo (95%CI: 8.8-16.6), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 mo (95%CI: 6.5-7.3), and the overall survival rate at 12 mo was 82.4%. Patients with documented tumor response showed a better PFS than those with disease stabilization or progression [8.5 mo (95%CI: 5.5-11.5) and 4.5 mo (95%CI: 2.5-6.6), respectively;TPEx was an adequately tolerated regimen in our population, with low incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events. The median PFS were consistent with those in recent reports of clinical trials evaluating this treatment combination. This regimen may be considered an attractive therapeutic strategy due to its simplified administration, decreased total number of chemotherapy cycles, and treatment tolerability.

Burnout (BO) syndrome is a condition that results in physical and mental distress The current COVID-19 pandemic is strongly affecting the mental health of the general population We aimed to assess the incidence of BO among medical oncologists and determine factors associated with burnout levels during the current pandemic Methods: A digital survey was created for this study The Spanish-validated version of Maslach BO Inventory was incorporated to define BO Social and demographic information was analysed to remove duplicated answers Results: A total of 188 Argentinian medical oncologists from 16 cities participated in the survey The median age of the participants was 43 years (IQR 38-50) and a similar distribution between male and female was observed At the time of the survey, Argentina was in the third month of strict lockdown Most of the participants practiced in both public and private practice facilities (55 3%) and the majority reported more than 10 years of experience (53 2%) Twenty-five percent (43) of subjects reported high levels of DP, 39 9% (75) reported high levels of EE and 53 7% (101) reported low levels of PA BO Maslach criteria were fulfilled by 14 9% (28) We compared this result with other burnout assessment tools Using the Gil-Monte and Neira tool, BO-associated domains were altered in 77 1%, 42% and 42% for EE, DP, and PA domains, respectively Concomitantly, under Neira assessment a domain impairment was appreciated in 77 1%, 76% and 54% respectively BO criteria were met by 30 3% (57) according to Gil-Monte and 47 9% (90) to Neira Conclusion: BO is a multifaceted issue with a negative impact on physicians, patients, and institutions During the COVID-19 pandemic, BO criteria was met in a considerable proportion of survey respondents using MBI, and Peiro and Neiro tools and younger age, use of antidepressants and psychological medications and income reduction arose as statistically significant factors after multivariate analysis Copyright: © the authors;licensee ecancermedicalscience This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

Non-cytotoxic therapy has changed the treatment paradigm for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. With unique mechanisms of action, these agents have decidedly improved survival and have demonstrated an improved toxicity profile. However, the real-life experience of the patient, which is commonly assessed by health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurement, is not clearly established with this new generation of lung cancer treatments. The heterogeneity created by specific patient subgroups and different therapeutics calls for a tailored-approach to analyzing patient-reported outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the methodological quality of HRQoL analysis in Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) involving biologic agents to treat NSCLC.A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify NSCLC RCTs published between January 1st, 2000 and January 1st, 2020 reporting HRQoL measures. Only RCTs that both enrolled previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC and had HRQoL analysis were included.4203 abstracts were screened, of which only 85 RCTs met inclusion and exclusion criteria for analysis. The most applied HRQoL assessment tools were the EORTC-QLQ-C30 (47, 55.3 %), and EORTC-QLQ-LC13 (35, 41.2 %). The median number of verified CONSORT-PRO Extension criteria in the included trials was 3, and only in 10 (11.8 %) trials were all criteria well-documented. Notably, only 21 (24.7 %) RCTs performed subgroup analyses to specifically evaluate HRQoL in different patient populations.QoL reporting in clinical trials is inconsistent and the quality of QoL measures adopted in a majority of trials is suboptimal. Considering the fact that NSCLC is a biologically diverse disease and that the treatments differ based on patient and tumor-specifics, efforts should be pursued to tailor QoL measures for different subsets of this patient population in addition to mandating QoL reporting in clinical trials. We believe that this is necessary to understand the real-life experience of lung cancer patients in the era of personalized medicine.

1056 Background: HER2-low expression, defined as HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization assay (FISH), accounts for 50% of breast cancers. There is limited and conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors in patients with ER+ and HER2-low tumors. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of HER2-low expression in patients with ER+/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Methods: We retrospectively selected consecutive patients with ER+/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in our institution from May 2015 to Feb 2020. Two cohorts were compared, including HER2-0 (IHC score) and HER2-low (HER2 IHC score 1+ and 2+ [negative FISH]) tumors. Comparisons in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed using a log-rank test. The prognostic value of HER2-low was investigated by the Cox regression model. Results: Among the 186 patients included, median age at treatment was 55 (r 27-84), and majority had ECOG 0 (126, 67.8%). Progesterone receptor was positive in 155 (83.3%) tumors. Of note, most patients received CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy as first-line setting (131, 70.4%). Mostly received palbociclib (161, 86.6%), while ribociclib and abemaciclib were used in 23 (12.4%) and 2 (1.08%) patients, respectively. Overall, 27 patients (14.5%) had de novo metastatic disease, 68 (36.6%) had only bone metastases, and 69 (37.1%) had visceral disease. Of the total population, 64 (34.4%) tumors were HER2-low (43 [23.1%] HER2-1+, and 21 [11.3%] HER2-2+), and 122 (65.6%) were HER2-0. Median PFS among patients with HER2-0 and HER-low were 19 mo. (95% CI, 13.9-24.1), and 15.6 mo. (95% CI, 11.1-20.0), p = 0.074, respectively. In patients treated with CDK 4/6 in the first-line setting, no statistically significant differences were observed in terms of PFS and OS between HER2-0 and HER2-low (PFS HR 0.73 [95% CI, 0.47-1.13; p = 0.160], and OS HR 1.04 [95% CI, 0.51-2.14; p = 0.909]). Conclusions: In our study, HER2-low expression did not show a statistically significant impact on patients with ER+/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Our study supports the necessity of real-world evidence and the design of pooled analysis to understand the real implication of this biomarker in patients with ER+/HER2-negative tumors.

Introduction Breast cancer is the tumor with highest incidence in women worldwide and adjuvant treatment is extremely important to achieve disease control. Given the relevance of systematic reviews, their rigor should be warranted to avoid biased conclusions. Our objective was to investigate the methodological quality of meta-analysis of early breast cancer adjuvant treatment. Material and Methods Comprehensive searches were performed using electronic databases from 1/1/2007 to 11/12/2018. All studies identified as a systematic review with meta-analysis investigating the efficacy of breast cancer adjuvant treatments were included. Two reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts, then full-texts for eligibility. Quality was assessed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) version 2 tool. Results Of 950 citations retrieved, 66 studies (7.0%) were deemed eligible. Methodological quality was highly variable, median AMSTAR score 8.5 (IQR 7–9.5) and range 0–16. There was a weak positive correlation between journal impact factor and AMSTAR score (r = 0.17) and citation rate and AMSTAR score (r = 0.16). Cochrane Systematic Reviews were of higher quality than reviews from other journals. Overall confidence was critically low for 61 (92.4%) studies, and the least well-reported domains were the statement of conflict of interest and funding source for the included studies (4.6%), the report of a pre-defined study protocol (15.2%), and the description of details of excluded studies (6.1%). Conclusions Our findings reinforce concerns about the design, conduction and interpretation of meta-analysis in current literature. Methodological quality should be carefully considered and journal editors, decision makers and readers in general, must follow a critical approach to this studies.

Effective networking and mentoring are critical determinants of professional satisfaction and success in oncology. There are multiple benefits associated with established mentoring programs. However, these are scarce in Latin America (LATAM). The AAZPIRE project meeting was held to encourage the discussion of mentorship strategies in our region, to create new learning frameworks, and improve cancer care. A group of 30 young oncologists and investigators, together with seven members of LACOG and CLICaP experts of 8 LATAM countries, were reunited to share views and define opportunities, barriers, and possible solutions to implement mentorship programs in LATAM. For each of the mentioned topics, key points were obtained by consensus, and a literature review was conducted to support group conclusions. This article analyses mentoring in LATAM countries and its role on promoting leadership. It will address conceptual frameworks, limitations, and opportunities from the perspectives of both mentor and mentee. The creation of regional and international group stimulation programs and joint projects that impact health policies are attractive, starting points to implement mentorship scenarios.

BACKGROUNDThe association of platinum, taxanes, and cetuximab has proven to be an effective and safe strategy for head and neck cancer treatment. Here we present a multi-institutional real-world experience of the TPEx schema as first-line therapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).METHODS This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic SCCHN treated with first-line TPEx regimen at five medical centers in Argentina between January 1, 2017, and April 31, 2020. Chemotherapy consisted of four cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin, and cetuximab, followed by cetuximab maintenance. Clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles were evaluated. RESULTSTwenty-four patients were included. Median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range 36-77). The majority of patients (83.3%) received at least four chemotherapy cycles in the initial part. In the included group, overall response rate was 62.5%, and three patients achieved a complete response (12.5%). The median time to response was 2.4 months (95% CI 1.3-3.5). With a median follow-up of 12.7 months (95% CI 8.8-16.6), the median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI: 6.5-7.3), and the overall survival rate at 12 months was 82.4%. Two-thirds of patients reported at least one treatment-related adverse event, and 25% presented grade 3-4 toxicities.CONCLUSIONSTPEx was an adequately tolerated regimen in our population. Median progression-free survival and overall response rates were consistent with recent reports in clinical trials evaluating this treatment combination.

Malignant melanoma represents the most aggressive type of skin cancer. Modern therapies, including targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have changed the dismal prognosis that characterized this disease. However, most evidence was obtained by studying patients with frequent subtypes of cutaneous melanoma (CM). Consequently, there is an emerging need to understand the molecular basis and treatment approaches for unusual melanoma subtypes. Even a standardized definition of infrequent or rare melanoma is not clearly established. For that reason, we reviewed this challenging topic considering clinical and molecular perspectives, including uncommon CMs—not associated with classical V600E/K BRAF mutations—malignant mucosal and uveal melanomas, and some unusual independent entities, such as amelanotic, desmoplastic, or spitzoid melanomas. Finally, we collected information regarding melanomas from non-traditional primary sites, which emerge from locations as unique as meninges, dermis, lymph nodes, the esophagus, and breasts. The aim of this review is to summarize and highlight the main scientific evidence regarding rare melanomas, with a particular focus on treatment perspectives.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examines randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of modern cancer drugs in the adjuvant setting to determine the incidence of severe adverse events reported in placebo groups., Key Points Question What is the incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events in the placebo groups of modern cancer drug trials in the adjuvant setting? Findings In this systematic review and meta-analysis including 11 143 patients and 10 adjuvant, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials, the incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events in the placebo groups was 18%. Meaning This finding suggests that placebo administration may be associated with a substantial incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events in modern cancer adjuvant trials and should be considered by investigators and patients., Importance Several reports have associated the placebo effect with objective response and improvement of a clinical condition in oncology, but only a few studies have analyzed the adverse events (AEs) in the placebo groups of the clinical trials. Objective To determine the incidence of placebo AEs reported in randomized clinical trials of modern cancer drugs in the adjuvant setting. Data Sources Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline, a systematic literature search of English-language publications from January 1, 2000, through April 15, 2018, was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed). The following search terms were used to retrieve all trials from the PubMed library: adjuvant, maintenance, consolidation, and placebo, in addition to specific cancer type–related keywords. Study Selection A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 design was mandatory for study inclusion. Only studies enrolling patients who had undergone macroscopically complete resections were included. No other anticancer treatments in addition to placebo were allowed in the control group. Only trials involving a targeted therapy (tyrosine kinase, BRAF, or MEK inhibitors) or immunotherapy-related drugs were included. Trials using chemotherapy, interferon, and endocrine therapy were excluded. Two authors (D.H.E. and F.D.W.) independently reviewed the studies for inclusion. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were extracted by investigators, and random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the proportion of grade 3 to 4 placebo AEs in the included studies. Main Outcomes and Measures Incidence of grade 3 to 4 placebo AEs in the placebo groups. Results Of 731 studies screened, 10 eligible trials were found including 4 tumor types (melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and renal cell carcinoma). Overall, 11 143 patients (6270 [56.3%] in the treatment group with mean [SD] age of 55.6 [4.2] years and 4873 patients [43.7%] in the placebo group with mean [SD] age of 55.9 [4.3] years) were included. The mean incidence of any-grade placebo AEs was 85.1% (95% CI, 79.2%-91.0%). The most frequent (mean [SD]) grade 3 to 4 placebo AEs in patients were hypertension (2.8% [2.2%]), fatigue (1.0% [0.9%]), and diarrhea (0.8% [0.6%]). The overall, random-effects pooled incidence of grade 3 to 4 placebo AEs was 18% (95% CI, 15%-21%), with a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 86%). Frequency of grade 3 to 4 placebo AEs was found to be correlated in the treatment and placebo groups (ρ = 0.7; P = .03). Mean study drug discontinuation owing to placebo AEs was 3.9% (95% CI, 2.7%-5.2%). Conclusions and Relevance Placebo administration was associated with a substantial incidence of grade 3 to 4 placebo AEs in modern cancer adjuvant trials. This finding should be considered by investigators, sponsors, regulatory authorities, and patient support groups.