1. A phase 1 and randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of bevacizumab plus dasatinib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: Alliance/North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0872
- Author
-
Caterina Giannini, Xiomara W. Carrero, Jesse G. Dixon, Erin Twohy, S. Keith Anderson, Daniel M. Anderson, Evanthia Galanis, David Schiff, Ryan W. Feathers, Timothy J. Kaufmann, David Tran, Panos Z. Anastasiadis, Jan C. Buckner, Suriya A. Jeyapalan, Galanis E., Anderson S.K., Twohy E.L., Carrero X.W., Dixon J.G., Tran D.D., Jeyapalan S.A., Anderson D.M., Kaufmann T.J., Feathers R.W., Giannini C., Buckner J.C., Anastasiadis P.Z., and Schiff D.
- Subjects
Oncology ,Adult ,Male ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Bevacizumab ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,bevacizumab ,Placebo ,Drug Administration Schedule ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Glioma ,Internal medicine ,Lymphopenia ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Outcome Assessment, Health Care ,Clinical endpoint ,Medicine ,Humans ,dasatinib ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Adverse effect ,Fatigue ,Aged ,business.industry ,Brain Neoplasms ,Cancer ,phase 2 trial ,Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Dasatinib ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Src family kinase inhibitors ,Female ,Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ,business ,Glioblastoma ,medicine.drug ,recurrent glioblastoma - Abstract
Background: Src signaling is markedly upregulated in patients with invasive glioblastoma (GBM) after the administration of bevacizumab. The Src family kinase inhibitor dasatinib has been found to effectively block bevacizumab-induced glioma invasion in preclinical models, which led to the hypothesis that combining bevacizumab with dasatinib could increase bevacizumab efficacy in patients with recurrent GBM. Methods: After the completion of the phase 1 component, the phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00892177) randomized patients with recurrent GBM 2:1 to receive 100mg of oral dasatinib twice daily (arm A) or placebo (arm B) on days 1 to 14 of each 14-day cycle combined with 10mg/kg of intravenous bevacizumab on day 1 of each 14-day cycle. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6). Results: In the 121 evaluable patients, the PFS6 rate was numerically, but not statistically, higher in arm A versus arm B (28.9% [95% CI, 19.5%-40.0%] vs 18.4% [95% CI, 7.7%-34.4%]; P=.22). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the median overall survival noted between the treatment arms (7.3months and 7.7months, respectively; P=.93). The objective response rate was 15.7% in arm A and 26.3% in arm B (P=.52), but with a significantly longer duration in patients treated on arm A (16.3months vs 2months). The incidence of grade ≥3 toxicity was comparable between treatment arms, with hematologic toxicities occurring more frequently in arm A versus arm B (15.7% vs 7.9%) (adverse events were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Correlative tissue analysis demonstrated an association between pSRC/LYN signaling in patient tumors and outcome. Conclusions: Despite upregulation of Src signaling in patients with GBM, the combination of bevacizumab with dasatinib did not appear to significantly improve the outcomes of patients with recurrent GBM compared with bevacizumab alone.
- Published
- 2019