Search

Information on the characteristics or long-term outcomes of people with communication support needs post-stroke is limited. We investigated associations between communication gains in rehabilitation and long-term outcomes (quality-of-life [EuroQOL-ED-3 L], mortality) by post-stroke communication support need status. Retrospective cohort study using person-level linked data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry and the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre (2014–2017). Communication support needs were assessed using the Functional Independence Measure™ comprehension and expression items recorded on admission indicated by scores one (total assistance) to five (standby prompting). Multivariable multilevel and Cox regression models were used to determine associations with long-term outcomes. Of 8,394 patients who received in-patient rehabilitation after stroke (42% female, median age 75.6 years), two-thirds had post-stroke communication support needs. Having aphasia (odds ratio [OR] 4.34, 95% CI 3.67–5.14), being aged ≥65 years (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08–1.36), greater stroke severity (unable to walk on admission; OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.32–1.68) and previous stroke (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11–1.41) were associated with increased likelihoods of having communication support needs. One-point improvement in FIM™ expression was associated with reduced likelihood of self-reporting problems related to mobility (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80–0.90), self-care (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74–0.86) or usual activities (OR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75–0.94) at 90–180 days. Patients with communication support needs had greater mortality rates within one-year post-stroke (adjusted hazard ratio 1.99, 95% CI: 1.65–2.39). Two-thirds of patients with stroke require communication support to participate in healthcare activities. Establishing communication-accessible stroke care environments is a priority. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Survivors of stroke are at risk of experiencing subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We aimed to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, MACE after first-ever ischemic stroke, by age group (18–64 years vs. ≥65 years). Methods: Observational cohort study using patient-level data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (2009–2013), linked with hospital administrative data. We included adults with first-ever ischemic stroke who had no previous acute cardiovascular admissions and followed these patients for 2 years post-discharge, or until the first post-stroke MACE event. A Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model, accounting for the competing risk of non-cardiovascular death, was used to determine factors for incident post-stroke MACE. Results: Among 5,994 patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke (median age 73 years, 45% female), 17% were admitted for MACE within 2 years (129 events per 1,000 person-years). The median time to first post-stroke MACE was 117 days (89 days if aged <65 years vs. 126 days if aged ≥65 years; p = 0.025). Among patients aged 18–64 years, receiving intravenous thrombolysis (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28–0.92]) or being discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (SHR 0.65 [95% CI, 0.46–0.92]) were associated with a reduced incidence of post-stroke MACE. In those aged ≥65 years, being unable to walk on admission (SHR 1.33 [95% CI 1.15–1.54]), and history of smoking (SHR 1.40 [95% CI 1.14–1.71]) or atrial fibrillation (SHR 1.31 [95% CI 1.14–1.51]) were associated with an increased incidence of post-stroke MACE. Acute management in a large hospital (>300 beds) for the initial stroke event was associated with reduced incidence of post-stroke MACE, irrespective of age group. Conclusions: MACE is common within 2 years of stroke, with most events occurring within the first year. We have identified important factors to consider when designing interventions to prevent MACE after stroke, particularly among those aged <65 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Deconditioning describes functional decline, progressive weakness and physiological changes that result from prolonged bed rest and inactivity. Frailty is a syndrome in which age-related physiological changes are accelerated or exacerbated in multiple systems. Deconditioning is more likely in patients who experience frailty. Due to the complexities of these conditions, optimal management involves a multidisciplinary team comprised of GPs, specialists and allied health professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. This study describes how a model of early rehabilitation ('in-reach rehabilitation') can be integrated into acute care provision for hospitalised patients with high rehabilitation needs. This pragmatic evaluation aimed to assess service impact on home discharge rates from acute care. Methods. An integrated early rehabilitation service was implemented at a tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Eligible patients were screened, placed on a waitlist, and treated in order of debility (six to eight patients concurrently). Routine data were collected and compared between those who received an in-reach rehabilitation program, and controls who remained on waitlist. Results. From December 2021 to September 2022, 229 patients were identified as suitable for in-reach rehabilitation; of whom 100 received an in-reach program and the remaining 129 were waitlist controls. Patients who received in-reach rehabilitation achieved a significantly higher rate of discharge home from acute care compared to waitlist controls (46.0% vs 24.0%, P = 0.002) and lower rates of transfer to subacute inpatient rehabilitation (43.0% vs 62.0%). This was despite in-reach patients having high functional care needs (60% needed assistance from ≥two people to mobilise) and complex medical needs (median hospital length of stay 44.5 days, IQR 27.8-66.0). Conclusions. It is feasible to deliver in-reach rehabilitation to hospitalised patients with heterogeneous diagnoses who have high rehabilitation needs. The rate of discharge home directly from acute wards is higher among those patients who received early in-reach rehabilitation compared to those on a waitlist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Professional interpreters can improve healthcare quality and outcomes when there is language discordance between patients and health care providers. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation relies on nuanced communication; however, the use of interpreters in rehabilitation is underexplored. This study aimed to examine patterns of health care interpreter use in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients admitted for subacute rehabilitation during 2019–2020 identified as having limited English proficiency. Patterns of interpreter use (professional and "ad hoc") and rehabilitation outcomes were evaluated via medical record review. Eighty-five participants were included. During inpatient rehabilitation (median 17 [12–28] days), most clinical interactions (95%) occurred without an interpreter present. Patterns of interpreter use were variable; with greater use of ad hoc versus professional interpreters (received by 60% versus 49% of the cohort, respectively). Those who interacted with a professional interpreter had a longer length-of-stay, larger Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gain, and lower rate of hospital readmission six months post-discharge. The number of professional interpreter sessions correlated positively with FIM gain. Access to professional interpreters in inpatient rehabilitation was variable, with some patients having no or minimal access. These findings provide preliminary evidence that professional interpreter use may be associated with clinical rehabilitation outcomes. Professional health care interpreters can be used to overcome language barriers in rehabilitation. In an inpatient rehabilitation setting, professional interpreters appeared to be underutilized, with many patients having no or minimal access to interpreters. Use of ad hoc, untrained interpreters and informal communication strategies was common during rehabilitation. Use of professional interpreters appeared to be associated with favorable rehabilitation outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Older people subject to homelessness face many challenges including poor health status, geriatric syndromes, and depression, coupled with barriers in accessing health and aged care services. Many are in need of formal aged care at a younger age than the general population, yet, in Australia, specialised aged-care services to support this vulnerable cohort are limited. Methods: This study was an evaluation of a new purpose-built aged care home for people with high care needs and who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. Over the first 12 months post-admission, the study examined: (1) changes in residents' physical, mental, psychological and social health, and (2) the costs incurred by the study cohort, including any cost benefit derived. Results: Thirty-five residents enrolled in the study between March 2020 – April 2021. At admission, almost half of residents were within the range for dementia, the majority were frail, at high risk for falls, and had scores indicative of depression. Over time, linear mixed-effect models showed significant improvement in personal wellbeing scores, with clinically significant improvements in overall health related quality of life. Levels of physical functional independence, frailty, and global cognition were stable, but cognitive functional ability declined over time. Comparison of 12 month pre- and post- admission cost utility data for a smaller cohort (n = 13) for whom complete data were available, suggested an average per resident saving of approximately AU$32,000, while the QALY indicators remained stable post-admission. Conclusion: While this was a small study with no control group, these preliminary positive outcomes add to the growing body of evidence that supports the need for dedicated services to support older people subject to homelessness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in improving the health outcomes, quality of life, and independence of individuals with disabilities. The choice of rehabilitation setting and model depends on various factors, such as the patient's condition, psychosocial and environmental factors, personal goals, and access to funding. Primary care physicians can utilize several rehabilitation services to support their adult patients with disabilities.

Objectives Societal and health system pressures associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic exacerbated the burden of chronic pain and limited access to pain management services for many. Online multidisciplinary pain programs offer an effective and scalable treatment option, but have not been evaluated within the context of COVID-19. This study aimed to investigate the uptake and effectiveness of the Reboot Online chronic pain program before and during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Retrospective cohort analyses were conducted on routine service users of the Reboot Online program, comparing those who commenced the program during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020–March 2021), to those prior to the pandemic (April 2017–March 2020). Outcomes included the number of course registrations; commencements; completion rates; and measures of pain severity, interference, self-efficacy, pain-related disability, and distress. Results Data from 2,585 course users were included (n = 1138 pre-COVID-19 and n = 1,447 during-COVID-19). There was a 287% increase in monthly course registrations during COVID-19, relative to previously. Users were younger, and more likely to reside in a metropolitan area during COVID-19, but initial symptom severity was comparable. Course adherence and effectiveness were similar before and during COVID-19, with moderate effect size improvements in clinical outcomes post-treatment (g =  0.23–0.55). Discussion Uptake of an online chronic pain management program substantially increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Program adherence and effectiveness were similar pre- and during-COVID. These findings support the effectiveness and scalability of online chronic pain management programs to meet increasing demand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Persistent activity limitations are common among road trauma survivors, yet access to rehabilitation in hospital and in the community remains variable. This study aimed to identify unmet rehabilitation needs following road trauma and assess the feasibility of a novel rehabilitation consultation service delivered via telehealth following hospitalization. A pilot cohort study was conducted with survivors of road trauma who were hospitalized but did not receive formal inpatient rehabilitation. All participants received a multidisciplinary rehabilitation consultation via telehealth 1–3 weeks post-discharge, to assess rehabilitation needs and initiate treatment referrals as required. Functional and qualitative outcomes were assessed at baseline (1–7 days); one month and three months post-discharge. 38 participants were enrolled. All (100%) reported functional limitations at baseline; 86.5% were found to have unmet rehabilitation needs, and 75.7% were recommended rehabilitation interventions. Functional ability improved over time, but more than half the cohort continued to report activity limitations (67.6%), pain (64.7%) and/or altered mood (41.2%) for up to three months. Participants found the telehealth service to be acceptable, convenient, and helpful for recovery. A high proportion of mild-moderate trauma survivors report unmet rehabilitation needs following hospital discharge. Telehealth appears to be a feasible, convenient and acceptable mode of assessing these needs. Survivors of road-related injuries often experience ongoing impairments and activity limitations. Among those who don't receive rehabilitation in hospital, we found a high proportion (86.5%) had unmet rehabilitation needs after discharge. A telehealth rehabilitation service was feasible to deliver and could successfully identify unmet rehabilitation needs. The piloted telehealth intervention was viewed as acceptable, convenient and beneficial by patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to describe differences in long-term outcomes for patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) following stroke compared to patients discharged directly home or to residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Cohort study. Data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry were linked to hospital admissions records and the national death index. Main outcomes: death and hospital readmissions up to 12 months post-admission, Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) 90-180 days post-admission. Of 8,555 included patients (median age 75, 55% male, 83% ischemic stroke), 4,405 (51.5%) were discharged home, 3,442 (40.2%) to IRFs, and 708 (8.3%) to RACFs. No between-group differences were observed in hazard of death between patients discharged to IRFs versus home. Fewer patients discharged to IRFs were readmitted to hospital within 90, 180 or 365-days compared to patients discharged home (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR]:90-days 0.54, 95%CI 0.49, 0.61; aSHR:180-days 0.74, 95%CI 0.67, 0.82; aSHR:365-days 0.85, 95%CI 0.78, 0.93). Fewer patients discharged to IRFs reported problems with mobility compared to those discharged home (adjusted OR 0.54, 95%CI 0.47, 0.63), or to RACFs (aOR 0.35, 95%CI 0.25, 0.48). Overall HRQoL between 90-180 days was worse for people discharged to IRFs versus those discharged home and better than those discharged to RACFs. Several long-term outcomes differed significantly for patients discharged to different settings after stroke. Patients discharged to IRFs reported some better outcomes than people discharge directly home despite having markers of more severe stroke. People with mild strokes are usually discharged directly home, people with moderate severity strokes to inpatient rehabilitation, and people with very severe strokes are usually discharged to residential aged care facilities. People discharged to inpatient rehabilitation reported fewer problems with mobility and had a reduced risk of hospital readmission in the first year post-stroke compared to people discharged directly home after stroke. The median self-reported health-related quality of life for people discharged to residential aged care equated to 'worst health state imaginable'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]