Search

INTRODUCTION: The Banned Drinker Register (BDR) was reintroduced in the Northern Territory (NT) in September 2017. The BDR is a supply reduction measure and involves placing people who consume alcohol at harmful levels on a register prohibiting the purchase, possession and consumption of alcohol. The current study aims to evaluate the impacts of the reintroduction of the BDR, in the context of other major alcohol policy initiatives introduced across the NT such as Police Auxiliary Liquor Inspectors and a minimum unit price for alcohol of US$1.30 per standard drink. METHODS AND ANALYSES: The Learning from Alcohol (policy) Reforms in the Northern Territory project will use a mixed-methods approach and contain four major components: epidemiological analysis of trends over time (outcomes include health, justice and social welfare data); individual-level data linkage including those on the BDR (outcomes include health and justice data); qualitative interviews with key stakeholders in the NT (n≥50); and qualitative interviews among people who are, or were previously, on the BDR, as well as the families and communities connected to those on the BDR (n=150). The impacts of the BDR on epidemiological data will be examined using time series analysis. Linked data will use generalised mixed models to analyse the relationship between outcomes and exposures, utilising appropriate distributions. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approvals have been obtained from NT Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), Central Australia HREC and Deakin University HREC. In addition to peer-reviewed publications, we will report our findings to key organisational, policy, government and community stakeholders via conferences, briefings and lay summaries.

Introduction: Recent randomized trials showing improved outcomes for later-presenting acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with endovascular clot retrieval (ECR) may result in substantial increases in CTP utilization. This 3-hospital, single-institution cohort study aimed to compare 2017 and 2018 patient cohorts for the following: CTP use in AIS. Prevalence of LVO in all patients having CTP. Number and clinical characteristics of patients triaged to ECR. Number of patients receiving CTP relative to similar-acuity total ED presentations. Method(s): Inclusion criteria: Consecutive adult emergency (ED) patients receiving CTP for suspected AIS. Study period 1:1 January-30 June 2017; Period 2:1 January-30 June 2018. Data collection: age, gender, triage category, NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Score), symptoms/signs, time elapsed since last seen well (TESLSW) to triage, disposition (home/other). Result(s): A 38.7 % increase in CTP (512 in 2017, 710 in 2018) occurred with 39/512 (7.6%) and 72/710 (10.1%) having intended ECR. CTPs per intended ECR declined from 13.1 to 9.9. 36/512 (7.0%) and 58/710 (8.2%) patients had ECR (61.1% increase) and 22/36 (61.1%) and 25/58 (43.1%) of these were discharged home in 2017 and 2018, respectively, an increase of 3/22(14%). Conclusion(s): Despite a 38.7% increase in CTP utilization, we experienced a reduction in the number of CTPs performed/patient triaged to ECR. This did not reflect higher LVO prevalence among later presenters but may reflect changed selection criteria for CTP and/or decision making about suitability for ECR.Copyright © 2020 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists