Search

Aim: Investigate the relationship between response to pembrolizumab and expression of the 18-gene T cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TcellinfGEP) or PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) in esophageal cancer. Materials & methods: This analysis included heavily pretreated patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who received pembrolizumab in the single-arm, phase II study KEYNOTE-180. PD-L1 CPS was evaluated with PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. Results: In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, trends toward enrichment for responders were observed for patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 tumors. In patients with adenocarcinoma, a trend was observed for TcellinfGEP but not for PD-L1. Conclusion: TcellinfGEP and PD-L1 CPS may enrich for responders to pembrolizumab in patients with esophageal cancer. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02559687 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

Supplementary Figure from PD-1 Blockade in Solid Tumors with Defects in Polymerase Epsilon

Supplementary Data from PD-1 Blockade in Solid Tumors with Defects in Polymerase Epsilon

Missense mutations in the polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene have been reported to generate proofreading defects resulting in an ultramutated genome and to sensitize tumors to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. However, many POLE-mutated tumors do not respond to such treatment. To better understand the link between POLE mutation variants and response to immunotherapy, we prospectively assessed the efficacy of nivolumab in a multicenter clinical trial in patients bearing advanced mismatch repair–proficient POLE-mutated solid tumors. We found that only tumors harboring selective POLE pathogenic mutations in the DNA binding or catalytic site of the exonuclease domain presented high mutational burden with a specific single-base substitution signature, high T-cell infiltrates, and a high response rate to anti–PD-1 monotherapy. This study illustrates how specific DNA repair defects sensitize to immunotherapy. POLE proofreading deficiency represents a novel agnostic biomarker for response to PD-1 checkpoint blockade therapy.Significance:POLE proofreading deficiency leads to high tumor mutational burden with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and predicts anti–PD-1 efficacy in mismatch repair–proficient tumors. Conversely, tumors harboring POLE mutations not affecting proofreading derived no benefit from PD-1 blockade. POLE proofreading deficiency is a new tissue-agnostic biomarker for cancer immunotherapy.See related video: https://vimeo.com/720727355This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1397

Figure S2 shows the ROC curve analysis of progression prediction according to the HPV ctDNA level at baseline. (AUC was 0.646 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.802) and 2940 copies/ml was determined as the ctDNA cut-off level for comparison. Sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off were 67% and 70% respectively).

Purpose:Human papillomavirus (HPV) is found in 90% of squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal (SCCA). We investigated the clinical validity of HPV circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in patients enrolled in the Epitopes-HPV02 trial that demonstrated the efficacy of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU as first-line chemotherapy in advanced SCCA.Experimental Design:According to the protocol, serum samples were collected before chemotherapy and on completion of chemotherapy. HPV16 ctDNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and correlated with prospectively registered patient characteristics and outcomes. A landmark was set at the time of chemotherapy completion for postchemotherapy progression-free survival (PFS) analyses.Results:Among 57 patients with HPV16-related advanced SCCA, HPV ctDNA was detected in 91.1% (95% confidence interval, 81.1–96.2) of baseline samples. Baseline HPV ctDNA levels were not associated with any patient characteristics; baseline ctDNA level below the cutoff obtained by AUC (area under the curve) was associated with a longer PFS (HR = 2.1; P = 0.04). Among the 36 patients who completed 5 months of chemotherapy, residual HPV ctDNA was detected after chemotherapy in 38.9% of patients. Residual HPV ctDNA detected at chemotherapy completion was associated with shorter postchemotherapy PFS (median PFS 3.4 months vs. not reached; HR = 5.5; P < 0.001) and a reduction of 1-year overall survival rate (OR = 7.0; P = 0.02).Conclusions:This prospective study in advanced SCCA demonstrated a significant prognostic impact of HPV ctDNA level before first-line chemotherapy and HPV ctDNA negativity after chemotherapy completion. With a limited cost and short turnaround, this assay is a promising tool to optimize the therapeutic management of SCCA.See related commentary by Morris, p. 2030

Supplementary materials and figures

Summary Background Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy controls local disease, but distant metastases remain common. We aimed to assess whether administering neoadjuvant chemotherapy before preoperative chemoradiotherapy could reduce the risk of distant recurrences. Methods We did a phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial at 35 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were adults aged 18–75 years and had newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven, rectal adenocarcinoma staged cT3 or cT4 M0, with a WHO performance status of 0–1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group or standard-of-care group, using an independent web-based system by minimisation method stratified by centre, extramural extension of the tumour into perirectal fat according to MRI, tumour location, and stage. Investigators and participants were not masked to treatment allocation. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 intravenously every 14 days for 6 cycles), chemoradiotherapy (50 Gy during 5 weeks and 800 mg/m2 concurrent oral capecitabine twice daily for 5 days per week), total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant chemotherapy (3 months of modified FOLFOX6 [intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and leucovorin 400 mg/m2, followed by intravenous 400 mg/m2 fluorouracil bolus and then continuous infusion at a dose of 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h every 14 days for six cycles] or capecitabine [1250 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1–14 every 21 days]). The standard-of-care group received chemoradiotherapy, total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant chemotherapy (for 6 months). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population at 3 years. Safety analyses were done on treated patients. This trial was registered with EudraCT (2011-004406-25) and ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01804790 ) and is now complete. Findings Between June 5, 2012, and June 26, 2017, 461 patients were randomly assigned to either the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (n=231) or the standard-of-care group (n=230). At a median follow-up of 46·5 months (IQR 35·4–61·6), 3-year disease-free survival rates were 76% (95% CI 69–81) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 69% (62–74) in the standard-of-care group (stratified hazard ratio 0·69, 95% CI 0·49–0·97; p=0·034). During neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (38 [17%] of 225 patients) and diarrhoea (25 [11%] of 226). During chemoradiotherapy, the most common grade 3–4 adverse event was lymphopenia (59 [28%] of 212 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group vs 67 [30%] of 226 patients in the standard-of-care group). During adjuvant chemotherapy, the most common grade 3–4 adverse events were lymphopenia (18 [11%] of 161 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group vs 42 [27%] of 155 in the standard-of-care group), neutropenia (nine [6%] of 161 vs 28 [18%] of 155), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (19 [12%] of 162 vs 32 [21%] of 155). Serious adverse events occurred in 63 (27%) of 231 participants in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 50 (22%) of 230 patients in the standard-of-care group (p=0·167), during the whole treatment period. During adjuvant therapy, serious adverse events occurred in 18 (11%) of 163 participants in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 36 (23%) of 158 patients in the standard-of-care group (p=0·0049). Treatment-related deaths occurred in one ( Interpretation Intensification of chemotherapy using FOLFIRINOX before preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly improved outcomes compared with preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT3 or cT4 M0 rectal cancer. The significantly improved disease-free survival in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and the decreased neurotoxicity indicates that the perioperative approach is more efficient and better tolerated than adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, the PRODIGE 23 results might change clinical practice. Funding Institut National du Cancer, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and R&D Unicancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have failed in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients except those with dMMR/MSI tumors. However, until very recently we had only non-comparative promising data in this population with anti-programmed cell death 1/ programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1) antibodies alone or combined with anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) antibodies. This comparative phase II trial (NCT 03186326), conducted in more than 100 centers in France, will include dMMR/MSI mCRC patients with progression after a first-line treatment with chemotherapy ± targeted therapies, to evaluate efficacy and safety of the anti-PDL1 Avelumab versus a standard second-line treatment. Main inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 to 75 years, ECOG performance status ≤2, dMMR/MSI mCRC and failure of a standard first-line regimen. Patient will be randomised to receive Avelumab 10 mg/kg versus standard second-line doublet chemotherapy plus a targeted agent according to tumor RAS status. Patients will be followed for 4 years. A gain of 5 months in median PFS is expected in favour of the Avelumab arm (12 vs 7 months; HR=0.58). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity. In addition, circulating tumour DNA and microbiota will be explored to test their potential prognostic and predictive values. The study was opened in March 2018.

Missense mutations in the polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene have been reported to generate proofreading defects resulting in an ultramutated genome and to sensitize tumors to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. However, many POLE-mutated tumors do not respond to such treatment. To better understand the link between POLE mutation variants and response to immunotherapy, we prospectively assessed the efficacy of nivolumab in a multicenter clinical trial in patients bearing advanced mismatch repair–proficient POLE-mutated solid tumors. We found that only tumors harboring selective POLE pathogenic mutations in the DNA binding or catalytic site of the exonuclease domain presented high mutational burden with a specific single-base substitution signature, high T-cell infiltrates, and a high response rate to anti–PD-1 monotherapy. This study illustrates how specific DNA repair defects sensitize to immunotherapy. POLE proofreading deficiency represents a novel agnostic biomarker for response to PD-1 checkpoint blockade therapy. Significance: POLE proofreading deficiency leads to high tumor mutational burden with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and predicts anti–PD-1 efficacy in mismatch repair–proficient tumors. Conversely, tumors harboring POLE mutations not affecting proofreading derived no benefit from PD-1 blockade. POLE proofreading deficiency is a new tissue-agnostic biomarker for cancer immunotherapy. See related video: https://vimeo.com/720727355 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1397

BACKGROUND: First-line chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma results in poor outcomes. The monoclonal antibody nivolumab has shown an overall survival benefit over chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nivolumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus the monoclonal antibody ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival, as determined by blinded independent central review. Hierarchical testing was performed first in patients with tumor-cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of 1% or greater and then in the overall population (all randomly assigned patients). RESULTS: A total of 970 patients underwent randomization. At a 13-month minimum follow-up, overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone, both among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (median, 15.4 vs. 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.54; 99.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.80; P

290 Background: NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) vs chemo in CheckMate 648 (NCT03143153), leading to approvals in the US, EU, Japan, and other countries. We report longer follow-up results. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC were randomized to NIVO (240 mg Q2W) + chemo (fluorouracil + cisplatin Q4W), NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W) or chemo. Primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review (BICR). Hierarchical testing was done first in patients (pts) with tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 1%, then in all randomized pts. Results: 970 pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo, NIVO + IPI, or chemo. With 29-mo minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI continued to show improvement in OS vs chemo, including higher 24-mo OS rates, in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% and all randomized pts. Responses were more durable and a larger proportion of responders had a duration of response (DOR) ≥ 24 mo with NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% (22%, 36%, 13%, respectively) and all randomized pts (21%, 29%, 13%). Additional efficacy data by PD-L1 status will be presented. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 96% (grade 3/4, 49%) of pts with NIVO + chemo, 80% (33%) with NIVO + IPI, and 90% (36%) with chemo. Any-grade TRAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 35% of pts with NIVO + chemo, 19% with NIVO + IPI, and 21% with chemo. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 2% of pts in each arm. Conclusions: NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful survival benefit vs chemo, durable objective responses, and acceptable safety profiles with longer follow-up. This further supports each regimen as a new 1L treatment option for advanced ESCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03143153 . [Table: see text]

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare disease often diagnosed at a localised stage. For locally advanced recurrence or metastatic disease, DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) demonstrated high efficacy and became one of the standard regimens. However, there is no standard of care in the second line.In the Epitopes-HPV01 and Epitopes-HPV02 prospective trials, 115 patients with advanced SCCA were treated with a DCF regimen in the first line. In these studies, second-line data were registered per protocol.After a median follow-up of40 months, at progression, 73 patients received a second-line (L2) treatment. In this L2 population, median overall survival (mOS) was 13.5 months (95%CI 9.4-19.8), and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.7 months (3.4-7.3) in L2. Fourteen patients presented an oligometastatic progression and were treated with an ablative treatment (surgery or radiotherapy); mOS was 48.3 months (NE-NE), and mPFS was 31.3 months (23.2-NE). Fifty-nine patients received a systemic treatment (chemotherapy or immunotherapy); mOS was 11 months (8.4-15.4) and mPFS was 4.9 months (3.3-7). The most frequent chemotherapy regimens were the reintroduction of DCF, paclitaxel, FOLFIRI and mitomycin plus fluoropyrimidine. No significant difference was observed between regimens (p = 0.26). Six patients received anti-PD1/L1-based immunotherapy.Second-line treatments are effective in patients with SCCA. Ablative treatment is feasible and is probably the best option for patients with oligometastatic progression. If this is not possible, systemic therapy by an anti-PD1/L1 immunotherapy or chemotherapy can be recommended. Reintroduction of DCF, paclitaxel, FOLFIRI or mitomycin-C plus fluoropyrimidine are possible options.

Background and purpose Standard treatment of epidermoid anal cancer is 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) based chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This phase I study aims to evaluate the addition of panitumumab (Pmab) to CRT and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Pmab and 5-FU in combination with CRT. Materials and methods Immunocompetent patients with locally advanced tumour without metastases (Stage T2, T3 or T4, whatever N stage; Stage N1–N3 whatever T stage) followed two RT periods (45 Gy in 5 weeks and 20 Gy in 2 weeks, separated by a 2-week break) with concomitant CT sessions of 5FU/MMC at RT weeks 1, 5 and 8. Pmab was administered on RT weeks 1, 3, 5, 8 and 10 according to a predefined dose escalation schedule. Results Ten patients were enroled. One was excluded due to unmet dose constraints respect. Three patients received dose level (DL) 0 (Pmab 3 mg/kg + 5FU 600 mg/m2/day) and six received DL-1 (Pmab 3 mg/kg + 5FU 400 mg/m2/day). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in all patients at DL 0 and 2 at DL-1. Most common grade 3–4 toxicities observed at DL 0 were haematologic (100%), dermatitis (67%), and anaemia (67%). No death occurred. Four months after ending CRT, five and two patients had a local complete response and a partial response, respectively. One patient had a colostomy with abdomino-perineal amputation due to a tumour recurrence. Conclusions The MTD is 5FU at 400 mg/m2/day, MMC at 10 mg/m2 and Pmab at 3 mg/kg. The effect of the MTD on tumour response is evaluated in the phase 2 study.

Purpose: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is found in 90% of squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal (SCCA). We investigated the clinical validity of HPV circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in patients enrolled in the Epitopes-HPV02 trial that demonstrated the efficacy of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU as first-line chemotherapy in advanced SCCA. Experimental Design: According to the protocol, serum samples were collected before chemotherapy and on completion of chemotherapy. HPV16 ctDNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and correlated with prospectively registered patient characteristics and outcomes. A landmark was set at the time of chemotherapy completion for postchemotherapy progression-free survival (PFS) analyses. Results: Among 57 patients with HPV16-related advanced SCCA, HPV ctDNA was detected in 91.1% (95% confidence interval, 81.1–96.2) of baseline samples. Baseline HPV ctDNA levels were not associated with any patient characteristics; baseline ctDNA level below the cutoff obtained by AUC (area under the curve) was associated with a longer PFS (HR = 2.1; P = 0.04). Among the 36 patients who completed 5 months of chemotherapy, residual HPV ctDNA was detected after chemotherapy in 38.9% of patients. Residual HPV ctDNA detected at chemotherapy completion was associated with shorter postchemotherapy PFS (median PFS 3.4 months vs. not reached; HR = 5.5; P < 0.001) and a reduction of 1-year overall survival rate (OR = 7.0; P = 0.02). Conclusions: This prospective study in advanced SCCA demonstrated a significant prognostic impact of HPV ctDNA level before first-line chemotherapy and HPV ctDNA negativity after chemotherapy completion. With a limited cost and short turnaround, this assay is a promising tool to optimize the therapeutic management of SCCA. See related commentary by Morris, p. 2030

International audience; Gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas present poor overall survival (OS). First-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with HER2-negative tumours is based on a doublet or triplet of fluoropyrimidine plus platinum salt ± taxane. Second-line chemotherapy (Docetaxel or Irinotecan) improves OS which nonetheless remains poor (around 5 months). The first results of immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1) combined with chemotherapy in metastatic gastric and GEJ cancers were discordant in recent phase III trials. Data on dual-blockade (anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4) plus chemotherapy are lacking. DURIGAST is a randomised, multicenter, non-comparative, phase II study, evaluating safety and efficacy of FOLFIRI plus Durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) versus FOLFIRI plus Durvalumab and Tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) as second-line treatment of advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary objective is the rate of patients alive and without progression at 4 months. The main inclusion criteria are: patients with advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, pre-treated with fluoropyrimidine + platinum salt ± taxane. Due to a lack of data on FOLFIRI, Durvalumab and Tremelimumab combination, a 2-step safety run-in phase has been performed before the randomised phase II. The safety run-in phase did not show any safety issue and the randomised phase II starts in September 2020.

Context: Polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene missense hotspot mutations can generate pathogenic (p) proofreading defects resulting in hypermutated genomic profiles. Aim: Determine the prevalence, genomic consequences and immunotherapy sensitivity of advanced POLE mutated tumors according to mutation site, primary tumor and tumor mutational burden (TMB). Results: Pan-Cancer TCGA & MSKCC databases genomic analyses found a prevalence of non-pathogenic POLE mutations (POLEnp) of 3.4% with median TMB of 11 mutations/Megabase (mt/Mb, IQR 3-34). Pathogenic POLE mutations (POLEp) prevalence was 0.4% with median TMB of 215 mt/Mb (IQR 107-324), predominantly in colorectal and endometrial cancers. Prevalence dropped to 0.1% in metastatic cancers. We assessed prospectively the efficacy of PD-1 blockade in mismatch repair proficient advanced solid tumors harboring POLE missense mutations (phase II ASCe Nivolumab trial; NCT03012581). Variants were categorized prospectively by a molecular board as POLEp, POLEnp or Variants with Unknown significance (VUS). The primary endpoint was the Overall Response Rate (ORR) at 12 weeks according to RECIST 1.1, and secondary endpoints included survival analyses according to POLE variants pathogenicity. Among 61 screened patients, 21 were eligible and 20 received Nivolumab and 19 were assessable for response (table 1). The 12-week ORR was 37% for patients harboring POLEp and VUS and resulted in major survival improvement compared to POLEnp patients (HR=0.1 ; CI95% 0.02-0.7); see results in Table 1. Among patients POLEp tumors, while higher TMB was not predictive of response, higher proportion of POLE-related mutational signature correlated with improved benefit. In silico exonucleasic POLE domain analyses confirmed that all POLEp and 2 VUS clustered in the DNA binding or the Catalytic site. Recategorizing the VUS according to the location within the exonucleasic domain improved the prediction of survival outcomes. Impact: This study gives new insights on how DNA repair defects, mutational burden and signatures sensitize to PD-1 blockade and may offer emerging tumor agnostic biomarkers for benefit to checkpoint blockade. POLE variant pathogenicity All(N=21) POLEnp(N=5) VUS(N=4) POLEp(N=12) Age, years ± SD 57 ± 16 64 ± 10 56 ± 16 54 ± 17 Sex, Male (%) 12 (57) 5 (100) 2 (50) 5 (42) PS (ECOG)=1 (%) 16 (75) 4 (80) 2 (50) 10 (83) Primary tumor Colorectal 9 (43) 2 (40) 2 (50) 5 (42) Endometrial 6 (29) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (50) Gastric 2 (9) 2 (40) 0 (0) 0 (0) Glial 1 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (8) Biliary tract 1 (5) 0 (0) 1 (25) 0 (0) Pancreas 2 (9) 1 (20) 1 (25) 0 (0) Number of previous treatments 2.4 ± 2 5 ± 2 1.8 ± 1 1.5 ± 1 TMB (mt/Mb, Min-Max)(N=16) 36.2 (2-385) 5 (4-9) 3 (2-4) 114 (25-385) ORR at 12 weeks (CR+PR) 37%(N=7/19) 0%(N=0/5) 50%(N=2/4) 46%(5/10) DCR at 12 weeks (CR+PR+SD) 58%(N=11/19) 0%(N=0/5) 75%(N=3/4) 80%(8/10) Median Progresssion-Free survival (months) 5.6 2.3 10.3vs POLEnp: HR=0.2 IC95% 0.1-0.7 Median Overall Survival (months) 9.1 5.0 Not Reachedvs POLEnp:HR=0.1 IC95% 0.02-0.7 Citation Format: Benoît Rousseau, Ivan Bieche, Eric Pasmant, Nadim Hamzaoui, Nicolas Leulliot, Lucas Michon, Aurelien de Reynies, Mike Foote, Julien Masliah-Planchon, Magali Svrcek, Romain Cohen, Victor Simmet, Paule Augereau, David Malka, Antoine Hollebecque, Damien Pouessel, Carlos Gomez-Roca, Rosine Guimbaud, Amandine Bruyas, Marielle Guillet, Muriel Duluc, Sophie Cousin, Christelle de la Fourchardiere, Frederic Rolland, Sandrine Hiret, Esma Saada-Bouzid, Olivier Bouche, Thierry Andre, Diane Pannier, Farid El Hajbi, Stephane Oudard, Christophe Tournigand, Jean-Charles Soria, Drew Gerber, Dennis Stephens, Michelle Lamandola-Essel, Steven B Maron, Bill Diplas, Guillem Argiles, Asha Krishnan, Neil Segal, Andrea Cercek, Nathalie Hoog-Labouret, Frederic Legrand, Clotide Simon, Assia Lamrani-Ghaouti, Luis A. Diaz, Pierre Saintigny, Sylvie Chevret, Aurelien Marabelle. PD-1 blockade in solid tumors with defects in polymerase epsilon [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT021.

4035 Background: NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit vs chemo in previously untreated patients (pts) with advanced ESCC in the phase 3 CheckMate 648 study. We report expanded results from the primary analysis with 13-month (mo) minimum follow-up. Methods: Pts with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC were randomized to NIVO (240 mg Q2W) + chemo (fluorouracil + cisplatin Q4W), NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), or chemo. Primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 1%. Secondary endpoints planned for hierarchical testing included OS, PFS, and objective response rate (ORR) per BICR in all randomized pts. Duration of response (DOR) per BICR and PFS2 per investigator (time from randomization to progression after subsequent systemic therapy, initiation of second subsequent systemic therapy, or death) were exploratory endpoints. Results: Among all pts randomized to NIVO + chemo (n = 321), NIVO + IPI (n = 325), or chemo (n = 324), PFS2 favored NIVO + chemo (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54–0.77) and NIVO + IPI (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62–0.88) vs chemo. ORR (95% CI) was 47% (42–53), 28% (23–33), and 27% (22–32), respectively. More responders with NIVO + chemo or NIVO + IPI vs chemo had prolonged DOR (≥12 mo; 39%, 48%, and 23%, respectively). Efficacy data by tumor cell PD-L1 and PD-L1 combined positive score will be presented. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events with potential immunologic etiology (select TRAEs) occurred in ≤ 6% of pts with NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI, and non-endocrine select TRAEs resolved in 57%–95% of pts across organ categories (Table). Conclusions: NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI demonstrated favorable PFS2 and a higher proportion of pts with prolonged DOR vs chemo, as well as acceptable safety profiles. These results provide further support for each regimen as a new potential 1L standard of care in advanced ESCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03143153. [Table: see text]

4036 Background: Efficacy of 2nd line chemotherapy in advanced gastric/gastro-oesphageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains limited. No study up until now has evaluated the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as 2ndline treatment of advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods: DURIGAST PRODIGE 59 is a randomized, multicenter, phase II study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of FOLFIRI plus durvalumab (anti-PD-L1 until progression) (FD) versus FOLFIRI plus durvalumab and tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4 for 4 cycles) (FDT). Key eligibility criteria included advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, platinum-based first-line chemotherapy and ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to FD versus FDT. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months, which was expected to be 70% (H0:50%). With an α risk of 5%, a power of 85% and 5% of non-evaluable patients, 47 evaluable patients are needed by arm. Secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival (OS) and quality of life. Results: Between August 2020 and June 2021, 96 patients were randomized, 48 in each arm. The median age was 59.7 years, 30.4% were women and 66.3% ECOG PS 1. All in all, 22.8% had HER2+ tumors and 4.3% dMMR/MSI tumors. The 4-month PFS were 44.7% [90%CI: 32.3–57.7] and 57.8% [90%CI: 44.5–70.3] in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. Primary endpoint was not met. Median PFS were 3.8 and 5.9 months, disease control rates 68.9% and 73.8% and median OS not reached and 10.1 months in FD and FDT arms, respectively. Eight patients in FDT arm had tremelimumab re-introduction at progression. Twenty-one patients, 8 in FD arm and 13 in FDT arm, are still being treated with a median duration of treatment of 7.8 and 10.9 months. All in all, 50.0% and 47.8% of patients experienced at least one grade 3-4 adverse events related to the treatment (neutropenia: 13.0 vs 21.7%, anemia: 10.9 vs 6.5%, diarrhea: 2.2 vs 8.7% and vomiting: 6.5 vs 10.9%), in FD and FDT arms, respectively. In both arms there was no clinically significant deterioration of quality of life superior to 10 points according to EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status. Conclusions: The DURIGAST PRODIGE 59 trial demonstrates an acceptable safety profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus FOLFIRI in 2nd line treatment for advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. FDT combination demonstrates a clinically relevant efficacy never before achieved with a median PFS of 6 months and should be evaluated in a phase III trial. Updated results including PFS according to centralized review and PD-L1 status will be presented during ASCO meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03959293.

3508 Background: Modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (mDCF) regimen is one of the first-line standard regimens for the treatment of metastatic or unresectable locally advanced recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) after demonstrating an improved efficacy (12-month PFS of 47%) in the Epitopes-HPV02 trial. Antibodies targeting the checkpoint inhibitor (CKI) programmed cell death protein-1 have been shown to be effective as monotherapy in advanced SCCA, refractory to chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of atezolizumab and mDCF as first-line treatment. Methods: This is a 2:1 randomized, non-comparative, multicenter, phase II study (NCT03519295) with an experimental arm (Arm A, mDCF plus atezolizumab) and standard arm (Arm B, mDCF). Patients with chemo-naive SCCA, metastatic or unresectable locally advanced recurrence were eligible. In Arm A, survival probabilities for null and alternative hypotheses for the primary endpoint 12-months PFS rate were 35 and 50%, respectively. Using one-arm non-parametric survival with unilateral alpha type I error of 5% and a statistical power of 81%, 64 patients in 2 years with 1 year of follow-up need to be randomized in Arm A. The lowest expected critical value would be a PFS rate of 46% to reject H0. In both arms, 8 cycles of mDCF were administered. In Arm A, patients received a fixed dose of atezolizumab (800 mg every 2 weeks) before each mDCF cycle and were followed up to 1 year. Results: Ninety-sevenevaluable patients were enrolled, 64 in Arm A and 33 in Arm B. The median age was 64.1 years, 73.2% were women, and 78,3% had a metastatic disease. More patients in Arm A had an ECOG-PS 1 (42.2% vs 27.3%), liver involvement (56.9% vs 48%), and an extensive local recurrence (23.5% vs 8%). The median follow-up was 22.3 months (95% CI 20.8-24.8).The 12-month PFS rate was 44.2% (90% CI 33.7-54.2) and 43.2% (90% CI 28.5-57.0) in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, and the 12-month OS rate was 77.7% (95% CI 68.1-88.7) and 80.8% (95% CI 68.1-95.9).The objective response rate was 74.6% and 78.1% in Arm A and Arm B, respectively. A high dose-intensity and a good safety profile were observed in both arms. Grade ≥3 toxicities were observed in 59.0% and 36.4% of patients in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, with no toxic death. Conclusions: The results of SCARCE trial are consistent with previous results of mDCF, with high efficacy and safety at first-line in patients with advanced SCCA. However, the concomitant addition of CKI did not make a significant clinical impact at 12 months. Updated results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03519295.

4015 Background: Preoperative CRT with a FU/platinum regimen has been used for years for esophageal or junctional cancer before the CP regimen became a standard of care following the results of the CROSS study (van Hagen 2012). We aimed at evaluating the complete resection (R0) rate and severe postoperative morbidity rate associated with these 2 neoadjuvant regimens, each being combined with the radiation (RT) regime used in the CROSS trial. Methods: PROTECT is a multicenter, randomized, non-comparative, phase 2 trial (NCT02359968) in patients (pts) with resectable esophageal or Siewert type I-II junctional cancer, stage II (T1-2N1 or T3N0) or stage III (T3N1 or T4anyN) tumors (UICC-7 classification), and ECOG PS ≤2. Following randomization (balanced by ECOG PS 0 vs 1-2, stage II vs III, squamous-cell (SCC) vs adenocarcinoma (ADK), center), pts received CP (AUC2 CBP plus PCL 50mg/m² / week x 5 weeks), or Fx (FU 400 mg/m² bolus Day 1, then FU 1600 mg/m² continuous infusion over 2 days, plus OX 85 mg/m², and Folinic acid 200 mg/m², 2-h infusion, Day 1; 3 cycles every 2 weeks). RT technique was similar in both arms: 3D-conformal as published in the CROSS trial or IMRT (n = 35); total dose of 41.4Gy, 5 fractions of 1.8Gy / week, starting at Day 1 of chemotherapy. Surgery was performed 4 to 8 weeks after completion of CRT through a transthoracic or mini-invasive approach with a two field extended lymphadenectomy. Co-primary endpoints were R0 (failure: R1 or disease progression under CRT), and severe postoperative morbidity rate ≤30 days after surgery (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III). Based on a Bryant and Day 2-stage design (p0 = 75% and p1 = 90% for resection; p0 = 45% and p1 = 25% for morbidity; α = 10% and β = 15%), 48 evaluable pts were required by arm. Results: 100/104 pts recruited from 02/2015 to 08/2020, started the study treatment: 50 CP & 50 Fx. Overall, median age = 64 (range, 33-79); 82/100 males; 62 ADK and 38 SCC; 66 esophageal and 34 junctional site; 31 stage II; 68 stage III, 1 Nx. R0 resection was obtained in 46/50 CP pts (92.0%, 95% CI: 80.8-97.8%), and in 42/48 Fx pts (87.5%, 74.8-95.3%); 2 non evaluable pts because of event unrelated to disease progression. Severe postoperative adverse events (AEs) occurred in 34/91 pts who underwent surgery: 21/48 CP (43.8%, 29.5-58.8%) and 13/43 Fx (30.2%, 17.2-46.1%). Severe AEs were respiratory disorders (CP 26%; Fx 26%), esophageal fistula (CP 18%; Fx 6%), infection (CP 5%; Fx 3%), haemorrhage (CP 5%; Fx 0%) and gastric tube necrosis (CP 6%; Fx 3%). 5 pts died from AEs (3 CP, 2 Fx). A TRG1-2 was observed in 29/48 (60.4%, 95% CI: 44.3-74.2%) CP pts, and in 19/43 (44.2%, 29.1-60.1%) Fx pts. Conclusions: When combined to preoperative radiation therapy at 41.4Gy, both regimens (CP and Fx) provided short-term benefit on R0 resection; however, CP is associated with a severe postoperative morbidity rate higher than expected. Clinical trial information: NCT02359968.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as monotherapy in 2nd line treatment for gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is low, with no evaluation of efficacy and safety of ICI combined with chemotherapy. The DURIGAST PRODIGE 59 study is a randomised, multicentre, phase II study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of FOLFIRI + Durvalumab +/− Tremelimumab as 2nd line treatment of patients with advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Here, we report data from the safety run-in phase with FOLFIRI Durvalumab (arm A) or FOLFIRI Durvalumab and Tremelimumab (arm B). Among the 11 patients included, 63.6% experienced at least one grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) related to the treatment, most frequently neutropenia (36.4%). There was only one immune-related AE (grade 2 hyperthyroidism). Ten serious AEs were described among six patients, but only two were related to the treatment, due to the chemotherapy. One seizure epilepsy related to a brain metastasis was observed, but was not related by the investigator to the treatment. However, the Independent Data Monitoring Committee recommended brain imaging at inclusion. This safety run-in phase demonstrates an expected safety profile of FOLFIRI with Durvalumab +/− Tremelimumab combination allowing the randomised phase II.

Background Modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (mDCF) regimen has become a new standard for the treatment of metastatic or unresectable locally advanced recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) after demonstrating improved efficacy (12-month PFS of 47%) in the Epitopes-HPV02 trial. Antibodies targeting the checkpoint inhibitor (CKI) programmed cell death protein-1 (PD1) have demonstrated the efficacy as monotherapies in second-line treatment of SCCA. The aim of this study is to evaluate the combination of atezolizumab and mDCF as first-line chemotherapy in a non-comparative multicentre randomized phase II study of advanced SCCA patients. Methods Patients with chemo-naive advanced histologically proven SCCA, metastatic or unresectable locally advanced recurrence, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status (ECOG-PS) Discussion Although the Epitopes-HPV02 trial has changed long-lasting prognosis of patients with SCCA in advanced stage disease, more than 50% of patients will progress at 12 months. The purpose of the SCARCE trial to establish the addition of atezolizumab to mDCF as a new standard in this rare disease. Associated biomarker studies and the control arm could contribute to better understanding of the potential synergic and tumour resistance mechanisms in SCCA. Trial registration NCT03519295.

Background Our study describes the feasibility and efficacy of a first-line FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5FU], folinic acid, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) induction chemotherapy (CT) followed by de-escalation as a maintenance strategy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective study was conducted from January 2011 to December 2018. FOLFIRINOX de-escalation was defined as stopping oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan after at least four cycles of FOLFIRINOX, without evidence of disease progression. Maintenance schedules were fluoropyrimidine monotherapy (intravenous or oral [capecitabine]), FOLFOX (5FU, oxaliplatin), or FOLFIRI (5FU, irinotecan). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were first progression-free survival (PFS1), second progression-free survival (PFS2), and toxicity. Results Among 321 patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, 147 (45.8%) were included. Median OS was 16.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.7–20.3) and median PFS1 was 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.5–10.4). The preferred maintenance regimen was FOLFIRI in 66 (45%) patients versus 5FU monotherapy in 52 (35%) and FOLFOX in 25 (17%) patients. Among 118 patients who received maintenance CT with FOLFIRI or 5FU, there was no difference in PFS1 (median, 9.0 vs. 10.1 months, respectively; p = .33) or OS (median, 16.6 vs. 18.7 months; p = .86) between the two maintenance regimens. Reintroduction of FOLFIRINOX was performed in 20.2% of patients, with a median PFS2 of 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.0–22.3). The rates of grade 3–4 toxicity were significantly higher with FOLFIRI maintenance CT than with 5FU (41% vs. 22%; p = .03), especially for neuropathy (73% vs. 9%). Conclusion 5FU monotherapy maintenance appeared to be as effective as FOLFIRI, in a FOLFIRINOX de-escalation strategy, which is largely used in France. Implications for Practice FOLFIRINOX de-escalation and maintenance is a feasible strategy in advanced pancreatic cancer that decreases chemotherapy toxicity to improve both survival and quality of life. Survivals in patients with maintenance therapy are clinically meaningful. Fluoropyrimidine monotherapy maintenance seems to be as efficient as FOLFIRI and should be a reference arm in future pancreatic cancer maintenance trials.

Background Key biomarkers under investigation for the ability to predict response to monotherapy PD-1 inhibitors such as pembrolizumab include PD-L1, TMB, MSI, and T-cell–inflamed gene expression profile (GEP). The KEYNOTE-180 trial (NCT02559687) was a single-arm phase 2 study of pembrolizumab as third-line or greater therapy in advanced/metastatic esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). ORR was 9.9% and median DOR was NR at the primary analysis. We investigated the relationship in KEYNOTE-180 between response to pembrolizumab and T-cell–inflamed GEP or PD-L1 expression by histology. Methods Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for ≤2 years until disease progression, toxicity, or withdrawal. The end points for this analysis were ORR, DOR, and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by central review and OS in the SCC and adenocarcinoma populations by GEP (non-low [≥–1.540] or low [ Results Of 121 total patients, 118 had an evaluable GEP score and 121 had an evaluable PD-L1 CPS. Fifty-one patients (42.1%) had GEPnon-lowtumors, 58 (48.0%) had CPS ≥10 tumors, and 31 (25.6%) had GEPnon-low/CPS ≥10 tumors; 63 patients (52.1%) had SCC and 58 (47.9%) had adenocarcinoma. ORR was 15.4% with GEPnon-low and 13.5% with GEPlow among patients with SCC and 12% and 0% among patients with adenocarcinoma, respectively (table 1). ORR was 20% with CPS ≥10 and 7.1% with CPS Conclusions In KEYNOTE-180, data in a small number of patients suggested that measures of inflammation, like PD-L1 and GEP, may enrich for responses to pembrolizumab. In SCC, some trends toward enrichment were observed for both biomarkers, although the trend was stronger for PD-L1 CPS ≥10. In adenocarcinoma, a trend was observed for GEP but not for PD-L1; the small number of responders is limiting, and further studies are needed to understand molecular correlates in adenocarcinoma. Acknowledgements Medical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Tim Peoples, MA, ELS, and Holly C. Cappelli, PhD, CMPP, of the ApotheCom pembrolizumab team (Yardley, PA, USA). This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials. gov, NCT02559687 Ethics Approval The study and the protocol were approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each site. Consent All patients provided written informed consent to participate in the clinical trial.

International audience; PURPOSE: This Phase IIb (NCT02195180) open-label study evaluated erythrocyte-encapsulated asparaginase (eryaspase) in combination with chemotherapy in second-line advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to either eryaspase in combination with gemcitabine or mFOLFOX6 (eryaspase arm), or to gemcitabine or mFOLFOX6 alone (control arm). Co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with low asparagine synthetase (ASNS) expression. Secondary endpoints included OS and PFS in the entire population.RESULTS: 141 patients were randomized (eryaspase arm, n = 95; control arm, n = 46). Median OS and PFS in patients with low ASNS expression were 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.1-8.8) in the eryaspase arm versus 4.9 months (3.1-7.1) in the control arm (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.39-1.01; P = 0.056) and 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.4) in the eryaspase arm versus 1.8 months (1.4-3.8) in the control arm (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40-1.12; P = 0.127), respectively. In the entire population, median OS and PFS for the eryaspase arm versus control were 6.0 months versus 4.4 months (HR, 0.60; P = 0.008) and 2.0 months versus 1.6 months (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.84; P = 0.005), respectively. The combination of eryaspase and chemotherapy was well tolerated. The most frequent Grade 3/4 adverse events in the eryaspase arm (n = 93) were gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (16 [17.2%]), neutropenia (12 [12.9%]), and physical health deterioration (12 [12.9%]).CONCLUSION: Eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy is associated with improvements in OS and PFS, irrespective of ASNS expression in second-line advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A Phase III trial is underway.

TPS7 Background: Even though the recurrence rate remains high, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone is the standard treatment in locally advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma (SCAC), in the absence of effective neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment. Modified docetaxel, cisplatin and 5FU (mDCF) is one of the standard regimens in metastatic SCAC, and induced a radiological complete response (cCR) in 45% of patients, with a biological CR (the conversion from positive to negative HPV ctDNA by liquid biopsy) in 61% of patients. Among chemotherapy-naïve patients, the cCR was as high as 55%, with 90% of ORR and 100% of disease control rate during the first 4 months. Moreover, mDCF was associated with a decrease in Myeloid-Derived Suppressive Cells (MDSC) and an increase in the antitumor anti-hTERT immunity, two major factors correlated with prognosis in advanced SCAC, rendering mDCF a good partner to combine with immunotherapy. Anti-PD1 immunotherapy is effective in chemorefractory SCAC. In sensitive tumors, neoadjuvant anti-PD1, with or without chemotherapy, induced a high rate (30-45%) of complete or near-complete pathological response. The combination of mDCF and immunotherapy is safe. Methods: INTERACTION is an open-label, pivotal, single arm, phase II study in neoadjuvant setting for stage 3 SCAC patients (NCT04719988). Fifty-five patients will receive up to 6 cycles of mDCF (docetaxel 40 mg/m2 and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on day 1, 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h) every 2 weeks, in association with ezabenlimab (anti-PD1 mAb) at 240 mg every 3 weeks. CT-scan, MRI, tumor and liquid biopsies will be performed before treatment, and after 4 cycles. CRT will be start after cycle 6. Then, ezabenlimab will be administered in the adjuvant setting up to 10 months from cycle 1. Eligible candidates include patients with treatment-naïve histologically proven locally advanced SCAC, an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and age ≥18 years. The primary endpoint is the clinical complete response rate at 10 months from the first cycle of mDCF plus ezabenlimab. Main secondary endpoints are the major pathological response (complete/near-complete response) and biological CR (HPV ctDNA negative) after induction treatment. Other secondary endpoints include the ORR, OS, PFS, RFS, HRQoL and safety. An extensive ancillary study will be performed to predict response or resistance to treatment. Peiffert D et al. JCO 2012;30:1941–8; James RD et al. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:516–24; Kim S et al. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:1094–106; Kim S et al. TAMO 2020;12:1758835920975356; Spehner L et al. IJMS 2020;21:6838; Ott PA et al. Ann Oncol 2017;28:1036–41; Morris VK et al. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:446–53; Huang AC et al. Nat Med 2019;25:454–61; Necchi A et al. JCO 2018;36:3353–60; Forde PM et al. NEJM 2018;378:1976–86; Kim S et al. BMC Cancer 2020;20:352. Clinical trial information: EudraCT 2020-006046-40 and Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04719988.

Resume Les tumeurs neuroendocrines du sein sont des tumeurs rares, peu connues et dont l’existence meme est parfois remise en cause. Les donnees de la litterature sont issues de series retrospectives, heterogenes et de faibles effectifs. Leur incidence est estimee entre 2 et 5 % des cancers du sein par l’Organisation mondiale de la sante (OMS). Elles sont definies par une architecture neuroendocrine et l’expression par les cellules tumorales des marqueurs neuroendocrines chromogranine A et/ou synaptophysine. La classification OMS revisee en 2012 distingue trois sous-types : (i) les tumeurs neuroendocrines bien differenciees ou carcinoid-like, (ii) les tumeurs neuroendocrines peu differenciees ou carcinomes a petites cellules, et (iii) les carcinomes invasifs du sein presentant une differentiation neuroendocrine. Leur presentation clinique et radiologique n’est pas specifique. Les donnees de la litterature etant discordantes, leur impact pronostique est encore debattu. La prise en charge therapeutique n’est pas codifiee et se superpose habituellement a celle des cancers du sein classiques. La place des traitements plus specifiques de type neuroendocrine comme les associations sels de platine – etoposide, les analogues de la somatostatine, la radiotherapie metabolique ou le temozolomide reste a definir. Des cas de reponse ont ete observes. Une meilleure connaissance des voies impliquees dans la carcinogenese de ces tumeurs pourrait egalement permettre de decouvrir des cibles therapeutiques potentielles. L’efficacite de therapies ciblees dans cette indication est a evaluer.

Background We studied the relationship between intermediate criteria and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who received first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab. Patients and Methods We assessed OS, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of disease control (DDC), the sum of the periods in which the disease did not progress, and the time to failure of strategy (TFS), which was defined as the entire period before the introduction of a second-line treatment. Linear correlation and regression models were used, and Prentice criteria were investigated. Results With a median follow-up of 57.6 months for 216 patients, the median OS was 24.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.3-29.7). The median PFS, DDC, and TFS were 8.9 (95% CI, 8.4-9.7), 11.0 (95% CI, 9.8-12.4), and 11.1 (95% CI, 10.0-13.0) months, respectively. The correlations between OS and DDC (Pearson coefficient, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.73-0.83], determination coefficient, 0.62) and OS and TFS (Pearson coefficient, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.73-0.84], determination coefficient, 0.63) were satisfactory. Linear regression analysis showed a significant association between OS and DDC, and between OS and TFS. Prentice criteria were verified for TFS as well as DDC. Conclusion DDC and TFS correlated with OS and are relevant as intermediate criteria in the setting of patients with mCRC treated with a first-line bevacizumab-based regimen.

Background The squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare disease, but its incidence is markedly increasing. About 15% of patients are diagnosed at metastatic stage, and more than 20% with a localized disease treated by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) will recur. In advanced SCCA, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) combination is the standard option but complete response is a rare event and the prognosis remains poor with most disease progression occurring within the first 12 months. We have previously published the potential role of the addition of docetaxel (D). Among 8 consecutive patients with advanced recurrent SCCA after CRT, the DCF regimen induced a complete response in 4 patients, including 3 pathological complete responses. Then, the Epitopes-HPV02 study was designed to confirm the interest of DCF regimen in SCCA patients. Methods This multicentre phase II trial assesses the DCF regimen in advanced SCCA patients. Main eligibility criteria are: histologically proven SCCA, unresectable locally advanced recurrent or metastatic disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status (ECOG-PS) vs. ≤ 75 years-old) and ECOG-PS (0 vs. 1). The trial was set up based on a Simon’s optimal two-stage design for phase II trials, allowing an early futility interim analysis. The primary endpoint is the observed progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 months from the first DCF cycle. A PFS rate below 10% is considered uninteresting, while a PFS rate above 25% is expected. With a unilateral alpha error of 5% and a statistical power of 90%, 66 evaluable patients should be included. Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS, response rate, safety, health-related quality of life, and the correlation of biomarkers with treatment efficacy. Discussion Since the recommended CF regimen is based in a small retrospective analysis and generates a low rate of complete responses, the Epitopes-HPV02 study will establish a new standard in case of a positive result. Associated biomarker studies will contribute to understand the underlying mechanism of resistance and the role of immunity in SCCA. Trial registration NCT02402842 , EudraCT: 2014–001789-81.

LBA4001 Background: NIVO demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) vs chemo in previously treated patients (pts) with ESCC (ATTRACTION-3). We report OS and progression-free survival (PFS) from CheckMate 648, the first global phase III study to evaluate both an immuno-oncology (I-O)/chemo combination and an I-O/I-O combination in advanced ESCC. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic ESCC were enrolled regardless of tumor cell PD-L1 expression. Pts were randomized to NIVO (240 mg Q2W) + chemo (fluorouracil + cisplatin Q4W), NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), or chemo alone. Primary endpoints for both comparisons were OS and PFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%. Hierarchically tested secondary endpoints included OS and PFS in all randomized pts. Results: 970 pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo, NIVO + IPI, and chemo arms (49% with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%). With 13 months (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI led to statistically significant improvement in OS vs chemo in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% and all randomized pts (Table). Statistically significant PFS benefit was also observed for NIVO + chemo vs chemo (HR 0.65 [98.5% CI 0.46–0.92]; P = 0.0023) in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%. PFS in NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% did not meet the prespecified boundary for significance. The objective response rate (per BICR) was 53% (NIVO + chemo), 35% (NIVO + IPI), and 20% (chemo) in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% and in all randomized pts was 47%, 28%, and 27%, respectively; longer median (95% CI) duration of response was observed vs chemo for pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%: 8.4 (6.9–12.4), 11.8 (7.1–27.4), and 5.7 (4.4–8.7) mo and for all randomized pts: 8.2 (6.9–9.7), 11.1 (8.3–14.0), and 7.1 (5.7–8.2) mo, respectively. No new safety signals were identified (Table). Conclusions: NIVO plus chemo and NIVO plus IPI both demonstrated superior OS vs chemo, along with durable objective responses and acceptable safety, in pts with advanced ESCC, and each represents a potential new 1L treatment option. Clinical trial information: NCT03143153. [Table: see text]

Objective: This study aimed to identify predictors of tumor control (TC) in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods: A development cohort of 68 patients from a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01248299) was used to identify predictors of TC at first radiological tumor assessment and to generate a predictive score for TC. That score was applied in an independent retrospective single-center validation cohort of 60 consecutive patients. Results: Multivariate analysis identified three predictors of TC: body mass index ≥18.5 (OR 4.5, 95% CI 0.91-22.5), absence of bone metastasis (OR 4.6, 95% CI 0.91-23.2) and albumin ≥35 g/l (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.0-12.1). Based on the presence or absence of these three independent prognosticators, we built a predictive model using a score from 0 to 3. In the development cohort, the TC rates were 14.3 and 78.0% and in the validation cohort 12.5 and 44.2%, for scores of 0-1 and 2-3, respectively. With negative predictive values of 85 and 88% in the development and validation cohorts, respectively, we were able to identify patients with a very low probability of TC. Conclusion: We have developed and validated a score that can be easily determined at the bedside to predict TC in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

4639 Background: FOLFIRINOX (5FU, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) is a reference first line (L1) of chemotherapy (CT) in fit patients (Pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer (aPC). Limiting toxicities (in particular, neuropathy) are frequent and maintaining quality of life without a lack of efficacy is a crucial need. Modalities and efficacy of maintenance strategy in aPC remain scarcely studied. Our study describes the French practices of a FOLFIRINOX de-escalation and maintenance in a real-life multicentric cohort. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicentric study in 5 French centers. Pts receiving FOLFIRINOX L1 for aPC were recruited between January 2011 and December 2018. FOLFIRINOX de-escalation was defined as stopping oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan in patients without tumor progression, after at least 4 cycles of FOLFIRINOX. Maintenance schedules were oral capecitabine or intravenous (IV) 5FU, FOLFOX or FOLFIRI. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were first progression-free survival (PFS1) and, in case of reintroduction of FOLFIRINOX, second progression free survival (PFS2). OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Among the 321 patients included, 147 (46%) received a maintenance therapy. Median age was 60.0 (53-66), 35 (24%) had locally advanced PC and 91 (62%) had metastatic PC. The median number of cycles of FOLFIRINOX was 9.0 (6.0-11.0). Median OS was 16.1 months (95%CI=13.7-20.3). Median PFS1 was 9.4 months (95%CI=8.5-10.4). The preferred maintenance regimen was FOLFIRI in 66 (45%), vs fluoropyrimidine (FP) in 52 (35%) and FOLFOX in 25 (17%). Among 118 Pts who received a maintenance CT with FP or FOLFIRI, there was no difference in PFS1 (median: 10.1 vs 9.0, respectively, p=0.33) or OS (median: 16.6 versus 18.7, p=0.86) between the 2 maintenance regimens. After progression under maintenance CT with FOLFIRI or FP, reintroduction of FOLFIRINOX was performed in 20.2% of Pts, with a median PFS2 of 2.8 months (95%CI=2.0-22.3). The rates of G3-4 toxicity were significantly higher during FOLFIRI maintenance CT than with FP (41% vs 22%, p=0.03), especially neuropathy (73% vs 9%). Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX de-escalation in aPC is largely used in France. Fluoropyrimidine maintenance chemotherapy appears to be as effective as FOLFIRI.

Aims: The addition of docetaxel to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has shown promising efficacy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). Preliminary results of Epitopes-HPV01 study showed a high rate of long-lasting complete response to DCF. The prospective, multicenter, Epitopes-HPV02 trial then confirmed the high efficacy of the modified DCF (mDCF) regimen in terms of complete response rate and long-term survival in metastatic or non-resectable locally advanced recurrent SCCA. Here, we present updated results of the Epitopes-HPV01 and Epitopes-HPV02 studies. Patients & methods: Epitopes-HPV01 is a prospective study performed by the regional cancer network of Franche-Comté, France. Epitopes-HPV02 is a phase II study supported by two French collaborative oncological groups, performed in 25 centers. Both studies included patients with metastatic, or with unresectable local recurrent SCCA, treated with DCF regimen. Results: In Epitopes-HPV01, 51 patients were enrolled between September 2012 and January 2019, and 49 patients were included for analysis; while 69 patients were included between September 2014 and December 2016 in Epitopes-HPV02, and 66 patients for analysis. Pooled analysis of 115 patients showed a median progression-free survival of 12.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.6–16.1] [11.0 months (9.3–16.0) in -HPV02, and 15.6 months (11.2–34.5) in -HPV01, ( p = 0.06)]. The median overall survival was 39.2 months (26.0–109.1) [36.3 in -HPV02 (25.2–NR), and 61.1 months (21.4–120.0) in -HPV01 ( p = 0.62)]. Objective response rate was 87.7% (90.9% in -HPV02 and 83.3% in -HPV01) with 40.3% of complete response (45.5% in -HPV02 and 33.3% in -HPV01). No differences were observed between standard DCF ( n = 54) and mDCF ( n = 58) in terms of OS ( p = 0.57) and PFS ( p = 0.99). 5-years PFS and OS rates were 24.5% and 44.4%, respectively, in the whole population. No treatment-related death was observed. Conclusion: Updated results of Epitopes-HPV01 and 02 studies, as well as the pooled analysis, confirm mDCF as a standard treatment in patients with advanced SCCA.

Importance Effective treatment options are limited for patients with advanced, metastatic esophageal cancer progressing after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for patients with advanced, metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or advanced, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction that progressed after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This phase 2, open-label, interventional, single-arm study, KEYNOTE-180, enrolled 121 patients from January 12, 2016, to March 21, 2017, from 57 sites in 10 countries. Patients had advanced, metastatic esophageal cancer that progressed after 2 or more lines of therapy and had evaluable tumor samples for biomarkers. Interventions Pembrolizumab, 200 mg, was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or study withdrawal, for up to 2 years. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary end point was objective response rate per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors by central imaging review for all patients. Results As of September 18, 2017, of 121 enrolled patients (100 men and 21 women; median age, 65 years [range, 33-87 years]), 18 (14.9%) had undergone 3 or more prior therapies, 63 (52.1%) had ESCC, and 58 (47.9%) had tumors positive for programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), defined as a combined positive score of 10 or higher assessed by immunohistochemistry. Median duration of follow-up was 5.8 months (range, 0.2-18.3 months). Objective response rate was 9.9% (95% CI, 5.2%-16.7%) among all patients (12 of 121), and median duration of response was not reached (range, 1.9-14.4 months). Objective response rate was 14.3% (95% CI, 6.7%-25.4%) among patients with ESCC (9 of 63), 5.2% (95% CI, 1.1%-14.4%) among patients with adenocarcinoma (3 of 58), 13.8% (95% CI, 6.1%-25.4%) among patients with PD-L1–positive tumors (8 of 58), and 6.3% (95% CI, 1.8%-15.5%) among patients with PD-L1–negative tumors (4 of 63). Overall, 15 patients (12.4%) had treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events. Only 5 patients (4.1%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. There was 1 treatment-related death from pneumonitis. Conclusions and Relevance Where effective treatment options are an unmet need, pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity with manageable safety in patients with heavily pretreated esophageal cancer. Phase 3 studies evaluating pembrolizumab vs standard therapy for patients with esophageal cancer progressing after first-line therapy or in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer are ongoing. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02559687

Summary Background The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma has been increasing markedly in the past few decades. Currently, there is no validated treatment for advanced-stage anal squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, we aimed to validate the clinical activity and safety of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods We did a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. We recruited patients from 25 academic hospitals, cancer research centres, and community hospitals in France who were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed anal squamous cell carcinoma, with metastatic disease or with unresectable local recurrence; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1; and with at least one evaluable lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Chemotherapy-naive patients received either six cycles of standard DCF (75 mg/m 2 docetaxel and 75 mg/m 2 cisplatin on day 1 and 750 mg/m 2 per day of fluorouracil for 5 days, every 3 weeks) or eight cycles of modified DCF (40 mg/m 2 docetaxel and 40 mg/m 2 cisplatin on day 1 and 1200 mg/m 2 per day of fluorouracil for 2 days, every 2 weeks), which were administered intravenously. The choice between the standard versus modified regimens was recommended based on, but not limited to, age (≤75 years vs >75 years) and ECOG performance status (0 vs 1). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival at 12 months from the first DCF cycle; for the primary endpoint to be met, at least 11 (17%) of 66 enrolled patients had to be alive without disease progression at 12 months. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in a modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all patients who were evaluable for progression at 12 months who received at least one cycle of DCF. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02402842, and the final results are presented here. Findings Between Sept 17, 2014, and Dec 7, 2016, we enrolled 69 patients. Of these patients, three did not receive DCF. Of the 66 patients who received treatment, 36 received the standard DCF regimen and 30 received modified DCF. The primary endpoint was met: 31 (47%) of 66 patients were alive and progression free at 12 months. 22 (61%) of 36 patients who received the standard DCF regimen and 18 (60%) of 30 patients who received the modified DCF regimen had disease progression at data cutoff. 46 (70%) of 66 patients had at least one grade 3–4 adverse event (30 [83%] of 36 in the standard DCF regimen and 16 [53%] of 30 in the modified DCF regimen). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (15 [23%]; eight [22%] for standard DCF vs seven [23%] for modified DCF), diarrhoea (12 [18%]; nine [25%] vs three [10%]), asthenia (ten [15%]; eight [22%] vs two [7%]), anaemia (ten [15%]; six [17%] vs four [13%]), lymphopenia (eight [12%]; three [8%] vs five [17%]), mucositis (seven [11%]; seven [19%] vs none), and vomiting (seven [11%]; five [14%] vs two [7%]). No grade 4 non-haematological adverse events and febrile neutropenia were observed with modified DCF, whereas three (8%) grade 4 non-haematological adverse events and five (14%) cases of febrile neutropenia were reported with standard DCF. 97 serious adverse events were reported (69 in patients who received the standard DCF regimen [61 drug-related] and 28 in those given the modified DCF regimen [14 drug-related]). No treatment-related deaths were recorded. Interpretation Compared with standard DCF, modified DCF provided long-lasting response with good tolerability in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma with ECOG performance status of 0–1 in the first-line setting, and therefore could be considered as a new standard of care for these patients. Regarding the elevated risk of high-grade and serious adverse events and febrile neutropenia, standard DCF cannot be recommended in this situation. Funding Besancon University Hospital and Ligue contre le cancer Grand-Est.

To the Editor,Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor, commonly used to improve survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients [1]. Wound h...

Primary neuroendocrine breast carcinomas are rare and little-known tumors. Only a limited number of studies on neuroendocrine breast carcinomas have been reported in the literature, and the vast majority of them are small retrospective series or case reports. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), they account for only 2 % to 5 % of breast cancers. Their diagnosis relies on the presence of a neuroendocrine architecture and the expression of neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin A and/or synaptophysin). The revised 2012 WHO classification subdivides them into three categories: (i) well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, (ii) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas or small-cell carcinomas, and (iii) invasive breast carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation. Their clinical features and radiological characteristics are not different from those of other types of breast cancer. Because of discordant results, their clinical outcome is still poorly defined. So far, no standard treatment has been established, and most clinicians draw on their experience of invasive ductal cancer. The role of specific treatments like platinum-based chemotherapy, somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionucleide therapy or temozolomide remains unclear. A better knowledge of the molecular pathways involved in their carcinogenesis could help to identify new potential therapeutic targets. The efficacy of targeted therapies has to be studied.

Background Often curative treatment for locally advanced resectable esophageal or gastro-esophageal junctional cancer consists of concurrent neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by surgery. Currently, one of the most commonly used chemotherapy regimens in this setting is a combination of a fluoropyrimidin and of a platinum analogue. Due to the promising results of the recent CROSS trial, another regimen combining paclitaxel and carboplatin is also widely used by European and American centers. No clinical study has shown the superiority of one treatment over the other. The objective of this Phase II study is to clarify clinical practice by comparing these two chemotherapy treatments. Our aim is to evaluate, in operable esophageal and gastro-esophageal junctional cancer, the complete resection rate and severe postoperative morbidity rate associated with these two neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens (carboplatin-paclitaxel or fluorouracil-oxaliplatin-folinic acid) when each is combined with the radiation regime utilized in the CROSS trial. Methods/design PROTECT is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open arms, phase II trial. Eligible patients will have a histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma and be treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery for stage IIB or stage III resectable esophageal cancer. A total of 106 patients will be randomized to receive either 3 cycles of FOLFOX combined to concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Grays) or carboplatin and paclitaxel with the same radiation regimen, using a 1:1 allocation ratio. Discussion This ongoing trial offers the unique opportunity to compare two standards of chemotherapy delivered with a common regimen of preoperative radiation, in the setting of operable locally advanced esophageal or gastro-esophageal junctional tumors. Trial registration NCT02359968 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (registration date: 9 FEB 2015), EudraCT: 2014-000649-62 (registration date: 10 FEB 2014)

Background & Aims: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) failure when using transient elastography occurs in 2–10% of patients, and is generally related to obesity. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility of LSM when using a new XL probe on patients with a body mass index (BMI)≥30 kg/m2. Methods: For each patient, LSM was performed using both M probe (currently available and dedicated to patients with standard morphology) and XL probe (dedicated to overweighed patients). A blood sample was taken to assess usual biological variables and simple readily available fibrosis blood tests. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included (27 men, mean age 52 years, mean BMI 40.5 kg/m2). LSM was successful (10 valid measurements) in 45% of the cases with the M probe, vs 76% of the cases with the XL probe (P

Malignant ascites, occurring in advanced stages of cancer, is linked with poor prognosis and can cause invalidating symptoms. Physiopathological mechanisms of ascites formation are complex and have yet to be fully elucidated. In most cases, ascites is due to peritoneal carcinomatosis in which vascular permeability is enhanced by VEGF production while lymphatic drainage decreases. Ascites can also be secondary to portal hypertension, for example in case of multiple liver metastases, or due to lymphatic obstruction. While paracentesis and diuretics are commonly used, their efficiency has never been compared in a randomized controlled study. Paracentesis brings immediate but temporary relief in over 90% of cases, and implies multiple hospitalizations. Literature reports ascites control by aldosterone alone or in association with furosemide. But, available data is controversial, and there is no predictive factor to identify patients that respond to diuretic treatment. The indication of diuretic treatment is left to the appreciation of physicians. Existing recommendations are old, and practices influenced by results obtained in non-neoplastic ascites. Additional evidences are required before guidelines can be established for the palliative management of malignant ascites.

e14015 Background: OMC, as continuous administration of low doses of chemotherapy acts as direct cytotoxic as well as antiangiogenetic agent. wP also induces antiangiogenic effects in mouse models. The aims of this trial were to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of wP given in combination with OMC, and estimate activity and safety of the combination. Methods: Methods This is a single-center, phase 1 trial. Patients (pts) > 18 years with refractory metastatic cancers were eligible if no standard curative measures existed. Paclitaxel was administered IV weekly (D1, D8, D15; D1 = D28) in combination with a fixed dose of OMC (50mg x2/day). A 3+3 design was used for Dose-Escalation of wP (40 mg/m² to 75 mg/m²), followed by an expansion cohort at RP2D. The primary endpoint was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as grade > 3 non-hematological or grade 4 hematological toxicity (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) occurring in the first 28 days, or any toxicity leading to a dose reduction. Results: 28 pts (18 in dose-escalation phase and 10 in expansion cohort) were included between May 2011 and December 2013. The sex ratio was 2:1, the median age was 54.5 (range, 26-67); the most common primary tumors were colorectal cancers (n = 9), sarcomas (n = 4), Head & Neck (n = 3). 16/18 pts enrolled in the dose-escalation phase were evaluable for DLT. DLT occurred in 0/3, 1/6 (neuropathy), 0/3 and 2/4 pts (hematological toxicity) at dose 40, 60, 70 and 75 mg/m² of wP, respectively. The RP2D of wP was 70 mg/m2; 1/10 pts in the expansion phase had an hematological DLT. At RP2D (n = 14), the maximal grade of adverse events (AE), regardless of causality, was Gr2 in 3 pts, Gr3 in 7 pts, Gr4 in 3 pts and Gr5 in 1 pt; the maximal grade of treatment-related AE was Gr1 in 1 pt, Gr2 in 8 pts, Gr3 in 3 pts and Gr4 in 1 pt (no AE in 1 pt). At RP2D, the median PFS was 2.8 mo and Growth Modulation index was ≥1.33 in 4/14 pts (29%). There was 1 objective response (1/14; 7%): 1 pt with lung adenocarcinoma achieved a partial response. Conclusions: The combination of OMC and wP resulted in an acceptable safety profile. Further evaluation of this combination with wP at 70mg/m² could be warranted in a phase 2 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT01374620.

737 Background: A is approved in combination with FOLFIRI (A-FOLFIRI) for the treatment of mCRC patients (pts) previously treated with oxaliplatin. PULSAR trial (NCT02173990) aims to measure the activity A-FOLFIRI as 1st-line mCRC treatment. Key secondary objectives are safety, as well as circulating biomarkers and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements as PFS prognosticators. We present here interim analysis of safety and activity. Methods: Pts received A (4 mg/kg I.V.) every 2 weeks in combination with FOLFIRI (Irinotecan: 180 mg/m2, leucovorin: 200 mg/m2, Bolus FU: 400 mg/m2, infusional FU: 2400 mg/m2 over 46hrs). The primary endpoint is 10-month [m] PFS (RECIST 1.1). The target sample size is 72 pts for the following assumptions: P0 = 0.40, P1 = 0.55, α = β = 0.1. Results: Among the first 30 recruited mCRC pts with unresectable metastases (mets), 29 received at least 1 cycle of A-FOLFIRI. 30, 23, and 28 pts were evaluable for survival (intent-to-treat), tumor response, and safety, respectively. Median age was 61.5 (45-82), 70% pts were men. ECOG PS was 0, 1, and 2, in 47%, 43%, and 10% of the pts. 6/30 pts received previous adjuvant chemotherapy. 22/30 pts presented with synchronous mets. 26/30 pts presented with liver mets. Median treatment duration was 6.3m (0.5-24.3) and pts (n = 29) received a median number of 10 cycles (1-37) of A and of 11 cycles (1-43) of FOLFIRI. Median follow-up was 7.2m (1.6-23.9). The 10-m PFS was 59.9% [95%-CI: 37.5-76.5]. Median PFS was 12.9m (95% CI: 6.1-…). 12-m OS rate was 73.7% (95% CI: 48.3-87.9). 5 pts died from PD, and 1 from treatment-related toxicity (colon perforation). 27/28 pts presented at least one severe Adverse Event (AE). Most frequent severe AE (related or not) were hypertension (43%), neutropenia (29%), diarrhea (18%), alkaline phosphatase increase (18%), fatigue (18%), GGT increase (14%), and weight loss (14%). Conclusions: A-FOLFIRI seems promising in 1st line setting mCRC, with respect to PFS. Due to high rates of severe AEs, dose modifications have to be proceeded in a coming protocol amendment. Funded by Sanofi. Clinical trial information: NCT02173990.