Search

Purpose: Temozolomide plus PARP inhibition has shown promise in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We previously reported outcomes from the first 50 patients (cohort 1) of a phase I/II trial of olaparib/temozolomide in recurrent SCLC. Here, we report a final analysis of this trial, including a second cohort with an alternate dosing strategy and an exploratory analysis of CNS-specific outcomes., Methods: This was an open-label phase I/II trial testing the combination of olaparib and temozolomide in relapsed SCLC. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints were safety, PFS, and OS. We tested escalating doses of olaparib/temozolomide across two cohorts, both of which had temozolomide dosed on D1-7 of each 21-days cycle. In previously published cohort 1, olaparib was dosed on D1-7; in cohort 2 olaparib was dosed continuously., Results: Sixty-six patients were enrolled across the two cohorts, 50 in cohort 1 and 16 in cohort 2. The confirmed ORR of cohort 1 was 41.7% (20/48 evaluable), and the confirmed ORR of cohort 2 was 7% (1/14 evaluable; closed after dose escalation to enrollment for lack of observed efficacy). Among 15/66 patients (22.7%) with untreated brain metastases at enrollment, best overall intracranial response was CR in 6/15 patients, PR in 4/15 patients, and SD in 3/15 patients for a CNS disease control rate of 87% (95% CI: 59.5-98.3%)., Conclusions: Olaparib/temozolomide may be effective in relapsed SCLC, especially for patients with CNS disease. Ongoing analyses regarding optimal dosing schedule will inform potential for future use of this combination in SCLC.

Molecularly targeted agents are increasingly being studied in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to try and improve cure. However, phase 3 data on neoadjuvant therapy have largely been conducted in a biomarker agnostic manner with inconsistent exclusion of EGFR and ALK alterations. Our objective was to develop IND.242 as a large-scale neoadjuvant platform trial to introduce novel agents into the preoperative window for molecularly-defined NSCLC patient populations. Given that KRAS G12C mutations are common in the overall NSCLC patient population, ranging from 9.4% to 13% of cases across different cohorts, and may be associated to worse prognosis, the initial IND.242A Substudy was designed to test neoadjuvant JDQ443 (opnurasib), a selective KRAS G12C inhibitor. This current trial report describes the multicenter, Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG)-led IND.242 neoadjuvant phase 2 platform master protocol and its first Substudy (IND.242A) of neoadjuvant opnurasib KRAS G12C inhibitor for patients with surgically resectable NSCLC (AJCC 8th edition stage IA2 to IIIA). In IND.242A, a maximum of 27 patients will be accrued in participating Canadian sites. The primary objective is the rate of major pathological response (MPR) following neoadjuvant opnurasib. Secondary objectives include safety and tolerability of the treatment regimen, objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 for the neoadjuvant treatment period, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years, and surgical outcomes. Exploratory objectives are to explore patient related outcomes (PROs) and identify potential predictive biomarkers of response and mechanisms of resistance on tissue and peripheral blood samples., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: JS; received speaker fees, honoraria or consulting fees from Merck, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Xenetic Biosciences, Regeneron, Eisai, Peerview, OncLive, and Medscape; and received research grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Roche, CLS Therapeutics and Protalix Biotherapeutics. SO; participated in advisory boards for Roche, Novocure, Takeda, Novartis and Bristol Myers Quibb; and has received honoraria from AstraZeneca. QC; participated in advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, AnHeart, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daichii Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; has received research funding from AstraZeneca; and has participated on data and safety monitoring boards for Merck. CL; participated on advisory boards or had a speaker's agreement with AbbVie, Alethia Therapeutics Inc., Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Jounce Therapeutics, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Trizell Ltd, United Therapeutics and Xcovery. BS; participated on advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Takeda, Janssen and Pfizer; and had a speaker's agreement with AstraZeneca. JK; employee and stockholder of Novartis. AFF; employee and stockholder of Novartis. MST; received research funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Sanofi; and received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Daichii-Sankyo. BK; participated on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Merck, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Medtronic. RJ; participated on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Sorono, Fusion Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; has received research funding from Alkermes, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bold Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fusion Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Macrogenics, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, and Novartis; acted as a consultant for Bristal Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dhome, and Pfizer; and received honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. PAB; received honoraria from Merck, Abbvie, Lilly, and Pfizer; participated on advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Mirati, AstraZeneca and RAPT Therapeutics; and participated on data and safety monitoring boards for Mirati., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) presents as a highly chemosensitive malignancy but acquires cross-resistance after relapse. This transformation is nearly inevitable in patients but has been difficult to capture in laboratory models. Here, we present a preclinical system that recapitulates acquired cross-resistance, developed from 51 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Each model was tested in vivo against three clinical regimens: cisplatin plus etoposide, olaparib plus temozolomide, and topotecan. These drug-response profiles captured hallmark clinical features of SCLC, such as the emergence of treatment-refractory disease after early relapse. For one patient, serial PDX models revealed that cross-resistance was acquired through MYC amplification on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA). Genomic and transcriptional profiles of the full PDX panel revealed that MYC paralog amplifications on ecDNAs were recurrent in relapsed cross-resistant SCLC, and this was corroborated in tumor biopsies from relapsed patients. We conclude that ecDNAs with MYC paralogs are recurrent drivers of cross-resistance in SCLC., Significance: SCLC is initially chemosensitive, but acquired cross-resistance renders this disease refractory to further treatment and ultimately fatal. The genomic drivers of this transformation are unknown. We use a population of PDX models to discover that amplifications of MYC paralogs on ecDNA are recurrent drivers of acquired cross-resistance in SCLC. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 695., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Lurbinectedin is a synthetic marine-derived anticancer agent that acts as a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription. Lurbinectedin monotherapy (3·2 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks) received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration on the basis of efficacy in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who relapsed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The ATLANTIS trial assessed the efficacy and safety of combination lurbinectedin and the anthracycline doxorubicin as second-line treatment for SCLC., Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, randomised study, adult patients aged 18 years or older with SCLC who relapsed after platinum-based chemotherapy were recruited from 135 hospitals across North America, South America, Europe, and the Middle East. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by dynamic allocation to intravenous lurbinectedin 2·0 mg/m 2 plus doxorubicin 40·0 mg/m 2 administered on day 1 of 21-day cycles or physician's choice of control therapy (intravenous topotecan 1·5 mg/m 2 on days 1-5 of 21-day cycles; or intravenous cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m 2 , doxorubicin 45·0 mg/m 2 , and vincristine 2·0 mg on day 1 of 21-day cycles [CAV]) administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis was mandatory in both treatment groups. Neither patients nor clinicians were masked to treatment allocation, but the independent review committee, which assessed outcomes, was masked to patients' treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02566993, and with EudraCT, 2015-001641-89, and is complete., Findings: Between Aug 30, 2016, and Aug 20, 2018, 613 patients were randomly assigned to lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin (n=307) or control (topotecan, n=127; CAV, n=179) and comprised the intention-to-treat population; safety endpoints were assessed in patients who had received any partial or complete study treatment infusions (lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin, n=303; control, n=289). After a median follow-up of 24·1 months (95% CI 21·7-26·3), 303 patients in the lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin group and 289 patients in the control group had discontinued study treatment; progressive disease was the most common reason for discontinuation (213 [70%] patients in the lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin group vs 152 [53%] in the control group). Median overall survival was 8·6 months (95% CI 7·1-9·4) in the lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin group versus 7·6 months (6·6-8·2) in the control group (stratified log-rank p=0·90; hazard ratio 0·97 [95% CI 0·82-1·15], p=0·70). 12 patients died because of treatment-related adverse events: two (<1%) of 303 in the lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin group and ten (3%) of 289 in the control group. 296 (98%) of 303 patients in the lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin group had treatment-emergent adverse events compared with 284 (98%) of 289 patients in the control group; treatment-related adverse events occurred in 268 (88%) patients in the lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin group and 266 (92%) patients in the control group. Grade 3 or worse haematological adverse events were less frequent in the lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin group than the control group (anaemia, 57 [19%] of 302 patients in the lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin group vs 110 [38%] of 288 in the control group; neutropenia, 112 [37%] vs 200 [69%]; thrombocytopenia, 42 [14%] vs 90 [31%]). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation was lower in the lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin group than in the control group (26 [9%] of 303 patients in the lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin group vs 47 [16%] of 289 in the control group)., Interpretation: Combination therapy with lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin did not improve overall survival versus control in patients with relapsed SCLC. However, lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin showed a favourable haematological safety profile compared with control., Funding: PharmaMar., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SPA has received honoraria from Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb; has received support for attending meetings or travel from Roche; and has a patent for lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab. TEC reports consultant or advisory fees from Astellas Pharma, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi, Novartis, Servier, and A&D Pharma; and travel support from Pfizer, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Servier, Ipsen, Amgen, A&D Pharma, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Astellas Pharma. LB reports payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca and Roche. EFS reports consulting fees paid to his institution from Merck and Eli Lilly; payment or honoraria to his institution from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi Sankyo; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Merck, AstraZeneca, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. AC reports payment or honoraria from Genentech, Takeda, Blueprint Medicines, and Amgen; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Ipsen, Odonate Therapeutics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Aileron Therapeutics, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi; and holds stock or stock options in Merck. IH reports personal payments and payments to her institution from Syneos Health UK. AFF reports a consultancy or advisory role with AstraZeneca, Syros, OncLive, Clinical Care Oncology, Bayer, H3 Biomedicine, Pfizer, Medscape, PeerView, Genentech, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Boehringer Ingelheim; research funding to her institution from Bayer, Genentech, and AstraZeneca; was an employee and held stock or stock options in Novartis; and received support for this manuscript from PharmaMar. JAL-V, ANi, NV, JG, CK, and AZ are employees of PharmaMar and report stock or stock options in PharmaMar. MC-Y is an employee of PharmaMar. KS reports personal consulting fees from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; and consulting fees paid to his institution from Amgen. IB reports payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. CFW reports consulting fees from Viatris, Roche, and Alvotech; honoraria for lectures from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; meeting or travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb; and honoraria for advisory boards from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. OJ-V reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Takeda; payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Takeda; and meeting or travel support from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche. NR reports payment or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Hoffmann-La Roche, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Pfizer, and Takeda; and meeting or travel support from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffmann-La Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Takeda. MD reports payment or honoraria for lectures and advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Roche. LP-A reports honoraria for scientific advice and speaker fees from Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, PharmaMar, Merck, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Servier, Amgen, Pfizer, Ipsen, Sanofi, Bayer, Mirati, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Takeda; participates as external member of the board of Genómica; is a founder and board member of Altum sequencing; and has received institutional support for contracted research from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Covalent inhibitors of KRASG12C have shown antitumor activity against advanced/metastatic KRASG12C-mutated cancers, though resistance emerges and additional strategies are needed to improve outcomes. JDQ443 is a structurally unique covalent inhibitor of GDP-bound KRASG12C that forms novel interactions with the switch II pocket. JDQ443 potently inhibits KRASG12C-driven cellular signaling and demonstrates selective antiproliferative activity in KRASG12C-mutated cell lines, including those with G12C/H95 double mutations. In vivo, JDQ443 induces AUC exposure-driven antitumor efficacy in KRASG12C-mutated cell-derived (CDX) and patient-derived (PDX) tumor xenografts. In PDX models, single-agent JDQ443 activity is enhanced by combination with inhibitors of SHP2, MEK, or CDK4/6. Notably, the benefit of JDQ443 plus the SHP2 inhibitor TNO155 is maintained at reduced doses of either agent in CDX models, consistent with mechanistic synergy. JDQ443 is in clinical development as monotherapy and in combination with TNO155, with both strategies showing antitumor activity in patients with KRASG12C-mutated tumors., Significance: JDQ443 is a structurally novel covalent KRASG12C inhibitor with a unique binding mode that demonstrates potent and selective antitumor activity in cell lines and in vivo models. In preclinical models and patients with KRASG12C-mutated malignancies, JDQ443 shows potent antitumor activity as monotherapy and in combination with the SHP2 inhibitor TNO155. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1397., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

In small cell lung cancer (SCLC), acquired resistance to DNA-damaging therapy is challenging to study because rebiopsy is rarely performed. We used patient-derived xenograft models, established before therapy and after progression, to dissect acquired resistance to olaparib plus temozolomide (OT), a promising experimental therapy for relapsed SCLC. These pairs of serial models reveal alterations in both cell cycle kinetics and DNA replication and demonstrate both inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity in mechanisms of resistance. In one model pair, up-regulation of translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) enabled tolerance of OT-induced damage during DNA replication. TLS inhibitors restored sensitivity to OT both in vitro and in vivo, and similar synergistic effects were seen in additional SCLC cell lines. This represents the first described mechanism of acquired resistance to DNA damage in a patient with SCLC and highlights the potential of the serial model approach to investigate and overcome resistance to therapy in SCLC.

Delta-like protein 3 (DLL3) is highly expressed in solid tumors, including neuroendocrine carcinomas/neuroendocrine tumors (NEC/NET). Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is a DLL3-targeting antibody-drug conjugate. Patients with NECs and other advanced DLL3-expressing tumors were enrolled in this phase I/II study (NCT02709889). The primary endpoint was safety. Two hundred patients were enrolled: 101 with NEC/NET (large-cell NEC, gastroenteropancreatic NEC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer, and other NEC/NET) and 99 with other solid tumors (melanoma, medullary thyroid cancer [MTC], glioblastoma, and other). The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 0.3 mg/kg every 6 weeks (q6w) for two cycles. At the RP2D, grade 3/4 adverse events included anemia (17%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (8%). Responses were confirmed in 15/145 patients (10%) treated at 0.3 mg/kg, including 9/69 patients (13%) with NEC/NET. Rova-T at 0.3 mg/kg q6w had manageable toxicity, with antitumor activity observed in patients with NEC/NET, melanoma, MTC, and glioblastoma., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Genetic rearrangements of the tyrosine receptor kinase ROS proto-oncogene 1 ( ROS1 ) are oncogenic drivers in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results of an updated integrated analysis of three phase I or II clinical trials (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2) of the ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, entrectinib, in ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC., Methods: The efficacy-evaluable population included adults with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC with or without CNS metastases who received entrectinib ≥ 600 mg orally once per day. Co-primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review and duration of response (DoR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial ORR, intracranial DoR, intracranial PFS, and safety., Results: In total, 161 patients with a follow-up of ≥ 6 months were evaluable. The median treatment duration was 10.7 months (IQR, 6.4-17.7). The ORR was 67.1% (n = 108, 95% CI, 59.3 to 74.3), and responses were durable (12-month DoR rate, 63%, median DoR 15.7 months). The 12-month PFS rate was 55% (median PFS 15.7 months), and the 12-month OS rate was 81% (median OS not estimable). In 24 patients with measurable baseline CNS metastases by blinded independent central review, the intracranial ORR was 79.2% (n = 19; 95% CI, 57.9 to 92.9), the median intracranial PFS was 12.0 months (95% CI, 6.2 to 19.3), and the median intracranial DoR was 12.9 months (12-month rate, 55%). The safety profile in this updated analysis was similar to that reported in the primary analysis, and no new safety signals were found., Conclusion: Entrectinib continued to demonstrate a high level of clinical benefit for patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, including patients with CNS metastases., Competing Interests: Rafal DziadziuszkoHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Seattle GeneticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AstraZeneca Matthew G. KrebsHonoraria: RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Achilles Therapeutics, Janssen, Seattle Genetics, OM Pharmaceutical Industries, BayerSpeakers' Bureau: RocheResearch Funding: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, BerGenBio, Immutep Filippo De BraudHonoraria: Roche, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD, Servier, Sanofi, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Incyte, Teofarma, EMD Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Sanofi, Novartis ItalyResearch Funding: Novartis, Roche, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Servier, Philogen, Loxo, Tesaro, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Kymab Salvatore SienaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Guardant Health, Myriad GeneticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Roche/Genentech, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, CheckmAbPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Bayer, Roche Alexander DrilonHonoraria: Medscape, OncLive, PeerVoice, Physicans' Education Resource, Targeted Oncology, MORE Health, Research to Practice, Foundation Medicine, PeerviewConsulting or Advisory Role: Ignyta, Loxo, TP Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech/Roche, Helsinn Therapeutics, BeiGene, Hengrui Therapeutics, Exelixis, Bayer, Tyra Biosciences, Verastem, Takeda/Millennium, BerGenBio, MORE Health, Lilly, Abbvie, 14ner/Elevation Oncology, Remedica, Archer, Monopteros Therapeutics, Monopteros Therapeutics, Novartis, EMD Serono/Merck, Melendi, Repare TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Foundation MedicinePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Wolters Kluwer (Royalties for Pocket Oncology)Other Relationship: Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Teva, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Puma Biotechnology Robert C. DoebeleEmployment: Rain TherapeuticsLeadership: Rain TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Rain TherapeuticsConsulting or Advisory Role: GreenPeptide, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Bayer, Takeda, Rain Therapeutics, Anchiano, Blueprint Medicines, Foundation MedicinePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Licensing Fees from Abbott Molecular for Patent PCT/US2013/057495, Licensing fees for biologic materials from Genentech, Licensing fees for patent from Rain Therapeutics, Licensing fees for biologic materials from Foundation Medicine, Licensing fees for biologic materials from Black Diamond, Licensing fees for biologic materials from Pearl River, licensing fees for biologic materials from VoronoiTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Rain Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech Manish R. PatelConsulting or Advisory Role: NektarResearch Funding: Merck KGaA, AstraZeneca, Fate Therapeutics, Vyriad Byoung Chul ChoLeadership: Gencurix, Interpark BioStock and Other Ownership Interests: Theravance, Gencurix, Bridgebio, Kanaph Therapeutics, Cyrus Therapeutics, Interpark BioConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Yuhan, Pfizer, Janssen, Takeda, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Lilly, Medpacto, Blueprint Medicines, Kanaph Therapeutics, Bridgebio, Cyrus Therapeutics, Guardant Health, Joseah BIOResearch Funding: Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Mogam Biotechnology Research Institue, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono, Dizal Pharma, MSD, Abbvie, Medpacto, GI Innovation, Lilly, Blueprint Medicines, Interpark BioPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Champions OncologyOther Relationship: DAAN Biotherapeutics Stephen V. LiuConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech, Pfizer, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Regeneron, Apollomics, G1 Therapeutics, Guardant Health, Janssen Oncology, Roche, MSD Oncology, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint Medicines, Inivata, PharmaMar, Daiichi Sankyo/UCB Japan, BeiGeneResearch Funding: Genentech/Roche, Pfizer, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Merck, Lycera, AstraZeneca, Molecular Partners, Blueprint Medicines, Lilly, Rain Therapeutics, Alkermes, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Turning Point Therapeutics, RAPT, Spectrum PharmaceuticalsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, MSD Oncology Myung-Ju AhnHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Takeda, Alpha Pharmaceutical Chao-Hua ChiuHonoraria: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Novartis, Chugai Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono PharmaceuticalConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, MSD, Novartis, Chugai Pharma, LillySpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheimm, Roche, Novartis, Chugai Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Anna F. FaragoEmployment: NovartisHonoraria: Clinical Care Options, Medscape, Peerview, Research to PracticeConsulting or Advisory Role: Abbvie, Loxo, Genentech/Roche, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer, H3 BiomedicineResearch Funding: PharmaMar, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Loxo, Ignyta, Amgen, Genentech/Roche, Bayer, LillyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Abbvie, Bayer, Loxo, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Peerview, Medscape Chia-Chi LinHonoraria: Novartis, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, LillyConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi SankyoTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, BeiGene, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo Christos S. KarapetisHonoraria: Roche, ServierConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, EisaiTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Yu-Chung LiHonoraria: Bayer, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Novartis, Lilly, MSD, RocheResearch Funding: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: MundiPharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, MSD, Roche, Eisai, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanomics Limited Bann-mo DayEmployment: GenentechStock and Other Ownership Interests: GenentechResearch Funding: GenentechTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Genentech David ChenEmployment: Genentech, AmgenStock and Other Ownership Interests: Genentech, AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Genentech, Amgen Timothy R. WilsonEmployment: GenentechStock and Other Ownership Interests: RochePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Methods of treatment with Taselisib Fabrice BarlesiHonoraria: Genentech/Roche, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Merck Serono, MSD Oncology, Takeda, BayerConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD Oncology, Takeda, BayerResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Abbvie, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Lilly, Ipsen, Innate Pharma, Novartis, Merck Serono, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Sanofi/Aventis, TakedaPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Roche/Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, MSD OncologyNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: Receptor tyrosine kinase fusions in colorectal cancers are rare, but potentially therapeutically relevant. We describe clinical, molecular, and pathologic attributes of RTK fusion-associated colorectal cancer., Experimental Design: We identified all cases with RTK fusions in patients with colorectal cancer seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA) who underwent OncoPanel testing between 2013 and 2018. Clinical, histologic, and molecular features were extracted from the patient charts and molecular testing results., Results: We identified 12 driver oncogenic fusions in various RTKs. These fusions occurred exclusively in BRAF and RAS wild-type tumors and were enriched in right-sided and mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-D) colorectal cancers. All of the MMR-D colorectal cancers with RTK fusions were found in tumors with acquired MMR-D due to MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and one was associated with a sessile serrated polyp. Molecular profiles of MMR-D colorectal cancer with RTK fusions largely resembled BRAF V600E-mutated MMR-D colorectal cancer, rather than those secondary to Lynch syndrome. We describe two patients with fusion-associated microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer who derived clinical benefit from therapeutic targeting of their translocation. The first harbored an ALK-CAD fusion and received sequential crizotinib and alectinib therapy for a total of 7.5 months until developing an ALK L1196Q gatekeeper mutation. The second patient, whose tumor contained an ROS1-GOPC fusion, continues to benefit from entrectinib after 9 months of therapy., Conclusions: RTK fusions in colorectal cancer are a rare, but important disease subgroup that occurs in RAS and BRAF wild-type tumors. Despite enrichment in acquired MMR-D tumors, RTK fusions also occur in MSS colorectal cancer and provide an important therapeutic target., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: The development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has been associated with improved efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with urothelial cancer, melanoma, and NSCLC. Whether this association exists in patients with SCLC is currently unknown., Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the relationship between irAEs and immunotherapy efficacy in SCLC. To account for the lead-time bias resulting from the time-dependent nature of irAEs, the development of irAEs was considered as a time-varying covariate in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models., Results: Of the 183 patients treated with immunotherapy, 73 (39.9%) experienced at least one irAE. A total of 42 patients (22.9%) had grade 1 to 2 irAEs, whereas 31 patients (16.9%) had grade 3 to 4 irAEs. The median time of onset to the first irAE was 24 days (interquartile range: 14-55). The baseline clinicopathologic features were well-balanced between patients with and without irAEs. At a median follow-up of 24 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.0-31.6), the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the irAE group than the non-irAE group (3.8 versus 1.3 mo, p < 0.0001). The median overall survival was also significantly longer among patients with irAEs than patients without irAEs (13.8 versus 2.9 mo, p < 0.0001). When analyzed as a time-varying covariate, the development of irAEs was associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.29-0.66], p < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.32-0.71], p < 0.001) in multivariate models., Conclusions: The development of irAEs is associated with improved clinical outcomes for immunotherapy in patients with advanced SCLC., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Background: The selective TRK inhibitor larotrectinib was approved for paediatric and adult patients with advanced TRK fusion-positive solid tumours based on a primary analysis set of 55 patients. The aim of our analysis was to explore the efficacy and long-term safety of larotrectinib in a larger population of patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours., Methods: Patients were enrolled and treated in a phase 1 adult, a phase 1/2 paediatric, or a phase 2 adolescent and adult trial. Some eligibility criteria differed between these studies. For this pooled analysis, eligible patients were aged 1 month or older, with a locally advanced or metastatic non-CNS primary, TRK fusion-positive solid tumour, who had received standard therapy previously if available. This analysis set includes the 55 patients on which approval of larotrectinib was based. Larotrectinib was administered orally (capsule or liquid formulation), on a continuous 28-day schedule, to adults mostly at a dose of 100 mg twice daily, and to paediatric patients mostly at a dose of 100 mg/m 2 (maximum of 100 mg) twice daily. The primary endpoint was objective response as assessed by local investigators in an intention-to-treat analysis. Contributing trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02122913 (active not recruiting), NCT02637687 (recruiting), and NCT02576431 (recruiting)., Findings: Between May 1, 2014, and Feb 19, 2019, 159 patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer were enrolled and treated with larotrectinib. Ages ranged from less than 1 month to 84 years. The proportion of patients with an objective response according to investigator assessment was 121 (79%, 95% CI 72-85) of 153 evaluable patients, with 24 (16%) having complete responses. In a safety population of 260 patients treated regardless of TRK fusion status, the most common grade 3 or 4 larotrectinib-related adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase (eight [3%] of 260 patients), anaemia (six, 2%), and decreased neutrophil count (five [2%]). The most common larotrectinib-related serious adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase (two [<1%] of 260 patients), increased aspartate aminotransferase (two [<1%]), and nausea (two [<1%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred., Interpretation: These data confirm that TRK fusions define a unique molecular subgroup of advanced solid tumours for which larotrectinib is highly active. Safety data indicate that long-term administration of larotrectinib is feasible., Funding: Bayer and Loxo Oncology., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The outcomes of patients with SCLC have not yet been substantially impacted by the revolution in precision oncology, primarily owing to a paucity of genetic alterations in actionable driver oncogenes. Nevertheless, systemic therapies that include immunotherapy are beginning to show promise in the clinic. Although, these results are encouraging, many patients do not respond to, or rapidly recur after, current regimens, necessitating alternative or complementary therapeutic strategies. In this review, we discuss ongoing investigations into the pathobiology of this recalcitrant cancer and the therapeutic vulnerabilities that are exposed by the disease state. Included within this discussion, is a snapshot of the current biomarker and clinical trial landscapes for SCLC. Finally, we identify key knowledge gaps that should be addressed to advance the field in pursuit of reduced SCLC mortality. This review largely summarizes work presented at the Third Biennial International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer SCLC Meeting., (Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Gene fusions involving NTRK1 , NTRK2 and NTRK3 are oncogenic drivers across a wide variety of cancer types. Inhibitors of the chimeric TRKA/B/C protein kinases encoded by these fusions are now available, including larotrectinib, a potent and highly selective oral drug. Integrated data from three trials demonstrate substantial clinical activity of larotrectinib in patients with many different types of cancers harboring NTRK fusions. Larotrectinib has received accelerated approval from both the US FDA and the EMA. Resistance mutations have been observed in the kinase domains of the NTRK fusion genes and development of next-generation tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors designed to overcome such resistance mutations is being actively pursued in clinical trials and ongoing drug discovery efforts.

Background: Entrectinib is a potent inhibitor of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) A, B, and C, which has been shown to have anti-tumour activity against NTRK gene fusion-positive solid tumours, including CNS activity due to its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. We present an integrated efficacy and safety analysis of patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumours harbouring oncogenic NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 gene fusions treated in three ongoing, early-phase trials., Methods: An integrated database comprised the pivotal datasets of three, ongoing phase 1 or 2 clinical trials (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2), which enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic or locally advanced NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours who received entrectinib orally at a dose of at least 600 mg once per day in a capsule. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and could have received previous anti-cancer therapy (except previous TRK inhibitors). The primary endpoints, the proportion of patients with an objective response and median duration of response, were evaluated by blinded independent central review in the efficacy-evaluable population (ie, patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours who were TRK inhibitor-naive and had received at least one dose of entrectinib). Overall safety evaluable population included patients from STARTRK-1, STARTRK-2, ALKA-372-001, and STARTRK-NG (NCT02650401; treating young adult and paediatric patients [aged ≤21 years]), who received at least one dose of entrectinib, regardless of tumour type or gene rearrangement. NTRK fusion-positive safety evaluable population comprised all patients who have received at least one dose of entrectinib regardless of dose or follow-up. These ongoing studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02097810 (STARTRK-1) and NCT02568267 (STARTRK-2), and EudraCT, 2012-000148-88 (ALKA-372-001)., Findings: Patients were enrolled in ALKA-372-001 from Oct 26, 2012, to March 27, 2018; in STARTRK-1 from Aug 7, 2014, to May 10, 2018; and in STARTRK-2 from Nov 19, 2015 (enrolment is ongoing). At the data cutoff date for this analysis (May 31, 2018) the efficacy-evaluable population comprised 54 adults with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours comprising ten different tumour types and 19 different histologies. Median follow-up was 12.9 months (IQR 8·77-18·76). 31 (57%; 95% CI 43·2-70·8) of 54 patients had an objective response, of which four (7%) were complete responses and 27 (50%) partial reponses. Median duration of response was 10 months (95% CI 7·1 to not estimable). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events in both safety populations were increased weight (seven [10%] of 68 patients in the NTRK fusion-positive safety population and in 18 [5%] of 355 patients in the overall safety-evaluable population) and anaemia (8 [12%] and 16 [5%]). The most common serious treatment-related adverse events were nervous system disorders (three [4%] of 68 patients and ten [3%] of 355 patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred., Interpretation: Entrectinib induced durable and clinically meaningful responses in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours, and was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile. These results show that entrectinib is a safe and active treatment option for patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours. These data highlight the need to routinely test for NTRK fusions to broaden the therapeutic options available for patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours., Funding: Ignyta/F Hoffmann-La Roche., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Although extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly responsive to first-line therapy, virtually all patients develop resistance with short survival. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting delta-like 3 protein (DLL3). This open-label, single-arm, phase II study (TRINITY) assessed safety and efficacy of Rova-T in patients with DLL3-expressing SCLC in the third-line and beyond (3L+) setting., Patients and Methods: Patients with DLL3-expressing SCLC (determined by mouse antibody immunohistochemistry [IHC] assay), and ≥2 prior regimens, received 0.3 mg/kg Rova-T once every 6 weeks for two cycles. During study, a rabbit antibody IHC assay was developed and used for the final analysis, with DLL3-positive and DLL3-high defined as ≥25% and ≥75% of tumor cells positive for DLL3, respectively. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Among 339 patients enrolled, 261 (77%) had two prior lines of therapy and 78 (23%) had ≥3. DLL3-high and DLL3-positive tumors by rabbit IHC were seen in 238 (70%) and 287 (85%) patients, respectively. The remaining 52 (15%) were DLL3-negative only by rabbit IHC or had missing results. ORR was 12.4%, 14.3%, and 13.2% in all, DLL3-high, and DLL3-positive patients, respectively. Median OS was 5.6 months in all patients and 5.7 months in DLL3-high patients. The most common adverse events (AE) were fatigue, photosensitivity reaction, and pleural effusion. Grade 3-5 AEs were seen in 213 (63%) patients., Conclusions: Rova-T is the first targeted agent in SCLC to use DLL3, a novel biomarker. However, results demonstrate modest clinical activity in 3L+ SCLC, with associated toxicities., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Acquired resistance to next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is often driven by secondary ALK mutations. Here, we investigated utility of plasma genotyping for identifying ALK resistance mutations at relapse on next-generation ALK TKIs., Experimental Design: We analyzed 106 plasma specimens from 84 patients with advanced ALK -positive lung cancer treated with second- and third-generation ALK TKIs using a commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform (Guardant360). Tumor biopsies from TKI-resistant lesions underwent targeted NGS to identify ALK mutations., Results: By genotyping plasma, we detected an ALK mutation in 46 (66%) of 70 patients relapsing on a second-generation ALK TKI. When post-alectinib plasma and tumor specimens were compared, there was no difference in frequency of ALK mutations (67% vs. 63%), but plasma specimens were more likely to harbor ≥2 ALK mutations (24% vs. 2%, P = 0.004). Among 29 patients relapsing on lorlatinib, plasma genotyping detected an ALK mutation in 22 (76%), including 14 (48%) with ≥2 ALK mutations. The most frequent combinations of ALK mutations were G1202R/L1196M and D1203N/1171N. Detection of ≥2 ALK mutations was significantly more common in patients relapsing on lorlatinib compared with second-generation ALK TKIs (48% vs. 23%, P = 0.017). Among 15 patients who received lorlatinib after a second-generation TKI, serial plasma analysis demonstrated that eight (53%) acquired ≥1 new ALK mutations on lorlatinib., Conclusions: ALK resistance mutations increase with each successive generation of ALK TKI and may be underestimated by tumor genotyping. Sequential treatment with increasingly potent ALK TKIs may promote acquisition of ALK resistance mutations leading to treatment-refractory compound ALK mutations., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive lung cancer subtype with extremely poor prognosis. No targetable genetic driver events have been identified, and the treatment landscape for this disease has remained nearly unchanged for over 30 years. Here, we have taken a CRISPR-based screening approach to identify genetic vulnerabilities in SCLC that may serve as potential therapeutic targets. We used a single-guide RNA (sgRNA) library targeting ~5000 genes deemed to encode "druggable" proteins to perform loss-of-function genetic screens in a panel of cell lines derived from autochthonous genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of SCLC, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Cross-cancer analyses allowed us to identify SCLC-selective vulnerabilities. In particular, we observed enhanced sensitivity of SCLC cells toward disruption of the pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway. Pharmacological inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), a key enzyme in this pathway, reduced the viability of SCLC cells in vitro and strongly suppressed SCLC tumor growth in human patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and in an autochthonous mouse model. These results indicate that DHODH inhibition may be an approach to treat SCLC., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.)

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy in which inhibitors of PARP have modest single-agent activity. We performed a phase I/II trial of combination olaparib tablets and temozolomide (OT) in patients with previously treated SCLC. We established a recommended phase II dose of olaparib 200 mg orally twice daily with temozolomide 75 mg/m 2 daily, both on days 1 to 7 of a 21-day cycle, and expanded to a total of 50 patients. The confirmed overall response rate was 41.7% (20/48 evaluable); median progression-free survival was 4.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8-5.7]; and median overall survival was 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-11.3). Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) from trial patients recapitulated clinical OT responses, enabling a 32-PDX coclinical trial. This revealed a correlation between low basal expression of inflammatory-response genes and cross-resistance to both OT and standard first-line chemotherapy (etoposide/platinum). These results demonstrate a promising new therapeutic strategy in SCLC and uncover a molecular signature of those tumors most likely to respond. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrate substantial clinical activity of combination olaparib/temozolomide in relapsed SCLC, revealing a promising new therapeutic strategy for this highly recalcitrant malignancy. Through an integrated coclinical trial in PDXs, we then identify a molecular signature predictive of response to OT, and describe the common molecular features of cross-resistant SCLC. See related commentary by Pacheco and Byers, p. 1340 . This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1325 ., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

DNA damage repair (DDR) inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) have each individually shown modest clinical activity in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Recently, Sen and colleagues (Cancer Discov. 2019;https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1020) demonstrated that DDR inhibition can activate the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) innate immune pathway, providing strong rationale for combining DDR inhibition and ICB to treat SCLC., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Lung cancer patients with tumors harboring actionable alterations can achieve very durable responses to first-line targeted therapy. However, identifying targetable alterations using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a complex and time-intensive process. As actionable genetic alterations are enriched in lung cancers arising in patients with limited smoking history, we designed a workflow to expedite NGS testing for this group., Methods: We developed a protocol to allow for next-day extraction of nucleic acids from frozen tissue. Specimens were designated as high priority during sequencing. We determined the interval between biopsy and NGS results to evaluate whether the workflow reduced the pre-analytical period and in-laboratory turnaround time and allowed for rapid initiation of genotype-matched therapy., Results: Between January 2017 and May 2018, 21 patients participated in the expedited sequencing program. The median interval between biopsy and NGS results was 10.7 days. Six patients received results within 1 week of biopsy. Performing molecular analysis on frozen tissue and prioritizing sequencing and analysis of these specimens reduced the pre-analytical period from 3.5 to 1.3 days (p < 0.0001) and shortened in-laboratory turnaround time by 3 days (11.8 versus 8.4 business days, p < 0.0001). Ninety-three percent of patients with an actionable molecular alteration received first-line targeted therapy. The median time-to-initiation of treatment was 19.7 days from biopsy., Conclusions: Sequencing and analyzing nucleic acids from frozen tissue is a practical strategy for shortening the time to matched therapy. The significant advantage of upfront treatment with targeted therapies in subsets of lung cancer patients provides rationale for developing workflows that accelerate comprehensive molecular analysis., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: For patients with recurrent SCLC, topotecan remains the only approved second-line treatment, and the outcomes are poor. CheckMate 032 is a phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label study of nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in SCLC or other advanced/metastatic solid tumors previously treated with one or more platinum-based chemotherapies. We report results of third- or later-line nivolumab monotherapy treatment in SCLC., Methods: In this analysis, patients with limited-stage or extensive-stage SCLC and disease progression after two or more chemotherapy regimens received nivolumab monotherapy, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety., Results: Between December 4, 2013, and November 30, 2016, 109 patients began receiving third- or later-line nivolumab monotherapy. At a median follow-up of 28.3 months (from first dose to database lock), the objective response rate was 11.9% (95% confidence interval: 6.5-19.5) with a median duration of response of 17.9 months (range 3.0-42.1). At 6 months, 17.2% of patients were progression-free. The 12-month and 18-month overall survival rates were 28.3% and 20.0%, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11.9% of patients. Three patients (2.8%) discontinued because of treatment-related adverse events., Conclusions: Nivolumab monotherapy provided durable responses and was well tolerated as a third- or later-line treatment for recurrent SCLC. These results suggest that nivolumab monotherapy is an effective third- or later-line treatment for this patient population., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Approximately 3% to 10% of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) -mutant non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) undergo transformation to small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), but their clinical course is poorly characterized., Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with EGFR-mutant SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas seen at our eight institutions. Demographics, disease features, and outcomes were analyzed., Results: We included 67 patients-38 women and 29 men; EGFR mutations included exon 19 deletion (69%), L858R (25%), and other (6%). At the initial lung cancer diagnosis, 58 patients had NSCLC and nine had de novo SCLC or mixed histology. All but these nine patients received one or more EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor before SCLC transformation. Median time to transformation was 17.8 months (95% CI, 14.3 to 26.2 months). After transformation, both platinum-etoposide and taxanes yielded high response rates, but none of 17 patients who received immunotherapy experienced a response. Median overall survival since diagnosis was 31.5 months (95% CI, 24.8 to 41.3 months), whereas median survival since the time of SCLC transformation was 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 13.7 months). Fifty-nine patients had tissue genotyping at first evidence of SCLC. All maintained their founder EGFR mutation, and 15 of 19 with prior EGFR T790M positivity were T790 wild-type at transformation. Other recurrent mutations included TP53, Rb1, and PIK3CA. Re-emergence of NSCLC clones was identified in some cases. CNS metastases were frequent after transformation., Conclusion: There is a growing appreciation that EGFR-mutant NSCLCs can undergo SCLC transformation. We demonstrate that this occurs at an average of 17.8 months after diagnosis and cases are often characterized by Rb1, TP53, and PIK3CA mutations. Responses to platinum-etoposide and taxanes are frequent, but checkpoint inhibitors yielded no responses. Additional investigation is needed to better elucidate optimal strategies for this group.

Background: NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 gene fusions (NTRK gene fusions) occur in a range of adult cancers. Larotrectinib is a potent and highly selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of TRK kinases and has demonstrated activity in patients with tumours harbouring NTRK gene fusions., Patients and Methods: This multi-centre, phase I dose escalation study enrolled adults with metastatic solid tumours, regardless of NTRK gene fusion status. Key inclusion criteria included evaluable and/or measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate organ function. Larotrectinib was administered orally once or twice daily, on a continuous 28-day schedule, in increasing dose levels according to a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme. The primary end point was the safety of larotrectinib, including dose-limiting toxicity., Results: Seventy patients (8 with tumours with NTRK gene fusions; 62 with tumours without a documented NTRK gene fusion) were enrolled to 6 dose cohorts. There were four dose-limiting toxicities; none led to study drug discontinuation. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Larotrectinib-related adverse events were predominantly grade 1; none were grade 4 or 5. The most common grade 3 larotrectinib-related adverse event was anaemia [4 (6%) of 70 patients]. A dose of 100 mg twice daily was recommended for phase II studies based on tolerability and antitumour activity. In patients with evaluable TRK fusion cancer, the objective response rate by independent review was 100% (eight of the eight patients). Eight (12%) of the 67 assessable patients overall had an objective response by investigator assessment. Median duration of response was not reached. Larotrectinib had limited activity in tumours with NTRK mutations or amplifications. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed exposure was generally proportional to administered dose., Conclusions: Larotrectinib was well tolerated, demonstrated activity in all patients with tumours harbouring NTRK gene fusions, and represents a new treatment option for such patients., Clincaltrials.gov Number: NCT02122913., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Lurbinectedin is an inhibitor of active transcription of protein-coding genes, causing DNA-break accumulation, apoptosis and modulation of the tumor microenvironment. Early-phase clinical trials indicate promising activity of lurbinectedin in small-cell lung cancer. Here, we describe the rationale and design of ATLANTIS (NCT02566993), an open-label, randomized, multicenter Phase III study to compare the efficacy of lurbinectedin and doxorubicin combination with standard-of-care chemotherapy, investigator's choice of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine or topotecan, in patients with small-cell lung cancer that has progressed following one line of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point is overall survival and key secondary end points include progression-free survival, best tumor response and duration of response, each assessed by independent review committee.

BH3 mimetic drugs, which inhibit prosurvival BCL2 family proteins, have limited single-agent activity in solid tumor models. The potential of BH3 mimetics for these cancers may depend on their ability to potentiate the apoptotic response to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Using a novel class of potent and selective MCL1 inhibitors, we demonstrate that concurrent MEK + MCL1 inhibition induces apoptosis and tumor regression in KRAS -mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) models, which respond poorly to MEK inhibition alone. Susceptibility to BH3 mimetics that target either MCL1 or BCL-xL was determined by the differential binding of proapoptotic BCL2 proteins to MCL1 or BCL-xL, respectively. The efficacy of dual MEK + MCL1 blockade was augmented by prior transient exposure to BCL-xL inhibitors, which promotes the binding of proapoptotic BCL2 proteins to MCL1. This suggests a novel strategy for integrating BH3 mimetics that target different BCL2 family proteins for KRAS -mutant NSCLC. SIGNIFICANCE: Defining the molecular basis for MCL1 versus BCL-xL dependency will be essential for effective prioritization of BH3 mimetic combination therapies in the clinic. We discover a novel strategy for integrating BCL-xL and MCL1 inhibitors to drive and subsequently exploit apoptotic dependencies of KRAS -mutant NSCLCs treated with MEK inhibitors. See related commentary by Leber et al., p. 1511 . This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1494 ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: The second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor alectinib recently showed superior efficacy compared to the first-generation ALK inhibitor crizotinib in advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC, establishing alectinib as the new standard first-line therapy. Brigatinib, another second-generation ALK inhibitor, has shown substantial activity in patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC; however, its activity in the alectinib-refractory setting is unknown., Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study was performed at three institutions. Patients were eligible if they had advanced, alectinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC and were treated with brigatinib. Medical records were reviewed to determine clinical outcomes., Results: Twenty-two patients were eligible for this study. Confirmed objective responses to brigatinib were observed in 3 of 18 patients (17%) with measurable disease. Nine patients (50%) had stable disease on brigatinib. The median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-5.6 months) with a median duration of treatment of 5.7 months (95% CI: 1.8-6.2 months). Among 9 patients in this study who underwent post-alectinib/pre-brigatinib biopsies, 5 had an ALK I1171X or V1180L resistance mutation; of these, 1 had a confirmed partial response and 3 had stable disease on brigatinib. One patient had an ALK G1202R mutation in a post-alectinib/pre-brigatinib biopsy, and had progressive disease as the best overall response to brigatinib., Conclusions: Brigatinib has limited clinical activity in alectinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC. Additional studies are needed to establish biomarkers of response to brigatinib and to identify effective therapeutic options for alectinib-resistant ALK-positive NSCLC patients., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patient-derived xenografts (PDX) can be generated from biopsies or circulating tumor cells (CTC), though scarcity of tissue and low efficiency of tumor growth have previously limited these approaches. Applying an established clinical-translational pipeline for tissue collection and an automated microfluidic platform for CTC enrichment, we generated 17 biopsy-derived PDXs and 17 CTC-derived PDXs in a 2-year timeframe, at 89% and 38% efficiency, respectively. Whole-exome sequencing showed that somatic alterations are stably maintained between patient tumors and PDXs. Early-passage PDXs maintain the genomic and transcriptional profiles of the founder PDX. In vivo treatment with etoposide and platinum (EP) in 30 PDX models demonstrated greater sensitivity in PDXs from EP-naïve patients, and resistance to EP corresponded to increased expression of a MYC gene signature. Finally, serial CTC-derived PDXs generated from an individual patient at multiple time points accurately recapitulated the evolving drug sensitivities of that patient's disease. Collectively, this work highlights the translational potential of this strategy. Significance: Effective translational research utilizing SCLC PDX models requires both efficient generation of models from patients and fidelity of those models in representing patient tumor characteristics. We present approaches for efficient generation of PDXs from both biopsies and CTCs, and demonstrate that these models capture the mutational landscape and functional features of the donor tumors. Cancer Discov; 8(5); 600-15. ©2018 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 517 ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Fusions involving one of three tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRK) occur in diverse cancers in children and adults. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib, a highly selective TRK inhibitor, in adults and children who had tumors with these fusions., Methods: We enrolled patients with consecutively and prospectively identified TRK fusion-positive cancers, detected by molecular profiling as routinely performed at each site, into one of three protocols: a phase 1 study involving adults, a phase 1-2 study involving children, or a phase 2 study involving adolescents and adults. The primary end point for the combined analysis was the overall response rate according to independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety., Results: A total of 55 patients, ranging in age from 4 months to 76 years, were enrolled and treated. Patients had 17 unique TRK fusion-positive tumor types. The overall response rate was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61 to 85) according to independent review and 80% (95% CI, 67 to 90) according to investigator assessment. At 1 year, 71% of the responses were ongoing and 55% of the patients remained progression-free. The median duration of response and progression-free survival had not been reached. At a median follow-up of 9.4 months, 86% of the patients with a response (38 of 44 patients) were continuing treatment or had undergone surgery that was intended to be curative. Adverse events were predominantly of grade 1, and no adverse event of grade 3 or 4 that was considered by the investigators to be related to larotrectinib occurred in more than 5% of patients. No patient discontinued larotrectinib owing to drug-related adverse events., Conclusions: Larotrectinib had marked and durable antitumor activity in patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer, regardless of the age of the patient or of the tumor type. (Funded by Loxo Oncology and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02122913 , NCT02637687 , and NCT02576431 .).

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. Despite over 30 years of clinical research, little progress has been made in the management of SCLC, and outcomes remain poor. Here, we review the current clinical standards for management of SCLC and the data supporting these strategies., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: AF Farago acts consulting or advisory role for Abbive, Pharmamar, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Intervention Insights, Honorarium from Foundation Medicine. FK Keane has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Purpose: ALK rearrangements predict for sensitivity to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, responses to ALK TKIs are generally short-lived. Serial molecular analysis is an informative strategy for identifying genetic mediators of resistance. Although multiple studies support the clinical benefits of repeat tissue sampling, the clinical utility of longitudinal circulating tumor DNA analysis has not been established in ALK-positive lung cancer., Methods: Using a 566-gene hybrid-capture next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay, we performed longitudinal analysis of plasma specimens from 22 ALK-positive patients with acquired resistance to ALK TKIs to track the evolution of resistance during treatment. To determine tissue-plasma concordance, we compared plasma findings to results of repeat biopsies., Results: At progression, we detected an ALK fusion in plasma from 19 (86%) of 22 patients, and identified ALK resistance mutations in plasma specimens from 11 (50%) patients. There was 100% agreement between tissue- and plasma-detected ALK fusions. Among 16 cases where contemporaneous plasma and tissue specimens were available, we observed 100% concordance between ALK mutation calls. ALK mutations emerged and disappeared during treatment with sequential ALK TKIs, suggesting that plasma mutation profiles were dependent on the specific TKI administered. ALK G1202R, the most frequent plasma mutation detected after progression on a second-generation TKI, was consistently suppressed during treatment with lorlatinib., Conclusions: Plasma genotyping by NGS is an effective method for detecting ALK fusions and ALK mutations in patients progressing on ALK TKIs. The correlation between plasma ALK mutations and response to distinct ALK TKIs highlights the potential for plasma analysis to guide selection of ALK-directed therapies., Competing Interests: The remaining authors have no financial interests to declare.

Purpose: Targeted therapy is the cornerstone of treatment of advanced EGFR -mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Next-generation sequencing (NGS), the preferred method for genotyping, typically requires several weeks. Here, we assessed workflows designed to rapidly identify patients with actionable EGFR mutations and reduce time to initiation (TTI) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed therapy., Patients and Methods: We performed rapid testing for EGFR L858R mutations and exon 19 deletions on paraffin-embedded or frozen section biopsy specimens from newly diagnosed patients with metastatic NSCLC by using an EGFR -specific assay (rapid test). To determine clinical utility, we assessed concordance with NGS results, turnaround time, and TTI of EGFR therapy, and we evaluated reimbursement data., Results: Between January 2015 and September 2017, we performed 243 rapid EGFR tests and identified EGFR mutations in 43 patients (18%). With NGS results as a reference, sensitivity and specificity of the rapid EGFR polymerase chain reaction assay were 98% and 100%, respectively. The median turnaround time for NGS was 14 days, compared with 7 days for rapid testing ( P < .001). In the rapid group, 95% of patients received an EGFR inhibitor in the first-line setting. The median TTI of EGFR therapy was significantly shorter in the rapid cohort when compared with 121 historical cases (22 v 37 days; P = .01). Escalation of the initiative into an interdisciplinary ultra-rapid next-day frozen-section workflow for highly symptomatic patients (n = 8) resulted in a reduction in the median (± standard deviation) turnaround time to 1 ± 0.4 days and allowed several patients to initiate therapy within 1 week of biopsy. An extended 9-month clinical evaluation phase confirmed operational sustainability (turnaround times: ultra-rapid, 0.81 ± 0.4 days; rapid, 3 ± 1.5 days), and a 63% reimbursement rate indicated financial sustainability., Conclusion: Rapid genotyping facilitates earlier initiation of EGFR-directed therapies without compromising NGS workflows.

Purpose: Gene rearrangements involving NTRK1/2/3 can generate fusion oncoproteins containing the kinase domains of TRKA/B/C, respectively. These fusions are rare in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with frequency previously estimated to be <1%. Inhibition of TRK signaling has led to dramatic responses across tumor types with NTRK fusions. Despite the potential benefit of identifying these fusions, the clinicopathologic features of NTRK fusion-positive NSCLCs are not well characterized., Methods: We compiled a database of NSCLC cases harboring NTRK fusions. We characterized the clinical, molecular, and histologic features of these cases with central review of histology., Results: We identified 11 NSCLC cases harboring NTRK gene fusions verified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and with available clinical and pathologic data, forming the study cohort. Fusions involved NTRK1 (7 cases) and NTRK3 (4 cases), with 5 and 2 distinct fusion partners, respectively. Cohort patients were 55% male, with a median age at diagnosis of 47.6 years (range 25.3-86.0) and a median pack year history of 0 (range 0-58). 73% of patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis. No concurrent alterations in KRAS , EGFR , ALK , ROS1 , or other known oncogenic drivers were identified. Nine cases were adenocarcinoma, including 2 invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas and 1 adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features; one was squamous cell carcinoma; and one was neuroendocrine carcinoma. By collating data on 4872 consecutively screened NSCLC cases from unique patients, we estimate a frequency of NTRK fusions in NSCLC of 0.23% (95% CI 0.11-0.40)., Conclusion: NTRK fusions occur in NSCLCs across genders, ages, smoking histories, and histologies. Given the potent clinical activity of TRK inhibitors, we advocate that all NSCLCs be screened for NTRK fusions using a multiplexed NGS-based fusion assay., Competing Interests: Relevant conflicts of interest: AFF has received consultant fees from AbbVie, PharmaMar, Loxo Oncology; research funding (to institution) from Loxo Oncology, Ignyta, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Merck, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Novartis. RCD has received consultant/advisory board fees from Ariad, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Spectrum, and Ignyta; licensing fees from Abbott Molecular and Ignyta; stock ownership in Rain Therapeutics. VWZ has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Takeda, and Biocept, and consultant fees from TP Therapeutics. DLA has received consultant fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and AbbVie LPL has equity interest and royalties from exclusive license of AMP technology to ArcherDx and has received consultant fees from ArcherDx AJI has received consulting fees for Debiopharm Group, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Roche, research Funding from Blueprint Medicines, and has equity interest and royalties from exclusive license of AMP technology to ArcherDx. SHIO has received consultant/advisory board fees from ARIAD/Takeda, Pfizer, Genentech/Roche, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Ignyta, Foundation Medicine Inc, member of the speaker bureau of Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, ARIAD/Takeda, and Merck; a member of the scientific advisory board of TP Therapeutics Inc and stock ownership in TP Therapeutics Inc. ATS has received consultant fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Ariad/Takeda, Genentech/Roche, Ignyta, Loxo Oncology, Blueprint medicines, KSQ therapeutics, Natera. MMK has received consultant fees from Merrimack Pharmaceuticals and H3 Biomedicine. AD has received consultant/advisory board fees from Ignyta, Loxo Oncology, TP Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech/Roche, Takeda/Ariad. MST, SK, AIS, TAB, EBH, MEA, RB, NKH, JKL have no relevant disclosures.

Personalized cancer therapy is based on a patient's tumor lineage, histopathology, expression analyses, and/or tumor DNA or RNA analysis. Here, we aim to develop an in vitro functional assay of a patient's living cancer cells that could complement these approaches. We present methods for developing cell cultures from tumor biopsies and identify the types of samples and culture conditions associated with higher efficiency of model establishment. Toward the application of patient-derived cell cultures for personalized care, we established an immunofluorescence-based functional assay that quantifies cancer cell responses to targeted therapy in mixed cell cultures. Assaying patient-derived lung cancer cultures with this method showed promise in modeling patient response for diagnostic use. This platform should allow for the development of co-clinical trial studies to prospectively test the value of drug profiling on tumor-biopsy-derived cultures to direct patient care., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The discovery of gene rearrangements involving the receptor tyrosine kinase genes ALK and ROS1 has revolutionized management of the subset of non-small cell lung cancers characterized by these alterations. The oncogenic fusion proteins expressed in these tumors drive cancer cell growth and survival, and targeted inhibition of this signaling can lead to dramatic and durable responses in patients. While the best characterized gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involve ALK and ROS1 , fusions involving other kinases including RET , NTRK , EGFR and BRAF are now established as additional targetable drivers. Here we review data supporting the roles of these fusions as oncogenic drivers, and the potential for targeting these fusions for improved clinical outcomes. These discoveries should encourage multiplexed molecular profiling of lung cancers using next-generation platforms which identify these gene fusions in order to expand treatment options for patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: AF Farago serves as consulting or advisory role for Abbive, Pharmamar, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Intervention Insights, and received honorarium from Foundation Medicine. CG Azzoli has no conflicts of interest to declare.

The tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) family includes TRKA, TRKB, and TRKC proteins, which are encoded by NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 genes, respectively. Binding of neurotrophins to TRK proteins induces receptor dimerization, phosphorylation, and activation of the downstream signaling cascades via PI3K, RAS/MAPK/ERK, and PLC-gamma. TRK pathway aberrations, including gene fusions, protein overexpression, and single nucleotide alterations, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of many cancer types, with NTRK gene fusions being the most well validated oncogenic events to date. Although the NTRK gene fusions are infrequent in most cancer types, certain rare tumor types are predominately driven by these events. Conversely, in more common histologies, such as lung and colorectal cancers, prevalence of the NTRK fusions is well below 5%. Selective inhibition of TRK signaling may therefore be beneficial among patients whose tumors vary in histologies, but share underlying oncogenic NTRK gene alterations. Currently, several TRK-targeting compounds are in clinical development. The ongoing Phase 2 trials with entrectinib and LOXO-101, two of the leading TRK inhibitors, are designed as 'basket trials', inclusive of patients whose tumors harbor NTRK gene fusions, independent of histology. Additional Phase 1 studies of other TRK inhibitors, including MGCD516, PLX7486, DS-6051b, and TSR-011, are underway. Interim data examining NTRK-rearranged tumors treated with entrectinib or LOXO-101 demonstrate encouraging activity, with patients achieving rapid and durable responses. Consequently, both drugs have achieved orphan designation from regulatory agencies, and efforts are underway to further expedite their development., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Entrectinib, a potent oral inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases TRKA/B/C, ROS1, and ALK, was evaluated in two phase I studies in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including patients with active central nervous system (CNS) disease. Here, we summarize the overall safety and report the antitumor activity of entrectinib in a cohort of patients with tumors harboring NTRK1/2/3, ROS1 , or ALK gene fusions, naïve to prior TKI treatment targeting the specific gene, and who were treated at doses that achieved therapeutic exposures consistent with the recommended phase II dose. Entrectinib was well tolerated, with predominantly Grades 1/2 adverse events that were reversible with dose modification. Responses were observed in non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, mammary analogue secretory carcinoma, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma, as early as 4 weeks after starting treatment and lasting as long as >2 years. Notably, a complete CNS response was achieved in a patient with SQSTM1-NTRK1 -rearranged lung cancer. Significance: Gene fusions of NTRK1/2/3, ROS1 , and ALK (encoding TRKA/B/C, ROS1, and ALK, respectively) lead to constitutive activation of oncogenic pathways. Entrectinib was shown to be well tolerated and active against those gene fusions in solid tumors, including in patients with primary or secondary CNS disease. Cancer Discov; 7(4); 400-9. ©2017 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 339 ., (©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Glioneuronal tumors constitute a histologically diverse group of primary central nervous system neoplasms that are typically slow-growing and managed conservatively. Genetic alterations associated with glioneuronal tumors include BRAF mutations and oncogenic fusions. To further characterize this group of tumors, we collected a cohort of 26 glioneuronal tumors and performed in-depth genomic analysis. We identified mutations in BRAF (34%) and oncogenic fusions (30%), consistent with previously published reports. In addition, we discovered novel oncogenic fusions involving members of the NTRK gene family in a subset of our cohort. One-patient with BCAN exon 13 fused to NTRK1 exon 11 initially underwent a subtotal resection for a 4th ventricular glioneuronal tumor but ultimately required additional therapy due to progressive, symptomatic disease. Given the patient's targetable fusion, the patient was enrolled on a clinical trial with entrectinib, a pan-Trk, ROS1, and ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) inhibitor. The patient was treated for 11 months and during this time volumetric analysis of the lesion demonstrated a maximum reduction of 60% in the contrast-enhancing tumor compared to his pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging study. The radiologic response was associated with resolution of his clinical symptoms and was maintained for 11 months on treatment. This report of a BCAN-NTRK1 fusion in glioneuronal tumors highlights its clinical importance as a novel, targetable alteration., Competing Interests: A.J.I., L.P.L. and Z.Z. own equity in ArcherDx a license of the AMP technology.

Competing Interests: AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO’s conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or po.ascopubs.org/site/ifc.

Purpose: The ROS1 tyrosine kinase is activated through ROS1 gene rearrangements in 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), conferring sensitivity to treatment with the ALK/ROS1/MET inhibitor crizotinib. Currently, insights into patterns of metastatic spread and mechanisms of crizotinib resistance among ROS1 -positive patients are limited., Patients and Methods: We reviewed clinical and radiographic imaging data of patients with ROS1 - and ALK -positive NSCLC in order to compare patterns of metastatic spread at initial metastatic diagnosis. To determine molecular mechanisms of crizotinib resistance, we also analyzed repeat biopsies from a cohort of ROS1 -positive patients progressing on crizotinib., Results: We identified 39 and 196 patients with advanced ROS1- and ALK- positive NSCLC, respectively. ROS1 -positive patients had significantly lower rates of extrathoracic metastases ( ROS1 59.0%, ALK 83.2%, P =0.002), including lower rates of brain metastases ( ROS1 19.4%, ALK 39.1%; P = 0.033), at initial metastatic diagnosis. Despite similar overall survival between ALK- and ROS1- positive patients treated with crizotinib (median 3.0 versus 2.5 years, respectively; P =0.786), ROS1- positive patients also had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of brain metastases (34% vs. 73% at 5 years; P <0.0001). Additionally, we identified 16 patients who underwent a total of 17 repeat biopsies following progression on crizotinib. ROS1 resistance mutations were identified in 53% of specimens, including 9/14 (64%) non-brain metastasis specimens. ROS1 mutations included: G2032R (41%), D2033N (6%), and S1986F (6%)., Conclusions: Compared to ALK rearrangements, ROS1 rearrangements are associated with lower rates of extrathoracic metastases, including fewer brain metastases, at initial metastatic diagnosis. ROS1 resistance mutations, particularly G2032R, appear to be the predominant mechanism of resistance to crizotinib, underscoring the need to develop novel ROS1 inhibitors with activity against these resistant mutants.

Purpose: PD-1 inhibitors are established agents in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, only a subset of patients derives clinical benefit. To determine the activity of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors within clinically relevant molecular subgroups, we retrospectively evaluated response patterns among EGFR-mutant, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive, and EGFR wild-type/ALK-negative patients., Experimental Design: We identified 58 patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Objective response rates (ORR) were assessed using RECIST v1.1. PD-L1 expression and CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were evaluated by IHC., Results: Objective responses were observed in 1 of 28 (3.6%) EGFR-mutant or ALK-positive patients versus 7 of 30 (23.3%) EGFR wild-type and ALK-negative/unknown patients (P = 0.053). The ORR among never- or light- (≤10 pack years) smokers was 4.2% versus 20.6% among heavy smokers (P = 0.123). In an independent cohort of advanced EGFR-mutant (N = 68) and ALK-positive (N = 27) patients, PD-L1 expression was observed in 24%/16%/11% and 63%/47%/26% of pre-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) biopsies using cutoffs of ≥1%, ≥5%, and ≥50% tumor cell staining, respectively. Among EGFR-mutant patients with paired, pre- and post-TKI-resistant biopsies (N = 57), PD-L1 expression levels changed after resistance in 16 (28%) patients. Concurrent PD-L1 expression (≥5%) and high levels of CD8(+) TILs (grade ≥2) were observed in only 1 pretreatment (2.1%) and 5 resistant (11.6%) EGFR-mutant specimens and was not observed in any ALK-positive, pre- or post-TKI specimens., Conclusions: NSCLCs harboring EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements are associated with low ORRs to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Low rates of concurrent PD-L1 expression and CD8(+) TILs within the tumor microenvironment may underlie these clinical observations. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4585-93. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Gettinger and Politi, p. 4539., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Chromosomal rearrangements involving neurotrophic tyrosine kinase 1 (NTRK1) occur in a subset of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and other solid tumor malignancies, leading to expression of an oncogenic TrkA fusion protein. Entrectinib (RXDX-101) is an orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitor, including TrkA. We sought to determine the frequency of NTRK1 rearrangements in NSCLC and to assess the clinical activity of entrectinib., Methods: We screened 1378 cases of NSCLC using anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction (AMP). A patient with an NTRK1 gene rearrangement was enrolled onto a Phase 1 dose escalation study of entrectinib in adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic tumors (NCT02097810). We assessed safety and response to treatment., Results: We identified NTRK1 gene rearrangements at a frequency of 0.1% in this cohort. A patient with stage IV lung adenocrcinoma with an SQSTM1-NTRK1 fusion transcript expression was treated with entrectinib. Entrectinib was well tolerated, with no grade 3-4 adverse events. Within three weeks of starting on treatment, the patient reported resolution of prior dyspnea and pain. Restaging CT scans demonstrated a RECIST partial response (PR) and complete resolution of all brain metastases. This patient has continued on treatment for over 6 months with an ongoing PR., Conclusions: Entrectinib demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity in a patient with NSCLC harboring an SQSTM1-NTRK1 gene rearrangement, indicating that entrectinib may be an effective therapy for tumors with NTRK gene rearrangements, including those with central nervous system metastases.

Infiltration of regulatory T (Treg) cells into many tumor types correlates with poor patient prognoses. However, mechanisms of intratumoral Treg cell function remain to be elucidated. We investigated Treg cell function in a genetically engineered mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma and found that Treg cells suppressed anti-tumor responses in tumor-associated tertiary lymphoid structures (TA-TLSs). TA-TLSs have been described in human lung cancers, but their function remains to be determined. TLSs in this model were spatially associated with >90% of tumors and facilitated interactions between T cells and tumor-antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs). Costimulatory ligand expression by DCs and T cell proliferation rates increased in TA-TLSs upon Treg cell depletion, leading to tumor destruction. Thus, we propose that Treg cells in TA-TLSs can inhibit endogenous immune responses against tumors, and targeting these cells might provide therapeutic benefit for cancer patients., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BH3 mimetics such as ABT-263 induce apoptosis in a subset of cancer models. However, these drugs have shown limited clinical efficacy as single agents in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other solid tumor malignancies, and rational combination strategies remain underexplored. To develop a novel therapeutic approach, we examined the efficacy of ABT-263 across >500 cancer cell lines, including 311 for which we had matched expression data for select genes. We found that high expression of the proapoptotic gene Bcl2-interacting mediator of cell death (BIM) predicts sensitivity to ABT-263. In particular, SCLC cell lines possessed greater BIM transcript levels than most other solid tumors and are among the most sensitive to ABT-263. However, a subset of relatively resistant SCLC cell lines has concomitant high expression of the antiapoptotic myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL-1). Whereas ABT-263 released BIM from complexes with BCL-2 and BCL-XL, high expression of MCL-1 sequestered BIM released from BCL-2 and BCL-XL, thereby abrogating apoptosis. We found that SCLCs were sensitized to ABT-263 via TORC1/2 inhibition, which led to reduced MCL-1 protein levels, thereby facilitating BIM-mediated apoptosis. AZD8055 and ABT-263 together induced marked apoptosis in vitro, as well as tumor regressions in multiple SCLC xenograft models. In a Tp53; Rb1 deletion genetically engineered mouse model of SCLC, the combination of ABT-263 and AZD8055 significantly repressed tumor growth and induced tumor regressions compared with either drug alone. Furthermore, in a SCLC patient-derived xenograft model that was resistant to ABT-263 alone, the addition of AZD8055 induced potent tumor regression. Therefore, addition of a TORC1/2 inhibitor offers a therapeutic strategy to markedly improve ABT-263 activity in SCLC.