Search

BACKGROUND: Household air pollution (HAP) from biomass fuel combustion remains a leading environmental risk factor for morbidity worldwide. OBJECTIVE: Measure the effect of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) interventions on HAP exposures in Puno, Peru. METHODS: We conducted a 1-y randomized controlled trial followed by a 1-y pragmatic crossover trial in 180 women age 25-64 y. During the first year, intervention participants received a free LPG stove, continuous fuel delivery, and regular behavioral messaging, whereas controls continued their biomass cooking practices. During the second year, control participants received a free LPG stove, regular behavioral messaging, and vouchers to obtain LPG tanks from a nearby distributor, whereas fuel distribution stopped for intervention participants. We collected 48-h kitchen area concentrations and personal exposures to fine particulate matter (PM) with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 µm (PM 2.5), black carbon (BC), and carbon monoxide (CO) at baseline and 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-months post randomization. RESULTS. Baseline mean ± standard deviation (SD) PM2.5 (kitchen area concentrations 1,220 ± 1,010 vs. 1,190 ± 880 µg/m³; personal exposure 126 ± 214 vs. 104 ± 100 µg/m³), CO (kitchen 53 ± 49 vs. 50 ± 41 ppm; personal 7 ± 8 vs. 7 ± 8 ppm), and BC (kitchen 180 ± 120 vs. 210 ± 150 µg/m³; personal 19 ± 16 vs. 21 ± 22 µg/m³) were similar between control and intervention participants. Intervention participants had consistently lower mean (± SD) concentrations at the 12-month visit for kitchen (41 ± 59 µg/m³, 3±6 µg/m³, and 8 ± 13 ppm) and personal exposures (26 ± 34 µg/m³, 2±3 µg/m³, and 3 ± 4 ppm) to PM2.5, BC, and CO when compared to controls during the first year. In the second year, we observed comparable HAP reductions among controls after the voucher-based intervention for LPG fuel was implemented (24-month visit PM2.5, BC, and CO kitchen mean concentrations of 34 ± 74 µg/m³,3±5 µg/m³, and 6 ± 6 ppm and personal exposures of 17 ± 15 µg/m³,2±2 µg/m³, and 3 ± 4 ppm, respectively), and average reductions were present among intervention participants even after free fuel distribution stopped (24-month visit PM2.5, BC, and CO kitchen mean concentrations of 561 ± 1,251 µg/m³, 82 ± 124 µg/m³, and 23 ± 28 ppm and personal exposures of 35 ± 38 µg/m³,6±6 µg/m³, and 4 ± 5 ppm, respectively). DISCUSSION: Both home delivery and voucher-based provision of free LPG over a 1-y period, in combination with provision of a free LPG stove and longitudinal behavioral messaging, reduced HAP to levels below 24-h World Health Organization air quality guidelines. Moreover, the effects of the intervention on HAP persisted for a year after fuel delivery stopped. Such strategies could be applied in LPG programs to reduce HAP and potentially improve health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Approximately 40% of people worldwide are exposed to household air pollution (HAP) from the burning of biomass fuels. Previous efforts to document health benefits of HAP mitigation have been stymied by an inability to lower emissions to target levels. Objectives: We sought to determine if a household air pollution intervention with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) improved cardiopulmonary health outcomes in adult women living in a resource-poor setting in Peru. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled field trial in 180 women aged 25-64 years living in rural Puno, Peru. Intervention women received an LPG stove, continuous fuel delivery for 1 year, education, and behavioral messaging, whereas control women were asked to continue their usual cooking practices. We assessed for stove use adherence using temperature loggers installed in both LPG and biomass stoves of intervention households. Measurements and Main Results: We measured blood pressure, peak expiratory flow (PEF), and respiratory symptoms using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire at baseline and at 3-4 visits after randomization. Intervention women used their LPG stove exclusively for 98% of days. We did not find differences in average postrandomization systolic blood pressure (intervention - control 0.7 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -2.1 to 3.4), diastolic blood pressure (0.3 mm Hg; -1.5 to 2.0), prebronchodilator peak expiratory flow/height2 (0.14 L/s/m2; -0.02 to 0.29), postbronchodilator peak expiratory flow/height2 (0.11 L/s/m2; -0.05 to 0.27), or St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score (-1.4; -3.9 to 1.2) over 1 year in intention-to-treat analysis. There were no reported harms related to the intervention. Conclusions: We did not find evidence of a difference in blood pressure, lung function, or respiratory symptoms during the year-long intervention with LPG. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02994680). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Exposure to high concentrations of particulate matter (PM) is associated with a number of adverse health effects. However, it is unclear which aspects of PM are most hazardous, and a better understanding of particle sizes and personal exposure is needed. We characterized particle size distribution (PSD) from biomass‐related pollution and assessed total and regional lung‐deposited doses using multiple‐path deposition modeling. Gravimetric measurements of kitchen and personal PM2.5 (<2.5 µm in size) exposures were collected in 180 households in rural Puno, Peru. Direct‐reading measurements of number concentrations were collected in a subset of 20 kitchens for particles 0.3‐25 µm, and the continuous PSD was derived using a nonlinear least‐squares method. Mean daily PM2.5 kitchen concentration and personal exposure was 1205 ± 942 µg/m3 and 115 ± 167 µg/m3, respectively, and the mean mass concentration consisted of a primary accumulation mode at 0.21 µm and a secondary coarse mode at 3.17 µm. Mean daily lung‐deposited surface area (LDSA) and LDSA during cooking were 1009.6 ± 1469.8 µm2/cm3 and 10,552.5 ± 8261.6 µm2/cm3, respectively. This study presents unique data regarding lung deposition of biomass smoke that could serve as a reference for future studies and provides a novel, more biologically relevant metric for exposure‐response analysis compared to traditional size‐based metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Household air pollution from biomass cookstoves is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality, yet little is known about exposures to nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Objective: To characterize NO2 kitchen area concentrations and personal exposures among women with biomass cookstoves in the Peruvian Andes. Methods: We measured kitchen area NO2 concentrations at high‐temporal resolution in 100 homes in the Peruvian Andes. We assessed personal exposure to NO2 in a subsample of 22 women using passive samplers. Results: Among 97 participants, the geometric mean (GM) highest hourly average NO2 concentration was 723 ppb (geometric standard deviation (GSD) 2.6) and the GM 24‐hour average concentration was 96 ppb (GSD 2.6), 4.4 and 2.9 times greater than WHO indoor hourly (163 ppb) and annual (33 ppb) guidelines, respectively. Compared to the direct‐reading instruments, we found similar kitchen area concentrations with 48‐hour passive sampler measurements (GM 108 ppb, GSD 3.8). Twenty‐seven percent of women had 48‐hour mean personal exposures above WHO annual guidelines (GM 18 ppb, GSD 2.3). In univariate analyses, we found that roof, wall, and floor type, as well as higher SES, was associated with lower 24‐hour kitchen area NO2 concentrations. Practical Implications: Kitchen area concentrations and personal exposures to NO2 from biomass cookstoves in the Peruvian Andes far exceed WHO guidelines. More research is warranted to understand the role of this understudied household air pollutant on morbidity and mortality and to inform cleaner‐cooking interventions for public health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Assessment of personal exposure to PM2.5 is critical for understanding intervention effectiveness and exposure‐response relationships in household air pollution studies. In this pilot study, we compared PM2.5 concentrations obtained from two next‐generation personal exposure monitors (the Enhanced Children MicroPEM or ECM; and the Ultrasonic Personal Air Sampler or UPAS) to those obtained with a traditional Triplex Cyclone and SKC Air Pump (a gravimetric cyclone/pump sampler). We co‐located cyclone/pumps with an ECM and UPAS to obtain 24‐hour kitchen concentrations and personal exposure measurements. We measured Spearmen correlations and evaluated agreement using the Bland‐Altman method. We obtained 215 filters from 72 ECM and 71 UPAS co‐locations. Overall, the ECM and the UPAS had similar correlation (ECM ρ = 0.91 vs UPAS ρ = 0.88) and agreement (ECM mean difference of 121.7 µg/m3 vs UPAS mean difference of 93.9 µg/m3) with overlapping confidence intervals when compared against the cyclone/pump. When adjusted for the limit of detection, agreement between the devices and the cyclone/pump was also similar for all samples (ECM mean difference of 68.8 µg/m3 vs UPAS mean difference of 65.4 µg/m3) and personal exposure samples (ECM mean difference of −3.8 µg/m3 vs UPAS mean difference of −12.9 µg/m3). Both the ECM and UPAS produced comparable measurements when compared against a cyclone/pump setup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]