Search

BackgroundThe benefits of vaccination have been comprehensively proven; however, disparities in coverage persist because of poor health system management, limited resources, and parental knowledge and attitudes. Evidence suggests that health interventions that engage local parties in communication strategies improve vaccination uptake. As mobile technology is widely used to improve health communication, mobile health (mHealth) interventions might be used to increase coverage. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the available literature on the use of mHealth to improve vaccination in low- and middle-income countries with large numbers of unvaccinated children. MethodsIn February 2017, MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as three health organization websites—Communication Initiative Network, TechNet-21, and PATH—were searched to identify mHealth intervention studies on vaccination uptake in 21 countries. ResultsTen peer-reviewed studies and 11 studies from white or gray literature were included. Nine took place in India, three in Pakistan, two each in Malawi and Nigeria, and one each in Bangladesh, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Kenya. Ten peer-reviewed studies and 7 white or gray studies demonstrated improved vaccination uptake after interventions, including appointment reminders, mobile phone apps, and prerecorded messages. ConclusionsAlthough the potential for mHealth interventions to improve vaccination coverage seems clear, the evidence for such interventions is not. The dearth of studies in countries facing the greatest barriers to immunization impedes the prospects for evidence-based policy and practice in these settings.

Objective Design Methods Results Conclusions Opt‐out screening for blood‐borne viruses (BBVs) in emergency departments (EDs) has been established in areas with a high prevalence of HIV diagnoses in England. This multi‐site study explored the attitudes of healthcare workers (HCWs) towards BBV screening in EDs post‐implementation.This was a cross‐sectional electronic survey of HCWs.Between November 2023 and February 2024, HCWs across 33 EDs in England participating in opt‐out BBV screening were invited to complete a survey about the feasibility and acceptability of screening, including the opt‐out consent process. Factors independently associated with acceptability of opt‐out screening were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Free‐text responses were analysed thematically.Responses from 610 HCWs in 19 EDs were provided: 50.4% were nurses, 43.1% doctors, and 6.5% other healthcare professionals. Acceptability of the screening programme and opt‐out consent was high (90.3% and 77.7%, respectively), with some variation between EDs. Acceptability of opt‐out consent was greater among doctors than among other HCWs, and among HCWs who proactively discussed screening further with patients who opted out. However, 50.8% of HCWs felt that patients should be verbally reminded at blood draw, and 44.3% of HCWs wanted more training in discussing opt‐out screening with patients. Free‐text answers suggested changes to test‐ordering systems, including simple integration of tick boxes to document whether patients opted out and to block repeated testing.There was substantial support from ED HCWs for routine opt‐out ED BBV screening, including opt‐out consent. Key areas suggested for improvement included changes to test‐ordering systems and additional training for HCWs. Frequent preference for verbal reminders at the point of blood draw suggests continued HIV testing exceptionalism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Despite improvements in treatment and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) access, 1.3 million people acquired HIV in 2022. Six-monthly lenacapavir PrEP could benefit tens of millions of people at high risk of infection. However, prices are currently up to $44 819 per person per year (pppy). Objectives We projected minimum lenacapavir pricing based on generic mass production and a Cost-Plus (Cost+) model. Methods Current active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and key starting materials (KSMs) costs were obtained from export databases. The routes of synthesis (ROS) were analysed to project a cost of goods (COGs). Formulation, vials and profit margin costs were included using standardized algorithms and Cost+ pricing. We estimated prices with scale-up to supply 1 million then 10 million treatment-years, comparing this with national list prices. Results The lenacapavir API is currently exported from India for $64 480/kg on 1 kg scale. Based on the ROS and KSMs, API COGs of $25 000/kg and $10 000/kg are achievable for a committed demand of 1 million (2 million tonnes/annum of API) and 10 million treatment-years, respectively. Including formulation steps, injectable lenacapavir could be mass produced for approximately $94 pppy for 1 million and $41 for 10 million treatment-years, if voluntary licences are in place and competition between generic suppliers substantially improves. Greater scale-up with improvements in manufacturers' ROS could reduce prices further. Currently lenacapavir costs $25 395–44 819 pppy. Conclusions Lenacapavir could be mass produced for <$100 pppy at launch. Voluntary licensing and multiple suppliers are required to achieve these low prices. This mechanism is already in place for other antiretrovirals. To date, Gilead has not agreed lenacapavir voluntary licences with the Medicines Patent Pool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Weight gain is common after antiretroviral initiation, especially among females, those of black race and lower baseline CD4, although this may potentially be due to lower baseline weight. Use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or efavirenz can suppress weight gain. Methods Data were pooled from the ADVANCE (n  = 1053), NAMSAL (n  = 613) and WHRI001 (n  = 536) trials investigating first-line regimen. Week 96 weight and body mass index (BMI) was stratified by baseline CD4. Multivariable models of weight change and incident obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) were adjusted for baseline CD4, age, sex, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, efavirenz, baseline BMI and trial. Results Participants across all treatment arms experienced weight gain from baseline to week 96, with baseline CD4 count, baseline HIV RNA, tenofovir alafenamide and dolutegravir use, and female sex significant predictors. Mean unadjusted weight change was highest with CD4 < 100 (+8.6 kg; SD = 8.2) and lowest with CD4 ≥ 350 (+3.0 kg; SD = 6.5). This weight gain in CD4 < 100 was highest for participants on tenofovir alafenamide-inclusive treatment, such that absolute weight at week 96 was highest in the CD4 < 100 group. Although not statistically significant, obesity rate (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) in those taking TAF/FTC + DTG with CD4 < 100 overtook that seen in CD4 ≥ 350, despite lower baseline obesity prevalence. The unadjusted findings were corroborated in multivariable longitudinal models. Conclusions Participants with low CD4 may demonstrate significant 'overshoot' weight gain, in addition to 'return to health', with a trend towards increased risk of obesity when initiated on TAF/FTC + DTG. Use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz were associated with smaller weight gains. Effective weight management strategies are needed, especially for individuals with low baseline CD4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In 2023, there were 39.9 million people living with HIV (PLWH) worldwide and 630 000 deaths related to HIV. New strategies are needed, and long-acting antiretrovirals (LAAs) are now widely considered to have great potential to help end the HIV epidemic. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare the safety and efficacy of LAA versus standard oral treatment (SOT) for HIV., Methods: PubMed and Embase databases, supplemented by ClinicalTrials.gov and grey literature, were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting efficacy and/or safety of LAA versus SOT for PLWH until June 2024 were included. Efficacy (HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL) and HIV RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL, adverse events (AEs), treatment discontinuation, CD4 count, metabolic parameters and drug resistance were assessed. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted. The risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.0. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE., Results: Six RCTs were eligible for inclusion, involving 2829 participants. LAA was non-inferior to SOT in suppressing HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL [Risk Difference (RD), -0.00; 95% CI, -0.03-0.02; P = 0.83; I2 = 51%; high quality of evidence (QoE)]. LAA was associated with higher drug resistance (percentage pooled estimate, 57%; 95% CI, 33%-78% versus 9%; 95% CI, 2%-30%; moderate QoE) and risk of grade 1-4 AEs than SOT [Risk Ratio (RR), 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.33; P < 0.001; I2 = 62%; moderate QoE]., Conclusions: LAA has non-inferior efficacy compared to SOT. However, participants receiving LAA were at a higher risk of developing drug resistance, cross-resistance and AEs., (© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Over 80% of people living with HIV in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) take first-line TDF/XTC/DTG (TLD). Due to hard-fought activism, in >100 LMICs TLD now costs under $45pppy under Voluntary License. With final DTG patents expiring by 2029, generic TLD will soon be available globally. We identify seven critical benchmarks underpinning TLDs success which novel ART should now meet, and an eighth for which novel ART should aim. These are superior efficacy; a high genetic barrier to resistance; safety in hepatitis B coinfection; favourable drug-drug interaction profiles including with antimycobacterials; efficacy in HIV-2; safety in pregnancy, long-acting formulation availability and affordable pricing from the outset. We illustrate when generic TLD will become available worldwide and compare this with trial programmes and approval timelines for two case-study novel ART combinations: islatravir/doravirine and cabotegravir/rilpivirine. We demonstrate that currently these regimens and trial programmes will not meet key benchmarks required to compete with TLD., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

As SARS-CoV-2 variants continue to emerge globally, a major challenge for COVID-19 vaccination is the generation of a durable antibody response with cross-neutralizing activity against both current and newly emerging viral variants. Cross-neutralizing activity against major variants of concern (B.1.1.7, P.1 and B.1.351) has been observed following vaccination, albeit at a reduced potency, but whether vaccines based on the Spike glycoprotein of these viral variants will produce a superior cross-neutralizing antibody response has not been fully investigated. Here, we used sera from individuals infected in wave 1 in the UK to study the long-term cross-neutralization up to 10 months post onset of symptoms (POS), as well as sera from individuals infected with the B.1.1.7 variant to compare cross-neutralizing activity profiles. We show that neutralizing antibodies with cross-neutralizing activity can be detected from wave 1 up to 10 months POS. Although neutralization of B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 is lower, the difference in neutralization potency decreases at later timepoints suggesting continued antibody maturation and improved tolerance to Spike mutations. Interestingly, we found that B.1.1.7 infection also generates a cross-neutralizing antibody response, which, although still less potent against B.1.351, can neutralize parental wave 1 virus to a similar degree as B.1.1.7. These findings have implications for the optimization of vaccines that protect against newly emerging viral variants.