Search

Background and Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of 4 non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in Asians with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in real-world practice through a network meta-analysis of observational studies., Methods: We searched multiple comprehensive databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library) for studies published until August 2020. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used for the pooled estimates. Efficacy outcomes included ischemic stroke (IS), stroke/systemic embolism (SSE), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality, and safety outcomes included major bleeding, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The P score was calculated for ranking probabilities. Subgroup analyses were separately performed in accordance with the dosage range of NOACs ("standard-" and "low-dose")., Results: A total of 11, 6, and 8 studies were allocated to the total population, standard-dose group, and low-dose group, respectively. In the total study population, edoxaban ranked the best in terms of IS and ICH prevention and apixaban ranked the best for SSE, major bleeding, and GI bleeding. In the standard-dose regimen, apixaban ranked the best in terms of IS and SSE prevention. For major bleeding, GI bleeding, and ICH, edoxaban ranked the best. In the low-dose regimen, edoxaban ranked the best for IS, SSE, GI bleeding, and ICH prevention. For major bleeding prevention, apixaban ranked best., Conclusions: All 4 NOACs had different efficacy and safety outcomes according to their type and dosage. Apixaban and edoxaban might be relatively better and more well-balanced treatment for Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. J-MJ has received the following: lecture honoraria from Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Otsuka, Dong-A, and Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; and consulting fees from Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: Recommendations for perioperative management of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment in cardiac surgery are lacking. To establish a standardized approach for these patients, we compared hemorrhagic complications and clinical outcomes in patients on DOAC medication, patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and patients without preoperative anticoagulation., Methods: All 3 groups underwent major cardiac surgery and were retrospectively analyzed: patients on DOAC were advised to take their last DOAC dose 4 days before hospital admission, and DOAC plasma levels were measured the day before surgery. In patients with plasma levels of >30 ng/mL, surgery was postponed until plasma level was below this threshold level. Postoperative chest tube drainage, bleeding complications, use of blood products, and thromboembolic events were collected for all groups., Results: A total of 5439 patients no anticoagulation, 239 patients on VKA, and 487 patients on DOAC medication were included between April 2014 and July 2017. Adjusted postoperative chest tube drainage did not differ between the DOAC and VKA groups for the strategy applied in this study (380 mL/12 hours vs 360 mL/12 hours). Moreover, secondary endpoint measures, such as rethoracotomy (30 [6.16%] vs 15 [6.28%]), 30-day-mortality 12 [2.46%] vs 7 [2.93%]), blood-product use, and stroke, were not significantly different through implementation of our standardized study management (P > .05)., Conclusions: Our standardized management for perioperative discontinuation of DOAC therapy may provide a safe approach to minimize hemorrhagic complications in cardiac surgery in patients on DOACs., (Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background The long-term impact of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after coronary artery bypass grafting and the benefit of early-initiated oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with POAF are uncertain. Methods and Results All patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting without preoperative atrial fibrillation in Sweden from 2007 to 2015 were included in a population-based study using data from 4 national registries: SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies), National Patient Registry, Dispensed Drug Registry, and Cause of Death Registry. POAF was defined as any new-onset atrial fibrillation during the first 30 postoperative days. Cox regression models (adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, and medication) were used to assess long-term outcome in patients with and without POAF, and potential associations between early-initiated OAC and outcome. In a cohort of 24 523 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting, POAF occurred in 7368 patients (30.0%), and 1770 (24.0%) of them were prescribed OAC within 30 days after surgery. During follow-up (median 4.5 years, range 0‒9 years), POAF was associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.18 [95% CI, 1.05‒1.32]), any thromboembolism (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral arterial embolism) (aHR 1.16, 1.05‒1.28), heart failure hospitalization (aHR 1.35, 1.21‒1.51), and recurrent atrial fibrillation (aHR 4.16, 3.76‒4.60), but not with all-cause mortality (aHR 1.08, 0.98‒1.18). Early initiation of OAC was not associated with reduced risk of ischemic stroke or any thromboembolism but with increased risk for major bleeding (aHR 1.40, 1.08‒1.82). Conclusions POAF after coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with negative prognostic impact. The role of early OAC therapy remains unclear. Studies aiming at reducing the occurrence of POAF and its consequences are warranted.

Aim: Oral anticoagulants are the first-line drugs for treating thrombotic disorders related to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and for treating deep vein thrombosis, diseases that increase in prevalence with age. Older patients have a greater risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events and are more prone to drug interactions. Given this backdrop, we wanted to determine the factors associated with the prescription of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in older patients., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional observational study using a hospital prescription database. The study population consists of 405 older patients who were given oral anticoagulants. The 2 variables of interest were the prescription of 1 of the 2 classes of oral anticoagulants (direct oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists) and appropriateness of oral anticoagulant prescribing according to Summary of Product Characteristics (potentially inappropriate vs appropriate)., Results: The factors associated with direct oral anticoagulant prescribing were the female gender (odds ratio [OR]: 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-2.88) and initiation during hospital stay (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: [1.52-4.32]). Stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney diseases (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: [0.19-0.79] and OR: 0.07, 95% CI: [0.01-0.53]) were factors favoring vitamin K antagonist prescription. Being 90 years of age or more (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: [1.06-3.98]) was a factor for potentially inappropriate anticoagulant prescribing. The gastroenterology department (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: [1.05-8.11]) was associated with potentially inappropriate anticoagulant prescribing., Conclusions: Direct oral anticoagulants are the drugs of choice for anticoagulant treatment, including in older adults. The female gender and the initiation during hospital stay increased the chances of being prescribed a direct oral anticoagulant in older adults. Stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease increased the likelihood of having a vitamin K antagonist prescribed. Our study also revealed a persistence of potentially inappropriate oral anticoagulant prescriptions in older patients.

Background: Current guidelines consider vitamin K antagonists (VKA) the oral anticoagulant agents of choice in adults with atrial arrhythmias (AA) and moderate or complex forms of congenital heart disease, significant valvular lesions, or bioprosthetic valves, pending safety data on non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Therefore, the international NOTE registry was initiated to assess safety, change in adherence and quality of life (QoL) associated with NOACs in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD)., Methods: An international multicenter prospective study of NOACs in ACHD was established. Follow-up occurred at 6 months and yearly thereafter. Primary endpoints were thromboembolism and major bleeding. Secondary endpoints included minor bleeding, change in therapy adherence (≥80% medication refill rate, ≥6 out of 8 on Morisky-8 questionnaire) and QoL (SF-36 questionnaire)., Results: In total, 530 ACHD patients (mean age 47 SD 15 years; 55% male) with predominantly moderate or complex defects (85%), significant valvular lesions (46%) and/or bioprosthetic valves (11%) using NOACs (rivaroxaban 43%; apixaban 39%; dabigatran 12%; edoxaban 7%) were enrolled. The most common indication was AA (91%). Over a median follow-up of 1.0 [IQR 0.0-2.0] year, thromboembolic event rate was 1.0% [95%CI 0.4-2.0] (n = 6) per year, with 1.1% [95%CI 0.5-2.2] (n = 7) annualized rate of major bleeding and 6.3% [95%CI 4.5-8.5] (n = 37) annualized rate of minor bleeding. Adherence was sufficient during 2 years follow-up in 80-93% of patients. At 1-year follow-up, among the subset of previous VKA-users who completed the survey (n = 33), QoL improved in 6 out of 8 domains (p ≪ 0.05)., Conclusions: Initial results from our worldwide prospective study suggest that NOACs are safe and may be effective for thromboembolic prevention in adults with heterogeneous forms of congenital heart disease., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Many neutralizing agents of anticoagulant effect of factor Xa or thrombin inhibitors (xabans and dabigatran, respectively) have been developed since the commercialization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in 2008. Idarucizumab is a specific antidote of dabigatran commercialised since 2016. An antidote of xabans, andexanet-α, was very recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Other antidotes of DOAC are under pre-clinical or clinical development; the most advanced being the aripazine in addition to γ-thrombine S195A and GDFXa-α 2 M complex. Prothrombin complex concentrates activated or not, are part of the pro-hemostatic agents suggested for DOAC handling in case of haemorrhage or preceeding urgent surgery or invasive procedures. Other pro-hemostatic agents (FXa I16L , FX (a)-C, super FVa) are in pre-clinical stage. The efficacy of these different agents in DOAC reversal and mortality reduction is still controversal in the light of the sparse results of in vitro, ex vivo, pre-clinical and clinical studies.

In 2012, the Dutch Health Council published a report addressing barriers for an early and broad introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The report raised concerns about the lack of an antidote, adherence, lack of monitoring in the case of overdose and the increased budget impact at DOAC introduction. In the past decade, international studies have shown that DOACs can provide healthcare benefits for a large number of patients. This has led to an increase in the prescription of DOACs, as they are an effective and user-friendly alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Unlike VKAs, DOACs do not need monitoring of the international normalized ratio due to more predictable pharmacokinetics. However, the number of prescriptions of DOACs in the Netherlands is still lagging, compared to other European countries. This article highlights the potential health gains in the Netherlands if the use of DOACs were to increase, based on current international experience.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a better risk benefit profile in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether treatment effects could be modified by drug class and dependency on renal elimination of studied agents has not yet been explored., Methods: We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases through November 2016 for phase III randomized controlled trials comparing DOACs with warfarin in patients with AF. Efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled according to drug class and dependency on renal elimination of DOACs and were compared with the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model. Effect differences were assessed with Bucher's indirect comparisons using common estimates, once heterogeneity was low, and with the Bayesian method., Results: Among 6496 Asian patients from 6 trials, both direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors, compared with warfarin, were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding (risk ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.51 [0.33-0.78], 0.74 ([0.58-0.96], 0.60 [0.41-0.86], and 0.59 [0.47-0.76], respectively). There was no between-group difference in direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors or in DOACs with renal elimination less than 50% and 50% or greater (all I 2  < 25% and interaction P > .05). Indirect comparisons within strata of drug class and dependency on renal elimination showed no preferential effect of any given regimen over another. There was no difference in effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality between DOACs stratified by pharmacologic characteristics., Conclusions: DOACs, as a therapeutic class, outperform warfarin in efficacy and safety in Asian patients with AF., (Copyright © 2018 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)