Search

A fixed-dose combination of calcipotriene 0.005%/betamethasone dipropionate 0.064% (Cal/BD) aerosol foam (Enstilar, LEO Pharma) is the only topical therapy approved for the acute (reactive) and proactive management of psoriasis. Although treatment with Cal/BD foam has been characterized in a clinical context, further evidence is needed to determine its optimal use in clinical practice. A group of experts discussed the value of the Cal/BD foam as a topical treatment for mild-to-moderate psoriasis in combination with systemic treatments. The reported experiences support effectiveness of the Cal/BD foam in daily clinical practice, with an improvement in patient quality of life.

Abstract Background Primitive location of melanoma could be a relevant prognostic factor. As regards the scalp, some studies indicate a particularly aggressive biological behaviour for this anatomical localisation. Objectives In this multicentric study, data regarding head–neck melanoma (HNM) have been revised. Methods The design of the study included two main phases. In this retrospective study, data regarding HNM have been collected and analysed. Results In summary, our data suggest that the posterior neck is the area most affected by thicker melanomas. Cheeks and neck melanoma are associated with reduced disease‐free years of life and overall survival compared with all other sites of HNM. Conclusions This study provides useful information in defining the clinical features of HNM, thus improving diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Abstract Background Brodalumab, a fully human anti‐interleukin (IL)‐17 monoclonal antibody that blocks IL‐17RA, is approved in Europe for the treatment of adult patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic treatment. Objectives This study evaluated the achievement and maintenance of therapeutic response for 1 year in psoriasis patients treated with brodalumab in the Italian clinical practice. Methods Real‐world, multicenter, observational, retrospective and prospective study. The retrospective phase ranged from enrolment visit to initiation of brodalumab (12 ± 4 weeks before). The prospective phase ranged from enrolment to a routine follow‐up visit set after 52 ± 4 weeks. Results One hundred eighty‐four patients were eligible and 164 completed the observation period (median 11.9 months; Q1–Q3: 11.4–12.3). At enrolment, the mean duration of disease was 13.9 years (standard deviation; 13.3), 94% of patients (N = 172) had ≥1 clinical manifestation of psoriasis, mainly erythema and itching, and 95.6% had received ≥1 antipsoriatic treatment before brodalumab. Patients who reached an absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score ≤3 at week 12 and maintained it ≤3 through week 52 were 97 (64.7%). At week 12, 72.7% of patients achieved PASI 75, 54.5% PASI 90 and 42.0% PASI 100. At Week 52, 92.9% of patients achieved PASI 75, 84.4% PASI 90 and 61.7% PASI 100. A static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score = 0 was obtained by 55.0% of patients after 12 weeks of brodalumab and by 77.0% after 52 weeks. A Dermatology Life Quality Index ≤1 was reported by 71.9% of patients after 12 weeks and by 89.9% after 52 weeks of treatment. No significant outcome differences were shown among patient subgroups defined by previous antipsoriatic treatments (none, systemic other than biologics or biologic) at either brodalumab initiation or any of the subsequent study visits. Conclusions In this real‐world setting, brodalumab was rapidly effective on skin lesions and quality of life both in biologic‐naïve and biologic‐experienced moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients, with a favourable safety profile.

Filomena Russo,1 Marco Galluzzo,2,3 Luca Stingeni,4 Severino Persechino,5 Leonardo Zichichi,6 Andrea Conti,7 Claudia Giofrè,8 Valentina Dini,9 Martina Vispi,10 Laura Atzori,11 Angelo Cattaneo,12 Aurora Parodi,13 Federico Bardazzi,14 Giuseppe Stinco,15 Paolo Dapavo,16 Giampiero Girolomoni,17 Maria Letizia Musumeci,18 Manuela Papini,19 Marina Venturini,20 Stefano Dastoli,21 Sergio Di Nuzzo,22 Maria Concetta Fargnoli,23 Gianluca Pagnanelli,24 Nicoletta Bernardini,25 Daniele Mario Gambini,26 Piergiorgio Malagoli,27 Carlo Mazzatenta,28 Ketty Peris,29 Iris Zalaudek,30 Gabriella Fabbrocini31 ,† Francesco Loconsole,32 Camilla Vassallo,33 Lucia Pietroleonardo,34 Francesca Prignano,35 Chiara Franchi,36 Anna Maria Offidani,37 Claudio Bonifati,38 Vito Di Lernia,39 Giovanni Gigante,40 Marta Silvia Bartezaghi,40 Matteo Franchi,41,42 Paola Ursoleo,40 Elisabetta Aloisi40 1Dermatology Section, Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Science, University of Siena, S. Maria Alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy; 2Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 3Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 4Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 5Dermatology Unit, NESMOS Department, Faculty of Medicine & Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy; 6Unit of Dermatology, San Antonio Abate Hospital, Trapani, Italy; 7Section of Dermatology, Department of Specialized Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; 8U.O.C. Dermatologia, A.O. Papardo, Messina, Italy; 9Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 10Dermatology Unit, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy; 11Dermatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 12Dermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy; 13Section of Dermatology, DiSSal University of Genoa, Ospedale-Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy; 14Dermatology Division, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 15Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; 16Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 17Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 18Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; 19Dermatology Clinic of Terni, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 20Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; 21Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy; 22Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; 23Section of Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy; 24Department of Dermatology, Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata - IRCCS, Roma, Italy; 25Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Dermatology Unit, “Daniele Innocenzi”, Asl Latina, Italy; 26Dermatology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy; 27Dermatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy; 28Dermatology Unit, Lucca Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy; 29Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy; 30Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 31Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; 32Department of Dermatology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy; 33Institute of Dermatology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 34Dermatology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy; 35Dermatology Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 36Dermatology Unit, IRCCS IO Galeazzi, Milan, Italy; 37Dermatological Clinic, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy; 38Department of Dermatology, Istituto Dermatologico San Gallicano - IRCCS, Roma, Italy; 39Dermatology Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy; 40Novartis Farma SpA, Origgio, Italy; 41National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy; 42Laboratory of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy†Gabriella Fabbrocini passed away on 3 March 2023Correspondence: Filomena Russo, Dermatology Section, Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Science, University of Siena, S. Maria Alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy, Email file.russo@libero.itPurpose: SUPREME, a phase IIIb study conducted in Italy, demonstrated safety and high efficacy of secukinumab for up to 72 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis. SUPREME 2.0 study aimed to provide real-world data on the long-term drug survival and effectiveness of secukinumab beyond 72 weeks.Patients and Methods: SUPREME 2.0 is a retrospective observational chart review study conducted in patients previously enrolled in SUPREME study. After the end of the SUPREME study, eligible patients continued treatment as per clinical practice, and their effectiveness and drug survival data were retrieved from medical charts.Results: Of the 415 patients enrolled in the SUPREME study, 297 were included in SUPREME 2.0; of which, 210 (70.7%) continued secukinumab treatment throughout the 42-month observation period. Patients in the biologic-naïve cohort had higher drug survival than those in the biologic-experienced cohort (74.9% vs 61.7%), while HLA-Cw6–positive and HLA-Cw6–negative patients showed similar drug survival (69.3% and 71.9%). After 42 months, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 was achieved by 79.6% of patients overall; with a similar proportion of biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients achieving PASI90 (79.8% and 79.1%). The mean absolute PASI score reduced from 21.94 to 1.38 in the overall population, 21.90 to 1.24 in biologic-naïve and 22.03 to 1.77 in biologic-experienced patients after 42 months. The decrease in the absolute PASI score was comparable between HLA-Cw6–positive and HLA–Cw6-negative patients. The baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index scores also decreased in the overall patients (10.5 to 2.32) and across all study sub-groups after 42 months. Safety was consistent with the known profile of secukinumab, with no new findings.Conclusion: In this real-world cohort study, secukinumab showed consistently high long-term drug survival and effectiveness with a favourable safety profile.Keywords: psoriasis, secukinumab, real-world evidence, drug survival, SUPREME

Sara Cacciapuoti,* Luca Potestio,* Gianluca Guerrasio, Gabriella Fabbrocini ,† Massimiliano Scalvenzi, Angelo Ruggiero,* Giuseppina Caiazzo,* Matteo Megna* Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy*These authors contributed equally to this work†Professor Gabriella Fabbrocini passed away on 3rd March 2023Correspondence: Angelo Ruggiero, Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, 80131, Italy, Tel +39 - 081 – 7462457, Fax +39 - 081 – 7462442, Email angeloruggiero1993@libero.itBackground: Recent knowledge of psoriasis pathogenesis has led to the development of selective drugs. Among these, brodalumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin (IL)-17A receptor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Biologics may be considered in patients with milder diseases in case of active psoriatic arthritis, severe impact on patient’s quality of life, and involvement of sensitive and difficult-to-treat areas. These skin locations commonly require systemic drugs. Recently, psoriasis severity monitoring has also changed. Indeed, the clinical evaluation by means of specific efficacy scores was combined with serological evaluation by means of the assay of specific inflammatory biomarkers.Methods: An observational study enrolled patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involving difficult-to-treat areas, undergoing treatment with brodalumab to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of brodalumab in patients with psoriasis affecting difficult-to-treat areas (scalp and palmoplantar regions). Secondary outcomes were the assessment of the development of serum markers of inflammation during the treatment period as well as the evaluation of the dermoscopic features of the affected sites to quantify disease activity and response to treatment.Results: Twenty-five patients were included in the study. A statistically significant reduction from baseline in PASI, PSSI, ppPASI and DLQI values as early as week 24 was observed, with further improvement up to week 52. Plasma levels of MMP-3, VEGF-A, and hs-PCR decreased during treatment from week 0 to week 52.Conclusion: Our real-life experience suggests brodalumab as a valuable option for the management of psoriasis located in difficult-to-treat areas. Moreover, our study highlights that the use of brodalumab reduces the plasmatic levels of inflammatory biomarkers (MMP-3, VEGF-A and hs-PCR), showing how the drug modulates the skin inflammatory response by reducing systemic inflammation.Keywords: brodalumab, psoriasis, difficult-to-treat areas, biologic drugs, efficacy

Abstract Introduction Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin malignancy in Caucasians. Globally, about 20% of BCCs involve the periocular region. The treatment of periocular BCC may be very challenging because of its proximity to the intracranial structures. Thus, early diagnosis and early treatment is mandatory. Recently, the introduction of Hedgehog pathway inhibitor therapy revolutionized the management of unresectable BCCs. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcome of sonidegib treatment in patients affected by periocular locally advanced (la) BCC at our skin cancer center. Methods A 3-year retrospective study was carried out enrolling patients with periocular laBCC treated with sonidegib. Therapeutic response was defined as complete remission (CR) in case of complete regression of the tumor, partial remission (PR) in case of tumor regression not achieving complete remission, and stable disease (SD). Results A total 16 patients (11 men and 5 women; medium age 71.6 ± 11.5 years) with periocular laBCCs undergoing treatment with 200 mg/day of sonidegib were included in our study. Patients included in the study were treated for at least 6 months for a median duration of 9 months. Overall, CR was reported in 9/16 (56.2%) patients, PR was reported in 4/16 patients (25%), and tumor remained stable in 3 patients (18.8%). No cases of disease progression were collected. Fourteen out of 16 patients experienced multiple adverse events (AEs): dysgeusia was reported in 12 (75%) patients, muscle spasms in 13 (81%) patients, and 7 (43.7%) patients presented with alopecia. However, all of the AEs were mild and none required treatment discontinuation. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effectiveness and safety of sonidegib in the management of BCC localized at the periocular region. Even if limited, our study suggests this drug as a valuable and safe option in periocular BCC management.

Abstract Background After decades of use, methotrexate displays an established safety and efficacy profile in both in-hospital and outpatient settings. Despite its widespread use, there is surprisingly little clinical evidence to guide daily practice with methotrexate in dermatology. Objectives To provide guidance for clinicians in daily practice for areas in which there is limited guidance. Methods A Delphi consensus exercise on 23 statements was carried out on the use of methotrexate in dermatological routine settings. Results Consensus was reached on statements that cover six main areas: (1) pre-screening exams and monitoring of therapy; (2) dosing and administration in patients naïve to methotrexate; (3) optimal strategy for patients in remission; (4) use of folic acid; (5) safety; and (6) predictors of toxicity and efficacy. Specific recommendations are provided for all 23 statements. Conclusions In order to optimize methotrexate efficacy, it is essential to optimize treatment using appropriate dosages, carrying out a rapid drug-based step-up on a treat-to-target strategy and preferably using the subcutaneous formulation. To manage safety aspects appropriately, it is essential to evaluate patients’ risk factors and carry out proper monitoring during the course of treatment.

Luca Potestio,* Angelo Ruggiero,* Gabriella Fabbrocini, Fabrizio Martora, Matteo Megna Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Luca Potestio, Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy, Tel +39 - 81 -7462457, Fax +39 - 081 - 7462442, Email potestioluca@gmail.comAbstract: Psoriasis management may be challenging, particularly for moderate-to-severe forms of the disease. Indeed, conventional systemic treatments are often avoided for contraindications or the risk of adverse events as well as phototherapy is often limited by logistic concerns. Despite the development of biological drugs and small molecules revolutionized the treatment options showing promising results in terms of safety and effectiveness, some limitations remain. Thus, there is still a need for new therapies that are always welcome in order to tailor the treatment to the patient and to have a higher level of performance, especially in order to maintain long-term effectiveness. In this scenario, deucravacitinib, an oral small molecule which selectively inhibits Tyrosine Kinase 2, may represent a promising weapon in psoriasis management. The aim of our manuscript is to review the current knowledge on the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib for the management of psoriasis.Keywords: deucravacitinib, psoriasis, JAK inhibitors, TYK2 inhibitors

Luca Potestio,* Fabrizio Martora,* Gabriella Fabbrocini, Teresa Battista, Matteo Megna Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Fabrizio Martora, Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy, Tel +39 081 7462457, Fax +39 081 7462442, Email fabriziomartora92@libero.itAbstract: The introduction of biologic drugs revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis, shifting treatment goals to higher treatment outcomes and less frequent safety issues. The outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represented a worldwide challenge, strongly affecting lifestyle, global economy, and overall health. Among the strategies adopted to contain the spreading of the infection, vaccination is the main one. In this context, the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines raised several doubts about their effectiveness and safety in patients undergoing therapy with biological for psoriasis. Even if molecular and cellular mechanisms by which COVID-19 vaccines lead to psoriasis development have not yet been fully elucidated, vaccination itself can trigger the release of interleukin (IL)-6, interferon (IFN) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α by T-helper (Th)1/Th17 cells. All these cytokines are involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. Thus, the aim of this manuscript is to review current literature on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in psoriasis patients undergoing treatment with biologics, in order to clarify any concerns.Keywords: psoriasis, COVID-19 vaccinations, biologic therapies, efficacy, safety

Background Long-term real-life data on secukinumab use in psoriasis are limited. Objectives Determine the long-term effectiveness of secukinumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis in real-life. Methods Multicenter retrospective study analyzing data from adult patients treated with secukinumab for at least 192 weeks and up to 240 weeks in Southern Italy, between 2016 and 2021. Clinical data, including concurrent comorbidities and prior treatments were collected. Effectiveness was assessed by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Body Surface Area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores at the initiation of secukinumab and at weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240. Results Two hundred and seventy-five patients (174 males), mean age 50.80 ± 14.78 years, were included; 29.8% had an uncommon localization, 24.4% psoriatic arthritis, 71.6% comorbidities. PASI, BSA, and DLQI improved significantly from week 4 and continued to improve over time. Between weeks 24 and 240, PASI score was mild (≤10) in 97–100% of patients, 83–93% had mild affected BSA (BSA ≤ 3), and 62–90% reported no effect of psoriasis on their quality of life (DLQI 0–1). Only 2.6% of patients reported adverse events and no patient discontinued the treatment during the study period. Conclusions Secukinumab effectiveness in the long-term treatment of psoriasis is confirmed in real-world.

Background: Dupilumab has been shown to be a safe and effective drug for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in children from 6 months to 11 years in randomized clinical trials. Aim: The aim of this real-life study was to determine the effectiveness in disease control and safety of dupilumab at W52 in moderate-to-severe AD children aged 6-11 years. Methods: All data were collected from 36 Italian dermatological or paediatric referral centres. Dupilumab was administered at label dosage with an induction dose of 300 mg on day 1 (D1), followed by 300 mg on D15 and 300 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W). Treatment effect was determined as overall disease severity, using EASI, P-NRS, S-NRS and c-DLQI at baseline, W16, W24, and W52. Ninety-six AD children diagnosed with moderate-to-severe AD and treated with dupilumab were enrolled. Results: Ninety-one (94.8%) patients completed the 52-week treatment period and were included in the study. A significant improvement in EASI score, P-NRS, S-NRS and c-DLQI was observed from baseline to weeks 16, 24 and 52. Conclusions: Our real-life data seem to confirm dupilumab effectiveness and safety in paediatric patients. Moreover, our experience highlighted that patients achieving clinical improvement at W16 preserved this condition over time.

Thyroid hormones have an important role in fostering tumour progression, however their upstream regulators are less clear. Here, the authors identify the thyroid hormone activating enzyme type 2 deiodinase as a p53 target gene and demonstrate its contribution to tumour progression in p53 mutant squamous cell carcinoma.

Megna Matteo, Teresa Battista,&ast; Matteo Noto,&ast; Vincenzo Picone, Gabriella Fabbrocini, Angelo Ruggiero,&ast; Lucia Genco&ast; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery - Section of Dermatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Angelo Ruggiero, Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, 80131, Italy, Tel +39 - 081 – 7462457, Fax +39 - 081 – 7462442, Email angeloruggiero1993@libero.itBackground: Biologic selection for psoriasis treatment should take into account numerous factors including injection site reactions (ISRs) such as swelling at the injection site, pain, burning, erythema, all possibly reducing patient adherence.Methods: A 6-months observational real life study was performed involving psoriasis patients. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, moderate-to-severe psoriasis diagnosis since at least 1 year, patients being on biologic treatment for psoriasis ≥ 6 months. A 14-item questionnaire was administered to all patients enrolled to assess whether the patient ever experienced ISRs after the injection of the biologic drug.Results: 234 patients were included: 32.5% received an anti-TNF-alpha drug, 9.4% received anti-IL12/23, 32.5% received an anti-IL17, 25.6% received an anti-IL23. 51.2% of study population reported at least one symptom related to ISR. 35.9% of patients experienced pain, 31.6% swelling, 28.2% burning sensation and 17.9% erythema. 3.4% of the surveyed population experienced anxiety or fear of the biologic injection due to ISRs symptoms. The greater incidence of pain was registered in anti-TNF-alpha and anti-IL17 groups (47.4% and 42.1%, p< 0.01). Ixekizumab proved to be the drug with the highest rate of patients experiencing pain (72.2%), burning (77.7%) and swelling (83.3%). No patients reported biologics discontinuation or delay for ISRs symptoms.Conclusion: Our study highlighted that each different class of biologics for psoriasis was linked to ISRs. These events are more frequently reported with anti-TNF-alpha and anti-IL17.Keywords: psoriasis, injection site reactions, biologic therapy

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disease showing a chronic-remitting course. It has been rarely reported that long-term inflammation in HS could lead to serious complications like cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Cemiplimab is a fully human antibody immunotherapy that inhibits programmed cell death protein-1, approved for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma, or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, in patients not eligible for curative surgery or radiotherapy. Herein, we report the case of a 56-year-old patient developing an invasive SCC on longstanding and unresponsive HS lesions successfully treated with cemiplimab.

Luca Potestio, Ilaria Piscitelli, Gabriella Fabbrocini, Fabrizio Martora, Angelo Ruggiero,&ast; Matteo Megna&ast; Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Angelo Ruggiero, Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini, 5, Naples, 80131, Italy, Tel +39 - 81 -7462457, Fax +39 - 81 – 7462442, Email Angeloruggiero1993@libero.itAbstract: The introduction of biologic drugs revolutionized the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis. However, safety concerns still remain, particularly on patient affected by opportunistic infections. In this scenario, the safety of biologic drugs in patient with HBV infection is debated. Globally, screening for hepatitis before starting biological treatment is mandatory as well as a referral to an infectivologist and eventual prophylactic management should be evaluated case by case, also considering risk factors. On the one hand, the use of anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor seems to increase the risk of HBV reactivation, conversely, the use of recently approved classes of biologics [anti-interleukin (IL) 17 and anti-IL23] seems to have a lower risk of HBV reactivation. However, the evidence on the safety of anti-IL23 drugs in patients affected by HBV is scant, particularly for patients undergoing treatment with tildrakizumab. Herein, we report the first case of a female patient affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis and with chronic HBV infection undergoing prophylaxis, successfully treated with tildrakizumab without reporting hepatitis reactivation. Even if limited, our case seems to confirm available evidence about the safety of anti-IL23, particularly tildrakizumab, on patients with chronic HBV infection undergoing prophylaxis.Keywords: psoriasis, HBV infection, biologic therapy, anti-IL23, tildrakizumab

Fabrizio Martora, Matteo Megna,&ast; Teresa Battista,&ast; Luca Potestio,&ast; Maria Carmela Annunziata, Claudio Marasca, Alessia Villani, Gabriella Fabbrocini Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Fabrizio Martora, Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, 80131, Italy, Tel +39 - 081 – 7462457, Fax +39 - 081 – 7462442, Email fabriziomartora92@libero.itAbstract: To date, adalimumab (ADA) is the only biotechnology drug approved for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), an inflammatory skin condition. However, it quickly became apparent that the efficacy of adalimumab in daily practice was highly variable. In our review, we highlighted the current evidence from literature on the use of biologics in HS in a real-life setting, particularly adalimumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab. Data on the effectiveness and safety of biologic drugs in HS management have been analyzed. Even if the results are promising, more studies are needed. In our opinion, the armamentarium of drugs for HS management is increasing, and treatment will be based on a tailored-tail approach, minimizing the risk of adverse events. In this context, we want to point out the reported effectiveness and safety data concerning adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab as well as ixekizumab.Keywords: hidradenitis suppurativa, adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, guselkumab, real life evidence

Abstract Introduction Despite advances in treatment options and the management of patients with psoriasis, considerable unmet needs remain. Our objective was to identify ways to elevate the standard of care for patients with psoriasis by combining the perspectives of three important stakeholders: patients, clinicians and payors, and define ‘Calls to Action’ designed to achieve the identified changes. Methods Eight themes relevant to elevating the standard of care were identified from an insights-gathering questionnaire completed by all three stakeholder groups. A modified Delphi exercise gained consensus on statements informed by the insights. Statements were then used to inspire ‘Calls to Action’ – practical steps that could be taken to realise the desired changes and elevate the standard of care. Results In total, 18 European experts (10 dermatologists, 3 payors and 5 patient representatives) took part in the Delphi process. Consensus was reached on statements relating to all eight themes: improve healthcare systems to better support multidisciplinary team working and digital services, real-world data generation and optimal use, improve patient access, elevate quality-of-life measures as the most important outcomes, involve patients in patient-centred and personalised approaches to care, improve the relevance and reach of guidelines, education, and multistakeholder engagement. ‘Calls to Action’ common to all three stakeholder groups recognised the need to capitalise on the shift to digital healthcare, the need for consistent input into registries to generate real-world evidence to support guideline development, and the necessity of educating patients on the benefits of reporting outcomes to generate real-world data. The enormous quality-of-life burden and psychological impact of psoriasis, as well as the clinical needs of patients must be better understood, including by healthcare commissioners, so that funding priorities are assessed appropriately. Conclusion This unique initiative identified a practical ‘Call-to-Action Framework’ which, if implemented, could help improve the standard of care for patients with psoriasis. Video Abstract (MP4 44777 KB)

Angelo Ruggiero,1 Fabrizio Martora,1 Gabriella Fabbrocini,1 Alessia Villani,1 Claudio Marasca,1 Matteo Megna,1 Luigi Fornaro,1 Rosita Comune,2 Luca Potestio1 1Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; 2Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, ItalyCorrespondence: Angelo Ruggiero, Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini, 5, Naples, 80131, Italy, Tel +39 - 081 - 7462457, Fax +39 - 081 - 7462442, Email Angeloruggiero1993@libero.itAbstract: Teledermatology represented one of the most important and useful tools during the COVID-19 pandemic era. Indeed, due to the severe restriction, and to reduce the spread of the infection, different measures were applied among different countries and hospitals to ensure a continuity of care for patients. In this scenario, teledermatology played a central role, especially in the management of patients suffering from chronic inflammatory skin diseases. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the role of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic to analyze main strengths and limitations of this tool, as well as to provide future perspectives in clinical applications.Keywords: teledermatology, telemedicine, COVID-19, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa

Fabrizio Martora, Teresa Battista, Claudio Marasca, Lucia Genco, Gabriella Fabbrocini, Luca Potestio Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, ItalyCorrespondence: Fabrizio Martora, Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy, Tel +39 - 081- 7462457, Fax +39 - 081 - 7462442, Email fabriziomartora92@libero.itAbstract: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represented a new worldwide challenge, strongly impacting on the global economy, overall health and lifestyle. Since then, several strategies have been adopted to contain the widespread of infection. Among these, vaccination is currently the most important measure to fight against the pandemic. However, several concerns such as slower-than-hoped-for rollout, the hurried approval with limited data, the mechanism of action (in particular mRNA-based), and the uncertain duration of protection they afforded were initially raised. Moreover, even if cutaneous reactions have been rarely reported in clinical trials, global mass vaccination showed several dermatologic reactions not initially recognized, leaving dermatologists to decide how to diagnose and treat them. In this scenario, dermatologists should be ready to promptly recognize these clinical manifestations. Thus, the aim of this manuscript is to review current literature on cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination, particularly inflammatory dermatological diseases, in order to help clinicians to better understand these dermatological conditions and to provide an extensive overview of all the vaccine-related skin manifestations.Keywords: cutaneous reactions, COVID-19 vaccinations, side effects

IntroductionBrodalumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the subunit A of the interleukin-17A receptor (IL17RA), inhibiting the signaling of various isoforms of the IL-17 family. It has been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis after being evaluated in three Phase-3 trials. However, long-term data on brodalumab in a real-life setting are still limited.MethodsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of brodalumab in psoriasis. We also assessed the drug survival of brodalumab in a 3 years timespan. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study on 606 patients followed up at 14 Italian dermatology units, all treated with brodalumab according to Italian guidelines. Patients’ demographics and disease characteristics were retrieved from electronic databases. At baseline and weeks 12, 24, 52, 104 and 156, we evaluated the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score and investigated for adverse events. The proportions of patients reaching 75, 90 and 100% (PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100, respectively) improvement in PASI, compared with baseline, were also recorded.ResultsAt week 12, 63.53% of the patients reached PASI 90 and 49.17% PASI 100. After 3 years of treatment, 65.22% of patients maintained a complete skin clearance, and 91.30% had an absolute PASI of 2 or less. Patients naïve to biological therapies had better clinical responses at weeks 12, 24 and 52. However, after 2 years of treatment, no significant differences were observed. Body mass index did not interfere with the effectiveness of brodalumab throughout the study. No new safety findings were recorded. After 36 months, 85.64% of our patients were still on treatment with brodalumab.ConclusionOur data confirm the effectiveness and the safety of brodalumab in the largest real-life cohort to date, up to 156 weeks.

Introduction: Dysgeusia may occur during conventional or target-therapies and affect patients adherence-to-treatment. Therefore, it should be monitored to improve clinical outcome. To date, available questionnaires on dysgeusia relate to traditional antineoplastics and do not apply to target-therapies as the pathogenetic mechanism and clinical expression differ. Objectives: To develop a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to screen for and monitor the occurrence and severity of dysgeusia in patients under Smoothened (SMO) inhibitors: the SMO-iD questionnaire. Methods: Patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinomas referring dysgeusia under SMO inhibitors at the University Hospital of Naples Federico II, were enrolled between January-December 2020. The PROM was elaborated based on chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia (CiTas) scale (development phase) and then validated by measuring internal consistency and reliability (validation phase). Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and interviewed every 8 weeks. In the first phase, 160 CiTas questionnaires were collected, and the SMO-iD questionnaire was developed. In the second phase, 195 SMO-iD questionnaires were recorded, and reliability and validity assessed. Cronbach alpha was 0.89. Conclusions: The SMO-iD questionnaire is a validated questionnaire that shows high face and content validity as well as high internal consistency and reliability. Hence, it may be introduced in daily clinical setting to monitor dysgeusia in patients under SMO-inhibitors.

Elisa Camela,1 Luca Potestio,1 Angelo Ruggiero,1 Sonia Sofia Ocampo-Garza,2 Gabriella Fabbrocini,1 Matteo Megna1 1Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; 2Dermatology Department, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, University Hospital &die;Dr. José Eleuterio González&die;, Monterrey, Nuevo León, MéxicoCorrespondence: Elisa Camela, Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy, Tel +39 - 081 - 7462457, Fax +39 - 081 - 7462442, Email elisacamela@gmail.comAbstract: Although innovative targeted therapies have positively revolutionized psoriasis treatment shifting treatment goals to complete or almost complete skin clearance, primary or secondary lack of efficacy is still possible. Hence, identifying robust biomarkers that reflect the various clinical psoriasis phenotypes would allow stratify patients in subgroups or endotypes, and tailor treatments according to the characteristics of each individual (precision medicine). To sum up the current progress in personalized medicine for psoriasis, we performed a review on the available evidence on biomarkers predictive of response to psoriasis treatments, with focus on phototherapy and systemic agents. Relevant literature published in English was searched for using the following databases from the last five years up to March 20, 2022: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, EBSCO, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane library. Currently, more evidence exists towards biologicals, as justified by the huge health care costs as compared to phototherapy or conventional systemic drugs. Among them, most of the studies focused on anti-TNF and IL12/23, with still few on IL17 (mainly secukinumab). The most discussed biomarker gene is the HLA-C&ast;02:06 status that has been shown to be associated with psoriasis, and also differential response to biologicals. Although its positivity is associated with great response to MTX, debatable results were retrieved concerning both anti-TNF and IL12/23 while it seems not to affect secukinumab response. Personalized treatment in psoriasis would provide excellent outcome minimizing the risk of side effects. To date, although several candidates were proposed and assessed, the scarcity and heterogeneity of the results do not allow the identification of the gold-standard biomarker per each treatment. Anyway, the creation of a more comprehensive panel would be more reliable for the treatment decision process.Keywords: precision medicine, stratification medicine, biomarkers, pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics, biologicals, small molecules, phototherapy, conventional systemic treatments, apremilast, acitretin, ciclosporin, methotrexate, dimethyl fumarate, MTX, DMF, SM

Angelo Ruggiero, Vincenzo Picone, Fabrizio Martora, Gabriella Fabbrocini, Matteo Megna Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Section of Dermatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, ItalyCorrespondence: Angelo Ruggiero, Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, 80131, Italy, Tel +39 081 7462457, Fax +39 081 7462442, Email angeloruggiero1993@libero.itAbstract: Interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors, guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab, represent the latest class of biologics approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Since their approval numerous real-life studies were published on anti-IL-23 use in routine clinical practice. Indeed, real-life data are important to improve the dermatological decision-making process, including patients who are typically excluded from clinical trials, such as subjects suffering from several comorbidities, subjects on polypharmacy, as well as multifailure patients. Herein, we performed a comprehensive literature review about real-life data available on guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab. Real-life data of anti-IL-23 seem to confirm the promising results of IL-23 shown by clinical trials, highlighting the efficacy and safety profiles of this new class of biologics also in clinical practice.Keywords: guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab, psoriasis, review, real life, real-world practice, real-world evidence

Immune checkpoint inhibitors play an important role in the treatment of malignancies. ICIs consist of monoclonal antibodies directed against inhibitory immune receptors cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), or programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). PD-1 is a receptor expressed by T lymphocytes and has the role of inhibiting their activation. Pembrolizumab is a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. It can improve the immune function of T-cells, which results in significant clinical benefit in the treatment of cancer. Despite its wide use, immunotherapy is associated with a spectrum of side effects known as immune-related adverse events. We present a case of an 82-year-old patient with widespread fibroatrophic skin areas that occurred during a treatment with pembrolizumab for non-small cell lung cancer. Clinical, serological, and histopathological examinations led to the diagnosis of generalized morphea. The patient discontinued pembrolizumab and switched to chemotherapy with pemetrexed and carboplatin. A good therapeutic response was obtained with phototherapy, corticosteroids, and topical calcineurin inhibitors. A focus on the therapeutic management of this skin toxicity in oncological patients is provided.

Matteo Megna, Luigi Fornaro, Luca Potestio, Maria Antonietta Luciano, Mariateresa Nocerino, Mario Delfino, Maria Guarino, Gabriella Fabbrocini, Elisa Camela Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, NA, ItalyCorrespondence: Elisa Camela, Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Naples, NA, 80131, Italy, Tel +39 - 081 – 7462457, Fax +39 - 081 – 7462442, Email elisacamela@gmail.comPurpose: To determine the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETA) biosimilars in elderly and children with psoriasis.Methods: A real-life retrospective observational study was conducted on pediatric (< 18 years) and geriatric (≥ 65 years) psoriasis patients treated with anti-TNF biosimilar agents referring to the Psoriasis Unit of the University of Naples Federico II, Italy, from January 2018 to January 2022. At baseline, demographic characteristics (age and sex), data on psoriasis duration and severity (measured by Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI] and body surface area [BSA]), presence of psoriatic arthritis if applicable, comorbidities, and previous psoriasis treatments were recorded. Patients were monitored by regular follow-ups (week 12, 24, 48 and 72) through clinical and haematological assessments and adverse events (AEs) were registered.Results: A total of 11 children and 23 elderly psoriasis patients were enrolled. Concerning children, 6 (54.5%) were under ADA biosimilar and 5 (45.5%) under ETA biosimilar. ETA and ADA biosimilars were equally effective and safe for up to 72 weeks (mean PASI and BSA < 3). No significant AEs were reported, and none discontinued treatment. In the elderly, 15 (65.2%) were treated with ADA biosimilar and 8 (34.8%) with ETA biosimilar. ETA and ADA biosimilars were equally effective up to 72 weeks (mean PASI < 4 and mean BSA < 5%). AEs (mainly mild) were registered in 9 subjects (39.1%). Also, 4 (17.4%) patients discontinued biologicals for secondary lack of efficacy (3, 75%) or AEs (1, 25%).Conclusion: Our study found that ADA and ETA biosimilars are effective and safe for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in children and the elderly. No statistically significant efficacy and safety differences were found between ADA and ETA biosimilars in both children and the elderly. Geriatric patients displayed a higher discontinuation rate and side effects than the pediatric counterpart even if without approaching statistical significance.Keywords: psoriasis, etanercept, adalimumab, biosimilar, treatment