1. The effect of audible alarms on anaesthesiologists' response times to adverse events in a simulated anaesthesia environment: a randomised trial
- Author
-
M. Erwteman, Christa Boer, Ralf Krage, D. van Groeningen, F. R. de Man, Stephan A. Loer, P.V. Ziedses des Plantes, Anesthesiology, and ICaR - Circulation and metabolism
- Subjects
Male ,Time Factors ,business.industry ,Atrial fibrillation ,Workload ,medicine.disease ,Random order ,Patient Simulation ,ALARM ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Anesthesiology ,Anesthesia ,Clinical Alarms ,Auditory Perception ,Reaction Time ,Medicine ,ST segment ,Humans ,Female ,Patient Safety ,business ,Adverse effect ,Monitoring, Physiologic - Abstract
Summary Alarms are ubiquitous in anaesthetic practice, but their net effect on anaesthesiologists' performance and patient safety is debated. In this study, 27 anaesthesiologists performed two simulation sessions in random order; one session was programmed to include an alarm condition, with a standard, frequent, clearly audible alarm sound. During these sessions, adverse events were simulated and anaesthesiologists' response times to these events were recorded. Perceived workload was assessed with the NASA Task Load Index. Response times to adverse events and perceived workload were similar in both groups. Pooled response times to atrial fibrillation and desaturation were fast, with a median (range [IQR]) of 8 (4–14 [1–41]) s and 9 (6–16 [1–44]) s, respectively. Pooled response times to an ST segment elevation on the ECG and an obstructed intravenous line were significantly slower, with median (IQR[range]) times of 34 (21–76[4–300]) s and 227 (95–399 [2–600]) s, respectively (p
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF