1. Nomogram predicting response after chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using sequential PETCT imaging: A multicentric prospective study with external validation
- Author
-
Andre Dekker, E. Meldolesi, Vincenzo Valentini, Guido Lammering, Johan van Soest, Jeroen Buijsen, Lucia Leccisotti, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Alessandro Giordano, Philippe Lambin, Ruud G.P.M. van Stiphout, Radiotherapie, RS: GROW - Oncology, and RS: GROW - R3 - Innovative Cancer Diagnostics & Therapy
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Tumour response ,Colorectal cancer ,Locally advanced ,Logistic regression ,Multimodal Imaging ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Prospective Studies ,Stage (cooking) ,Rectal cancer ,Prospective study ,Prospective cohort study ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Probability ,Settore MED/36 - DIAGNOSTICA PER IMMAGINI E RADIOTERAPIA ,Aged, 80 and over ,Rectal Neoplasms ,business.industry ,External validation ,Chemoradiotherapy ,Hematology ,Outcome prediction ,Middle Aged ,Nomogram ,medicine.disease ,18F-FDG PET imaging ,Tumor Burden ,3. Good health ,Nomograms ,Oncology ,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,F-18-FDG PET imaging ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business ,Nuclear medicine - Abstract
Purpose To develop and externally validate a predictive model for pathologic complete response (pCR) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on clinical features and early sequential 18 F-FDG PETCT imaging. Materials and methods Prospective data (i.a. THUNDER trial) were used to train ( N =112, MAASTRO Clinic) and validate ( N =78, Universita Cattolica del S. Cuore) the model for pCR (ypT0N0). All patients received long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery. Clinical parameters were age, gender, clinical tumour (cT) stage and clinical nodal (cN) stage. PET parameters were SUV max , SUV mean , metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and maximal tumour diameter, for which response indices between pre-treatment and intermediate scan were calculated. Using multivariate logistic regression, three probability groups for pCR were defined. Results The pCR rates were 21.4% (training) and 23.1% (validation). The selected predictive features for pCR were cT-stage, cN-stage, response index of SUV mean and maximal tumour diameter during treatment. The models' performances (AUC) were 0.78 (training) and 0.70 (validation). The high probability group for pCR resulted in 100% correct predictions for training and 67% for validation. The model is available on the website www.predictcancer.org. Conclusions The developed predictive model for pCR is accurate and externally validated. This model may assist in treatment decisions during CRT to select complete responders for a wait-and-see policy, good responders for extra RT boost and bad responders for additional chemotherapy.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF