Search

Hybrid subtraction angiography can provide a higher percentage of two-view examinations of the carotid bifurcation. Unfortunately, hybrid images are lower in signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) than temporal subtraction angiographic images and are often described as "noisy." The present study was designed to determine if the lower S/N of hybrid subtraction angiography could be restricted to the contralateral carotid bifurcation by "splicing" a small hybrid region of interest into a larger temporal image. Twenty-two selected images were examined on four image quality scales by seven readers. Similarity of reader scoring was characterized by cluster analysis and was good. Ipsilateral carotid arteries were preferred as temporal images, and contralateral carotid arteries were preferred as hybrid images. The splice image was preferred over both. The splice image retained the superiority of temporal subtraction angiography in the region of the ipsilateral carotid artery and incorporated the superiority of hybrid subtraction angiography in the region of the contralateral carotid artery. The splice image incorporated the best features of both image modalities.

Mask mode intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV-DSA) image quality is directly dependent on the arterial time-concentration curve peak and width produced by contrast media. Curves with high peak iodine concentration produce excellent difference images. Curves that are narrow appear and disappear quickly and minimize movement artifacts. Using a noninvasive x-ray technique for quantitative measurement of contrast media time-concentration curve parameters and cardiac output, three experimental data bases were analyzed. From the analyses, equations defining curve peak and width were derived and validated. Width is proportional to central blood volume and inversely proportional to cardiac output. Peak is proportional to the quantity of contrast media injected and inversely proportional to central blood volume. Hypertonic contrast media increases central blood volume and lowers curve peak. Optimal contrast media for IV-DSA is low in concentration and high in volume. In addition, low concentration contrast media may be more comfortable for the patient causing fewer motion artifacts.

Laboratory research has suggested that isotonic contrast media may be optimal for intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV-DSA) by generating taller, narrower time-concentration curves. Clinical investigation of low osmolality contrast media has suggested that less patient discomfort is encountered with low-osmolality contrast media than with standard, high-osmolality agents. In order to directly compare isotonic contrast media with a standard hypertonic contrast media, isotonic ioxaglate (Hexabrix-20) was compared with Renografin-76 in a double-blind prospective clinical trial for IV-DSA examination of the carotid artery bifurcation. Isotonic ioxaglate produced superior contrast medium time-opacification curves and produced superior images across four scales of image quality: anatomic "openness" of the carotid bifurcation, contrast level within the carotid vessels, bone misregistration artifact over the bifurcation, and air (soft tissue) misregistration. The bilateral overall score for isotonic ioxaglate was 1.68 vs. 1.37 for Renografin-76, a 23% superiority. The bulk of the superiority occurred in the contralateral carotid artery. Over the four scales, isotonic ioxaglate was 37% better in image quality of the contralateral carotid artery bifurcation. Since the contralateral carotid artery is very often difficult to visualize during IV-DSA, isotonic ioxaglate represents a significant improvement for this imaging modality.

A hybrid digital subtraction angiography technique and noise-reduction algorithm were used to evaluate the carotid bifurcation. Temporal, hybrid, and reduced-noise hybrid images were obtained in right and left anterior oblique projections, and both single- and multiple-frame images were created with each method. The resulting images were graded on a scale of 1 to 5 by three experienced neuroradiologists. Temporal images were preferred over hybrid images (average score = 3.2 and 2.4, respectively). The percentage of nondiagnostic examinations, as agreed upon by two readers, was higher for temporal alone than temporal + hybrid (4 and 1, respectively). In addition, also by agreement between two readers, temporal + hybrid images significantly increased the number of bifurcations seen in two views (87%) compared to temporal subtraction alone (64%).