Search

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been utilized broadly for brain metastases not only for intact ones but as well as of late for the postoperative cavity of metastases after surgery, due to the advantages of SRS to preserve neurocognitive functions, maintain local control and prescribe the treatment in a short time frame. Randomized trials have proven the safety and efficacy of cavity SRS compared to observation. As WBRT offers no survival advantage in comparison to SRS and frequent monitorization with brain MRIs for early salvage upon failure, there has been a revolution in clinical approach for patients with limited intact brain metastases to treat with SRS only and omit WBRT. Likewise, the postoperative cavity SRS for brain metastases has gained a growing reputation. In this review, we summarize the proof for evidence-based optimization in the postoperative setting of the surgically removed brain metastases.

As a notable cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, brain metastases (BMs) represent the most prevalent intracranial tumors arising in up to 40% of all adult solid tumors during the course of treatment. Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) gained wide appreciation by the radiation oncology communities for the treatment of BM with regards to the grim prognosis of such patients after alternative therapies, including the whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Additional concerns on the neurocognitive deterioration and comparably low tumor control rates offered by the conventional WBRT further quickened the implementation of SRS to the daily practice of radiation oncology clinics. However, the striking diversities among the treatment algorithms and the treatment planning systems of the gamma knife-, linear accelerator- (LINAC), tomotherapy-, robotic Cyberknife-, or the proton therapy-based SRS render the administration of SRS/FSRT challenging. Acknowledging these difficulties, the present review intended to offer a thorough outline of the main principals of the SRS/FSRT technique from the initial patient fixation to the final machine and dose delivery quality assurance treads.

Brain metastases (BMs), the most frequent intracranial tumors, are diagnosed in approximately 30% of all adult patients over the span of planned treatment against a broad spectrum of solid cancers. The prognosis of patients presenting with BM is bleak with an expected median OS of only 4-7 months. However, some particular patients’ groups may enjoy longer survival durations with effective systemic and local therapies. At present, the feasible alternatives for active management of BMs typically include the whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), surgery, definitive SRS, postoperative SRS, systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and their combination variants. Considering the local treatment, the severe neurotoxic effects of WBRT, and the increased risk for radionecrosis and leptomeningeal dissemination after postoperative SRS and together with the ineligibility of certain patients during the postoperative period prompted the energetic quest of alternative treatment strategies for such patients. In this respect, the novel preoperative SRS (PO-SRS) was proposed to provide at least equivalent local control rates with lesser radionecrosis and leptomeningeal dissemination risk. Respecting the scarcity of related literature, the present review aimed to meticulously detail theplausible rationale and accessible evidence for the novel PO-SRS in the management of patients presenting with BMs.

For departments with a congested patient burden or with a limited number of eligible LINACs, we investigated whether LINACS dedicated for SRS-SBRT with limited field high-definition (HD) multi-leaf collimator (MLC) could help to carry this load, and utilized a double-isocenter (DI) optimization with a limited field size of HD-MLC to defeat the craniocaudal field size restriction to match treated plans in a wide-field MLC LINAC for head and neck cancer patients.Fourteen patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers were included, previously treated with simultaneous integrated boost volumetric modulated arc treatment (VMAT) in 33 fractions of clinical target volumes (CTV) of 70Gy, 63Gy, and 57Gy, via single isocenter (SI) plans in Millennium MLC-120 of Varian Trilogy. The DI plans were generated on Pinnacle TPS to be delivered in HD 120 leaves MLC on Varian Truebeam. The organs at risk (OAR) doses and the prescription volume parameters were compared.The DI plans in HD-MLC LINACs were successfully matching the previously treated plans for OAR and CTV constraints. The CI (1.18 versus 1.26; p=0.004) and HI (0.23 versus 0.29; p0.001) were significantly improved with DI, while the MUs (1321.5 versus 800.3; p0.001) and the treatment delivery times (6.1 versus 3.7 min; p0.001) per fraction increased modestly with DI compared to SI, respectively.We revealed that DI optimization plans prepared for HD-MLC could effectively accomplish our goal dosimetrically in locoregionally advanced head and neck cases, despite a modest increase in the MU and treatment delivery times per fraction. This technique may provide an alternative in case of downtimes of standard MLC systems or a standalone treatment machine in case of high volumes requiring extended-field IMRT procedures, or possibly shorten the lengthy waiting times in facilities with limited SRS or SBRT patients.

Representing the most common intracranial tumors brain metastases (BMs) are diagnosed in nearly 30% to 54% of all patients during or after their treatment courses against solid cancers. Although the prognosis of BM patients is extremely poor with an estimated median OS of usually less than 7 months. Nevertheless, nowadays some patients’ groups may experience significantly longer survival durations after the implementation of effective systemic and local therapies, such as surgery and radiotherapy (RT). Currently, the noteworthy alternatives for the management of BMs include the neurosurgery, whole-brain RT (WBRT), definitive SRS, postoperative SRS, systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapy and their various blends. Regarding the local treatment maneuvers, the well-recognized severe neurotoxicity of WBRT and the augmented risk for radionecrosis and leptomeningeal dissemination after postoperative SRS and the ineligibility of certain patients during the postoperative period mandated the search for safer and potentially more effective treatment alternatives for such patients’ group. In this regard, the novel preoperative SRS (PO-SRS) was proposed to provide at least comparable local control rates with lesser radionecrosis and leptomeningeal dissemination risk. The present chapter details the conceivable rationale and available proof for the novel PO-SRS in the management armamentarium of the cancer patients presenting with BMs.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been utilized broadly for brain metastases not only for intact ones but as well as of late for the postoperative cavity of metastases after surgery, due to the advantages of SRS to preserve neurocognitive functions, maintain local control and prescribe the treatment in a short time frame. Randomized trials have proven the safety and efficacy of cavity SRS compared to observation. As WBRT offers no survival advantage in comparison to SRS and frequent monitorization with brain MRIs for early salvage upon failure, there has been a revolution in clinical approach for patients with limited intact brain metastases to treat with SRS only and omit WBRT. The recent implementation of the PO-SRS applications to the treatment algorithm of resected BMs has reputably enhanced the local control at the surgical resection bed in comparison to observation or WBRT Likewise, the postoperative cavity SRS for brain metastases has gained a growing reputation. In this review, we summarize the proof for evidence-based optimization in the postoperative setting of the surgically removed brain metastases.

Purpose: the American Brachytherapy Association is attempting to develop standards for delivering brachytherapy, although differences in practice have been reported in the literature. This study evaluated vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VBT) practice and quality of life-related recommendations among Turkish radiation oncologists. Material and methods: a nationwide web-based 17-item survey was distributed to the members of the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology. These members received e-mail notifications, and a link was posted on the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology internet site to solicit voluntary responses The survey addressed the simulation processes, target volume, prescribed dose, delivery schedules, and recommendations related to vaginal side effects. Results: fifty-seven radiation oncologists responded to the survey. The most used dose fraction schemes for adjuvant VBT were 7 Gy x 3 fractions (30%), 5.5 Gy x 5 fractions (26%), and 6 Gy x 5 fractions (28%). The preferred VBT scheme was 5 Gy x 3 fractions (50%) when the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose was 45 Gy external radiotherapy, while the preferred schemes were 6 Gy x 3 fractions (30%) or 5 Gy x 3 fractions (32%) when the external radiotherapy dose was increased to 50.4 Gy. One-half of the respondents delivered VBT twice a week, and the dose was prescribed to 0.5 cm from vaginal mucosa by 86% of the respondents. There was no common definition for the dose prescription length, which was defined as 3 cm from the vaginal cuff in 33% of responses and as 4 cm in 35% of responses. For serous and clear cell histological types, 38% of the respondents targeted ""full cylinder length"". To prevent vaginal side effects, 78% of the respondents recommended using a vaginal dilator and/or sexual intercourse after VBT. Conclusions: this survey revealed variations in the clinical practice of VBT among Turkish radiation oncologists, which suggests that standardization is necessary., NA

Objective:we surveyed the anxiety, depression, and secondary trauma levels of Turkish Radiation Oncologists related with COVID pandemics. Methods: an anonymous online questionnaire survey was created to evaluate levels of depression, anxiety, and secondary trauma among Turkish Radiation Oncologists. The survey included demographics and occupational status, Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSSS), The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Results: seventy-two respondents provided the power of about 91.4% for the significance level of 0.05. The variance homogeneity was checked by the Levene test, the effect of COVID-19 on psychology is higher in the group of >19 (9.02 +/- 0.820), as well as the effect of social isolation (8.02 +/- 1.622), the STSS scores (34.28 +/- 9.062), the STAIS scores (60.46 +/- 5.296), the STAIT scores (82.21 +/- 9.298), the BDI scores (22.68 +/- 2.788), and the BAI scores (21.04 +/- 9.321). The multiple regressions to estimate BDI revealed statistically significant effects in STAIS, BAI, and STAIT. There is a significant correlation between STSS, STAIS, STAIT, BDI, BAI, the effect of COVID-19 on psychology, and the effect of social isolation. Conclusion: we have established one of the first studies demonstrating the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on depression, anxiety levels, and secondary trauma on a special physician population, the Radiation Oncologists, who specifically do not directly take part in COVID19 management., NA

Background: we retrospectively compared the incidence of isolated elective nodal failure (IENF) and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus involved-field RT (IFRT) by employing the propensity score matching (PSM) methodology in stage IIIB/C inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT). Methods: our PSM examination included 1048 stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients treated with C-CRT from January 2007 to December 2016: a total dose of 66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy and 1-3 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy concurrently. The primary and secondary endpoints were the IENF and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after ENI versus IFRT, respectively. Propensity scores were calculated for each group to adjust for confounding variables and facilitate well-balanced comparability by creating 1: 1 matched study groups. Results: the median follow-up was 26.4 months for the whole study accomplice. The PSM analysis unveiled 1: 1 matched 646 patients for the ENI (N = 323) and IFRT (N = 323) cohorts. Intergroup comparisons discovered that the 5-year isolated ENF incidence rates (3.4% versus 4.3%; P=0.52) and median overall survival (25.2 versus 24.6 months; P=0.69), locoregional progression-free survival (15.3 versus 15.1 months; P=0.52), and progression-free survival (11.7 versus 11.2 months; P=0.57) durations were similar between the ENI and IFRT cohorts, separately. However, acute grade 3-4 leukopenia (P=0.0012), grade 3 nausea-vomiting (P=0.006), esophagitis (P=0.003), pneumonitis (P=0.002), late grade 3-4 esophageal toxicity (P=0.038), and the need for hospitalization (P, NA