1. Epidemiology of motor vehicle accident-associated ocular trauma.
- Author
-
Bhatnagar NV, Uppuluri A, Bhagat N, and Langer PD
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Adolescent, Aged, Young Adult, Child, Registries, United States epidemiology, Retrospective Studies, Sex Distribution, Age Distribution, Child, Preschool, Incidence, Infant, Aged, 80 and over, Accidents, Traffic statistics & numerical data, Eye Injuries epidemiology
- Abstract
Purpose: The objective is to investigate trends in cases of motor vehicle accident-associated (MVA-associated) ocular trauma in which the patient was the driver of the motor vehicle., Methods: The study utilizes data from the 2007-2014 National Trauma Databank (NTDB), a national trauma registry. Status as the driver of the motor vehicle was identified using E-Codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). Trauma diagnoses were identified using D-Codes from the ICD-9-CM. Statistics were performed using IBM SPSS Version 23., Results: We identified 49,660 cases of ocular trauma secondary to an MVA with a 25.3% increase in injuries over the 8-year time period. Men comprised 68.6% (34,057) of cases. Orbital floor fractures (OFFs) were the most commonly observed ocular injury, occurring in 17,647 (35.5%) cases. There were 2,787 cases of open globe injury (OGI) with the highest proportion of cases in the 65 + age group (6.5%). OGIs were seen in 3.0% of cases with OFFs vs. 7.1% in those without. Drivers under 18 were more likely to have optic pathway/cranial nerve injuries (4.4%) and ocular/adnexal contusions (41.2%) than adult drivers. The mortality rate was 4.3% and was highest in the 65 + age group (9.4%)., Conclusion: Men and young adults comprised the majority of cases of MVA-associated ocular trauma. OFFs were seen in approximately one-third of cases of ocular trauma. OGIs were less commonly observed when a concurrent OFF was observed. Though the overall mortality was 4.3%, there was significant variation by age group., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and received exemption by the Rutgers University Institutional Review Board due to non-human determination according to the National Bureau of Economic Research., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF