1. Differentiation of Active Corneal Infections from Healed Scars Using Deep Learning.
- Author
-
Tiwari M, Piech C, Baitemirova M, Prajna NV, Srinivasan M, Lalitha P, Villegas N, Balachandar N, Chua JT, Redd T, Lietman TM, Thrun S, and Lin CC
- Subjects
- Algorithms, Area Under Curve, Cicatrix physiopathology, Corneal Ulcer classification, Corneal Ulcer microbiology, Eye Infections, Bacterial classification, Eye Infections, Bacterial microbiology, Eye Infections, Fungal classification, Eye Infections, Fungal microbiology, False Positive Reactions, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Slit Lamp Microscopy, Cicatrix diagnostic imaging, Corneal Ulcer diagnostic imaging, Deep Learning, Eye Infections, Bacterial diagnostic imaging, Eye Infections, Fungal diagnostic imaging, Photography, Wound Healing physiology
- Abstract
Purpose: To develop and evaluate an automated, portable algorithm to differentiate active corneal ulcers from healed scars using only external photographs., Design: A convolutional neural network was trained and tested using photographs of corneal ulcers and scars., Participants: De-identified photographs of corneal ulcers were obtained from the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT), Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial (MUTT), and Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University., Methods: Photographs of corneal ulcers (n = 1313) and scars (n = 1132) from the SCUT and MUTT were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN). The CNN was tested on 2 different patient populations from eye clinics in India (n = 200) and the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University (n = 101). Accuracy was evaluated against gold standard clinical classifications. Feature importances for the trained model were visualized using gradient-weighted class activation mapping., Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy of the CNN was assessed via F
1 score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to measure the precision-recall trade-off., Results: The CNN correctly classified 115 of 123 active ulcers and 65 of 77 scars in patients with corneal ulcer from India (F1 score, 92.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 88.2%-95.8%]; sensitivity, 93.5% [95% CI, 89.1%-97.9%]; specificity, 84.42% [95% CI, 79.42%-89.42%]; ROC: AUC, 0.9731). The CNN correctly classified 43 of 55 active ulcers and 42 of 46 scars in patients with corneal ulcers from Northern California (F1 score, 84.3% [95% CI, 77.2%-91.4%]; sensitivity, 78.2% [95% CI, 67.3%-89.1%]; specificity, 91.3% [95% CI, 85.8%-96.8%]; ROC: AUC, 0.9474). The CNN visualizations correlated with clinically relevant features such as corneal infiltrate, hypopyon, and conjunctival injection., Conclusions: The CNN classified corneal ulcers and scars with high accuracy and generalized to patient populations outside of its training data. The CNN focused on clinically relevant features when it made a diagnosis. The CNN demonstrated potential as an inexpensive diagnostic approach that may aid triage in communities with limited access to eye care., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF