Search

Mesothelioma is a nearly uniformly fatal tumor. Multimodality therapy including cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy is associated with long-term survival in some patients. Cytoreductive surgery for thoracic disease includes a lung-sparing operation called an "extended pleurectomy/decortication" or a lung-sacrificing surgery called an "extrapleural pneumonectomy." The benefit of cytoreductive surgery for bicavitary disease (chest and abdomen) is poorly understood. Our objective was to evaluate the long-term survivals for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for bicavitary disease and to determine whether any prognostic factors were associated with outcome. We reviewed our Institutional Review Board–approved, institutional, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Mesothelioma Staging Project database. Inclusion criteria were all patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for bicavitary disease. Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier methodology. All International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer database elements were evaluated by univariable analysis. From February 2014 to August 2021, 440 patients with mesothelioma were evaluated. Fourteen patients (3%) underwent cytoreductive surgery of both chest and abdomen as a planned 2-stage operation. Most patients (13/14; 93%) underwent chest surgery before abdomen surgery. For the entire cohort, the median overall survival was 33.6 months with a 5-year survival of 20%. Extended pleurectomy/decortication was associated with a better outcome compared with extrapleural pneumonectomy, with median overall survivals of 58.2 versus 13.5 months, respectively. For a highly selected group of patients with bicavitary mesothelioma, long-term survival can be achieved with an aggressive, staged surgical approach. The patients who undergo extended pleurectomy/decortication with preservation of the lung appear to have more favorable outcomes compared with patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy decortication (PD) are radical operations for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) that remain controversial among thoracic surgeons. There is a lack of randomized evidence to support a survival benefit when major surgical resection is included in multi-modality treatment regimens. Current data from retrospective single institution reviews and prospective trials such as the Surgery for Mesothelioma After Radiation Therapy (SMART) trial are limited by biased patient selection to include only the healthiest patients with most limited disease burden. This patient population predictably has relatively longer survival times than patients with inoperable advanced disease. The only randomized trial to date that has objectively evaluated the true benefit of surgical resection was the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery (MARS) trial which actually showed shorter survival times among patients who underwent EPP compared with those treated medically. Critics of the MARS trial cite a high perioperative mortality rate for driving these results, however a similar trial has never been repeated to refute the MARS trial results. Finally, it is relevant to consider the high mortality and morbidity rates associated with major operations when recommending these interventions to MPM patients. There is a growing body of literature that identifies patients who clearly obtain no benefit from surgery including those with sarcomatoid or biphasic histology, nodal disease, elevated CRP, elevated platelets and advanced age. Surgery in MPM has risks and is of questionable benefit with outcomes data biased by patient selection of those who will have longer overall survival times regardless of treatment.

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive pleural malignancy, and despite all multimodal treatment modalities, the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with MPM is less than 20%. In the present study, we aimed to analyze the surgical and prognostic outcomes of patients with MPM who received multimodal treatment. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, the records of patients who underwent surgery for MPM between January 2010 and December 2020 at our department were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Sixty-four patients were included in the study, of whom 23 (35.9%) were women and 41 (64.1%) were men. Extrapleural pneumonectomy, pleurectomy/decortication, and extended pleurectomy/decortication procedures were performed in 34.4%, 45.3%, and 20.3% of patients, respectively. The median survival of patients was 21 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 20.2%. Advanced tumor stage (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; p=0.04), right-sided extrapleural pneumonectomy (HR, 3.1; p=0.02), lymph node metastasis (HR, 1.8; p=0.04), and incomplete multimodal therapy (HR, 1.9; p=0.03) were poor prognostic factors. There was no significant survival difference according to surgical type or histopathological subtype. Conclusion: Multimodal therapy can offer an acceptable survival rate in patients with MPM. Despite its poor reputation in the literature, the survival rate after extrapleural pneumonectomy, especially left-sided, was not as poor as might be expected.

Objective: We reviewed the available literature on patients with MPM undergoing either extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). Methods: Original research studies that evaluated long-term outcomes of P/D versus EPP were identified, from January 1980 to February 2022. The 30-days and 90-day mortality, along with the 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-year survival, the median overall survival, the macroscopic complete resection (MCR) rate, and the complications were calculated according to both a fixed and a random effect model. The Q and I2 statistic were used to test for heterogeneity among the studies. Sensitivity analysis was performed including only studies that incorporated the MCR concept. Results: Eighteen studies were included, incorporating a total of 4,852 patients treated with EPP and P/D. The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the EPP group (OR: 2.79 [95% CI 1.30, 6.01]; p = 0.009). The median overall survival was higher in the P/D group (WMD:-4.55 [-6.05, -3.04]; p < 0.001). No differences were found regarding the 90-day mortality, MCR rate, and the 1-, 2-,3-, 5-year survival between the EPP and P/D groups. These findings were validated by the sensitivity analysis. The incidence of atrial fibrillation, hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, air leak, and reoperation was significantly increased in the EPP group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The present meta-analysis indicates that P/D is associated with enhanced outcomes regarding 30-day mortality, median overall survival, and complications. The P/D approach should be preferred when technically feasible. However, the procedure of choice should be decided based on the goal of MCR in the safest approach for the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mesothelioma has a scant prognosis and a great impact on symptoms and the quality of life. Pleurectomy/decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy are the two cytoreductive surgical strategies, with different invasiveness, but achieving similar oncological results. Hereafter, the two surgical procedures effects on symptoms and the quality of life are compared in a high symptom-burden population. Between 2003 and 2017, 55 consecutive patients underwent pleurectomy/decortication (n = 26) or extrapleural pneumonectomy (n = 29), both followed by adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Cardio-pulmonary function, symptoms and the quality of life (Short-Form-36 and St.George's questionnaires) were evaluated pre- and 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months postoperatively. Extrapleural pneumonectomy demonstrated lower pain at 12 months but a higher decrement of forced vital capacity at 24 months than pleurectomy/decortication. Both procedures revealed a 3-months improvement of many symptoms and the quality of life determinants. Improvement in physical, social and pain-related measured parameters lasted for a longer time-spawn in the extrapleural pneumonectomy group. No differences were found in chemotherapy compliance and survival between groups. Age-at-presentation (p = 0.02) and non-epitheliod histology (p = 0.10) were the only significant prognosticators. Surgery, despite poor survival results, improved symptoms and the quality of life in patients with mesothelioma with high symptom-burden at diagnosis. Therefore, extrapleural pneumonectomy demonstrated the most durable effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Both extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) are used for the surgical treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This study aimed to compare the operative and clinical outcomes and survival between EPP and P/D. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the surgical and clinical data of 40 patients who underwent either EPP (n = 18) or P/D (n = 22) for MPM at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. Results: In comparison to EPP, P/D was associated with a higher intraoperative bleeding volume (1175 vs 1805 ml, p = 0.0020) and greater duration of postoperative thoracic drainage (3 vs 16 days, p < 0.0001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more common after P/D (81.8%) than after EPP (33.3%; p = 0.0024). For epithelioid-type MPM, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly better in patients who underwent P/D in comparison to those who underwent EPP (p = 0.040 and p = 0.015, respectively), with no difference for the biphasic and sarcomatoid types of MPM. A Cox proportional hazards regression model identified P/D as a significant favorable prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.391; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.175–0.871; p = 0.022] and RFS (HR, 0.418; 95% CI, 0.190–0.920; p = 0.030). Conclusions: Based on our findings, P/D may be superior to EPP for improving the prognosis of patients with resectable epithelioid-type MPM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer collaborated with the International Mesothelioma Interest Group to propose the first TNM stage classification system for diffuse pleural mesothelioma in 1995, accepted by the Union for International Cancer Control and the American Joint Committee on Cancer for the sixth and seventh edition stage classification manuals. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee Mesothelioma Domain developed and analyzed an international registry of patients with pleural mesothelioma and updated TNM descriptors for the eighth edition of the stage classification system. To inform revisions for the forthcoming ninth edition of the TNM stage classification system, data submission was solicited for patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2022 with expanded data elements on the basis of the first project's exploratory analyses, including pleural thickness measurements, updated surgical nomenclature, and molecular markers. The resulting database consisted of a total of 3598 analyzable cases from Europe, Australia, Asia, North America, and South America, with a median age of 71 years (range: 18-99 y), 2775 (77.1%) of whom were men. With only 1310 patients (36.4%) undergoing curative-intent operations, this iteration of the database includes far more patients treated nonsurgically compared with prior. Four separate manuscripts on T, N, M, and stage groupings submitted to this journal will summarize analyses of these data and will serve collectively as the primary source of the proposed changes to the upcoming ninth edition of the pleural mesothelioma stage classification system., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Hasegawa received an endowed course from Kubota Corporation. Dr. Opitz has relationships with Roche (institutional grant and speakers bureau), AstraZeneca (advisory board and speakers bureau), Merck Sharp & Dohme (advisory board), Bristol-Myers Squibb (advisory board), Medtronic (institutional grant), and Intuitive (proctorship). Dr. Pass has relationships with Roche (steering committee and speakers bureau) and AstraZeneca (advisory board). Dr. Ripley receives institutional clinical trial funding from AstraZeneca and serves on the speakers bureau of Merck. Dr. Rusch receives institutional clinical trial funding from Genentech; receives meeting prep and travel reimbursement from NIH/NCI Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee; is an unpaid member of DSMC Committee and MARS II Trial (Cancer Research UK). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The presentation of the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing pleurectomy/decortication to no surgery, injected new data into the contentious discussion surrounding the use of surgery in the management of diffuse pleural mesothelioma. We review the trial results in the context of the existing work surrounding the use of surgery in pleural mesothelioma., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Copyright of Studia Pneumologica et Phthiseologica is the property of TRIOS, spol. sr.o. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

A 69-year-old man with occupational exposure to asbestos was referred to our hospital with right diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. He underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy with reconstruction of the pericardium and diaphragm using elongated polytetrafluoroethylene patches, followed by postoperative chemotherapy and chest wall irradiation. One year later, he was hospitalized because of a right empyema caused by Escherichia coli infection. As chest drainage and systemic antibiotics did not eliminate the abscess around the artificial patches, a Clagett window was created. To avoid mediastinal and liver overshift into the right thoracic cavity, we only performed partial resection of the diaphragm patch and incision of the artificial pericardium. After 19 days of irrigation and dressing change, the artificial patches were completely removed. Two months later, the patient provided a culture-negative sample and had an improved nutritional status; we therefore performed closure of the Clagett window with thoracoplasty. He did not experience recurrence of empyema. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pediatric sarcomas are rare entities. Bone sarcomas and rhabdomyosarcoma are most common, whereas primary sarcoma of the lung is extremely uncommon. Pneumonectomy is only very infrequently performed in the pediatric population. We report on a 16-year-old girl with an undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma of the left lung. There was no comorbidity and no history of previous malignant disease. The huge tumor originated from the left lower lobe and had spread to the left pleura. As part of a multimodal approach, she underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy with en bloc resection of the pleura, lung, pericardium, and diaphragm.

Introduction: Macroscopic complete resection (MCR) within a multimodality treatment concept offers currently the best survival for malignant pleural mesothelioma patients. The current standardised therapy is within a multimodality approach including (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy followed by macroscopic complete resection (MCR). However, MCR in form of extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or extended pleurectomy/decortication ((E)PD) is correlated with significant morbidity and mortality if not performed in high volume centres as described previously according to the literature. In addition, there exist no standardised anaesthesiological protocol for this surgical approach according to the literature. Methods: At our institution, diagnosed mesothelioma patients up to an International Mesothelioma Interest Group (IMIG) stage III receive induction chemotherapy followed by either EPP or (E)PD and in certain cases additional adjuvant therapy. In the period 1999-end 2019, 362 patients were intended to be treated and 303 underwent induction chemotherapy followed by MCR. MCR can be achieved either by EPP or (E)PD. Both procedures request a good teamwork between the surgeon and the anaesthesiologist. Conclusion: Although, there has been a shift lately from EPP towards lung sparing procedure (E)PD, both surgical approaches are still performed to date and is a challenging procedure for both, the surgeon as well as the anaesthesiologist. Herewith, we present our institutional perioperative standard operating procedures for the surgical and anaesthesiological management of EPP or (E)PD according to international terms of reference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This case report characterizes the physiological responses to incremental cycling and determines the effects of 12 wk of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on respiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity, and dyspnea in a physically active 59-yr-old female, 4 years after a left-sided extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). On separate days, a symptom-limited incremental exercise test and a constant work rate (CWR) test at 75% of peak work rate (WR) were completed, followed by 12 wk of IMT and another CWR test. IMT consisted of two sessions of 30 repetitions twice daily for 5 days per week. Physiological and perceptual variables were measured throughout each exercise test. The participant had a total lung capacity that was 43% predicted post-EPP. A rapid and shallow breathing pattern was adopted throughout exercise, and the ratio of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide output was elevated for a given work rate. Oxygen uptake was 71% predicted and WR was 88% predicted. Following IMT, maximal inspiratory pressure improved by 36% (-27.1 cmH2O) and endurance time by 31 s, with no observable changes in any submaximal or peak cardiorespiratory variables during exercise. The intensity and unpleasantness of dyspnea increased by 2 and 3 Borg 0-10 units, respectively, at the highest equivalent submaximal exercise time achieved on both tests. Despite having undergone a significant reduction in lung volume post-EPP, the participant achieved a relatively normal peak incremental WR, which may reflect a high level of physical conditioning. This case report also demonstrates that IMT can effectively increase respiratory muscle strength several years following EPP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mesothelioma has a scant prognosis and a great impact on symptoms and the quality of life. Pleurectomy/decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy are the two cytoreductive surgical strategies, with different invasiveness, but achieving similar oncological results. Hereafter, the two surgical procedures effects on symptoms and the quality of life are compared in a high symptom-burden population. Between 2003 and 2017, 55 consecutive patients underwent pleurectomy/decortication (n = 26) or extrapleural pneumonectomy (n = 29), both followed by adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Cardio-pulmonary function, symptoms and the quality of life (Short-Form-36 and St.George’s questionnaires) were evaluated pre- and 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months postoperatively. Extrapleural pneumonectomy demonstrated lower pain at 12 months but a higher decrement of forced vital capacity at 24 months than pleurectomy/decortication. Both procedures revealed a 3-months improvement of many symptoms and the quality of life determinants. Improvement in physical, social and pain-related measured parameters lasted for a longer time-spawn in the extrapleural pneumonectomy group. No differences were found in chemotherapy compliance and survival between groups. Age-at-presentation (p = 0.02) and non-epitheliod histology (p = 0.10) were the only significant prognosticators. Surgery, despite poor survival results, improved symptoms and the quality of life in patients with mesothelioma with high symptom-burden at diagnosis. Therefore, extrapleural pneumonectomy demonstrated the most durable effects.

Introduction Surgery for postchemotherapy residual nonseminomatous germ cell tumors may be difficult due to exceptional lesion size and location. Case presentation A 47‐year‐old man presented with swelling and pain in the left scrotum. Computed tomography revealed a solid occupied lesion in the left scrotum with huge metastases in the left lung and pleura. Results of a left high inguinal orchiectomy indicated a pathological diagnosis of germ cell tumors of several histological types. The patient declined postoperative chemotherapy but returned to our department 10 months later with dyspnea. Serum tumor marker levels were restored to normal range by adjuvant chemotherapy. Thereafter, an extrapleural pneumonectomy was performed for the remaining tumors. He has since been asymptomatic without recurrence or dyspnea for over 5 years. Conclusion Extrapleural pneumonectomy is a valid treatment option for the management of huge pleural and pulmonary metastases of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.

In recent years, there has been a shift from extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) toward pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) as the preferred surgical technique. However, we occasionally encounter difficult cases wherein visceral pleurectomy requires conversion to EPP from P/D. We sought to clarify the preoperative risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with conversion to EPP. We compared and analyzed conversion to EPP and P/D between September 2012 and December 2019. Conversion to EPP was decided in case of diffuse tumor invasion to the pulmonary parenchyma or due to failure of decortication. Univariable regression analysis was performed to determine the association of preoperative variables with conversion to EPP. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Of the 181 patients who underwent intended P/D, 145 (80.1%) patients underwent P/D and 18 (9.9%) patients underwent conversion to EPP. The sum of 3-level pleural thickness (P < 0.001), maximum of 3-level pleural thickness (P = 0.006), and clinical T stage (P < 0.001) demonstrated association with conversion to EPP. Overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly worse in the conversion to EPP group (median overall survival, 29.2 months vs 57.0 months [P = 0.008]; median progression-free survival, 15.3 months vs 23.2 months [P = 0.005]. Our data show that approximately 1 of every 10 patients with P/D intention converted to EPP. Preoperative pleural thickness and clinical T stage may be risk factors associated with conversion to EPP. The survival rate of conversion to EPP was worse than that of P/D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: to date, no consensus has been reached on the surgical gold-standard in pleural mesothelioma (PM). We retrospectively reviewed our experience as a tertiary referral centre, to compare short- and long-term survival of PM patients undergoing different types of surgery., Methods: in retrospective, observational, single-centre study, we analysed all the patients histologically diagnosed with PM undergoing surgical procedures with palliative or curative intent at IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan, Italy, from January 2003 to December 2020. The primary study endpoint was 10-year overall survival (OS) in three different types of resections: extra-pleural-pneumonectomy (EPP), pleurectomy/decortication (P/D), partial-pleurectomy/pleural-biopsy (PP/B). Secondary endpoints were postoperative hospital stay and postoperative 30-day and 90-day mortality rates. The survival function was estimated using Kaplan-Meier, and the Log-rank test was used for testing differences. Univariable and Multivariable Cox regression models were implemented to estimate Hazard Ratio (HR) for all variables of interest., Results: 243 consecutive patients were enrolled, EPP was performed in 49 (20.2%), P/D in 58 (23.8%), PP/B in 136 (56.0%) patients. The median follow-up time was 19.8 months. 10-year OS was significantly better for P/D group (16%, Log-Rank test p<0.0001) compared to PP/B (1.8%) and EPP (0%). No statistically significant differences were found among the 3 surgical groups in 30- and 90-day mortality rates. At multivariable analysis, gender (male, HR=1.58), type of resection (P/D, HR=0.55) and surgery date (recent years, HR=0.61) were found to be independent prognostic factors for OS., Conclusions: in PM, lung-sparing curative approach (e.g. P/D) should be preferred in highly selected patients and in highly experienced centres, whenever appropriate. Anyway, when P/D is not indicated, adopting palliative/conservative management (e.g. PP/B) could ensure comparable results as extremely aggressive surgeries (e.g. EPP). The aim of surgery in PM should not be reaching complete resection, but rather accomplishing significant resection allowing to complete the multimodality treatment in highly selected patients in experienced centers., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The optimal treatment sequence for localized malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is controversial. We aimed to assess outcomes and toxicities of treating localized MPM with neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP).Methods: Patients were enrolled on an institutional protocol of surgery for mesothelioma after radiation therapy (SMART) between June 2016 and May 2017. Eligible patients were adults with MPM localized to the ipsilateral pleura. Patients underwent staging with PET/CT, pleuroscopy, bronchoscopy/EBUS, mediastinoscopy, and laparoscopy. Five fractions of RT were delivered using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), with 30 Gy delivered to gross disease and 25 Gy to the entire pleura. EPP was performed 4–10 days following completion of RT.Results: Five patients were treated on protocol. Median age was 62 years (range 36–66). Histology was epithelioid on initial biopsy in all patients, but one was found to have biphasic histology after surgery. Three patients had surgeon-assessed gross total resection, and two had gross residual disease. While all patients were clinically node negative by pretreatment staging, three had positive nodal disease at surgery. Patients were hospitalized for a median 24 days (range 5–69) following surgery. Two patients developed empyema, one of whom developed respiratory failure and subsequently renal failure requiring dialysis, while the other required multiple surgical debridements. Two patients developed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response after surgery, one of whom developed acute respiratory distress requiring intubation and tracheostomy. At last follow-up, one patient died at 1.4 years after local and distant progression, two were alive with local and distant progression, and the remaining two were alive without evidence of disease at 0.1 and 2.7 years. Median time to progression was 9 months. Three patients received salvage chemotherapy.Conclusions: SMART provided promising oncologic outcomes at the cost of significant treatment related morbidity. Due to the significant treatment associated morbidity and favorable treatment alternatives, we have not broadly adopted SMART at our institution.

Abstract Background Cardiac herniation is a serious postoperative complication of extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and is reportedly preventable by reducing the suction pressure of the chest drain. Case presentation We describe a patient in whom respiratory failure, which was caused by impending tension pneumothorax after EPP, was successfully treated via normal suction pressure of the chest drain. A lower suction pressure (− 7 cmH2O) was chosen as an alternative to the setting typically used for postoperative drainage (− 15 cmH2O). As a result, the wound in the chest wall functioned as an antireflux check valve, leading to the development of impending tension pneumothorax. Conclusions Impending tension pneumothorax presents with an abnormal elevation of intrapleural pressure on the affected side. This phenomenon can be effectively treated by increasing the suction pressure in the chest drain.

Heterologous mesothelioma is a very rare subtype of sarcomatoid mesothelioma characterized by the presence of malignant heterologous elements. A 69-year-old man with a strong history of asbestos exposure presented with a 5-cm mass in his chest wall, destroying the right 5th rib and spreading along the parietal pleura, on a CT. Biopsy revealed heterologous mesothelioma with osteosarcomatous elements, following which left extrapleural pneumonectomy was performed with combined resection of pericardium, hemidiaphragm, and 4th, 5th, and 6th costal segments. A small cytokeratin-positive epithelioid component in the resected tumor definitively confirmed the diagnosis. Post-operative chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy were undertaken. After 12-month disease-free period post treatment, rapid intraperitoneal recurrence resulted in death. Autopsy revealed no tumors in the left thorax. We present here a case of heterologous osteosarcomatous pleural mesothelioma that followed a unique clinical course after trimodality therapy. In addition, literature of 54 cases of the similar heterologous mesothelioma was reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We herein report the case of a 62-year-old man who underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) for pleural epithelial hemangioendothelioma (EHE) diagnosed by a pleural biopsy. Pre-operative computed tomography revealed diffuse pleural thickening and pleural effusion in the right thoracic cavity, although metastasis to neither the lymph nodes nor distant organs was detected. We decided to perform EPP based on surgical findings that the tumor had invaded the lung parenchyma. A pathological examination revealed tumor invasion of the lung parenchyma, blood vessel, pericardium, diaphragm and bronchial wall. Despite aggressive treatment, tumor recurrence was detected about 1 month after surgery. Although we controlled the tumor progression using pazopanib, the patient ultimately died 3.5 months after the operation. Pleural EHE is a very rare disease that has a poor prognosis due to its high malignant potential. It is important to formulate strategies matched to individual cases based on disease progression and invasiveness of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The classification of diffuse malignant mesothelioma into epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid types is based on histologic patterns. The diagnosis is made on biopsies, and because of intratumoral heterogeneity, they may not be representative of the entire tumor. The number and volume of biopsies needed to reach diagnostic accuracy in diffuse malignant mesothelioma and their prognostic value remain unclear.Methods: This study examined 759 consecutive patients with pleural diffuse malignant mesothelioma treated by pleurectomy/decortication or extrapleural pneumonectomy for the presence of epithelioid and/or sarcomatoid histology and classified both the presurgery biopsies (core-needle or thoracoscopic) and surgical resection specimens. The number and volume of biopsies were correlated with pre- and postsurgery histologies and overall survival.Results: Diffuse malignant mesothelioma was classified as epithelioid (76%), biphasic (18%), sarcomatoid (5%), or indeterminate (1%) in biopsies and as epithelioid (64%), biphasic (32%), and sarcomatoid (4%) in surgical resection specimens (overall concordance, 80.6%). The positive likelihood ratios were 2.4, 13.6, and 90.1 for biopsies with epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid histologies, respectively. Concordant histologies between biopsies and resections were associated with a higher number of biopsies (median tissue blocks for concordant histologies vs discordant histologies, 3 vs 2; P < .002) but were less associated with a higher volume (median, 1.2 vs 1.1 cm3 ; P = .06). In a multivariate analysis, overall survival was independently predicted by histology in the resection specimen (P < .0001) but not in the biopsy (P = .09).Conclusions: In contrast to epithelioid histology, sarcomatoid histology in biopsies is highly accurate. Despite intratumoral heterogeneity, the accuracy of histologic classification increases with the number of tissue blocks examined, emphasizing the diagnostic value of extensive sampling by presurgery biopsies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed an international pleural mesothelioma database to improve staging. Data entered from 1995 to 2009 (training data set) were analyzed previously to evaluate supplemental prognostic factors. We evaluated these factors with new clinical data to determine whether the previous models could be improved., Methods: Patients entered into the database from 2009 to 2019 (validation cohort) were assessed for the association between previous prognosticators and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression with bidirectional stepwise selection. Additional variables were analyzed and models were compared using Harrell's C-index., Results: The training data set included 3101 patients and the validation cohort, 1733 patients. For the multivariable pathologic staging model applied to the training cohort, C-index was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.656-0.705). For the validation data set (n = 497), C-index was 0.650 (95% CI: 0.614-0.685), and pathologic stage, histologic diagnosis, sex, adjuvant therapy, and platelet count were independently associated with survival. Adding anemia to the model increased the C-index to 0.652 (95% CI: 0.618-0.686). A basic presentation model including all parameters before staging yielded a C-index of 0.668 (95% CI: 0.641-0.695). In comparison, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer model yielded C-indices of 0.550 (95% CI: 0.511-0.589) and 0.577 (95% CI: 0.550-0.604) for pathologic staging and presentation models, respectively., Conclusions: Although significant predictors differed slightly, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer training model performed well in the validation set and better than the model of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. International collaboration is critical to improve outcomes in this rare disease., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study examined the effect of metastatic mediastinal lymph node involvement on the prognosis of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) who underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or extended pleurectomy (E/P) and also to assess the effect of metastatic mediastinal lymph node involvement on the prognosis of patients with MPM in these group of patients., Methods: This retrospective study included 84 patients with MPM (66 men [78.6%] and 18 women [21.4%]) who underwent EPP ( n  = 44) or E/P ( n  = 40) at our institution between January 2001 and July 2019. Survival analyses were performed according to histopathology, nodal status, and surgical approach., Results: In the EPP group, patients with T2-N2 status had a significantly better mean survival (17 ± 2.1 months) than patients with T3-N2 (7.3 ± 1.6 months) or T4-N2 (3.2 ± 1.1 months) status ( p  = .001). In the E/P group, patients with T2-N2 status had a mean survival of 18 ± 1.1 months, while patients with T3-N2 and T4-N2 status had mean survival durations of 6.6 ± 1.6 and 4.8 ± 1.2 months, respectively ( p  = .159). In both treatment groups, the survival rates of patients with epithelial tumors were better than those of patients with non-epithelial tumors, independent of N status. None of the patients with N2 disease survived until 5 years postoperatively., Conclusion: In summary, our results suggested that mediastinal lymph node metastasis negatively influenced the prognosis of patients with T3 MPM, regardless of treatment by EPP or E/P. Under these circumstances, preoperative cervical mediastinoscopy or endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration may be considered for patients with high-stage MPM who are scheduled for surgery with curative intent. In our study, N2 status was spotted as a significant factor affecting survival, nevertheless its significance in survival of pleural mesothelioma patients should be analyzed in multi-centered studies.

Surgery is a mainstay of treatment allowing for debulking of tumor and expansion of the lung for improvement in median survival and quality of life for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Although optimal surgical technique remains open for debate—extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) vs. pleurectomy/decortication (P/D)—minimally invasive surgery (VATS-P/D) remains underutilized in the management of MPM. We examined whether VATS-P/D is a feasible alternative to EPP and P/D. We evaluated the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) from 2007–2017 to assess the short-term complications of EPP vs. P/D, including a subanalysis of open P/D vs. VATS-P/D. There were 331 patients with open surgery; 269 with P/D and 62 with EPP. There were 384 patients with P/D; 269 were open and 115 VATS. Rates of any complication were similar between EPP and P/D patients, but EPP had significantly higher rates of cardiovascular complications. After adjusting for confounders, those with a VATS approach were less likely to have any complication, compared to an open approach and significantly less likely to have a pulmonary complication. VATS-P/D remains a viable alternative to radical surgery in MPM patients allowing for improved short-term outcomes.

Postoperative radiotherapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy of malignant pleural mesothelioma was investigated in the randomized phase II trial SAKK17/04. The relapse rate within the high and/or low-dose PTV without previous distant failure was 24%, the isolated in-field-relapse rate within the PTVs was 5% and the distant relapse rate outside of the PTVs was 81%. Clinical outcome was mainly determined by distant disease progression outside of the radiation field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Trimodality therapy may prolong survival for patients with resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. However, many patients are unable to complete therapy. We sought to identify risk factors for failing to complete adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy after cytoreduction for malignant pleural mesothelioma. We performed a single-institution review of those who received an extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma from 2004 to 2017. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess preoperative or intraoperative risk factors associated with failing to complete adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy. A total of 160 patients were identified, among whom 94 (59%) received an extrapleural pneumonectomy and 66 (41%) received a pleurectomy/decortication. Adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy was completed among 105 patients (66%). Reasons for failing to complete adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy included mortality (19), dose constraints (21), postoperative morbidity or delayed recovery (11), and refused or unknown status (4). On multivariable analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists 3+ classification (P =.002) and smoking history (P =.022) were associated with failure to complete adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy, whereas forced expiratory volume in 1 second 70% or less of predicted and pStage 4 (T4) were significant on univariable analysis only. Other factors, including extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication, margin status, age, and histology, were not associated with receiving adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Many patients are unable to complete adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy after cytoreduction. Failure to complete adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy was associated with worse preoperative comorbidity, but not the type of surgery or margin status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Oncologist is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

We compared less invasive surgery with conventional surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with MPM who received surgery at Hyogo College of Medicine between July 2004 and April 2016. Patients underwent multimodal treatment comprising chemotherapy (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant) and surgery with or without 54 Gy hemithoracic radiotherapy. Patients were grouped into 3 groups according to the surgery intended: Conventional extrapleural pneumonectomy was intended in Group 1 (until August 2009); less invasive extrapleural pneumonectomy was intended in Group 2 (after September 2009); pleurectomy/decortication was intended in Group 3 (after September 2012). We included 152 patients (median age 64 [37-71] years; 131 men, 21 women), mostly with epithelioid subtypes (91.4%). Of them, 149 (98.0%) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 117 (77.0%) underwent surgery (60 had extrapleural pneumonectomy and 57 had pleurectomy/decortication). Macroscopic complete resection was achieved in 94.9% (111/117), and the mortality rates at 30 and 90 days were 1.7% (2/117) and 3.4% (4/117), respectively. The overall median survival time and progression-free survival for all 152 patients were 34.9 and 17.4 months. The overall median survival time for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 18.5, 41.9, and 43.4 months, respectively. The progression-free survival for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 12.0, 24.5, and 21.8 months, respectively. Compared with conventional surgical techniques, less invasive surgery for MPM yielded lower surgical risks and comparable or improved survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

View large Download slide View large Download slide OBJECTIVES Combined modality treatment (CMT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains a matter of debate regarding the choice of surgical procedure: extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy/decortication. METHODS We performed a prospective interventional cohort study between 2003 and 2014. All consecutive patients with any histological MPM subtype, ≤70 years old, World Health Organization performance status ≤1, medically fit for pneumonectomy and stage cT1-2cN0-2cM0 (TNM7) or lower were included. Eligibility for CMT was discussed by the multidisciplinary tumour board. Our local CMT protocol consisted of induction chemotherapy, followed by EPP and hemithoracic radiotherapy. Induction chemotherapy consisted of 3 cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m2 day 1) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 day 1), each administered once every 3 weeks. If non-progressive, EPP was performed followed by hemithoracic radiotherapy (most frequently, intensity-modulated radiotherapy; dose 54 Gy/1.8 Gy ± boost). Feasibility and long-term survival analyses were performed. Overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated from histological confirmation of a diagnosis of MPM. RESULTS Out of 197 patients, 97 started with CMT (79 epithelioid, 15 mixed and 3 sarcomatoid tumours, based on histological analysis). Clinical TNM was IA (n  = 9)/IB (n  = 8)/II (n  = 57)/III (n  = 23). A total of 76 patients underwent surgery (EPP: n  = 56; exploratory thoracotomy: n  = 20). The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.6%. Out of 56 patients who underwent surgery, 47 completed the entire CMT protocol. The intent-to-treat median and 5-year OS were 22.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 15.5–27.9] months and 11.2% (95% CI = 6.9–23.4). In patients who completed the CMT protocol (n  = 47), these values were 33.2 (95% CI = 23.0–45.0) months and 24.2% (95% CI = 13.4–43.8). The intent-to-treat median and 5-year DFS were 15.6 (95% CI = 14.0–17.3) months and 9.9% (95% CI = 5.1–19.2), 19.8 (95% CI = 16.8–27.7) months and 17.2% (95% CI = 8.6–34.1) in those who had the full CMT. The Cox proportional hazards model showed a significantly lower DFS in positive lymph nodes (HR 2.79, 95% CI=1.35-5.78; P =0.006). In 30 (64%) patients with epithelioid type MPM without positive lymph nodes (pN0) after EPP, the 5-year DFS was 27.0% (95% CI=14.1-51.7). CONCLUSIONS CMT with EPP for MPM is feasible, with an acceptable surgical mortality rate, and results in a 5-year survival rate of 24%. Careful patient selection (staging and physical performance) is extremely important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Purpose Use of extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignancy in children is rarely performed with few descriptions in the literature. In this article, we describe a 19-month-old girl who underwent an extrapleural pneumonectomy with enbloc resection of the diaphragm and pericardium for advanced pleuropulmonary blastoma. We achieved an R0 resection and survival without local disease recurrence at 23 months. Conclusion Extrapleural pneumonectomy is feasible in some circumstances to achieve oncologic control in cases of advanced PPB. This should be kept as part of the surgeons' armamentarium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study analyzed surgical results in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) who underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). Data for 44 patients who achieved macroscopic complete resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by EPP (n=29) or P/D (n=15) were reviewed. Patient demographics and oncological outcomes were compared between the EPP and P/D groups. The median overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times were 22 and 14 months, respectively. OS was significantly different between the EPP and P/D groups (median OS, 17 vs. 34 months; 5-year OS, 11 vs. 44%; P=0.019); no difference was noted in PFS (median PFS, 13 vs. 21 months; 5-year PFS, 11 vs. 17%; P=0.373). Univariate analysis demonstrated that epithelial histology (P=0.0003) and P/D (P=0.018) were significant favorable prognostic factors for OS. Using multivariate analysis, epithelial histology (P=0.001) remained the only significant factor. Post-recurrence survival (PRS) among all patients was significantly longer in the P/D group (median PRS, 3 vs. 20 months; 1.5-year PRS, 5 vs. 54%; P=0.003), even among patients with epithelial-type MPM (median PRS, 6 s vs. 20 months; 1.5-year PRS, 8 vs. 61%; P=0.012). Chemotherapy following recurrence (P=0.033) was significantly associated with superior PRS in multivariate analysis. Postoperative pulmonary function was significantly improved in the P/D group. In summary, P/D may be an alternative procedure to EPP for resectable MPM providing similar PFS and improved PRS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We reviewed the available literature on patients with MPM undergoing either extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy/decortication (P/D).Methods: Original research studies that evaluated long-term outcomes of P/D versus EPP were identified, from January 1990 to July 2018. The 30 and 90 days mortality, along with the 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-year survival, the median overall survival and the complications were calculated according to both a fixed and a random effect model. The Q statistics and I2 statistic were used to test for heterogeneity among the studies.Results: Fifteen studies were included, incorporating a total of 1672 patients treated with EPP and 2236 treated with P/D. The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the EPP group [OR 3.24 (95% CI 1.70, 6.20); p < 0.001]. The median overall survival was significantly increased in the P/D group [WMD − 4.20 (− 5.66, − 2.74); p < 0.001]. No significant differences were found regarding the 90-day mortality and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-year survival between the EPP and P/D groups. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, hemorrhage, empyema, bronchopleural fistula and air leak was significantly increased in the EPP group (p < 0.05).Conclusions: The present meta-analysis indicates that P/D is associated with enhanced outcomes regarding 30-day mortality, median overall survival, and complications. The P/D approach, should, therefore be preferred when technically feasible. However, the decision regarding the procedure of choice should be made on the basis of the disease status and the surgeon's experience. Well-designed, randomized studies, comparing EPP to P/D, are necessary to further assess their clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease and management of localized disease is controversial. Radiotherapy has been shown to be useful after extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), as well as with less aggressive surgery. As no reports of the treatment of this disease have ever been published from Israel, we report our experience with MPM and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods: The complete medical records of patients treated for MPM at the Rabin Medical Center from 1 August 2007 to 31 March 2016 were reviewed. Twenty‐seven patients were treated with IMRT, either post‐EPP or without EPP. Patients received 54 Gy in 2 Gy fractions using the restricted field IMRT technique. Chemotherapy was administered sequentially in 26% of patients. Patients were followed up from the date of diagnosis to death or treatment failure. Results: Seventy‐eight percent of patients had the epithelioid subtype. Nearly all patients were male (85%) and 90% of non‐surgical patients were administered chemotherapy compared to 56% of post‐EPP patients. All patients completed therapy and only 16% had grade 1–2 radiation pneumonitis, with no incidence of grade 3 or higher. The median follow‐up was 22 months and the mean overall survival was 34.9 months. The mean time to progression following radiation therapy was 26.7 months. The mean time to local and distant failure was 19 and 16 months, respectively. Conclusions: IMRT for localized pleural mesothelioma is a tolerable and effective therapy both post‐EPP or without surgery. These results suggest that future investigation in this area is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment options for bronchial fistula (BF) after pneumonectomy are often limited and carry significant morbidity and mortality. The patient underwent right extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma had BF without macroscopic fistula found by bronchography. We treated this minor BF using bronchoscopy with the administration of OK-432, fibroblast growth factor basic, and fibrin glue sealant. Two weeks after this treatment, we confirmed the improvement of the fistula by bronchography. Bronchoscopic therapy for BF was useful for a small, early fistula without infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]