Search

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition affecting >10% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients worldwide with a mortality of up to 59% depending on severity. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a potentially life-saving procedure in severe ARDS but is technically and financially challenging. In recent years, various scoring systems have been proposed to select patients most likely to benefit from ECMO, with the PREdiction of Survival on ECMO Therapy (PRESET) score being one of the most used. We collected data from 283 patients with ARDS of various etiology who underwent veno-venous (V-V) ECMO therapy at a German tertiary care ICU from January 2012 to December 2022. Median age in the cohort was 56 years, and 64.31% were males. The in-hospital mortality rate was 50.88% (n = 144). The median (25%; 75% quartile) severity scores were 38 (31; 49) for Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, 12 (10; 13) for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and 7 (5; 8) for PRESET. Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II displayed the best prognostic value (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC]: 0.665 [confidence interval (CI): 0.574-0.756; p = 0.046]). Prediction performance was weak in all analyzed scores despite good calibration. Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II had the best discrimination after adjustment of our original cohort. The use of scores explored in this study for patient selection for eligibility for V-V ECMO is not recommendable., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

Introduction: Most patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decease during therapy on the system. However, the actual causes of death have not been studied sufficiently. This study analyses the etiology, prevalence, and risk factors for the outcome variable death during ongoing ECMO for all patients and divided according to venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV) support., Methods: We retrospectively analysed all patients receiving ECMO support at our institution between March 2006 to January 2021. Only the patients deceased during ongoing support were included., Results: 2016 patients were placed on VA ( n = 1168; 58%) or VV ( n = 848; 42%) ECMO; 759 patients (37.7%) deceased on support. The causes of death differed between the support types: VA ECMO patients mostly died from cerebral ischemia (34%), low-cardiac output (LCO; 24.1%) and multi-organ failure (MOF; 21.6%), whereas in VV ECMO cases, refractory respiratory failure (28.2%), and sepsis (20.4%) dominated. Multivariate regression analysis revealed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and acidosis prior to ECMO as risk factors for dying on VA ECMO, while high inotropic doses pre-ECMO, a high fraction of inspired oxygen on day 1, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and international normalized ratio levels lead to an unfavourable outcome in VV ECMO patients., Conclusion: Even in highly experienced centers, ECMO mortality remains high and occurs mainly on support or 24 h after its termination. The causes of death differ between VV and VA ECMO, depending on the underlying diseases responsible for the need of extracorporeal support., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objectives: The use of awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO, without intubation or sedation under ECMO support in patients with cardiogenic shock is growing rapidly because emerging clinical investigations indicates it may reduce morbidity associated with sedation and intubation. We systematically reviewed the efficacy of awake ECMO and provided evidence for clinical practitioners and researchers., Design: Systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis based on observational studies., Data Sources: Data was retrieved from seven databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Cochrane Library) up to 1 March 2024., Eligibility Criteria: We included observational studies that compared the differences in clinical outcomes between awake ECMO and non-awake ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers rigorously conducted literature retrieval, screening and data extraction. The RevMan software was used for data synthesis., Results: Five retrospective observational studies involving 1044 patients with cardiogenic shock were included. Compared with non-awake ECMO, awake ECMO was associated with a lower mortality rate of patients with cardiogenic shock (OR=0.28; 95% CI, (0.15, 0.49); p<0.0001; I 2 =50%). Trial sequential analysis indicated that the sample mortality outcome reached the required information size. No significant differences were observed between the two groups on secondary outcomes such as the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, weaning from ECMO, tracheostomy, haemorrhage, thrombosis, limb ischaemia and nosocomial infection., Conclusions: Implementing awake ECMO may result in better clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock. Because of the limited sample sizes and potential bias of the current studies, more rigorously designed large-scale trials are urgently needed to verify the above findings., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42023407607., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) and the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) may be affected by the timing of hospital admission., Objectives: The present ECLS-SHOCK substudy sought to investigate the prognostic impact of on-hours vs off-hours admission and the efficacy of ELCS according to the timing of hospital admission time in AMI-CS., Methods: Patients with AMI-CS enrolled in the multicenter, randomized ECLS-SHOCK trial from 2019 to 2022 were included. The prognosis of patients admitted during regular hours (ie, on-hours) was compared to patients admitted during off-hours. Thereafter, the prognostic impact of ECLS was investigated stratified by the timing of hospital admission. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier, univariable, and multivariable logistic regression analyses., Results: Of 417 patients enrolled in the ECLS-SHOCK trial, 48.4% (n = 202) were admitted during off-hours. Patients admitted during off-hours were younger (median age = 62 years [Q1-Q3: 55-69 years] vs 63 years [Q1-Q3: 58-71 years]; P = 0.036) and more commonly treated using initial femoral access for coronary angiography (79.0% [n = 158/200] vs 67.9% [n = 146/215]; P = 0.011). However, off-hours admission was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (off-hours vs on-hours: 46.0% [n = 93/202] vs 50.7% [n = 109/215]; OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.56-1.22). Furthermore, ECLS had no prognostic impact on 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with AMI-CS admitted during on-hours (50.5% [n = 52/103] vs 50.9% [n = 57/112]; P = 0.95; OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.58-1.68) or in patients admitted during off-hours (45.3% [n = 48/106] vs 46.9% [n = 45/96]; P = 0.82; OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.54-1.63). Finally, ECLS was associated with an increased risk of bleeding events, especially in patients admitted during on-hours., Conclusions: The prognosis in AMI-CS was not affected by admission time with a similar effect of ECLS during on- and off-hours., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosure Supported by the Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation, the German Heart Research Foundation, and the Helios Health Institute (formerly Leipzig Heart Institute). Dr Rassaf has received honoraria, lecture fees, and grant support from Edwards Lifesciences, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Berlin Chemie, Daiicho-Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Cardiac Dimensions, and Pfizer, all unrelated to this work; and is a cofounder of Bimyo GmbH, a company that develops cardioprotective peptides. Dr Clemmensen has previously or currently been involved in research contracts, consulting, and Speakers Bureau for Abbott, Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Aventis, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CeleCor, CytoSorbent, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli-Lilly, Evolva, Ferrer, Fibrex, Idorsia, Janssen, Merck, Myogen, Medtronic, Mitsubishi Pharma, The Medicines Company, Nycomed, Organon, Pfizer, Pharmacia, Philips, Regado, Sanofi, Searle, Servier, and ViFor Pharma; and has received research and/or educational grants from Abbott, Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Aventis, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CeleCor, CytoSorbent, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli-Lilly, Evolva, Ferrer, Fibrex, Idorsia, Janssen, Merck, Myogen, Medtronic, Mitsubishi Pharma, The Medicines Company, Nycomed, Organon, Pfizer, Pharmacia, Philips, Regado, Sanofi, Searle, Servier, and ViFor Pharma. Dr Linke has received grants from Novartis and Edwards Lifesciences; has received personal fees from Abbott, Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Meril, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and Pfizer; and has received other fees from Picardia, Filterlex, and Transverse Medical outside the submitted work. Dr Pöss has received research grants (institutional) from German Cardiac Society, German Heart Research Foundation, Dr Rolf M. Schwiete Foundation, and Maquet Cardiopulmonary GmbH. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement Dr Ranjit John has received research support from Abbott Medical. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the cornerstone intervention for cardiac arrest, with extracorporeal CPR (ECPR) demonstrating enhanced survival and neurologic outcomes in in-hospital cardiac arrest. This study explores the time interval between CPR initiation and the onset of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in ECPR recipients, investigating its impact on survival outcomes., Methods: This retrospective analysis included 1950 adults who received CPR at a single medical center between March 2019 and April 2023. Data from 198 adult patients who had ECMO inserted during CPR were analyzed. The interval from CPR initiation to ECMO initiation was quantified and categorized as ≤20, 20-40, and >40 min. Cox regression analysis assessed associations between CPR-to-ECMO time and short- and long-term mortalities., Results: Among the 198 patients who underwent ECPR, 116 (58.6%) experienced 30-day mortality. Initiation of ECMO within 20 min occurred in 46 (23.2%), whereas 74 (37.4%) had ECMO initiated after 40 min. Cox regression revealed a significant association between time from CPR to ECMO initiation and 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.20 in >40 min, HR: 2.63 in 20-40 min, p = 0.006) and 6-month mortality (HR: 1.81, in >40 min, HR: 1.99 in 20-40 min, p = 0.021)., Conclusions: This study revealed that, in ECPR recipients, a shorter duration between CPR initiation and ECMO flow commencement is associated with improved short- and long-term patient prognoses. These findings emphasize the critical role of timely ECMO application in optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing ECPR., (© 2024 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.)

Background:  The rationale of the study was to analyze the impact of age on quality of life (QoL) in patients who had undergone cardiac surgery with consecutive extracorporeal life support (ECLS) treatment., Methods:  The study population consisted of 200 patients, operated upon between August 2006 and December 2018. The patient cohort was divided into two groups following an arbitrary cutoff age of 70 years. Comparative outcome analysis was calculated utilizing the European Quality of Life-5-Dimensions-5-Level Version (EQ-5D-5L)., Results:  A total of 113 patients were 70 years or less old (group young), whereas 87 patients were older than 70 years (group old). In 45.7% of cases, the ECLS system was established during cardiogenic shock and external cardiac massage. The overall survival-to-discharge was 31.5% ( n  = 63), with a significantly better survival in the younger patient group (young = 38.9%; old = 21.8%, p  = 0.01). Forty-two patients (66%) responded to the QoL survey after a median follow-up of 4.3 years. Older patients reported more problems with mobility (y = 52%; o = 88%, p  = 0.02) and self-care (y = 24%; o = 76%, p  = 0.01). However, the patients' self-rated health status utilizing the Visual Analogue Scale revealed no differences (y = 70% [50-80%]; o = 70% [60-80%], p  = 0.38). Likewise, the comparison with an age-adjusted German reference population revealed similar QoL indices. There were no statistically significant differences in the EQ-5D-5L index values related to sex, number of comorbidities, and emergency procedures., Conclusion:  Despite the limited sample size due to the high mortality rate especially in elderly, the present study suggests that QoL of elderly patients surviving ECLS treatment is almost comparable to younger patients., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Morbid obesity may influence candidacy for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VVECMO) support. Indeed, body mass index (BMI) >40 is considered to be a relative contraindication due to increased mortality observed in patients with BMI above this value. There is scant evidence to characterize this relationship beyond speculating about the technical challenges of cannulation and difficulty in optimizing flows. We examined a national cohort to evaluate the influence of BMI on mortality in patients requiring VVECMO for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis on National COVID Cohort Collaborative data evaluating 1,033,229 patients with BMI ≤60 from 31 US hospital systems diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome virus coronavirus 2 infection from September 2019 to August 2022. We performed univariate and multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analysis on data pertaining to those who required VVECMO support during their hospitalization. A subgroup risk-adjusted analysis comparing ECMO mortality in patients with BMI 40 to 60 with the 25th, 50th, and 75th BMI percentile was performed. Outcomes of interest included BMI, age, comorbidity score, body surface area, and ventilation days., Results: A total of 774 adult patients required VVECMO. Of these, 542 were men, median age was 47 years, mean adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index was 1, and median BMI was 33. Overall mortality was 47.8%. There was a nonsignificant overall difference in mortality across hospitals (SD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0-0.57). After mixed multivariable logistic regression analysis, advanced age (P < .0001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = .009) were each associated with increased mortality. Neither gender (P = .14) nor duration on mechanical ventilation (P = .39) was associated with increased mortality. An increase in BMI from 25th to 75th percentile was not associated with a difference in mortality (P = .28). In our multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analysis, there exists a nonlinear relationship between BMI and mortality. Between BMI of 25 and 32, patients experienced an increase in mortality. However, between BMI of 32 and 37, the adjusted mortality in these patients subsequently decreased. Our subgroup analysis comparing BMIs 40 to 60 with the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of BMI found no significant difference in ECMO mortality between BMI values of 40 and 60 with the 25th, 50th, 75th percentile., Conclusions: Advancing age and higher CCI are each associated with increased risk for mortality in patients requiring VVECMO. A nonlinear relationship exists between mortality and BMI and those between 32 and 37 have lower odds of mortality than those between BMI 25 and 32. This nonlinear pattern suggests a need for further adjudication of the contraindications associated with VVECMO, particularly those based solely on BMI., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The ACTION-SHOCK registry offers a decade-long perspective on patients admitted with cardiogenic shock (CS)., Aims: To assess trends in the management and outcomes of patients with CS over 10 years., Methods: Trends in the characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with CS admitted into the cardiac intensive care unit of Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital from 2011 to 2020 were analysed. Short-term outcomes included in-hospital mortality, heart transplantation or ventricular assist device. Long-term outcomes were all-cause death or readmission for acute heart failure at 1 year., Results: Over a 10-year period, data from 700 patients with CS (median [interquartile range] age 61 [50-72] years; 73% of men) were analysed. The proportion of CS related to acute myocardial infarction decreased (from 45% in 2011-2012 to 27% in 2019-2020) while the proportions related to chronic coronary syndrome (18% to 23%) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies (37 to 51%) increased (P<0.01). The use of rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remained stable (19 to 14%) and intra-aortic balloon pump use decreased (22% to 7%) (P<0.01). In-hospital mortality remained stable (27 to 29%) as did the proportions of patients discharged after transplantation (17 to 14%) or with a durable ventricular assist device (2 to 4%). Among patients discharged alive, death or readmission for acute heart failure at 1 year remained high (37 to 47%)., Conclusion: CS remained associated with a poor prognosis over the last decade. There are significant unmet needs in the management strategies of patients with CS., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) has expanded considerably, though evidence-based selection criteria and long-term outcome data are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether risk factors often used to exclude patients from ECMO BTT-specifically older age and not yet being listed for transplant-are validated by long-term outcomes., Methods: To ensure minimum 5-year follow-up, a retrospective cohort study was performed of adult patients actively listed for lung transplantation at a high-volume center and bridged on ECMO between January 2012 and December 2017. Data was collected through January 1, 2023., Results: Among 50 patients bridged on ECMO, 25 survived to transplant. Median age at listing was 58 (interquartile range [IQR], 42-65) in the transplanted group and 65 (IQR, 56.5-69) in the deceased group (P = 0.051). One-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival were 88% (22/25), 60% (15/25), and 44% (11/25), respectively, with eight patients still living at the time of review. Median time spent at home during the year post-transplant was 340 days (IQR, 314-355). Older age at listing was a negative predictor of survival on ECMO to transplant (odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99], P = 0.01). Thirteen patients were placed on ECMO prior to being listed and three were listed the same day as ECMO cannulation, with 10/16 transplanted. No significant difference in post-transplant survival was found between patients placed on ECMO prior to listing (n = 10) and those already listed (n = 15) (P = 0.93, log-rank). Serial post-transplant spirometry up to 5 years and surveillance transbronchial biopsy demonstrated good allograft function and low rates of cellular rejection., Conclusions: In one of the oldest cohorts of ECMO BTT patients described, favorable survival outcomes and allograft function were observed up to 5 years irrespective of whether patients were previously listed or bridged to decision. Despite inherent limitations to this retrospective, single-center study, the data presented support the feasibility of ECMO BTT in older and not previously listed advanced lung disease patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an advanced technique using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to support patients with refractory cardiac arrest. Age significantly influences ECPR outcomes, with younger patients generally experiencing better survival and neurological outcomes due to many aspects. This review explores the impact of age on ECPR effectiveness, emphasizing the need to consider age alongside other clinical factors in patient selection. Survival rates differ notably between in-hospital (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), highlighting the importance of rapid intervention. The potential of artificial intelligence to develop predictive models for ECPR outcomes is discussed, aiming to improve decision-making. Ethical considerations around age-based treatment decisions are also addressed. This review advocates for a balanced approach to ECPR, integrating clinical and ethical perspectives to optimize patient outcomes across all age groups.

Objectives: Our goal was to determine the predictive role of the combined assessment of the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) and lactate levels for the prognosis of patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO)., Methods: The data of adult patients with PCS requiring VA-ECMO between January 2015 and December 2018 at a tertiary hospital were analysed retrospectively. The incidence of in-hospital mortality and other clinical outcomes was analysed. The associations of the VIS and the lactate concentration and in-hospital mortality were assessed using logistic regression analysis., Results: A total of 222 patients were included and divided into 4 groups according to the cut-off points of the VIS (24.3) and the lactate level (6.85 mmol/L). The in-hospital mortality rates were 37.7%, 50.7%, 54.8% and 76.5% for the 4 groups (P < 0.001), and the rates of successful weaning off VA-ECMO were 73.9%, 69%, 61.3% and 39.2%, respectively (P = 0.001). Groups 1 and 2 exhibited significant differences compared to group 4 in both in-hospital mortality and weaning rates (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of multiple organ dysfunction between group 1 and group 4 (P < 0.05). Groups 1, 2 and 3 demonstrated significantly improved cumulative 30-day survival compared with group 4 (log-rank test, P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age, a VIS > 24.3 and lactate levels > 6.85 mmol/L were independently predictive of in-hospital mortality., Conclusions: Among patients with PCS requiring VA-ECMO, the initiation before reaching a VIS > 24.3 and lactate levels > 6.85 mmol/L was associated with improved in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, suggesting that the combined assessment of the VIS and lactate levels may be instructive for determining the initiation of VA-ECMO., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Vascular complications (VCs) associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during index hospitalization are prevalent and associated with increased mortality. Few studies have evaluated late VCs following ECMO; this study aims to assess occurrence and management practices of late VCs following discharge., Methods: A retrospective single-institution review was performed of all patients surviving initial hospitalization after being cannulated for central or peripheral veno-venous (VV) or veno-arterial (VA) ECMO between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Primary outcomes were to categorize and determine the rate of late VCs. Late VCs were defined as any cannulated vessel injury resulting from ECMO cannulation presenting after discharge from index hospitalization. Analysis was conducted by cannulated vessel and stratified by VV or VA ECMO configurations., Results: A total of 229 patients were identified, of which 50.6% (n = 116) survived until discharge. Late VCs occurred in 7.8% of the surviving cohort (n = 9/116); with a median time until presentation of 150 days (interquartile range, 83-251 days). The most common late VC was infection (n = 5; 55.6%) followed by progression to limb-threatening ischemia (n = 4; 44.4%). Urgent procedures were required in 55.6% of patients (n = 5), whereas 44.4% (n = 4) were elective interventions. Interventions performed for management of late VCs included lower extremity arterial revascularization (n = 6; 66.7%), major (n = 1; 11.1%) or minor amputation (n = 1; 11.1%), and wound debridement (n = 1; 11.1%). The majority of patients presenting with late VCs had initially been cannulated for peripheral VA ECMO (n = 8; 88.9%), and one patient (11.1%) was cannulated for peripheral VV ECMO. VCs during index hospitalization were seen in 77.8% of patients (n = 7) returning with late VCs. Odds for late VCs were significantly increased in patients that had been cannulated for ECMO as part of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio, 8.4; P = .016) and in cases where patients had experienced an index VC during index hospitalization (odds ratio, 19.3; P = .001)., Conclusions: Late vascular complications after peripheral ECMO cannulation are not rare, particularly after arterial cannulation. Patients should be followed closely early after surviving ECMO with wound evaluation and formal assessment of perfusion with ankle-branchial indices in the cannulated limb., Competing Interests: Disclosures A.W.B. reports consulting for Artivion, Cook Medical, Medtronic, Philips, and Terumo Aortic; and research support from Cook Medical, Medtronic, Philips, Terumo Aortic, W.L. Gore & Associates (all proceeds to the U. of Alabama at Birmingham)., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Lung transplant for acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was rare before 2020, but was rapidly adopted to rescue patients with COVID-19 with lung failure. This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent lung transplant for COVID-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome and non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome, and to assess the impact of type and duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support on survival., Methods: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified 311 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who underwent lung transplant from 2007 to 2022 and performed a retrospective analysis of the patients who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation preoperatively, stratified by COVID-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome and non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome listing diagnoses. The primary outcome was 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes included the effect of type and duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on survival., Results: During the study period, 236 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation underwent lung transplant; 181 patients had a listing diagnosis of COVID-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (77%), and 55 patients had a listing diagnosis of non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome (23%). Patients with COVID-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome were older, were more likely to be female, had higher body mass index, and spent longer on the waitlist (all P < .02) than patients with non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome. The 2 groups had similar 1-year survival (85.8% vs 81.1%, P = .2) with no differences in postoperative complications. Patients with COVID-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome required longer times on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation pretransplant (P = .02), but duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was not a predictor of 1-year survival (P = .2)., Conclusions: Despite prolonged periods of pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, selected patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome can undergo lung transplant safely with acceptable short-term outcomes. Appropriate selection criteria and long-term implications require further analysis., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement C.B. is on the medical advisory boards of Abiomed and Abbott. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: The prognosis-predicting factors for non-surgical patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains limited. In this study, we aim to analyze prognosis-predicting factors in the non-surgical patients receiving these two therapies., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from non-surgical patients with ECMO treatment from December 2013 until April 2023. Hospital mortality was primary endpoint of this study. The area under the curve and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of mortality. The independent risk factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression. The prediction model was a nomogram, and decision curve analysis and the calibration plot were used to assess it. Using restricted cubic spline curves and Spearman correlation, the correlation analysis was performed., Results: The model that incorporated CRRT duration and age surpassed the two variables alone in predicting hospital mortality in non-surgical patients with ECMO therapy (AUC value = 0.868, 95% CI = 0.779-0.956). Older age, CRRT implantation, and duration were independent risk factors for hospital mortality (all p  < 0.05). The nomogram predicting outcomes model containing on CRRT implantation and duration was developed, and the consistency between the predicted probability and observed probability and clinical utility of the models were good. CRRT duration was negatively associated with hemoglobin concentration and positively associated with urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels., Conclusion: Hospital mortality in non-surgical ECMO patients was found to be independently associated with older age, longer CRRT duration, and CRRT implantation.

Objective: Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are often complex and have a high mortality rate. Currently, risk assessment and treatment decisions for patients receiving ECMO are controversial. Therefore, we sought to identify risk factors for mortality in patients receiving ECMO and provide a reference for patient management., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 199 patients who received ECMO support from December 2013 to April 2023. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors. The cutoff value was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis., Results: A total of 199 patients were selected for this study, and the mortality rate was 76.38%. More than half of the patients underwent surgery during hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) implantation (OR = 2.994; 95% CI, 1.405-6.167; p  = 0.004) and age (OR = 1.021; 95% CI, 1.002-1.040; p  = 0.032) were the independent risk factors for mortality. In the ROC curve analysis, age had the best predictive effect (AUC 0.646, 95% CI 0.559-0.732, p  = 0.003) for death when the cutoff value was 48.5 years. Furthermore, in patients receiving combined CRRT and ECMO, lack of congenital heart disease and previous surgical history were the independent risk factors for mortality., Conclusions: CRRT implantation and age were independent risk factors for patients with ECMO implantation in a predominantly surgical cohort. In patients receiving a combination of CRRT and ECMO, lack of congenital heart disease and previous surgical history were independent risk factors for mortality.

Introduction: The optimal modality for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare outcomes between continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in VA-ECMO patients., Methods: This single-center retrospective study included VA-ECMO patients who developed AKI and subsequently required CRRT or PD. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, RRT modality, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with secondary outcomes including length of stays, RRT durations, and complications associated with RRT., Results: A total of 43 patients were included (72.1% male, mean age 58.2 ± 15.7 years). Of these, 21 received CRRT and 22 received PD during ECMO therapy. In-hospital mortality rates did not significantly differ between CRRT and PD groups (80.9% vs 90.9%, p = 0.35). However, PD was associated with a higher incidence of catheter-related complications, including malposition (31.8% vs 4.7%, p = 0.046), infection (22.7% vs 4.7%, p = 0.19), and bleeding (18.2% vs 9.5%, p = 0.66), respectively., Conclusion: Among patients receiving VA-ECMO-supported RRT, our study revealed comparable in-hospital mortality rates between CRRT and PD, although PD was associated with a higher incidence of catheter-related complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The efficacy of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remains unclear, and recipients of the more contemporary HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD are not well represented in previous studies. We therefore undertook a multicenter, retrospective study of this population., Methods and Results: INTERMACS 1 LVAD recipients from five U.S. centers were included. In-hospital and one-year outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome was the overall mortality hazard comparing ECMO versus non-ECMO patients by propensity-weighted survival analysis. Secondary outcomes included survival by LVAD type, as well as postoperative and one-year outcomes. One hundred and twenty-seven patients were included; 24 received ECMO as a bridge to LVAD. Mortality was higher in patients bridged with ECMO in the primary analysis (HR 3.22 [95%CI 1.06-9.77], p = 0.039). Right ventricular assist device was more common in the ECMO group (ECMO: 54.2% vs non-ECMO: 11.7%, p < 0.001). Ischemic stroke was higher at one year in the ECMO group (ECMO: 25.0% vs non-ECMO: 4.9%, p = 0.006). Among the study cohort, one-year mortality was lower in HM3 than in HeartMate II (HMII) or HeartWare HVAD (10.5% vs 46.9% vs 31.6%, respectively; p < 0.001) recipients. Pump thrombosis at one year was lower in HM3 than in HMII or HVAD (1.8% vs 16.1% vs 16.2%, respectively; p = 0.026) recipients., Conclusions: Higher mortality was observed with ECMO as a bridge to LVAD, likely due to higher acuity illness, yet acceptable one-year survival was seen compared with historical rates. The receipt of the HM3 was associated with improved survival compared with older generation devices., (© 2024 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has gained traction as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT) but remains associated with increased waitlist mortality. This study explores whether this risk is modified by underlying heart failure (HF) etiology., Methods: Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry, we conducted a retrospective review of first-time adult HT candidates from 2018 through 2022. Patients were categorized as "ECMO", if ECMO was utilized during the waitlisting period, or "No ECMO" otherwise. Patients were then stratified according to the following HF etiology: ischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP), dilated nonischemic CMP, restrictive CMP, hypertrophic CMP, and congenital heart disease (CHD). After baseline comparisons, waitlist mortality was characterized for ECMO and HF etiology using the Fine-Gray regression., Results: A total of 16 143 patients were identified of whom 7.0% (n = 1063) were bridged with ECMO. Compared to No ECMO patients, ECMO patients had shorter waitlist durations (46.3 vs. 185.0 days, p < 0.01) and were more likely to undergo transplantation (75.3% vs. 70.3%, p < 0.01). Outcomes analysis revealed that ECMO was associated with increased mortality risk (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 3.42, p < 0.01), a risk that persisted in all subgroups and was notably high in CHD (SHR: 4.83, p < 0.01) and hypertrophic CMP (SHR: 9.78, p < 0.01). HF etiology comparison within ECMO patients revealed increased mortality risk with CHD (SHR: 3.22, p < 0.01). Within No ECMO patients, hypertrophic CMP patients had lower mortality risk (SHR: 0.64, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: The increased waitlist mortality risk with ECMO persisted after stratification by HF etiology. These findings can help decision-making surrounding candidacy for cannulation and prognostic evaluation., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) carries significant 30-day mortality risk, and a change in societal guidelines has promoted the increasing use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the immediate management of MPE-associated cardiovascular shock. This narrative review examines the current status of ECMO in MPE., Methods: A literature review was performed from 1982 to 2022 searching for the terms "Pulmonary embolism" and "ECMO," and the search was refined by examining those publications that covered MPE., Results: In the patient with MPE, veno-arterial ECMO is now recommended as a bridge to interventional therapy. It can reliably decrease right ventricular overload, improve RV function, and allow hemodynamic stability and restoration of tissue oxygenation. The use of ECMO in MPE has been associated with lower mortality in registry reviews, but there has been no significant difference in outcomes between patients treated with and without ECMO in meta-analyses. Applying ECMO is also associated with substantial multisystem morbidity due to systemic inflammatory response, bleeding with coagulopathy, hemorrhagic stroke, renal dysfunction, and acute limb ischemia, which must be factored into the outcomes., Conclusions: The application of ECMO in MPE should be combined with an aggressive interventional pulmonary interventional program and should strictly adhere to the current selection criteria., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a resource-intensive approach for the management of refractory cardiogenic shock. Within this population exists a substantial cohort of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), which independently increases the risk of complications and all-cause mortality. We studied 10-year national trends of the impact of PAD among VA-ECMO recipients to better understand the prevalence of PAD and implications on outcomes in this vulnerable population., Methods: This 10-year retrospective, propensity score-matched study identified all adult patients (≥18) who underwent VA-ECMO between 2009 and 2018, from a large US database (National Inpatient Sample). Patients with an ICD diagnosis of PAD were identified. The primary endpoints of in-hospital mortality, bleeding complications and major limb loss (above- or below-knee amputation) were compared between patients with PAD to those without., Results: A total of 6768 patients were identified, of which 342 (5.3%) had PAD. The median age at admission was significantly higher in PAD patients [64 years vs. 55 years; p < .01], as was male gender [71% vs. 64%; p < .01]. Patients with PAD had higher rates of smoking (38.9% vs. 23.3%), hypertension (71.1% vs. 50%), diabetes (37.4% vs. 27.0%), chronic kidney disease (30.1% vs. 18.0%), coronary artery disease (76.0% vs. 35.0%) and dyslipidemia (76.0% vs. 35.0); all p < .01. After propensity-matching 2:1 for comorbidities, PAD patients were found to have significantly greater overall complications, including in-hospital mortality, bleeding, surgical wound infections, pseudoaneurysms, and major adverse limb events [71.9% vs. 63.9%; p < .01]. Subgroup analysis revealed greater in-hospital mortality [62.2% vs. 55.3%; p < .05], major amputations [4.1% vs. 0.3%; p < .01] and blood transfusions [32.2% vs. 26.2%; p < .05] in PAD patients. Over 2014-2018, the non-PAD group demonstrated statistically discernable trends in a 51.1% decrease in overall complications and a 28.1% increase in survival to discharge (all p < .01). Over the same time period the PAD cohort experienced a modest, nonsignificant, decrease in complications [7.0%, p = .40] and a decrease in those surviving to discharge [47.1% vs. 40.5%, p = .91]., Conclusion: Patients with PAD on VA-ECMO are sicker at baseline and experience significantly greater major amputations and higher in-hospital mortality. They have not benefitted from the considerable decrease in complication rates and increase in survival to discharge over time as compared to their non-PAD counterparts. These findings demonstrate the substantial frailty of the PAD population within an already high-risk cohort, and highlight the need for better procedural approaches and innovative technologies., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objectives: The Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support System After Extracorporeal Life Support registry is a multicenter registry of patients who were bridged from extracorporeal life support to a durable mechanical circulatory support system. Although numerous studies have highlighted the favorable outcomes after implantation of the HeartMate 3 (Abbott), the objective of our study is to examine the outcomes of patients who received HeartMate 3 support after extracorporeal life support., Methods: Data of patients undergoing HeartMate 3 implantation from January 2016 to April 2022 at 14 centers were collected and evaluated. Inclusion criteria were patients with extracorporeal life support before HeartMate 3 implantation. The outcome was reported and compared with patients receiving other types of pumps., Results: A total of 337 patients were bridged to durable mechanical circulatory support system after extracorporeal life support in the study period. Of those patients, 140 were supported with the HeartMate 3. The other types of pumps included 170 HeartWare HVADs (Medtronic) (86%), 14 HeartMate II devices (7%), and 13 (7%) other pumps (7%). Major postoperative complications included right heart failure requiring temporary right ventricular assist device in 60 patients (47%). Significantly lower postoperative stroke (16% vs 28%, P = .01) and pump thrombosis (3% vs 8%, P = .02) rates were observed in the patients receiving the HeartMate 3. The 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year survivals in patients receiving the HeartMate 3 were 87%, 73%, and 65%, respectively., Conclusions: In this critically ill patient population, the survivals of patients who were transitioned to the HeartMate 3 are deemed acceptable and superior to those observed when extracorporeal life support was bridged to other types of durable mechanical circulatory support systems., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS) necessitating peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) often require an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella for unloading; however, comparative effectiveness data are currently lacking., Methods and results: Using Diagnosis Procedure Combination data from approximately 1,200 Japanese acute care hospitals (April 2018-March 2022), we identified 940 patients aged ≥18 years with CS necessitating peripheral VA-ECMO along with IABP (ECMO-IABP; n=801) or Impella (ECPella; n=139) within 48 h of admission. Propensity score matching (126 pairs) indicated comparable in-hospital mortality between the ECPella and ECMO-IABP groups (50.8% vs. 50.0%, respectively; P=1.000). However, the ECPella cohort was on mechanical ventilator support for longer (median [interquartile range] 11.5 [5.0-20.8] vs. 9.0 [4.0-16.8] days; P=0.008) and had a longer hospital stay (median [interquartile range] 32.5 [12.0-59.0] vs. 23.0 [6.3-43.0] days; P=0.017) than the ECMO-IABP cohort. In addition, medical costs were higher for the ECPella than ECMO-IABP group (median [interquartile range] 9.09 [7.20-12.20] vs. 5.23 [3.41-7.00] million Japanese yen; P<0.001)., Conclusions: Our nationwide study could not demonstrate compelling evidence to support the superior efficacy of Impella over IABP in reducing in-hospital mortality among patients with CS necessitating VA-ECMO. Further investigations are imperative to determine the clinical situations in which the potential effect of Impella can be maximized.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been presented as a potential therapeutic option for patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction (CS-MI). We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ECMO in CS-MI., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials obtained from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science until September 2023. We used the random-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio and continuous outcomes using mean difference with a 95% confidence interval. Finally, we implemented a trial sequential analysis to evaluate the reliability of our results., Results: We included four trials with 611 patients. No significant difference was observed between ECMO and standard care groups in 30-day mortality with pooled RR of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.81-1.13, p = 0.60), acute kidney injury (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.41-1.03, p = 0.07), stroke (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.38-3.57, p = 0.80), sepsis (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.77-1.47, p = 0.71), pneumonia (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.58-1.68, p = 0.96), and 30-day reinfarction (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.25-3.60, p = 0.94). However, the ECMO group had higher bleeding events (RR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.44-2.97, p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: ECMO did not improve clinical outcomes compared to the standard of care in patients with CS-MI but increased the bleeding risk., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with PaO 2 /FiO 2  < 80 mmHg is a life-threatening condition. The optimal management strategy is unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of low tidal volumes (V t ), moderate V t , prone ventilation, and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) on mortality in severe ARDS., Methods: We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with participants who had severe ARDS and met eligibility criteria for VV-ECMO or had PaO 2 /FiO 2  < 80 mmHg. We applied the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to discern the relative effect of interventions on mortality and the certainty of the evidence., Results: Ten RCTs including 812 participants with severe ARDS were eligible. VV-ECMO reduces mortality compared to low V t (risk ratio [RR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.99, moderate certainty) and compared to moderate V t (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.98, low certainty). Prone ventilation reduces mortality compared to moderate V t (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.93, high certainty) and compared to low V t (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63-1.02, moderate certainty). We found no difference in the network comparison of VV-ECMO compared to prone ventilation (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72-1.26), but inferences were based solely on indirect comparisons with very low certainty due to very wide confidence intervals., Conclusions: In adults with ARDS and severe hypoxia, both VV-ECMO (low to moderate certainty evidence) and prone ventilation (moderate to high certainty evidence) improve mortality relative to low and moderate V t strategies. The impact of VV-ECMO versus prone ventilation remains uncertain., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: Extracorporeal life support can lead to rapid reversal of hypoxemia but the benefits and harms of different oxygenation targets in severely ill patients are unclear. Our primary objective was to investigate the association between the Pa o2 after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) initiation and mortality in neonates treated for respiratory failure., Design: Retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry data, 2015-2020., Patients: Newborns supported by ECMO for respiratory indication were included., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Pa o2 24 hours after ECMO initiation (H24 Pa o2 ) was reported. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. We identified 3533 newborns (median age 1 d [interquartile range (IQR), 1-3]; median weight 3.2 kg [IQR, 2.8-3.6]) from 198 ELSO centers, who were placed on ECMO. By 28 days of life, 731 (20.7%) had died. The median H24 Pa o2 was 85 mm Hg (IQR, 60-142). We found that both hypoxia (Pa o2 < 60 mm Hg) and moderate hyperoxia (Pa o2 201-300 mm Hg) were associated with greater adjusted odds ratio (aOR [95% CI]) of 28-day mortality, respectively: aOR 1.44 (95% CI, 1.08-1.93), p = 0.016, and aOR 1.49 (95% CI, 1.01-2.19), p value equals to 0.045., Conclusions: Early hypoxia or moderate hyperoxia after ECMO initiation are each associated with greater odds of 28-day mortality among neonates requiring ECMO for respiratory failure., Competing Interests: Dr. Tonna is supported by a Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23 HL141596). Dr. Tonna is the Chair of the Registry Committee of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Dr. Moscatelli is a consultant for Air Liquide Santé International as a member of the advisory board on the use of inhaled nitric oxide for cardiothoracic indications. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Background: Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a numerical measure of the variation in the size of circulating red blood cells. Recently, there is increasing interest in the role of RDW as a biomarker for inflammatory states and as a prognostication tool for a wide range of clinical manifestations. The predictive power of RDW on mortality among patients receiving mechanical circulatory support remains largely unknown., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 281 VA-ECMO patients at a tertiary referral academic hospital from 2009 to 2019 was performed. RDW was dichotomized with RDW-Low <14.5% and RDW-High ≥14.5%. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between RDW and the clinical outcomes after adjusting for additional confounders., Results: 281 patients were included in the analysis. There were 121 patients (43%) in the RDW-Low group and 160 patients (57%) in the RDW-High group. Survival to ECMO decannulation [RDW-H: 58% versus RDW-L: 67%, p = 0.07] were similar between the two groups. Patients in RDW-H group had higher 30-days mortality (RDW-H: 67.5% vs RDW-L: 39.7%, p < 0.001) and 1 year mortality (RDW-H: 79.4% vs RDW-L: 52.9%, p < 0.001) compared to patients in the RDW-L group. After adjusting for confounders, Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that patients with high RDW had increased odds of mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0, p < 0.01) and 1 year (hazard ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8, p < 0.01) compared to patients with low RDW., Conclusions: Among patients receiving mechanical circulatory support with VA-ECMO, a higher RDW was independently associated with increased 30-days and 1-year mortality. RDW may serve as a simple biomarker that can be quickly obtained to help provide risk stratification and predict survival for patients receiving VA-ECMO., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Financial support for this work was provided solely by the institutions and departments named in the author affiliations.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between the temporal transitions in heart rhythms during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest., Methods: This was an analysis of the prospectively collected databases in 3 academic hospitals in northern and central Taiwan. Adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest transported by emergency medical service between 2015 and 2022 were included. Favorable neurological recovery and survival to hospital discharge were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Time-specific heart rhythm shockability was defined as the probability of shockable rhythms at a particular time point during CPR. The temporal changes in the time-specific heart rhythm shockability were calculated by group-based trajectory modeling. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between the trajectory group and outcomes. Subgroup analyses examined the effects of extracorporeal CPR in different trajectories., Results: The study comprised 2118 patients. The median patient age was 69.1 years, and 1376 (65.0%) patients were male. Three distinct trajectories were identified: high-shockability (52 patients; 2.5%), intermediate-shockability (262 patients; 12.4%), and low-shockability (1804 patients; 85.2%) trajectories. The median proportion of shockable rhythms over the course of CPR for the 3 trajectories was 81.7% (interquartile range, 73.2%-100.0%), 26.7% (interquartile range, 16.7%-37.5%), and 0% (interquartile range, 0%-0%), respectively. The multivariable analysis indicated both intermediate- and high-shockability trajectories were associated with favorable neurological recovery (intermediate-shockability: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.98 [95% CI, 2.34-10.59]; high-shockability: aOR, 5.40 [95% CI, 2.03-14.32]) and survival (intermediate-shockability: aOR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.44-4.18]; high-shockability: aOR, 2.76 [95% CI, 1.20-6.38]). The subgroup analysis further indicated extracorporeal CPR was significantly associated with favorable neurological outcomes (aOR, 4.06 [95% CI, 1.11-14.81]) only in the intermediate-shockability trajectory., Conclusions: Heart rhythm shockability trajectories were associated with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes, which may be a supplementary factor in guiding the allocation of medical resources, such as extracorporeal CPR., Competing Interests: None.

Background: Systemic hemodynamics and specific ventilator settings have been shown to predict survival during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). How the right heart (the right ventricle and pulmonary artery) affect survival during venoarterial ECMO is unknown. We aimed to identify the relationship between right heart function with mortality and the duration of ECMO support., Methods: Cardiac ECMO runs in adults from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry between 2010 and 2022 were queried. Right heart function was quantified via pulmonary artery pulse pressure (PAPP) for pre-ECMO and on-ECMO periods. A multivariable model was adjusted for modified Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions stage, age, sex, and concurrent clinical data (ie, pulmonary vasodilators and systemic pulse pressure). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality., Results: A total of 4442 ECMO runs met inclusion criteria and had documentation of hemodynamic and illness severity variables. The mortality rate was 55%; nonsurvivors were more likely to be older, have a worse Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions stage, and have longer pre-ECMO endotracheal intubation times ( P <0.05 for all) than survivors. Increasing PAPP from pre-ECMO to on-ECMO time (ΔPAPP) was associated with reduced mortality per 2 mm Hg increase (odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]; P =0.002). Higher on-ECMO PAPP was associated with mortality reduction across quartiles with the greatest reduction in the third PAPP quartile (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.63-0.90]; P =0.002) and longer time on ECMO per 10 mm Hg (beta, 15 [95% CI, 7.7-21]; P <0.001)., Conclusions: Early on-ECMO right heart function and interval improvement from pre-ECMO values were associated with mortality reduction during cardiac ECMO. Incorporation of right heart metrics into risk prediction models should be considered., Competing Interests: Dr Tonna is the Chair-elect of the Registry Committee of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). Dr Brodie has been on the medical advisory boards for Abiomed, Xenios, Medtronic, Inspira, and Cellenkos. He is the President-elect of ELSO and the Chair of the Executive Committee of the International ECMO Network (ECMONet), and he writes for UpToDate.

Introduction: A feared complication of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is cardiac arrest (CA). Even if return of spontaneous circulation is achieved, cardiogenic shock (CS) is common. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) supports patients with CS and is often used in conjunction with an Impella device (2.5 and CP) to off-load the left ventricle, although limited evidence supports this approach., Methods: The goal of this study was to determine whether a mortality difference was observed in VA-ECMO alone versus VA-ECMO with Impella (ECPELLA) in patients with CS from AMI and CA. A retrospective chart review of 50 patients with AMI-CS and CA and were supported with VA-ECMO ( n  = 34) or ECPELLA ( n  = 16) was performed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6-months from VA-ECMO or Impella implantation. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and complication rates between both cohorts and intensive care unit data., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar, except patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were more likely to be in the VA-ECMO group ( p  = 0.044). The ECPELLA cohort had significantly worse survival after VA-ECMO (SAVE) score ( p  = 0.032). Six-month all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the cohorts, even when adjusting for SAVE score. Secondary outcomes were notable for an increased rate of minor complications without an increased rate of major complications in the ECPELLA group., Conclusions: Randomized trials are needed to determine if a mortality difference exists between VA-ECMO and ECPELLA platforms in patients with AMI complicated by CA and CS., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Joyce Wald, DO: Speaker for Impulse Dynamics, Advisory Board for Boston Scientific, and Abiomed. Marisa Cevasco, MD: Consultant for Abiomed. Christian Bermudez, MD: Advisory Board for Abiomed, Breeth, and Abbot. Salim Olia, PhD: Consultant for Magenta Medical and Boston Scientific. The remaining authors have no disclosures.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly applied over recent decades to treat severe cardiogenic shock and acute lung failure and cardiac arrest of various causes. Acute intoxication with therapeutic substances or other chemical substances can cause severe cardiogenic shock or even cardiac arrest. The purpose of this study was to conduct a qualitative systematic review of ECMO use in intoxication and poisoning. We searched the PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science databases from January 1971 to December 2021 and selected appropriate studies according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria to evaluate the role of ECMO in intoxication and poisoning systematically. Survival at hospital discharge was examined to describe the outcome. The search resulted in 365 publications after removing duplicates. In total, 190 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 145 articles from 1985 to 2021 were examined in our final qualitative analysis. A total of 539 (100%) patients were included (mean age: 30.9 ± 16.6 years), with a distribution of n  = 64 (11.9%) cases with venovenous (vv) ECMO, n  = 218 (40.4%) cases with venoarterial (va) ECMO, and n  = 257 (47.7%) cases with cardiac arrest and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Survival at hospital discharge was 61.0% for all patients, 68.8% for vaECMO, 75% for vvECMO, and 50.9% for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. When used and reported, ECMO seems to be a valid tool for adult and pediatric patients suffering intoxication from various pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical substances due to a high survival rate at hospital discharge., Competing Interests: F.B., C.B. and G.T. are shareholders of ResuSciTec GmbH, Freiburg, Germany. C.B. and G.T. are part-time employees of ResuSciTec GmbH, Freiburg, Germany. The other authors report no conflict of interest regarding this work., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To examine trends in utilization and outcomes among patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring prolonged venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support., Design: Retrospective observational cohort study., Setting: Adult patients in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry., Patients: Thirteen thousand six hundred eighty-one patients that required ECMO for the support of ARDS between January 2012 and December 2022., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Mortality while supported with VV ECMO and survival to hospital discharge based on ECMO duration were examined utilizing multivariable logistic regression. Among the 13,681 patients supported with VV ECMO, 4,040 (29.5%) were supported for greater than or equal to 21 days and 975 (7.1%) for greater than or equal to 50 days. Patients supported with prolonged VV ECMO were less likely to be discharged alive from the hospital compared with those with short duration of support (46.5% vs. 59.7%; p < 0.001). However, among patients supported with VV ECMO greater than or equal to 21 days, duration of extracorporeal life support was not significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; p = 0.87 and adjusted OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02; p = 0.48). Even in those supported with VV ECMO for at least 120 days (n = 113), 52 (46.0%) of these patients were ultimately discharged alive from the hospital., Conclusions: Prolonged VV ECMO support of ARDS has increased and accounts for a substantial portion of cases. Among patients that survive for greater than or equal to 21 days while receiving VV ECMO support, duration is not predictive of survival to hospital discharge and clinical recovery may occur even after very prolonged VV ECMO support., Competing Interests: Dr. Rackley received funding from Inspira and Roche. Dr. King received funding from Merck, United Therapeutics, Altavant, and Janssen. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: Comparing the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) on outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in China. The benefits of ECPR over CCPR in patients with IHCA remain controversial., Design: This article analyzed data from the BASeline Investigation of In-hospital Cardiac Arrest (BASIC-IHCA) study, which consecutively enrolled patients with IHCA from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Patients who received ECPR were selected as the case group and matched with patients who received CCPR as the control group by propensity score at a ratio of 1:4. A parallel questionnaire survey of participating hospitals was conducted, to collect data on ECPR cases from January 1, 2021 to November 30, 2021. The primary outcome was survival to discharge or 30-day survival., Setting: We included 39 hospitals across 31 provinces in China., Patients: Patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation and without contraindications to ECPR were selected from the BASIC-IHCA database. Patients older than 75 years, not witnessed, or with cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration less than 10 min were excluded., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: A total of 4853 patients met the inclusion criteria before matching, with 34 undergoing ECPR (median age, 56.5 yr; 67.65% male) and 4819 underwent CCPR (median age, 59 yr; 64.52% male). There were 132 patients receiving CCPR and 33 patients receiving ECPR who were eventually matched. The ECPR group had significantly higher survival rates at discharge or 30-day survival (21.21% vs. 7.58%, p = 0.048). The ECPR group had significantly lower mortality rates (hazard ratio 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.91) than the CCPR group at discharge or 30 days. Besides the BASIC-IHCA study, the volume of ECPR implementations and the survival rate of patients with ECPR (29.4% vs. 10.4%. p = 0.004) in participating hospitals significantly improved., Conclusions: ECPR may be beneficial compared with CCPR for patient survival after IHCA and should be considered for eligible patients with IHCA., Competing Interests: The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Objectives: We investigated donors with brain death on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, a clinically challenging situation due to hemodynamic instability frequently encountered in these donors, which may threaten organ function., Materials and Methods: We described our experience with 15 utilized brain death donors on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, consecutively admit-ted in our intensive care unit (which is a referral center for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) from 2018 to 2023. We investigated whether utilization rate for brain death donors on extracor-poreal membrane oxygenation was affected by the introduction of a monitoring hemodynamic schedule during the 6-hour observation period., Results: The utilization rate was 78% in period 1 and 88% in period 2. No statistically significant differences were observed for age, sex, and the incidence of cardiovascular risk factors between period 1 and period 2. The cause of death was postanoxic encephalopathy in all but 1 donor, who was on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory respiratory failure and developed cerebral hemorrhage. Number of organs per donor was 2 in all the population with no significant differences between period 1 and period 2. In the overall population, 15 livers were transplanted, 11 kidneys, 1 heart, and 1 pancreas. In our population, left ventricular ejection fraction severe dysfunction was observed in all donors except in the donor on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; the organ from this donor was deemed unsuitable for transplant. No significant differences were observed in hemodynamic data between the 2 subgroups. All donors were on 2 vasoactive drugs (norepinephrine and vasopressin) to maintain adequate perfusion (mean arterial pressure >60 mm Hg). Three donors were oligoanuric (due to postarrest acute renal failure)., Concluisons: In our series of 15 consecutive brain death donors on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a strict monitoring regimen during the 6-hour obser-vation period was associated with a higher utilization rate.

Background:  Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) is related with poor outcome, especially in Germany. We aimed to analyze whether changes in vv-ECMO therapy during the pandemic were observed and lead to changes in the outcome of vv-ECMO patients., Methods:  All patients undergoing vv-ECMO support for COVID-19 between 2020 and 2021 in a single center ( n  = 75) were retrospectively analyzed. Weaning from vv-ECMO and in-hospital mortality were defined as primary and peri-interventional adverse events as secondary endpoints of the study., Results:  During the study period, four infective waves were observed in Germany. Patients were assigned correspondingly to four study groups: ECMO implantation between March 2020 and September 2020: first wave ( n  = 11); October 2020 to February 2021: second wave ( n  = 23); March 2021 to July 2021: third wave ( n  = 25); and August 2021 to December 2021: fourth wave ( n  = 20). Preferred cannulation technique changed within the second wave from femoro-femoral to femoro-jugular access ( p  < 0.01) and awake ECMO was implemented. Mean ECMO run time increased by more than 300% from 10.9 ± 9.6 (first wave) to 44.9 ± 47.0 days (fourth wave). Weaning of patients was achieved in less than 20% in the first wave but increased to approximately 40% since the second one. Furthermore, we observed a continuous numerically decrease of in-hospital mortality from 81.8 to 57.9% ( p  = 0.61)., Conclusion:  Preference for femoro-jugular cannulation and awake ECMO combined with preexisting expertise and patient selection are considered to be associated with increased duration of ECMO support and numerically improved ECMO weaning and in-hospital mortality., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the association between driving pressure (ΔP) and 90-day mortality in patients following lung transplantation (LTx) in patients who developed primary graft dysfunction (PGD)., Methods: This prospective, observational study involved consecutive patients who, following LTx, were admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2022 to January 2023. Patients were separated into two groups according to ΔP at time of admission (i.e., low, ≤15 cmH 2 O or high, >15 cmH 2 O). Postoperative outcomes were compared between groups., Results: In total, 104 patients were involved in the study, and of these, 69 were included in the low ΔP group and 35 in the high ΔP group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 90-day mortality showed a statistically significant difference between groups with survival better in the low ΔP group compared with the high ΔP group. According to Cox proportional regression model, the variables independently associated with 90-day mortality were ΔP and pneumonia. Significantly more patients in the high ΔP group than the low ΔP group had PGD grade 3 (PGD3), pneumonia, required tracheostomy, and had prolonged postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) time, postoperative ventilator time, and ICU stay., Conclusions: Driving pressure appears to have the ability to predict PGD3 and 90-day mortality of patients following LTx. Further studies are required to confirm our results., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of variables, including thrombocytopenia and the amount of platelet transfusion, for predicting survival in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) recipients. Additionally, we aimed to identify the predictors of increased transfusion requirement during venoarterial ECMO support., Methods: All patients who received venoarterial ECMO between December 2008 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were used to evaluate in-hospital mortality according to variables including thrombocytopenia and daily average of platelet concentrate transfusion. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors for transfusion requirements., Results: Analysis of 218 patients demonstrated severe thrombocytopenia as an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio = 2.840, 95% CI: 1.593-5.063, P < .001), along with age, pre-ECMO cardiac arrest, and pH. In contrast, the amount of platelet transfusion was not associated with in-hospital mortality. Multiple variables, including the type of indication for ECMO were associated with transfusion requirements., Conclusion: Our findings identified severe thrombocytopenia as an independent prognostic factor of in-hospital mortality. However, daily average platelet transfusion was not associated with survival outcomes. Additionally, our study identified predictive variables of increased transfusion requirements., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to explore the impact of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on mortality during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Previous studies investigated the prognostic impact of RBC transfusion during ECMO on the risk of mortality, but no meta-analysis has been published before., Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched for papers published up to 13 December 2021, using the MeSH terms "ECMO", "'Erythrocytes", and "Mortality" to identify meta-analyses. Total or daily RBC transfusion during ECMO and mortality were examined., Results: The random-effect model was used. Eight studies (794 patients, including 354 dead) were included. The total volume of RBC was associated with higher mortality standardized weighted difference (SWD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.06,-0.18, p = .006; I2 = 79.7%, P heterogeneity = 0.001). The daily volume of RBC was associated with higher mortality (SWD = -0.77, 95% CI: -1.11,-0.42, p < .001; I2 = 65.7%, P heterogeneity = 0.020). The total volume of RBC was associated with mortality for venovenous (VV) (SWD = -0.72, 95% CI: -1.23, -0.20, p = .006) but not venoarterial ECMO ( p = .126) or when reported together ( p = .089). The daily volume of RBC was associated with mortality for VV (SWD = -0.72, 95% CI: -1.18, -0.26, p = 0.002; I2 = 0.0%, P heterogeneity = 0.642) and venoarterial (SWD = -0.95, 95% CI: -1.32, -0.57, p < .001) ECMO, but not when reported together ( p = .067). The sensitivity analysis suggested the robustness of the results., Conclusion: When considering the total and daily volumes of RBC transfusion during ECMO, the patients who survived received smaller total and daily volumes of RBC transfusion. This meta-analysis suggests that RBC transfusion might be associated with a higher risk of mortality during ECMO., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Enteral nutrition (EN) is one method of nutrition support for children and adolescents receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy, and there are no guidelines for its use in this population. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether EN is effective and safe in children supported by ECMO. We searched the Cochrane Library database, MEDLINE, and Embase on Ovid in March 2023 to identify studies that evaluated children and adolescents who received ECMO and were treated with EN. Random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the odds of mortality with EN compared with parenteral nutrition (PN). A total of 14 studies were included in this review with 1650 patients (796 received EN). The median duration of ECMO was 5-10 days, and the median EN initiation time ranged from 23 h to 7 days. The pooled results suggest no significant difference in mortality with EN compared with PN (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.05; I 2  = 26%). Exclusion of the only study that reported an increase in mortality resulted in a borderline significant reduction in mortality with EN (OR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-1.00; I 2  = 26%). The predictors of EN were male sex, older age, heavier weight, greater height, cardiac diagnosis, longer duration of ECMO, and use of venovenous ECMO. Most studies suggest no correlation between EN and complications. EN use in children and adolescents who receive ECMO does not appear to be associated with increased mortality compared with PN and was safe in terms of intestinal complications and feeding intolerance., (© 2024 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.)

Objective: This study aimed to examine the changes in absolute value and decline rate of early serum cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in neonates who received veno-arterial (V-A) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support therapy within the first week of life., Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical data and laboratory test results of 18 neonates who underwent V-A ECMO support within one week of birth, from July 2021 to June 2023, using the electronic medical record system. These patients were categorized into survival and death groups. Comparative analyses of the absolute values and decline rates of cTnT and NT-proBNP were made between the groups at baseline, and at 24, 48, and 72 h post-ECMO initiation., Results: Out of the 18 neonates, 12 survived (survival rate: 66.7%), while 6 succumbed. The survival group exhibited significantly lower absolute values of cTnT and NT-proBNP than the death group, and their decline rates were significantly higher. Notably, all neonates without an early decline in cTnT and NT-proBNP levels were in the death group., Conclusion: The early changes in the absolute value and decline rate of serum cTnT and NT-proBNP in neonates undergoing V-A ECMO may serve as predictors of their prognosis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This cohort study was performed to explore the influence of intensive care unit (ICU) quality on in-hospital mortality of veno-venous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-supported patients in China. The study involved all V-V ECMO-supported patients in 318 of 1700 tertiary hospitals from 2017 to 2019, using data from the National Clinical Improvement System and China National Critical Care Quality Control Center. ICU quality was assessed by quality control indicators and capacity parameters. Among the 2563 V-V ECMO-supported patients in 318 hospitals, a significant correlation was found between ECMO-related complications and prognosis. The reintubation rate within 48 hours after extubation and the total ICU mortality rate were independent risk factors for higher in-hospital mortality of V-V ECMO-supported patients (cutoff: 1.5% and 7.0%; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.48 and 1.04-1.45; odds ratios: 1.25 and 1.23; P = 0.012 and P = 0.015, respectively). Meanwhile, the V-V ECMO center volume was a protective factor (cutoff of ≥ 50 cases within the 3-year study period; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.83, odds ratio: 0.69, P = 0.0001). The subgroup analysis of 864 patients in 11 high-volume centers further strengthened these findings. Thus, ICU quality may play an important role in improving the prognosis of V-V ECMO-supported patients., (© 2023. Higher Education Press.)

Objective: Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 patients who met a low-risk inclusion criteria for veno-venous extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) with those who did not meet criteria due to higher risk but were subsequently cannulated., Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study that included adult patients who were placed on VV ECMO for COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at a tertiary care academic medical center. The primary outcome was the association between the low-risk criteria and mortality. The patients met the criteria if they met EOLIA severe ARDS criteria, no absolute contraindications (age > 60 years, BMI > 55 kg/m 2 , mechanical ventilation (MV) duration >7 days, irreversible neurologic damage, chronic lung disease, active malignancy, or advanced multiorgan dysfunction), and had three or less relative contraindications (age > 50 years, BMI > 45 kg/m 2 , comorbidities, MV duration > 4 days, acute kidney injury, receiving vasopressors, hospital LOS > 14 days, or COVID-19 diagnosis > 4 weeks)., Results: Sixty-five patients were included from March 2020 through March 2022. Patients were stratified into low-risk or high-risk categories. The median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 7 and the median PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 44 at the time of ECMO cannulation. The in-hospital mortality was 47.8% in the low-risk group and 69.0% in the high-risk group ( p  = 0.096)., Conclusion: There was not a statistically significant difference in survival between low-risk patients and high-risk patients; however, there was a trend toward higher survival in the lower-risk group., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objectives: Patients after the Norwood procedure are prone to postoperative instability. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can help to overcome short-term organ failure. This retrospective single-centre study examines ECMO weaning, hospital discharge and long-term survival after ECMO therapy between Norwood and bidirectional Glenn palliation as well as risk factors for mortality., Methods: In our institution, over 450 Norwood procedures have been performed. Since the introduction of ECMO therapy, 306 Norwood operations took place between 2007 and 2022, involving ECMO in 59 cases before bidirectional Glenn. In 48.3% of cases, ECMO was initiated intraoperatively post-Norwood. Patient outcomes were tracked and mortality risk factors were analysed using uni- and multivariable testing., Results: ECMO therapy after Norwood (median duration: 5 days; range 0-17 days) saw 31.0% installed under CPR. Weaning was achieved in 46 children (78.0%), with 55.9% discharged home after a median of 45 (36-66) days. Late death occurred in 3 patients after 27, 234 and 1541 days. Currently, 30 children are in a median 4.8 year (3.4-7.7) follow-up. At the time of inquiry, 1 patient awaits bidirectional Glenn, 6 are at stage II palliation, Fontan was completed in 22 and 1 was lost to follow-up post-Norwood. Risk factor analysis revealed dialysis (P < 0.001), cerebral lesions (P = 0.026), longer ECMO duration (P = 0.002), cardiac indication and lower body weight (P = 0.038) as mortality-increasing factors. The 10-year mortality probability after ECMO therapy was 48.5% (95% CI 36.5-62.9%)., Conclusions: ECMO therapy in critically ill patients after the Norwood operation may significantly improve survival of a patient cohort otherwise forfeited and give the opportunity for successful future-stage operations., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Perioperative heparin-free anticoagulation extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for lung transplantation is rarely reported., Objective: To evaluate the impact of a heparin-free strategy on bleeding and thrombotic events, blood transfusion, and coagulation function during the early perioperative period and on prognosis, and to observe its effect on different ECMO types., Design: A retrospective cohort study., Methods: Data were collected from 324 lung transplantation patients undergoing early perioperative heparin-free ECMO between August 2017 and July 2022. Clinical data including perioperative bleeding and thrombotic events, blood product transfusion, coagulation indicators and 1-year survival were analysed., Results: Patients were divided in venovenous (VV; n  = 251), venoarterial (VA; n  = 40) and venovenous-arterial (VV-A; n  = 33) groups. The VV group had the lowest intraoperative bleeding and thoracic drainage within 24 h postoperatively. Vein thrombosis occurred in 30.2% of patients within 10 days postoperatively or 1 week after ECMO withdrawal, and no significant difference was found among the three groups. Double lung transplantation, increased intraoperative bleeding, and increased postoperative drainage were associated with vein thrombosis. Except for acute myocardial infarction in one patient, no other serious thrombotic events occurred. The VV-ECMO group had the lowest demand for blood transfusion. The highest prothrombin time and the lowest fibrinogen levels were observed in the VA group during ECMO run, while the highest platelet counts were found in the VV group. Both intraoperative bleeding and thoracic drainage within 24 h postoperatively were independent predictors for 1-year survival, and no thrombosis-related deaths occurred., Conclusion: Short-term heparin-free anticoagulation, particularly VV-ECMO, did not result in serious thrombotic events or thrombosis-related deaths, indicating that it is a safe and feasible strategy for perioperative ECMO in lung transplantation.

Purpose: Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) is the treatment for patients with chronic thromboembolic disease. In the immediate postoperative period, some patients may still experience life-threatening complications such as reperfusion lung injury, airway bleeding, and persistent pulmonary hypertension with consequent right ventricular dysfunction. These issues may require support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to recovery or lung transplantation. This study aims to analyze our series of PTEs that require ECMO., Methods: A descriptive and retrospective analysis of all PTE performed at the Favaloro Foundation University Hospital was conducted between March 2013 and December 2023., Results: A total of 42 patients underwent PTE with a median age of 47 years (interquartile range: 26-76). The incidence of patients with ECMO was 26.6%, of which 53.6% were veno-venous (VV) ECMO. Preoperatively, a low cardiac index (CI), high right and left filling pressures, and high total pulmonary vascular resistances (PVRs) were associated with ECMO with a statistically significant relationship. The hospital mortality was 11.9%, and the mortality in the ECMO group was 45.5%, with a statistically significant relationship. Veno-arterial ECMO has a worse prognosis than VV ECMO., Conclusions: Preoperatively, a low CI, high right and left filling pressures, and high total PVRs were associated with ECMO after PTE.

Racial/ethnic disparities in mortality were observed during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic, but investigations examining the association between race/ethnicity and mortality during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are limited. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study using the 2020 national inpatient sample. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of mortality in patients of difference race/ethnicity while controlling for confounders. There was a significant association between race/ethnicity and in-hospital mortality ( p < 0.001). Hispanic patients had significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared with White patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.67, p < 0.001). Black patients and patients of other races did not have significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared with White patients (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.66-1.02, p = 0.07 and OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.92-1.57, p = 0.18). Other variables that had a significant association with mortality included age, insurance type, Charlson comorbidity index, all patient-refined severity of illness, and receipt of care in a low-volume ECMO center (all p < 0.001). Further studies are needed to understand causes of disparities in ECMO mortality., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2023.)

Objectives: A recent study from Germany found that survival after respiratory extracorporeal life support (ECLS) was lower among patients 10-20 years old than 20-30 years old. The objective of this study was to compare survival between teenage and young adult patients who receive respiratory ECLS., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry, an international prospective quality improvement database., Patients: All patients ages 16-30 years cannulated for respiratory indications from 1990 to 2020 were included. Patients were divided into two groups, teens (16-19 yr old) and young adults (20-30 yr old)., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Primary outcome was survival to discharge. Variables were considered for the multivariate logistic regression model if there was both a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) and a clinically meaningful absolute difference between the groups. A total of 5,751 patients were included, of whom 1,653 (29%) were teens and 4,098 (71%) were young adults. Survival to discharge was higher in young adults than teens, 69% versus 63% (p < 0.001). Severity of illness was higher among teens; however, survival within each stratum defined by Pao2/Fio2 ratio was higher in young adults than in teens. Use of venoarterial ECLS was higher in teens than in young adults, 15% versus 7%, respectively. Teens were more likely to receive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and this therapy was associated with a longer time from admission to ECLS initiation. After adjusting for variables that differ significantly between the groups, the odds ratio for survival in young adults compared with teens was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.004-1.3)., Conclusions: In this large multicenter retrospective study, mortality was higher in teens than in young adults who received respiratory ECLS. This difference persisted after adjusting for multiple variables and the mechanism underlying these findings remains unclear., Competing Interests: Dr. Thiagarajan’s institution received funding from the U.S. Department of Defense; he received funding from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Background: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is increasingly used in the treatment of infarct-related cardiogenic shock despite a lack of evidence regarding its effect on mortality., Methods: In this multicenter trial, patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock for whom early revascularization was planned were randomly assigned to receive early ECLS plus usual medical treatment (ECLS group) or usual medical treatment alone (control group). The primary outcome was death from any cause at 30 days. Safety outcomes included bleeding, stroke, and peripheral vascular complications warranting interventional or surgical therapy., Results: A total of 420 patients underwent randomization, and 417 patients were included in final analyses. At 30 days, death from any cause had occurred in 100 of 209 patients (47.8%) in the ECLS group and in 102 of 208 patients (49.0%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.19; P = 0.81). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 7 days (interquartile range, 4 to 12) in the ECLS group and 5 days (interquartile range, 3 to 9) in the control group (median difference, 1 day; 95% CI, 0 to 2). The safety outcome consisting of moderate or severe bleeding occurred in 23.4% of the patients in the ECLS group and in 9.6% of those in the control group (relative risk, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.95); peripheral vascular complications warranting intervention occurred in 11.0% and 3.8%, respectively (relative risk, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.31 to 6.25)., Conclusions: In patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with planned early revascularization, the risk of death from any cause at the 30-day follow-up was not lower among the patients who received ECLS therapy than among those who received medical therapy alone. (Funded by the Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation and others; ECLS-SHOCK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03637205.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)