Search

Background Two years into the pandemic, clinicians do not have access to a standardized measurement of SARS-CoV-2 viral load (VL) that allows for VL comparison across clinical specimens and different assays. Reliable VL measurement in diverse respiratory specimens, over time, and in response to treatments such as remdesivir (RDV), could better inform treatment and prevention. Methods To investigate the use of a standardized VL assay in respiratory specimens, we enrolled patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Providence, RI, with/without RDV exposure; collected serial samples from 4 compartments (nasopharyngeal-NP, nasal-NA, oropharyngeal-OP, saliva-SA) in 3 visits during the 1st week of hospitalization; and characterized SARS-CoV-2 VL using a ChromaCode HDPCR™ quantitative research use only assay, calibrated to the first World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS). Linear mixed effects models and associated regression coefficients were used to analyze inter-compartmental VL differences at enrollment, over time, and with/without RDV. Results Of 35 participants (60% male; 70% White, 14% Hispanic/Latino, 49% RDV exposure), all had visit 1 samples (median hospital day 1, IQR 0-2; pre-RDV for those exposed); 80% visit 2 samples (median hospital day 2, IQR 1-8); and 37% visit 3 samples (median hospital day 4, IQR 3-7). Overall, 38 NP, 67 NA, 57 OP, and 67 SA samples were collected. Mean log VLs (Log10IU/mL) differed by compartment at visit 1 (NP 6.3, NA 4.9, OP 4.1, SA 5.6, p=0.0001) and significantly decreased over time in all compartments (p< 0.04 for all comparisons). Log VL change over time was not significantly different between compartments or between people treated/not treated with RDV. Conclusion We successfully measured respiratory intercompartmental SARS-CoV-2 VL differences among hospitalized patients using a standardized assay calibrated to the WHO IS. Dissemination of standardized VL measurement methods will allow accurate VL comparisons across assay types quantified in IU/mL and improve assessment of the impact of COVID-19 treatments. Inter-compartmental VL differences at baseline may indicate sampling variability or different viral burden. RDV did not appear to accelerate viral decay. Disclosures Curt Beckwith, MD, Gilead Sciences, Inc: Grant/Research Support Jon Steingrimsson, PhD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support Angela Caliendo, MD, PhD, ChromaCode: Advisor/Consultant|Danaher/Cepheid: Advisor/Consultant|First Light: Advisor/Consultant|Hologic: Grant/Research Support|ID Connect: Advisor/Consultant|Quidel: Advisor/Consultant|Visby: Advisor/Consultant Rami Kantor, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support.

To estimate the effects of a brief prenatal behavioral intervention on risk behaviors for maternal cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection.Women were screened with CMV serology during prenatal care before 20 weeks of gestation and followed for at least 10 weeks. Women without serologic evidence of primary CMV infection were approached. Participants were apprised of serostatus and then randomized 2:1 to either a brief behavioral intervention during their prenatal care visit or to standard care (a brochure). The 7- to 10-minute in-office intervention included a video and hygiene education using motivational interviewing. Participants were then given a reminder calendar to take home and weekly text message reminders. The primary outcome was change in behavioral compliance score on a scale of 0-100. Secondary outcomes included process evaluation and domains of behavior change. A sample size of 180 participants was planned to compare the behavioral compliance score change of at least 15% between intervention and control groups with 80% power and 2.5% two-sided α.From April 2013 to October 2014, 197 women were randomized. One hundred eighty-seven (96%) had outcome data available. Mean gestational age at screening and randomization was 9 4/7 and 13 6/7 weeks of gestation, respectively. Primary outcome assessment occurred at a mean of 28 4/7 weeks of gestation. Baseline behavioral compliance scores increased modestly in the intervention group (mean: 7-point increase from 80.7 to 87.7, 95% CI 2.4-5.9) compared with the comparison group (mean: 4-point increase from 79.7 to 84.1, 95% CI 5.9-8.4; mean difference in change score: 3.0, 95% CI, 0.8-5.2; P=.007). Those in the intervention group reported change in risk perception related to perceived severity and susceptibility, self-efficacy, and perceived norms (P.05 for all).A brief behavioral intervention delivered in the prenatal care setting was modestly effective at changing behaviors related to CMV infection risk.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01819519.