Search

Immunogenicity; Proteogenomics Inmunogenicidad; Proteogenómica Immunogenicitat; Proteogenòmica Purpose: Tumor antigens are central to antitumor immunity. Recent evidence suggests that peptides from noncanonical (nonC) aberrantly translated proteins can be presented on HLA-I by tumor cells. Here, we investigated the immunogenicity of nonC tumor HLA-I ligands (nonC-TL) to better understand their contribution to cancer immunosurveillance and their therapeutic applicability. Experimental Design: Peptides presented on HLA-I were identified in 9 patient-derived tumor cell lines from melanoma, gynecologic, and head and neck cancer through proteogenomics. A total of 507 candidate tumor antigens, including nonC-TL, neoantigens, cancer-germline, or melanocyte differentiation antigens, were tested for T-cell recognition of preexisting responses in patients with cancer. Donor peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) were in vitro sensitized against 170 selected nonC-TL to isolate antigen-specific T-cell receptors (TCR) and evaluate their therapeutic potential. Results: We found no recognition of the 507 nonC-TL tested by autologous ex vivo expanded tumor-reactive T-cell cultures while the same cultures demonstrated reactivity to mutated, cancer-germline, or melanocyte differentiation antigens. However, in vitro sensitization of donor PBL against 170 selected nonC-TL, led to the identification of TCRs specific to three nonC-TL, two of which mapped to the 5′ UTR regions of HOXC13 and ZKSCAN1, and one mapping to a noncoding spliced variant of C5orf22C. T cells targeting these nonC-TL recognized cancer cell lines naturally presenting their corresponding antigens. Expression of the three immunogenic nonC-TL was shared across tumor types and barely or not detected in normal cells. Conclusions: Our findings predict a limited contribution of nonC-TL to cancer immunosurveillance but demonstrate they may be attractive novel targets for widely applicable immunotherapies. We thank the patients for their participation in this study, Steven A. Rosenberg for providing valuable reagents and support for NGS studies, R. Pujol for helpful scientific discussion, J. Gonzalez for bioinformatics support, CRG/UPF Flow Cytometry Unit for assistance with cell sorting, and CRG/UPF and IRB Proteomics Units for technical support. A. Gros and this work were funded by the Comprehensive Program of Cancer Immunotherapy & Immunology II (CAIMI-II) supported by the BBVA Foundation (53/2021), Institute Carlos III (MS15/00058 and PI17/01085), AECC (IDEAS197PORT), and La Fundació La Marató de TV3 (201919–30). We thank CERCA Programme / Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support. M. Lozano-Rabella was supported by the Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) (2018FI_B 00946). A. Garcia-Garijo was supported by Generalitat PERIS award (SLT017/20/000131). A. Yuste-Estevanez was supported by the Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) (2021 FI_B 00365). J. Palomero was supported by the Beatriu de Pinós programme (BP 2018), cofounded by the Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR) and European Union's Horizon 2020.

Includes a large list of all the peptides and details of the HLA-I ligands identified at =30 ALC score

Supplementary Figure 1. Validation of HLA-I ligand tumor antigen candidates with synthetic peptides Supplementary Figure 2. Validation of selected HLA-I ligand tumor antigen candidates identified in Mel-1 and Mel-3 with isotope-labeled peptides Supplementary Figure 3. Frequency of nonC peptides detected in HLA-I. Supplementary Fig. 4. HLA-I allele binding motif of all patients included in the study. Supplementary Figure 5. A fraction of nonC-TL can be detected in publicly available immunopeptidomics datasets from human tumor biopsies Supplementary Figure 6. Evaluation of pre-existing T-cell responses to candidate tumor antigens in cancer patients Supplementary Figure 7. Enrichment of antigen-specific T cells from cancer patients by flow cytometry-based sorting. Supplementary Figure 8. Deconvolution of peptide pools containing recognized CGA or melanoma-associated antigens. Supplementary Figure 9. Functional avidity and specificity of neoantigen-specific T cells isolated from cancer patients. Supplementary Figure 10. HLA restriction element and recognition of autologous tumor cell lines by antigen-specific T cells isolated from cancer patients. SupplementaryFigure 11. Genomic location of the three immunogenic nonC-TL identified through IVS. Supplementary Figure 12. Recognition of the predicted ORFs encoding the immunogenic nonC-TL by TCR transduced cells. Supplementary Figure 13. Loss of recognition of TCL transfected with Cas9-sgRNA targeting the predicted 5’U-HOXC13 ORF. Supplementary Figure 14. Assessment of expression and translation of the immunogenic nonC-TL in human healthy cells. Supplementary Figure 15. NonC-TL are the main source of candidate tumor antigens identified by proteogenomics but tumor-reactive T cells preferentially recognize neoantigens derived from NSM.

Show patient characteristics and relevant experimental information

Purpose:Atezolizumab [anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)] selectively targets PD-L1 to block its interaction with receptors programmed death 1 and B7.1, thereby reinvigorating antitumor T-cell activity. We evaluated the long-term safety and activity of atezolizumab, along with biological correlates of clinical activity endpoints, in a cohort of patients with melanoma in an ongoing phase Ia study (NCT01375842).Patients and Methods:Patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma were enrolled to receive atezolizumab 0.1 to 20 mg/kg or ≥10 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Primary study objectives were safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives included investigator-assessed efficacy measures; pharmacodynamic and predictive biomarkers of antitumor activity were explored.Results:Forty-five patients were enrolled and were evaluable for safety. Most treatment-related adverse events (AE) were grade 1/2 (60%). Fatigue (44%), pruritus (20%), pyrexia (18%), and rash (18%) were the most common treatment-related AEs of any grade. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Overall response rate was 30% among 43 efficacy- evaluable patients, with a median duration of response of 62 months [95% CI, 35–not estimable (NE)]. Clinically meaningful long-term survival was observed, with a median overall survival of 23 months (95% CI, 9–66). Baseline biomarkers of tumor immunity [PD-L1 expression on immune cells, T effector (Teff), and antigen presentation gene signatures) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were associated with improved response, progression-free survival, and overall survival.Conclusions:Atezolizumab was well tolerated, with durable responses and survival in patients with melanoma. PD-L1 expression, TMB, and Teff signatures may indicate improved benefit with atezolizumab in these patients.

Supplementary Data from Activity and Resistance of a Brain-Permeable Paradox Breaker BRAF Inhibitor in Melanoma Brain Metastasis

Figure S1. Flowchart of study selection process with ICIs treatment. Figure S2. Flowchart of study selection process with TAs treatment. Figure S3. Overall Survival comparing HPD with non-HPD in patients with progression disease as best response in the ICIs and TAs cohorts ( RECIST 1.1 progression disease Landmark Analysis). Figure S4. Overall Survival in second line (a) and third (b) setting HPD vs non-HPD progressors by RECIST criteria in ICIs cohort. Figure S5. Concordance between RECIST and TGR criteria in ICIs cohort. Table S1. Computed tomography (CT) acquisition protocol parameters. Table S2. Clinical variables in patients treated with TAs. Table S3. Multivariate model in patients with progression disease as best response in ICIs group (using TGR).

The therapeutic benefit of approved BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) in patients with brain metastatic BRAF V600E/K–mutated melanoma is limited and transient. Resistance largely occurs through the restoration of MAPK signaling via paradoxical BRAF activation, highlighting the need for more effective therapeutic options. Aiming to address this clinical challenge, we characterized the activity of a potent, brain-penetrant paradox breaker BRAFi (compound 1a, C1a) as first-line therapy and following progression upon treatment with approved BRAFi and BRAFi/MEKi therapies. C1a activity was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in melanoma cell lines and patient-derived models of BRAF V600E–mutant melanoma brain metastases following relapse after treatment with BRAFi/MEKi. C1a showed superior efficacy compared with approved BRAFi in both subcutaneous and brain metastatic models. Importantly, C1a manifested potent and prolonged antitumor activity even in models that progressed on BRAFi/MEKi treatment. Analysis of mechanisms of resistance to C1a revealed MAPK reactivation under drug treatment as the predominant resistance-driving event in both subcutaneous and intracranial tumors. Specifically, BRAF kinase domain duplication was identified as a frequently occurring driver of resistance to C1a. Combination therapies of C1a and anti–PD-1 antibody proved to significantly reduce disease recurrence. Collectively, these preclinical studies validate the outstanding antitumor activity of C1a in brain metastasis, support clinical investigation of this agent in patients pretreated with BRAFi/MEKi, unveil genetic drivers of tumor escape from C1a, and identify a combinatorial treatment that achieves long-lasting responses.Significance:A brain-penetrant BRAF inhibitor demonstrates potent activity in brain metastatic melanoma, even upon relapse following standard BRAF inhibitor therapy, supporting further investigation into its clinical utility.

Figures S1-S4

Purpose:Most hyperprogression disease (HPD) definitions are based on tumor growth rate (TGR). However, there is still no consensus on how to evaluate this phenomenon.Patients and Methods:We investigated two independent cohorts of patients with advanced solid tumors treated in phase I trials with (i) programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 antibodies in monotherapy or combination and (ii) targeted agents (TA) in unapproved indications. A Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1–based definition of hyperprogression was developed. The primary endpoint was the assessment of the rate of HPD in patients treated with ICIs or TAs using both criteria (RECIST and TGR) and the impact on overall survival (OS) in patients who achieved PD as best response.Results:Among 270 evaluable patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, 29 PD-1/PD-L1–treated patients (10.7%) had HPD by RECIST definition. This group had a significantly lower OS (median of 5.23 months; 95% CI, 3.97–6.45) when compared with the non-HPD progressor group (median, 7.33 months; 95% CI, 4.53–10.12; HR = 1.73, 95% CI, 1.05–2.85; P = 0.04). In a subset of 221 evaluable patients, 14 (6.3%) were categorized as HPD using TGR criteria, differences in median OS (mOS) between this group (mOS 4.2 months; 95% IC, 2.07–6.33) and non-HPD progressors (n = 44) by TGR criteria (mOS 6.27 months; 95% CI, 3.88–8.67) were not statistically significant (HR 1.4, 95% IC, 0.70–2.77; P = 0.346). Among 239 evaluable patients treated with TAs, 26 (10.9%) were classified as having HPD by RECIST and 14 using TGR criteria in a subset of patients. No differences in OS were observed between HPD and non-HPD progressors treated with TAs.Conclusions:HPD measured by TGR or by RECIST was observed in both cohorts of patients; however, in our series, there was an impact on survival only in the immune-checkpoint inhibitor cohort when evaluated by RECIST. We propose a new way to capture HPD using RECIST criteria that is intuitive and easy to use in daily clinical practice.

Tables S1-S4

PURPOSE Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 1,833 patients received nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks (916 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (917 patients) for ≤ 1 year. After random assignment, patients were stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and stage. Dual primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) in randomly assigned patients and in the tumor PD-L1 expression-level < 1% subgroup. RESULTS At a minimum follow-up of approximately 23.7 months, there was no significant difference between treatment groups for RFS in the all-randomly assigned patient population (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.09; P = .269) or in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1% (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14). In all patients, 24-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 0.4% of patients in the combination group and in no nivolumab-treated patients. CONCLUSION Nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks did not improve RFS versus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab showed efficacy consistent with previous adjuvant studies in a population resembling current practice using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition, reaffirming nivolumab as a standard of care for melanoma adjuvant treatment.

PURPOSE No approved targeted therapy for the treatment of patients with neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog ( NRAS)–mutant melanoma is currently available. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase Ib escalation/expansion study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02974725 ), the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of naporafenib (LXH254), a BRAF/CRAF protein kinases inhibitor, were explored in combination with trametinib in patients with advanced/metastatic KRAS- or BRAF-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (escalation arm) or NRAS-mutant melanoma (escalation and expansion arms). RESULTS Thirty-six and 30 patients were enrolled in escalation and expansion, respectively. During escalation, six patients reported grade ≥3 dose-limiting toxicities, including dermatitis acneiform (n = 2), maculopapular rash (n = 2), increased lipase (n = 1), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (n = 1). The recommended doses for expansion were naporafenib 200 mg twice a day plus trametinib 1 mg once daily and naporafenib 400 mg twice a day plus trametinib 0.5 mg once daily. During expansion, all 30 patients experienced a treatment-related adverse event, the most common being rash (80%, n = 24), blood creatine phosphokinase increased, diarrhea, and nausea (30%, n = 9 each). In expansion, the objective response rate, median duration of response, and median progression-free survival were 46.7% (95% CI, 21.3 to 73.4; 7 of 15 patients), 3.75 (95% CI, 1.97 to not estimable [NE]) months, and 5.52 months, respectively, in patients treated with naporafenib 200 mg twice a day plus trametinib 1 mg once daily, and 13.3% (95% CI, 1.7 to 40.5; 2 of 15 patients), 3.75 (95% CI, 2.04 to NE) months, and 4.21 months, respectively, in patients treated with naporafenib 400 mg twice a day plus trametinib 0.5 mg once daily. CONCLUSION Naporafenib plus trametinib showed promising preliminary antitumor activity in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma. Prophylactic strategies aimed to lower the incidence of skin-related events are under investigation.

Combination treatment with BRAF (BRAFi) plus MEK inhibitors (MEKi) has demonstrated survival benefit in patients with advanced melanoma harboring activating BRAF mutations. Previous preclinical studies suggested that an intermittent dosing of these drugs could delay the emergence of resistance. Contrary to expectations, the first published phase 2 randomized study comparing continuous versus intermittent schedule of dabrafenib (BRAFi) plus trametinib (MEKi) demonstrated a detrimental effect of the “on−off” schedule. Here we report confirmatory data from the Phase II randomized open-label clinical trial comparing the antitumoral activity of the standard schedule versus an intermittent combination of vemurafenib (BRAFi) plus cobimetinib (MEKi) in advanced BRAF mutant melanoma patients (NCT02583516). The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of progression free survival (PFS) improvement. Our results show that the antitumor activity of the experimental intermittent schedule of vemurafenib plus cobimetinib is not superior to the standard continuous schedule. Detection of BRAF mutation in cell free tumor DNA has prognostic value for survival and its dynamics has an excellent correlation with clinical response, but not with progression. NGS analysis demonstrated de novo mutations in resistant cases., Whether intermittent strategies of delivering drugs can improve cancer patients survival is still unclear. Here, the authors reports the results of a randomized phase II clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens (continuous and intermittent) of vemurafenib and cobimetinib combination as first-line treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic advanced melanoma with BRAFV600 mutation

Mª del Carmen Álamo,1 Sebastian Ochenduszko,2 Guillermo Crespo,3 Mónica Corral,4 Juana Oramas,5 Pilar Sancho,6 Javier Medina,7 Fernando Garicano,8 Pedro López,9 Begoña Campos Balea,10 Analia Rodríguez Garzotto,11 Eva Muñoz-Couselo12,13 1Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain; 2Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain; 3Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain; 4Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain; 5Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; 6Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; 7Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain; 8Oncology Department, Hospital de Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain; 9Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario General de Jaén, Jaén, Spain; 10Oncology Department, Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain; 11Medical Department and Strategy, Roche S.A, Madrid, Spain; 12Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; 13VHIO Vall d’Hebron Institute on Oncology, Barcelona, SpainCorrespondence: Eva Muñoz-CouseloOncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron, 119, Barcelona, 08035, SpainEmail emunoz@vhio.netBackground: The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors delays the onset of resistance and provides more sustained and dramatic responses in comparison with a BRAF inhibitor in monotherapy. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination therapy with vemurafenib/cobimetinib in terms of durability, and to describe differential characteristics in patients associated to durable responses in real-world settings.Patients and Methods: Retrospective, observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involving 41 patients with advanced melanoma harboring a BRAFV600 mutation who initiated a combination therapy with vemurafenib/cobimetinib between May 2018 and March 2019. Participants were differentiated regarding the durability of the response: durable (complete response, CR, or a partial response, PR, for at least 12 months) and non-durable (stable disease, SD, progressive disease, PD, or CR/PR < 12 months). Secondary endpoints included treatment adherence, labor productivity, anxiety/depression, and safety profile.Results: During the combination therapy, 12 patients (29.3%) had a CR, 19 a PR (46.3%), 5 showed SD (12.2%), and 5 had PD. A total of 12 patients (29.3%) were considered as achieving a durable response and 29 (70.7%) as a non-durable one. Practically all sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were similar between patients. Body mass index was the only differential factor (with higher body mass index achieving a non-durable response). The treatment adherence was 100% in patients with durable response and 66.7% in those with non-durable.Conclusion: The combination treatment with vemurafenib/cobimetinib results in an important impact on long-term survival, leading to a steady CR in one-third of the patients.Keywords: vemurafenib, cobimetinib, BRAF, metastatic melanoma, durable response, clinical practice

Glycolysis; Melanomas; Targeted therapy Glucólisis; Melanomas; Terapia dirigida Glucòlisi; Melanomes; Teràpia dirigida NRAS-mutated melanoma lacks a specific line of treatment. Metabolic reprogramming is considered a novel target to control cancer; however, NRAS-oncogene contribution to this cancer hallmark is mostly unknown. Here, we show that NRASQ61-mutated melanomas specific metabolic settings mediate cell sensitivity to sorafenib upon metabolic stress. Mechanistically, these cells are dependent on glucose metabolism, in which glucose deprivation promotes a switch from CRAF to BRAF signaling. This scenario contributes to cell survival and sustains glucose metabolism through BRAF-mediated phosphorylation of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase-2/3 (PFKFB2/PFKFB3). In turn, this favors the allosteric activation of phosphofructokinase-1 (PFK1), generating a feedback loop that couples glycolytic flux and the RAS signaling pathway. An in vivo treatment of NRASQ61 mutant melanomas, including patient-derived xenografts, with 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) and sorafenib effectively inhibits tumor growth. Thus, we provide evidence for NRAS-oncogene contributions to metabolic rewiring and a proof-of-principle for the treatment of NRASQ61-mutated melanoma combining metabolic stress (glycolysis inhibitors) and previously approved drugs, such as sorafenib. This work was funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and co-funded by European Union (ERDF/ESF, “A way to make Europe”/“Investing in your future”) PI14/0375-Fondos FEDER J.A.R., PI17/00043-Fondos FEDER; J.A.R., PI20/0384-Fondos FEDER; J.A.R., Euronanomed2-ISCIII (AC16/00019)-Fondos FEDER; J.A.R., Asociación Española Contra el Cancer (AECC-GCB15152978SOEN) (supported P.G.M., K.M.); J.A.R., Ramón Areces Foundation (supported K.M. and research); J.A.R. (PI17/00412)-Fondos FEDER; R.B., A.M., A.N.S. We thank A. Zorzano’s laboratory for technical assistance and performance of Seahorse technology.

Tumor antigens are central to antitumor immunity. Recent evidence suggests that peptides from non-canonical (nonC) aberrantly translated proteins can be presented on HLA-I by tumor cells. Here, we investigated the immunogenicity of nonC tumor HLA-I ligands (nonC-TL) to better understand their contribution to cancer immunosurveillance and their therapeutic applicability. Using proteogenomics, we identified 517 nonC-TL from 9 patients with melanoma, gynecological, and head and neck cancer. We found no recognition of the 507 nonC-TL tested by autologousex vivoexpanded tumor reactive T-cell cultures while the same cultures demonstrated reactivity to mutated, cancer-germline, or melanocyte differentiation antigens. However,in vitrosensitization of donor peripheral blood lymphocytes against 170 selected nonC-TL, led to the identification of T-cell receptors (TCRs) specific to three nonC-TL, two of which mapped to the 5’ UTR regions of HOXC13 and ZKSCAN1, and one mapping to a non-coding spliced variant of C5orf22C. T cells targeting these nonC-TL recognized cancer cell lines naturally presenting their corresponding antigens. Expression of the three immunogenic nonC-TL was shared across tumor types and barely or not detected in normal cells. Our findings predict a limited contribution of nonC-TL to cancer immunosurveillance but demonstrate they may be attractive novel targets for widely applicable immunotherapies.

Dabrafenib; Drug interaction; Pharmacokinetics Dabrafenib; Interacción de fármacos; Farmacocinética Dabrafenib; Interacció de fàrmacs; Farmacocinètica Dabrafenib is an oral BRAF kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of various BRAF V600 mutation–positive solid tumors. In vitro observations suggesting cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A induction and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) inhibition prompted us to evaluate the effect of dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam 3 mg (CYP3A substrate) and rosuvastatin 10 mg (OATP1B1/1B3 substrate) in a clinical phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence study in patients with BRAF V600 mutation–positive tumors. Repeat dabrafenib dosing resulted in a 2.56-fold increase in rosuvastatin maximum observed concentration (Cmax), an earlier time to Cmax, but only a 7% increase in area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (predose) extrapolated to infinite time. Midazolam Cmax and AUC extrapolated to infinite time decreased by 47% and 65%, respectively, with little effect on time to Cmax. No new safety findings were reported. Exposure of drugs that are CYP3A4 substrates is likely to decrease when coadministered with dabrafenib. Concentrations of medicinal products that are sensitive OATP1B1/1B3 substrates may increase during the absorption phase. This study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline; dabrafenib and trametinib are assets of Novartis AG as of March 2, 2015.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with unmet medical needs. Several studies have proved that high levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) at diagnosis of TNBC confer better prognosis and patients respond better to specific chemotherapies. Nonetheless, current evidence suggests that only 15% of TNBC patients have very high levels of TILs, and another 15% lacks TILs. One possible reason to explain why patients have low TILs at diagnosis is that lymphocytes might be deactivated by an immune checkpoint in local lymph nodes, provoking their retention in there as they are unresponsive to other immune stimuli. We have identified 15 high TILs (≥50%) and 20 low TILs (≤5%) TNBC patients with localised tumour (T1c-T2N0M0) and compared the protein expression of five immune checkpoints in lymph nodes. We have also performed a customised 50-immune gene NanoString expression panel, the NanoString 360 Breast Cancer panel, and whole exome sequencing for mutation and neoantigen load analyses. In low TILs, we observed higher expression of CTLA-4 in local lymph nodes, which could explain why lymphocytes get retained in there and do not migrate to tumour. These patients have also higher neoantigen load and higher expression of B7.H3 and B7.H4 in the tumour. In high TILs, we observed more PD-L1+ tumour cells and more expanded humoral response. These results could provide a strategy to revert low tumour immune infiltration at diagnosis of TNBC, improving their prognosis. This project was supported by a grant from INTHEOS Foundation, thanks to the donation received from Pompadour, and from FERO Foundation. Peer Reviewed "Article signat per 18 autors/es: Ángela Quintana, Vicente Peg, Aleix Prat, Teresa Moliné, Guillermo Villacampa, Laia Paré, Patricia Galván, Rodrigo Dientsmann, Peter Schmid, Giuseppe Curigliano, Eva Muñoz-Couselo, José Perez-Garcia, Merce Marti, Juan Blanco-Heredia, Carla dos Anjos, Miguel Vazquez, Leticia De Mattos-Arruda, Javier Cortés"

Background Reliable predictive imaging markers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors are needed. Purpose To develop and validate a pretreatment CT-based radiomics signature to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, a radiomics signature was developed in patients with advanced solid tumors (including breast, cervix, gastrointestinal) treated with anti-programmed cell death-1 or programmed cell death ligand-1 monotherapy from August 2012 to May 2018 (cohort 1). This was tested in patients with bladder and lung cancer (cohorts 2 and 3). Radiomics variables were extracted from all metastases delineated at pretreatment CT and selected by using an elastic-net model. A regression model combined radiomics and clinical variables with response as the end point. Biologic validation of the radiomics score with RNA profiling of cytotoxic cells (cohort 4) was assessed with Mann-Whitney analysis. Results The radiomics signature was developed in 85 patients (cohort 1: mean age, 58 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 43 men) and tested on 46 patients (cohort 2: mean age, 70 years ± 12; 37 men) and 47 patients (cohort 3: mean age, 64 years ± 11; 40 men). Biologic validation was performed in a further cohort of 20 patients (cohort 4: mean age, 60 years ± 13; 14 men). The radiomics signature was associated with clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (area under the curve [AUC], 0.70; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.77

Considerables avances se han vivido en los últimos años, tanto en el conocimiento de la biología del melanoma como en el desarrollo de nuevas terapias médicas que han acreditado ser muy activas, capaces no sólo de inducir respuestas clínicas y radiológicas, sino también de controlar la enfermedad a largo plazo. Más aún, los resultados actualizados de los ensayos fase 3 randomizado en pacientes con enfermedad avanzada o de alto riesgo, han hecho a muchos investigadores especular sobre la posibilidad de que se haya conseguido incluso curar a algunos pacientes. No se puede obviar que los resultados actuales se han precedido de numerosos años de fracasos en la investigación médica con quimioterapia y bioquimioterapia, de varias décadas de investigación y refinamiento en las técnicas quirúrgicas que demostraron ser curativas para la enfermedad localizada y, literalmente, de centurias de perplejidad, ante una enfermedad desconcertante por su comportamiento y agresividad clínica. Presentamos una breve revisión histórica del conocimiento del melanoma, desde una perspectiva médico quirúrgica, con el objetivo que despertar en el lector el interés por avanzar en el conocimiento del pasado y sobre todo del futuro de una patología tumoral, que hasta hace muy poco no tenía opciones terapéuticas, pero que ha abierto las puertas para la innovación terapéutica en oncología.

In recent years, immunotherapy has become an important pillar of cancer treatment, with high response rates regardless of tumour histology or baseline mutations. However, immune activation associated with check-point inhibitors is not selective and a large variety of immune-related adverse events have been associated with anti-PD1, anti-PD-1/L-1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents. Though diagnosis and treatment of these toxicities have been established according to the recommendations from clinical trials and in line with the autoimmune disorders that they mimic, increasing real-world data is coming up showing that these adverse events may have differential characteristics and management, especially in terms of the use of corticoids, second-line treatments, salvage therapy for life-threatening cases and reintroduction of immunotherapy. Herein we present a comprehensive review of current recommendations and real-world data on the main immune-related adverse events of immunotherapy.

Baseline LDH, derived neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are associated with outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). We hypothesized whether dynamic shifts in LDH, dNLR and incidence of irAEs may impact the prognosis of MM patients treated with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 as single agents. Retrospective analysis of medical charts from MM patients with prospective monitoring of dNLR, LDH values and irAE incidence. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients switching from either high dNLR (≥2.5) to low dNLR (HR: 0.14; 0.03–0.74; p = 0.02) or high LDH (≥1.5 × ULN) to low LDH levels (HR: 0.08; 0.01–0.68; p = 0.02) had significantly better OS than those with high dNLR or LDH scores at the end of cycle 2. Longer OS was also observed in patients developing irAEs ≥ grade 2 as compared to no irAEs (HR: 0.2; 0.05–0.89; p = 0.03). We found that major shifts in dNLR and LDH measures from baseline to cycle 2 measures and shifts from baseline to cycle 2 are significantly associated with OS in MM patients receiving single agent anti-PD1 therapy. Laboratory changes and clinical variables may help optimize prognostic estimates.

Background The phase Ib KEYNOTE-173 study was conducted to assess the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in high-risk, early-stage, non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients and methods Six pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy regimens were evaluated (cohorts A–F). All cohorts received a pembrolizumab 200-mg run-in dose (cycle 1), then eight cycles of pembrolizumab in combination with a taxane with or without carboplatin for 12 weeks, and then doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for an additional 12 weeks before surgery. Primary end points were safety and recommended phase II dose (RP2D); secondary end points were pathological complete response (pCR) rate, objective response rate, and event-free and overall survival. Exploratory end points were the relationship between outcome and potential biomarkers, such as tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (combined positive score) and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels (sTILs). Results Sixty patients were enrolled between 18 February 2016, and 28 February 2017. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 22 patients, most commonly febrile neutropenia (n = 10 across cohorts). Four cohorts (B, C, D, F) did not meet the RP2D threshold; two cohorts did (A, E). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia (73%). Immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 18 patients (30%) and were grade ≥3 in six patients (10%). The pCR rate (ypT0/Tis ypN0) across all cohorts was 60% (range 49%–71%). Twelve-month event-free and overall survival rates ranged from 80% to 100% across cohorts (100% for four cohorts). Higher pre-treatment PD-L1 combined positive score, and pre- and on-treatment sTILs were significantly associated with higher pCR rates (P = 0.0127, 0.0059, and 0.0085, respectively). Conclusion Combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pembrolizumab for high-risk, early-stage TNBC showed manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity. In an exploratory analysis, the pCR rate showed a positive correlation with tumor PD-L1 expression and sTIL levels. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02622074.

Metastatic melanoma has been historically associated with a poor prognosis; however, the therapeutic landscape has experimented and impressive change in the last years due to rapid advances in the immunotherapy field. The first immunotherapy treatment for metastatic melanoma was ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), which showed a significant improvement of overall survival compared to chemotherapy. However, in 2015 anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab shown an improved overall survival, progression-free survival and response rate compared to ipilimumab with either a better toxicity profile. Moreover, other immunotherapy combinations and target therapies, such as BRAF and MEK inhibitors combinations, have shown better outcomes than ipilimumab. Thus, ipilimumab seems to have no role in frontline metastatic melanoma treatment and even their role in second line is being less frequent due to clinical efficacy of those other treatments. Actually, the role of ipilimumab in second line after anti-PD-1 progression is not clear although there is clinical evidence for its use. Here, we report two cases of treatment response with ipilimumab in second line setting after receiving anti-PD-1 combination. So that, ipilimumab may have a role after progression to an anti-PD-1 treatment.

The therapeutic benefit of approved BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) in patients with brain metastatic BRAF V600E/K–mutated melanoma is limited and transient. Resistance largely occurs through the restoration of MAPK signaling via paradoxical BRAF activation, highlighting the need for more effective therapeutic options. Aiming to address this clinical challenge, we characterized the activity of a potent, brain-penetrant paradox breaker BRAFi (compound 1a, C1a) as first-line therapy and following progression upon treatment with approved BRAFi and BRAFi/MEKi therapies. C1a activity was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in melanoma cell lines and patient-derived models of BRAF V600E–mutant melanoma brain metastases following relapse after treatment with BRAFi/MEKi. C1a showed superior efficacy compared with approved BRAFi in both subcutaneous and brain metastatic models. Importantly, C1a manifested potent and prolonged antitumor activity even in models that progressed on BRAFi/MEKi treatment. Analysis of mechanisms of resistance to C1a revealed MAPK reactivation under drug treatment as the predominant resistance-driving event in both subcutaneous and intracranial tumors. Specifically, BRAF kinase domain duplication was identified as a frequently occurring driver of resistance to C1a. Combination therapies of C1a and anti–PD-1 antibody proved to significantly reduce disease recurrence. Collectively, these preclinical studies validate the outstanding antitumor activity of C1a in brain metastasis, support clinical investigation of this agent in patients pretreated with BRAFi/MEKi, unveil genetic drivers of tumor escape from C1a, and identify a combinatorial treatment that achieves long-lasting responses. Significance: A brain-penetrant BRAF inhibitor demonstrates potent activity in brain metastatic melanoma, even upon relapse following standard BRAF inhibitor therapy, supporting further investigation into its clinical utility.

BackgroundIn the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 trial, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab+chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab monotherapy resulted in a statistically significant improvement in pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival, compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with early-stage TNBC. In the phase 1b KEYNOTE-173 (NCT02622074) trial—another neoadjuvant pembrolizumab+chemotherapy trial—we evaluated TNBC biopsy samples at baseline and collected after one cycle of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, before the initiation of chemotherapy, to explore the features within the TME at both timepoints that might be potentially predictive of clinical response and the effects of a single cycle of pembrolizumab on cell populations within the TME.MethodsTwenty paired samples (baseline and obtained following one cycle of pembrolizumab before the initiation of chemotherapy) were included. Multiplex immunohistochemistry analyzed deconvoluted cell fractions by spatial localization (tumor compartment, stromal compartment, or total tumor) using three 6-plex panels: T cell (CD3/CD8/FoxP3/Ki67/granzyme B/PD-1), myeloid cell (CD68/CD163/MHCII/arginase/CD33/CD11c), and natural killer cell (CD16/CD56/CD11b/CD20/CD3/CD45). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was used to assess associations between immune subsets and pCR. Analyses were descriptive, with top-ranked findings reported, and were deemed hypothesis generating; no claims of statistical significance are made.ResultsAt baseline, 6 of 75 evaluated immune subsets (counting different compartments) showed 95% CIs of AUROC not crossing 0.5 with pCR. These include some myeloid cell populations within the tumor compartment (AUROC, 95% CI), specifically CD11c+ (macrophage and dendritic cell [DC]: 0.85, 0.63–1.00), CD11c+/MHCII+/CD163–/CD68– (DC: 0.76, 0.53–0.99), CD11c+/MHCII–/CD163–/CD68– (nonactivated/immature DC: 0.8, 0.54-1.00), and CD11c+/CD163+ (M2 macrophage: 0.77, 0.55–0.99). Other associations with pCR included baseline CD11c+/MHCII–/CD163–/CD68– (nonactivated/immature DC) within the total tumor (AUROC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.51–1.00) and the baseline ratio of CD11c/CD3 within the tumor compartment (AUROC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.52–0.98). Although T-cell associations were relatively weak, specific CD8 subsets, especially CD8+/granzyme B+/Ki67+, showed a trend toward association. Negative correlations between change from baseline and baseline values were observed; therefore, baseline detrending was applied to change from baseline values. One immune subset showed a negative association trend between change from baseline and pCR after baseline detrending: CD163+/MHCII+ (DC3) within the stroma (AUROC, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.0–0.42).ConclusionsAlthough the sample size in this exploratory analysis was small (n=20), myeloid cell populations within the tumor compartment at baseline show a promising association trend, as evaluated by AUROC, with pCR after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab+chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC. Changes in immune subsets following one cycle of pembrolizumab were not strongly associated with pCR.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrialsgov, NCT02622074Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol and all amendments were approved by the relevant institutional review board or ethics committee at each study site.ConsentAll patients provided written informed consent to participate in the clinical trial.

BackgroundIntratumoral immunotherapies are being tested in different solid tumors. They trigger local and systemic responses.1 2 BO-112 is a double stranded RNA nanoplexed with polyethyleneimine (PEI), which mimics a viral infection and mobilizes the immune system.In preclinical models and in a first in human clinical trial BO-112 activated dendritic cells, induced CD-8 infiltration, apoptosis and enhancement of immunogenic cell death and achieved an objective response in 2 out of 10 patients with melanoma with primary resistance to antiPD-1.3 4MethodsIn this phase 2 study, BO-112 plus pembrolizumab is evaluated in patients with advanced melanoma, who have developed progressive disease while on or within 12 weeks after anti-PD1/PD-L1 based therapy (either as first line or as adjuvant treatment). BO-112 is administered intratumorally once weekly in 1 to 8 tumor lesions, total dose 1 to 2 mg, for the first 7 weeks and thereafter every three weeks; pembrolizumab 200 mg is administered intravenously every three weeks. Overall response rate (ORR) is analyzed as primary endpoint by independent reviewer. Secondary objectives include disease control rate (DCR), duration of response and progression free survival (PFS); response assessment is done by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST; in addition, CD-8 and PD-L1 IHC, NGS, itRECIST and radiomics signatures are prospectively assessed. Key eligibility criteria include cutaneous or mucosal melanoma with known BRAF status; at least one lesion RECIST 1.1 measurable and amenable for IT injection. Enrollment has been completed on 26th August.ResultsWith 26 evaluable patients with a first response assessment, seven have progressive disease (PD), five have partial response (PR) and fourteen patients show stable disease (SD). Preliminary ORR is 19.2% and DCR is 73.1% at week 8. Three patients with PR at week 8 have undergone a second assessment at week 16, with further decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) in both injected and non-injected lesions. Three out of five patients with SD and a second assessment maintain SD, showing a decrease in SOD in two cases (figure 1). In addition, two patients with only skin lesions have a pathological complete response. CD8 and PD-L1 have increased in 8 and 7 out of 13 patients with paired biopsies, being related with clinical benefit (figure 2).Abstract 961 Figure 1Swimmer plot, efficacy data for evaluable patients undergoing at least one response assessmentAbstract 961 Figure 2Immunohistochemistry data for CPS and CD8 data from paired biopsiesConclusionsDespite these data being preliminary, there is a trend for benefit in terms of ORR and also in long lasting stable diseases. BO-112 is able to increase PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and increase CD8-T cell infiltrates.AcknowledgementsMerck, Pivotal SLU, Quibim radiomics, Pangaea laboratories, all participating sites and patientsTrial RegistrationNCT04570332ReferencesAznar MA, Planelles L, Perez-Olivares M, et al. Immunotherapeutic effects of intratumoral nanoplexed poly I:C. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 May 2;7(1):116.5. Hamid O, Ismail R, Puzanov I. Intratumoral immunotherapy-update 2019. The Oncologist 2020;25:e423–438.Márquez-Rodas I, Longo F, Rodríguez-Ruiz M, et al. Intratumoral nanoplexed poly I:C BO-112 in combination with systemic anti-PD-1 for patients with anti-PD-1-refractory tumors. Sci Transl Med 2020 Oct 14;12(565):eabb0391.Kalbasi A, Tariveranmoshabad M, Hakimi K, Kremer S, et al. A. Uncoupling interferon signaling and antigen presentation to overcome immunotherapy resistance due to JAK1 loss in melanoma. Sci Transl Med 2020 Oct 14;12(565):eabb0152.Ethics ApprovalThe study obtained ethics approval by Spanish Health Agency (AEMPS), on 11th December 2020, and French Health Agency (ANSM) on 27th January 2021; study obtained approval from two Ethics Committee: Vall D’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain on 7th December 2020 (number 467), and Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, CPP 20.11.10.38825 on 11th February 2021.For each study patient, written informed consent is obtained prior to any protocol-related activities. As part of this procedure, the principal investigator or one of his/her associates must explain orally and in writing the nature, duration, and purpose of the study, and the action of the study drug in such a manner that the patient is aware of the potential risks, inconveniences, or adverse effects that may occur. They should be informed that the patient may withdraw from the study at any time. They will receive all information that is required by the regulatory authorities and ICH guidelines. The ICF has been signed by the patient and a copy provided to them.ConsentN/A

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury (ICPi-AKI) has emerged as an important toxicity among patients with cancer.MethodsWe collected data on 429 patients with ICPi-AKI and 429 control patients who received ICPis contemporaneously but who did not develop ICPi-AKI from 30 sites in 10 countries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of ICPi-AKI and its recovery. A multivariable Cox model was used to estimate the effect of ICPi rechallenge versus no rechallenge on survival following ICPi-AKI.ResultsICPi-AKI occurred at a median of 16 weeks (IQR 8–32) following ICPi initiation. Lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and extrarenal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were each associated with a higher risk of ICPi-AKI. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis was the most common lesion on kidney biopsy (125/151 biopsied patients [82.7%]). Renal recovery occurred in 276 patients (64.3%) at a median of 7 weeks (IQR 3–10) following ICPi-AKI. Treatment with corticosteroids within 14 days following ICPi-AKI diagnosis was associated with higher odds of renal recovery (adjusted OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.58 to 4.41). Among patients treated with corticosteroids, early initiation of corticosteroids (within 3 days of ICPi-AKI) was associated with a higher odds of renal recovery compared with later initiation (more than 3 days following ICPi-AKI) (adjusted OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.16 to 3.79). Of 121 patients rechallenged, 20 (16.5%) developed recurrent ICPi-AKI. There was no difference in survival among patients rechallenged versus those not rechallenged following ICPi-AKI.ConclusionsPatients who developed ICPi-AKI were more likely to have impaired renal function at baseline, use a PPI, and have extrarenal irAEs. Two-thirds of patients had renal recovery following ICPi-AKI. Treatment with corticosteroids was associated with improved renal recovery.

NRAS-mutated melanoma lacks a specific line of treatment. Metabolic reprogramming is considered a novel target to control cancer; however, NRAS-oncogene contribution to this cancer hallmark is mostly unknown. Here, we show that NRAS

Immunotherapy; Phase 1 trials; Prognostic model Inmunoterapia; Ensayos de fase 1; Modelo pronóstico Immunoteràpia; Assajos de fase 1; Model pronòstic Purpose Patient selection in phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1t) continues to be a challenge. The aim of this study was to develop a user-friendly prognostic calculator for predicting overall survival (OS) outcomes in patients to be included in Ph1t with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or targeted agents (TAs) based on clinical parameters assessed at baseline. Methods Using a training cohort with consecutive patients from the VHIO phase 1 unit, we constructed a prognostic model to predict median OS (mOS) as a primary endpoint and 3-month (3m) OS rate as a secondary endpoint. The model was validated in an internal cohort after temporal data splitting and represented as a web application. Results We recruited 799 patients (training and validation sets, 558 and 241, respectively). Median follow-up was 21.2 months (m), mOS was 10.2 m (95% CI, 9.3–12.7) for ICIs cohort and 7.7 m (95% CI, 6.6–8.6) for TAs cohort. In the multivariable analysis, six prognostic variables were independently associated with OS – ECOG, number of metastatic sites, presence of liver metastases, derived neutrophils/(leukocytes minus neutrophils) ratio [dNLR], albumin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. The phase 1 prognostic online (PIPO) calculator showed adequate discrimination and calibration performance for OS, with C-statistics of 0.71 (95% CI 0.64–0.78) in the validation set. The overall accuracy of the model for 3m OS prediction was 87.2% (95% CI 85%–90%). Conclusions PIPO is a user-friendly objective and interactive tool to calculate specific survival probabilities for each patient before enrolment in a Ph1t. The tool is available at https://pipo.vhio.net/. The research leading to these results has received funding from “la Caixa” Foundation (LCF/PR/CE07/50610001). Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities and equipment. This work was supported by the Accelerator Award (UpSMART) from Fundacion Científica – Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer (FC -AECC)/ Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) /Cancer Research United Kingdom (CRUK).

Alejandro Garcia-Alvarez, Carolina Ortiz, Eva Muñoz-Couselo Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Medical Oncology Department, Melanoma and Other Skin Tumors Unit, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, 08035, SpainCorrespondence: Eva Muñoz-CouseloVall d’Hebron University Hospital, Medical Oncology Department, Melanoma and Other Skin Tumors Unit, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Pg Vall d’Hebron, 119-129, Barcelona, 08035, SpainTel +93 4894350Fax +93 2746781Email emunoz@vhebron.netAbstract: Melanoma is the deadliest cutaneous cancer. Activating mutations in NRAS are found in 20% of melanomas. NRAS-mutant melanoma is more aggressive and, therefore, has poorer outcomes, compared to non-NRAS-mutant melanoma. Despite promising preclinical data, to date immune checkpoint inhibitors remain the standard of care for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic NRAS melanoma. Data for efficacy of immunotherapy for NRAS melanoma mainly come from retrospective cohorts with divergent conclusions. MEK inhibitors have been the most developed targeted therapy approach. Although associated with an increase in progression-free survival, MEK inhibitors do not provide any benefit in terms of overall survival. Combination strategies with PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway and CDK4/6 inhibitors seem to increase MEK inhibitors’ benefit. Nevertheless, results from clinical trials are still prelaminar. A greater comprehension of the biology and intracellular interactions of NRAS-mutant melanoma will outline novel impactful strategies which could improve prognosis of these subgroup of patients.Keywords: metastatic melanoma, NRAS mutation, MEK inhibitor, immunotherapy

Background:Increasing quantities of stromal TILs (sTILs) are associated with higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates with conventional chemo in early-stage TNBC. We evaluated the association between sTILs and PD-L1 expression with response to pembro+chemo as NAT for TNBC in the KEYNOTE-173 trial (NCT02622074). Methods: sTILs were quantified using light microscopy of H&E-stained slides from pretreatment and on-treatment (during first 3 weeks of pembro monotherapy) tumor biopsies by a pathologist blind to response data. Pretreatment PD-L1 expression was assessed using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay and reported as combined positive score (CPS). Endpoints were pCR rate by ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/Tis ypN0 and objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1) after the first 4 cycles of NAT (taxane±carboplatin+pembro) by MRI. sTILs and PD-L1 CPS were evaluated as continuous variables. Association between sTILs and PD-L1 CPS with response was assessed using logistic regression and area under the reciever operating curve (AUROC) analyses, with a 1-sided alpha level of 0.10. Correlation between PD-L1 and sTILs was assessed by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Multivariate analysis included sTILs (pretreatment and on-treatment) and PD-L1 CPS. Likelihood ratio tests were used to evaluate the added value of factors in predicting pCR rate. Results: Of 60 total pts, 34 had tumors evaluated for pretreatment sTILs, 52 for PD-L1 CPS, and 33 for both sTILs and CPS. On-treatment sTILs were evaluated in 31 pts. Overall pCR rates were 56.7% and 60% by ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/Tis ypN0, respectively; ORR was 78.3%. In pts evaluated for sTILs and CPS (individually), pCR rates and ORR were comparable with overall pCR rates and ORR. There was a significant correlation between pretreatment sTILs and PD-L1 CPS (ρ=0.65, P Conclusions:Higher quantities of pretreatment sTILs and PD-L1 CPS and on-treatment sTILs were significantly associated with higher pCR rates and ORR in primary TNBC treated with pembro and NAT. Citation Format: Loi S, Schmid P, Cortés J, Park YH, Muñoz-Couselo E, Kim S-B, Sohn J, Im S-A, Holgado E, Foukakis T, Kuemmel S, Dent R, Wang A, Aktan G, Karantza V, Salgado R. Relationship between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and response to pembrolizumab (Pembro)+chemotherapy (Chemo) as neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): phase Ib KEYNOTE-173 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-09.

Background: MAPK pathway dysregulation is a characteristic molecular abnormality of melanoma. NRAS mutations in melanoma lead to constitutive MAPK activation and subsequent MEK and ERK activation. Inhibiting the pathway with a combination of BRAF/CRAF and MEK inhibitors (LXH254 and TMT, respectively) has demonstrated synergistic activity in preclinical models of NRAS-mutant melanoma. Methods: We report data from an open-label, Phase Ib study (NCT02974725), that tested LXH254 + TMT combination in a dose-escalation (ESC) part in pts with KRAS- or BRAF-mutant NSCLC or NRAS-mutant melanoma and in a dose-expansion (EXP) part in NRAS-mutant melanoma pts. In ESC, five dose levels were explored: LXH254 200 mg twice daily (BID) + TMT (1 mg or 0.5 mg) daily (QD); LXH254 400 mg BID + TMT (1 mg or 0.5 mg) QD; LXH254 400 mg BID + TMT 1 mg (QD, 2 wk on/2 wk off). Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability, and determine the recommended dose for expansion (RDE). Secondary objectives were to characterize pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LXH254 + TMT, and evaluate antitumor activity. Results: As of Dec 9, 2021, 36 and 30 pts were enrolled in ESC and EXP, respectively; median age was 63.5 and 69 y, respectively. Pts in ESC and EXP received a median of 3 (range: 1-6) and 2 (range: 1-7) prior treatments, respectively, including IO (ESC: 88.9% pts; EXP: 96.7% pts). All pts from ESC and 24 pts from EXP discontinued, mainly due to progressive disease (61.1% and 60%, respectively); 6 pts were ongoing in EXP at data cut-off. In ESC, Grade ≥3 (G≥3) DLTs were reported in 6 pts: dermatitis acneiform (n=2), maculopapular rash (n=2), increased lipase (n=1), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (n=1). The RDEs were LXH254 200 mg BID + TMT 1 mg QD and LXH254 400 mg BID + TMT 0.5 mg QD. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 34 pts (94.4%) in ESC and all pts in EXP. G≥3 TRAEs in ESC and EXP were experienced by 19 (52.8%) and 24 (80%) pts, respectively; the most common being rash or dermatitis acneiform (13.9% each) in ESC and rash (33.3%) in EXP. One fatal TRAE (hypovolemic shock) was reported in the LXH254 400 mg BID + TMT 0.5 mg QD group. The ORR in EXP was 46.7% (7 pts; 95% CI: 21.3-73.4) for LXH254 200 mg BID + TMT 1 mg QD and 13.3% (2 pts; 95% CI: 1.7-40.5) for LXH254 400 mg BID + TMT 0.5 mg QD; overall in EXP, 9 pts (30%) achieved PR and 13 pts (43.3%) reported SD. In EXP the median DOR was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.6-7.4). Exposures of LXH254 (200 mg or 400 mg BID) + TMT (0.5 mg or 1 mg QD) vs LXH254 single agent were comparable, indicating no apparent LXH254-TMT interactions. Limited paired tumor biopsy data (n=8) showed substantial MAPK pathway inhibition (DUSP6). Conclusions: LXH254 in combination with TMT has shown preliminary antitumor activity in the pretreated, NRAS-mutant melanoma population. A Phase II trial of LXH254 combinations in pts with pretreated BRAF- or NRAS-mutant melanoma is currently ongoing (NCT04417621). Citation Format: Filippo de Braud, Christophe Dooms, Rebecca S. Heist, Celeste Lebbe, Martin Wermke, David Planchard, Dirk Schadendorf, Piotr Rutkowski, Jürgen Wolf, Paolo A. Ascierto, Ignacio Gil-Bazo, Shumei Kato, Maria Wolodarski, Meredith McKean, Eva Muñoz Couselo, Martin Sebastian, Armando Santoro, Vesselina Cooke, Luca Manganelli, Kitty Wan, Anil Gaur, Tanay S. Samant, Jaeyeon Kim, Giordano Caponigro, Xuân-Mai Couillebault, Michele Moschetta, Adil Daud. Phase Ib study of LXH254 + trametinib (TMT) in patients (pts) with NRAS-mutant melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT197.

Background: There is a lack of predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in melanoma. Immunohistochemistry and gene sequencing are frequently assessed as part of clinical research. Radiomic signatures may also add valuable information, based on parameters which can be related to immune infiltration, therefore defining an imaging biomarkers panel for this clinical scenario. BO-112 is a double stranded synthetic RNA formulated with polyethyleneimine (PEI) that, by mimicking the effect of a viral infection, mobilizes the immune system. The role of imaging biomarkers is being explored in the present phase II clinical trial. Study design: Single arm study with BO-112 plus pembrolizumab (NCT04570332) in patients with advanced melanoma in progression to anti-PD1 therapy. As part of exploratory objectives, a radiomics analysis was performed to detect changes in lesion texture features. Quantitative features were obtained by using Quibim Precision 2.9 platform (Quibim, Valencia, Spain) after the manual delineation of lesions on the CT study of each subject at each timepoint to obtain information about injected/non-injected lesions. Images were normalized by taking into account Hounsfield Units (HU) bias across scanners in a cross-calibration phantom and the Z-score. The difference (Delta) in the features between baseline and week 8 was calculated. Results: Studies were assessed based on event (progression) and based on whether lesions had been injected. Patients with only cutaneous disease were not included in this analysis. Out of 23 patients who had at least two imaging assessments, 6 developed progressive disease by week 8, and 17 subjects had no event by that time. Due to the small sample size, the radiomic analysis was based on hypothesis testing. With regards to volume, 50% of the non-progressing lesions reduced their value from that of the baseline. Regarding injected versus non-injected changes, up to 50% of injected lesions decreased their volume after 8 weeks of injected treatment whereas in non-injected lesions volume decreased in less than 25% of lesions. From the independent sample t-test of delta radiomics features against the injected/non-injected lesions variable, there were 4 features with a statistically significant difference between groups; all of them related to the Low Grey-Level Zone Emphasis. Specifically, Delta original GLRLM Low Grey-Level Run Emphasis showed the highest significant difference between injected and non-injected lesions (p=0.004), with higher and positive delta values in the injected group (75% injected lesions were above 0). Conclusions: Imaging biomarkers provide a large number of quantitative image features with a wide span of information, from size to heterogeneity of the tissue which may be indicator of tumor progression and immune infiltrate. In the analysis of radiomics features, delta GLRLM low grey-level zone emphasis was sensitive to the tumoral changes happening in injected lesions at week 8. This might add insights into the imaging-based evaluation of immune infiltration in intratumoral immunotherapy and the creation of associated imaging biomarkers panels. Citation Format: Paula Moreno, Philippe Saiag, Luis de la Cruz Merino, Caroline Dutriaux, Eduardo Castanon Álvarez, Caroline Robert, Juan F. Rodríguez-Moreno, Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes, Ana M. Arance, Henry Montaudié, Miguel F. Sanmamed, María González Cao, María Pilar López Criado, Julie Charles, Alfonso Berrocal, Enrique de Miguel, Elisa Funk-Brentano, Pablo Sau Llanas, Sorilla Prey, Eva Muñoz-Couselo, Delvys Rodríguez Abreu, Juan Martin-Liberal, Ángel Alberich-Bayarri, Javier Sánchez López, Sonia Macia, Marisol Quintero, Marya F. Chaney, Stéphane Dalle, Iván Márquez-Rodas. Radiomic features in tumor assessment, preliminary results from a phase 2 study of intratumoral administration of BO-112 with pembrolizumab in patients with anti PD1 refractory melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT109.