Search

Background: Up to 6% of patients (pts) with HER2 positive (pos) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) experience a radiologic complete response (rCR) to a first line of therapy, but these results mostly derive from dated and/or limited cohorts. Aim of this study was to define the clinico-pathological characteristics of HER2 positive (pos) MBC pts experiencing a rCR. Methods: Pts were selected from the database of the GIM14 study (NCT02284581) and classified according to the best radiologic response obtained to the first line chemotherapy (CT) and upon time-to-treatment-failure (TTF). rCR was defined as complete response (CR) with a TTF > 3 months. The association across variables was tested through logistic regression and their prognostic impact in terms of overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Of the 3,423 pts included in the GIM14 study, 814 had HER2 pos MBC. After exclusion of pts treated with first line endocrine therapy and/or with TTF < 3 months, 656 pts were included in the present analysis, of which 96 (14.6%) experienced a rCR. Instead, the best response was a partial response for 295 pts (45.0%), stable disease for 221 pts (33.7%), and progression for 44 pts (6.7%). Most pts (59.8%) presented de novo MBC; 379 pts (57.8%) had visceral metastases (mets), 609 pts (92.8%) did not have central nervous system (CNS) involvement and 318 pts (48.5%) had only 1 site of distant mets. Also, 445 pts (67.9%) had hormone receptor (HR) pos disease, a HER2 3+ score at immunohistochemistry (IHC) was present in 59.8% of cases versus 40.2% with HER2 2+ at IHC and in situ hybridization (ISH) + disease. Taxanes were the main CT backbone (489 pts, 74.5%), 341 pts (52.0%) had received a Trastuzumab-Pertuzumab doublet. At multivariable analysis, higher odds of experiencing a rCR were reported for presence of non-visceral mets (OR 1.87, 95%CI 1.10-3.17), low number of metastatic sites (OR 2.42, 95%CI 0.80-7.33 for 1 site only) and HER2 3+ score at IHC (OR 1.80, 95%CI 1.09-2.98). Disease-free interval (DFI) was associated to rCR at univariable but not at multivariable analysis. HR status, CT backbone and type of anti-HER2 regimen were not associated with rCR neither at univariable nor at multivariable analysis. Median follow-up was 76.2 months. Amongst pts with TTF>12 months, those with rCR had a significantly higher OS compared to those not experiencing a rCR (median OS 133 and 90 months, respectively; p=0.0191). OS rates in pts with TTF ≥ 12 months were 97.8% at 2-year follow-up and 59.4% at 5-year follow-up. Instead, in pts with TTF ≥ 60 months, OS rates were 76.7% at 10-year follow-up. Amongst the 96 pts experiencing a CR, 38 had a rCR with TTF between 12 and 60 months, while 22 pts had a rCR with a TTF ≥ 60 months. The remaining pts had a CR with a TTF < 12 months. Pts with HR negative (neg) disease were found to be more likely to experience a rCR with a with TTF between 12 and 60 months, whilst pts with HR pos disease had a higher probability to experience a rCR with a TTF ≥ 60 months (p=0.0074). Pts with HER2 3+ score at IHC had a higher probability to achieve a rCR with a TTF ≥ 12 months compared to pts with HER2 2+ score at IHC and ISH + (p=0.0216). Age at diagnosis, menopausal status, DFI, number and site of mets, CT backbone and anti-HER2 therapy did not influence the duration of the rCR obtained. Conclusions: This study characterized a real-world cohort of HER2 positive MBC patients experiencing radiologic complete response to a first line treatment. Based on these results a clinical trial focused on liquid biopsy-based minimal residual disease is being designed. Novel anti-HER2 agents are gaining momentum as ever increasingly effective treatments and future de-escalation strategies after complete response will represent a growing need. Citation Format: Linda Cucciniello, Eva Blondeaux, Claudia Bighin, Simona Gasparro, Stefania Russo, Arianna Dri, Palma Pugliese, Andrea Fontana, Giuseppe Naso, Antonella Ferzi, Ferdinando Riccardi, Valentina Sini, Luca Boni, Alessandra Fabi, Filippo Montemurro, Michelino De Laurentiis, Grazia Arpino, Lucia Del Mastro, Lorenzo Gerratana, Fabio Puglisi. Assessing the clinico-pathological characteristics of HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients experiencing radiologic complete response in a nationwide cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-11-04.

Background/Aim: Clinicopathological features of patients undergoing margin enlargement after lumpectomy for early breast cancer with positive/close excision margins were analyzed in order to define whether a re-operative procedure could have been avoided. Furthermore, a standardized protocol of specimen orientation was adopted in order to optimize both the widening procedure as well as the oncologic outcome. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed including pre-, peri-, and post-operative parameters, and a predictive score by means of a multivariate model was developed using all clinically and statistically significant variables associated with residual disease (RD). Results: RD was significantly related to positive tumor margins, hormone receptor negative, HER2-positive, and tumors with high Ki67 proliferation index (p3, only 2 patients (2.0%) had RD, while in 81 patients with a score ≤3, 55 patients (67.9%) had RD (p

Background: Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation before starting chemotherapy is standard of care for young women with breast cancer wishing to preserve fertility. However, some oncologists remain concerned on the safety of COS, particularly in patients with hormone-sensitive tumors. Moreover, limited evidence exists on the safety of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in breast cancer survivors after completion of anticancer treatments. Material and methods: A systematic literature review with no date restriction up to June 30, 2021 was conducted to identify studies reporting results of oncological outcomes in breast cancer patients and survivors who underwent COS or other ART compared to patients and survivors who did not access these techniques. From each included study, recurrence ratio, event-free survival (EFS) and mortality rate were extracted. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random effects models. Results: Out of 15 included studies (n=4,643), 11 reported outcomes of patients who underwent COS for fertility preservation before starting chemotherapy, and 4 of survivors who underwent ART following anticancer treatment completion. Compared to women who did not receive fertility preservation at diagnosis (n=2,386), those who underwent COS (n=1,594) had reduced risk of recurrence (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.73) or mortality (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76). No detrimental effect of COS on EFS was observed (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55-1.06). A similar trend of better outcomes in terms of EFS was observed in women with hormone-receptor positive disease who underwent COS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20-0.65).Compared to women not exposed to ART following completion of anticancer treatments (n=540), those exposed to ART (n=123) showed a tendency for better outcomes in terms of recurrence ratio (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.70) and EFS (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.17-1.11). Conclusions: Despite including mostly retrospective studies, this meta-analysis suggests that accessing COS at diagnosis, also in hormone receptor-positive disease, or ART following treatment completion is not associated with detrimental prognostic effect in young women with breast cancer. These results are important to reassure patients and oncologists on the safety of these procedures to increase the chances of future conception. Citation Format: Luca Arecco, Eva Blondeaux, Marco Bruzzone, Marcello Ceppi, Maria Maddalena Latocca, Andrea Boutros, Camilla Marrocco, Maria Grazia Razeti, Maurizio Cosso, Stefano Spinaci, Margherita Condorelli, Claudia Massarotti, Lucia Del Mastro, Isabelle Demeestere, Matteo Lambertini. Safety of assisted reproductive technologies before and after anticancer treatments in young women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-07.

Previous analyses of the GIM (Gruppo Italiano Mammella) 2 study showed that addition of fluorouracil to epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel in patients with node-positive early breast cancer does not improve outcome, whereas dose-dense chemotherapy induces a significant improvement in both disease-free survival and overall survival as compared with a standard schedule. Here, we present long-term results of the study.In this 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients aged 18-70 years with operable, node-positive, breast cancer with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 from 81 hospitals in Italy. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) to one of the four following study groups: four cycles of standard-interval intravenous EC (epirubicin 90 mg/mBetween April 24, 2003, and July 3, 2006, 2091 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 545 to q3EC-P, 544 to q3FEC-P, 502 to q2EC-P, and 500 to q2FEC-P. 88 patients were enrolled in centres providing only standard interval schedule and were assigned only to q3FEC-P and q3EC-P; thus, 2091 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis for the comparison of EC-P (1047 patients) versus FEC-P (1044 patients) and 2003 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis for the comparison of dose-dense (1002 patients) versus standard interval analysis (1001 patients). After a median follow-up of 15·1 years (IQR 8·4-16·3), median disease-free survival was not significantly different between FEC-P and EC-P groups (17·09 years [95% CI 15·51-not reached] vs not reached [17·54-not reached]; unadjusted hazard ratio 1·12 [95% CI 0·98-1·29]; log-rank p=0·11). Median disease-free survival was significantly higher in the dose-dense interval group than the standard-interval group (not reached [95% CI 17·45-not reached] vs 16·52 [14·24-17·54]; 0·77 [95% CI 0·67-0·89]; p=0·0004). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (200 [37%] of 536 patients in the q3EC-P group vs 257 [48%] of 533 in the q3FEC-P group vs 50 [10%] of 496 q2EC-P vs 97 [20%] of 492) and alopecia (238 [44%] vs 249 [47%] vs 228 [46%] vs 235 [48%]). During extended follow-up, no further grade 3-4 adverse events or deaths related to toxic-effects were reported. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in nine (2%) patients in the q3EC-P group, seven (1%) in the q3FEC-P group, nine (2%) in the q2EC-P group, and nine (2%) in the q2FEC-P group. No treatment-related deaths occurred.Updated results from the GIM2 study support that optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk early breast cancer should not include fluorouracil and should use a dose-dense schedule.Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmacia, Dompè Biotec Italy, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, and Alliance Against Cancer.

Several models of genetic counseling have been proposed to tackle the increasing volume of individuals requiring access to BRCA testing. Few data are available on patient experience and retention of information with nurse-driven genetic counseling. We evaluated the experience and retention of information in women with an uninformative BRCA test result and who were not considered at high risk due to their personal/family history of cancer who underwent geneticist-supervised nurse-driven genetic counseling and who received their test result by phone. Women who received an uninformative BRCA test result between May 2017 and September 2019 were administered a questionnaire exploring experience with genetic counseling and retention of information provided. Of 366 eligible women, 299 (273 breast cancer patients and 26 women without breast cancer) completed the interview. Overall, 280 women (93.6%) positively valued their experience with genetic counseling and 287 (96.0%) considered it helpful with 57.5% of them feeling reassured for themselves and their family. Information on the clinical implications of the test result was correctly retained and women acted accordingly. Overall, 252 women (87.8%) accurately reported their test result as normal/negative. Only 67 (22.4%) recognized that despite a normal BRCA test result, a low probability of a hereditary syndrome remains. Most women showed a poor ability to estimate cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers and in the general population. Geneticist-supervised nurse-driven genetic counseling process for women with uninformative BRCA test result is associated with a positive patient experience and an adequate retention of information concerning the management of their personal and familial cancer risk. The design and implementation of nurse-driven genetic counseling models may contribute to efficient and timely access to BRCA genetic testing.

Background: Pregnancy-related issues are a priority for young breast cancer (BC) patients. Increasing evidence has shown that pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis is feasible. Nevertheless, few BC survivors conceive following anticancer treatment completion and many physicians remain concerned about the potentially detrimental effects of pregnancy after BC in terms of fetal/obstetrical outcomes and maternal prognosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at providing updated and solid evidence on these important issues. Methods: A systematic literature review up to January 31, 2020 with no language restriction was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis. Chances of pregnancy after BC, fetal and obstetrical outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Pooled relative risks (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random effects models. The study is registered with the PROSPERO registration number CRD42020158324. Results: Overall, 39 studies were included. Out of the 8,265,713 young women included in these studies, 8,093,401 were from the general population, 57,739 had cancers other than BC, 114,573 had BC. Among the 114,573 BC patients, 7,505 had a pregnancy after BC diagnosis and 107,068 did not. Compared to women from the general population, BC patients had 60% reduced chances of having a pregnancy following anticancer treatment completion (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32-0.49). Among other cancer patients, only women with prior cervical cancer had lower pregnancy rates (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.31-0.35) than BC patients. Compared to the general population, BC survivors had significantly increased risks of low birth weight (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.31-1.73), small for gestational age (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33), preterm delivery (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.88) and caesarean section (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.25). No significant increased risk of congenital abnormalities (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.89-2.98) or other pregnancy or delivery complications (spontaneous or induced abortion, gestosis, antepartum or postpartum hemorrhage) was observed. Prior chemotherapy exposure or short pregnancy interval (defined as Pregnancy after BC was not associated with a negative impact on patients’ outcomes. Compared to BC patients without subsequent pregnancy, those with pregnancy after BC had better OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.67) and DFS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.94). Similar results were observed in the studies correcting for the potential “healthy mother effect” (OS: HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42-0.65; DFS: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.96). No detrimental prognostic effect of pregnancy after BC was observed in patients with hormone-receptor positive disease (DFS: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.73-1.66), while better outcomes were observed for those with hormone-receptor negative disease (DFS: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95). The safety of pregnancy after BC was observed irrespective of BRCA status, nodal status, previous chemotherapy exposure, pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions: This large meta-analysis provides solid evidence on the safety of pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis. The increased risk of fetal and obstetrical complications (but not of congenital abnormalities) calls for ensuring a closer monitoring of these pregnancies. The significantly reduced chances of conceiving as compared to the general population and other cancer patients should raise further awareness on the need to improve the oncofertility counseling of young BC patients wishing to complete their family planning following anticancer treatment completion. Citation Format: Eva Blondeaux, Marta Perachino, Marco Bruzzone, Richard A. Anderson, Evandro De Azambuja, Philip D. Poorvu, Hee Jeong Kim, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Barbara Pistilli, Ines Vaz-Luis, Cristina Saura, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Maria Alice Franzoi, Chiara Sertoli, Marcello Ceppi, Hatem A. Azim, Jr., Frederic Amant, Isabelle Demeestere, Lucia Del Mastro, Ann H. Partridge, Olivia Pagani, Fedro A. Peccatori, Matteo Lambertini. Chances of pregnancy after breast cancer, reproductive and disease outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-09.

BACKGROUND/AIM A retrospective study was performed in 246 breast cancer patients to define whether tumor-to-nipple distance (TND) assessment by breast MRI may select patients eligible to nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) as compared to permanent section assessment of retroareolar margin. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pre- and post-operative parameters including imaging data, histology of the primary tumor, biologic prognostic factors, and adjuvant regimens were retrieved; patients with close/positive retroareolar margins underwent nipple or NAC excision. The primary endpoint was loco-regional recurrence (LRR). RESULTS Patients with TND ≤2 cm had a significantly higher rate of invasive ductal carcinoma (p

Survivorship has become a crucial component in breast cancer care. For women who have not completed their family planning, conceiving at the end of anticancer treatments should not be discouraged but might be challenging. Oncofertility counseling should be offered at the time of diagnosis to all patients, in order to inform them about the potential treatment-induced gonadotoxicity as well as the available strategies for fertility preservation, thus allowing to increase the chances of a future pregnancy. This article reports an updated overview on the current state of the art on pregnancy in women with prior breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, with a main focus on the issues faced by patients with history of hormone receptor-positive disease and BRCA carriers.

Breast cancer; Prognosis; Treatment Cáncer de mama; Pronóstico; Tratamiento Càncer de mama; Pronòstic; Tractament Approximately 10% of breast cancers are associated with the inheritance of a pathogenic variant (PV) in one of the breast cancer susceptibility genes. Multiple breast cancer predisposing genes, including TP53, are responsible for the increased breast cancer risk. Tumor protein-53 (TP53) germline PVs are associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a rare autosomal dominant inherited cancer predisposition syndrome associated with early-onset pediatric and multiple primary cancers such as soft tissue and bone sarcomas, breast cancer, brain tumors, adrenocortical carcinomas and leukemias. Women harboring a TP53 PV carry a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer of 80–90%. The aim of the present narrative review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the criteria for offering TP53 testing, prevalence of TP53 carriers among patients with breast cancer, and what is known about its prognostic and therapeutic implications. A summary of the current indications of secondary cancer surveillance and survivorship issues are also provided. Finally, the spectrum of TP53 alteration and testing is discussed. The optimal strategies for the treatment of breast cancer in patients harboring TP53 PVs poses certain challenges. Current guidelines favor the option of performing mastectomy rather than lumpectomy to avoid adjuvant radiotherapy and subsequent risk of radiation-induced second primary malignancies, with careful consideration of radiation when indicated post-mastectomy. Some studies suggest that patients with breast cancer and germline TP53 PV might have worse survival outcomes compared to patients with breast cancer and wild type germline TP53 status. Annual breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and whole-body MRI are recommended as secondary prevention. The project was partially funded by a Gilead Sciences Medical Grant (Fellowship Program 2022) (no grant number).

Objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become the preferred treatment in HER2-positive early breast cancer. Several trials investigated the neoadjuvant efficacy of dual HER2 blockade with anthracycline-free chemotherapy, whereas few data are available on single-agent trastuzumab and anthracycline-based regimens, which represent the standard of care in the adjuvant setting. This phase II, single-arm trial assessed anthracycline-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment for high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: Forty-three patients with stage II–III HER2-positive breast cancer were treated with 4 courses of neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 90 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (FEC ×4) every 21 days, followed by 12 courses of weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 and trastuzumab 2 mg/Kg IV (loading dose 4 mg/kg). Results: Pathologic complete response (pCR) was observed in 22 (51%) of 43 patients. After a median follow-up of 6 years, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 85.8% (95% confidence interval 75.9%–97%) and 89.6% (80.4%–99.8%), respectively. A temporary decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction was observed in two patients. No cardiac death or congestive heart failure occurred. One patient died due to febrile neutropenia. Conclusions: FEC ×4 followed by paclitaxel and trastuzumab was associated with high pCR rates and favorable long-term outcomes. However, this regimen was associated with relevant hematologic toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Young breast cancer (BC) survivors are at risk of infertility. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation before (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care. Research efforts have shown no negative prognostic effect of pregnancy following BC therapy, also among BRCA carriers. Currently, poor evidence is available on the safety to undergo ART following BC treatment, with no data in carriers of germline BRCA pathogenic variants. To provide evidence on the safety of fertility treatments in this specific population, we assessed the outcomes of a cohort of BRCA-mutated BC survivors who had a pregnancy after prior BC history by comparing the group of patients who underwent ART to achieve pregnancy to the group with spontaneous pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤ 40 years with stage I-III BC, between January 2000 and December 2012, bearing germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Survivors with a pregnancy (any outcome) after BC, with no disease-free survival (DFS) event before pregnancy, were assigned to the ART and non-ART group if their pregnancy was achieved through ART or spontaneously, respectively. ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). RESULTS: Of 1,424 patients registered in the study, 168 with a pregnancy after BC were included in the present analysis. A total of 22 patients were included in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Before BC diagnosis, 18.2% patients in the ART group had at least one child, compared to 38.4% in the non-ART group (P=0.030). Patients had a median age at BC diagnosis of 33.0 vs 30.2 years old in the ART group and in the non-ART group, respectively (P=0.004); 45.4% and 17.1% had grade 1-2 tumors, respectively (P=0.008), and 59.1% vs 31.5% had hormone receptor-positive tumors, respectively (P=0.016). Both cohorts had similar tumor size and nodal stage characteristics. Type and duration of endocrine therapy were comparable between groups. The type of ART was not specified in 5 survivors (22.7%). Ovulation induction was used in 1 patient (4.5%), ovarian stimulation in 7 patients (31.8%), embryo transfer under HRT following oocyte donation in 5 patients (22.7%), and embryo transfer under HRT following oocyte and/or embryo cryopreservation for fertility preservation in 4 patients (18.2%). Median age at conception among survivors was 39.7 years in the ART group versus 35.4 years in the non-ART group (P Citation Format: Margherita Condorelli, Marco Bruzzone, Marcello Ceppi, Alberta Ferrari, Albert Grinshpun, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Evandro de Azambuja, Estela Carrasco, Fedro A. Peccatori, Antonio Di Meglio, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Philip D. Poorvu, Marta Venturelli, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Claire Senechal, Luca Livraghi, Riccardo Ponzone, Laura De Marchis, Katarzyna Pogoda, Amir Sonnenblick, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Octavi Córdoba, Luis Teixeira, Florian Clatot, Kevin Punie, Rossella Graffeo Galbiati, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Francois P. Duhoux, Fabio Puglisi, Arlindo R. Ferreira, Eva Blondeaux, Tamar Peretz-Yablonski, Olivier Caron, Claire Saule, Lieveke Ameye, Judith Balmaña, Ann H. Partridge, Hatem A. Azim, Jr, Isabelle Demeestere, Matteo Lambertini. Safety of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) following treatment completion in young women with germline BRCA pathogenic variants having a pregnancy after breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-06.

Background: Real world data have the potential to demonstrate the applicability of the results of randomized studies in the general population. SUPER trial was conducted in order to assess the activity, the efficacy and the safety of the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy in clinical practice.Material and methods: Patients diagnosed with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and treated with pertuzumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy were accrued at 18 italian hospitals. Data were retrospectively collected in the time frame between pertuzumab availability in clinical practice and study approval in 2016, and prospectively collected thereafter. Results: Overall 342 HER2 positive mBC were accrued. 172 patients had relapsed disease and 56.4% of them received neo/adjuvant trastuzumab. 205 patients received docetaxel. Objective response rate was 76.3% (95%CI: 71.4–80.7). Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 24.3 months (95% CI: 20.0–28.9) and 70.2 months (95% CI: 61.4–79.0) respectively. Triple positive patients treated with endocrine therapy in addition to pertuzumab and trastuzumab maintenance had a significant longer PFS and OS than patients who did not. mPFS was 31.2 months and 13 months respectively (HR=0.47; 95% CI: 0.33–0.66; pConclusions: SUPER suggests that results of first-line treatment with pertuzumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy in unselected patients are consistent with findings from CLEOPATRA trial.Moreover, as expected from real world evidence, new insights have emerged.

Background: Luminal A-like and luminal B-like subtypes have different sensitivity to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, but their role in predicting dose-dense (DD) efficacy in the high-risk setting is unknown. In this exploratory analysis of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella 2 (GIM2) trial, we investigated DD efficacy according to luminal-like subtypes. Methods: Patients with node-positive early breast cancer were randomised to receive either DD or standard-interval (SI) anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by paclitaxel. In our analysis, luminal A-like cohort was identified as having a Ki67 < 20% and a progesterone receptor (PgR) ≥ 20%; luminal B-like cohort as having a Ki67 ≥ 20% and/or a PgR < 20%. Results: Out of 2003 patients enrolled in the GIM2 trial, 412 had luminal A-like and 638 luminal B-like breast cancer. After a median follow-up of 7.9 years, disease-free survival (DFS) was 80.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.4–84.5) and 70.5% (66.5–74.2) in luminal A-like and luminal B-like cohorts; overall survival (OS) was 91.6% (88.2–94.1) and 85.1% (81.7–87.9), respectively. We found no significant interaction between treatment and luminal subtype (interaction p = 0.603 and 0.535 for DFS and OS, respectively). When DD efficacy was investigated separately in each cohort, luminal-B like cohort appeared to benefit more from the DD schedule both in terms of DFS (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.72 [95% CI 0.54–0.96]) and OS (unadjusted HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.40–0.94]), compared with the luminal A-like cohort (unadjusted HR for DFS 0.89 [95% CI 0.59–1.33]; unadjusted HR for OS 0.83 [95% CI 0.45–1.54]). Conclusions: No significant interaction between luminal-like subtype and treatment was observed. Patients in the luminal B-like cohort seemed to benefit more from DD schedule.

Background Knowledge is growing on the safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in cancer survivors. No data exist, however, for the specific population of breast cancer patients harboring germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Patients and methods This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤40 years with stage I-III breast cancer, between January 2000 and December 2012, harboring known germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Patients included in this analysis had a post-treatment pregnancy either achieved through use of ART (ART group) or naturally (non-ART group). ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy. Results Among the 1424 patients registered in the study, 168 were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis, of whom 22 were in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Survivors in the ART group conceived at an older age compared with those in the non-ART group (median age: 39.7 versus 35.4 years, respectively). Women in the ART group experienced more delivery complications compared with those in the non-ART group (22.1% versus 4.1%, respectively). No other apparent differences in obstetrical outcomes were observed between cohorts. The median follow-up from pregnancy was 3.4 years (range: 0.8-8.6 years) in the ART group and 5.0 years (range: 0.8-17.6 years) in the non-ART group. Two patients (9.1%) in the ART group experienced a disease-free survival event (specifically, a locoregional recurrence) compared with 40 patients (27.4%) in the non-ART group. In the ART group, no patients deceased compared with 10 patients (6.9%) in the non-ART group. Conclusion This study provides encouraging safety data on the use of ART in breast cancer survivors harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, when natural conception fails or when they opt for ART in order to carry out preimplantation genetic testing., Highlights • No data exist on safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients. • This study investigated outcomes of patients with a post-treatment pregnancy achieved through ART use or naturally. • 2 (9.1%) and 40 (27.4%) patients in the ART and non-ART groups experienced a disease-free survival event. • This study provides encouraging safety data on ART use in BRCA-mutated breast cancer survivors. • ART is feasible when natural conception fails or when survivors opt for carrying out preimplantation genetic testing.

Background: Around 20% of breast cancers (BC) are HER-2+. Trastuzumab (T) has dramatically changed the outcome of HER-2+ BC patients (pts), both in early and in advanced settings. The combination of Pertuzumab (P) plus T and docetaxel, used as first-line treatment for HER-2+ metastatic BC (MBC) in the phase III CLEOPATRA study, significantly prolonged progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In order to verify the results of the Cleopatra trial in unselected pts, we performed a multicenter, retrospective-prospective, observational study, in HER-2+ MBC pts candidate to receive first line therapy with P plus T plus taxanes. Methods: We analyze the outcome of all HER-2+ MBC pts treated with P+T and taxanes, as first line therapy since the availability of P in Italy (2013), at 13 general and university hospitals. Results: Until June 6th data from 217 HER-2+ MBC pts were recorded. Main pts' characteristics were: median age 54 y (28-80), median ECOG PS 0 (0-2), hormonal receptor positive 152 pts (70%), 60 pts (27.6%) received neo/adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) + T and 75 pts (34.5%) adjuvant endocrine therapy. Most common metastatic sites: bone 121 pts (55.7%), liver 85 pts (39.2%), lung 61 pts (28.1%), soft tissues 133 pts (61.3%); 8 pts had CNS involvement. Seventy-eight pts (35.9%) had bone and/or soft tissues disease only; 108 pts (49.7%) had metastatic disease on presentation. Median number of metastatic sites was 3 (1-8). 144 pts (66.3%) and 72 pts (33.2%) received docetaxel (D) and paclitaxel (P) respectively. Median number of CT cycles was 6 for both drugs (D range 1-13; P range 1-18). Up to now 23 pts are still on CT and 86 on maintenance; ORR in evaluated pts (189) is 80.9% (47 and 106 pts obtained CR and PR respectively), 11 pts experienced PD during CT; 113 pts (58.2%) received endocrine therapy during maintenance.Median PFS is 14.7+ months (0.3+ - 53.2+). Most common adverse events are reported in table 1 Table 1Adverse EventAll grades N (%)Grade 3-4 N (%)Leukopenia39 (18)10 (4.6)Neutropenia42 (19.3)16 (7.3)Anemia50 (23)2 (0.9)Febrile Neutropenia7 (3.2) Diarrhea103 (47.4)10 (4.6)Asthenia127 (58.5)5 (2.3)Peripheral Neuropathy80 (36.8)3 (1.3)Stomatitis67 (30.8)2 (0.9) Nail changes, nausea, alopecia, rash and arthro-myalgia were also reported. Three pts interrupted CT due to symptomatic drop of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); 2 pts interrupted maintenance P due to rash and dyspnea respectively, 16 stopped P and T due to drop in LVEF, 1 due to occurrence of ALL and 1 refused to continue. Conclusions: Our preliminary results highlight the activity and safety of the combination of CT plus P and T in unselected HER-2+ MBC patients. The study is ongoing and updated results will be presented. Citation Format: Garrone O, D'Onofrio L, Blondeaux E, Bertolini I, Giarratano T, Beano A, Saggia C, Cazzaniga M, LaVerde N, Collovà E, Milani A, De Conciliis E, Coltelli L, Airoldi M, Del Mastro L, Cursano MC, Michelotti A, Vandone AM, Guarneri V, Donadio M, Riva F, Nuzzo A, Merlano MC. Moving from the CLEOPATRA study to real life: Preliminary results from the G.O.N.O. SUPER trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-29.

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy diagnosed in premenopausal women. In this age group, breast tumors tend to be diagnosed at more advanced stages and to harbor more aggressive biological features. In addition, specific age-related issues including genetic counseling, fertility preservation, impact on social and couple relationships, working life, and management of long-term side effects should be considered highly relevant when managing early breast cancer in premenopausal women. Therefore, the care of these patients is particularly complex and a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory. The present review summarizes the current state of art in the adjuvant systemic treatment of premenopausal women with early breast cancer focusing on the optimal chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy approaches in this specific patient population.

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors’ suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and improves overall survival (OS). The purpose of the current article is to review available evidence on dose-dense chemotherapy, also focusing on special population, including premenopausal women and those with HER2-positive disease. RECENT FINDINGS A recent patient-level meta-analysis showed that the use of dose-dense chemotherapy is associated with significant reduction in disease recurrence, breast cancer mortality and improvement in OS. The benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy is irrespective from HER2 status, although women with HER2-positive disease enrolled in trials included in the meta-analysis did not receive the current standard of treatment with anti-HER2 agents. Among premenopausal women, dose-dense chemotherapy improved OS, and thus should be considered standard of care for them. SUMMARY In conclusion, high-risk early stage breast cancer patients should be treated with (neo)adjuvant dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by paclitaxel. In the era of trastuzumab, the benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy is still unclear for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Background Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care in high-risk early breast cancer patients. Dose-dense should be the preferred schedule of administration. However, its long-term benefit is unknown. Methods In the Italian multicentre Phase 3 randomised MIG-1 trial, node-positive and high-risk node- negative breast cancer patients were randomised to receive six cycles of adjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide regimen administered every 3 (FEC21) or 2 (FEC14) weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Results From 1992 to 1997, 1214 patients were included. Median follow-up was 15.8 years. In all, 15-year OS was 71% and 68% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.89; p = 0.25). In all, 15-year EFS was 47% and 43% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.87; p = 0.18). In a pre-planned subgroup analysis, among patients with hormone receptor-negative tumours, 15-year OS was 70% and 65% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51–1.06); 15-year EFS was 58% and 43% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51–0.96). Conclusions Updated results from the MIG-1 study are numerically in favour of dose-dense chemotherapy, and suggest a long-term benefit of this approach in high-risk early breast cancer patients.

Background T-DM1 improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer progressing on prior trastuzumab plus a taxane. A paucity of data is available on T-DM1 efficacy after dual anti-HER2 blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus a taxane, which represents the current first-line standard of care. The present study is a retrospective/prospective evaluation of the efficacy and activity of second-line T-DM1 after front-line pertuzumab-based therapy. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were identified within the Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) 14/BIOMETA study, a retrospective/prospective multicenter study on treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic breast cancer ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02284581 ). We searched for patients who received second-line T-DM1 after taxane plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab between November 15, 2013 and May 31, 2018. We calculated median PFS, median time to treatment failure (TTF), prolonged duration of therapy (PDT), objective response rate (ORR), and 1-year OS. Results Of 445 patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, 77 were eligible for the analysis. At a median follow-up of 7 months, median PFS was 6.3 months (95% confidence intervals [CI], 4.8-7.7 months), and median TTF was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4-8.6 months). More than one-third of patients (37.6%; n = 29) experienced PDT with an ORR of 27.1%. At data cutoff, the median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS was 82%. Conclusions Our results show meaningful activity of T-DM1 after front-line pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and a taxane, with about 27% of patients having an objective response and 40% of patients achieving durable disease control.

The use of chemotherapy in premenopausal cancer patients may lead to chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure. Pharmacological temporary ovarian suppression obtained with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administered concomitantly with chemotherapy has been investigated as a technique capable to reduce the gonadotoxicity, reducing the risk of developing premature menopause. In recent years, important evidence has become available on the efficacy and safety of this strategy that should now be considered a standard option for ovarian function preservation in premenopausal breast cancer patients. However, in women interested in fertility preservation, this is not an alternative to cryopreservation strategies, which remains the first option to be proposed. The purpose of this review is to summarize the mechanisms of GnRHa in the preservation of fertility in premenopausal cancer patient candidates to receive chemotherapy, highlighting the areas of doubt that require further investigation.

516 Background: Current guidelines recommend GnRH agonist (GnRHa) use during chemotherapy (CT) as a strategy to reduce the risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer (EBC). However, no long-term safety data are available raising some concerns on concurrent use of GnRHa during CT in patients with hormone receptor-positive disease. In addition, there is no evidence on the protective role of this strategy in patients with germline BRCA mutations ( mBRCA). Here, we report the final analysis of the PROMISE-GIM6 phase III randomized study, the largest trial addressing the role of GnRHa use during CT in premenopausal EBC patients (Del Mastro et al, JAMA 2011 & Lambertini et al, JAMA 2015). Methods: From October 2003 to January 2008, 281 premenopausal patients aged 18 to 45 years with stage I-III EBC candidates for (neo)adjuvant CT were randomized to receive CT alone or combined with the GnRHa triptorelin. Primary endpoint was incidence of CT-induced POI (defined as amenorrhea and post-menopausal FSH/estradiol levels 1 year following CT). This final analysis reports on post-treatment pregnancies, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). An exploratory descriptive analysis in mBRCA patients is also reported. (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT00311636) Results: Of the 281 randomized patients (CT+GnRHa arm = 148; CT alone arm = 133), 80% had hormone receptor-positive disease. At the time of this final analysis, 38 (13.5%) patients were lost to follow-up. Median follow-up was 12.4 years (IQR: 11.3-13.2 years). In the CT+GnRHa and CT alone arms, respectively, 9 (10-year cumulative incidence of pregnancy 6.5%, 95% CI 3.5%-12.3%) and 4 (10-year cumulative incidence of pregnancy 3.2%, 95% CI 1.2%-8.3%) patients had a post-treatment pregnancy (HR 2.14, 95% CI 0.66-6.92). No differences in 10-year DFS (72.4% in CT+GnRHa arm vs. 71.2% in CT alone arm: HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.76-1.77) nor in 10-year OS (82.0% in CT+GnRHa arm vs. 85.9% in CT alone arm: HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.67-2.03) were observed. There was no interaction between treatment effect and hormone receptor status. In patients with hormone receptor-positive disease, HR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.63-1.63) for DFS and 1.12 (95% CI 0.59-2.11) for OS. Out of 43 patients tested for BRCA, overall incidence of POI, irrespective of treatment arm, was 20% in mBRCA patients (n = 10) and 12% in patients without mBRCA (n = 33). In mBRCA patients, incidence of POI was 0% and 33% in the CT+GnRHa and CT alone arms, respectively. One post-treatment pregnancy was described in a patient with mBRCA1 in the CT alone arm. Conclusions: The final analysis of the PROMISE-GIM6 trial at a median follow-up of 12.4 years provides reassuring evidence on the safety of GnRHa use during CT as a strategy to preserve ovarian function in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT00311636.

The cardiovascular effects of estrogen deprivation induced by aromatase inhibitors are unknown. We carried out a cross-sectional study to evaluate the effect of estrogen deprivation induced by aromatase inhibitors on markers of cardiovascular risk. We enrolled 410 postmenopausal women: 200 consecutive breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors for a median of 53 months (range 23–122) and 210 volunteer controls. Carotid intima-media thickness, presence of carotid stenosis, and presence of abdominal aortic aneurism were evaluated through an ultrasound examination. Average carotid intima-media thickness was 0.97 ± 0.02 mm and 1.08 ± 0.02 mm for breast cancer group and control group, respectively (p

Background Despite the availability of different strategies for ovarian function and/or fertility preservation in young breast cancer patients candidates for chemotherapy, limited data are available on patients’ actual need of these options. Patients and methods The PREFER study is a prospective cohort study including premenopausal women with newly diagnosed early stage breast cancer between the age of 18 and 45 years and candidates for chemotherapy. The study aimed to investigate patients' preferences and their choices of the different available strategies for ovarian function and/or fertility preservation (i.e. acceptance rate) and reasons for refusal. Results A total of 131 consecutive patients referred from a single breast unit were included. Median age was 38.9 years with 92 patients (70.3%) diagnosed at ≤ 40 years. The majority of patients (122, 93.1%) were concerned about the risk of treatment-induced premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and/or infertility. A total of 120 (91.6%) patients underwent temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy for ovarian function preservation. Among patients with ≤40 years, only 11 (12.0%) decided to access cryopreservation strategies for fertility preservation. The main reason for not accessing the fertility unit was completion of family planning before breast cancer diagnosis; for patients who accessed the fertility unit, fear of the procedure was the main reason to refuse the proposed cryopreservation strategies. Conclusion Despite the majority of young breast cancer patients are concerned about the risk of treatment-induced POI and/or infertility, only a limited number of them required to access the fertility unit to undergo cryopreservation strategies.

Background In the prepertuzumab era, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer who underwent first-line trastuzumab-based or lapatinib-based therapy according to prior exposure to (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Materials and methods In this multicentre retrospective cohort study conducted in 14 Italian centres of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella, consecutive patients undergoing first-line trastuzumab or lapatinib-based therapy were included. Analyses were performed according to the type of first-line therapy for metastatic disease (trastuzumab or lapatinib). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were analysed using logistic regression and time-to-event outcomes using Cox proportional hazard models controlling for relevant demographic, clinicopathological and therapy characteristics. Results Out of 450 patients included in the study, 416 (92%) received trastuzumab and 34 (7.5%) lapatinib. As compared with the trastuzumab cohort, more patients in the lapatinib cohort had a trastuzumab-free interval

Background DD adjuvant CT improves disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in high-risk, hormone receptor positive BC. Luminal A and luminal B subtypes have different sensitivity to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy; however, their role in predicting DD efficacy in clinically high-risk setting is uncertain. This exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial (Del Mastro et al, Lancet 2015) evaluated DD efficacy according to IHC defined luminal subtypes. Methods In the GIM2 trial, pts with node-positive early BC were randomized to receive 4 cycles of (fluorouracil) epirubicin/cyclophosphamide every 2 (DD) or every 3 (standard interval [SI]) weeks followed by 4 cycles of DD or SI paclitaxel. Luminal A-like and luminal B-like BC were identified according to 13h St Gallen definition as having a Ki67 /=20% (luminal A-like), and a Ki67>/=20% and/or a PgR Results Of 2,003 pts enrolled in the GIM2 trial, 401 had luminal A-like and 657 luminal B-like BC. After a median follow-up of 8 years, DFS was 81.1% (95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 76.6-84.7) and 70.6% (66.6-74.1) in luminal A-like and B-like BC, respectively; OS was 91.6% (88.1-94.1) and 85% (81.7-87.7), respectively. There was no significant interaction between treatment and luminal subtypes (pinteraction=0.416 for DFS and pinteraction=0.313 for OS); however, the effect of DD CT appeared to be greater in luminal-B like BC (see table below). Table . 186P 8 year DFS SI 8 year DFS DD HR (95% CI) luminal A-like 81.6 80.6 0.86 (0.56-1.30) luminal B-like 66.8 74.7 0.74 (0.55-0.98) 8 year OS SI 8 year OS DD Luminal A-like 92.9 90.6 0.88 (0.47-1.67) luminal B-like 80.8 89.4 0.61 (0.40-0.93) Conclusions These long-term results confirm the prognostic value of IHC-defined luminal subtypes, with luminal B-like bearing a worse prognosis. In clinically high-risk, hormone receptor positive BC, luminal B-like subtype benefits more from DD CT both in terms of DFS and OS. Legal entity responsible for the study The authors. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure M. Lambertini: Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Theramex; Advisory / Consultancy: Teva. M. De Laurentiis: Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene. S. De Placido: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Celgene; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly. F. Montemurro: Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Novartis; Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, speaker honoraria, travel grant: Roche. L. Del Mastro: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Roche-Genentech; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background Although in clinical practice adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and endocrine therapy (ET) are administered sequentially in patients with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, the optimal timing, i.e. concurrent or sequential administration, of these treatments has been scarcely investigated. To better clarify this issue we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing these two modalities of administrations in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Knowledge and the proceedings of the major conferences with no date restriction up to March 2016. The summary risk estimates (pooled hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for DFS and OS were calculated using random effect models (DerSimonian and Laird method). Results A total of three randomized studies were eligible including 2021 breast cancer patients. Overall, 755 DFS events were observed, 365 in the sequential arm and 390 in the concomitant arm, with a pooled HR of 0.95 (95% CI = 0.76 to 1.18, P = 0.643). No association between timing of treatment and OS was observed (HR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.12, P = 0.529). Conclusion Our pooled analysis showed no association between the timing of administration of adjuvant CT and ET and DFS and OS in breast cancer patients candidates for both adjuvant treatments. Because of the small number of published trials, the lack of data on the timing with modern adjuvant treatments, i.e. taxane-containing CT and aromatase inhibitors, this topic remain still controversial and requires further studies to be clarified.

Background: Fertility and pregnancy issues are of key importance for young breast cancer patients. Despite several advances in the field, there are still multiple unmet needs and barriers in discussing and dealing with these concerns. To address the significant challenges related to fertility and pregnancy issues, the PREgnancy and FERtility (PREFER) study was developed as a national comprehensive program aiming to optimize care and improve knowledge around these topics. Methods: The PREFER study is a prospective cohort study conducted across several Italian institution affiliated with the Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) group evaluating patterns of care and clinical outcomes of young breast cancer patients dealing with fertility and pregnancy issues. It is composed of two distinctive studies: PREFER-FERTILITY and PREFER-PREGNANCY. The PREFER-FERTILITY study is enrolling premenopausal patients aged 18-45 years, diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer, who are candidates to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and not previously exposed to anticancer therapies. The primary objective is to obtain and centralize data about patients' preferences and choices towards the available fertility preserving procedures. The success and safety of these strategies and the hormonal changes during chemotherapy and study follow-up are secondary objectives. The PREFER-PREGNANCY study is enrolling survivors achieving a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer and patients diagnosed with pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC). The primary objectives are to obtain and centralize data about the management and clinical outcomes of these women. Patients' survival outcomes, and the fetal, obstetrical and paediatric care of their children are secondary objectives. For both studies, the initial planned recruitment period is 5 years and patients will remain in active follow-up for up to 15 years. The PREFER-FERTILITY study was first activated in November 2012, and the PREFER-PREGNANCY study in May 2013. Discussion: The PREFER study is expected to support and improve oncofertility counseling in Italy, to explore the real need of fertility preserving procedures, and to acquire prospectively more robust data on the efficacy and safety of the available strategies for fertility preservation, on the management of breast cancer survivors achieving a pregnancy and of women with PABC (including the possible short- and long-term complications in their children). Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02895165(Retrospectively registered in August 2016)., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

e13053Background: Most of HR+ MBC pts receive both hormonal therapy (HT) and chemotherapy (CT) during the course of their disease. According to international guidelines, HT should be preferred over CT in the first-line setting, restricting CT only to pts not responsive to HT or at risk of visceral crisis. Observational studies indicate that nearly 50% of this pts receive CT as first - line treatment. We aimed to evaluate if this behaviour does change in recent years. Methods: All consecutive MBC pts receiving a first-line treatment at 13 centers of GIM group (Gruppo Italiano Mammella) from 2000 to 2017 were registered. For the purpose of this analysis, we selected only HR+ MBC. The choice between first - line HT or CT was performed by the treating physician on the basis of pts and disease characteristics. The type of first line treatment (HT or CT) was analyzed according to four different cohorts: 2000 - 2005; 2006 - 2010; 2011 - 2013; 2014 - 2017. Results: 1709 pts with MBC were included in the GIM regis...

e13006Background: Approximately 20% of breast cancers (BC) are HER-2+. Trastuzumab (T) has dramatically changed the outcome, both in early and in advanced settings in HER2+BC. Pertuzumab (P) plus T...

Endocrine therapy is considered the cornerstone treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. Fulvestrant is a selective estrogen receptor down-regulator (SERD) with demonstrated activity and efficacy in the treatment of these patients.The present manuscript aims to review the mechanism of action of fulvestrant, the clinical efficacy data with the use of different dosages and schedules, and finally its role in association with other medications. Expert commentary: Fulvestrant is an active compound with an excellent safety profile for the treatment of women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, The combination of fulvestrant with targeted agents showed increased efficacy and is expected to become a new standard treatment. Results of two clinical trials (i.e. the FALCON and FEVEX trials) are awaited to better clarify the place of fulvestrant in the armamentarium of the available therapies for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Breast cancer in young women represents a public health problem with specific age-related issues to be faced by both patients and their treating physicians.This manuscript reviews the recent data on the medical management of young women with early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer.For women candidates to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens are standard of care. In high-risk patients, dose-dense regimens should be preferred; in women with triple-negative breast cancer and BRCA mutations, the addition of platinum compounds may also be considered. Several adjuvant endocrine therapy options have become available for the treatment of premenopausal women with early-stage luminal breast cancer. Specifically, young patients at low risk of relapse may be safely spared chemotherapy: endocrine therapy alone with tamoxifen for 5 years is the most appropriate treatment. In women at higher risk of relapse, ovarian function suppression is therapeutic: in this scenario, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) should be considered in addition to tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. To women concerned about the possible risk of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure, the use of temporary ovarian suppression with LHRHa should be proposed as a valid strategy to potentially preserve ovarian function and fertility.

Breast cancer is still the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women aged ≤40 years and the primary cause of death in this age group. The management of these patients needs a dedicated approach involving a multidisciplinary team that takes into account their treatment and survivorship issues. The present review aims to provide a perspective on the many challenges associated with treatment of young women with early breast cancer. We will focus on the standard (neo)adjuvant treatment, highlighting the paucity of age-specific results about the available genomic signatures, the groundbreaking landscape of adjuvant endocrine therapy and the relevant issue of the fertility preservation., SCOPUS: re.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published