The distributional data for the metabolic amino acid 3-hydroxy-L-kynurenine as a wing pigment in nymphalid butterflies would suggest taxonomic groupings essentially in contradiction with those resulting from more broad-scale morphological, breeding and behavioral studies; this indicates that the storage of this pigment is a taxonomically relatively unimportant unit character. The inherent danger of taxonomic misuse of single-compound chemical analysis is discussed, as is the significance of the use of the same chemical compound to achieve a given color by several divergent but mutually mimetic forms. The use of butterfly wing pigments to aid in the resolution of taxonomic problems has been appreciable in the last three decades, with pioneer work especially being done by Ford (1941, 1942, 1944a, 1944b, 1947) on anthoxanthins, pteridines, and other pigment classes. The present study of the distribution in Lepidoptera of the light yellow pigment 3-hydroxy-L-kynurenine (Fig. 2), a known amino acid on the metabolic pathway between tryptophan and nicotinic acid (a vitamin B), was approached with hopes of deriving some taxonomic conclusions from the resulting data (see Brown, 1965; Tokuyama and coworkers, 1967). The fact that this compound was clearly stored by certain well defined groups of butterflies, while clearly not present in other groups (even mimetic forms with visually identical coloration), permitted considerable enthusiasm for the possibility of unravelling some evolutionary problems, particularly in the large family Nymphalidae. The results of the distributional survey, summarized here, will be reported in detail elsewhere. Although they raise interesting questions about the chemical (and ultimately molecular and genetic) basis for mimicry (see below), they are disappointing in terms of taxonomy.' 3-Hydroxykynurenine is a normal metabolite almost certainly existing in small 1 The possible disappointments of chemotaxonomy are also becoming ever more evident in the study of the relationship of secondary plant products to taxonomy; see, for example, Swain (1963). quantities in all Lepidoptera; we have preliminarily confirmed its presence in a wide sampling of butterflies and moths by paper chromatography coupled with fluorescence and the ninhydrin test (Brown, 1965). However, it is stored in large quantities as wing and body pigment (up to 1.5% of total dry weight) only in certain groups of the diverse family Nymphalidae: namely, all species of the subgenus Heliconius (Heliconius),2 most genera of the subfamily Ithomiinae, and females of the genus Catonephele (Nymphalinae). A closely related but still unidentified compound is stored by most subspecies of Anaea (Hypna) clytemnestra of the Charaxinae, and by Colobura dirce and Tigridia (= Callizona) latifascia (Nymphalinae). We have found no evidence for the storage of the compound as pigment outside of the Nymphalidae or in any other neotropical genus within this grouping, comprising about 40% of the known species of butterflies. Specifically, it is absent from the subgenus Heliconius (Eueides), the subfamilies Danainae (including Indo-Australian species) and Acraeinae, and males of Catonephele as well of both sexes of the contiguous genus Myscelia. These latter are the groups of species most clearly allied with those which do store the compound as pigment. Furthermore, all of the groups mentioned (storing and non-storing) are mutually "mimetic" and possess light yellow 2 Albinistic or defective individuals, and even subspecies, containing no light yellow pigment at all are quite frequent in this group.