Search

Karynsa Cetin1, David S Ettinger2, Yong-jiang Hei3, Cynthia D O'Malley11Center for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; 2Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; 3Global Development, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USABackground: The role of histology in the targeted management of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has garnered renewed attention in recent years. We provide contemporary population-based estimates of survival and an assessment of important prognostic factors in stage IV NSCLC by major histologic subtype.Methods: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program, we stratified 51,749 incident stage IV NSCLC patients (1988–2003 with follow-up through 2006) by major histologic subtype. We used Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods to describe overall survival and the prognostic influence of select patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics for each histologic subgroup.Results: Survival was highest in patients with bronchioloalveolar adenocarcinoma (1-year survival: 29.1%) and lowest in those with large cell tumors (1-year survival: 12.8%). Diagnosis in later years, female gender, younger age, either Asian/Pacific Islander or Hispanic race/ethnicity, lower tumor grade, and surgery or beam radiation as part of first-line treatment were generally independently associated with a decreased risk of death, but the prognostic significance of some of these factors (age, ethnicity, tumor grade) varied according to histologic subtype.Conclusion: Findings demonstrate a poor prognosis across histologic subtypes in stage IV NSCLC patients but highlight differences in both absolute survival and the relative importance of select prognostic factors by histologic subclassification. More research using other sources of population-based data could help clarify the role of histology in the presentation, management, and prognosis of late-stage NSCLC.Keywords: epidemiology, nonsmall cell lung cancer, histology, survival

BackgroundA previous analysis of 113 National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) recommendations reported that NCCN frequently recommends beyond Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications (44 off-label recommendations) and claimed that the evidence for these recommendations was weak.MethodsIn order to determine the strength of the evidence, we carried out an in-depth re-analysis of the 44 off-label recommendations listed in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®).ResultsOf the 44 off-label recommendations, 14 were later approved by the FDA and/or are supported by randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. In addition, 13 recommendations were either very minor extrapolations from the FDA label (n = 8) or were actually on-label (n = 5). Of the 17 remaining extrapolations, 8 were for mechanism-based agents applied in rare cancers or subsets with few available treatment options (median response rate = 43%), 7 were based on non-RCT data showing significant efficacy (>50% response rates), and 2 were later removed from the NCCN Guidelines because newer therapies with better activity and/or safety became available.ConclusionOff-label drug use is a frequent component of care for patients with cancer in the United States. Our findings indicate that when the NCCN recommends beyond the FDA-approved indications, the strength of the evidence supporting such recommendations is robust, with a significant subset of these drugs later becoming FDA approved or supported by RCT. Recommendations without RCT data are often for mechanism-based drugs with high response rates in rare cancers or subsets without effective therapies.

Background: The use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas is controversial. This is a report of long-term (≥5 years) follow-up in patients with high-grade, high-risk soft tissue sarcomas treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy (RT), and adjuvant chemotherapy.Methods: Patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcoma≥8 cm in diameter of the extremities and body wall received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine) and preoperative RT (44 grays administered in split courses), and 3 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy (mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine).Results: Sixty-four of 66 patients were analyzed. After chemotherapy and RT, 61 patients had surgery; 58 had R0 resections (5 amputations), and 3 had R1 resections. Ninety-seven percent experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity, including 3 deaths. These toxicities were short term. With a median follow-up of 7.7 years in surviving patients, the 5-year rates of locoregional failure (including amputation), and distant metastasis were 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.8-32.6) and 28.1% (95% CI, 17.0-39.2). The most common site of metastasis was lung. Estimated 5-year rates of disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival were 56.1% (95% CI, 43.9-68.3), 64.1% (95% CI, 52.3-75.8), and 71.2% (95% CI, 60.0-82.5), respectively.Conclusions: Although the toxicity was significant, it was limited in its course and for the most part resolved by 1 year. The long-term outcome was better than might be expected in such high-risk tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is a heterogeneous group of diseases encompassing both stage IIIA and IIIB disease. The treatme1lt options vary, including surgery, chemotherapy, neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation, definitive chemoradiation, radiation, and various combinations of the above. Optimal therapy for each patient group is controversial; however, previous trials have shown efficacy of various treatments for different stages. Surgery as initial therapy is beneficial for patients with stage T3, N1 or T3-4, N0-1 disease due to satellite lesions within the same lung. Chemotherapy should be used for diseases minimally involving the mediastinal lymph nodes, whereas concurrent induction chemoradiation is a good option for bulky nodal disease prior to planning a resection. Concurrent definitive chemoradiation or definitive radiation should be reserved for patients who are not candidates for a surgical resection. Most importantly, the treatment strategy for stage IIIA/IIIB disease should involve a multimodality approach individualized to the patient's disease stage, age, underlying medical conditions, and performance status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Goals Of Work: This study investigated physician's attitudes toward the relative importance of chemotherapeutic and antiemetic efficacy in different clinical scenarios.Materials and Methods: Oncologists in the USA and four European countries completed an online stated-choice survey consisting of three hypothetical treatment choices for each of two patient types. Each hypothetical treatment alternative included both chemotherapy and antiemetic regimens. The two hypothetical patient types were (1) a 48-year-old woman with locoregional infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast and (2) a 78-year-old man with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung and multiple liver metastases. In each choice question, oncologists were asked to select the better combination of chemotherapy and antiemetic prophylaxis between two treatment alternatives.Main Results: Five hundred fifty-seven oncologists completed the survey. For the adjuvant breast cancer patient, the most aggressive chemotherapy is consistently the most important treatment consideration in all countries. For the advanced lung cancer patient, the most aggressive chemotherapy, the less aggressive chemotherapy, and the most aggressive antiemetic prophylaxis are of similar importance in most countries.Conclusions: Physicians appear more likely to prescribe a more aggressive chemotherapy regimen for a younger patient with a perceived curable tumor, regardless of the emetogenic properties of the chemotherapy. Symptom management is more of a concern and chemotherapeutic efficacy relatively less of a priority in an older patient with advanced disease for whom chemotherapy is not curative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE Six of the most active chemotherapy agents in small cell lung cancer were administered sequentially in a weekly fashion in an attempt to optimize the dose and the number of agents received over a 12-week period. The purpose of this study was to estimate the efficacy and to characterize the toxicity of this approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-six patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer received weekly treatments with cisplatin and etoposide (weeks 1, 5, and 11), cyclophosphamide (weeks 2, 7, and 10), vincristine (weeks 2, 4, 7, 8, 10, and 12), methotrexate (weeks 3, 6, and 9), and doxorubicin (weeks 4, 8, and 12). Patients achieving a partial response received a second 12-week course. Patients achieving a complete response received prophylactic cranial radiation. RESULTS Twenty-nine of the 36 patients completed the initial 12-week program over a median of 16 weeks. Hematologic toxicity was most prominent, with two deaths from sepsis and 31 patients having grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. The overall response rate was 85%, with 33% of patients achieving a complete response. The median survival was 10.5 months, and the median time to progression was 8.2 months. DISCUSSION This 12-week program, consisting of administration of six active agents for small cell lung cancer, caused significant myelosuppression that resulted in significant treatment delays and dose reductions. Although a high response rate was achieved, the median overall survival of 10.5 months was not significantly longer than expected from other standard two-to three-drug regimens, (Cancer J Sci Am 2000;6:34-59) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary disease management, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. The panel has updated the list of recommended targeted therapies based on recent FDA approvals and clinical data. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on treatment recommendations for advanced or metastatic NSCLC with actionable molecular biomarkers.

While tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have shown remarkable efficacy in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), clinical outcomes vary and acquired resistance remains a significant challenge. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who had clinico-genomic data independently collected from two academic institutions (n = 309). This was paired with a large-scale genomic cohort of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who underwent liquid biopsies (n = 1,118). Somatic co-mutations in TP53 and loss-of-function alterations in CDKN2A/B were most commonly identified (24.1% and 22.5%, respectively in the clinical cohort), each of which was independently associated with inferior overall survival (HR: 2.58; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.62-4.09 and HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.17-3.17, respectively). Tumors harboring EML4-ALK variant 3 (v3) were not associated with specific co-alterations but were more likely to develop ALK resistance mutations, particularly G1202R and I1171N (OR: 4.11; P < 0.001 and OR: 2.94; P = 0.026, respectively), and had inferior progression-free survival on first-line TKI (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.03-2.25). Non-v3 tumors were associated with L1196M resistance mutation (OR: 4.63; P < 0.001). EML4-ALK v3 and somatic co-alterations in TP53 and CDKN2A/B are associated with inferior clinical outcomes. v3 status is also associated with specific patterns of clinically important ALK resistance mutations. These tumor-intrinsic features may inform rational selection and optimization of first-line and consolidative therapy., Significance: In a large-scale, contemporary cohort of patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, we evaluated molecular characteristics and their impact on acquired resistance mutations and clinical outcomes. Our findings that certain ALK variants and co-mutations are associated with differential survival and specific TKI-relevant resistance patterns highlight potential molecular underpinnings of the heterogenous response to ALK TKIs and nominate biomarkers that may inform patient selection for first-line and consolidative therapies., (© 2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objectives: Understand from a real-world cohort the unique clinical and genomic determinants of a durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with NSCLC who received any ICI-based regimen as first or second line therapy. Long-term responders (LTR) achieved an overall survival (OS) ≥ 3 years from time of treatment start, while nonresponders (NR) were patients who had an OS of 6 to 12 months from time of treatment start. Clinical and demographic covariables were collected from electronic medical records. Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test were used to analyze the association of a long-term response to ICI in relation to clinical and genomic variables. All P-values were considered significant at P-value < .05., Results: A total of 72 patients were included in this study (LTR n = 37, NR n = 35). There were no significant differences in age, sex, race, and BMI between groups. The presence of liver metastases at the time of ICI initiation and PD-L1 status were not associated with LTR to ICIs. Patients in the LTR were more likely to experience irAEs at 3-,6- and 12-months. KRAS mutant tumors were numerically more common in the LTR group (n = 13 vs. 8)., Conclusion: We observe no strong clinical and biomarkers of a prolonged response to ICIs. Additional large prospective cohort studies are needed to investigate the genomic footprint of long-term responders., Competing Interests: Disclosure PG has no disclosures. JCM is a consultant for Regeneron, Johnson & Johnson and Doximity. JM receives research funding to the institution from Merck. MH is a consultant for Regeneron and MJH Life Sciences. MZG has no disclosures. DSE has no disclosures. JF receives research funding to the institution from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers and Pfizer. JF is a consultant for Regeneron, Coherus, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers, Merck, Takeda and Eli Lilly. PF received research funding to the institution from AstraZeneca, BMS, Corvus, Kyowa, Novartis and Regeneron. PF is a consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi, F-Star, G1, Genentech, Janssen, Iteos, Merck, Sanofi, Novartis and Surface. CH is a consultant for Amgen and AstraZeneca. CH receives research funding to the institution form AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, and BMS. VL is a consultant for Seattle Genetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Guardant Health, Takeda and Anheart Therapeutics. VL receives funding to the institution from BMS, Merck, Seattle Genetics and AstraZeneca. BL is a consultant for Genentech, Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Mirati, Amgen, Merck and Sanofi. VA receives research funding to Johns Hopkins University from Astra Zeneca, Personal Genome Diagnostics and Delfi Diagnostics and has received research funding to Johns Hopkins University from Bristol-Myers Squibb in the past 5 years. V.A. is an advisory board member for Neogenomics and V.A. is an inventor on patent applications (63/276,525, 17/779,936, 16/312,152, 16/341,862, 17/047,006, and 17/598,690) submitted by Johns Hopkins University related to cancer genomic analyses, ctDNA therapeutic response monitoring and immunogenomic features of response to immunotherapy that have been licensed to 1 or more entities. Under the terms of these license agreements, the University and inventors are entitled to fees and royalty distributions. JRB is an advisor for Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sanofi, Regeneron, Janssen and Johnson & Johnson. JRB also receives to the institution research funding from AstraZeneca and BMS. JRB is also part of the Data and Safety monitory board of Janssen. KM receives honoraria from AstraZeneca. KM is a consultant for AstraZeneca, Amgen, Puma Biotechnology, Janssen, Mirati Therapeutics, Mirati Therapeutics and Regeneron. KM receives research funding to the institution from Mirati, BMS, AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that originates from the mesothelial surfaces of the pleura and other sites, and is estimated to occur in approximately 3,500 people in the United States annually. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type and represents approximately 85% of these cases. The NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with pleural mesothelioma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight significant updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural, including revised guidance on disease classification and systemic therapy options.

Purpose: Although immunotherapy is the mainstay of therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), robust biomarkers of clinical response are lacking. The heterogeneity of clinical responses together with the limited value of radiographic response assessments to timely and accurately predict therapeutic effect-especially in the setting of stable disease-calls for the development of molecularly informed real-time minimally invasive approaches. In addition to capturing tumor regression, liquid biopsies may be informative in capturing immune-related adverse events (irAE)., Experimental Design: We investigated longitudinal changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with metastatic NSCLC who received immunotherapy-based regimens. Using ctDNA targeted error-correction sequencing together with matched sequencing of white blood cells and tumor tissue, we tracked serial changes in cell-free tumor load (cfTL) and determined molecular response. Peripheral T-cell repertoire dynamics were serially assessed and evaluated together with plasma protein expression profiles., Results: Molecular response, defined as complete clearance of cfTL, was significantly associated with progression-free (log-rank P = 0.0003) and overall survival (log-rank P = 0.01) and was particularly informative in capturing differential survival outcomes among patients with radiographically stable disease. For patients who developed irAEs, on-treatment peripheral blood T-cell repertoire reshaping, assessed by significant T-cell receptor (TCR) clonotypic expansions and regressions, was identified on average 5 months prior to clinical diagnosis of an irAE., Conclusions: Molecular responses assist with the interpretation of heterogeneous clinical responses, especially for patients with stable disease. Our complementary assessment of the peripheral tumor and immune compartments provides an approach for monitoring of clinical benefits and irAEs during immunotherapy., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Concomitant autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) can add morbidity and complicate treatment decisions for patients with lung cancer. We evaluated the tumour characteristics at diagnosis and clinical outcomes in lung cancer patients with or without ARD., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 10 963 patients with lung cancer, treated at Johns Hopkins. Clinical data including tumour characteristics and outcomes were extracted from the cancer registry. Data on patients' history of 20 ARD were extracted from the electronic medical record. Logistic regression was used to compare tumour characteristics between those with and without ARD; Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were performed to compare survival outcomes., Results: ARD was present in 3.6% of patients (n=454). The mean age at diagnosis was 69 (SD 10) and 68 (SD 12) in patients with and without ARD (p=0.02). Female sex and smoking history were significantly associated with a history of ARD (OR: 1.75, OR: 1.46, p<0.05). Patients with ARD were more likely to be diagnosed with stage 1 lung cancer (36.8% vs 26.9%, p<0.001) and with smaller tumour size (OR: 0.76, p=0.01), controlling for sex, race and histology. Notably, lung cancer patients with ARD had a significantly prolonged median overall survival (OS) (7.11 years vs 1.7 years, p<0.001), independent of stage., Conclusion: Patients with ARD and lung cancer had better OS compared with their counterparts, independent of cancer stage and treatments and were less likely to have advanced stage lung cancer at diagnosis. Additional studies are needed to investigate the differential immunological anti-tumour immune activity and genomic variations in patients with and without ARD., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PG has no disclosures. JCM is a consultant/advisory: Regeneron, Johnson & Johnson, Doximity. JCM receives research funding to Merck. KAM has research funding from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mirati and is a consultant and serves on the advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Regeneron. SCS is a consultant for Amgen, Genentech, Foundation Medicine. JLF is a consultant to Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, Genentech, Takeda, Regeneron, Coherus, Jansen, Merck and Bristol-Myers Squibb. JLF receives research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer. VKL is a consultant to Seattle Genetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Guardant Health, Takeda and Anheart Therapeutics. VKL receives funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Seattle Genetics and Astra Zeneca. CLH is a consultant to Amgen and AstraZeneca. CLH receives research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb. DSE is an advisor to Beyond Spring and Chair of the NCCN NSCLC Guideline. BPL is a consultant and on the advisory board for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Genentech, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Guardant 360, Mirati, Amgen, Foundation one. PMF receives research funding from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus, Kyowa, Novartis, Regeneron. PMF is a consultant to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi, F-Star, G1, Genentech, Janssen, Iteos, Merck, Sanofi, Novartis, Surface. PMF is a DSMB member for Polaris. AAS obtains research funding from Arena Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Eicos Sciences, Kadmon Corporation. CM is a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim and Department of Justice Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. JB has research funding from AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb, consulting for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Genentech/Roche, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Bluprint, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Regneron and Sanofi, and honoraria from Janssen. LCC has research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer originating in mesothelial surfaces of the peritoneum, pleura, and other sites. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) focus on peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM). The NCCN Guidelines for PeM provide recommendations for workup, diagnosis, and treatment of primary as well as previously treated PeM. The diagnosis of PeM may be delayed because PeM mimics other diseases and conditions and because the disease is so rare. The pathology section was recently updated to include new information about markers used to identify mesothelioma, which is difficult to diagnose. The term "malignant" is no longer used to classify mesotheliomas, because all mesotheliomas are now defined as malignant.

Importance: Pathologic complete response (pCR) may be associated with prognosis in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS)., Objective: We sought to determine the prognostic significance of pCR on survival outcomes in STS for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 9514) or preoperative image-guided radiotherapy alone (RT, RTOG 0630) and provide a long-term update of RTOG 0630., Design, Setting, and Participants: RTOG has completed 2 multi-institutional, nonrandomized phase 2 clinical trials for patients with localized STS. One hundred forty-three eligible patients from RTOG 0630 (n = 79) and RTOG 9514 (n = 64) were included in this ancillary analysis of pCR and 79 patients from RTOG 0630 were evaluated for long-term outcomes., Intervention: Patients in trial 9514 received CT interdigitated with RT, whereas those in trial 0630 received preoperative RT alone., Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) and P values were estimated by multivariable Cox model stratified by study, where possible; otherwise, P values were calculated by stratified log-rank test. Analysis took place between December 14, 2016, to April 13, 2017., Results: Overall there were 42 (53.2%) men; 68 (86.1%) were white; with a mean (SD) age of 59.6 (14.5) years. For RTOG 0630, at median follow-up of 6.0 years, there was 1 new in-field recurrence and 1 new distant failure since the initial report. From both studies, 123 patients were evaluable for pCR: 14 of 51 (27.5%) in trial 9514 and 14 of 72 (19.4%) in trial 0630 had pCR. Five-year OS was 100% for patients with pCR vs 76.5% (95% CI, 62.3%-90.8%) and 56.4% (95% CI, 43.3%-69.5%) for patients with less than pCR in trials 9514 and 0630, respectively. Overall, pCR was associated with improved OS (P = .01) and DFS (HR, 4.91; 95% CI, 1.51-15.93; P = .008) relative to less than pCR. Five-year local failure rate was 0% in patients with pCR vs 11.7% (95% CI, 3.6%-25.1%) and 9.1% (95% CI, 3.3%-18.5%) for patients with less than pCR in 9514 and 0630, respectively. Histologic types other than leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, and myxofibrosarcoma were associated with worse OS (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.12-4.45)., Conclusions and Relevance: This ancillary analysis of 2 nonrandomized clinical trials found that pCR was associated with improved survival in patients with STS and should be considered as a prognostic factor of clinical outcomes for future studies., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: RTOG 0630 (NCT00589121); RTOG 9514 (NCT00002791).

The NCCN Guidelines for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for management of disease in patients with NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on neoadjuvant and adjuvant (also known as perioperative) systemic therapy options for eligible patients with resectable NSCLC.

Introduction: Anti-PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). The clinical features, survival, and burden of toxicities of patients with aNSCLC alive >1 year from ICI initiation are poorly understood., Materials and Methods: We defined ICI survivors as patients alive >1 year after ICI start and retrospectively reviewed demographics, treatment, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Long-term irAEs were defined as ongoing irAEs lasting >1 year; burden of toxicity measures were based on percentage of days a patient experienced toxicity. Using linear and logistic regression, we evaluated association between demographics and disease characteristics with burden of toxicity., Results: We identified 114 ICI survivors from 317 patients with aNSCLC. Half (52%) experienced an irAE of any grade, and 23.7% developed long-term irAEs. More ICI survivors with irAES in the first year had never smoked (P = .018) or received ICIs as frontline therapy (P = .015). The burden of toxicity in the first year significantly correlated with the burden of toxicity afterward (ρ = 0.72; P < .001). No patients with progressive disease had a high burden of toxicity, and they experienced 30.6% fewer days with toxicity than those with stable disease. Increased duration of therapy was associated with higher odds of experiencing toxicity. Half of ICI survivors with irAEs were still receiving treatment for unresolved irAEs at time of death or last follow-up., Conclusion: Significant proportions of ICI survivors have unresolved long-term toxicities. These data support a growing need to understand long-term toxicity to optimize management of those treated with ICIs., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Prognostic risk factors for completely resected stage IA non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) have advanced minimally over recent decades. Although several biomarkers have been found to be associated with cancer recurrence, their added value to TNM staging and tumor grade are unclear. Methods: Features of preoperative low-dose CT image and histologic findings of hematoxylin- and eosin-stained tissue sections of resected lung tumor specimens were extracted from 182 stage IA NSCLC patients in the National Lung Screening Trial. These features were combined to predict the risk of tumor recurrence or progression through integrated deep learning evaluation (IDLE). Added values of IDLE to TNM staging and tumor grade in progression risk prediction and risk stratification were evaluated. Results: The 5-year AUC of IDLE was 0.817 ± 0.037 as compared to the AUC = 0.561 ± 0.042 and 0.573 ± 0.044 from the TNM stage and tumor grade, respectively. The IDLE score was significantly associated with cancer recurrence (p < 0.0001) even after adjusting for TNM staging and tumor grade. Synergy between chest CT image markers and histological markers was the driving force of the deep learning algorithm to produce a stronger prognostic predictor. Conclusions: Integrating markers from preoperative CT images and pathologist’s readings of resected lung specimens through deep learning can improve risk stratification of stage 1A NSCLC patients over TNM staging and tumor grade alone. Our study suggests that combining markers from nonoverlapping platforms can increase the cancer risk prediction accuracy.

Introduction: The magnitude of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy may be sex-dependent, as females have lower response rates and decreased survival after ICI monotherapy. The mechanisms underlying this sex dimorphism in ICI response are unknown, and may be related to sex-driven differences in the immunogenomic landscape of tumors that shape anti-tumor immune responses in the context of therapy., Methods: To investigate the association of immunogenic mutations with HLA haplotypes, we leveraged whole exome sequence data and HLA genotypes from 482 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). To explore sex-specific genomic features linked with ICI response, we analyzed whole exome sequence data from patients with NSCLC treated with ICI. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), HLA class I and II restricted immunogenic missense mutation (IMM) load, and mutational smoking signature were defined for each tumor. IMM load was combined with HLA class I and II haplotypes and correlated with therapeutic response and survival following ICI treatment. We examined rates of durable clinical benefit (DCB) for at least six months from ICI treatment initiation. Findings were validated utilizing whole exome sequence data from an independent cohort of ICI treated NSCLC., Results: Analysis of whole exome sequence data from NSCLC tumors of females and males revealed that germline HLA class II diversity (≥9 unique HLA alleles) was associated with higher tumor class II IMM load in females (p=0.01) and not in males (p=0.64). Similarly, in tumors of female patients, somatic HLA class II loss of heterozygosity was associated with increased IMM load (p=0.01) while this association was not observed in tumors in males (p=0.20). In females, TMB (p=0.005), class I IMM load (p=0.005), class II IMM load (p=0.004), and mutational smoking signature (p<0.001) were significantly higher in tumors responding to ICI as compared to non-responding tumors. In contrast, among males, there was no significant association between DCB and any of these features. When IMM was considered in the context of HLA zygosity, high MHC-II restricted IMM load and high HLA class II diversity was significantly associated with overall survival in males (p=0.017)., Conclusions: Inherent sex-driven differences in immune surveillance affect the immunogenomic determinants of response to ICI and likely mediate the dimorphic outcomes with ICI therapy. Deeper understanding of the selective pressures and mechanisms of immune escape in tumors in males and females can inform patient selection strategies and can be utilized to further hone immunotherapy approaches in cancer., Competing Interests: VA receives research funding to the institution from Astra Zeneca and has received research funding to her institution from Bristol-Myers Squibb in the past 5 years. SS has served in a consulting role for Genentech/Roche. KM has received research funding to the institution from Mirati and Bristol Myers Squibb, and she has served in a consulting role for Amgen, Janssen, Mirati, AstraZeneca and Puma. VL has received research funding to the institution from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and SeaGen and he has served in a consulting role for Takeda, SeaGen, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Guardant Health and Takeda. JM has received research funding to the institution from Merck via the Conquer Cancer Young Investigators Award, and has served in a consulting role for MJH Life Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, and Doximity. JF has received research funding to the institution from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Bristol Myers Squibb, and has served in a consulting role for Genentech/Roche, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Merck, Takeda, Coherus, Regeneron, and Pfizer. BL has served in a consulting role for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen, Takeda, Genentech/Roche, Eli Lilly, Mirati Therapeutics, and Guardant. DE has served in a consulting role for Beyond Spring Pharmaceuticals. CH has received research funding to the institution from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and GlaxoSmithKline, and has served in a consulting role for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Jannsen and GlaxoSmithKline. JB has received research funding to the institution from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Merck, RAPT Therapeutics Inc and Revolution Medicines, has served in a consulting role for Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Genentech/Roche, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sanofi and Regeneron, and is in the Data and Safety Monitoring Board/Committees of GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi. PF has received research funding to the institution from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Corvus, Kyowa, and has served as a consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Iteos, Janssen, and as a data safety monitoring board member for Polaris and Flame Therapeutics. JN has received research funding from MSD, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Genentech/Roche, Novartis, has served in a consultant/advisory role for Merck, MSD, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Pfizer, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Kaleido Biosciences, Amgen and Mirati Therapeutics, and is in the Data and Safety Monitoring Board/Committee of Daiichi Sankyo. Under a license agreement between Genentech and the Johns Hopkins University, XS and RK and the University are entitled to royalty distributions related to technology described in the study discussed in this publication. This arrangement has been reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Scott, Shao, Niknafs, Balan, Pereira, Marrone, Lam, Murray, Feliciano, Levy, Ettinger, Hann, Brahmer, Forde, Karchin, Naidoo and Anagnostou.)

The NCCN Guidelines for Lung Cancer Screening recommend criteria for selecting individuals for screening and provide recommendations for evaluation and follow-up of lung nodules found during initial and subsequent screening. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Lung Cancer Screening.

Introduction: With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for cancer, there is a growing burden on the healthcare system to provide care for the toxicities associated with these agents. Herein, we aim to identify and describe the distribution of encounters seen in an urgent care setting for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the clinical outcomes from irAE management. Methods: Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment data were collected retrospectively from encounters at an oncology Urgent Care Clinic (UCC) from a single tertiary center for upper aerodigestive malignancies from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics with odds ratios for associations between patient features and hospitalization after UCC evaluation. Results: We identified 494 encounters from 289 individual patients over the study period. A history of ICI therapy was noted in 34% (n = 170/494) of encounters and 29 encounters (29/170, 17%) were confirmed and treated as irAEs. For those treated for irAEs, the majority (n = 19/29; 66%) were discharged home. Having an irAE was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization compared to non-irAEs (OR 5.66; 95% CI 2.15−14.89; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this single institution experience, the majority of UCC encounters for confirmed irAEs were safely managed within the UCC. In ICI-treated patients, having an irAE was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization versus non-irAEs.

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommended management for patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. Patients with metastatic lung cancer who are eligible for targeted therapies or immunotherapies are now surviving longer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on targeted therapies for patients with metastatic NSCLC and actionable mutations.

Introduction: Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a serious toxicity of anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 immunotherapy. Whether pretreatment differences in pulmonary function exist in patients who develop CIP is unknown. We analyzed the pulmonary function tests (PFTs) of patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to evaluate whether pretreatment lung function was associated with CIP development., Methods: Patients were included if they completed greater than or equal to 1 PFT within 2 years preceding ICI initiation. CIP status (CIP+: developed CIP, CIP-: did not develop CIP) was determined clinically. Generalized estimating equation-based linear regression was used to evaluate the effects of time and CIP on lung function. Primary outcomes included the following: percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1pp), percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVCpp), and FEV1/FVC., Results: A total of 43 patients (34 CIP-, 9 CIP+) with 79 PFTs (59 CIP-, 20 CIP+) were included. CIP+ patients had a 21.7% lower pretreatment FEV1pp compared with the CIP- group (95% confidence interval: -38.6 to -4.7). No statistically significant differences in FVCpp or FEV1/FVC were observed. The prevalence of obstructive lung disease was similar in both groups at 67% and 62% for the CIP+ and CIP- cohorts, as was the prevalence of current/former smoking at 100% and 93%, respectively., Conclusions: Pretherapy differences in lung function were evident between patients who did and did not develop CIP, though the prevalence of obstructive lung disease was similar. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings, inform potential risk factors for CIP, and investigate the effects of ICI treatment and CIP on pulmonary function in patients with NSCLC., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Objective: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common primary tumor to develop brain metastasis. Prognostic markers are needed to better determine survival after neurosurgical resection of intracranial disease. Given the importance of mutation subtyping in determining systemic therapy and overall prognosis of NSCLC, the authors examined the prognostic value of mutation status for postresection survival of patients with NSCLC brain metastasis., Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed all cases of NSCLC brain metastasis with available molecular testing data that were resected by a single surgeon at a single academic center from January 2009 to February 2019. Mutation status, demographic characteristics, clinical factors, and treatments were analyzed. Association between predictive variables and overall survival after neurosurgery was determined with Cox regression., Results: Of the included patients (n = 84), 40% were male, 76% were smokers, the mean ± SD Karnofsky Performance Status was 85 ± 14, and the mean ± SD age at surgery was 63 ± 11 years. In total, 23%, 26%, and 4% of patients had EGFR, KRAS, and ALK/ROS1 alterations, respectively. On multivariate analysis, survival of patients with EGFR (HR 0.495, p = 0.0672) and KRAS (HR 1.380, p = 0.3617) mutations were not significantly different from survival of patients with wild-type (WT) tumor. However, the subgroup of patients with EGFR mutation who also received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy had significantly prolonged survival (HR 0.421, p = 0.0471). In addition, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (HR 0.409, p = 0.0177) and resected tumor diameter < 3 cm (HR 0.431, p = 0.0146) were also significantly associated with prolonged survival, but Graded Prognostic Assessment score ≤ 1.0 (HR 2.269, p = 0.0364) was significantly associated with shortened survival., Conclusions: Patients with EGFR mutation who receive TKI therapy may have better survival after resection of brain metastasis than patients with WT tumor. These results may inform counseling and decision-making regarding the appropriateness of resection of NSCLC brain metastasis.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) address all aspects of management for NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines regarding targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and their respective biomarkers.

Importance: The spectrum of individual immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been reported widely, and their development is associated with improved patient survival across tumor types. The spectrum and impact on survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop multisystem irAEs from ICIs, has not been described., Objective: To characterize multisystem irAEs, their association with survival, and risk factors for multisystem irAE development., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study carried out in 5 academic institutions worldwide included 623 patients with stage III/IV NSCLC, treated with anti-PD-(L)1 ICIs alone or in combination with another anticancer agent between January 2007 and January 2019., Exposures: Anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy or combinations., Main Outcomes and Measures: Multisystem irAEs were characterized by combinations of individual irAEs or organ system involved, separated by ICI-monotherapy or combinations. Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in PFS and OS between irAE groups were assessed by multivariable models. Risk for multisystem irAE was estimated as odds ratios by multivariable logistic regression., Results: The 623 patients included in the study were mostly men (60%, n = 375) and White (77%, n = 480). The median (range) age was 66 (58-73) years, and 148 patients (24%) developed a single irAE, whereas 58 (9.3%) developed multisystem irAEs. The most common multisystem irAE patterns in patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were pneumonitis thyroiditis (n = 7, 14%), hepatitis thyroiditis (n = 5, 10%), dermatitis pneumonitis (n = 5, 10%), and dermatitis thyroiditis (n = 4, 8%). Favorable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (ECOG PS = 0/1 vs 2; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94; P = .04) and longer ICI duration (aOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P < .001) were independent risk factors for development of multisystem irAEs. Patients with 1 irAE and multisystem irAEs demonstrated incrementally improved OS (adjusted hazard ratios [aHRs], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66-1.12; P = .26; and aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.85; P = . 005, respectively) and PFS (aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P = .001; and aHR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28-0.55; P < .001, respectively) vs patients with no irAEs, in multivariable models adjusting for ICI duration., Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter cohort study, development of multisystem irAEs was associated with improved survival in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs.

Background: Here, we investigated radiological responses following chemotherapy alone as compared to both radiation/chemotherapy (chemoRT) in patients with thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) who did not receive upfront surgery., Methods: TETs treated at a tertiary academic cancer center between January 2007 and July 2018 were identified. Patients received chemotherapy or chemoRT as initial therapy and pre- and post-treatment scans were available. Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Cox proportional hazards method were used to compare clinical details and survival between groups. The primary outcome was change in tumor size, which was compared between groups using linear mixed-effects regression models, adjusting for baseline tumor size, age, and histology., Results: A total of 24 of 114 patients with TETs identified met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients had 67% thymoma (67%, n = 16) and AJCC8 III-IVA disease (58%, n = 14). Median age was 58.5 years (range: 33-76), median initial tumor volume was 187.1 cc (range: 28.7-653.6) and diameter was 8.5 cm (range: 4.5-14.3). Half of the patients received upfront chemotherapy (n = 12: 83% cisplatin/adriamycin/cyclophosphamide) or chemoRT (n = 12: 58% carboplatin/paclitaxel; median RT dose: 63 Gy [range: 60-70 Gy]). At a median imaging follow-up of 15 months (range: 0-86): ChemoRT was associated with increased average radiological response compared to chemotherapy alone (volume: -47.0 cc more, P < 0.001; diameter: -0.8 cm more, P = 0.03). In eight patients who received chemotherapy, 33% saw further tumor shrinkage (median volume: -42.3%, P = 0.03; diameter: -3.0%, P = 0.049) with additional radiation/chemoradiation. Median survival increased for patients ultimately receiving surgery versus those who did not (46 month, range: 16-127 vs. 14 month, range: 6-82; P < 0.01)., Conclusions: ChemoRT produced a greater radiologic response compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with TETs not suitable for upfront resection., Key Points: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: We found that chemoRT was associated with a greater radiologic response compared to patients who received chemotherapy alone., What This Study Adds: What this study adds: In patients with TET not amenable to upfront resection, chemoRT may be a feasible strategy for cytoreduction., (© 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Despite progress in immunotherapy, identifying patients that respond has remained a challenge. Through analysis of whole-exome and targeted sequence data from 5,449 tumors, we found a significant correlation between tumor mutation burden (TMB) and tumor purity, suggesting that low tumor purity tumors are likely to have inaccurate TMB estimates. We developed a new method to estimate a corrected TMB (cTMB) that was adjusted for tumor purity and more accurately predicted outcome to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). To identify improved predictive markers together with cTMB, we performed whole-exome sequencing for 104 lung tumors treated with ICB. Through comprehensive analyses of sequence and structural alterations, we discovered a significant enrichment in activating mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) genes in nonresponding tumors in three immunotherapy treated cohorts. An integrated multivariable model incorporating cTMB, RTK mutations, smoking-related mutational signature and human leukocyte antigen status provided an improved predictor of response to immunotherapy that was independently validated.

The NCCN Guidelines for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) address all aspects of management for NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates in immunotherapy. For the 2020 update, all of the systemic therapy regimens have been categorized using a new preference stratification system; certain regimens are now recommended as "preferred interventions," whereas others are categorized as either "other recommended interventions" or "useful under certain circumstances."

Background: Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a highly morbid complication of immune checkpoint immunotherapy (ICI), one which precludes the continuation of ICI. Yet, the mechanistic underpinnings of CIP are unknown., Methods: To better understand the mechanism of lung injury in CIP, we prospectively collected bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples in ICI-treated patients with (n=12) and without CIP (n=6), prior to initiation of first-line therapy for CIP (high dose corticosteroids. We analyzed BAL immune cell populations using a combination of traditional multicolor flow cytometry gating, unsupervised clustering analysis and BAL supernatant cytokine measurements., Results: We found increased BAL lymphocytosis, predominantly CD4+ T cells, in CIP. Specifically, we observed increased numbers of BAL central memory T-cells (Tcm), evidence of Type I polarization, and decreased expression of CTLA-4 and PD-1 in BAL Tregs, suggesting both activation of pro-inflammatory subsets and an attenuated suppressive phenotype. CIP BAL myeloid immune populations displayed enhanced expression of IL-1β and decreased expression of counter-regulatory IL-1RA. We observed increased levels of T cell chemoattractants in the BAL supernatant, consistent with our pro-inflammatory, lymphocytic cellular landscape., Conclusion: We observe several immune cell subpopulations that are dysregulated in CIP, which may represent possible targets that could lead to therapeutics for this morbid immune related adverse event.

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between radiotherapy (RT), in particular chest RT, and development of immune-related (IR) pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)., Patients and Methods: Between June 2011 and July 2017, NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 at a tertiary-care academic cancer center were identified. Patient, treatment, prior RT (intent, technique, timing, courses), and IR pneumonitis details were collected. Treating investigators diagnosed IR pneumonitis clinically. Diagnostic IR pneumonitis scans were overlaid with available chest RT plans to describe IR pneumonitis in relation to prior chest RT. We evaluated associations between patient, treatment, RT details, and development of IR pneumonitis by Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests., Results: Of the 188 NSCLC patients we identified, median follow-up was 6.78 (range, 0.30-79.3) months and median age 66 (range, 39-91) years; 54% (n = 102) were male; and 42% (n = 79) had stage I-III NSCLC at initial diagnosis. Patients received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy (n = 127, 68%) or PD-1/PD-L1-based combinations (n = 61, 32%). In the entire cohort, 70% (132/188) received any RT, 53% (100/188) chest RT, and 37% (70/188) curative-intent chest RT. Any grade IR pneumonitis occurred in 19% (36/188; 95% confidence interval, 13.8-25.6). Of those who developed IR pneumonitis and received chest RT (n = 19), patients were more likely to have received curative-intent versus palliative-intent chest RT (17/19, 89%, vs. 2/19, 11%; P = .051). Predominant IR pneumonitis appearances were ground-glass opacities outside high-dose chest RT regions., Conclusion: No RT parameter was significantly associated with IR pneumonitis. On subset analysis of patients who developed IR pneumonitis and who had received prior chest RT, IR pneumonitis was more common in patients who received curative-intent chest RT. Attention should be paid to NSCLC patients receiving curative-intent RT followed by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced NSCLC, there is increasing recognition of immune-related adverse events associated with ICI use. We recently reported increased incidence of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) in ICI-treated NSCLC patients. Since development of immune-related adverse events in other organ systems has been associated with either no change or even improvement in tumor response/cancer outcomes, we sought to better understand the impact of CIP development on overall survival in ICI-treated NSCLC patients. Using baseline and follow-up data collected on a cohort of 205 ICI-treated NSCLC patients, we used a multi-state modeling approach to understand the effect of developing CIP on the risk of death. We observed time-dependent changes in risk of developing and recovery from CIP, with an increased risk of both developing and recovering from CIP in the first year after initiating ICI. We found that developing CIP independently increased the risk of transitioning to death in both adjusted and unadjusted models. In the multivariate model, we found that the increase in mortality associated with CIP was only seen in patients with adenocarcinoma tumor histology. Collectively, these findings suggest that in NSCLC, development of CIP worsens survival in patients receiving immunotherapy., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite a wealth of preclinical and observational data, prospective data regarding the use of metformin in lung cancer is extremely limited., Methods: We pooled individualized data from two prospective trials evaluating metformin plus platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, in non-diabetic patients with untreated advanced NSCLC. In addition to reporting on clinical efficacy and safety endpoints, we also explored metformin's activity in key molecular cohorts., Results: 33 patients were included in the pooled analysis, of whom 70% were current or previous smokers. 82% had standard tissue molecular testing results available. KRAS, EGFR, and LKB1 mutation prevalence was 48%, 26%, and 8.3%, respectively. Composite median PFS was 6 months for all patients (95% CI: [1.36, 7.96]), 7.2 months for KRAS mutants (95% CI: [1.18, 9.21]), and 6.6 months for EGFR mutants (95% CI: [1.18, 15.29]). Composite median OS was 14.8 months for all patients (95% CI: [8.25, 19.99]), 17.5 months for KRAS mutants (95% CI: [8.86, 26.96]), and 13.3 months for EGFR mutants (95% CI: [2.60, 25.86]). Lymphopenia was the most common grade 3 AE (12%), followed by leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, and hypertension (9% each). There were 2 grade 4 AEs, neutropenia (21%) and sepsis (3%), and 1 grade 5 AE (colonic perforation) attributed to bevacizumab., Conclusion: Our results confirm the previously shown efficacy and tolerability of metformin in combination with chemotherapy and highlight encouraging activity in key molecular cohorts. Future efforts should build on this work by prospectively studying metformin in these molecular subgroups., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is an immune-related adverse event that can occur after initiation of anti-programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for the treatment of multiple malignancies, including NSCLC. However, the incidence of CIP has not been previously examined in a population that included both trial-enrolled and non-trial-enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, risk factors and other clinical characteristics associated with CIP severity are not known. In this study, we retrospectively examined clinical characteristics, incidence, and risk factors for CIP in a cohort of 205 patients with NSCLC, all of whom received anti-programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 ICIs. Our results demonstrate a higher incidence of CIP (19%) than previously reported in clinical trials (3%-5%). Our data also suggest that tumor histologic type may be a risk factor for CIP development. We observed a wide range of time to onset of CIP (median 82 days), with high morbidity and mortality associated with higher-grade CIP regardless of degree of immunosuppression. Our data provide new insight into the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of CIP. Further studies are needed to increase CIP pharmacovigilance, improve risk stratification, and refine diagnostic algorithms for the diagnosis and management of this potential life-threatening complication of ICI therapy., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the absence of a targeted oncogenic driver mutation or high programmed death-ligand 1 expression, systemic therapy with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab has been the standard treatment in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Metformin has been shown to have antitumor effects via a variety of insulin-dependent and insulin-independent mechanisms and to be potentially synergistic with chemotherapy., Materials and Methods: This open-label single-center phase II study (NCT01578551) enrolled patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC and randomized them (3:1) to receive carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab with (Arm A) or without (Arm B) concurrent metformin for four to six cycles followed by maintenance therapy with bevacizumab ± metformin continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or study withdrawal. The primary outcome was 1-year progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival, response to therapy, and toxicity., Results: A total of 25 patients were enrolled from August 2012 to April 2015, of whom 24 received at least one cycle of therapy administration. The study was stopped early due to slow accrual and changes in standard first-line therapy of advanced NSCLC. The 1-year PFS on Arm A ( n  = 18) was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25%-88%), which exceeded the historical control 1-year PFS of 15%. Median overall survival of patients treated on Arm A was 15.9 months (95% CI: 8.4-not available [NA]) and 13.9 months (95% CI: 12.7-NA) on Arm B. There were no significant differences in toxicity between the study arms., Conclusion: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to show a significant benefit in PFS with the use of metformin in this patient population and is a signal of efficacy for metformin in advanced NSCLC., Implications for Practice: The anticancer effects of metformin continue to be elucidated. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first trial in nondiabetic advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients to show a significant change in outcome with the addition of metformin to standard first-line chemotherapy. Well tolerated and widely available, metformin is a drug that should be considered for further study in the lung cancer treatment landscape., Competing Interests: Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article., (© AlphaMed Press 2018.)

The NCCN Guidelines for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) address all aspects of management for NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the targeted therapy and immunotherapy sections in the NCCN Guidelines. For the 2018 update, a new section on biomarkers was added., (Copyright © 2018 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.)

Brain metastases are common in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of associated poor prognosis and limited specific treatment options, there is a real need for the development of medical therapies and strategies for affected patients. Novel compounds for epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-dependent lung cancer have demonstrated blood-brain barrier permeability and have led to important improvements in central nervous system outcomes. Studies of targeted therapies for oncogene-driven tumors and of immunotherapies in patients with brain metastases have shown promise and, allied with novel radiation techniques, are driving a rapid evolution in treatment and prognosis for NSCLC brain metastases.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States and worldwide. Early detection of lung cancer is an important opportunity for decreasing mortality. Data support using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest to screen select patients who are at high risk for lung cancer. Lung screening is covered under the Affordable Care Act for individuals with high-risk factors. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) covers annual screening LDCT for appropriate Medicare beneficiaries at high risk for lung cancer if they also receive counseling and participate in shared decision-making before screening. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Lung Cancer Screening provides recommendations for initial and subsequent LDCT screening and provides more detail about LDCT screening. This manuscript focuses on identifying patients at high risk for lung cancer who are candidates for LDCT of the chest and on evaluating initial screening findings., (Copyright © 2018 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.)

Background: Successful implementation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evidence-based guideline recommendations requires effective educational programs that target all clinicians from interdisciplinary teams. This study describes and evaluates the Engaging an Interdisciplinary Team for NSCLC (GAIN 3.0) experiential learning-based educational curriculum., Methods: GAIN 3.0 was designed to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration for effective NSCLC diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. The program used a flipped classroom model that included an e-learning component prior to a live 6-hour interactive program. The interactive program included hands-on simulations, small group workshops, gamification, and case discussions. Participants included academic and community members of multidisciplinary lung cancer teams. Assessments included an online baseline survey, a pretest and posttest, a program evaluation, a long-term survey (LTS), and on-site faculty evaluation of participants., Results: Of 416 attendees to 13 live GAIN 3.0 programs (nine in the United States and four in Europe), 304 (73%) completed the pretest and 187 (45%) completed the posttest. Out of a perfect score of 12 points, program participants had a mean test score of 6.3 ± 2.1 on the pretest (52%) and 7.8 ± 2.1 on the posttest (65%) (P = .03). There was an overall knowledge increase of 13% from pretest to posttest. Most LTS respondents (65%) rated the GAIN 3.0 live programs as "high impact." On the LTS, the areas with the greatest gains in participants who had very high confidence were communication across disciplines, use of a team-based approach, and personalized treatment., Conclusions: GAIN 3.0 was a highly successful interdisciplinary activity that improved participants' knowledge, competence, and likely the clinical care provided to patients with NSCLC., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose To test whether computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) approaches can increase the positive predictive value (PPV) and reduce the false-positive rate in lung cancer screening for small nodules compared with human reading by thoracic radiologists. Materials and Methods A matched case-control sample of low-dose computed tomography (CT) studies in 186 participants with 4-20-mm noncalcified lung nodules who underwent biopsy in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was selected. Variables used for matching were age, sex, smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status, body mass index, study year of the positive screening test, and screening results. Studies before lung biopsy were randomly split into a training set (70 cancers plus 70 benign controls) and a validation set (20 cancers plus 26 benign controls). Image features from within and outside dominant nodules were extracted. A CAD algorithm developed from the training set and a random forest classifier were applied to the validation set to predict biopsy outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the prediction accuracy of CAD with the NLST investigator's diagnosis and readings from three experienced and board-certified thoracic radiologists who used contemporary clinical practice guidelines. Results In the validation cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for CAD was 0.9154. By default, the sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of the NLST investigators were 1.00, 0.00, and 0.43, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value of CAD and the three radiologists' combined reading were 0.95, 0.88, 0.86, and 0.96 and 0.70, 0.69, 0.64, and 0.75, respectively. Conclusion CAD could increase PPV and reduce the false-positive rate in the early diagnosis of lung cancer. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which harnesses the body's immune system to recognize and kill cancer cells, has transformed the management landscape for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Building on the success of this approach, clinical and translational researchers are attempting to augment the benefit of anti-programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 monotherapy through the addition of other therapies, such as conventional cancer treatments. This article reviews the potential use of immunotherapeutic strategies combined with radiation therapy in patients with NSCLC, focusing on ICB. It describes the mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors, summarizes published studies that demonstrate the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced NSCLC, and provides the preclinical and clinical rationale supporting the potential immunologic synergy of radiation and ICB.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Antiemesis address all aspects of management for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Antiemesis, specifically those regarding carboplatin, granisetron, and olanzapine., (Copyright © 2017 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.)

This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) focuses on targeted therapies and immunotherapies for metastatic NSCLC, because therapeutic recommendations are rapidly changing for metastatic disease. For example, new recommendations were added for atezolizumab, ceritinib, osimertinib, and pembrolizumab for the 2017 updates., (Copyright © 2017 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.)