Search

The present taxonomic study was carried out with material collected in the Michoacán state, Mexico, during one year of sampling. Ten new records of oribatid mites are reported for Mexico. Also, a new species, Gustavia mexicana sp. nov., is described, which differs from Gustavia fusifer (Koch, 1841), G. transylvanica Mahunka, 2006, G. latolamellata Hammer, 1977 and G. magnifica Golosova et Karppinen, 1984 by the absence of setal alveolus c, shape of sensillum, size and shape of rostrum, shape of lamella and presence of sejugal suture, respectively. A detailed description, schemes and photographs of the new species and an identification key for the species of the genus are provided.

Gustavia mexicana sp. nov. (Figs 1–18) Diagnosis. Tegument smooth, covered by a thin layer of cerotegument with many minute granules, more evident on subcapitulum; sejugal suture present; translamella absent; rostrum elongate, with rounded tip and very evident dorsally; prodorsal setae (in>le>ro) setiform and covered with small spines; sensillum with fusiform head, covered with small spines at tip; notogaster with six pairs of alveoli and three pairs of posteromarginal setae (alveolus c absent). Ventral plate typical of the family. Legs heterotridactylous. Description of the adult. Measurements. Body length: 575 (holotype ♂), 562 (allotype: ♀), 560 (526–603) 18 paratypes; width: 424 (holotype ♂), 420 (allotype: ♀), 498 (437–531) 18 paratypes. Integument (Figs 1–5, 15–18). Body color yellowish brown to dark brown, body surface smooth. Thin layer of densely micro granulated cerotegument covering body (ctg) (Fig 4), more evident on subcapitulum, granules slightly uniform (0.8–1.3). Lamellae slightly striate, lamellar cusps smooth. Legs I–IV without cerotegument or tubercles. Prodorsum (Figs 1, 4, 7). Rostrum with rounded, elongated tip, completely visible in dorsal position. Prolamellae (plam) with minute plate circumscribing alveolus of rostral seta, originating from base of lamellar cusps; rostral setae (ro: 68–84) setiform, densely covered with small spines, which are only visible under a 100x objective. Lamellae (lam) slightly convergent, slightly larger than half the length of prodorsum. Lamellar cusps triangular, divergent, with distinguishable elongation extending below lamellar seta; lamellar seta (le: 70–100) setiform, proximal quarters mooth, remaining parts with small spines and less abundant than on seta ro. Translamella absent. Interlamellar seta (in: 125–136) setiform, longer than other prodorsal setae; completely covered with spines. These pines, which are near the tip are much larger and distinguishable than those near base. Sensillum (ss: length: 113–136, head width: 7–10) elongate, fusiform, generally smaller than seta in, head distinguishable, ending in short tip, stalk and head covered with spines, larger and sparser on head. Exobotridial seta (ex: 2) small, smooth, inconspicuous. Tutorium (tu) knife-shaped, a quarter longer than lamellae. Notogaster (Figs 1, 34, 6). Dorsosejugal suture present. Nine pairs of notogastral setae present, six dorsal pairs represented only by alveoli ( la, lm, lp, h 3, h 2, h 1 ), alveolus c absent. Three pairs of posteromarginal setae, setae ( p 1 : 33.6–34.8) larger than p2 and p3, the latter of equal size (20.7–22) (Table 1). The lyrifissure ia was not observed, im arranged laterally on dorsum and ip longitudinally; ih and ips only visible ventrally. Opisthonotal gland (gla) lateromarginal near lp. Muscular insertions in mid-dorsal position, between alveoli la and lm. Internal structure similar to a sigilla divided into 4–6 parts, centered anteriorly, just anterior to dorsosejugal suture. Gnathosoma (Figs 5, 8–9, 14). Morphology typical of Gustaviidae (Ermilov et al. 2013; Norton & Behan-Pelletier 2009; Woolley 1979). Subcapitulum longer than wide (146–151.3 x 78–78.6). Subcapitular setae a (47.4–52.6), h (62.7–64.5) and m (30.2–32) setiforme, with spines. Palps (length 110–131) with setae, from coxa to tarsus: 0-2-1- 3-8 (+ ω). Eupathidium acm palpal and solenidium start from the same base. Chelicera very long (208–241 x 4.8–5) fixed digit absent, movable digit styliform, distal part with four very evident large teeth, occasionally the first tooth becomes broken, posterior portion of chelicera (1/3 of total length) with a row of teeth considerably smaller than the first and another parallel row of very fine and evident cilia, on the remaining proximal 2/3 smooth. Epimeral and lateral podosomal region (Figs 1–3, 5, 7). Pedotectum I straight, long, almost the same length as tutorium, pedotectum II crescent-shaped. Discidium (dis) triangular, well developed. Carina circumpedal (cp) complete, not touching margin of ventral plate. Epimeric borders (bordures epimeriques sensu Grandjean) well developed and evident, posterior median edge of epimere IV with elongate chitinous structure projecting posteriorly; epimere I–III not connected, IV ends near the genital opening. Epimeral setae long, setiform, densely covered with spines, length variable: 1a, 2a, 3a (30.2–32.6), 1b (49–51.3), 1c, 3c, 4a, 4b, 4c (36–43.8), 3b (60–60.7). Anogenital region (Figs. 2, 5–7). Six pairs of genital setae (g1–g6: 24.8–29), one pair of aggenital setae (ag: 23–27.3), two pairs of anal setae (an: 1–3: 22.8–24.6), three pairs of adanal setae: ad3 (21.9–23) in preanal position, ad2 (24.2–25.3) paraanal and ad1 (22.2–25.2) postanal; all setae setiform and smooth. Lyrifissure iad (8.7–9) in preanal position, transverse and very conspicuous. Legs (Figs 1–3, 15–18). All legs heterotridactylous, median claw slightly larger than lateral ones, more evident on legs I–II. Trochanters III–IV considerably large. Femurs I–II longer than III and IV (Table 2). Trochanters and femora with ventral ridges, ends of ridges rounded on leg IV and ending in point on leg III; porose areas in anterodorsal position on femurs and trochanters III–IV. Setal and solenidia formulae: I: 1-5-3(1)-4(2)-20(2), II: 1- 4-3(1)-4(1)-16(2); III: 2-3-2(1)-3(1)-15; IV: 1-2-3-3(1)-12. Setae mostly setiform, with small spines, on legs I–II evident only under 100 x objective, on hind legs spines are larger and more evident. Famulus (e) setiform, straight and with rounded tip. Solenidia setiform, with rounded tip; solenidium ω1 larger than ω2 on tarsus I, similar size on tarsus II (Table 3). Greek letters refer to solenidia (except e = famulus), Roman letters to normal setae. Single prime (’) marks setae on the anterior and double prime (”) setae on the posterior side of a given leg segment. Material studied. Holotype, allotype and 18 paratypes: Mexico, State of Michoacán, Municipality of Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro, (19°23’27.8 “N 102°10’30.8 “W), 2160 m.a.s.l. and La Joya, Veracruz State (19°36’49.3”N 97°01’59.2”W) at 2210 m.a.s.l. Leaf litter and intervened primary forest floor, consisting of Pinus michoacana Martinez, Quercus rugosa Nee (1801), scattered undergrowth and leaf litter and soil of Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. forest. 1 female (17.01.2020), 1 male (15.02.2020), 1 male (13.03.2020), 1 female (10.04.2020), 1 male (15.05.2020), 1 male (13.07.2020), 2 males, 1 female (11.09.2020), 3 males, 2 females (8.10.2020), 2 males (10.01.2021), 2 males and 2 females (16.01.2022). Collected by: Edith Estrada, Armando Equihua and Harol Revelo. Type deposition. The holotype (EGEV C-0001), allotype (EGEV C-0002) (preserved in 70% alcohol and glycerin), and 12 paratypes (EGEV C-0003-0014), in permanent preparations of hoyer liquid, were deposited in the collection of Dr. Edith Guadalupe Estrada Venegas, Texcoco, State of Mexico, Mexico. Six paratypes (three preserved in 70% alcohol and glycerin and three in permanent preparations of hoyer liquid) were deposited in the collection of CNAC-Mexico. Etymology. The name “ mexicana ” is given because it is the first species of the genus Gustavia, described with specimens collected in Mexico. Remarks. The species is similar to Gustavia fusifer (Koch, 1841) (= Neozetes bicornis Berlese, 1885), based the absence of the setal alveolus c and shape of the sensillum. With G. transylvanica Mahunka, 2006, it shares the rounded and elongated shape of the rostrum, shape of the lamellae and sensillum. With G. latolamellata Hammer, 1977 and G. magnifica Golosova & Karppinen, 1984, presence of sejugal suture. However, it differs from G. fusifer and G. transylvanica by the absence of translamella and presence of sejugal suture (versus presence of translamella and absence of sejugal suture). From G. latolamellata it differs by the absence of translamella, elongated and rounded shape of the rostrum (versus broad translamella present and rostrum ending in a point, slightly protruding in front of the translamella). Gustavia mexicana shows a pattern in its habitat preferences and distribution, it has been collected in pine forest litter, moist soils, between 2160 and 2210 meters above sea level. The two sites where samples were collected are adjacent to Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt., Published as part of Revelo-Tobar, Harol, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G. & Martinez, Armando Equihua, 2022, New records of oribatid mites from Mexico with description of a new species, pp. 24-38 in Zootaxa 5168 (1) on pages 28-35, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5168.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/6885643, {"references":["Ermilov, S. G., Rybalov, L. B. & Wu, D. (2013) Morphology of nymphal instars of Gustavia longiseta (Acari: Oribatida: Gustaviidae). Acarina, 21 (1), 53 - 61.","Norton, R. A. & Behan-Pelletier, V. (2009) Suborder Oribatida. In: Krantz, G. W. & Walter, D. E. (Eds.), A manual of acarology. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, pp. 430 - 564.","Woolley, T. A. (1979) The chelicerae of the Gustaviidae. In: Rodriguez, J. (Ed.), Recent advances in acarology. Vol. II. Academic Press, New York, pp. 547 - 551."]}

Keys for species of the genus Gustavia (Updated from Pérez-Íñigo 1987, 1997) Gustavia magnilamellata (Ewing, 1909) (= Serrarius connexus Berlesle, 1916), Gustavia parvula (Banks, 1909) and Gustavia rugosa Balogh, 1958 were not included in this key because their descriptions do not provide sufficient information on their morphology. 1 Sejugal suture present.................................................................................. 2 - Sejugal suture absent.................................................................................. 4 2 Translamella absent............................................ Gustavia mexicana sp. nov. Distribution: Mexico. - Translamella present................................................................................... 3 3 Setae barbulate; in smooth; translamella with deep depression; fusiform sensillum, thin head covered with short spines...................................... Gustavia magnifica Golosova & Karppinen, 1984. Distribution: East Asian Russia. - le setae smooth; in slightly barbed; depression of translamella slightly deep; sensillum fusiform, head widened and smooth.................................................... Gustavia latolamellata Hammer, 1977. Distribution: Pakistan. 4 Translamella absent................................................................................... 5 - Vestigial, incomplete or absent translamellae.............................................................. 10 5 Rostrum with pointed or rounded end..................................................................... 6 - Rostrum not pointed or rounded, concave in center........................................................... 7 6 Setas in slightly barbed, lamellae considerably broad; rostrum slightly elongated and broad; apophyses adjacent to rostrum broad and evident................................... Gustavia transylvanica Mahunka, 2006. Distribution: Romania. - Setae in smooth setae; lamellae narrowly flared; rostrum elongated, ending in a point and with narrow, inconspicuous apophyses............................ Gustavia maior (Berlese, 1903) (= Gustavia microcephala longirostris Mihelčič, 1957). See description and diagrams in: (Pérez-Íñigo 1997). Distribution: Mediterranean. 7 Short rostrum, barely projecting beyond the lamellar cusps ……………………………………………………….……… Gustavia microcephala (Nicolet, 1855) (= Gustavia sol Kramer, 1879). See description and diagrams in: (Pérez-Íñigo 1997). Distribution: Palearctic (frequent), Eastern and Mexico? - Rostrum elongate, projecting beyond lamellar cusps.......................................................... 8 8 Rostrum and translamella with deep depression............. Gustavia aethiopica Mahunka, 1982. Distribution: Ethiopic. - Rostrum and translamella straight........................................................................ 9 9 Long lamellar cusps; sensillum with short spines covered head..................... Gustavia longicornis (Berlese, 1903). See description and diagrams in: (Pérez-Íñigo 1997). Distribution: Mediterranean and Oriental. - Short lamellar cusps; sensillum with elongated head equal to half its length, with a few setae at the end........................................ Gustavia fusifer (Koch, 1841) (= Neozetes bicornis Berlese, 1885; = Oribata globula Koch, 1841). See description and diagrams in: (Pérez-Íñigo 1997). Distribution: Western Palearctic. 10 Long modified gnathosoma, almost as long as rostral Setae................................................... 11 - Short modified gnathosoma, hidden under the rostral tectum.................................................. 12 11 Lamellar cusps shorter than lamellae width; sensillum head covered distally with small spines; setae p1, p2 and p3 present...................................................... Gustavia ornata Mahunka, 2011. Distribution: Madagascar. - Lamellar cusps longer than the width of the lamellae; sensillum head covered distally with 2–3 short spines and very long setiform termination; setae p1 long, p2 and p3 represented only by alveoli............................................................................................ Gustavia sineornata Mahunka, 2011. Distribution: Madagascar. 12 Translamella absent; lanceolate sensillum..................... Gustavia aominensis Fujikawa, 2008. Distribution: Japan - Incomplete translamella; fusiform sensillum.............................................................. 13 13 Setae in long, almost reaching the anterior end of the setae le; sensillum lanceolate, with very small spines on the head; p1 setae very long, setae p2 and p3 setae absent, represented by alveoli............................................................ Gustavia longiseta Mahunka, 1984. See description and diagrams in: (Ermilov et al. 2013). Distribution: Ethiopic - Setas in short, barely reaching the insertion points of the setae le; sensillum fusiform; setae p1, p2 and p3 present, setiform and short.................................................................................................. Gustavia oceanica Pérez-Íñigo, 1987. Distribution: Southern Palearctic (western Mediterranean) and Eastern (India: West Bengal, and Philippines), Published as part of Revelo-Tobar, Harol, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G. & Martinez, Armando Equihua, 2022, New records of oribatid mites from Mexico with description of a new species, pp. 24-38 in Zootaxa 5168 (1) on pages 35-36, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5168.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/6885643, {"references":["Perez-Inigo, C. (1987) Oribatidos de las islas Azores (1) (Acari, Oribatei). Revista EspanTola de Entomologiia, 63, 197 - 228.","Perez-Inigo, C. (1997) Acari Oribatei, Gymnonota I. In: Ramos, M. A., Tercedor, J. A., Ros, X. B., Noguera, J. G., Sierra, A. G., Macpherson Mayol, E., Piera, F. M., Marino, J. S., Gonzales, J. T. (Eds.), Fauna Iberica. Museo Nacional de Ciancias Naturales. Madrid, 374 pp.","Ermilov, S. G., Rybalov, L. B. & Wu, D. (2013) Morphology of nymphal instars of Gustavia longiseta (Acari: Oribatida: Gustaviidae). Acarina, 21 (1), 53 - 61."]}

Key to Amphibolips ��� nassa��� -group of species 1. Metatarsal claw simple. Antenna entirely light brown. Mesopleuron weakly sculptured, speculum glabrous, smooth (Fig. 3E). Mesoscutellum without posteromedian depression (Figs 2C & 2F).............................................. 2 - Metatarsal claw with large basal lobe. Antenna completely black or bicolored always darker in basal half (black to dark brown in basal half and brown to ambarine distally). Mesopleuron coarsely sculptured, speculum sculptured and sometimes pubescent. Mesoscutellum with distinct posteromedian depression (Figs 2 G���H, 4B���D & 5D���E)................................ 3 2. Mesoscutum uniformly rugose. Notaulus traceable only in posterior third, furrows deep, broad, smooth (Fig. 2C). Median propodeal area smooth, glabrous. Metasomal terga smooth, without micropunctures. Forewing almost hyaline, without darkened areas. Males and females...................................................................... A. salicifoliae - Mesoscutum not uniformly rugose, anterior half with transversal interrupted faint carinae, rugate in posterior half (Fig. 2F). Notaulus complete, shallow, hardly traceable under sculpture, notaular furrow faintly carinate (Fig. 2F). Median propodeal area faintly rugose. Metasomal tergum II with fine micropunctures in posterior 1/3, sometimes not visible in dorsal view, and rarely completely absent in the sexual generation; subsequent terga micropunctured. Forewing hyaline, with only heavily infuscate patch in the basal area of radial cell (similar to Fig. 1B). Sexual and asexual generations............ A. quercuspomiformis 3. Forewing hyaline, only with a heavily infuscate patch in basal area of radial cell (Fig. 1B). Internal lateral margin of notaulus delimited by a carina in posterior half of mesoscutum (Figs 2 D���E).............................................. 4 - Forewing differently colored, infuscation covers larger area than basal area of radial cell (Figs 1A, 1 C���G & 2A���B). Notaulus, if present, with lateral margins not delimited by carinae (Fig. 2G)............................................... 5 4. Metasoma reddish-brown; posterior 1/3 of T2 with band of hardly traceable micropunctures. Frons coarsely reticulate-rugose. Notaulus complete, broad. Mesoscutellar posteromedian depression shallow, only slightly depressed (Fig. 2D). Speculum finely rugose, glabrous. Males and females............................................................. A. aliciae - Metasoma ambarine; posterior 1/3 of T2 with band of distinct micropunctures. Frons alutaceous, with fine rugae. Notaulus incomplete, visible under rugose sculpture in posterior half. Mesoscutellar posteromedian depression conspicuously deep (Fig. 2E). Speculum uniformly sparsely pubescent, with transversal carinae. Only females............................................................................ A. comini nom. nov. (= A. kinseyi Cuesta-Porta & Pujade-Villar, 2020) 5. Forewing infuscate at least in distal half with transverse hyaline band in apical 1/3 of radial cell, extended or not towards inferior margin of wing (Figs 1A & 1 F���G); some males with reduced transverse hyaline band (Fig. 6C).................... 6 - Female forewing generally slightly infuscate with conspicuous heavily infuscate band on anterior margin, never with transverse hyaline band (Figs 1D, 1E & 2A); male forewing completely infuscate with distinct darker band on anterior margin (Fig. 1C). Sometimes forewing of male and female with hyaline area in distal third of radial cell (Fig. 1C)...................... 16 6. Body black, rarely metasoma dorsally black, ventrally rufous. Basal cell completely infuscate; transversal hyaline band incomplete (Fig. 1F), not reaching posterior margin (except complete band in A. castroviejoi, but in this case mesoscutellar foveae smooth), if almost reaching posterior margin, hyaline band strongly narrowed posteriorly (Fig. 1G).................... 7 - Head and mesosoma black, metasoma rufous or ambarine. Basal cell hyaline (Fig. 1A); forewing with complete transversal hyaline band with subparallel margins, reaching posterior margin in female (Fig. 1A), scutellar foveae rugate or transversally carinate; the only species with male (A. bassae), with forewing completely infuscate, with small round hyaline area in median part of first costal cell near margin with radial cell.......................................................... 13 7. Mesoscutellar posterior depression deep, posteromedian depression V-shaped in dorsal view (Figs 4 B���D & 4F), with lateral sharp horn-like projections, sometimes projections bent upwards apically (Fig. 4E). Propodeal carinae distinct (Fig. 3F)... 8 - Mesoscutellar posteromedian depression present, not V-shaped in dorsal view (Figs 3 A���B & 5E); lateral sides of mesoscutellum barely projected posteriorly. Propodeal carinae indistinct................................................. 12 8. Forewing with broad transversal hyaline band, covering 3/4 of radial cell (Fig. 1G). Mesoscutellar posteromedian depression without deeper median groove; mesoscutellar foveae divided by strong carina in females, not divided in males A. magnigalla - Forewing with narrower transversal hyaline band, covering distal 1/3 or less of radial cell (Fig. 1F). Mesoscutellar posteromedian depression with median groove deeper than posterior depression, sometimes extending anteriorly, dividing mesoscutellar foveae (Figs 4C & 4F)................................................................................. 9 9. Mesoscutellum at least 1.2x as long as broad. 2r vein curved or slightly angled, not projected into radial cell (Fig. 6A).... 10 - Mesoscutellum as long as broad. 2r vein angled, conspicuously projected into radial cell (Figs 6 B���C)................. 11 10. Posterolateral projections of mesoscutellum flat and rounded apically (Fig. 4C). Mesoscutellar median groove projected anteriorly, dividing mesoscutellar foveae. Notaulus conspicuous and almost complete (Fig. 4C). Forewing with transversal hyaline band wide covering central 1/3 of 3 rd cubital cell in females, males with narrow transversal band, less than 1/5 of 3 rd cubital cell���s length; base of 3 rd cubital cell uniformly infuscate in males and females............................. A. kinseyi - Posterolateral projections of mesoscutellum acute and pointing upwards apically. Mesoscutellar median groove not projected into mesoscutellar foveae (Fig. 4D). Notaulus inconspicuous under coarse rugae, if visible, then only in posterior half of mesoscutum (Fig. 4D). Forewing with transversal hyaline band narrow, covering less than 1/5 of 3 rd cubital cell���s length in females; base of 3 rd cubital cell with less infuscate area, completely separated from transversal hyaline band by deeply infuscate strip.......................................................................................... A. nigrialatus 11. Mesoscutellar median groove extended anteriorly, dividing mesoscutellar foveae (Fig. 4F). Area aside of parapsidal lines rugose. Only females.............................................................................. A. turulli - Mesoscutellar median groove not extended anteriorly into mesoscutellar foveae, mesoscutellar foveae divided by irregular carina (Fig. 4B). Area aside of parapsidal lines coriaceous, without rugae. Males and females.................. A. dampfi 12. Mesoscutellum and mesoscutellar foveae uniformly rugose, foveae not divided (Fig. 2H). Posterodorsal area of mesopleuron coarsely rugate. Forewing with costal, discoidal, and anal cells hyaline. Metasoma black. Only females...... A. durangensis - Mesoscutellar foveae smooth and divided by strong carina (Fig. 2G). Posterodorsal area of mesopleuron smooth or faintly rugate. Forewing completely infuscate, except from transversal hyaline band (Fig. 2B). Metasoma dorsally black, ventrally rufo-piceous. Males and females.............................................................. A. castroviejoi 13. Mesoscutellar posteromedian depression absent or shallow, never reaching posteroventral margin of mesoscutellum (Fig. 3A). Only females................................................................................... A. fusus - Mesoscutellar posteromedian depression distinct, reaching posteroventral margin of mesoscutellum (Fig. 3B)........... 14 14. Notauli complete, traceable under sculpture, reaching anterior margin; median mesoscutal line absent. Mesoscutellum 1.1x as long as broad; median carina between mesoscutellar foveae faint. Posterolateral projections of mesoscutellum extending downwards, forming carina delimiting mesoscutellar emargination in posterior view (Fig. 5H). Only females..... A. bromus - Notauli incomplete, lost under sculpture in anterior half, median mesoscutal line distinct in females (Fig. 3B); in males notaulus and median line almost inconspicuous, under coarse rugulose sculpture. Mesoscutellum in females 0.8���0.9x as long as broad, median carina between mesoscutellar foveae strong (Fig. 5E); in males, mesoscutellum 1.1x as long as broad, median carina between mesoscutellar foveae strong, partially under rugae of foveae. Posterior projections of mesoscutellum pointed (Fig. 5E), not extending downwards in both sexes................................................................... 15 15. Mesoscutellar posterolateral projections pointed, elongated upwards (Fig. 5E). Clypeus and mandibles uniformly chestnut brown. Females with F11 clearly divided by incomplete sulcus; F11 behind sulcus 2.0x as long as broad. Metasoma ambarine. Males and females............................................................................. A. bassae - Mesoscutellar posterolateral projections rounded, not pointed upwards (Fig. 3B). Clypeus chestnut brown, mandibles rufous. F11 not divided by faint incomplete sulcus; F11 as long as broad behind sulcus. Metasoma reddish-brown. Only females............................................................................................... A. cibriani 16. Forewing with costal, basal, first cubital cells and part of anal cell under basal cell uniformly infuscate (Fig. 2A). Only females....................................................................................... A. oaxacae - Costal and anal cells not infuscate or less infuscate than basal and radial cell (Fig. 1D). Known males always with completely infuscate forewing, sometimes hyaline in third cubital and discoidal cells (Fig. 1C)................................ 17 17. Proximal part of radial cell heavily infuscate; R1, Rs and 2r veins not traceable through infuscate band or hardly visible (Fig. 1E). Forewing completely infuscate. Only females.......................................................... 18 - Radial cell not heavily infuscate, sometimes infuscate band lightened at distal end of radial cell usually extending to anterior margin of 3rd cubital cell; R1, Rs and 2r visible in females (Fig. 1D); forewing faintly infuscate, more or less hyaline. Forewing of males completely and heavily infuscate with inconspicuous veins at base of radial cell........................... 19 18. Mesoscutellar foveae emarginate medially by conspicuous carina with transversal carinae emerging laterally (similar to Fig. 3C). Metasomal tergum II shining, smooth in front of micropuncture band............................ A. zacatecaensis - Mesoscutellar foveae smooth, not separated medially or with faint incomplete median carina on anterior margin, transversal carinae absent or faint (Fig. 5D). Metasomal tergum II posteriorly coriaceous previous to micropunctured band, not reaching half-length of tergum............................................................................ A. nassa 19. Mesoscutellar foveae smooth, divided medially by strong carina. Mesoscutellar posterior depression not reaching basis of mesoscutellum, interrupted by strong transverse carina on posterior end (Figs 5F & 5G). Radial cell in males less than 3.5x as long as broad. Males and females............................................................ A. michoacaensis - Scutellar foveae with transverse carinae extending laterally from median carina (Fig. 4A). Scutellar depression reaching posterior margin of mesoscutellum, not interrupted by strong transverse carina. Radial cell in males longer................. 20 20. Lateral margin of eye shining, smooth (Fig. 5A)............................................................ 21 - Lateral margin of eye with fine sculpture (Figs 5 B���C)....................................................... 23 21. Metasomal tergum II punctured on posterior 1/5 on dorsal part and 1/3 laterally; with fine longitudinal striations on anterior part behind punctuation (Fig. 5J). In females F1 1.4x as long as F2. Males and females........................ A. jaliscensis - Metasomal tergum II with uniformly punctured band on posterior 1/3. In females F1 1.6x as long as F2. In some species males known also......................................................................................... 22 22. Metasomal tergum II with small dorsal projection of punctures towards anterior margin, never reaching half-length of tergum (Fig. 3G); rest of terga mainly smooth with fine coriaceous sculpture limiting punctures. Only females............ A. rulli - Metasomal tergum II with band of punctures not projected on dorsal part; rest of terga coriaceous reaching anterior margin of metasoma (Fig. 5I). Males and females.......................................................... A. nevadensis 23. Mesoscutum rugose, posteromedial area less densely rugose, rugae forming larger cells compared to rest of mesoscutum, usually along median carina and notauli (Fig. 3D). Lateral and dorsal margin of eye with fine carinae irradiating from eye (Fig. 5B). Scutellar foveae subtriangular, limited posteriorly and medially by rugose sculpture, medial carina shorter than length of foveae; posterior depression variable in depth, but never reaching scutellar foveae, uniformly rugulose with alutaceous sculpture between rugae like rest of mesoscutellum (Fig. 3D). Metascutellum rectangular, more than 2.0x as broad as high. Males and females................................................................................... A. tarasco - Mesoscutum uniformly rugose, rugae forming similar cells along the mesoscutum, notauli and medial sulci inconspicuous (Fig. 3C). Lateral margin of eyes rugose-coriaceous, not emarginate (Figs 5C). Scutellar foveae quadrangular, limited posteriorly by transverse carinae never by rugose sculpture, median carina as long as length of foveae; posterior depression reaching scutellar foveae, with transverse carinae, smooth interspaces (Fig. 3C). Metascutellum quadrate, less than 1.8x as broad as high. Only females................................................................................. A. hidalgoensis, Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, V��ctor, Equihua-Mart��nez, George Melika Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibri��n-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ru��z, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, S��nchez, Imelda Virginia L��pez & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2021, A new name for Amphibolips kinseyi Cuesta-Porta & Pujade-Villar and a revised key to the Amphibolips ' nassa' species-complex from Mexico and Central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 331-345 in Zootaxa 4938 (3) on pages 335-337, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4938.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/4569695, {"references":["Cuesta-Porta, V., Equihua-Martinez, A., Estrada-Venegas, E., Cibrian-Tovar, D., Barrera-Ruiz, U. M., Ordaz Silva, S., Lopez Sanchez, I. V., Melika, G. & Pujade-Villar, J. (2020) Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa ' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Zootaxa, 4877, (1), 1 - 50. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4877.1.1"]}

Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, George Melika Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Pujade-Villar, Juli (2021): A new name for Amphibolips kinseyi Cuesta-Porta & Pujade-Villar and a revised key to the Amphibolips 'nassa' species-complex from Mexico and Central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Zootaxa 4938 (3): 331-345, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4938.3.4

Amphibolips oaxacae Nieves-Aldrey & Pascual Amphibolips oaxacae Nieves-Aldrey & Pascual, 2012. In Nieves-Aldrey et al.2012: 14–16. Material examined. HOLOTYPE. ♀ deposited in MNCN (Cat. nº 2249; Code: 89204). MEXICO, Oaxaca, S. Pe-dro Tapanatepec, 16º 22’ 34.40” N, 94º 04’ 43 11” W, 1300 masl; Ex gall Quercus sp. aff. sapotifolia, (29.iii.2006) iii.2006, leg. E. Pascual. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by completely infuscate forewing, with anterior infuscate band, including costal and proximal half of anal cells, radial cell uniformly infuscate (Fig. 13F); scutellar posterior depression deep, almost as broad as scutellar foveae (Fig. 11I). Besides the distinctive forewing pattern, adults closely resemble A. tarasco by less densely rugate mesoscutum in posteromedian margin. These species can be differentiated by their mesoscutellum: scutellar foveae ovate, median carina complete in A. oaxacae (foveae triangular with median carina reduced to anterior half of foveae and the rest is rugate in A. tarasco), posteromedian depression almost as broad as total width of foveae (around half of total width of foveae in A. tarasco) (Figs 11 I–J). The globular gall resembles others but galls of A. oaxacae and A. tarasco are hard, around 40 mm in diameter, not deformable at finger pressure, with mottled surface. Both species cannot be differentiated by galls shape, only by the host plant: A. oaxacae galls on Quercus sp. aff. s apotifolia, A. tarasco galls on Q. castanea. Gall. A subglobose large bud gall, maximum 40 mm in diameter, outer shell thin, resistant, slightly lignified. Pale green with darker green spots when fresh and turning brown when dry. The gall is monolocular, with a spongy internal tissue, filling in the entire gall; the larval cell is rounded (Nieves-Aldrey et al. 2012: Fig. 18F). Host. Quercus sp. aff. sapotifolia (according to original description). Biology. Only females are known. The galls were collected in March; adults emerged in the same month. Distribution. Mexico: Oaxaca State. Remarks. Most closely resembles A. tarasco. Only one specimen of A. oaxacae is known and until more material is found it is impossible to sort out the intraspecific variability in this species. However, the actual differences that determine A. oaxacae are robust enough to consider it as a valid species., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on page 23, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Nieves-Aldrey, J. L., Pascual, E., Maldonado-Lopez, Y., Medianero, E. & Oyama, K. (2012) Revision of the Amphibolips species of Mexico excluding the \" niger complex \" Kinsey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), with description of seven new species. Zootaxa, 3545 (1), 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3545.1.1"]}

Amphibolips nevadensis Nieves-Aldrey & Pascual Amphibolips nevadensis Nieves-Aldrey & Pascual, 2012. In Nieves-Aldrey et al., 2012: 19–22. Material examined. HOLOTYPE. ♀ deposited in MNCN (Cat. nº 2252; Code: 89217). MEXICO, Jalisco, Nevado Colima, Ciudad Guzmán, 2300 m; Ex Q. candicans, (20.viii.2009), leg. E. Pascual. Paratypes (deposited in MNCN): 2♂, “ Nevado Colima, 2370 m, Ex Q. candicans, (31.iii.2009) iv.2009, leg. E. Pascual ” (Codes: 89218–89219). Aditional material. Deposited in UB with the following labels: “S066; S068, MEXICO, Monte Escobedo, Montes Escobedo, Zacatecas, (21.vii.2011) only galls, Ex Q. calophylla ”; “S243, MEXICO, Propiedad la Victoria, Barrio la Tlazintla, Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, (07.vi.2010) only galls, Ex Quercus sp.”. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by faintly infuscate forewings, with anterior infuscate band in females (male forewing completely infuscate with darker anterior band); lateral margin of eye with a smooth band usually emarginate by a carina; metasoma tergum II before band of micropunctures almost completely coarsely coriaceous, with some fine irregular longitudinal striae. Closely resembles A. jaliscensis (see diagnosis to A. jaliscensis). Also closely resembles A. rulli n. sp. but differs in the sculpture of metasoma tergum II, which is coriaceous in front of the micropuncture band in A. nevadensis (smooth in front of micropunctures in A. rulli n. sp.). Galls are very similar to those of A. nassa and A. rulli n. sp.; these species cannot be differentiated by galls, only by the host plant; Amphibolips nevadensis on Q. calophylla, A. nassa on Q. castanea and A. rulli n. sp. on Q. eduardi and Q. viminea. All these galls are subglobose, very hard and fusiform at apex, ending in a defined tip. Gall. A subspherical bud gall, fusiform at apex, ending in a tip, maximum 40 mm in diameter, outer shell thin, resistant, slightly lignified. Olive green with pale green spots when fresh and turning dark green when dry. The gall is monolocular, with a spongy internal tissue, filling the entire gall. The larval cell is rounded. Pictures of the gall are provided in Nieves-Aldrey et al. (2012: Figs 19E–F) Host. According to the original description, Q. calophylla (= candicans). We found galls on the same host plant. Biology. Only females are known. The galls were collected in March; adults emerged in the same month. Distribution. Mexico: Jalisco State. Remarks. Nieves-Aldrey et al. (2012) confused the figure of the mesosoma (dorsal view) of the male of A. nevadensis with that of a female of A. oaxacae (Nieves-Aldrey et al. 2012: Fig. 7B). Herein we provide the mesosomal view of a type male of A. nevadensis (Fig.12E)., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 22-23, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Nieves-Aldrey, J. L., Pascual, E., Maldonado-Lopez, Y., Medianero, E. & Oyama, K. (2012) Revision of the Amphibolips species of Mexico excluding the \" niger complex \" Kinsey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), with description of seven new species. Zootaxa, 3545 (1), 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3545.1.1"]}

Amphibolips bromus Pujade-Villar & Cuesta-Porta n. sp. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 8256CC0E-6C41-48DE-8F9B-15F295ABD670 Type material. HOLOTYPE. ♀ (deposited in UB) with the following labels: “ MEXICO, Predio La Victoria, Acaxochitlan, Hidalgo ” (white label), “ Q. affinis, (03.v.2014) 16-31.v.2014, leg. U. Barrera-Ruiz ” (white label). “ Holotype Amphibolips bromus Pujade Villar & Cuesta-Porta n. sp., desig. Cuesta-Porta, 2020” (red label). Additional material. Galls collected in Sta. Fe (Mexico State) in June 2018 and June 2019 on Q. crassipes Etymology. The name refers to the genus Bromus (Poaceae), because the gall resembles some of the flowers of the species in this genus. Diagnosis. The new species is characterized by the forewing colouration: infuscate on the distal half with a hyaline cross band covering the whole width of the wing on distal third; mesoscutellum slightly longer than broad with posterolateral projections ending in a carina, posteriorly defining the margin of the depression on the mesoscutellum; scutellar fovea with a faint median carina; antennae chestnut brown, sometimes slightly lighter distally. Most closely resembles A. bassae n. sp. but can be differentiate by an inconspicuous median sulcus between scutellar foveae (visible through the sculpture in A. bassae n. sp.), mesoscutellum longer than broad (broader than long in females of A. bassae n. sp.), with margin of posterior depression defined laterally by carinae in posterior view (not marginate in A. cibriani and A. bassae n. sp.). Galls of A. bromus n. sp. differ from all earlier known Mexican Amphibolips species; they are strongly elongate with peduncle and apex very thin and long, internally almost without spongious tissue. Description. (Figs 3 A–3F). Female. Body length: 5 mm (N=1) Colour. Head black, except clypeus and mandibles brown; antennae black on basal half and chestnut to brown distally, mesosoma black, legs black, except tarsi brown, metasoma rufous brown. Head (Figs 3 A–3B) ovate in anterior view, upper face dull rugose, sparsely pubescent, 2.1x as broad as long from above, 1.1x as broad as high in anterior view and slightly narrower than mesosoma; lower face delicately rugose with alutaceous-coriaceous interspaces, uniformly pubescent, with white setae. Gena rugose with alutaceous interspaces, broadened behind eye, visible behind eyes in anterior view, as broad as cross diameter of eye; malar space faintly rugose and dull; height of eye 1.8x as long as length of malar space. POL subequal to OOL; diameter of lateral ocellus 2.0x as long as LOL; ocelli ovate. Transfacial distance 1.2x as broad as height of eye; diameter of antennal torulus 4.0x as long as distance between toruli, distance between torulus and inner margin of eye 1.3x as long as diameter of torulus. Clypeus alutaceous, ventrally with median incision; anterior tentorial pits deep, epistomal sulcus and clypeo-pleurostomal lines obscured, hardly traceable. Frons, vertex, interocellar area and occiput uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces. Occiput with dorsal faint carina. Labial palpus 3-segmented, maxillary palpus 5-segmented. Antenna (Fig. 3B) with 11 flagellomeres; slightly longer than head+mesosoma; scape 2.4x as long as pedicel; pedicel subglobose, slightly longer than broad; F1 subequal to scape+pedicel and 1.2x as long as F2; F2 1.2x as long as F3; F3 nearly equal in length to F4, subsequent flagellomeres shorter, F11 2.0x as long as F10, F11 partially divided; placodeal sensilla visible on F3–F11, absent on F1–F2. Mesosoma (Figs 3 C–3D) 1.2x as long as high. Pronotal plate dull smooth, rugate laterally; propleuron black. Mesoscutum rounded, uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces; 0.9x as long as broad in dorsal view (largest width measured across mesoscutum on the level of tegulae base). Notauli complete, mainly deep, shallower from half-length of mesoscutum, distinct through rugose sculpture, sulci with sculpture as rest of mesoscutum; anterior parallel lines visible through sculpture, elevate, extending to almost half of mesoscutum; parapsidal lines distinct, originating away from posterior margin and extending to nearly half length of mesoscutum, elevated, alutaceous; median mesoscutal sulcus absent; parascutal carina short, extending to level of tegula. Mesoscutellum 0.5–0.6x as long as mesoscutum, coarsely dull rugose, ovate, as broad as long, overhanging metanotum; not marginate laterally; scutellar foveae round, deep, with conspicuous median carina, foveae dull and delicately rugate, lateral sides of foveae with strong narrow carinae, separating them from dorsoaxillar area, posteriorly limited by coarsely rugate sculpture. Mesoscutellum with posteromedian depression connected to median part of foveae, reaching posterior margin of mesoscutellum, margined posteriorly by convergent strong carinae, depression dull rugose. Mesopleuron uniformly faintly rugose with alutaceous interspaces, sparsely pubescent, some rugae orientated into transverse subparallel striae. Mesopleural triangle rugose; dorsal axillar area rugate; lateral axillar area and axillula faintly rugate, with few short, white setae; subaxilular bar smooth, shining, with parallel sides on anterior part, its height less than height of metanotal trough, most posterior part extending to half height of mesoscutellum; postalar process long, with parallel striae; metapleural sulcus hidden undert dull rugose sculpture. Metascutellum uniformly faintly rugate-coriaceous, metanotal trough shining, rugate, with dense white setae; ventral impressed area smooth, slightly shorter than height of metascutellum; central propodeal area rugate, dull; lateral propodeal carinae visible, partially covered by sculpture, subparallel, extended posteriorly to lateral sides of nucha; lateral propodeal area with irregular strong wrinkles and dense white setae; nucha short, with irregular wrinkles around. Legs black, brown distally, with sparse short white setae; tarsal claws with basal lobe. Forewing (Fig. 3E) longer than body, with short dense cilia on margin; hyaline on basal half, with basal cell slightly infuscate around margins; distal half infuscate with clear longitudinal stripe on distal third extended posteriorly, reaching margin of wing, covering distal third of radial cell, medial part of second costal cell and distal part of discoidal cell; veins dark brown; radial cell narrow, heavily infuscate basally, long, opened on margin, 3.0x as long as broad; R1 nearly reaching wing margin; areolet highly reduced, almost absent, closed; Rs+M reaching basalis at its half height. Metasoma (Fig. 3F) as long as head+mesosoma, 1.4x as long as high in lateral view; 2 nd metasomal tergum reaching 2/3 of length of metasoma, smooth, shining, with short sparse setae laterally; posterior third conspicuously punctate dorsally and laterally, posterior margin with narrow smooth band, without punctures; all subsequent terga dorsally and laterally uniformly and entirely micropunctate, with narrow smooth band posteriorly on each tergum. Ventral spine of hypopygium robust, short, needle-like, prominent part 3.2x as long as broad, with two rows of white setae each side, extending beyond apex of spine. Gall (Fig. 14H). A very thin and elongate bud gall, about 50 mm long, with greatest width near the middle, up to 4 mm wide; elongate and thin petioles widening near median part, pointy apex gradually tapering from middle part. The gall is thin-walled, with a smooth and naked surface; thin spongious layer internally surrounding the central ovate larval chamber, with mature galls having a length of 5.0– 6.5 mm. Hosts. Quercus affinis, Q. crassipes. Biology. Only the females are known. The mature gall was collected in May; adults emerged by the end of May. Distribution. Mexico: Hidalgo and Mexico States.

Amphibolips aliciae Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey Amphibolips aliciae Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey, 2010: 52. Type material examined: HOLOTYPE ♀ deposited in MNCN (Cat n��2023) ��� PANAMA, Chiriqu��, Carretera de Volcancito, Boquete 8�� 46��� 23 7��� N, 82�� 27��� 19 7��� W, 1404 m, Ex Q. salicifolia, (25.i.2009) 25.i.09, E. Medianero leg���. Paratypes: a male with the same data as holotype, but one (12.i.2008) ii.08, E. Medianero leg. One paratype in MNCN. Additional material: Deposited in UB with the following labels: ���MEX-595, MEXICO, Cuapancingo, Puebla, (18.ii.2013) iii.2013: 1♂ (UB), Ex Q. crassifolia, leg. Alondra ���; ���P189, MEXICO, Aconco, Tetela de Ocampo, Pueb-la, (11.ix.2012) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp. ���; ���P291, MEXICO, Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa, Puebla, (27.vi.2016) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp.���; ���P375, MEXICO, San Pedro Hueytentan, Cuautempan, Puebla, 19��42���50���N, 97��49���21.22���W, 1599m.a.s.l., (14.vi.2018) only galls, (UB), Ex Q. crassifolia ���; ���S345, MEXICO, Aconco, Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla, (12.ix.2012) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp., leg, A. Equihua ���. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by its clear forewings with only one heavily infuscate patch at the base of the radial cell (Fig. 13A); broad and complete notauli delimited by an internal carina on posterior half of mesoscutum (Fig. 12A); mesoscutellar posterior emargination shallow, only slightly emarginate. This species most closely resembles A. kinseyi n. sp. but differs by a complete notauli (incomplete in A. kinesyi n. sp.); upper face coarsely reticulate-rugose (alutaceous in A. kinseyi n. sp.); speculum glabrous and finely rugate (sparsely pubescent and transversally carinated in A. kinseyi n. sp.); metasomal tergum II with fine, almost inconspicuous, micropunctures on posterior 1/3 (posterior 1/3 metasomal tergum II conspicuously micropunctate in A. kinseyi n. sp.). The forewing pattern also resembles A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov., but the tarsal claws with an acute basal lobe in A. aliciae (simple in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.); and the notauli are complete, shallow, and not delimited by carinae in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov. Galls of A. aliciae are fusiform, fragile onto smallest pressure, internal hollowlike space with thin filaments radiating from the central larval chamber (Figs 14B, 14D); while galls of A. kinseyi n. sp. and A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov. are subglobose, hard, with internal space obliterated by a spongious parenchyma. The internal structure of A. aliciae gall also resembles the gall of A. salicifoliae, which are hollow with radiating filaments. However, they can be differentiating by the shape and gall location: fusiform galls on buds in A. aliciae and spherical galls on leaves in A. salicifoliae. Gall (Figs 14 A���D). A fusiform bud gall with a fine tip and base, with a hard, lignified outer shell, 2.5 mm long. Internal space hollow with thin filaments radiating from the central larval chamber, 5���6 mm in diameter. Hosts. Quercus salicifolia (Panama); Q. crassifolia (Mexico, new record). Biology. Only the sexual generation is known. Galls were collected from January to March; adults emerged shortly after gall collecting. Distribution. Panama (original description), Mexico: Puebla state, new record., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, V��ctor, Equihua-Mart��nez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibri��n-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ru��z, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, S��nchez, Imelda Virginia L��pez, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 4-5, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Medianero, E. & Nieves-Aldrey, J. L. (2010) The genus Amphibolips Reinhard (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Cynipini) in the Neotropics, with description of three new species from Panama. Zootaxa, 2360 (1), 47 - 62. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2360.1.3"]}

Amphibolips kinseyi Cuesta-Porta & Pujade-Villar n. sp. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 492C322A-88EC-42A5-BC0F-F600EC66887B Type material. HOLOTYPE. ♀ (deposited in AMNH) with the following labels: “ MEXICO, Ciudad de Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico ” (white label), “ Q. crassipes, (01.xii.1932) leg. Kinsey ” (white label); Holotype Amphibolips kinseyi Cuesta-Porta & JP-V n. sp., desig. Cuesta-Porta, 2020” (red label). Etymology. Named in honor of Alfred C. Kinsey (1894–1956) who greatly contributed to the knowledge of Amphibolips and the American cynipid fauna. Diagnosis. The new species is characterized by incomplete notauli margined dorsally by carinae on posterior half of mesoscutum; mesoscutellum margined laterally by strong carina that emarginate posterior depression of mesoscutellum, both laterally and posteriorly. Most closely resembles A. aliciae by the forewing colouration, notauli emarginate by carina on dorsal side. It differentiate by brown to chestnut head and mesosoma, ambarine metasoma (head and mesosoma black, metasoma rufous in A. aliciae), strongly emarginated mesoscutellum laterally and posteriorly (not emarginate in A. aliciae); frons alutaceous with fine rugae (coarsely reticulate-rugose in A. aliciae). Forewing colouration also resembles those of A. salicifoliae and A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov., but in A. kinseyi n. sp. infuscate area on basal margin of radial cell larger, tarsal claws with basal lobe (claws simple in A. salicifoliae and A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.). Furthermore, bud galls of the new species are ovate with lignified parenchyma while galls of A. aliciae are fragile, fusiform, internal hollow with radiating filaments supporting the larval chamber. The gall is similar to other species with a large globular shape without mottled surface and not deformable at finger pressure (as A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov. and A. bassae n. sp.), but the size is smaller, around 20 mm in diameter. Description. (Figs 6 A–6G). Female. Body length: 3.8 mm. (N=1) Colour. Head chestnut; antennae brown in basal half and ambarine distally; mesosoma chestnut to brown; legs brown, ambarine distally, coxae chestnut to brown, femora and tibiae light brown, except ambarine tarsi; metasoma ambarine. Head (Figs 6 B–6D) trapezoidal in anterior view, 2.6x as broad as long from above, 1.4x as broad as high in anterior view and slightly narrower than mesosoma; frons with fine rugae, alutaceous interspaces, almost glabrous; lower face alutaceous, with more dense white setae. Gena dull rugose, slightly broadened behind eye, not visible behind eyes in anterior view, as broad as cross diameter of eye; malar space dull, delicately rugate; height of eye 1.7x as long as length of malar space. POL 0.8–0.9x as long as OOL; diameter of lateral ocellus equal to LOL; ocelli ovate. Transfacial distance 1.4x as broad as height of eye; diameter of antennal torulus subequal to distance between toruli, distance between torulus and inner margin of eye 1.7x as long as diameter of torulus. Clypeus dull smooth, ventrally projected, without median incision; anterior tentorial pits deep, epistomal sulcus conspicuous, clypeopleurostomal line distinct. Frons, vertex, interocellar area and occiput uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces. Occiput without dorsal carina. Labial palpus 3-segmented, maxillary palpus 5-segmented. Antenna (Fig. 6G) with 11 flagellomeres; slightly longer than head+mesosoma; scape 1.8x as long as pedicel; pedicel subglobose, slightly longer than broad; F1 subequal to scape+pedicel and 1.3x as long as F2; F2 as long as F3; F3 nearly equal in length to F4, subsequent flagellomeres shorter, F11 partially divided, 1.8x as long as F10; placodeal sensilla visible on F5–F11, absent on F1–F4. Mesosoma (Figs 6 D–6E) only slightly longer than high. Pronotum smooth dorsally, with numerous faint irregular rugae laterally. Mesoscutum round, uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces, rugose sculpture fainter and dull smooth interspaces on convergent point of median sulcus and notauli on posterior part; 0.8x as long as broad in dorsal view (largest width measured across mesoscutum on the level of tegulae base). Notauli incomplete, distinct under rugose sculpture on posterior half; notaular furrow faintly rugose with smooth interspaces; anterior parallel lines extending to almost half length of mesoscutum, slightly elevated, mesoscutum impressed along both sides of lines; parapsidal lines distinct, originating from posterior margin and extending to nearly half length of mesoscutum; median mesoscutal sulcus present, shiny smooth furrow; parascutal carina short, extending to level of tegula. Mesoscutellum 0.5x as long as mesoscutum, coarsely rugose with alutaceous interspaces, quadrangular, as broad as long, slightly overhanging metanotum, emarginate laterally; scutellar foveae quadrangular, shallow, faint median carina dividing the base of mesoscutellum into two halves, smooth foveae with faint transversal carinae connected to median carina, lateral sides of foveae with strong narrow carinae, separating them from dorsoaxillar area, posteriorly limited by rugate sculpture. Mesoscutellum with posteromedian depression emarginate by strong carinae. Mesopleuron uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces and sparsely pubescent, some rugae orientated into transverse faint subparallel striae. Mesopleural triangle rugose; dorsoaxillar area with faint rugae; lateral axillar area and axillula rugate, with few short, white setae; subaxilular bar smooth, shining, with parallel sides, its height less than height of metanotal trough, most posterior part extending to half height of mesoscutellum; postalar process long, with parallel striae; metapleural sulcus hidden under dull rugose sculpture. Metascutellum uniformly coriaceous, metanotal trough coriaceous, with dense white setae; ventral impressed area smooth, slightly shorter than height of metascutellum; central propodeal area faintly rugate, dull; lateral propodeal carinae high, subparallel, slightly curved outwards medially; lateral propodeal area with irregular strong wrinkles and dense white setae; nucha short, with irregular wrinkles around. Legs with sparse short white setae; tarsal claws with basal lobe. Forewing longer than body, mostly hyaline, with short dense cilia on margin, with dark stripe on basal part of radial cell, veins dark brown; radial cell narrow, long, opened on margin, 4.0x as long as broad; R1 and Rs nearly reaching wing margin; areolet infuscate, small, almost invisible, internal space round, closed; Rs+M reaching basalis at its half height. Metasoma (Fig. 6F) as long as head+mesosoma, 1.2x as long as high in lateral view; 2nd metasomal tergum occupy nearly 2/3 of metasoma length, smooth, shining, with short sparse setae dorsolaterally and with larger patch of dense setae ventrolaterally; posterior third conspicuously finely punctate dorsally and laterally, posterior margin with a narrow smooth band, without punctures; all subsequent terga dorsally and laterally uniformly and entirely micropunctate, with a narrow smooth band posteriorly on each tergum. Ventral spine of hypopygium robust, short, needle-like, prominent part 5.0x as long as broad, with two rows of white setae each side, extending beyond apex of spine. Gall (Fig. 16J). A relatively small, subglobose bud gall. The body of the gall reaches its greatest diameter near the middle, up to 20 mm in diameter. The gall is thick-walled, with lignified parenchyma, light brown when mature, with a smooth and naked surface; with spongious hard parenchyma internally; the hard-walled, ovate central larval chamber, with a mature length of 5.0– 6.5 mm. Host. Quercus crassipes. Biology. Only females are known. Mature galls were collected in December. Distribution. Mexico: Ciudad de Mexico. Remarks. This species was collected by Kinsey in 1932 and it was never described. Deposited in the Kinsey collection at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) as an ‘unidentified Amphibolips ’. Characters are clearly differing from any other Amphibolips species (see diagnosis)., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 18-20, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340

Amphibolips nassa Kinsey Amphibolips nassa Kinsey 1937: 432. Type material examined: HOLOTYPE. ♀ (deposited in AMNH) with the following labels: “Purépero, 5W, Mich. 8500, Mex., ⊕ 12.25.31” (handwritten, white label); “ Q. serrulata Kinsey coll.” (handwritten, white label); “ Amphibolips nassa ParaHolotype ” (handwritten, red label). Diagnosis. This species is characterized with a deep and almost smooth scutellar foveae, indistinctly separated medially by indistinct, incomplete carina; longitudinal depression shallow anteriorly, almost reaches foveae, deep on posterior end of mesoscutellum; posterolateral margins forming small obtuse tips (Fig. 11G); forewing completely infuscate with a strongly infuscate band on anterior margin; veins Rs and 2r inconspicuous through infuscate band or hardly traceable (Fig. 13G). Amphibolips nassa closely resembles A. zacatecaensis but differs in scutellar foveae almost smooth and undivided, without transversal carinae in A. nassa (with strong median carina and transversal carinae in A. zacatecaensis); posteromedian depression projected anteriorly, reaching posterior margin of foveae, deep on posterior edge (depression shallow not projected to anterior margin in A. zacatecaensis); posterolateral margins ended in small tips (completely rounded in A. zacatecaensis); metasomal tergum II with posterior coriaceous sculpture before band of micropunctures (completely smooth in A. zacatecaensis); and galls (A. nassa are subglobose, but a bit fusiform with a tip and a base, with lignified spongious parenchyma while in A. zacatecaensis galls are fragile, globose with a tiny tip at apex, with soft spongious parenchyma. The galls are very similar to A. nevadensis and A. rulli n. sp.; galls of these species cannot be differentiated, only by the uniformly brown surface of the galls of A. nassa (mottled in A. nevadensis and A. rulli n. sp.), and the host plants are different; Amphibolips nassa in buds of Q. castanea, A. nevadensis galls on Q. calophylla and A. rulli n. sp. on Q. eduardi and Q. viminea. All these galls are subglobose, hard and with an apical tip, resulting from the longitudinal elongation of the gall. Gall (Figs 15 F–G). A rather large, subglobose, slightly fusiform, elongated bud oak apple, up to 48 mm in diameter, detachable, with a fine tip and base; with hard, lignified parenchyma. Larval chamber central or near the base of the gall, on buds. Host. According to the original description, Q. castanea. Biology. Galls were collected in December; the only known adult was dissected out of the gall. Distribution. Mexico: Michoacán state. Remarks. Kinsey (1937) mentioned that similar galls were collected in the same place on Q. mexicana by Morelia from the same host plant as the holotype, but after knowing that different species are found in similar galls, we cannot assure this citation was correct., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on page 22, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Kinsey, A. C. (1937) New Mexican Gall Wasps (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae). Revista de Entomologia, 7 (4), 428 - 471."]}

Amphibolips durangensis Nieves-Aldrey & Maldonado Amphibolips durangensis Nieves-Aldrey & Maldonado, 2012. In Nieves-Aldrey et al., 2012: 9–11. Type material examined. HOLOTYPE. ♀ deposited in MNCN, dissected and mounted on a stub (Cat. nº 2246; Code: 89198). “ MEXICO, Durango, Palmito, N 23º 33’ 49.4” W 105º 51’ 08.8”, 1977 m; Ex Q. scytophylla Liebm. (Fagaceae), (08.vii.2008) x.2008; leg. Y. Maldonado”. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by completely infuscate forewings with a complete transversal clear band on distal third; absence of notauli; scutellar foveae indistinctly separated medially, bottom of scutellar foveae with longitudinal rugae medially (Fig. 11B). Closely resembles A. castroviejoi by the forewing pattern but differs by the presence of notauli and conspicuous median carina dividing scutellar foveae in A. castroviejoi. The gall of this species closely resembles A. fusus, differs by the elongation of both, peduncle and apical tip, thinner in A. durangensis; surface of galls is crossed by longitudinal ridges in A. durangensis and smooth in A. fusus. Gall. Galls on buds, fusiform, maximum 43–54 mm in diameter, with elongate thin peduncle and apical tip; outer shell thin, hard, usually smooth with longitudinal ridges; internal spongious soft tissue with central larval chamber, around 5 mm (Nieves-Aldrey et al. 2012: Figs 18C–D). Host. Quercus scytophylla. Biology. Only females are known. The mature galls were collected in early July; adults emerged in October. Distribution. Mexico: Durango State., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on page 13, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Nieves-Aldrey, J. L., Pascual, E., Maldonado-Lopez, Y., Medianero, E. & Oyama, K. (2012) Revision of the Amphibolips species of Mexico excluding the \" niger complex \" Kinsey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), with description of seven new species. Zootaxa, 3545 (1), 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3545.1.1"]}

Amphibolips zacatecaensis Melika & Pujade-Villar Amphibolips zacatecaensis Melika & Pujade-Villar, 2011.In Melika et al., 2011: 48 Type material examined. HOLOTYPE. ♀ (deposited in JP-V col., UB) with the following labels: “ MEXICO, Monte Escobedo, Zacatecas ” (white label), “ Q. eduardi, (31.v.2010) ext. 31.v.10. leg. J. Pujade-Villar ” (white la-bel). “ Holotype Amphibolips zacatecaensis Pujade-Villar & Melika 2011 ” (red label). Additional material. Deposited in UB with the following labels: “S120, MEXICO, Las Cuevitas, Monte Esc-obedo, Zacatecas, (25.x.2011) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp.”. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by a completely infuscate forewing with infuscate anterior band; basal half of radial cell highly infuscate; R1, Rs and 2r veins not traceable through infuscate band or hardly visible. Scutellar foveae with distinct median carina and transversal carinae extending from the median carina (Fig. 11K). Most closely resembles A. nassa (see Diagnosis to A. nassa). The gall resembles that of A. dampfi, but in A. zacatecaensis the internal tissue is dense and light brown while it is soft, cotton-like, white to rosy near the larval chamber in A. dampfi. Gall (Figs 15 C–D). Galls on buds, rather large, with maximum diameter 50–68 mm, subglobose, gradually tapering to a tip at apex; outer shell thin and fragile, usually smooth, sometimes wrinkled or rugose; internal tissue soft, light brown and spongious, but consistent with central larval chamber, which is around 5 mm in diameter. Host. Quercus eduardi. Biology. Only females are known. The mature galls were collected in late May; adults emerged soon after field collection. Distribution. Mexico: Zacatecas State., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 34-39, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Melika, G., Equihua-Martinez, A., Estrada-Venegas, E. G., Cibrian-Tovar, D., Cibrian-Llanderal, V. D. & Pujade-Villar, J. (2011) New Amphibolips gallwasp species from Mexico (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Zootaxa, 3105 (1), 47 - 59. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3105.1.2"]}

Amphibolips tarasco Nieves-Aldrey & Pascual Amphibolips tarasco Nieves-Aldrey & Pascual, 2012. In Nieves-Aldrey et al., 2012: 22–24 Type material examined. HOLOTYPE. ♀ deposited in MNCN (Cat. nº 2250; Code: 89207). MEXICO, Micho-acán, Santa María, 2000 m; Ex Q. castanea, (12.iii.2005) 22.iii.2005, leg. E. Pascual. Paratypes (deposited in MNCN): 1♀ & 2♂ with the same data as the holotype (Codes: 89208–89210, respectively). Additional material. MEX-136 ‘ La Mojonera’ explanada, dentro de los terrenos del Parque Africam. Blvd. Cap. Carlos, Camacho Espiritu, Oasis, Tecali de Herrera, Puebla (Mexico), Ex Q. acutifolia, (iv.2012) 1–15.v.2012: 5♂ & 4♀ (UB), Lilia Ramírez leg.; MEX-137, ídem, Ex Q. mexicana, (v.2012) v.2012: 1♂ & 2♀ (UB), Lilia Ramírez leg.; MEX-456, Carretera Federal Morelia-Uruapan Km. 42, Uruapan, Michoacán (México), Ex Q. castanea, (19.vi.2018) extrac. 19.vi.2018: 1♀ (UB), JP-V, Equihua & Estrada leg. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by triangular scutellar foveae with median carina shorter than total length of foveae, rest of posterior length of foveae covered by coarse rugose sculpture till the lateral margins of foveae. Lateral margin of eye with dorsolateral fine carinae irradiating from eye, rest of margin alutaceous-smooth. Adults closely resemble A. hidalgoensis and A. oaxacae (see Diagnosis to the corresponding species). Gall (Figs 16 H–I). A subglobose large bud gall, with maximum 40 mm in diameter, with thin, slightly lignified and resistant outer shell. Pale green with darker green spots when fresh and turning brown when dry. The gall is monolocular, with a spongy internal tissue, filling the entire gall. The larval cell is rounded. Hosts. Quercus acutifolia, Q. castanea, Q. mexicana. Biology. The sexual generation is only known. The galls were collected between March and June; adults emerged in the same months of collection. Distribution. Mexico: Michoacán and Puebla States. Remarks. Females in this study differ slightly from the holotype by the scutellar foveae, which in the new specimens are finely rugose and oblique, resembling more the type male mesoscutellum. New male specimens identical with the males from the type material., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 32-33, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Nieves-Aldrey, J. L., Pascual, E., Maldonado-Lopez, Y., Medianero, E. & Oyama, K. (2012) Revision of the Amphibolips species of Mexico excluding the \" niger complex \" Kinsey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), with description of seven new species. Zootaxa, 3545 (1), 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3545.1.1"]}

Key to the Amphibolips galls of the ‘ nassa’ complex of Mexico and Central America 1. Galls growing on the underside of the leaves................................................................ 2 1’. Galls growing on buds................................................................................. 4 2. Turgescent spherical galls (Figs 14 F–G). Turning into a raisin-like wrinkled mass when dry............... A. turulli n. sp. 2’. Solid galls, sometimes very fragile, never turgescent. Galls either spherical or toadstool shaped. Maintaining its shape when dry................................................................................................ 3 3. Toadstool-shaped galls. With an elongated stem. Light green coloured, sometimes tinged with rose or pink when young. Internal solid spongious parenchyma (Lyon 1959: Plate 12, Figs A–B)................. A. quercuspomiformis n. comb. (sex). 3’. Spherical fragile galls. Greenish when fresh and dark brown when dry. Internal space hollow with hard filaments radiating from the larval chamber (Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey 2010: Figs 8 G–H).................................. A. salicifoliae 4. Galls with internal space hollow with hard filaments radiating from larval chamber (Figs 14 A–D). When dry the gall is very fragile and may be easily broken with minimal finger pressure. Fusiform galls with mottled surface............. A. aliciae 4’. Galls with internal spongious parenchyma, sometimes soft but does not break with applied finger pressure (Figs 14E, 14H, 14K). From spherical to fusiform galls, sometimes mottled.................................................... 5 5. Galls elongated at their base, with thick peduncle, central body subglobose, with smooth and mottled surface, never with an apical tip (Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey 2010: Figs 8 A–C).......................................... A. castroviejoi 5’. Different galls, whether globular galls without visible peduncle, sometimes with apical tip, or fusiform galls with both apical tip and thin peduncle.................................................................................. 6 6. Multilocular galls with up to 50 larval chambers (Figs 16 C–D). Surface yellowish to orange-rufous when mature, turning brownish orange when dry (Figs 16 A–B).…................................ A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov. (asex) 6’. Monolocular galls (Fig. 16F). Green or brown when mature, sometimes mottled. Turning to uniform brown when dry..... 7 7. Globular galls with apical tip (sometimes short) or fusiform galls (pointed and sometimes pedunculate) (Figs 14E, 14 H–K, 15C–I).............................................................................................. 8 7’. Spherical or sub-spherical galls with neither apical tip nor peduncle (Figs 15 A–B, 16A–J).......................... 16 8. Fusiform galls; peduncle subequal to apical tip (Figs 14E, 14H)................................................ 9 8’. Globular galls; peduncle absent or distinctly shorter than apical tip (Figs 14 I–K, 15C–I)............................ 11 9. Very elongated galls (Fig. 14H), more than 10x as long as maximum width; peduncle and apical tip strongly elongate. Outer shell fragile, thin.......................................................................... A. bromus n. sp. 9’. Wide fusiform galls, 3.0x as long as maximum width; peduncle and apical tip less than several times longer than central body (Fig. 14E). Outer shell firm, not fragile................................................................... 10 10. Surface with longitudinal ridges (Nieves-Aldrey et al 2012: Figs 18C–D). Peduncle and apical tip strongly narrowed into needle-like elongation...................................................................... A. durangensis 10’. Surface smooth, without longitudinal ridges (Fig. 14E). Peduncle and apical tip gradually narrowing in obtuse angle.................................................................................................... A. fusus 11. Small hard galls, up to 20 mm in diameter, with rugose surface and short apical tip (Figs 14 I–K). Outer shell thick, firm, with highly lignified parenchyma..................................................................... A. cibriani 11’. Large galls, up to 60 mm in diameter, with smooth surface. Outer shell thin, firm or soft. If firm, apical tip is the result of longitudinal elongation of gall (Figs 15 C–I).................................................................. 12 12. Teardrop shaped galls (Figs 15 F–I). Hard, do not deform at finger pressure. Surface usually mottled. Apical tip elongated, gradually narrowing apically, following more or less the shape of the gall........................................ 13 12’. Subglobular galls (Figs 15 C–E), can be deformed with applied finger pressure. Surface uniform in colour. Apical tip short..................................................................................................... 15 13. Globular galls, small size (around 20x 15 mm), gradually narrowing and ending in a short apical point. Surface mottled. On Q. calophylla................................................................................. A. nevadensis 13’. Rather large galls (Figs 15 F–I), longer than wide (up to 55x 35 mm), slightly spindle-shaped at apex with a long tip, surface mottled or not, host different............................................................................ 14 14. Gall surface uniformly brown, never mottled (Figs 15 F–G). Apical tip narrow and slightly tortuous. On Q. castanea..................................................................................................... A. nassa 14’. Gall surface mottled (Fig. 15H). Apical tip straight, narrowing gradually following the shape of the gall (Fig. 15I). On Q. eduardi, Q. emoryi and Q. viminea................................................................. A. rulli n. sp. 15. Surface yellowish brown. Internal tissue uniformly light brown, relatively consistent, firm. Apical tip short and narrow, sometimes bent (Figs 15 C–D).................................................................... A. zacatecaensis 15’. Surface chestnut brown. Internal tissue white to rosy around larval chamber, soft, cotton-like; light brown towards the surface. Apical tip short, but broad (Fig. 15E)............................................................... A. dampfi 16. Deformable with fingers pressure, parenchyma relatively soft. Uniformly light brown when dry (Figs 15 A–B)....................................................................... A. hidalgoensis / A. michoacaensis / A. jaliscensis 16’. Hard galls not deformable by finger pressure, with lignified parenchyma. Colour sometimes different................. 17 17. Regularly spherical. Surface light green with whitish mottles when mature; turning to uniformly light brown when dry (Figs 16 H–I)............................................................................ A. oaxacae / A. tarasco 17’. Subspherical, with small elongation towards the base. Surface never mottled and darker in colour (Figs 16 E–F, 16J)...... 18 18. Small gall, up to 20 mm in diameter with dark brown surface (Fig. 16J)............................... A. kinseyi n. sp. 18’. Usually large galls, up to 40 mm of diameter. Surface olive green when mature and turning brownish green when dry (Figs 16 E–G)................................................................................. A. bassae n. sp., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 41-42, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Lyon, R. J. (1959) An alternating, sexual generation in the gall wasp Callirhytis pomiformis (Ashm.) (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae). Bulletin, Soc. Calif. Academy of Sciences, 58 (1), 33 - 37.","Medianero, E. & Nieves-Aldrey, J. L. (2010) The genus Amphibolips Reinhard (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Cynipini) in the Neotropics, with description of three new species from Panama. Zootaxa, 2360 (1), 47 - 62. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2360.1.3","Nieves-Aldrey, J. L., Pascual, E., Maldonado-Lopez, Y., Medianero, E. & Oyama, K. (2012) Revision of the Amphibolips species of Mexico excluding the \" niger complex \" Kinsey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), with description of seven new species. Zootaxa, 3545 (1), 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3545.1.1"]}

Amphibolips michoacaensis Nieves-Aldrey & Maldonado Amphibolips michoacaensis Nieves-Aldrey & Maldonado, 2012. In Nieves-Aldrey et al., 2012: 24–26. Type material examined. HOLOTYPE. ♀ deposited in MNCN (Cat. nº 2251; Code: 89211). MEXICO, Micho-acán, Cuenca del Cuitzeo, Umécuaro, N 19° 32´55.4´´ W 101° 15´37.2´´, 2140 m; Ex Q. castanea, (10.iv.2009) x.2009, leg. Y. Maldonado. Paratypes (deposited in MNCN): 2♂ showing the same data as the holotype; 1♀ with the same data as the holotype, but emerged 04.vi.2008; 2♀ collected at Jesús del Monte, 2133 m, Ex Q. castanea, (21.iv.2009) v.2009, leg. Y. Maldonado (Codes: 89212–89216). Additional material. MEX 081, Zacatecas, Monte Escobedo, Laguna de Garboa, N 22º 16’ 57.74’’ W103º 33’ 05.28’’, Q. emoryi, (24.v.11) 10.vi.11: 1♂ & 1♀ (UB), Cabral, Treto, Landa & Carrillo leg. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by smooth scutellar foveae with a strong median carina completely dividing the foveae (Fig. 11F); posteromedian depression interrupted by transversal carina (Fig. 5D, posterior view), depression not reaches posterior margin of mesoscutellum. Closely resembles A. jaliscensis (see diagnosis to A. jaliscensis). The large globular gall is similar to other species, with or without mottled surface (Nieves-Aldrey et al. 2012: Figs 20A–B); impossible to differentiate from A. hidalgoensis and A. jaliscensis but differs from A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov., A. oaxacae, A. tarasco, A. kinseyi n. sp. and A. bassae n. sp. by the deformable surface at finger pressure because of the relatively soft parenchyma in A. hidalgoensis, A. jaliscensis and A. michoacaensis. Gall. A subglobose large bud gall, up to 48 mm in diameter, outer shell thin but resistant, uniformly pale green, turning into brown when dry. The gall is monolocular, with a spongy internal tissue, filling the entire gall. The larval cell is rounded (Nieves-Aldrey et al. 2012: Figs 20A–B). Host. Quercus castanea, Q. emoryi. Biology. Only the sexual generation is known. Galls were collected between April and May; adults emerged between May and October of the same year of collection. Distribution. Mexico: Michoacan and Zacatecas states. Remarks. Nieves-Aldrey et al. (2012) described the males with 12 flagellomeres, however, the antenna has 13 flagellomeres (type specimens examined). This species shares several characters with A. jaliscensis, including the forewing pattern, that were originally used as diagnostic (Nieves-Aldrey et al. 2012), and the gall morphology is also similar between the two species (see corresponding remarks under A. jaliscenis)., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on page 20, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Nieves-Aldrey, J. L., Pascual, E., Maldonado-Lopez, Y., Medianero, E. & Oyama, K. (2012) Revision of the Amphibolips species of Mexico excluding the \" niger complex \" Kinsey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), with description of seven new species. Zootaxa, 3545 (1), 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3545.1.1"]}

Amphibolips turulli Pujade-Villar & Cuesta-Porta n. sp. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: F51F1267-B3D4-4703-AD94-F03E9F16C400 Type material. HOLOTYPE. ♀ (deposited in UB) with the following labels: “ MEXICO, Predio La Victoria, Aco-caxoithlan, Hidalgo ” (white label), “ Q. affinis, (12.vi.2012) 1–7.vii.2012 U. Barrera-Ruiz leg.” (white label). Holo-type Amphibolips turulli Pujade Villar & Cuesta-Porta n. sp., desig. Cuesta-Porta, 2020” (red label). Additional material. Deposited in UB with the following labels: “S318, MEXICO, Propiedad la Victoria, Bar-rio la Tlazintla, Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, (08.vi.2010) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp., leg. U. Barrera-Ruiz ”. Etymology. Named in honour of Jordi Turull i Negre. Diagnosis. The new species is characterized by the forewing colouration completely infuscate except for two hyaline zones: one incomplete clear cross band on distal third not reaching posterior margin of wing, and a second clear basal half of discoidal cell; the female is characterized by a strong emarginate mesoscutellum, forming a Vshaped depression; mesoscutellum with two posterolateral horn-like projections bent upwards. Closely resembles A. dampfi. The new species differs from A. dampfi by the laterad coriaceous area of parapsidal lines (rugose in A. dampfi) and turgescent leaf gall (large fragile subglobose bud gall in A. dampfi). It is the only species in Mexico and Central America with turgescent galls. Description. (Figs 10 A–10F). Female. Body length: 7.5 mm (N=1) Colour. Head black, except chestnut brown mandibles; antennae black on basal half and chestnut to brown distally, mesosoma black, coxae and femur black, tibiae and tarsi brown, metasoma black. Head (Figs 10 B–10C) quadrangular in anterior view, 2.6x as broad as long from above, 1.2x as broad as high in anterior view and slightly narrower than mesosoma; frons and lower face uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces; frons with scattered setae, lower face with white setae. Gena faintly rugose with alutaceous interspaces, broadened behind eye, visible behind eyes in anterior view, 1.2x as broad as cross diameter of eye; malar space dull, faintly rugose; height of eye 1.3x as long as length of malar space. POL subequal to OOL; diameter of lateral ocellus 1.7x as long as LOL; ocelli ovate. Transfacial distance 1.6x as broad as height of eye; diameter of antennal torulus 3.3x as long as distance between toruli, distance between torulus and inner margin of eye 1.2–1.3x as long as diameter of torulus, faint irregular carina going from ventral margin of toruli to tentorial pits. Clypeus smooth, ovate, projected over mandibles, with ventral margin slightly sinuate; anterior tentorial pits deep, epistomal sulcus and clypeo-pleurostomal lines obscured, hardly traceable. Frons, vertex, interocellar area and occiput uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces. Occiput with dorsal faint carina. Labial palpus 3-segmented, maxillary palpus 5-segmented. Antenna (Fig. 10E) with 11 flagellomeres; slightly longer than head+mesosoma, scape 1.6x as long as pedicel; pedicel subglobose, slightly broader than long; F1 1.5x as long as scape+pedicel and 1.6x as long as F2; F2 1.2x as long as F3; F3 nearly equal in length to F4 and F5 respectively, subsequent flagellomeres shorter, F11 2.6x as long as F10; placodeal sensilla visible on F4–F11, absent on F1–F3. Mesosoma (Figs 10 C–10D) 1.2x as long as high. Pronotal plate smooth, rugate laterally; propleuron black. Mesoscutum uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces; round, 0.9x as long as broad in dorsal view (largest width measured across mesoscutum on the level of tegulae base). Notauli incomplete, almost reaching anterior margin, distinct under rugose sculpture, sulci sculptured as rest of mesoscutum, rugae forming subparallel transverse carinae; anterior parallel lines visible under sculpture, elevate, surrounded by alutaceous sculpture, extending to almost half of mesoscutum length; parapsidal lines distinct, originating from posterior margin and extending to nearly half length of mesoscutum, elevated, alutaceous; median mesoscutal sulcus absent; parascutal carina short, extending to level of tegula. Mesoscutellum 0.5x as long as mesoscutum, coarsely dull rugose, quadrangular, as broad as long, overhanging metanotum, emarginate laterally, with posterolateral horn-like projections pointing upwards; scutellar foveae round, deep, and dull with transversal carinae, lateral sides of foveae, limited posteriorly by coarsely rugate sculpture. Longitudinal median depression crossing the mesoscutellum including foveae, narrow anteriorly, broadening posteriorly, emarginate laterally by irregular carinae, dull rugose; transversal carina crossing depression at half height in posterior view, depression continues to posterior margin of mesoscutellum. Mesopleuron uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces and sparse pubescent, some rugae orientated into transverse subparallel striae. Mesopleural triangle rugose; dorsoaxillar area rugose; lateral axillar area and axillula faintly rugose, with few short, white setae; subaxilular bar smooth, shining, with parallel sides on anterior part, its height less than height of metanotal trough, most posterior part extending to half height of mesoscutellum; postalar process long, with parallel striae; metapleural sulcus hidden under dull rugose sculpture. Metascutellum uniformly faintly rugoso-coriaceous, metanotal trough smooth, with sparse white setae; ventral impressed area alutaceous, slightly shorter than height of metascutellum; central propodeal area rugate, shining; lateral propodeal carinae distinct, partially covered by sculpture, subparallel, curves outwards medially, extended posteriorly to lateral sides of nucha; lateral propodeal area with irregular strong wrinkles and dense white setae; nucha short, alutaceous with faint wrinkles. Legs with coxae and femora black, tibiae and tarsi brown, with sparse short white setae; tarsal claws with basal lobe. Forewing (Fig. 10A) longer than body, with short dense cilia on margin; completely infuscate, except from transversal stripe covering basal half of discoidal cell; distal third with clear longitudinal stripe extended posteriorly not reaching margin of wing, covering distal third of radial medial to half-height of discoidal cell; veins dark brown; radial cell narrow, heavily infuscate basally, long, opened on margin, 3.3x as long as broad; R1 nearly reaching wing margin; areolet visible, elongate towards basalis, closed; Rs+M reaching basalis at its half height. Metasoma (Fig. 10F) as long as head+mesosoma, slightly longer than high in lateral view; 2nd metasomal tergum reaching 2/3 of length of metasoma, smooth, shining, with short sparse setae laterally; conspicuous punctuation on almost posterior half, punctures becoming progressively fainter on anterior part, posterior margin with a very narrow smooth band, without punctures; all subsequent terga dorsally and laterally uniformly and entirely micropunctate, with a narrow smooth band posteriorly on each tergum. Ventral spine of hypopygium robust, short, needle-like, prominent part 3.3x as long as broad, with two rows of white setae each side, extending beyond apex of spine. Gall (Figs 14 F–G). A turgescent spherical gall located on the underside of leaves. The body of the gall is globose, with greatest diameter near middle of the gall measured from base to apex, up to 20–25 mm. The gall is thin-walled, olive green when mature and turns wrinkled when dry, with smooth and naked surface, succulent, with central ovate hard-walled larval chamber, with largest length of 5.0– 6.5 mm. Hosts. Quercus affinis. Biology. Only females are known. The mature galls were collected in late June; adults emerged in early July. Distribution. Mexico: Hidalgo State. Remarks. The gall of this new species is not usual for Mexican Amphibolips species, but two North American species have similar galls on the underside of leaves: A. quercusracemaria (Ashmead, 1881) from Florida (USA) on Q. laurifolia and A. nubilipennis (Harris, 1841) from Massachusetts on several species of red oaks. Nevertheless, the sculpture of the mesoscutum and the colour pattern of wings are different in A. quercusracemaria and A. nubilipennis.

Amphibolips rulli Pujade-Villar & Cuesta-Porta n. sp. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 8B5298B8-2E20-4055-A635-738E0A730C1F Type material. HOLOTYPE. ♀ (deposited in UB) with the following labels: “ MEXICO, Las Cuevitas, Zacatecas, 2270 m.a.s.l.” (white label); “ Q. viminea, (02.xi.2011) 17.xi.2011, leg. J. Pujade-Villar ” (white label); “ Holotype Amphibolips rulli JP-V & Cuesta-Porta n. sp., desig. Cuesta-Porta, 2020” (red label). Paratypes (deposited in UB): El Carril, Zacatecas, 2243 m.a.s.l., Ex Q. eduardi, (06.ix.2011) 19.x.2011: 1♀ (UB), leg. J. Pujade-Villar; Las Cuevitas, Zacatecas, 2270 m.a.s.l., 1♀ (UB), Ex Q. viminea, (17.x.2011) 26.x.2011, leg. J. Pujade-Villar; El Cuahilote, Zacatecas, 2162 m.a.s.l., Ex Q. viminea, (12.viii.2011) 06.ix.2011: 1♀ (UB). leg. J. Pujade-Villar; Zacatecas, 2243 m.a.s.l., Ex Q. emoryi, (27.iv.2011) 04.v.2011: 1♀ (UB), leg. J. Pujade-Villar. Additional material. Deposited in UB with the following labels: “MEX282, MEXICO, Los Chorritos, Cu-atepec de Hinojosa, Hidalgo, (14.x.2011) only galls (UB), Ex Q. eduardi, leg. JP-V, E. Estrada & A. Equihua ”; “MEX286, MEXICO, Laguna de Gomboa, Monte Escobedo, Zacatecas, 22º16’57.04” N 103º32’58.38” W, (27. iv.2010) only galls (UB), Ex Q. eduardi, leg. C. Carrillo ”; “MEX289, MEXICO, La Mesa del Carrizal, La Mesa del Carrizal, Sinaola, (20.ii.2012) only galls (UB), Ex Q. viminea, leg. JP-V ”; “ P065, MEXICO, San Isidro, Tecolotlán, Jalisco, 20° 59’ 15.44” N 102° 54’ 29.87” W, 2064 m.a.s.l., (04.xi.2011) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp., leg. C. Carrillo ”; “P146, MEXICO, Francia, Monte Escobedo, Zacatecas, 22º 25´20.79” N 103º 28´30.77” W, (03.xi.2010) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp., leg. JP-V ”; “ S032, MEXICO, Parque Nacional Zoquiapan y Anexas, Zoquiapan, Puebla, 3046 m.a.s.l., (30.v.2012) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp.”; “S066, MEXICO, Monte Escobedo, Monte Escobedo, Zacatecas, (21.vii.2011) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp. ”; “S068, MEXICO, Monte Escobedo, Monte Escobedo, Zacatecas, (21.vii.2011) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp. ”; “S073, MEXICO, El Muerto, El Pino, Zacate-cas, 22º2134.63” N 103º28´39.54” W, 2158 m.a.s.l., (14.v.2011) only galls (UB), Ex Q. eduardi ”; “S113, MEXICO, Menores, Monte Escobedo, Zacatecas, (27.x.2011) only galls (UB), Ex Quercus sp.”; “S319, MEXICO, Cañada de los Leones, Monte Escobedo, Zacatecas, (24.vi.2007) only galls (UB), Ex Q. eduardi ”. Etymology. Named in honor of Josep Rull i Andreu. Diagnosis. The new species is characterized by the dorsal projection, which is situated towards the anterior margin of the area of punctured sculpture on tergum II, never reaching half of the tergal length; smooth area bordering lateral margin of compound eye, usually posterodorsally limited by a carina; F1 1.6x as long as F2. Most closely resembles A. nevadensis but can be differentiated by the female metasomal tergum II, which is mainly polished, smooth with faint coriaceous sculpture bordering posterior punctures in the new species (metasomal tergum II completely coriaceous except for posterior band of micropunctures in A. nevadensis). Galls of both species are subglobose, elongate to an apical tip, with hard outer shell and mottled surface. Amphibolips nassa has similar galls but the adults strongly differ by the forewing colour pattern, degree of radial cell infuscatation: veins visible through infuscation in the new species (radial cell highly infuscate, hidden veins in A. nassa); scutellar foveae with transverse rugae, distinctly divided medially in the new species (notaular furrow smooth and scutellar foveae indistinctly separated medially in A. nassa). These species cannot be differentiated by galls, only by the host plant; Amphibolips nassa on Q. castanea, A. nevadensis on Q. calophylla and A. rulli n. sp. on Q. eduardi, Q. viminea. Description. (Figs 9 A–9G). Female. Body length 7.5 mm (n=4). Colour. Head black, except mandibles chestnut brown; antennae black, mesosoma black, legs chestnut brown, metasoma chestnut to black. Head (Figs 9 B–9C) ovate in anterior view, 2.4x as broad as long from above, 1.2x as broad as high in anterior view and narrower than mesosoma; frons and lower face uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces; frons almost glabrous, lower face with sparse white setae, with faint irregular carinae from ventral margin of toruli to tentorial pits. Gena faintly rugose with alutaceous interspaces, broadened behind eye, visible behind eyes in anterior view, 1.2x as broad as cross diameter of eye, smooth band on posterior margin of eye usually emarginate with distinct carina posterodorsally; malar space dull rugose on ventral half and alutaceous-smooth on ventral margin of eye; height of eye 1.4x as long as length of malar space. POL subequal to OOL; diameter of lateral ocellus 1.7x as long as LOL; ocelli ovate. Transfacial distance 1.5x as broad as height of eye; diameter of antennal torulus 2.6x as long as distance between toruli, distance between torulus and inner margin of eye subequal to diameter of torulus. Clypeus faintly rugoso-alutaceous, ovate, ventrally projected, covering part of mandibles, with ventral margin slightly incised medially; anterior tentorial pits deep, epistomal sulcus inconspicuous, clypeo-pleurostomal lines distinct. Frons, vertex, interocellar area and occiput uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces. Occiput with dorsal faint carina. Labial palpus 3-segmented, maxillary palpus 5-segmented. Antenna (Fig. 9A) with 11 flagellomeres; slightly longer than head+mesosoma, scape 2.0x as long as pedicel; pedicel subglobose, slightly broader than long; F1 slightly longer than scape+pedicel and 1.6x as long as F2; F2 1.3x as long as F3; F3 nearly equal in length to F4, subsequent flagellomeres shorter, F11 partially divided by sulcus, 2.5x as long as F10; placodeal sensilla visible on F5–F11, absent on F1–F4. Mesosoma (Figs 9 C–D, 9E) slightly longer than high. Pronotal plate smooth, rugate laterally; propleuron black. Mesoscutum round, uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces, 0.9x as long as broad in dorsal view (largest width measured across mesoscutum on the level of tegulae base). Notauli inconspicuous under rugose sculpture; anterior parallel lines visible under sculpture, elevated, surrounded by alutaceous sculpture, extending to almost half of mesoscutum length; parapsidal lines distinct, originating from posterior margin and extending to nearly half length of mesoscutum, elevated, surrounded by alutaceous sculpture; median mesoscutal sulcus absent; parascutal carina short, extending to level of tegula only. Mesoscutellum 0.4x as long as mesoscutum, coarsely dull rugose, quadrangular, slightly broader than long, slightly overhanging metanotum, emarginate laterally by carinae ended with small posterolateral tips slightly pointing upwards; scutellar foveae round, deep, shiny and smooth, lateral sides with strong narrow carinae; complete strong median carina dividing foveae, transversal carinae radiating from median carina, posteriorly emarginate by faint carinae; posterior margin of mesoscutellum with depression extended from posterior margin of scutellar fovea to posterior margin of mesoscutellum. Mesopleuron uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces and sparse pubescent, some rugae orientated into transverse subparallel striae on anterior margin. Mesopleural triangle rugose and pubescent; dorsoaxillar area rugose; lateral axillar area and axillula faintly rugose, with few short, white setae; subaxilular bar shining, smooth, with parallel sides in anterior part, height less than height of metanotal trough, posterior part extending to half height of mesoscutellum; postalar process long, with parallel striae. Metapleural sulcus hidden under dull rugose sculpture. Metanotum uniformly faintly rugatecoriaceous, metanotal trough smooth, with sparse white setae; impressed ventral area rugate-coriaceous, slightly shorter than height of metanotum. Central propodeal area rugate, dull; lateral propodeal carinae visible, partially covered by sculpture, subparallel, curves outwards medially, extended posteriorly to lateral sides of nucha; lateral propodeal area with irregular strong wrinkles and dense white setae; nucha short, alutaceous with faint wrinkles. Legs chestnut brown, with sparse short white setae; tarsal claws with basal lobe. Forewing (Fig. 9A) longer than body, with short dense cilia on margin; completely infuscate, with heavily infuscate band on anterior margin of wing not covering the costal cell; veins dark brown; radial cell narrow, long, opened on margin, 3.4x as long as broad; R1 not reaching wing margin; areolet visible, triangular, elongate towards basalis, closed; Rs+M reaching basalis at its half height. Metasoma (Figs 9E, 9G) as long as head+mesosoma, slightly longer than high in lateral view; metasomal tergum II reaching 2/3 of metasoma length, mainly shining smooth, with short sparse setae laterally; conspicuous punctuation on posterior third, micropunctures becoming progressively fainter anteriorly, punctures projected anteriorly forming a triangular projection on dorsal view, not reaching half height of tergum II, coriaceous sculpture sometimes present between half of tergum II and anterior margin of micropunctures, posterior margin of metasomal tergum II with a very narrow smooth band, without punctures; all subsequent terga dorsally and laterally uniformly and entirely micropunctate, with a narrow smooth band posteriorly on each tergum. Ventral spine of hypopygium robust, short, needle-like, prominent part 3.3x as long as broad, with two rows of white setae each side, extending beyond apex of spine. Gall (Figs 15 H–I). A subspherical, bud gall, fusiform at apex, ending in a tip, with greatest diameter near middle of the gall, up to 35 mm in diameter. The gall is thin-walled, olive green, mottled with clear spots when mature and turn brown when dry, mottles still visible; parenchyma rather lignified, rugose; internal tissue hard spongious, with central ovate hard-walled larval chamber, with mature length 5.0–6.0 mm. Hosts. Quercus eduardi, Q. emoryi, Q. viminea. Distribution. Mexico: Zacatecas State. Biology. Only females are known. Mature galls were collected in October; adults emerged in November., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 29-32, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340

Amphibolips salicifoliae Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey Amphibolips salicifoliae Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey, 2010: 55–60. Type material examined: HOLOTYPE. ♀ (deposited in MNCN), Cat nº 2024. PANAMA, Chiriquí, Volcan Baru 8º 47’ 50 8” N, 82º 29’ 35 9” W, 1800–2070m, Ex Q. salicifolia, (27.i.2009) ii.09, leg. E. Medianero. Paratypes: 2♂ & 2♀ with same data as the holotype (two paratypes deposited in MNCN, and two paratypes MEUP). Diagnosis. This species is characterized by the almost hyaline forewings in males and females, tarsal claws simple and notauli incomplete, short, distinct, with base of notaular groove smooth. This species closely resembles A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov. with which it shares the following character states: simple tarsal claws; mesoscutellum posteriorly not emarginated; speculum smooth and glabrous. Differs by the forewing colouration which is almost completely hyaline, slightly infuscate in A. salicifoliae (hyaline with dark patch at the base of radial cell in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.); notauli incomplete, broad, smooth, visible in posterior third of mesoscutum in A. salicifoliae (notauli complete, shallow, and partially covered by the sculpture of mesoscutum, furrow rugose in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.); median propodeal area shining, smooth in A. salicifoliae (dull rugose in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.); metasomal terga smooth without micropunctures in A. salicifoliae (posterior third of metasomal tergum II and subsequent tergum with micropunctures in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.). Galls of A. salicifoliae are subglobose, on the underside of leaves, very fragile, outer shell thin, hollow internally with thin filaments radiating from larval chamber while galls of A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov. are on buds, with outer shell hard, internal parenchyma spongious. Thin filaments radiating from the larval chamber to the outer shell in A. aliciae. We can differentiate these galls by the shape of the gall and its location (fusiform bud galls in A. aliciae and spherical leaf galls in A. salicifoliae) Host. Quercus salicifolia. Gall. Globose and fragile galls on the underside of leaves, with maximum diameter 30 mm; outer shell thin, internal space hollow with filaments radiating from the larval chamber. Larval chamber central or at the base of the gall (Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey 2010: Figs 8 G–H). Biology. The sexual generation is only known. Galls were collected in January; adults emerged in February. Distribution. Panama.

The cynipid gall wasp species of Amphibolips (Cynipidae: Cynipini) belonging to the “nassa” complex are reviewed for Mexico and Central America. Five new species are described: A. bassae Cuesta-Porta & Pujade-Villar n. sp., A. bromus Pujade-Villar & Cuesta-Porta n. sp., A. kinseyi Cuesta-Porta & Pujade-Villar n. sp., A. rulli Pujade-Villar & Cuesta-Porta n. sp., and A. turulli Pujade-Villar & Cuesta-Porta n. sp. Amphibolips quercuspomiformis (Bassett) comb. nov. is redescribed and Amphibolips malinche Nieves-Aldrey & Maldonado is proposed as a new synonym of A. hidalgoensis Pujade-Villar & Melika. The validity of A. dampfi is discussed. Diagnostic characters, distribution, host-plant relationships, and biology are provided. Also new diagnostic characters and new distribution data for earlier described species are given. Keys to adults and galls for all known “nassa” complex species from Mexico and Central America are presented.

Amphibolips dampfi Kinsey Amphibolips dampfi Kinsey, 1937: 429–430. Type material examined: HOLOTYPE. ♂ (deposited in AMNH) with the following labels: “Sierra Juarez be-tween Ixtlán de Juarez and Tepanzacoalco agalla 2.24.32/ 8700, ♂ before 4.15.32” (handwritten, white label); “ Q. ocoteaefolia Dampf coll.” (handwritten, white label); “ Amphibolips dampfi ParaHolotype ” (handwritten, red label); “ Cynipidae Amphibolips dampfi Kinsey, 1937, Nieves-Aldrey det.” (white label). Additional material. MEX-298, MEXICO, Predio La Victoria, Acocaxoithlan, Hidalgo Ex. Q. affinis, (19. iii.2014) 7–21.iv.2014: 7♂ (UB), leg. J. Pujade-Villar & D. Cibrian-Tovar. Diagnosis. This species is characterized for a deep V-shaped posteromedian depression on the mesoscutellum which is reaching the posterior margin of scutellar foveae; strong horn-like posterolateral projections slightly bent upwards (Figs 12B, 12 G–H). Area laterad to parapsidal lines rugose. Forewing (Fig. 13C) heavily infuscate with clear cross band extended from the anteromedian margin of radial cell to the posterior area, into second cubital and discoidal cells, not reaching posterior margin. This species highly resembles A. turulli n. sp. (see below) especially for the similar mesoscutellum and forewing colour pattern; but in A. dampfi the area laterad to parapsidal lines rugose (alutaceous in A. turulli n. sp.); forewings with anal and basal half of discoidal cells completely infuscate (hyaline in A. turulli n. sp.), fragile subglobose internally spongious bud galls slightly pedunculate and with small tip at apex with internal spongious tissue soft, mainly white turning into roseate around larval cell, light brown when dry (turgescent green leaf galls in A. turulli n. sp.). The gall of A. dampfi is unmistakable. It is very deformable for its lax and soft spongy internal tissue with a cotton-like appearance. It resembles A. zacatecaensis gall but in A. dampfi the internal tissue is white to rosy near the larval chamber, very soft, cotton-like (light brown and denser in A. zacatecaensis). Gall (Fig. 15E). Monolocular subglobose bud gall, up to 50 mm in diameter, with slightly elongate apex and base with smooth and fragile surface, homogenous in colour; internal spongious tissue soft, white to rosy, turning brown when dry; with cotton-like texture (the fibers leaving numerous aerial interspaces); larval chamber occupying central part of the gall, about 4–5 mm in diameter, embedded with spongious tissue. Hosts. Quercus ocoteifolia, Q. affinis. Biology. Only the sexual generation is known. Galls mature by February and March; adults emerge from February to April. Distribution. Mexico: Hidalgo and Oaxaca states. Remarks. The name of the host plant (Q. ocoteifolia), cited in the original description of this species, was erroneously written as Q. ocoteaefolia. This incorrectly spelled epithet appeared in a number of infraspecific descriptions: Quercus ocoteaeifolia f. confusa Trel., Q. laurina var. ocoteaefolia (Liebm.) Wenz., and Q. nitens var. ocoteaefolia (Liebm.) A. DC. All those forms and varieties were synonymized under Q. ocoteifolia. Comments. According to Melika et al. (2011) A. dampfi closely resembles A. palmeri Basset 1890 and may be synonymous. The type of A. palmeri (a single female) is lost, nevertheless the adult and gall descriptions seem to be consistent with this hypothesis (see A. palmeri below). The type of A. dampfi is also presumed to be lost (C. Le Beau pers. comm.)., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 12-13, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Kinsey, A. C. (1937) New Mexican Gall Wasps (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae). Revista de Entomologia, 7 (4), 428 - 471.","Melika, G., Equihua-Martinez, A., Estrada-Venegas, E. G., Cibrian-Tovar, D., Cibrian-Llanderal, V. D. & Pujade-Villar, J. (2011) New Amphibolips gallwasp species from Mexico (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Zootaxa, 3105 (1), 47 - 59. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3105.1.2"]}

Amphibolips salicifoliae Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey Amphibolips salicifoliae Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey, 2010: 55���60. Type material examined: HOLOTYPE. ♀ (deposited in MNCN), Cat n�� 2024. PANAMA, Chiriqu��, Volcan Baru 8�� 47��� 50 8��� N, 82�� 29��� 35 9��� W, 1800���2070m, Ex Q. salicifolia, (27.i.2009) ii.09, leg. E. Medianero. Paratypes: 2♂ & 2♀ with same data as the holotype (two paratypes deposited in MNCN, and two paratypes MEUP). Diagnosis. This species is characterized by the almost hyaline forewings in males and females, tarsal claws simple and notauli incomplete, short, distinct, with base of notaular groove smooth. This species closely resembles A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov. with which it shares the following character states: simple tarsal claws; mesoscutellum posteriorly not emarginated; speculum smooth and glabrous. Differs by the forewing colouration which is almost completely hyaline, slightly infuscate in A. salicifoliae (hyaline with dark patch at the base of radial cell in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.); notauli incomplete, broad, smooth, visible in posterior third of mesoscutum in A. salicifoliae (notauli complete, shallow, and partially covered by the sculpture of mesoscutum, furrow rugose in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.); median propodeal area shining, smooth in A. salicifoliae (dull rugose in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.); metasomal terga smooth without micropunctures in A. salicifoliae (posterior third of metasomal tergum II and subsequent tergum with micropunctures in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.). Galls of A. salicifoliae are subglobose, on the underside of leaves, very fragile, outer shell thin, hollow internally with thin filaments radiating from larval chamber while galls of A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov. are on buds, with outer shell hard, internal parenchyma spongious. Thin filaments radiating from the larval chamber to the outer shell in A. aliciae. We can differentiate these galls by the shape of the gall and its location (fusiform bud galls in A. aliciae and spherical leaf galls in A. salicifoliae) Host. Quercus salicifolia. Gall. Globose and fragile galls on the underside of leaves, with maximum diameter 30 mm; outer shell thin, internal space hollow with filaments radiating from the larval chamber. Larval chamber central or at the base of the gall (Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey 2010: Figs 8 G���H). Biology. The sexual generation is only known. Galls were collected in January; adults emerged in February. Distribution. Panama., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, V��ctor, Equihua-Mart��nez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibri��n-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ru��z, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, S��nchez, Imelda Virginia L��pez, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on page 32, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Medianero, E. & Nieves-Aldrey, J. L. (2010) The genus Amphibolips Reinhard (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Cynipini) in the Neotropics, with description of three new species from Panama. Zootaxa, 2360 (1), 47 - 62. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2360.1.3"]}

Amphibolips castroviejoi Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey Amphibolips castroviejoi Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey, 2010: 48���52 Type material examined: HOLOTYPE. ♀ deposited in MNCN (Cat. n�� 2022). PANAMA, Chiriqu��, Carretera de Volcancito, Boquete 8�� 43��� 23 07��� N, 82�� 27��� 19 07��� W, 1404 m, Ex Q. salicifolia, (28.i.2008) ii.08, E. Medianero leg. Paratypes: 1♂ with same data as holotype. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by heavily darkened forewings with a clear cross-band at the distal third that reaches posterior margin of forewing both in males and females, mesoscutellum subquadrate posteriorly, and metasoma predominantly black and rufo-piceous ventrally. The forewing pattern most closely resembles the species group of A. bassae n. sp., A. bromus n. sp., A. cibriani and A. fusus for the distal clear cross-band that reaches posterior margin of wing, but the forewings of A. castroviejoi are completely darkened except for the distal cross-band (proximal half of forewing is hyaline in the rest of species, except for the male of A. bassae n. sp. which is completely infuscate except for a clear spot at the distal half of radial cell). The species most closely resembles A. basssae n. sp. by the similar coarse sculpture of mesoscutum and mesoscutellum, but median sulci on the mesoscutum are absent in A. castroviejoi (present in A. bassae n. sp.), metasoma is black and rufo-piceous ventrally in A. castroviejoi (ambarine to rufous in A. bassae n. sp.). Galls of A. castroviejoi are differ from all other known galls; they are large (on average 54 x 43 mm), irregularly spherical or globose, elongated at the base, with a thick peduncle, without apical tip, and with a smooth, mottled surface. Gall. A globose bud gall, 45���58 mm in diameter, with short elongation at the base forming a thick peduncle. Light green and mottled when mature, turning light brown when dry. Outer shell thin, hard. Internal parenchyma soft and spongious. Central larval chamber with a hard shell, 5���6 mm in diameter. A picture of the gall is given in Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey (2010: Figs 8 A���C). Host. Quercus salicifolia. Biology. Only the sexual generation is known. Galls were collected in January; adults emerged in February. Distribution. Panama., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, V��ctor, Equihua-Mart��nez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibri��n-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ru��z, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, S��nchez, Imelda Virginia L��pez, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on page 11, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Medianero, E. & Nieves-Aldrey, J. L. (2010) The genus Amphibolips Reinhard (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Cynipini) in the Neotropics, with description of three new species from Panama. Zootaxa, 2360 (1), 47 - 62. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2360.1.3"]}

Amphibolips jaliscensis Nieves-Aldrey & Pascual Amphibolips jaliscensis Nieves-Aldrey & Pascual, 2012. In Nieves-Aldrey et al., 2012: 11–14. Type material examined. HOLOTYPE. ♀ deposited in MNCN (Cat. nº 2247; Code: 89200). MEXICO, Jalisco, Nevado de Colima, 19º 37’ 408” N, 103º 33’ 216” W, 2048 m; Ex Quercus aff. candicans, (31.iii.2009) iv.2009, leg. E. Pascual Paratype (deposited in MNCN): 1♂ with the same data as the holotype (Code: 89201). Additional material. “ MEX260, MEXICO, Mexico, San Juan Coajomulco; Ex Q. laurina Bonpl., (16.iv.2014) 8.v.2014: 1♂ (UB), leg. R. D. García-Martiñón ”. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by lightly infuscate forewings with anterior infuscate band in females (males with completely infuscate forewings with a deeper infuscate anterior band), radial cell with a clear area on distal third in both males and females; lateral margin of eye smooth. Most closely resembles A. michoacaensis but scutellar foveae transversally carinate, with fine median carina not reaching anterior margin (smooth foveae with coarse median carina reaching anterior margin in A. michoacaensis); scutellar posteromedian depression reaching margin of metascutellum (depression interrupted before posterior margin by strong transversal carina in A. michoacaensis) (Figs 5D, 11 E–F; 12C–D). This species is also morphologically close to A. nevadensis by the forewing pattern and smooth lateral margin of eye, but can be differentiated in females by F1 1.4x as long as F2 (1.6x longer in A. nevadensis), posterior band of micropunctures on metasoma tergum II dorsally narrower, covering posterior 1/3 of tergum laterally and reduced to posterior 1/5 dorsally (uniform in posterior 1/ 3 in A. nevadensis); males scutellar median depression rugate as rest of mesoscutellum (median depression with few rugae, mostly smooth in A. nevadensis). Galls of A. jaliscensis and A. michoacaensis are subglobose, outer shell thin and rather fragile with uniform colouration (pale green in A. jaliscensis and whitish in A. michoacaensis), with spongious parenchyma internally, the gall turning brown when dry. Galls of A. nevadensis are different for its distinct apical tip. Amphibolips jaliscensis gall is similar to other species with large globular shape, without mottled surface; it is not differentiable from A. hidalgoensis and A. michoacaensis, but differs from A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov., A. oaxacae, A. tarasco, A. kinseyi n. sp. and A. bassae n. sp. in having a deformable surface at finger pressure because the parenchyma relatively soft in A. hidalgoensis, A. jaliscensis and A. michoacaensis. Gall. Spherical bud galls, maximum diameter 43–54 mm; outer shell thin, firm, surface smooth with uniform pale green colour turning into brown when dry; internal tissue soft and spongious, with central larval chamber around 5 mm (Nieves-Aldrey et al. 2012: Figs 19A–B). Hosts. Quercus aff. calophylla (= Q. aff. candicans), Q. laurina. Biology. The sexual generation is only known. The mature galls were collected in late March; adults emerged in April and May. Distribution. Mexico: Jalisco and Mexico states. Remarks. Nieves-Aldrey et al. (2012) characterized this species mainly by its clear, less infuscate area on apical third of radial cell of the forewing. This character has also been observed in A. hidalgoensis and A. michoacaensis, thus it is no longer considered as an exclusive diagnostic character for A. jaliscensis. We provide alternative characters to determine A. jaliscensis (see diagnosis). This species is difficult to differentiate from A. michoacaensis, except for two scutellar characters. This fact leads us to suspect that they might be the same species. The transversal carinae of the scutellar foveae are variable in length, number and impression between specimens of this genus. The currently known specimens of these two species appear to be consistent with regards to possession of the characters proposed in this study to differentiate them, albeit more material is needed to assess the degree of intraspecific variability, and to confirm which are reliable diagnostic characters., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on page 16, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Nieves-Aldrey, J. L., Pascual, E., Maldonado-Lopez, Y., Medianero, E. & Oyama, K. (2012) Revision of the Amphibolips species of Mexico excluding the \" niger complex \" Kinsey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), with description of seven new species. Zootaxa, 3545 (1), 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3545.1.1"]}

Amphibolips quercuspomiformis (Bassett) comb. nov. Cynips q. pomiformis Bassett, 1881: 74. Andricus (Andricus) pomiformis (Bassett) Ashmead, 1885: 295 Callirliytis rossi Kieffer, 1903: 84. Synonymy in Weld, 1951: 652 Callirhytis maculipeunis Kieffer, 1904: 131. Synonymized by Kinsey, 1922: 36 Andricus yosemite Beutenmuller, 1911: 211. Synonymy in Weld, 1951: 652 Callirhytis pomiformis (Bassett) Mayr, 1902: 289 Andricus pomiformis var maculipennis (Kieffer) in Kinsey, 1922: 36 Callirhytis quercuspomiformis (Bassett), Weld, 1951: 652 Type material. Asexual females. Deposited in AMNH: 4 pins (insects in a good condition); 3 pins with white redletter label “ Type ”, 1 pin with red label “ Type ”, all with printed labels “ California ”, “ Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. Dept. Invert. Zool. No. 24651.”; one pin with Bass. handwritten label “ Andricus pomiformis B. Type ”. Material examined. 7ǒ (deposited in UB) with the following label: “MEX-453, MEXICO, Ejido Uruapan, Ensenada, Baja California Q. agrifolia, (19.x.2018) 1–10.xi.18, 17ǒ (7ǒ UB), leg. S. Ordaz Silva & I. V. López Sán-chez”; same data, extraction 19.x.2018: 20ǒ. Additional material. Deposited in UB with the following labels: “P037, MEXICO, Cerro del Cubilete, Silao, Guanajuato, only galls without data, leg. JP-V, A. Equihua & E. Estrada”. Sexual females and males. We were unable to get specimens of the sexual generation and thus we follow the description of adults and galls given by Lyon (1959). Diagnosis. The asexual female of this species is characterized by a mesoscutum with sparse long white setae and discontinuous transversal carinate sculpture in anterior half. Most closely resembles A. salicifoliae for its glabrous shining, smooth speculum, simple tarsal claws, posterior scutellar depression absent, and forewing almost hyaline except for the infuscate margins of R1 and 2r veins. Amphibolips quercuspomiformis comb. nov. differs from A. salicifoliae by its colouration (black head, mesosoma and metasoma in dorsal view, but rufous metasoma laterally in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov. while entirely brownish-rufous in A. salicifoliae; head faintly rugate dorsally and striae radiating from clypeus on lower face (coarsely rugate in A. salicifoliae); notauli shallow and entirely rugate (posteriorly smooth in A. salicifoliae) and ventral spine of hypopygium 2.2x as long as broad (0.8x in A. salicifoilae). Forewing colour pattern also resembles those of A. aliciae and A. kinseyi n. sp. but can be differenti-ated for tarsal claws with basal lobe (simple in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.); speculum sculptured in A. aliciae and A. kinseyi n. sp. (smooth and glabrous in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.), a less infuscate basal margin of radial cell (extended to basal third of radial cell in A. aliciae and A. kinseyi n. sp.); notauli deep and emarginate dorsally and with transverse carinae along sulci in A. aliciae and A. kinseyi n. sp. Galls of A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov. are similar to other species with galls that have a large globular shape and without a mottled surface; nevertheless, they are differentiable from all of these in colour (surface yellowish to orange-magenta when mature, turning to brownish orange when dry) and by being multilocular; it is the only Amphibolips multilocular gall so far known in the studied area. In USA (Arizona), A. ruginosus (Bassett, 1890) galls are also multilocular, but in this case, the larval chambers are not detachable from the host tissue (easily detachable in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.), 2.5 mm in diameter (longer in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.) with the surface rough and blackened and deeply and irregularly fissured (never in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.); adults with hyaline wings and metasoma yellowish brown (with a dark patch next to the basal part of radial cell and metasoma brownish-rufous in A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov.). Redescription. (Figs 7 A–7F, 8A–D). Asexual female. Body length: 3.4–3.6 mm. (N=5) Colour. Head black, except chestnut brown maxillary and labial palpi; antennae light brown, mesosoma black; forelegs light brown and ambarine distally, median and hind legs darker basally and progressively lighter on distal end; coxae black, femora chestnut to light brown, tibiae and tarsi light brown; metasoma dorsally black with rufous stripes around margin of metasomal terga II and III, brownish-rufous on lateral view. Head (Figs 7 B–7D) quadrangular in anterior view, frons dull rugose, with sparse short white setae, 2.4x as broad as long from above, 1.4x as broad as high in anterior view and as broad as mesosoma; lower face alutaceous with striae radiating from clypeus, with denser white setae and narrow elevated rugose median area. Gena dull rugose, slightly broadened behind eye, hardly visible in anterior view behind eye, as broad as cross diameter of eye; malar space striate, smooth on lower margin of eye; height of eye 2.0x as long as length of malar space. POL 1.4x as long as OOL; diameter of lateral ocellus equal to LOL; ocelli ovate. Transfacial distance 1.2x as broad as height of eye; diameter of antennal torulus 1.7x as long as distance between toruli, distance between torulus and inner margin of eye 1.6x as long as diameter of torulus. Clypeus smooth, ventrally projected and slightly sinuate, with median incision; anterior tentorial pits deep, epistomal sulcus inconspicuous, clypeo-pleurostomal line distinct. Frons, vertex, interocellar area and occiput uniformly dull rugose. Occiput with conspicuous carina dorsally. Labial palpus 3-segmented, maxillary palpus 5-segmented. Antenna (Fig. 8B) with 12 flagellomeres; slightly longer than head+mesosoma, scape 2.2x as long as pedicel; pedicel subglobose, slightly longer than broad; F1 equal to scape+pedicel and 1.3x as long as F2; F2 as long as F3; F3 nearly equal in length to F4, subsequent flagellomeres shorter, F12 1.8x as long as F11; placodeal sensilla visible on F4–F12, absent on F1–F3. Mesosoma (Figs 7C, 7E) only slightly longer than high. Pronotum smooth dorsally, with numerous faint irregular rugae laterally. Mesoscutum dull rugose, with transversal interrupted carinae in anterior half; dull rugose in posterior half; subequal, nearly as long as broad in dorsal view (largest width measured across mesoscutum on the level of tegulae base). Notauli distinct under dull rugose sculpture; anterior parallel lines extending to anterior third of mesoscutum, slightly elevated, mesoscutum impressed along both sides of lines; parapsidal lines distinct, originating from posterior margin and extending to nearly half length of mesoscutum; median mesoscutal line absent; parascutal carina short, extending to level of tegula only. Mesoscutellum 0.4x as long as mesoscutum, uniformly dull rugose, quadrangular, 1.4x as broad as long, slightly overhanging metanotum; scutellar foveae triangular, shallow, smooth, with distinct complete elevated narrow median carina; lateral sides of foveae with strong narrow carinae, separating them from dorsoaxillar area. Mesoscutellum without posteromedian depression. Mesopleuron, except speculum, uniformly dull rugose; speculum shiny, smooth, dorsal third glabrous and sparsely pubescent ventrally, ventral rugae orientated into transverse faint subparallel striae. Mesopleural triangle rugose; dorsoaxillar area with faint rugae; lateral axillar area and axillula coriaceous, with few short, white setae; subaxillular bar smooth, shining, with parallel sides, its height less than height of metanotal trough, most posterior part extending to half height of mesoscutellum; postalar process long, with parallel striae; metapleural sulcus hidden under dull rugose sculpture. Metascutellum uniformly coriaceous, metanotal trough coriaceous, with dense white setae; ventral impressed area smooth, slightly shorter than height of metascutellum; central propodeal area faintly rugate; lateral propodeal carinae strong, high, converge in anterior margin, slightly curved outwards medially; lateral propodeal area with faint rugae and dense white setae; nucha short, smooth. Legs (Figs 7A, 8 C–D) with dense short white setae; tarsal claws simple. Forewing (Fig. 8A) longer than body, mostly hyaline, with short dense cilia on margin, heavy dark stripe on basal part of radial cell, veins dark brown, Rs+M vein faintly pigmentated; radial cell narrow, long, opened on margin, 3.5 times longer than broad; R1 and Rs nearly reaching wing margin; areolet small, triangular, closed but posterior margin indistinct; Rs+M reaching basalis at its half height. Metasoma (Figs 7A, 7F) as long as head+mesosoma, slightly longer than high in lateral view; 2nd metasomal tergum occupying nearly 4/5 of metasoma length, smooth, shining, with sparse setae laterally; posterior third conspicuously finely punctate laterally, posterior margin with a very narrow smooth band, without punctures; all subsequent terga dorsally and laterally uniformly and entirely micropunctate, with a narrow smooth band posteriorly on each tergum. Ventral spine of hypopygium robust, short, needle-like, prominent part 2.2x as long as broad, with two rows of white setae each side, extending beyond apex of spine. Sexual female. Similar to the asexual females, but differs in the following characters: antenna with 11–12 flagellomeres; body uniformly yellowish-brown; all the legs yellowish-brown; mesoscutum and mesoscutellum less pubescent; metasomal terga sometimes smooth, without micropunctures, body length 2.3–3.1 mm. Male. Similar to the sexual females except that they are smaller; antenna with 13 flagellomeres; body reddish-brown, except for the two basal terga which are yellowish. Mesoscutum only sparsely pubescent. Body length 2.1–2.6 mm. Gall. Asexual galls (Figs 16 A–D). A large multilocular subglobose bud gall, up to 40 mm in diameter. The body of the gall is spherical (rarely flattened or ovate), with greatest diameter near the middle of the gall; surface sometimes with low tubercles radiating more or less from the slightly pointed tip of the gall. The gall is hard-walled, yellowish to rufous-magenta when mature and turning to brownish orange when dry, with smooth and naked surface; spongious internally, with hard filaments connecting the larval chambers with the base of the gall; up to 50 hardwalled larval chambers clustered in the center of the gall, easily separable from the firm; sometimes resembling the inquiline larval chambers; each larval chamber around 2.0–4.0 mm in diameter. Sexual galls. A toadstool-shaped gall arising singly, or occasionally in groups of two or three from the lamina of the underside of the leaves. Galls are tinged with rose or pink when young, although most are light-green in colour. Galls are monolocular, with the single cell occupying the space below the flared top of the gall. The elongated stem of the gall is solid. Hosts. Quercus agrifolia, Q. wislizenii, for both generations. Biology. Alternate sexual and asexual generations are known (Lyon 1959). Sexual galls appear from February to early April, mature in early May; adults emerged from mid-May to the first week of June. Asexual galls mature in October; adults emerged in November. Distribution. USA (California) and México (Baja California and Guanajuato states). Remarks. Kinsey (1922) named this species as Andricus pomiformis and described five varieties, considering Callirhytis maculipennis Kieffer 1904 one of them: A. pomiformis var descansonis (Kinsey 1922), A. pomiformis distinctus (Kinsey 1922), A. pomiformis pomiformis (Basset, 1881), A. pomiformis var maculipennis (Kieffer) and A. quercuspomiformis provincialis (Kinsey 1922). Later, Weld (1951), following Mayr’s work (1902), transferred this species to the genus Callirhytis and recognised only three of Kinsey’s varieties (var. descansonis, var distincta and var. provincialis). Later, Melika & Abrahamson (2002) concluded that this species belongs to the genus Amphibolips but did not formalize the nomenclatorial act for species transfer. Herein this nomenclatorial act is completed. According to Kinsey (1922), the morphological differences of these varieties included the notauli (from mostly indistinguishable within the mesosomal sculpture with notaular furrow rugose, to distinct with notaular furrow smooth posteriorly, and to distinct but shallow and furrow rugose); mesosoma with median sulci (absent except in var. distinctus); anterior parallel lines on the mesosoma (mostly continuous to discontinuous); lateral lines of the mesosoma (from prominent to fine and narrow); scutellar foveae (divided by a rugose and elevated area in all, or with median area also rugose but low); scutellar posteromedian depression (from absent to present, but variable in depth, deepest in var. provincialis); speculum (from glabrous and smooth to not completely smooth, with scattered punctuations and sometimes setae); areolet ranging from small to large, prolonged on the cubitus; forewing infuscation around the base of radial cell; and gall surface (present several projections on the surface, each ending in a short filament in var. distinctus and surface smooth and naked in the rest). Several characters are roughly differentiable or shared between the varieties such as the anterior parallel lines, the speculum, but others such as the median carina or the posteromedian depression of the mesoscutellum may be unique to a variety. Among the varieties, the most deviant is var. distinctus based on the distinct notauli, median sulci visible and the surface of the galls with projections. However, Kinsey (1922) comments that some var. distinctus specimens share characters of var. maculipennis (as well as var. provincialis had specimens similar to var. maculipennis). Similarly, the new material from Baja California present distinct notauli, smooth notaular furrow posteriorly as in var. distinctus, but the median sulci and scutellar posteromedian depression are absent, and the speculum is completely smooth and glabrous. The distribu-tion of the varieties is limited to California (USA) and range from the central to southern regions. All varieties have overlapping, or nearly so, distributions with at least another variety. The range of var. maculipennis includes localities from the range of var. descansonis, var. distinctus and var. provincialis, which occur almost exclusively in the southern regions. The variety pomiformis is limited to central California (San Francisco, Mount Diablo, Gilroy, and Salinas) and the closest known varieties are var. maculipennis and var. distictus (Yosemite Park and Merced Falls). Most of these characters also follow a continuous variation, and the distributions overlap in the southern regions for all, except var. pomiformis. Thus, there are not conspicuous character states to support these varieties as independent entities. Also, the host plant is Q. agrifolia in three of the varieties and Q. wislizenii in var. provincialis and var. distinctus. Both oaks are closely related and often form hybrids (Brophy & Parnell 1974). We consider all these varieties as intraspecific variations of Amphibolips quercuspomiformis comb. nov.

Amphibolips cibriani Pujade-Villar Amphibolips cibriani Pujade-Villar, 2018; In Pujade-Villar et al., 2018: 151–158. Type material examined. HOLOTYPE. ♀ (deposited in JP-V col., UB) with the following labels: “MEX-316, Santa Fe (Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de México), 19° 21’ 0.99” N, 99°16’ 27.02” W ” (white label), “ Q. crassipes, 2630 msnm., (25. iv.2017) 10–20.v.2017 ”, col. DCT-2906” (white label); “ Holotype Amphibolips cibriani Pujade-Villar n. sp., desig. JP-V 2018 ” (red label). Paratypes: 4ǒ with the same data as the holotype (UB). Additional material. Deposited in UB: (4ǒ) with the same data as the holotype, adults were cut out from the galls; “MEX 299, MEXICO, Santa Fe, Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de México, 19° 21’ 0.99” N, 99°16’ 27.02” W, (10. vii.2014) only galls (UB), Ex Q. crassipes, leg. D. Cibrian ”. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by incomplete notauli and rounded mesoscutellum with posterolateral projections not pointing upwards (Fig. 11A); antenna black in the first half and conspicuously lighter in distal half; forewing infuscate, with distal half infuscate and a hyaline cross band at distal third of radial cell reaching posterior margin of wing. Closely resembles A. bassae n. sp. and A. bromus n. sp. (see Diagnosis above in the corresponding species). The gall also differs from all other known galls from Mexico and Central America (see below). Gall. (Figs 14 I–K) A subglobose bud gall, approximately 20 mm in diameter. Outer shell lignified and hard. Surface rugulose, uniformly light brown, with short apical tip and peduncle. The gall is monolocular, with a spongy internal tissue, filling the entire gall, with central rounded larval cell. Host. Quercus crassipes. Biology. Only females are known. The galls were collected in April; adults emerged in May. Distribution. Mexico: Ciudad de México State., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Pujade-Villar, J., Barrera-Ruiz, U. M. & Cuesta-Porta, V. (2018) Description of Amphibolips cibriani Pujade-Villar n. sp. from Mexico (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Cynipini). Dugesiana, 25 (2), 151 - 158."]}

Amphibolips palmeri Basset species dubia Amphibolips palmeri Basset, 1890: 86. The type material is presumably lost (Buffington pers. com.). This species was described from a single specimen extracted from a gall collected from an unidentified Quercus species by Basset (1890). According to the author, the gall was donated by Mr. B. Pickman Mann and had the following label: “Summit of Sierra Madre, Chihuahua, México. Winter 1885–86, Dr. Edward Palmer”. Beutenmüller (1909) in his revision of the Amphibolips of North America broadened the distribution of this species to Guadalajara (Jalisco, México) for a gall deposited in the American Museum of Natural History, but did not add any new information to the description of the species. Amphibolips palmeri was not mentioned in Kinsey (1937) paper on Amphibolips of México. In the latest studies on Amphibolips (Melika et al. 2011; Nieves-Aldrey et al. 2012) as well as in this study, the type material of the species was not found. We provide the original description given Basset (1890) below: “Gallfly – Female. Entire body black. Head: face unevenly wrinkled, vertex and thorax deeply and irregularly wrinkled. Antennae black, very short, 13-jointed, first joint heavy, second joint short, third joint one-half longer than the first and second together, fourth joint one half as long as the third, remaining joints short, last joint a little longer than the twelfth. Mesothorax deeply and irregularly wrinkled with two obscure parallel lines and a line at the base of each wing. Parapsidal grooves faint and scarcely interrupt the rugosity of the surface. Mesoscutellum very coarsely wrinkled and conspicuously broader in the middle than on the anterior side, truncate and emarginate posteriorly; foveae large, rugose with a low irregular line separating them and a high ridge bounding them at the sides, the whole polished and shining. Abdomen black, second segment covering one-half of the whole, anterior half smooth and shining and with a few scattered hairs. The posterior half and the visible parts of the other segments distinctly reticulated or punctate, except a narrow-polished band on the margin of each. Legs black, shining with a few scattered hairs. Wings dark, smoky brown, with a very dark brown cloud covering the areolet and the lower half of the radial area; beyond this and extending across the radial area to almost the posterior margin is a light colourless area and the anterior margin from the dark, broad, first cross-vein to a short distance beyond the second cross-vein is of the same light colour; tip of wing beyond the pale area, dark smoky brown as below this pale area. Areolet very small, but well defined. Radial area open, large and broad. Length 6.5 mm.” Concerning to the gall, it is a large spherical spongious bud gall. Light yellowish brown; the outer shell thin but firm. Internally soft spongious tissue. Larval chamber round embedded in the spongious tissue. Diameter: 35 to 70 mm. Remarks. According to Melika et al. (2011), this species closely resembles A. dampfi and might well be synonymous. The type (female) of A. palmeri is lost, nevertheless the adults and galls descriptions are consistent. For the moment, this species is considered as species dubia until the type material appears, or new data can be examined., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 23-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Beutenmuller, W. (1909) The species of Amphibolips and their galls. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 26, 47 - 66.","Kinsey, A. C. (1937) New Mexican Gall Wasps (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae). Revista de Entomologia, 7 (4), 428 - 471.","Melika, G., Equihua-Martinez, A., Estrada-Venegas, E. G., Cibrian-Tovar, D., Cibrian-Llanderal, V. D. & Pujade-Villar, J. (2011) New Amphibolips gallwasp species from Mexico (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Zootaxa, 3105 (1), 47 - 59. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3105.1.2","Nieves-Aldrey, J. L., Pascual, E., Maldonado-Lopez, Y., Medianero, E. & Oyama, K. (2012) Revision of the Amphibolips species of Mexico excluding the \" niger complex \" Kinsey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), with description of seven new species. Zootaxa, 3545 (1), 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3545.1.1"]}

Amphibolips bassae Cuesta-Porta & Pujade-Villar n. sp. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: B54EB2A5-C4E0-4B7A-A548-03DD111317F2 Type material. HOLOTYPE ♀ (deposited in UB) with the following labels: “ MEXICO, Juárez, Puebla ” (white label), “ Q. crassifolia, (26.v.2013) vi.2013, leg. Alondra ” (white label), Holotype Amphibolips bassae Cuesta-Porta & JP-V n. sp., desig. Cuesta-Porta, 2020” (red label). Paratypes: 1♂ with the same data as the holotype. Etymology. Named in honor of Dolors Bassa i Coll. Diagnosis. The new species is characterized by its forewing colouration, infuscate on distal half with a hyaline cross band covering the whole width of wing on the distal third in females (males with completely infuscate forewings except for a clear area distally on the first costal cell, under margin with radial cell); mesoscutellum slightly broader than long with posterolateral pointed projections and projecting upwards; scutellar fovea are separated by a strong median carina; the antenna black, sometimes lighter distally. Most closely resembles A. bromus n. sp. and A. cibriani. Amphibolips bassae n. sp. and A. cibriani have incomplete notauli and the mesoscutellum broader than long, but the posterolateral projections of mesoscutellum is pointed upwards in the new species and rounded in A. cibriani; antenna almost uniformly chestnut black in the new species and basally black and light brown distally in A. cibriani; the clypeus and mandibles are uniformly chestnut brown in A. bassae n. sp., while in A. cibriani the clypeus is chestnut brown and mandibles are rufous. Also, the new species differs from A. bromus n. sp. by the incomplete notauli and mesoscutellum broader than long. Galls of the new species are completely different from all mentioned species; it is globular, hard, not squeezable by finger pressure, up to 40 mm of diameter. The surface is olive green when mature and turning brownish green when dry, never mottled. Description. (Figs 1 A–1G). Sexual female. Body length: 5 mm (N=1) Colour. Head black; antennae black on basal half and chestnut brown distally; mesosoma black; legs chestnut brown, except ambarine tarsi; metasoma ambarine. Head (Figs 1 C–1D) ovate in anterior view, upper face coarsely dull rugose, almost glabrous, 2.6x as broad as long from above, 1.2x as broad as high in anterior view and slightly narrower than mesosoma; lower face rugose with alutaceous interspaces, uniformly sparsely pubescent with white setae. Gena rugose with alutaceous interspaces, broadened behind eye, visible behind eyes in anterior view, 1.3x as broad as cross diameter of eye; malar space faintly rugate and dull; height of eye 1.6 times as long as length of malar space. POL subequal to OOL; diameter of lateral ocellus 2.5–2.8x larger than LOL; ocelli round. Transfacial distance 1.4 times as broad as height of eye; diameter of antennal torulus 3x longer than distance between toruli, distance between torulus and inner margin of eye 1.3 times as long as diameter of torulus. Clypeus alutaceous, ventrally emarginate, with median incision; anterior tentorial pits deep, epistomal sulcus and clypeo-pleurostomal lines obscured, slightly discernible. Frons, vertex, interocellar area and occiput uniformly coarsely rugose. Occiput with dorsal faint carina. Labial palpus 3-segmented, maxillary palpus 5-segmented. Antenna (Fig. 1B) with 11 flagellomeres; slightly longer than mesosoma+head; scape 2.6x as long as pedicel; pedicel subglobose, slightly broader than long; F1 subequal to scape+pedicel and 1.3x as long as F2; F2 slightly longer than F3; F3 nearly equal to F4, subsequent flagellomeres shorter, F11 2.0x as long as F10; F11 strongly divided with incomplete sulci, F11 2.0x as long as broad after the incomplete sulci, placodeal sensilla visible on F5–F11, absent on F1–F4. Mesosoma (Figs 1 E–1F) only slightly longer than high. Pronotal plate smooth dorsally, with numerous irregular rugae laterally. Mesoscutum uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces; round, as long as broad in dorsal view (largest width measured across mesoscutum on the level of tegulae base). Notauli incomplete, lost in rugose sculpture on anterior half, notaular furrow with same sculpture as rest of mesoscutum; anterior parallel lines hardly visible through sculpture, not elevate, alutaceous-coriaceous, extending to almost half of mesoscutum; parapsidal lines distinct, originating away from posterior margin and extending to nearly half length of mesoscutum, slightly elevated; median mesoscutal sulcus present, shiny with transversal rugate; parascutal carina short, extending to level of tegula only. Mesoscutellum 0.5x as long as mesoscutum, 0.8x as long as broad, coarsely dull rugose, round, as broad as long, overhanging metanotum; marginate laterally, scutellar foveae round, deep, conspicuous median carina, foveae shiny smooth with faint transversal carinae connected to median carina, lateral sides of foveae with strong narrow carinae, separating them from dorsoaxillar area, posteriorly margined by V-shaped carina pointing to posterior depression. Mesoscutellum with posteromedian depression reaching posterior margin of mesoscutellum, margined laterally by strong carinae, depression rugate. Mesopleuron uniformly rugose with alutaceous interspaces and sparsely pubescent, some rugae orientated into transverse subparallel striae. Mesopleural triangle rugose and shiny; dorsal axillar area rugate; lateral axillar area and axillula faintly rugate, with few short, white setae; subaxillular bar smooth, shiny, with parallel sides, its height less than height of metanotal trough, most posterior part extending to half height of mesoscutellum; postalar process long, with parallel striae; metapleural sulcus hidden in dull rugose sculpture. Metascutellum uniformly faintly rugate-coriaceous, metanotal trough faintly shiny rugose, with dense white setae; ventral impressed area smooth, slightly shorter than height of metascutellum; central propodeal area rugate, dull; lateral propodeal carinae visible, partially covered by sculpture, subparallel, slightly curved outwards medially; lateral propodeal area with irregular strong wrinkles and dense white setae; nucha short, with irregular wrinkles. Legs with sparse short white setae; tarsal claws with basal lobe. Forewing (Fig. 1A) longer than body, hyaline on basal half, with basal cell slightly infuscate around margins; short dense cilia on margin; distal half infuscate with clear longitudinal stripe on distal third extended posteriorly covering distal third of radial cell, medial part of second costal cell and distal part of discoidal cell; veins dark brown; radial cell narrow, heavily infuscate basally, long, opened on margin, 3 times longer than broad; R1 nearly reaching wing margin; areolet small, visible, triangular, closed; Rs+M reaching basalis at its half height. Metasoma (Fig. 1G) almost as long as head+mesosoma, 1.2x as long as high in lateral view; 2nd metasomal tergum slightly surpassing half of length of metasoma, smooth, dull, with short sparse setae laterally; posterior third conspicuously finely punctate dorsally and laterally, posterior margin with a very narrow smooth band, without punctures; all subsequent terga dorsally and laterally uniformly and entirely micropunctate, with a narrow smooth band posteriorly on each tergum. Ventral spine of hypopygium robust, short, needle-like, prominent part 3.3x as long as broad, with two rows of white setae each side, extending beyond apex of spine. Male (Figs 2 A–2F). Differs from female as follows: antennae with 13 flagellomeres (Fig. 2B), entirely black; legs black except tarsi chestnut brown; forewings completely infuscate (Fig. 2F), first costal cell with clear area on distal half, basal margin of radial cell more infuscate, hyaline patch on middle third of Rs vein, covering part of radial and costal II cell; transfacial distance 1.2x as long as height of eye, diameter of toruli 2.5x as long as distance from torulus to lateral margin of eye, diameter of torulus 4.5x as long as distance between toruli. Mesoscutum coarsely rugose, notauli and median carina almost inconspicuous, rugose (Fig. 2D). Mesoscutellum coarsely rugose, 1.1x longer than broad; scutellar foveae round, shiny and rugose (Fig. 2C). Metasoma 0.9x as long as mesosoma and 1.6x as long as high (Fig. 2A). Length 5 mm (N=1) Gall (Figs 16 E–G). A rather small, subglobose bud gall, around 40 mm in diameter; slightly narrower at base around the connection with the branch. The gall is thick-walled, with lignified parenchyma, olive green when mature and turn light brown when dry, with smooth and naked surface; hard spongious parenchyma internally with central ovate, hard-walled larval chamber, with largest length of 5.0– 6.5 mm. Host. Quercus crassifolia. Biology. Only the sexual generation is known. The mature gall was collected in May; adults emerged in June. Distribution. Mexico: Puebla State., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 5-8, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340

Amphibolips castroviejoi Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey Amphibolips castroviejoi Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey, 2010: 48–52 Type material examined: HOLOTYPE. ♀ deposited in MNCN (Cat. nº 2022). PANAMA, Chiriquí, Carretera de Volcancito, Boquete 8º 43’ 23 07” N, 82º 27’ 19 07” W, 1404 m, Ex Q. salicifolia, (28.i.2008) ii.08, E. Medianero leg. Paratypes: 1♂ with same data as holotype. Diagnosis. This species is characterized by heavily darkened forewings with a clear cross-band at the distal third that reaches posterior margin of forewing both in males and females, mesoscutellum subquadrate posteriorly, and metasoma predominantly black and rufo-piceous ventrally. The forewing pattern most closely resembles the species group of A. bassae n. sp., A. bromus n. sp., A. cibriani and A. fusus for the distal clear cross-band that reaches posterior margin of wing, but the forewings of A. castroviejoi are completely darkened except for the distal cross-band (proximal half of forewing is hyaline in the rest of species, except for the male of A. bassae n. sp. which is completely infuscate except for a clear spot at the distal half of radial cell). The species most closely resembles A. basssae n. sp. by the similar coarse sculpture of mesoscutum and mesoscutellum, but median sulci on the mesoscutum are absent in A. castroviejoi (present in A. bassae n. sp.), metasoma is black and rufo-piceous ventrally in A. castroviejoi (ambarine to rufous in A. bassae n. sp.). Galls of A. castroviejoi are differ from all other known galls; they are large (on average 54 x 43 mm), irregularly spherical or globose, elongated at the base, with a thick peduncle, without apical tip, and with a smooth, mottled surface. Gall. A globose bud gall, 45–58 mm in diameter, with short elongation at the base forming a thick peduncle. Light green and mottled when mature, turning light brown when dry. Outer shell thin, hard. Internal parenchyma soft and spongious. Central larval chamber with a hard shell, 5–6 mm in diameter. A picture of the gall is given in Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey (2010: Figs 8 A–C). Host. Quercus salicifolia. Biology. Only the sexual generation is known. Galls were collected in January; adults emerged in February. Distribution. Panama.

Amphibolips hidalgoensis Pujade-Villar & Melika Amphibolips hidalgoensis Pujade-Villar & Melika, 2011. In Melika et al., 2011: 53–56. Amphibolips malinche Nieves-Aldrey & Maldonado, 2012. In Nieves-Aldrey et al., 2012: 16–18. n. syn. Type material examined of A. hidalgoensis: HOLOTYPE. ǒ (deposited in JP-V col, UB) with the following la-bels: MEXICO, “Acoxachitlan, Barrio de Tlacpac, Hidalgo state, Mexico (08.vi.2010) 8–15.vi.2010. Q. crassifolia, leg J.Pujade-Villar” (white label), “ Holotype Amphibolips hidalgoensis Pujade-Villar & Melika desig. JP-V 2011” (red label); Paratypes (deposited in JP-V col, UB): 16ǒ with the same data as the holotype; 5♀, MEXICO, San Mar-cos, Tlaxcala, (3.vi.2010) 3–10.vi.2010, Ex Q. crassipes, leg. J.Pujade-Villar; 4ǒ, MEXICO, Los Romeros, Hidalgo, (3.vi.2010), 3–10.vi.2010; Ex Q. candicans, leg J. Pujade-Villar; 4ǒ, Huasca, Hidalgo, (08.vi.2010) 8–15.vi.2010, Ex Q. candicans; Type material examined of A. malinche: HOLOTYPE. ♀ (deposited in MNCN), Cat. nº 2248. “ MEXICO, Tlaxcala, La Malinche, 19º 12’ 29 49” N, 98º 0’ 44 47” W, 2800 m; ex gall Q. mexicana, (16.v.2006) 30.v.2006, leg. E. Pascual”; Paratype: 1♀ with the same data as holotype. Additional material. Material deposited in UB with the following labels: (MEX-273, MEX-274, MEX-275, MEX-279 & MEX-280) “Parque Nacional Zoquiapan y Anexas, 2138792.32N, 535424.37W, 3046 masl, Ixtapaluca, México (México), Ex Q. crassipes, (30.v.2012) vi–viii.2012: 18ŏ (UB), leg. E. Estrada & A. Equihua ”; “MEX-283, MEXICO, Los Romeros (2411 masl), Santiago Tulantepec de Lugo Guerrero, Hidalgo, (03.vi.2010) 17.vii.2010: 1ŏ (UB), Ex Q. mexicana, leg. E. Estrada & A. Equihua ”; “MEX-284, MEXICO, Canalejas, Estado de Mexico, Ex Q. crassipes, (iii.2002) iv.2002: 1ŏ (UB), leg. Efrain Tovar; “MEX-290, MEXICO, Fray Francisco (2210 masl), Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, Ex Q. crassifolia, (10.vi.2010) 23.vi.2010: 7ŏ (UB), leg. E. Estrada & A. Equihua ”; “MEX-292, MEXICO, San Marcos (573138.99 E, 2137717.75 N; 2342 masl), Papalotla de Xicohténcatl, Tlaxcala, Ex Q. crassipes, (03.vi.2010) 04.vii.2010: 4ŏ (UB), leg. E. Estrada & A. Equihua ”; “MEX-293, MEXICO, Huasca, Hidalgo, Ex Q. calophylla, (08.vi.2010) 15–30.vi.2010: 2ŏ (UB), leg. J. Pujade-Villar ”; “MEX-296, MEXICO, Barrio Tlacpac, Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, Ex Q. crassifolia, (08.vi.2010) 13.vii.2010: 11ŏ (UB), leg. E. Estrada & A. Equihua ”; “MEX-334, MEXICO, Tlaxco (19º40’5.54”N, 98º6’4.21”W; 2553masl), Tlaxcala, Ex Q. crassipes, (16.vi.2018) vii.2018: 5ŏ (UB), Pujade-Villar, Equihua & Estrada leg.”; “MEX-335, MEXICO, Aquixtla, Puebla, Ex Quercus sp., (13.vi.2018) vii.2018: 2ŏ (UB), Pujade-Villar, Equihua & Estrada leg.”; “MEX-353, MEXICO, Atecoxco (19º45’52”N, 97º57’52”W; 2382 masl), Aquixtla, Puebla, Ex Q. crassifolia, (16.vi.2018) 16–30.vii.2018: 8ŏ (UB), Pujade-Villar, Equihua & Estrada leg.”; (MEX-354 & MEX-355) “ MEXICO, Autopista Km 120, More-lia-Ciudad de Mexico, Ex Q. crassipes, (21.vi.2018) 16–30.vii.2018: 12ŏ (UB), Pujade-Villar, Equihua & Estrada leg.”; “MEX-390, MEXICO, Santa Fe, Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de Mexico, Ex Q. crassipes, (17.v.2016) vi.2016: 4ŏ (UB), leg. D. Cibrian ”; “MEX-449, MEXICO, Tlanchinol, Hidalgo, Ex Q. castanea, without data: 1ŏ (UB), leg. Equihua & Estrada-Venegas.”; “MEX-458, MEXICO, Carretera Mexico-Tuxpam (20º 2’ 41.85” N, 98º 28’ 7.86” W), Lajas Chicas, Hidalgo, Ex Q. crassipes, without data: 4ŏ (UB), leg. Equihua & Estrada-Venegas”; “MEX-462, MEXICO, Rancho Concepción, San Felipe del Progreso, Mexico state, Ex Q. crassipes & Q. acutifolia, (14. vii.2016) vii.2016: 5ŏ (UB), leg. N. Flores”. Diagnosis. This species is characterized with a posteromedian depression of mesoscutum projected anteriorly, reaching scutellar foveae; bottom of depression with subparallel transversal carinae and smooth interspaces that extend to posterior margin of mesoscutellum. This species closely resembles A. tarasco but can be differentiated by the rugose lateral margin of compound eye in A. hidalgoensis (alutaceous and finely carinated dorsolaterally in A. tarasco); mesoscutum uniformly rugate in A. hidalgoensis (less densely rugate in posteromedian area in A. tarasco) (Figs 11D, 11J); scutellar foveae round with median carina extending to full length of foveae, posteromedian depression connecting with foveae (foveae subtriangular posterior and medially limited by rugose sculpture, median carina shorter than total length of foveae in A. tarasco); metascutellum less than 1.8x as broad as high (more than 2.0x in A. tarasco) (Figs 4 E–F). Galls of both species are subglobose bud galls, but A. hidalgoensis has galls with a thin, uniformly coloured outer shell and soft spongious internal tissue, while galls of A. tarasco have a mottled surface and outer shell and internal spongious tissue that is rather hard (Figs 16 H–I). The gall is similar to other species with a large globular shape without a mottled surface; it is not differentiable from A. michoacaensis and A. jaliscensis, but differs from A. quercuspomiformis comb. nov., A. oaxacae, A. tarasco, A. kinseyi n. sp. and A. bassae n. sp. by having a deformable surface under applied finger pressure, because the parenchyma is relatively soft in A. hidalgoensis, A. jaliscensis and A. michoacaensis. Gall (Figs 15 A–B). Usually large, subglobose, detachable bud galls, sometimes with fine tip at apex. Maximum diameter 30–65 mm. Outer shell thin and fragile; internal tissue spongious and soft with central larval chamber about 5 mm in diameter. Hosts. Quercus acutifolia, Q. calophylla, Q. castanea, Q. crassifolia, Q. crassipes, Q. mexicana. Biology. Only females are known. We consider this species to be an asexual form as we have never obtained males after the emerging of more than 100 females from different localities. The mature galls were collected in late May to early June; most adults emerged soon after field collection, some were reared in November. Distribution. Mexico: Hidalgo, Mexico and Tlaxcala states. Remarks. After the examination of A. malinche types, we found great similarities between this species and A. hidalgoensis: lateral margin of eye rugulose; mesoscutum uniformly rugulose with finely alutaceous to smooth interspaces; forewing pattern within the morphological variability of A. hidalgoensis; mesoscutellum with longitudinal median depression posteriorly deep and shallow anteriorly, reaching scutellar foveae, with rugae forming transversal subparallel carinae along median depression; scutellar foveae rounded with distinct median carina, foveae smooth with sparse transversal carinae (Figs 5 A–B). Mesoscutellum is different in the holotype and the paratype of A. malinche; the holotype having an unusually broad median depression and short irregular median carina between scutellar foveae but it might be an aberrant variant of A. hidalgoensis; the paratype presented all the above mentioned similarities to A. hidalgoensis. Furthermore, the galls of both species are identical. Amphibolips malinche were sampled in the state of Tlaxcala and numerous specimens of A. hidalgoensis were collected 30 km away from the location of the two known specimens of A. malinche. The two specimens of A. malinche reared from galls of Q. mexicana, which shares distribution with the rest of host plant species (Q. calophylla, Q. crassifolia and Q. crassipes) in the states of Ciudad de México, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, México, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro. Some morphological variability has been detected within this species: forewing pattern and metasomal tergum II with coriaceous sculpture. Forewing colour pattern is variable in basal cell pigmentation, sometimes clearer than first cubital and radial cell; also, distal third of radial cell sometimes presents a clear area shortly extended into second cubital cell. This character was used by Nieves-Aldrey et al. (2012) to identify A. jaliscensis (see below) and A. malinche, but we do not consider it a reliable character for A. malinche as we have encountered similar patterns in specimens of A. hidalgoensis. The coriaceous sculpture in metasomal tergum II is present in all the species with anterior margin of forewing infuscate, and particularly variable in A. hidalgoensis. This character ranges from coarsely coriaceous and extended past half-length of tergum, to be almost inconspicuous and confined to the posterior third of tergum bordering punctures. This species is currently the only one known to have such a wide range but no correlation with other characters has been found. Amphibolips hidalgoensis is by far the most frequently collected Amphibolips species in Mexico. Such sampling bias might be concealing other, poorly sampled, species’ variability and attributing as intraspecific variability to a possible widely spread interspecific common trait. Alternatively, A. hidalgoensis is probably a complex of species that cannot be sorted out by only morphological criteria. For all these reasons we consider A. malinche as a syn. nova of A. hidalgoensis., Published as part of Cuesta-Porta, Víctor, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M., Silva, Salvador Ordaz, Sánchez, Imelda Virginia López, Melika, George & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Revision of the Amphibolips species of the ' nassa' complex from Mexico and central America (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 4877 (1) on pages 14-15, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4567340, {"references":["Melika, G., Equihua-Martinez, A., Estrada-Venegas, E. G., Cibrian-Tovar, D., Cibrian-Llanderal, V. D. & Pujade-Villar, J. (2011) New Amphibolips gallwasp species from Mexico (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Zootaxa, 3105 (1), 47 - 59. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3105.1.2","Nieves-Aldrey, J. L., Pascual, E., Maldonado-Lopez, Y., Medianero, E. & Oyama, K. (2012) Revision of the Amphibolips species of Mexico excluding the \" niger complex \" Kinsey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), with description of seven new species. Zootaxa, 3545 (1), 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3545.1.1"]}

Synergus gilletti Pujade-Villar & Lobato-Vila, 2017 Synergus gilletti Pujade-Villar & Lobato-Vila, 2017. Zoological Studies 56 (36): 9. Type material: UB (holotype), paratypes in UB, USNM and AMNH [examined by the first author in Lobato-Vila & Pujade-Villar (2017)]. Diagnosis. Synergus gilletti is morphologically close to S. punctatus Gillette, 1896 (see below), but differs from this species mainly by having F1 just slightly longer than F 2 in both sexes (F1 just slightly longer than F 2 in females and 1.4 times as long as F 2 in males of S. punctatus), notauli complete (incomplete in S. punctatus) and the metasoma with an incomplete band of micropunctures occupying 1/3 of its length (with a complete band occupying the distal half in S. punctatus) (see the description of both species and the identification key). Brief redescription. Female antenna 14-segmented, male antenna 15-segmented; F1 just slightly longer than F2; F1 of males curved and expanded distally; malar space 0.6 times as long as height of compound eye; frons and vertex finely coriaceous, without punctures or just with scarce small piliferous punctures; frontal carinae weak and narrow, not reaching lateral ocelli; mesoscutum imbricated with weak, discontinuous transversal elements; notauli complete and visible in their whole length, less impressed anteriorly and interrupted by transversal elements; scutellum wrinkled and scutellar foveae ovate to subtriangular, shallow, weakly sculptured, separated by a narrow carina; circumscutellar carina inconspicuous; mesopleurae basally and medially regularly striate, speculum smooth; metasoma not dorsodistally incised, slightly pointed and with an incomplete band of micropunctures extending posteriorly somewhat more than 1/3 of the syntergite length; radial cell closed, 2.5 times as long as wide; tarsal claws with a basal tooth; both females and males completely black, except for the surface surrounding the oral fovea, which is brownish to chestnut. For more details on the morphology of this species, see Lobato-Vila & Pujade-Villar (2017). Distribution. Mexico. State of Zacatecas (Lobato-Vila & Pujade-Villar 2017). Biology. Reared from woolly galls induced by an undetermined species of Andricus on leaves of Quercus laeta (Quercus section), and from galls induced by undetermined species of Atrusca on Q. laeta and Q. rugosa Née (Quercus section) (Lobato-Vila & Pujade-Villar 2017)., Published as part of Lobato-Vila, Irene, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M. & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Synergus Hartig species group (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Synergini) with partially smooth mesopleurae from the New World, pp. 1-38 in Zootaxa 4822 (1) on page 19, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4822.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4450519, {"references":["Lobato-Vila, I. & Pujade-Villar, J. (2017) Description of five new species of inquiline oak gall wasps of the genus Synergus Hartig (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae: Synergini) with partially smooth mesopleurae from Mexico. Zoological Studies, 56 (36), 1 - 28. https: // doi. org / 10.6620 / ZS. 2017.56 - 36","Gillette, C. P. (1896) A monograph of the genus Synergus. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 23, 85 - 100."]}

Synergus aurofacies Lobato-Vila & Pujade-Villar, sp. nov. (Figures 2–3) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: BC38D9E7-D697-48DA-BB75-0B4BD10ECF38 Type material. HOLOTYPE ♀ deposited in UB with the following labels: ‘ MEX: P234, Bosques de Santa Fe (Cuajimalpa, CDMX), 19°21’09.78’’ N, 99°15’55.02’’ W’ (white label) / ‘Ex. Femuros lusum, 2577 metres, Q. laeta, (28. vi.2016) vii.2016, D. Cibrián leg.’ (white label) / ‘ Holotype ♀ Synergus aurofacies Lobato-Vila & Pujade-Villar, IL-V desig-2019’ (red label). PARATYPES (2♂ & 10♀) deposited in UB (2♂ & 8♀) and USNM (2♀) with the same data as the holotype. Additional material. 2♀ with the same data dissected and gold-coated (deposited in UB). Etymology. Named aurofacies due to the color of its lower face, which is brownish to yellowish orange under compound eyes and around the oral fovea in both sexes, but more evident in males. Diagnosis. Synergus aurofacies is morphologically close to S. cibriani Pujade-Villar & Lobato-Vila, 2017; S. citriformis (Ashmead, 1885); S. laeviventris (Osten-Sacken, 1861); S. longimalaris Pujade-Villar & Lobato-Vila, 2017; S. longiscapus Pujade-Villar & Lobato-Vila, 2017; and S. pomiformis (Ashmead, 1885) (see below), but differs from all of them mainly by having OOL almost 3.0 times as long as diameter of lateral ocelli (about 2.0 times in the above-mentioned species), body and head mainly black (with more yellow areas in the above-mentioned species) and the radial cell about 2.7 times as long as wide in females and 2.4 in males (shorter, around 2.4 in both sexes in the above-mentioned species) (see the diagnosis and descriptions of all these related species and the identification key). Description. FEMALE. Length. Body length 2.3–2.8 mm (n = 10). Color (Fig. 2a, c). Mainly black. Head black, except for a brownish orange surface under compound eyes and around the oral fovea. Antennae dark brown to black, pedicel sometimes lighter. Mesosoma black; tegulae yellow. Metasoma dark chestnut to black. Legs yellow, metacoxae and sometimes the base of second coxae, dark brown to black; tarsi, but especially metatarsi, infuscated. Wings hyaline, veins dark yellow. Head. In anterior view (Figs 2c, 3a) trapezoid, almost 1.2 times as wide as high, genae slightly expanded behind compound eyes. Face faintly pubescent, lower face with regular striae radiating from clypeus, reaching compound eyes and toruli; medial carinae also present, but weaker. Clypeus indistinct, ventral margin very slightly projected over mandibles. Malar space about 0.6 times as long as height of compound eye. Anterior tentorial pits visible; pleurostomal and epistomal sulcus absent. Transfacial line about as long as height of compound eye. Toruli situated slightly under mid-height of compound eyes; distance between torulus and compound eye shorter than diameter of toruli; distance between toruli shorter than diameter of toruli. Frons finely coriaceous, sometimes with scarce small piliferous punctures; frontal carinae absent. Head in dorsal view (Fig. 3b) is almost 2.1 times as wide as long. Vertex finely coriaceous, with scarce small piliferous punctures. POL: OOL: LOL = 6: 4: 3 and diameter of lateral ocelli, 1.5. Occiput finely coriaceous, with scarce small piliferous punctures. Antennae (Fig. 3f). 14-segmented (7: 4: 9.5: 8.5: 7.5: 7: 6.5: 6: 5: 4.5: 4: 4: 4: 6); filiform, not broadened apically; pubescence dense and short; placodeal sensilla visible on flagellar segments F2-F12. Pedicel about 2.0 times as long as wide; F1 just slightly longer than F2, F2 just slightly longer than F3. Last flagellar segment about 3.0 times as long as wide and 1.5 times as long as F11. Mesosoma. About 1.2 times as long as high in lateral view (Fig. 3c), including nucha, with short and not dense pubescence. Ratio of length of pronotum medially/laterally: 0.26. Pronotal plate indistinct. Lateral pronotum finely coriaceous to imbricated; without lateral carina. Mesoscutum (Fig. 3d) about 1.2 times as wide as long, coriaceous and with some punctures; anterior grooves shallow, occupying at most 1/3 of the mesoscutum length. Notauli complete but less impressed and narrower anteriorly, wider and convergent posteriorly. Median groove shallow, reaching 1/3 or 1/2 of the mesoscutum length. Parapsidal grooves shallow, surpassing tegulae. Scutellum (Fig. 3d) rounded, slightly longer than wide, coriaceous to imbricated, posteriorly with very weak wrinkles; circumscutellar carina well defined, slightly upturned but not projected; scutellar foveae triangular, almost smooth, shallow, not well-defined posteriorly and separated by a narrow carina. Mesopleurae (Fig. 3c) medially and anteriorly striate, basally and speculum smooth; slightly pubescent basally. Metapleural sulcus well defined, reaching about 4/5 parts of mesopleural height. Propodeum (Fig. 3g) pubescent, almost smooth; propodeal carinae very slightly curved but parallel, distally somewhat branched. Nucha weakly sulcated dorsally and laterally. Legs. Tarsal claws with a basal tooth (Fig. 3e). small micropunctures not forming a posterodorsal patch; not dorsodistally incised and pointed. Hypopygium finely punctate; hypopygial spine about as long as wide and with a few lateral setae; without apical setae. Wings (Fig. 2a, f). Fore wings pubescent with short marginal setae; as long as body length. Radial cell ambiguously closed, about 2.7 times as long as wide; Rs vein projected beyond the end of the radial cell along the wing margin; areolet small. Rs+M inconspicuous. Basal cell with sparsely spaced setae. Metasoma. Slightly longer than head plus mesosoma, slightly more than 1.5 times as long as high in lateral view (Figs 2a, 3h). First metasomal segment sulcated dorsally and laterally. Syntergite smooth; anterolateral pubescence composed of a few setae; posteriorly sometimes with very weak and scarce MALE. Similar to female, except for the following morphological traits: body length 2.3–2.6 (n = 2). Antennae 15-segmented (8: 4: 10.5: 10: 9: 9: 8: 7: 6: 6: 5: 5: 4: 3: 5). F1 slightly curved and very weakly expanded apically (Fig. 2e). Genae expanded behind compound eyes, more quadrate. Malar space almost 0.7 times as long as height of compound eye (Fig. 2d). Radial cell almost 2.4 times as long as wide; Rs vein more projected than in females and R1 very depigmented (Fig. 2b). Lower face, genae and antennae (except the last segments), yellowish orange (Fig. 2d). Tarsi yellow (Fig. 2b). Distribution. Mexico. State of Ciudad de México. Biology. Reared from galls of Femuros lusum Kinsey, 1937 (Fig. 2g) on Quercus laeta Liebm. (Quercus section).

Synergus cibriani Pujade-Villar & Lobato-Vila, 2017 Synergus cibriani Pujade-Villar & Lobato-Vila, 2017. Zoological Studies 56 (36): 3. Type material: UB [examined by the first author in Lobato-Vila & Pujade-Villar (2017)]. Diagnosis. Synergus cibriani is morphologically close to S. longimalaris Pujade-Villar & Lobato-Vila, 2017 (see below), from which differs mainly by having POL 1.5 times as long as OOL (equal in S. longimalaris), F1 1.3 times as long as F2 (1.5 in S. longimalaris) and notauli incomplete (complete in S. longimalaris), among others (see the identification key); also, to S. citriformis (Ashmead, 1885) and S. longiscapus Pujade-Villar & Lobato-Vila, 2017 (see below), but differs from them by having the malar space 0.8 times as long as height of compound eyes (0.6 in these two species) (see the diagnosis and descriptions of all these related species and the identification key). Brief redescription. Female antenna 14-segmented, male antenna 15-segmented; F1 1.3 times as long as F2; F1 of males slightly curved and expanded basally, almost straight apically; face wide, trapezoid to subquadrate, transfacial line about 1.3 times as long as height of compound eyes; malar space 0.8 times as long as height of compound eye; frons and vertex finely coriaceous, with scattered small piliferous punctures; frontal carinae absent; both mesoscutum and scutellum strongly coriaceous to imbricated; notauli narrow and incomplete, faint in the anterior 1/3; scutellar foveae inconspicuous or absent; circumscutellar carina well defined but not projected; mesopleurae medially with a few transversal striae, basally and dorsally smooth; metasoma not dorsodistally incised, pointed and with a small posterodorsal patch of micropunctures; following segments and hypopygium, punctate; radial cell closed, 2.4 times as long as wide; tarsal claws with a small basal tooth; body black and yellow. For more details on the morphology of this species, see Lobato-Vila & Pujade-Villar (2017). Distribution. Mexico. State of Michoacán (Lobato-Vila & Pujade-Villar 2017). Biology. Reared from spherical galls probably of Disholcaspis on twigs of different undetermined species of Quercus, and from undetermined spherical galls on the underside of leaves of Quercus glabrescens Benth. (Quercus section) (Lobato-Vila & Pujade-Villar 2017)., Published as part of Lobato-Vila, Irene, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M. & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Synergus Hartig species group (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Synergini) with partially smooth mesopleurae from the New World, pp. 1-38 in Zootaxa 4822 (1) on pages 13-14, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4822.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4450519, {"references":["Lobato-Vila, I. & Pujade-Villar, J. (2017) Description of five new species of inquiline oak gall wasps of the genus Synergus Hartig (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae: Synergini) with partially smooth mesopleurae from Mexico. Zoological Studies, 56 (36), 1 - 28. https: // doi. org / 10.6620 / ZS. 2017.56 - 36","Ashmead, W. H. (1885) A bibliographical and synonymical catalogue of the North American Cynipidae, with description of new species. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 12 (3 - 4), 291 - 304. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 25076460"]}

Synergus confertus McCracken & Egbert, 1922 (Figure 4 c–d) Synergus confertus McCracken & Egbert, 1922. Stanford Univ., Pubs., Univ. Ser. Biol. Sci. 3 (1): 55. Type material: CAS (lectotype), paralectotypes in CAS and USNM. Type material (examined). LECTOTYPE ♀ with the following labels: ‘ L.S.Jr. U., Lot. 554, Sub. 261’ (white label) / ‘ ♀ Type’ (red label) / ‘ confertus ’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘Stanford Univ., Coll. L.A.C.M, Access’d 1964’ (white label) / ‘ Synergus confertus Mc. & Eg. (white label with a black frame, handwritten) / ‘ California Academy of Sciences, Type No. 5815’ (white label) / ‘ Lectotype ♀ Synergus confertus McCracken & Egbert, 1922, IL-V desig-2019’ (red label). PARALECTOTYPES (2♂ & 2♀) deposited in CAS (1♂) and USNM (1♂ & 2♀) with the following labels: ‘ L.S.Jr. U., Lot. 554, Sub. 261’ (white label) / ‘ ♂ Type’ (red label) / ‘ confertus ’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘Stanford Univ., Coll. L.A.C.M, Access’d 1964’ (white label) / ‘ California Academy of Sciences, Type No. 5815’ (white label) / ‘ Paralectotype ♂ Synergus confertus McCracken & Egbert, 1922, IL-V desig-2019’ (red label) (1♂); ‘L.S.Jr.U., Lot. 554, Sub. 261’ (white label) / ‘ ♀ ’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘I. McCracken col.’ (white label) / ‘Paratype’ (yellow label) / ‘Ex. gall of Andricus confertus ’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Paratype No. 24999 U.S. N.M.’ (red label) / ‘ Synergus confertus McC + Eg. ’ (white label with a red frame, handwritten) / ‘ Paralectotye ♀ Synergus confertus McCracken & Egbert, 1922, IL-V desig-2019’ (red label) (1♀); ‘ L.S.Jr. U., Lot. 554, Sub. 261 ♀ ’ (white label) / ‘ Paratype’ (yellow label) / ‘ Synergus confertus Egbert’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Beut. Coll. rec’d1939’ (white label) / ‘ Paralectotye ♀ Synergus confertus McCracken & Egbert, 1922, IL-V desig-2019’ (red label) (1♀); ‘ L.S.Jr. U., Lot. 554, Sub. 261’ (white label) / ‘ ♂ ’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Paratype’ (yellow label) / ‘ Beut. Coll. rec’d1939’ (white label) / ‘USNMENT 00960444’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Paralectotye ♂ Synergus confertus McCracken & Egbert, 1922, IL-V desig-2019’ (red label) (1♂). Diagnosis. Synergus confertus is morphologically close to S. walshii Gillette, 1896 (see below), from which differs mainly by having the vertex with some small punctures (without punctures in S. walshii); OOL 1.7 times as long as diameter of lateral ocelli (1.4 in S. walshii); the lateral pronotum dorsally and medially imbricated, weakly wrinkled basally (coriaceous in S. walshii); the scutellar foveae small, ovate (subtriangular, smooth in S. walshii); metasoma about 1.2 times as long as high in lateral view and with a posterodorsal patch of micropunctures somewhat laterally extended (about as long as high in lateral view and posteriorly without punctures or just with a few, not forming a true patch in S. walshii); the hypopygial spine almost 3.0 times as long as wide (about as long as wide in S. walshii); and head yellow, except for a black spot in the ocellar area (dark brown to black in S. walshii) (see the descriptions of both species and the identification key). Redescription. FEMALE. Length. Body length 1.5–2.0 mm (n = 3). Color (Fig. 4 c–d). Black to rufous with yellowish areas. Head yellow, except for a dark spot in the ocellar area. Antennae yellow. Mesosoma black, tegulae yellow. Metasoma rufous, dorsally and posteriorly darker. Legs yellow. Wings hyaline, veins pale yellow. Head. In frontal view, about 1.1 times as wide as high, genae very slightly expanded behind compound eyes. Face faintly pubescent, lower face with striae radiating from clypeus. Clypeus indistinct, ventral margin slightly projected over mandibles. Malar space almost 0.6 times as long as height of compound eye. Anterior tentorial pits visible; pleurostomal and epistomal sulcus absent. Transfacial line about as long as height of compound eye. Toruli situated mid-height of compound eye; distance between torulus and compound eye slightly shorter than diameter of torulus; distance between toruli shorter than diameter of toruli. Frons coriaceous, without punctures; frontal carinae very short and narrow, not reaching lateral ocelli. Head in dorsal view is about 2.1 times as wide as long. Vertex coriaceous, with scattered small piliferous punctures. POL: OOL: LOL = 18: 10: 9 and diameter of lateral ocelli, 6. Occiput coriaceous, without punctures (Fig. 4d). Antennae. 14-segmented, according to the original description (antennae of all the examined specimens are broken). Scape plus pedicel about 1.3 times as long as F1; pedicel 1.7 times as long as wide; F1 about 1.2 times as long as F2, F2 to F6 subequal and following segments progressively shorter, according to the original description. Last flagellar segment about twice as long as the penultimate, according to the original description. Mesosoma. About 1.2 times as long as high in lateral view, including nucha, with short and not dense pubescence (Fig. 4c). Ratio of length of pronotum medially/laterally: 0.41. Pronotal plate indistinct. Lateral pronotum (Fig. 4c) imbricated dorsally and medially, wrinkled basally; lateral margins of pronotum rounded, without lateral carina. Mesoscutum (Fig. 4d) about as wide as long, finely coriaceous to imbricated, with weak, discontinuous transversal elements; anterior grooves weakly impressed, extended 1/4 of the mesoscutal length. Notauli incomplete, faint in the anterior 1/3 (sometimes only visible in the distal half of the mesoscutum). Median groove absent. Parapsidal grooves weakly impressed, narrow, reaching tegulae. Scutellum (Fig. 4d) rounded, about as long as wide, wrinkled; circumscutellar carina weak, obscured by wrinkles; scutellar foveae small, ovate, shallow, smooth, not well defined posteriorly and separated by a narrow carina. Mesopleurae (Fig. 4c) regularly and densely striate basally and medially, speculum smooth; little pubescent basally. Metapleural sulcus reaching 3/4 of mesopleural height. Propodeum pubescent and weakly sculptured; propodeal carinae slightly curved and convergent posteriorly. Nucha sulcated dorsally and laterally. Legs. Tarsal claws with a strong basal tooth. Wings. Fore wings pubescent with short marginal setae, longer than body length. Radial cell closed and 2.4 times as long as wide; areolet inconspicuous. Rs+M inconspicuous, not reaching the basal vein. Basal cell with sparsely spaced setae. Metasoma. About as long as head plus mesosoma, about 1.2 times as long as high in lateral view (Fig. 4c). First metasomal segment weakly sulcated dorsally and laterally, with furrows reaching only the half of the segment. Syntergite smooth, anterolateral pubescence composed of a few setae and with a posterodorsal patch of micropunctures somewhat extended laterally; not dorsodistally incised, very slightly pointed. Hypopygial spine about 2.7 times as long as wide and with a few lateral setae; without apical setae. MALE. Similar to female, except for the following morphological traits: body length 1.5 mm (n = 2). Antennae 15-segmented (according to the original description); F1 about 1.4 times as long as F2; F1 not curved, medially incised, long, expanded basally and apically. Malar space about 0.5 times as long as height of compound eye. Metasoma shorter than head plus metasoma. Distribution. USA. Stanford University campus, Santa Clara County, state of California (McCracken & Egbert 1922). Biology. Reared from galls of Andricus confertus McCracken & Egbert, 1922 on Quercus lobata Née (Quercus section) (McCracken & Egbert 1922). Remarks. Synergus confertus was originally described from 5♂ and 3♀ (McCracken & Egbert 1922: 56). We located and examined 2♂ and 3♀ belonging to the type series: 1♂ and 1♀ deposited in CAS with a ‘Type’ label, and 1♂ and 2♀ deposited in USNM. The authors state that the ‘Type’ was deposited at the Stanford Entomological Museum, later absorbed by CAS; however, in the published ‘Type’ section they do not specify any specimen data details except for the type depository of this species. As a result, and since the descriptors did not designate a holotype, a lectotype has been designated and deposited in CAS. According to the original description, S. confertus has the last tarsal segments black or darkened; however, this trait is not noticeable in the examined specimens., Published as part of Lobato-Vila, Irene, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M. & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Synergus Hartig species group (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Synergini) with partially smooth mesopleurae from the New World, pp. 1-38 in Zootaxa 4822 (1) on pages 15-16, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4822.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4450519, {"references":["McCracken, I. & Egbert, D. (1922) California gall-making Cynipidae with descriptions of new species. Stanford University Publications, Biological Sciences, 3 (1), 1 - 76.","Gillette, C. P. (1896) A monograph of the genus Synergus. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 23, 85 - 100."]}

Synergus agrifoliae Ashmead, 1896 (Figure 1) Synergus agrifoliae Ashmead, 1896. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 23: 189. Type material: USNM. Synergus maculatus Fullaway, 1911. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 4: 371 [not Synergus maculatus Tavares, 1920]. Type material: USNM (see remarks). Synonymized by Weld (1952: 337). Synergus obscurus McCracken & Egbert, 1922. Stanford Univ., Pubs., Univ. Ser. Biol. Sci. 3 (1): 57. Type material: CAS. Synonymized by Weld (1952: 337). Type material of Synergus agrifoliae Ashmead, 1896 (examined) . LECTOTYPE ♀ with the following labels: ‘ Los Angeles Co. CAL.’ (white label) / ‘125’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Through C. V. Riley’ (white label) / ‘ Type No. 3289 U.S. N.M’ (red label) / ‘ Synergus agrifoliae Ashm. ’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘USNMENT 00779886’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Lectotype ♀ Synergus agrifoliae Ashmead, 1896, IL-V desig-2017’ (red label). PARALECTOTYPES (4♂ & 4♀) with the following labels: ‘125’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Los Angeles Co. CAL.’ (white label) / ‘ Through C. V. Riley’ (white label) / ‘ Type No. 3289 U.S. N.M’ (red label) / ‘ Synergus agrifoliae Ashm. ’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Paralectotype Synergus agrifoliae Ashmead, 1896, IL-V desig-2017’ (red label) (4♂ and 2♀); ‘ Los Angeles Co. CAL.’ (white label) / ‘ Through C. V. Riley’ (white label) / ‘ Cynipid on Quercus agrifolia, 125’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Type No. 3289 U.S. N.M’ (red label) / ‘ Paralectotype ♀ Synergus agrifoliae Ashmead, 1896, IL-V desig-2017’ (red label) (2♀). Type material of Synergus maculatus Fullaway, 1911 (examined) . LECTOTYPE ♂ with the following labels: ‘Stanford Univ. Calif. R. W. Patterson’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘cotype’ (pink label) / ‘ Synergus maculatus Full. ’ (white label, handwritten) (x2) / ‘ Lectotype ♂ Synergus maculatus Fullaway, 1911, IL-V desig-2019’ (red label) / ‘ Synergus agrifoliae Ashmead, 1896, IL-V det. 2019’ (white label). Type material of Synergus obscurus McCracken & Egbert, 1922 (examined) . LECTOTYPE ♀ with the following labels: ‘L.S.J.U., Lot. 554, Sub. 67’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (red label) / ‘ Synergus obscurus McC & Eg’ (white label with a red frame) / ‘ California Academy of Sciences, Type No. 5805’ (white label) / ‘ Lectotype ♀ Synergus obscurus McCracken & Egbert, 1922, IL-V desig-2019’ (red label) / ‘ Synergus agrifoliae Ashmead, 1896, IL-V det. 2019’ (white label). Additional material (9♂ & 10♀). Non-type material deposited in USNM (examined) with the following labels: ‘Santa Cruz, Calif., Mar.’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘Ex. 1726’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Q. agrifolia ’ (white label) / ‘ Synergus obscurus McC + Egb.’ (white label, handwritten) (1♂ & 1♀); ‘Palo Alto, Cal., 1915’ (white label) / ‘1726’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Synergus agrifoliae Ashm., cwt. Weld 1923’ (white label, handwritten) (1♀); ‘Pasadena, Cal.’ (white label) / Èx. 1727’ (white label, handwritten) (1♀); ‘StaCruz, Mts. Cal.’ (white label) / ‘Through C. V. Riley’ (white label) / ‘ Synergus agrifoliae Ashm., det. Weld 1942’ (white label, handwritten) (1♀); ‘ Synergus obscurus McC. + Eg.’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘On Q. agrifolia, Stan Univ., Cal. ’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘3B, 1B, Mar. 14, 33’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Synergus obscurus McC+ Egb.’ (white label, handwritten) (1♂); ‘PcificGrove, Cal., Jan 2-18’ (white label, handwritten) (1♂); ‘SantaBarbara, Cal.’ (white label) / ‘1726’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Synergus maculatus Full., c.w.t. Weld 1923’ (white label, handwritten) (1♂); ‘Orange, Calif.’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ Q. agrifolia ’ (white label) / ‘1726’ (white label, handwritten) (2♂ & 1♀); ‘Hopk. U.S. 15640b’ (white label) / ‘Reared June 26.22 (white label) / ‘ Quercus garryana ’ (white label) / ‘Fort Jones, Calif.’ (white label) / ‘L. H. Weld Collector’ (white label) (3♂ & 5♀). Diagnosis. Synergus agrifoliae is morphologically close to S. confertus McCracken & Egbert, 1922 and S. walshii Gillette, 1896 (see below), but differs from these species mainly by having the mesoscutum finely coriaceous to reticulated (coriaceous or imbricated, with weak discontinuous transversal elements in the above-mentioned species), mesopleurae basally and medially with spaced striae (with dense striae in in the above-mentioned species) and the body mainly brownish yellow to yellow (mainly black, dark brown or rufous in the above-mentioned species) (see the descriptions of both species and the identification key). ......continued on the next page * Quercus sections have been assigned following http://oaks.of.the.world.free.fr/liste.htm (Last entry date: May 2020) Redescription. FEMALE. Length. Body length 2.0– 2.4 mm (n = 5). Color (Fig. 1a, b). Brownish yellow to yellow. Head yellow, lower face and genae yellow, frons and vertex usually yellow, with some black near ocelli or even with a conspicuous black spot in some specimens; sometimes, frons, vertex and occiput brownish. Antennae yellowish brown to testaceous, the tip slightly darker. Mesosoma mostly yellow to yellowish brown; mesoscutum usually yellow, somewhat dark anteriorly in some specimens; scutellum anteriorly sometimes black; space between coxae black in some specimens; mesopleurae usually yellow, brown to dark brown in some specimens, sometimes only black basally; propodeum usually dark, rarely totally yellow; tegulae yellow. Metasoma yellowish orange, sometimes dorsally darker. Legs mostly light yellow. Wings hyaline, veins pale yellow. Head. In frontal view, almost 1.3 times as wide as high, genae not expanded behind compound eyes. Face faintly pubescent, lower face with striae radiating from clypeus. Clypeus indistinct, ventral margin slightly projected over mandibles. Malar space about 0.7 times as long as height of compound eye. Anterior tentorial pits visible; pleurostomal and epistomal sulcus absent. Transfacial line about 1.2 times as long as height of compound eye. Toruli situated slightly under mid-height of compound eye; distance between torulus and compound eye shorter than diameter of torulus; distance between toruli shorter than diameter of toruli. Frons coriaceous, without punctures; frontal carinae very short and narrow, not reaching lateral ocelli. Head in dorsal view is about 2.1 times as wide as long. Vertex coriaceous, without punctures. POL: OOL: LOL = 12.5: 6: 6.5 and diameter of lateral ocelli, 4. Occiput coriaceous, without punctures. Antennae (Fig. 1a). 14-segmented; filiform, not broadened apically; pubescence dense and short. Scape plus pedicel about as long as F1; pedicel 1.4 times as long as wide; F1 about 1.3 times as long as F2, F2 and F3 subequal, the following segments progressively shorter. Last flagellar segment about 2.7 times as long as wide and almost 2.0 times as long as F11. Mesosoma. Slightly longer than high in lateral view, including nucha, with short and not dense pubescence (Fig. 1a). Ratio of length of pronotum medially/laterally: 0.4. Pronotal plate indistinct (Fig. 1b). Lateral pronotum (Fig. 1a) finely coriaceous; lateral margins of pronotum rounded, without lateral carina. Mesoscutum (Fig. 1b) about 1.2 times as wide as long, finely coriaceous to reticulated; anterior grooves inconspicuous. Notauli incomplete, narrow, not well impressed. Median groove absent. Parapsidal grooves weakly impressed, reaching tegulae. Scutellum (Fig. 1b) rounded, about as long as wide, weakly wrinkled; circumscutellar carina weak, obscured by wrinkles; scutellar foveae small, ovate, shallow, smooth, not well defined posteriorly and separated by a narrow carina. Mesopleurae (Fig. 1a) basally and medially with spaced striae, speculum smooth; little pubescent basally. Metapleural sulcus reaching 3/4 of mesopleural height. Propodeum pubescent and weakly sculptured; propodeal carinae straight and parallel. Nucha sulcated dorsally and laterally. Legs. Tarsal claws with a small basal tooth. Wings. Fore wings pubescent with moderately long marginal setae, as long as mesosoma plus metasoma (Fig. 1a). Radial cell closed and 2.5 times as long as wide; areolet inconspicuous. Rs+M inconspicuous, not reaching the basal vein. Basal cell with sparsely spaced setae. Metasoma. About as long as head plus mesosoma, almost as long as high in lateral view (Fig. 1a). First metasomal segment sulcated dorsally and laterally. Syntergite smooth, anterolateral pubescence composed of a few setae and with a posterodorsal patch of micropunctures somewhat extended laterally (not reaching the half of the syntergite height); not incised dorsodistally, slightly pointed. Hypopygial spine about as long as wide and with a few lateral setae; without apical setae. MALE. Similar to female, except for the following morphological traits: body length 1.5 mm (n = 4). Antennae 15-segmented; F1 slightly curved, medially incised, long, slightly expanded basally and almost straight apically. Metasoma shorter than head plus metasoma. Distribution. USA. Different localities from the state of California (Ashmead 1896; Fullaway 1911; McCracken & Egbert 1922; and in this work, see the additional material examined). Biology. Synergus agrifoliae was described from specimens reared from a gall ‘not unlike Neuroterus saltatorius (Edwards, 1874) occurring on Quercus agrifolia Née (Lobatae section)’ (Ashmead 1896: 189). The galls from which the synonyms of S. agrifoliae (S. maculatus and S. obscurus) were reared are described by both Fullaway (1911: 371) and McCracken & Egbert (1922: 58) as small round brown galls 2.0 mm in diameter located on upper sides of leaves of Q. agrifolia. Synergus agrifoliae was also reared from galls on Q. garryana Dougl. ex Hook. (Quercus section), according to the labels of some of the non-type specimens found in USNM (see details under the additional material examined). Remarks. Synergus agrifoliae was originally described from 13 specimens (Ashmead 1896: 189). We located and examined 4♂ and 5♀ belonging to the type series deposited in USNM. As it is not stated in the original description, a lectotype has been designated. Synergus maculatus was described from an unstated number of specimens (Fullaway 1911: 371). We located and examined a single male deposited in USNM; however, based on Fullaway’s description there could be more specimens belonging to the type series. According to Fullaway (1911: 331–332), the type material of S. maculatus was deposited in the Stanford collection (later absorbed by CAS), but there are not specimens belonging to the type series in this institution (R. Zuparko pers. comm.). As a result, and since the descriptor did not designate a holotype, we have designated the male found in USNM as the lectotype of S. maculatus. Synergus obscurus was described from 4♀ (McCracken & Egbert 1922: 58). We located and examined a single female deposited in CAS. The authors do not specify which female is the holotype, so we designated the single located female as the lectotype of S. obscurus. According to the original description of S. agrifoliae (Ashmead 1896: 189), females have 13-segmented antennae; however, all the examined females of the type series have 14-segmented antennae (which matches with the descriptions of S. maculatus and S. obscurus)., Published as part of Lobato-Vila, Irene, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M. & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Synergus Hartig species group (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Synergini) with partially smooth mesopleurae from the New World, pp. 1-38 in Zootaxa 4822 (1) on pages 4-8, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4822.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4450519, {"references":["Ashmead, W. H. (1896) Descriptions of new parasitic Hymenoptera. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 23 (2), 179 - 234.","Fullaway, D. T. (1911) Monograph of the gall-making Cynipidae (Cynipinae) of California. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 4 (4), 331 - 380. https: // doi. org / 10.1093 / aesa / 4.4.331","McCracken, I. & Egbert, D. (1922) California gall-making Cynipidae with descriptions of new species. Stanford University Publications, Biological Sciences, 3 (1), 1 - 76.","Gillette, C. P. (1896) A monograph of the genus Synergus. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 23, 85 - 100."]}

Synergus walshii Gillette, 1896 Synophrus albipes Walsh, 1864. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Phil. 2: 496. Type material: MCZ [examined by the first author in Lobato-Vila et al. (2020b)]. Synergus albipes: Osten-Sacken (1865). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Phil. 4: 377 [Preoccupied by Hartig (1841)]. Synergus walshii Gillette, 1896. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 23: 90, 97. New name by Gillette (1896: 98). Diagnosis. Synergus walshii is morphologically close to S. confertus (see above), whose main differences have already been commented on (see the diagnosis of S. confertus and the identification key). Brief redescription. Female antenna 14-segmented, according to the original description (males unknown, antennae broken); F1 about 1.3 times as long as F 2 in females, 1.6 in males; F1 of males slightly curved and expanded apically; frons and vertex coriaceous, without punctures; frontal carinae very short and narrow; mesoscutum coriaceous with weak, discontinuous transversal elements; notauli almost complete, shallowly impressed and faint before reaching the pronotal margin; scutellum very finely wrinkled, interspaces coriaceous; scutellar foveae subtriangular, smooth, shallow, not well defined; circumscutellar carina distinct but obscured by wrinkles; mesopleurae basally and medially regularly and finely striate, speculum smooth; metasoma not dorsodistally incised, not pointed, about as high as long or at most 1.2 times as long as high, and just with scarce posterodorsal micropunctures not forming a true patch; hypopygium finely punctate; radial cell closed, 2.6 times as long as wide in females, 2.3 in males; tarsal claws with a basal tooth; body mainly black and chestnut. For more details on the morphology of this species, see Lobato-Vila et al. (2020b). Distribution. USA. States of Illinois (Walsh 1864; Burks 1979) and Michigan (Gillette 1896). Biology. Reared from woolly galls induced by Andricus quercusflocci (Walsh, 1864) [= A. flocci (Osten-Sacken, 1865)] probably on white oaks, according to Walsh (1864). Remarks. Synergus walshii was redescribed and commented in Lobato-Vila et al. (2020b)., Published as part of Lobato-Vila, Irene, Equihua-Martínez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith G., Cibrián-Tovar, David, Barrera-Ruíz, Uriel M. & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2020, Synergus Hartig species group (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Synergini) with partially smooth mesopleurae from the New World, pp. 1-38 in Zootaxa 4822 (1) on pages 32-33, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4822.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4450519, {"references":["Gillette, C. P. (1896) A monograph of the genus Synergus. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 23, 85 - 100.","Walsh, B. D. (1864) On dimorphism in the hymenopterous genus Cynips; with an appendix, containing hints for a new classification of Cynipidae and a list of Cynipidae, including descriptions of several new species, inhabiting the oak-galls of Illinois. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia, 2, 443 - 500.","Osten-Sacken, C. R. von. (1865) Contributions to the natural history of the Cynipidae of the United States and of their galls. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia, 4 (3), 331 - 380.","Lobato-Vila, I., Cibrian-Tovar, D., Barrera-Ruiz, U. M., Equihua-Martinez, A., Estrada-Venegas, E. G., Tovar-Sanchez, E., Castillo-Mendoza, E., Buffington, M. L. & Pujade-Villar J. (2020 b) Review of the Synergus Hartig species (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Synergini) associated with woolly galls on oaks from the New World, with the description of a new species from Mexico. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 122 (3), 678 - 715. https: // doi. org / 10.4289 / 0013 - 8797.122.3.678","Burks, B. D. (1979) Superfamily Cynipoidea. In: Krombein, K. V., Hurd, P. D., Smith, D. R. & Burks, B. D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Vol. 1. Symphyta and Apocrita (Parasitica). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D. C., pp. 1045 - 1107."]}