Search

Older cancer patients have an elevated risk of sarcopenia. The aim was to estimate the prevalence of four criteria for sarcopenia case finding, assessment, diagnosis, and severity determination: abnormal strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F), low hand-grip strength (HGS), low arm circumference (AC, a muscle mass proxy), and low physical performance (PP). Sarcopenia (low HGS and AC) and severe sarcopenia (low HGS, AC, and PP) and their predictive values for 6-month mortality were estimated in the whole population and by metastatic status. We analyzed data from the NutriAgeCancer French nationwide study of cancer patients aged ≥70 referred for geriatric assessment before anti-cancer treatment. We performed Cox proportional hazards analysis for each criterion separately and all criteria combined. Overall, 781 patients from 41 geriatric oncology clinics were included (mean age: 83.1; females: 53%; main cancer types: digestive (29%) and breast (17%); metastases: 42%). The prevalence of abnormal SARC-F, low HGS, a low AC, low PP, sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia were, respectively, 35.5%, 44.6%, 44.7%, 35.2%, 24.5%, and 11.7%. An abnormal SARC-F and/or low HGS, sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia were associated with 6-month mortality in patients with metastases (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval]: 2.72 [1.34-5.49], 3.16 [1.48-6.75] and 6.41 [2.5-16.5], respectively). Sarcopenia was strongly predictive of 6-month mortality in patients with metastatic cancer.

Purpose: In the elderly three modalities of suboptimal drug prescriptions are known: overuse, misuse, underuse., Patients and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted between September 2008 and March 2009. The prescriptions of 200 patients aged over 75 years admitted in the acute care geriatric unit at the teaching hospital of Brest (France) have been qualitatively analyzed to assess the prevalence of the three types of suboptimal prescription., Results: A strong prevalence of overuse (77% of the patients), underuse (64.5%) and at minor degree of misuse (47.5%) were evidenced. Overuse and misuse were more frequent in polypathogical and polymedicated patients living in nursing home. Underuse was more prevalent in polypathological patients living at home. No significant relation was found between suboptimal prescriptions, age, gender or cognitive status., Conclusion: This study demonstrates the strong prevalence of overuse, misuse and underuse prescriptions in hospitalized elderly patient and analyses the most frequently implicated drugs and the different factors predisposing to these suboptimal prescriptions. This way of analysis of prescriptions could be a pertinent method to improve drug prescription in the elderly., (Copyright © 2011 Société nationale française de médecine interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Assessment of renal function is essential in the management of hospitalised patients, particularly in geriatric practice. Impairment of renal function is common in the elderly, aged of 80 years and over, and should be taken into account before prescribing drugs eliminated through the kidneys or performing investigations requiring iodine injection. Renal failure is also a predictor of mortality. In clinical practice, creatinine-based equations are recommended to assess kidney function. The most widely used equations are the Cockroft and Gault (CG) and the simplified Modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formulas. The former estimates the clearance of creatinine in millilitres per minute, the latter estimates the glomerular filtration rate in millilitres per minute per 1.73 m(2). In 2002, the French high authority for health recommended the use of the CG formula, but no recommendation was given for the elderly. In the literature, no study has compared CG and MDRD formulas with a reference method in this very old population. In the octogenarians, two studies have compared these formulas with the creatinine clearance calculated on the basis of a 24-hour urine collection and four studies have compared the formulas head to head. All these studies showed that the results obtained with the MDRD formula are higher from 10 to 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) than the results obtained with the CG formula. Studies simulating drug prescription showed that the use of the MDRD formula would lead to a risk of drug over dosage in 20 to 36% of the elderly. Also, two studies have suggested that only creatinine clearance measured by the CG formula is a predictor of mortality in the very old population. In conclusion, in the octogenarian, none of these two formulas is ideal. However, based on the results of studies targeted to this elderly population, the best solution seems to be the use of the CG formula expecting new methods of evaluation of renal function., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier SAS.)

Non valvular atrial fibrillation is a public health concern because of the frequency and the severity of its embolic complications, particularly strokes. The aim of this paper is to analyze the recent recommendations for the prevention of embolic events and their application in the elderly. The recommendations for the prevention of stroke, published in 2001 on the basis of the results of randomized studies comparing vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and aspirin versus placebo, have been modified in August 2006. VKA are recommended in patients at high risk of stroke. In patients considered at moderate risk, the choice is now possible between VKA and aspirin, with a reduced dosage of aspirin (75 to 325 mg). The absolute risk of stroke related to age, hypertension, heart failure or diabetes is not yet evaluated. Further studies would be necessary in order to precise the recommendations for patients with only one of these risk factors: aspirin or VKA? In geriatric patients with several risk factors, VKA are under prescribed. A better knowledge of the embolic risk of atrial fibrillation, of the often overestimated hemorrhagic risk of VKA, of the quite underestimated hemorrhagic risk of aspirin and of the recommendations for prevention would be necessary.

Purpose: Delirium is the most common complication of hospitalization in frail elderly. The prognosis is poor with increased mortality and morbidity. Confusion results from one or several precipitating factors in patients at risk. In a randomized study, a preventive multicomponent intervention reduced the incidence of delirium by 40%. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of such a preventive strategy, in the setting of an acute geriatric care unit., Methods: The study was conducted in a French 26-bed geriatric acute care ward. The primary outcome was the comparison of the incidence of delirium among patients aged 75 years and older, before and after the implementation of a preventive strategy. The overall adherence of the ward staff to the prevention procedures was also determined., Results: Before intervention, 367 patients were admitted (mean age: 80.6 years). The incidence of delirium was of 8.99%. In the subgroup of 123 demented patients, the incidence of delirium was of 15.4%. After intervention, 372 patients were admitted (mean age 84.9). The incidence of delirium was of 2.4% (relative risk reduction of 73%, P=0.001). In the subgroup of 133 demented patients, the incidence of delirium was 5.3% (relative risk reduction of 66%, P=0.01). The ward staff applied the prevention procedures in 96% of the 10 230 patients-day during the study period., Conclusion: This study shows that it is possible to apply the results of clinical research in clinical practice to prevent delirium in frail elderly hospitalized in an acute geriatric care unit. Such an easy preventive strategy could be applied in medical units admitting old patients at risk, in the context of a quality procedure.

Purpose: The frequency of pathologies requiring anticoagulant treatment (thromboembolic disease, atrial fibrillation) is particularly high in people above 75. The risk of haemorrhagic complications is also highest in this population of patients.Therefore, the assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of an anticoagulant treatment may overestimate the haemorrhagic risk and lead to the under-using of anticoagulant treatment in such pathologies as atrial fibrillation. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY-POINTS: However, the use of "classical" anticoagulant treatments such as non-fractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and above all, antivitamin K requires special precautions. Several hemorrhagic risk factors are well known and should be spotted out. Finally, the risk/benefit ratio of an anticoagulant treatment in the elderly patients must rely on a comprehensive geriatric assessment., Prospects and Projects: In the era of "new anticoagulant treatments", and particularly of per-os antithrombin, it may seem anachronous to issue a statement over the use of "classical anticoagulant treatments", but in the present state of knowledge, the evaluation of these new molecules is not sufficient in the elderly population of patients.