Search

BackgroundCobicistat, dolutegravir and rilpivirine are all modest inhibitors of proximal tubular creatinine secretion (IPTCrS) and hence a moderate and early non-progressive creatinine estimated glomerular filtration rate (Cr-eGFR) reduction has been observed in clinical trials. Data regarding the impact of combination of those drugs on Cr-eGFR, in the clinical practice, are scarcely known.MethodsChanges in Cr-eGFR after starting darunavir/cobicistat alone or in combination with dolutegravir and/or rilpivirine were studied in a nationwide retrospective cohort study of consecutive HIV-infected patients initiating darunavir/cobicistat. The relationship between Cr-eGFR changes over time and the use of darunavir/cobicistat alone or darunavir/cobicistat plus dolutegravir and/or rilpivirine adjusted by different HIV patient’s characteristics, socio-demographics, HIV severity and use of tenofovir concomitant medication other than antiretrovirals was explored through univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsThe analysis included 725 patients. At 48 weeks, the combination of two or more IPTCrS (darunavir/cobicistat with rilpivirine and/or dolutegravir) was associated with higher decreases in Cr-eGFR [adjusted median difference (±SD) –3.5 ± 1.6 (95% CI –6.6 to –0.3), P = 0.047], and a decrease up to or higher than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 was more frequent [adjusted OR 3.233 (95% CI 1.343–7.782), P = 0.009], with respect to darunavir/cobicistat alone. The Cr-eGFR changes between darunavir/cobicistat and darunavir/cobicistat with rilpivirine and/or dolutegravir showed more significant decreases in patients taking two or more IPTCrS at 12, 24 and 48 weeks. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03042390).ConclusionsConcomitant use of darunavir/cobicistat plus IPTCrS dolutegravir, rilpivirine, or both produced an additive effect in the expected Cr-eGFR decrease.

OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to investigate the dynamics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication and CMV-specific immune response recovery after antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation in patients with advanced HIV infection. METHODS A prospective observational study of patients with HIV infection and CD4 counts of

Summary Background Elevated proinflammatory cytokines are associated with greater COVID-19 severity. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of sarilumab, an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, in patients with severe (requiring supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula or face mask) or critical (requiring greater supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal support) COVID-19. Methods We did a 60-day, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 trial at 45 hospitals in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Russia, and Spain. We included adults (≥18 years) admitted to hospital with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and pneumonia, who required oxygen supplementation or intensive care. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1 with permuted blocks of five) to receive intravenous sarilumab 400 mg, sarilumab 200 mg, or placebo. Patients, care providers, outcome assessors, and investigators remained masked to assigned intervention throughout the course of the study. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement of two or more points (seven point scale ranging from 1 [death] to 7 [discharged from hospital]) in the modified intention-to-treat population. The key secondary endpoint was proportion of patients alive at day 29. Safety outcomes included adverse events and laboratory assessments. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04327388; EudraCT, 2020-001162-12; and WHO, U1111-1249-6021. Findings Between March 28 and July 3, 2020, of 431 patients who were screened, 420 patients were randomly assigned and 416 received placebo (n=84 [20%]), sarilumab 200 mg (n=159 [38%]), or sarilumab 400 mg (n=173 [42%]). At day 29, no significant differences were seen in median time to an improvement of two or more points between placebo (12·0 days [95% CI 9·0 to 15·0]) and sarilumab 200 mg (10·0 days [9·0 to 12·0]; hazard ratio [HR] 1·03 [95% CI 0·75 to 1·40]; log-rank p=0·96) or sarilumab 400 mg (10·0 days [9·0 to 13·0]; HR 1·14 [95% CI 0·84 to 1·54]; log-rank p=0·34), or in proportions of patients alive (77 [92%] of 84 patients in the placebo group; 143 [90%] of 159 patients in the sarilumab 200 mg group; difference −1·7 [−9·3 to 5·8]; p=0·63 vs placebo; and 159 [92%] of 173 patients in the sarilumab 400 mg group; difference 0·2 [−6·9 to 7·4]; p=0·85 vs placebo). At day 29, there were numerical, non-significant survival differences between sarilumab 400 mg (88%) and placebo (79%; difference +8·9% [95% CI −7·7 to 25·5]; p=0·25) for patients who had critical disease. No unexpected safety signals were seen. The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were 65% (55 of 84) in the placebo group, 65% (103 of 159) in the sarilumab 200 mg group, and 70% (121 of 173) in the sarilumab 400 mg group, and of those leading to death 11% (nine of 84) were in the placebo group, 11% (17 of 159) were in the sarilumab 200 mg group, and 10% (18 of 173) were in the sarilumab 400 mg group. Interpretation This trial did not show efficacy of sarilumab in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and receiving supplemental oxygen. Adequately powered trials of targeted immunomodulatory therapies assessing survival as a primary endpoint are suggested in patients with critical COVID-19. Funding Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Summary Background Simplified antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens are desirable for people with HIV. We investigated the efficacy and safety of switching from triple ART to dual dolutegravir plus lamivudine therapy. Methods DOLAM is a phase 4, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, done at six HIV clinics in Catalonia, Spain. Adults with HIV-1 receiving a triple ART regimen, aged 18 years or older, with virological suppression, a CD4 nadir of at least 200 cells per μL, who were HBsAg-negative, and without previous viral failure or resistance mutations to study drugs were eligible. Participants underwent computer-generated randomisation, stratified by the class of the third drug, and were assigned (1:1) to switch to oral dolutegravir 50 mg and lamivudine 300 mg once daily or to continue triple ART for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of people with an HIV RNA value of at least 50 copies per mL at week 48 (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm, 8% non-inferiority margin). Both the primary and safety outcomes were evaluated in the intention-to-treat exposed population. The study is completed and was registered with EudraCT 201500027435. Findings Between July 7, 2015, and Oct 31, 2018, 265 participants were randomly assigned to switch to dolutegravir plus lamivudine (n=131) or to maintain triple ART (n=134) and all received at least one dose. Nine (7%) participants in the dual therapy group and ten (7%) in the triple therapy group were excluded before 48 weeks, mostly due to treatment discontinuations or virological failure. Participants were predominantly male (116 [87%] of 134 in the triple ART group and 111 [85%] of 131 in the dolutegravir plus lamivudine group). The difference in the proportion of participants with HIV RNA values of at least 50 copies per mL at 48 weeks between the dual therapy group (three [2%] of 131) and triple therapy group (two [1%] of 134) was 0·8 percentage points (95% CI –3·3 to 5·2), showing non-inferiority of dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual therapy compared with triple ART. 73 (56%) of 131 participants allocated to dual therapy had 150 adverse effects, compared with 78 (58%) of 134 participants allocated to triple therapy who also had 150 adverse events (p=0·68). Drug discontinuation due to adverse effects occurred in four people in the triple therapy group and three people in the dual therapy group. Interpretation Our findings show the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir plus lamivudine as a simplified therapy switch option for selected people with HIV with virological suppression on triple ART. Funding Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigacion en Sida, and ViiV Healthcare.

Background: To evaluate long term outcomes in patients maintaining a NVP based regimen for more than 10 years. Materials and methods: Retrospective, multicenter, cohort study including virologically suppressed patients, currently receiving a NVP-based regimen that had been started at least 10 years previously. Demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were recorded. Results: Two hundred and seventy four subjects were included. Median (IQR) follow up was 17.1 (13.8-18.5) years. Dyslipidemia (29.9%), hypertension (11.4%) and diabetes (8%) were the most common reported co-morbidities. After a median of 17 years of follow-up we observed a significant increase in general health markers such as hemoglobin and CD4 cells (all p50

BACKGROUND Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and electrocautery ablation (ECA) are 2 of the main treatment options for anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Our aim was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of TCA vs. ECA for HSIL. METHODS Retrospective uncontrolled study of HIV-infected men who have sex with men who had an anal HSIL treated with TCA or ECA. On-treatment effectiveness was evaluated at 6-8 weeks after treatment. A complete response was defined as resolution of HSIL, a partial response as regression to low-grade lesion, and recurrence as biopsy-proven HSIL during follow-up. A propensity-score analysis was used to adjust efficacy to potential confounding. RESULTS From May 2009 to March 2018, 182 and 56 cases of anal HSIL were treated with ECA and TCA, respectively. Comparing ECA with TCA, a complete response was observed in 33.5% (95% confidence interval: 25.8 to 41.6) vs. 60.7% (50.0 to 74.8) and a partial response in 28.0% (20.3 to 36.0) vs. 23.2% (12.5 to 37.3), respectively (P < 0.001). These differences were maintained in the propensity-score analyses. Side effects were common in both treatment, but tolerance was reported as good in 80.6% (74.2 to 89.2) and 82.6% (73.9 to 93.9) of cases treated with ECA and TCA, respectively, and no serious events were described. Recurrence cumulative incidence for the first 12 months was 14.6% (9.1 to 23.1) for ECA episodes and 27.6% (11.5 to 57.7) for TCA (P = 0.183). CONCLUSIONS Our study showed a higher efficacy of TCA than ECA with similar rates of side effects. In our opinion, considering the benefits of TCA, it should be considered as a first-line therapy for most anal HSIL management.

Objective To assess the oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) determination and the cotesting HPV and anal cytology value to detect high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN) in a cohort of HIV-MSM. Design and methods Prospective study of HIV-infected MSM who underwent screening for anal dysplasia. Screening program includes anal cytology, HPV testing, and high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) at each visit. Histological samples were obtained if suspicious lesions were revealed by HRA. Sensitivity and specificity of the different tests were calculated by using histological results of HRA-guided biopsy as the reference test for HGAIN diagnosis. Results From May 2009 to August 2016, 692 HIV-infected MSM underwent 1827 anal cytologies, 1841 HRA examinations, and 1607 HPV testing. At first screening visit, anal cytology results were abnormal in 418 (60.4%) of 692 patients, and oncogenic HPV genotypes were found in 482 (79.5%) of 606 patients. Anal cytology showed a sensitivity of 89.2% [95% confidence interval (CI); 80.7-94.2] and a specificity of 44.2% (95% CI; 40.2-48.2) to detect HGAIN. Oncogenic HPV testing had 90.4% sensitivity (95% CI; 82-86.8) and 24.4% specificity (95% CI; 20.8-28.3). Cotesting showed a 97.4% sensitivity (95% CI; 91-99.3) and 14% specificity (95% CI; 11.2-17.3). In patients with atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance on cytology, oncogenic HPV testing had 91.3% sensitivity and 28.3% specificity to detect HGAIN. Conclusion Abnormal cytology and oncogenic HPV determination showed similar sensitivity for detecting HGAIN. The two tests used together improved the sensitivity but with lowered specificity. In our opinion, HPV testing does not improve HGAIN detection and should not replace anal cytology as a standard screening test for HIV-infected MSM.

Objectives The aim of the study was to investigate whether very low level viraemia (VLLV) (20-50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) was associated with increased risk of virological failure (VF) as compared with persistent full suppression (< 20 copies/mL). Methods From the VACH Cohort database, we selected those patients who started antiretroviral therapy (ART) after January 1997 and who achieved effective viral suppression [two consecutive viral loads (VLs) < 50 copies/mL] followed by full suppression (at least one VL < 20 copies/mL). We carried out survival analyses to investigate whether the occurrence of VLLV rather than maintaining full suppression at < 20 copies/mL was associated with virological failure (two consecutive VLs > 200 copies/mL or one VL > 200 copies/mL followed by a change of ART regimen, administrative censoring or loss to follow-up), adjusted for nadir CD4 cell count, sex, age, ethnicity, transmission group, type of ART and time on effective suppression at < 50 copies/mL. Results Of 21 480 patients who started ART, 13 674 (63.7%) achieved effective suppression at < 50 copies/mL, of whom 4289 (31.4%) further achieved full suppression at < 20 copies/mL after May 2009. A total of 2623 patients (61.1%) remained fully suppressed thereafter, while 1666 had one or more episodes of VL detection > 20 copies/mL (excluding virological failure). A total of 824 patients had VLLV after suppression at < 20 copies/mL. VLLV was not associated with virological failure as compared with persistent full suppression [hazard ratio (HR) 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.00], independently of the number of blips recorded (from one to 18). Conclusions In our population of HIV-infected patients on ART who achieved viral suppression at < 20 copies/mL, the risk of virological failure was no different for patients who remained fully suppressed compared with those who experienced subsequent episodes of VLLV.

Objective: To compare 48-week changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and body fat distribution between patients continuing lopinavir/ritonavir and two NRTIs and those switching to lopinavir/ritonavir and lamivudine. Methods: Substudy of a randomized, open-label, multicenter OLE study was carried out. Adult HIV-infected patients with = 6 months were randomized (1:1) to continue lopinavir/ritonavir and two NRTIs or switching to lopinavir/ritonavir and lamivudine. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed at baseline and after 48 weeks to measure bone composition and body fat distribution in both the groups. Results: Forty-one patients (dual-therapy, n = 23; triple-therapy, n = 18) of 239, who received at least one dose of study medication, completed the study: median age, 42 years, 71% male, 73% Caucasian. At week 48, total BMD increased by 1.04% (95% CI, 0.06 to 2.01%) among patients switching to dual-therapy, whereas no significant changes occurred in patients maintaining triple-therapy. Dual-therapy and older age were independently associated with total BMD increase. Among patients discontinuing tenofovir-DF, a significant increase was seen in total BMD (1.43; 95% CI, -0.04 to 2.91) and total hip (1.33%; 95% CI, 0.44 to 2.22%). A non-statistically significant decrease in femoral and spinal BMD was observed in patients who discontinued abacavir and in those continuing triple-therapy. Regarding fat distribution, no significant changes were seen in both the treatment groups. Discussion: BMD increased following switching to lopinavir/ritonavir plus lamivudine in HIV-infected patients on suppressive triple-therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir and two NRTIs including tenofovir-DF.

To assess the effectiveness of simplification to a dual antiretroviral regimen containing a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients.Retrospective analysis of 131 HIV-1-infected patients on suppressive antiretroviral treatment (HIV-RNA50 copies/mL) who switched to a maintenance dual antiretroviral regimen, containing a PI/r, in three hospitals in Spain. Virological failure was defined as confirmed HIV-RNA50 copies/mL. The percentage of patients remaining free of therapeutic failure was estimated using the time-to-loss-of-therapeutic-response algorithm, by intent-to-treat analysis.Median baseline characteristics of the patients were 14 years on antiretroviral therapy, five prior HAART regimens and 10 different drugs, 24 months on a suppressive regimen and 522 CD4+ cells/mL. Reasons for simplification to dual therapy were nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-related toxicity (46.6%), removal of lamivudine/emtricitabine due to resistance (16.8%), simplification from regimens containing a dual PI, enfuvirtide or tipranavir (20.6%) and simplification from other complex regimens (16.0%). Darunavir (58.0%), lopinavir (16.8%) or atazanavir (13.0%) were the preferred PIs, used in combination with tenofovir (50.4%), raltegravir (22.1%) or etravirine (12.2%). At the end of follow-up (median 14 months), 90.1% of patients remained free of therapeutic failure; corresponding data at treatment weeks 24, 48 and 96 were 93.6% (95% CI, 89.3-97.9), 90.9% (95% CI, 84.9-95.9) and 87.4% (95% CI, 80.7-94.1), respectively. Two (1.5%) patients had virological failure and 11 (8.4%) discontinued treatment due to side effects or were lost to follow-up.Simplification to a dual-therapy regimen including a PI/r might be useful to enhance convenience and/or diminish toxicity in selected treatment-experienced patients.

Fundamento y objetivo La estavudina (d4T) ha demostrado ser un farmaco bien tolerado y eficaz a corto y largo plazo. Sin embargo, su uso se ha asociado a una serie de toxicidades que han condicionado su prescripcion actual. Se evalua la eficacia inmunovirologica y seguridad de pautas antirretrovirales con d4T a dosis reducidas. Pacientes y metodo Se ha realizado un estudio retrospectivo y multicentrico, en el que se incluyo a pacientes tratados con d4T a dosis habituales (peso > 60 kg: 40 mg/12 h; peso 60 kg: 30 mg/12 h; peso Resultados Se incluyo a 982 pacientes. La prevencion de la toxicidad fue el principal motivo de reduccion de la dosis (76%). A los 6 meses el 97% y el 84% de los pacientes tenian menos de 400 y de 50 copias/ml, respectivamente y hubo un incremento significativo de 38 linfocitos/μl. No se observaron cambios significativos en los parametros lipidicos en la lipodistrofia ni en la neuropatia periferica el periodo de 6 meses de seguimiento. Conclusiones La reduccion de dosis de d4T no compromete su eficacia en una poblacion inmunovirologicamente estable. Para corroborar si esta estrategia conlleva una menor toxicidad se necesitan estudios con seguimientos mas prolongados.

Objective To assess the value of several factors to predict the risk of progression to high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN) in a cohort of HIV-infected MSM. Design Longitudinal study of 556 HIV-infected MSM who underwent screening for anal dysplasia (include anal cytology and high-resolution anoscopy at each visit). Methods Progression rate to HGAIN was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Predictors of progression were assessed by Cox-proportional hazards regression. Results Sixty-eight incidents HGAIN cases over 649 person-years of follow-up were diagnosed, resulting in a progression rate of 10.5 cases/100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.1-13.3). The cumulative incidence of HGAIN was 7.2% at 12 months (95% CI, 4.3-10.1) and 16.2% at 24 months (95% CI, 11.7-20.7). Independent risk factors for progression were as follows: abnormal cytology [hazard ratio (HR), 2.5 (95% CI, 1.2-4.9) if low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, HR 2.76 (95% CI, 1.4-5.3) if atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance and HR 7.73 (95% CI, 2.3-25.4) if high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion], abnormal high-resolution anoscopy (HR 3.57; 95% CI, 2-6.4) and infection by 16 or 18 human papillomavirus (HR 1.63; 95% CI, 1-2.6). To be receiving HAART (HR 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7) and have stable sexual couple (HR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9) were protective factors. Patients with favorable predictors had an incident rate of 2.86 cases/100 person-years (95% CI, 3.5-10.3). Conclusion The rate of progression to HGAIN varies according to different predictors that should be considered when assessing the particular risk of each patient. Patients with low risk of progression could be screened at longer intervals. Brief summary We describe the risk of progression to HGAIN in a cohort of 556 HIV-infected MSM. The incidence rate of HGAIN varies widely according to different predictors. These factors should be considered when assessing the particular risk of each patient.

This article has been accepted for publication in Clinical Infectious Diseases ©2014 The Authors .Published by Oxford University Press on Clinical Infectious Disease 60.5. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu898, Background. It is unclear whether metabolic or body composition effects may differ between protease inhibitor-based regimens recommended for initial treatment of HIV infection. Methods. ATADAR is a phase IV, open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial. Stable antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults were randomly assigned to atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg or darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in combination with tenofovir/emtricitabine daily. Pre-defined end-points were treatment or virological failure, drug discontinuation due to adverse effects, and laboratory and body composition changes at 96 weeks. Results. At 96 weeks, 56 (62%) atazanavir/ritonavir and 62 (71%) darunavir/ritonavir patients remained free of treatment failure (estimated difference 8.2%; 95%CI -0.6 to 21.6); and 71 (79%) atazanavir/ritonavir and 75 (85%) darunavir/ritonavir patients remained free of virological failure (estimated difference 6.3%; 95%CI -0.5 to 17.6). Seven vs. five patients discontinued atazanavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir due to adverse effects. Total and HDL cholesterol similarly increased in both arms, but triglycerides increased more in atazanavir/ritonavir arm. At 96 weeks, body fat (estimated difference 2862.2 gr; 95%CI 726.7 to 4997.7; P=0.0090), limb fat (estimated difference 1403.3 gr; 95%CI 388.4 to 2418.2; P=0.0071), and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (estimated difference 28.4 cm2; 95%CI 1.9 to 55.0; P=0.0362) increased more in atazanavir/ritonavir than in darunavir/ritonavir arm. Body fat changes in atazanavir/ritonavir arm were associated with higher insulin resistance. Conclusions. We found no major differences between atazanavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir in efficacy, clinically-relevant side effects, or plasma cholesterol fractions. However, atazanavir/ritonavir led to higher triglycerides and total and subcutaneous fat than darunavir/ritonavir and fat gains with atazanavir/ritonavir were associated with insulin resistance, This is an Investigator Sponsored Research study. It was supported in part by research grants from Bristol‐Myers Squibb and Janssen‐Cilag; Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI12/01217) and Red Temática Cooperativa de Investigación en SIDA G03/173 (RIS‐EST11), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain. (Registration number: NCT01274780; registry name: ATADAR; EUDRACT; 2010‐021002‐38).

Regimens based on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r) are often used as rescue interventions. It is unclear whether significant differences exist between distinct PI/r.All HIV+ patients who had experienced PI failure at two HIV clinics and were rescued with a regimen based on saquinavir (SQV)/r 1000/100 mg bid, indinavir (IDV)/r 800/100 mg bid, lopinavir (LPV)/r 400/100 mg bid, amprenavir (APV)/r 600/100 mg bid, atazanavir (ATV)/r 300/100 mg qd, or tipranavir (TPV)/r 500/200 mg bid were retrospectively examined. A significant virological response (VR) was defined as1 log reduction in plasma HIV-RNA or to50 copies/mL at week 24.A total of 389 patients were included in the analysis: 139 on SQV/r, 35 on IDV/r, 129 on LPV/r, 35 on APV/r, 29 on ATV/r, and 22 on TPV/r. No significant differences in HIV-RNA and CD4 counts at baseline were recognized between groups. In a multivariate analysis, only the total number of protease resistance mutations was associated with a lower VR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.87, p.001). The presence of5 oror =5 protease resistance mutations at baseline was the best threshold to discriminate the achievement of VR in any treatment group. In an intent-to-treat analysis, for individuals with 5 protease resistance mutations, the rates of VR were 64% with TPV/r, 47% with LPV/r, 46% with SQV/r, 33% with ATV/r, 25% with IDV/r, and 16% with APV/r. Adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal occurred more frequently using IDV/r (22.8%) than others (p = .03).The rate of VR in salvage therapy using PI/r-based regimens is relatively high in PI-experienced patients. The efficacy is greatly influenced by the number of baseline protease resistance mutations; 5 mutations is the best threshold to predict the chances of VR to any PI/r-based regimen.

Using a multicenter, cross-sectional, observation study, the long-term safety, metabolic profile, and viral efficacy of nevirapine (NVP)-based approaches in HIV-1-infected patients treated for at least 2 years were assessed. For 4 months, all consecutive HIV-1-infected patients who had been receiving an NVP-containing regimen for at least 2 years were recruited. A total of 613 patients were included with a median follow-up period of 43 months (IQR: 31-51). At baseline, 24.5% (150 patients) were treatment naive, 41.5% (254 patients) switched for simplification purposes, and 34% (209 patients) were failing HAART. Increases by five times or more in AST/ALT values were observed in fewer than 2% of patients. Only 5.7% of all adverse events reported during the investigation were attributable to NVP. The percentage of patients with normal HDL cholesterol levels rose from 17.7% at baseline to 35.4% at the last visit. At the latest time point available for analysis, 76% of naive and 74% of those who had switched had HIV-1 RNA loads of50 copies/ml, while 59% of salvage patients achieved this level of viral suppression. Factors associated with viral suppression at the latest visit were adequate adherence (OR: 2.58, 95% CI: 0.85-7.78, p0.001), first-line treatment (OR: 3.02, 95% CI: 1.52-6.00, p = 0.002), and baseline CD4 cells400 cells/microl (OR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.22-4.47, p = 0.010). Exposure to nevirapine for up to 4 years is safe. Liver toxicity is infrequent and generally mild. HDL cholesterol levels consistently increase over time and viral suppression is maintained.

La monitorizacion terapeutica es una estrategia terapeutica que suscita un creciente interes para mejorar la eficacia del tratamiento antirretroviral y disminuir su toxicidad, aunque los datos que la avalan son todavia escasos. Los inhibidores de la transcriptasa inverse analogos de nucleosidos (ITIAN) no son actualmente candidatos, puesto que su efecto depende de la forma activa intracelular y no de la concentracion plasmatica. Los inhibidores de la proteasa (IP) y los de la transcriptase inversa no analogos de nucleosidos (ITINN) satisfacen los criterios necesarios para ser candidatos a la monitorizacion terapeutica. Las principales limitaciones radican en que los parametros a monitorizar para medir la exposicion al farmaco y la concentracion eficaz del mismo no se han definido adecuadamente. Los pocos estudios efectuados en pacientes no tratados previamente han demostrado que la monitorizacion mejora la eficacia terapeutica. La monitorizacion sera particularmente util cuando el riego de presentar concentraciones subterapeuticas o toxicas es muy elevado (interacciones farmacocineticas; malabsorcion intestinal; efectos adversos, fracaso virologico sin una causa evidente, mujeres embarazadas, ninos). El cociente inhibitorio integra parametros farmacologicos y virologicos y es util en los pacientes con fracasos virologicos previos, aunque es necesaria su estandarizacion. Es importante que cualquier programa de monitorizacion terapeutica se acompane de medidas para monitorizar y mejorar la adherencia al tratamiento. En definitiva, existe fundamento para pensar que la monitorizacion terapeutica puede ser una herramienta util para optimizar el tratamiento en determinadas circunstancias; sin embargo, antes de recomendar su amplia aplicacion como metodo de rutina es preciso estandarizar los parametros que deben utilizarse y realizar estudios con una metodologia adecuada para perfilar el papel de la monitorizacion terapeutica en diferentes situaciones clinicas.

OBJECTIVE: This consensus document is an update of antiretroviral therapy (ART) recommendations for adult patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: To formulate these recommendations, a panel composed of members of the Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA; AIDS Study Group) and the Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS; Spanish AIDS Plan) reviewed the advances in current understanding of the pathophysiology of HIV, the safety and efficacy findings from clinical trials, and the results from cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals or presented at scientific meetings over the last years. Three levels of evidence were defined according to the source of the data: randomized studies (level A), cohort or case-control studies (level B), and expert opinion (level C). The decision to recommend, consider or not recommend ART was established in each of these situations. RESULTS: ART consisting of at least three drugs is currently the initial treatment of choice for chronic HIV infection. These regimens should include 2 NRTI + 1 NNRTI or 2 NRTI + 1 PI. Initiation of ART is recommended in patients with symptomatic HIV infection. In asymptomatic patients, initiation of ART is recommended on the basis of CD4+ lymphocyte counts per L and plasma viral load, as follows: 1) Therapy should be started in patients with CD4+ counts of 350 cells/µL. The initial objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. Adherence to therapy plays an essential role in maintaining the antiviral response. Because of the development of cross resistance, therapeutic options are limited when ART fails. Genotype studies are useful in these cases. Toxicity is a limiting factor in the use of ART, although the benefits outweigh the risks. In addition, the criteria for the use of ART are discussed in situations of acute infection, pregnancy, and post-exposure prophylaxis, and in the management of co-infection of HIV with HCV or HBV. CONCLUSIONS: CD4+ lymphocyte count is the most important reference factor for initiating ART in asymptomatic patients. The large number of available drugs, the increased sensitivity of tests to monitor viral load, and the possibility to determine viral resistance is leading to a more individualized approach to therapy.

Objetivo Efectuar una puesta al dia de las recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento antirretroviral (TAR) para los adultos infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). Metodos Estas recomendaciones se han consensuado por un comite del Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA) y del Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS). Para ello se han revisado los avances en la fisiopatologia del VIH, los resultados de eficacia y seguridad de ensayos clinicos, estudios de cohortes y de farmacocinetica, publicados en revistas biomedicas o presentados en congresos en los ultimos anos. Se han definido tres niveles de evidencia segun la procedencia de los datos: estudios aleatorizados (nivel A), de cohortes o de caso-control (nivel B), u opinion de expertos (nivel C). En cada una de las situaciones se ha establecido recomendar, considerar o no recomendar el TAR. Resultados En el momento actual, el TAR con combinaciones de al menos tres farmacos constituye el tratamiento de inicio de eleccion de la infeccion cronica por el VIH. Estas pautas deben incluir dos inhibidores de la transcriptasa inversa analogos de nucleosidos (ITIAN) mas un no nucleosido (ITINN) o dos ITIAN mas un inhibidor de la proteasa (IP). En los pacientes con una infeccion por VIH sintomatica se recomienda iniciar TAR. En los pacientes asintomaticos el inicio de TAR se basara en la cifra de linfocitos CD4+/μl y en la carga viral plasmatica (CVP): a) en pacientes con linfocitos CD4+ 350 cel./μl se puede diferir el inicio del TAR. El objetivo del TAR inicial es lograr una CVP indetectable. La adherencia al TAR tiene un papel fundamental en la duracion de la respuesta antiviral. Las opciones terapeuticas en los fracasos del TAR son limitadas por la aparicion de resistencias cruzadas. Los estudios genotipicos en estos casos son de utilidad. La toxicidad es un factor limitante del TAR, aunque los beneficios superan los posibles perjuicios. Tambien se discuten los criterios de TAR de la infeccion aguda, embarazo y profilaxis postexposicion, y el manejo de la coinfeccion por el VIH y los virus de la hepatitis C y B (VHC y VHB). Conclusiones La cifra de linfocitos CD4+ es el factor de referencia mas importante para iniciar el TAR en pacientes asintomaticos. Por otra parte, el numero considerable de farmacos disponibles, los metodos de monitorizacion mas sensibles (CVP), y la posibilidad de determinar las resistencias hacen que las estrategias terapeuticas sean mucho mas individualizadas.

Contains fulltext : 59161.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: We recently observed a significant CD4 cell count decline in patients receiving didanosine (ddI) 400 mg, tenofovir (TDF) and nevirapine (NVP), despite virological suppression. METHODS: We identified from our computerized patient database subjects who initiated combinations containing ddI and/or TDF for reasons other than virological failure, including simplification or intolerance. Changes in total, CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte counts since the initiation of therapy were analysed retrospectively. Plasma concentration of ddI was prospectively determined in eight of these patients receiving ddI 400 mg + TDF + NVP and 3 weeks after a ddI dosage reduction. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients were studied. A significant decrease in CD4 and CD8 and in total lymphocyte counts was only seen in subjects receiving ddI standard dose + TDF-containing regimens, despite the maintenance of viral suppression. More than 50% of these patients showed a decline of more than 100 CD4 cells at 48 weeks. In contrast, subjects not receiving ddI + TDF together experienced the expected progressive increase in CD4 T-cell counts. Plasma levels of ddI were elevated in all patients receiving the standard ddI dose + TDF. DdI plasma levels significantly decreased when patients weighting > 60 kg reduced ddI dose to 250 mg, achieving similar levels to those generated by ddI 400 mg without TDF. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of ddI at standard doses plus TDF appears to exert a deleterious effect on CD4 and CD8 counts. Although lymphocyte toxicity related to excessive ddI plasma levels could explain our findings, other mechanisms cannot be excluded. Pharmacokinetic data suggest ddI dose reduction when coadministered with TDF.

Latent parasitic infections can reactivate because of immunosuppression. We conducted a prospective observational study of all human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected immigrants who visited the Infectious Diseases Department of the Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, during June 2010-May 2011. Screening of the most prevalent tropical diseases (intestinal parasitosis, Chagas disease, leishmaniasis, malaria, schistosomiasis, and strongyloidiasis) was performed according to geographic origin. A total of 190 patients were included: 141 (74.2%) from Latin America, 41 (21.6%) from sub-Saharan Africa, and 8 (4.2%) from northern Africa. Overall, 36.8% (70 of 190) of the patients had at least one positive result for any parasitic disease: 5 patients with positive Trypanosoma cruzi serology, 11 patients with positive Schistosoma mansoni serology, 35 patients with positive Strongyloides stercoralis serology, 7 patients with positive Leishmania infantum serology, intestinal parasitosis were detected in 37 patients, malaria was diagnosed in one symptomatic patient. We propose a screening and management strategy of latent parasitic infections in immigrant patients infected with HIV.

Purpose of the study : Switching to ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) in patients treated with double ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r) may result in better tolerability, less pill burden, better lipid profile and a lower cost, while maintaining virologic efficacy. Methods : Multicentre, concurrent cohort observational study. HIV-infected adults with HIV RNA

Purpose of the study : In a prior study in patients switching from efavirenz (EFV) due to neurologic side effects, we compared nevirapine (NVP) full dose (200 mg twice-daily) from the beginning to the standard dosage (200 mg once-daily for two weeks and then increase to 200 mg twice-daily) [1]. Adequate concentrations were seen with the experimental arm but with a trend towards higher toxicity, with 25% of patients having to stop NVP due to rash or hepatitis. Our hypothesis is that NVP 200 mg daily for 1 week and then increasing it to 200 mg twice-daily will achieve adequate plasmatic concentrations with better tolerability. Methods : Patients taking an EFV-based regimen were offered to switch to NVP without changing the backbone. Patients received NVP 200 mg once-daily for 1 week and 200 mg twice-daily thereafter. EFV and NVP plasma trough levels were determined at days 0, 3, 7, 14, 30 and 90. Blood tests were performed at each visit and AE recorded. Chi-squared and Fisher exact test were used for qualitative variables and Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed rank tests for quantitative variables. Summary of results : 22 patients were included, 73% male, median age 48 years, median CD4 569 cell/mm 3 , all with CV 3 µg/mL at day 7 and 88% at day 14. EFV concentrations were subtherapeutic (

Background: Quantification and description of patients recently infected by HIV can provide an accurate estimate of the dynamics of HIV transmission. Between 2006 and 2008 in Catalonia, we estimated the prevalence of recent HIV infection among newly diagnosed cases, described the epidemiological characteristics of the infection according to whether it was recent, long-standing or advanced, and identified factors associated with recent infection. Methods: A Test for Recent Infection (TRI) was performed in serum samples from patients newly diagnosed with HIV. Two different TRI were used: the Vironostika-LS assay (January 2006–May 2007) and the BED-CEIA CEIA (June 2007 onwards). Samples were obtained within the first 6 months of diagnosis. Patients whose samples tested positive in the TRI were considered recently infected. Results: Of 1125 newly diagnosed patients, 79.9% were men (median age, 35.4 years), 38.7% were born outside Spain, 48.9% were men who have sex with men (MSM) and 10.6% presented other sexually transmitted infections. The overall percentage of recent infection was 23.0%, which increased significantly, from 18.1% in 2006 to 26.2% in 2008. This percentage was higher for patients from South America (27.6%). Factors associated with recent infection were acquiring infection through sexual contact between MSM [odds ratio (OR) 2.0; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.1–3.9], compared with acquiring infection through heterosexual relations and being under 30 years of age (OR 5.9; 95% CI 1.9–17.4), compared with being over 50 years of age. Conclusion: The highest percentage of recent infection was identified in MSM, suggesting either a higher incidence or a greater frequency of HIV testing. Information regarding testing patterns is necessary to correctly interpret data from recently infected individuals. Systems to monitor the HIV epidemic should include both parameters.

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) has been the gold standard in first line rescue treatment for many years. No other boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) has managed to demonstrate that it is superior to LPV/r. In this regard, the TITAN study compared the efficacy and safety of darunavir (DRV/r) in 595 patients, at a dose of 600/100 mg two times a day against the normal LPV/r dose, combined with at least 2 other optimised antiretroviral drugs. The efficacy of the treatment at 48 weeks (VL400 copies/mL) was significantly higher in the DRV/r goup compared to the LPV/r group, both in the analysis by protocol (77% vs. 68%), the non-inferiority of DRV/r being demonstrated (estimated difference +9%, 95% CI 2-16), and by intention to treat (77% vs. 67%), the superiority of DRV/r being demonstrated (estimated difference 10%, 95% CI 2-17%). The incidence of diarrhoea and increase in triglycerides was higher in the LPV/r group. The differences in efficacy of both treatments in favour of DRV/r started to be seen from a basal primary mutation in the protease, with these differences increasing as the number of these mutations increased. In patients with virological failure, DRV/r protected the protease and reverse transcriptase against mutations, thus preserving future therapeutic options. We have some theoretical and clinical data available that enables us to consider the possibility of administering DRV/r once a day in some patients with a few mutations in the protease and in those where this dosing regime is considered important. With the results of the TITAN study, DRV/r must be considered the new gold standard in first line rescue, at least in those patients with a primary mutation in the protease.

Adherence is essential for successful antiretroviral therapy (ART), but complex dosing schedules compromise the adherence to and efficacy of this treatment. Once-daily (QD) ART simplifies treatment by lowering the dosing frequency and pill burden. The aim of this study, performed when QD regimens were still limited, was to determine the degree of adherence and patient satisfaction of QD dosing versus twice-daily dosing (BID) of ART.Non-interventional, multicenter, longitudinal study, including initial (I), simplification (S), and rescue (R) therapies. Medical visits were performed at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months. A validated, structured questionnaire was used to assess adherence, and a visual analogical scale applied by independent observers was used to assess satisfaction.From May to December 2002, 978 patients were recruited. Average pill burden was 5 in QD vs. 6.1 in BID regimens. Undetectable viral load was achieved at 6 months in 83.7% (I), 87.5% (S), and 57.4% (R) of patients, with no significant differences between QD and BID. Adherence and satisfaction with ART were both significantly better in QD vs. BID regimens: 61.4% vs. 53.2% (P.05) and 54.4% vs. 41.2% (P.05), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed the following variables to account for 1) Adherence to ART (OR; 95% CI): treatment satisfaction (1.53, 1.30-1.80), family support (1.25, 0.98-1.61), years of HIV infection (0.97, 0.94-1.003) and intravenous drug use (0.83, 0.70-0.99); 2) Satisfaction with ART: simplification group (1.70, 1.22-2.34), QD therapy (1.33, 1.13-1.56), years of HIV infection (0.95, 0.93-0.98), and CDC stage C (0.85, 0.73-1.01); and 3) Undetectable viral load: naive group (5.08, 3.14-8.22) and adherence (1.57, 1.13-2.17).QD antiretroviral schedules appear to be as effective as BID regimens, with better adherence and treatment satisfaction. This may positively affect treatment efficacy at long-term.

Stavudine (d4T) has shown a favourable short and long-term tolerability profile. Nevertheless, its usage is currently decreasing due to some safety concerns. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of d4T low-dose-based regimens.This was a multicenter and retrospective review chart of patients receiving standard doses of d4T foror = 6 months (weight60 kg: 40 mg/12 h; weight60 kg: 30 mg/12 h) and having undetectable viral load for at least 3 months before the d4T dose reduction (weight60 kg: 30 mg/12 h; weight60 kg: 20 mg/12 h). Immunological and viral parametres, lipid profile and side effects were determined.A total of 982 patients were included. The main reason for reducing the dose was prevention of toxicity (76%). After 6 months of follow-up, 97% and 84% patients had less than 400 and 50 cp/ml, respectively, and the CD4 cell count increased by 38 cel/ml. Lipids, lipodystrophy and peripheral polineuropathy improved but there was no statistical significance.A d4T dose reduction in an immuno-virologically stable population does not affect treatment efficacy. Longer follow-ups are required to confirm improvements in the safety profile.

Background. Polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV) is recommended among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected patients, although its effect in reducing the incidence of pneumonia or invasive pneumococcal disease is not well established. Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of 23-valent PPV in HIV-infected adults and the risk factors for pneumococcal pneumonia or invasive pneumococcal disease. Methods. We performed a retrospective case-control study in 4 Spanish hospitals for the period from January 1995 through December 2005 using the HIV database from each hospital to identify case patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae disease and control subjects without a history of pneumococcal infection. Results. A total of 184 case patients and 552 control subjects were identified. The factors associated with pneumococcal disease in bivariate analysis were active injection drug use (odds ratio [OR], 3.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2–5.55), alcoholism (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.86–4.91), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.3–5.1), cirrhosis (OR, 6.05; 95% CI, 3.2–11.4), antiretroviral therapy (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.16– 0.32), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45–0.97), viral load !5000 copies/mL (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26–0.54), and previous PPV (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24–0.65). Risk factors for pneumococcal disease in multivariate analysis were cirrhosis (OR, 5.64; 95% CI, 2.53–12.53), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.21–6.94), and alcoholism (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.11–4.19), whereas protective factors were receipt of antiretroviral therapy (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14–0.36) and receipt of pneumococcal vaccine (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22–0.88), even in patients with CD4 lymphocyte counts !200 cells/mL. Conclusions. Antiretroviral therapy and PPV have a significant, independent protective effect against pneumococcal disease, regardless of CD4 lymphocyte count; thus, all patients with HIV infection should be vaccinated with PPV to prevent pneumococcal disease.

This study assesses the epidemiological and clinical data, as well as therapy and evolution in a recent series of patients with tuberculous meningitis (MT). A comparative study was conducted between adult MT patients with and without concurrent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.From 1987 to 2000, 75 episodes of MT were diagnosed, 39 of them (52%) in patients with prior HIV infection. A comparative study was performed of variables related to the presence or absence of HIV and MT coinfection.MT was more frequent in HIV patients (6.4% versus 1.2%, p0.01). CD41 lymphocyte value in HIV patients was 52 +/- 66 cells/mm3. There were no significant differences in clinical manifestations or cerebrospinal fluid biochemical alterations between the two groups. Extrameningeal TB was more frequent in patients with HIV coinfection than those without (61.5% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.03). Radiological alterations on cranial studies were more frequent in HIV-infected patients. Treatment with four antituberculosis drugs was also more frequent in HIV-infected patients (61.5% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.01). There were no differences in adverse effects between the groups. Overall mortality (20.5% vs. 22.51%) and neurological sequelae (7.7% vs. 5.6%) were also similar.Half of our MT patients were coinfected with HIV. Their clinical, microbiological and evolutionary characteristics were comparable to those of patients without HIV infection. These results indicate that the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies applied in MT patients with or without HIV coinfection can be similar.

Therapeutic drug monitoring is attracting growing interest as a means of increasing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy and of decreasing its toxicity, although data supporting this strategy are still scarce. Currently, nucleoside analog reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NARTI) are not candidates because their effect depends on their active intracellular form and not on plasma concentration. Protease inhibitors (PI) and non-nucleoside analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNARTI) meet the criteria for therapeutic drug monitoring. The main limitations are that the parameters to be monitored in order to measure exposure to the drug and the effective concentration of the drug have not been well defined. The few studies performed in treatment-naive patients have demonstrated that monitoring improves therapeutic efficacy. This strategy will be particularly useful when the risk of subtherapeutic or toxic concentrations is especially high (pharmacokinetic interactions, intestinal malabsorption, adverse effects, virological failure without obvious cause, pregnancy, children). Although it remains to be standardized, the inhibitory quotient integrates pharmacological and virological parameters and is useful in patients with prior virological failure. Any therapeutic drug monitoring program should be accompanied by measures to monitor and improve treatment adherence. There are good reasons to believe that therapeutic drug monitoring can be useful to improve treatment in specific circumstances. However, before its widespread use as a routine method can be recommended, the parameters to be used should be standardized and studies with appropriate methodology should be performed to define the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in distinct clinical situations.

The NEFA Study was a randomized study comparing nevirapine (NVP), efavirenz (EFV) or abacavir (ABC) as substitutes for protease inhibitors in a large group of HIV-1-infected patients successfully treated with antiretroviral regimens containing protease inhibitors.To evaluate genotype and phenotype resistance patterns among patients who have experienced virological failure under one of the three study arms.Patients with virological failure, defined as two consecutive determinations of HIV-1 RNA200 copies/ml, were analysed for phenotypic susceptibility and HIV-1 mutations.Of the 460 patients included in the study, 51 (11%) experienced virological failure after 24 months of follow-up while on assigned study medication. A higher proportion of patients in the ABC [25 (17%)] than in the NVP [14 (9%)] or EFV [12 (8%)] arms selected resistance to the study drug (P = 0.04). Moreover, a much higher number of resistance mutations to one or more of the backbone nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor drugs contained in the failing regimen were observed in the ABC than in the EFV or NVP arms. In general, there was a good concordance among genotype and phenotype resistance testing, except for ABC, stavudine and didanosine, where phenotypic resistance testing added valuable information (fold change in the median inhibitory concentration).Cross-resistance involving nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor drugs might explain the higher risk of virological failure in patients switched to ABC-containing antiretroviral therapy. Phenotypic resistance testing may be helpful in interpreting unclear genotypic results.

The aim of this study was to evaluate specific IgG responses against pneumococcal serotypes 1, 6B, 14, 19F, 23F at baseline, 1 and 12 months after vaccination with the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in 89 HAART-treated HIV-infected patients, 24 antiretroviral "naive" HIV-infected and 30 non-HIV-infected healthy subjects. Levels of specific antipneumococcal IgG and the mean fold increase in IgG levels at 1 month as well as the kinetics of antibodies along the 12 months in all groups of HIV-infected patients and healthy subjects were similar. Neither CD4 cell count at baseline nor "nadir" CD4 cells correlated with the response to the vaccine. In conclusion, the immunogenicity conferred by the polysaccharide vaccine in HIV-infected patients under HAART is at least as good as that observed in healthy subjects.

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors have been proven to inhibit mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymerase gamma, resulting in decreased mtDNA synthesis and consequential risk for the development of mitochondrial dysfunction in HIV-infected individuals. The depletion of mtDNA seems to correlate with the development of symptomatic hyperlactatemia and lipoatrophy. A validated quantitative mitochondrial DNA assay could be useful to monitor and prevent mitochondrial damage in HIV-infected patients, especially in those under antiretroviral therapy with nucleoside analogues. This review analyzes the current methods to determine mitochondrial damage and the available data to support their utility in clinical practice.

This consensus document is an update of antiretroviral therapy (ART) recommendations for adult patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).To formulate these recommendations, a panel composed of members of the Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA; AIDS Study Group) and the Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS; Spanish AIDS Plan) reviewed the advances in current understanding of the pathophysiology of HIV, the safety and efficacy findings from clinical trials, and the results from cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals or presented at scientific meetings over the last years. Three levels of evidence were defined according to the source of the data: randomized studies (level A), cohort or case-control studies (level B), and expert opinion (level C). The decision to recommend, consider or not recommend ART was established in each of these situations.ART consisting of at least three drugs is currently the initial treatment of choice for chronic HIV infection. These regimens should include 2 NRTI + 1 NNRTI or 2 NRTI + 1 PI. Initiation of ART is recommended in patients with symptomatic HIV infection. In asymptomatic patients, initiation of ART is recommended on the basis of CD4+ lymphocyte counts per L and plasma viral load, as follows: 1) Therapy should be started in patients with CD4+ counts of200 cells/microL; 2) Therapy should be started in most patients with CD4+ counts of 200-350 cells/microL, although it can be delayed when CD4+ count persists at around 350 cells/microL and viral load is low; and 3) Initiation of therapy can be delayed in patients with CD4+ counts of350 cells/microL. The initial objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. Adherence to therapy plays an essential role in maintaining the antiviral response. Because of the development of cross resistance, therapeutic options are limited when ART fails. Genotype studies are useful in these cases. Toxicity is a limiting factor in the use of ART, although the benefits outweigh the risks. In addition, the criteria for the use of ART are discussed in situations of acute infection, pregnancy, and post-exposure prophylaxis, and in the management of co-infection of HIV with HCV or HBV.CD4+ lymphocyte count is the most important reference factor for initiating ART in asymptomatic patients. The large number of available drugs, the increased sensitivity of tests to monitor viral load, and the possibility to determine viral resistance is leading to a more individualized approach to therapy.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients ( n = 153) failing antiretroviral therapy after exposure to compounds from all three drug families were monitored for 6 months after beginning a rescue intervention program including tenofovir (TDF). At 3 months, levels of HIV RNA in plasma dropped by a mean of 0.9 log 10 and the mean CD4 count increased by 52 cells/μl. At 6 months, HIV RNA levels had dropped by a mean of 1.06 log 10 and the mean CD4 count had increased by 49 cells/μl. Only five (3.7%) patients discontinued TDF use due to adverse events. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of M41L and/or L210W at baseline was the only viral determinant of a lower response to TDF.

To assess the effectiveness of two regimens with allopurinol or pentavalent antimony as secondary prophylaxis for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients.Retrospective, nonrandomized, open trial.A 1,000-bed academic tertiary institutional hospital in Barcelona.Forty-six individuals over 14 years old with HIV infection, who recovered from an episode of VL between January 1988 and February 1995.Twenty patients did not receive any prophylaxis, nine received 300 mg/8 h of allopurinol, and 17 received 850 mg once-a-month of pentavalent antimony. Patients were followed-up every 3 months, and the endpoint of study was relapse of VL.Twenty-one patients had recurrent VL: 13 of 20 in the control group (65%), 5 of 9 in the allopurinol group (56%), and 3 of 17 in the antimonial group (18%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of remaining relapse-free at 12 months were 9% without prophylaxis (95% CI, 0-22%), 21% with allopurinol (95% CI, 0-51%), and 93% with antimonials (95% CI, 82-100%) (P0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the only significant variables related to relapsing course of VL were assignment to the antimonial group, and the fact that the patient had experienced a previous episode of VL.Pentavalent antimony given once a month is effective in the prevention of VL relapses in HIV-infected individuals. It is a low-cost treatment that proved to be well tolerated. Therefore, pentavalent antimony should be considered a suitable agent for secondary prophylaxis against VL.

Background Information concerning lipid disturbances in HIV-infected women on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is scarce. The objective of the study is to describe the lipid profile in a large cohort of HIV-infected women on contemporary ART and analyse differences between regimes and patient's characteristics. Methods Observational, multicentre, cross-sectional study from the Spanish VACH Cohort. 922 women on stable ART without lipid-lowering treatment were included. Results Median age was 42 years, median CD4 lymphocyte count was 544 cells/mm3, and 85.6% presented undetectable HIV-1 viral load. Median total cholesterol (TC) was 189 mg/dL (interquartile range, IQR, 165-221), HDL cholesterol 53 mg/dL (IQR, 44-64), LDL cholesterol 108 mg/dL (IQR, 86-134), and triglycerides 116 mg/dL (IQR, 85-163). Mean accumulated time on ART was 116 months; 47.4% were on NNRTI-based regimes, 44.7% on PI, and 6.7% on only-NRTI therapy. 43.8% were also hepatitis C (HCV) coinfected. Patients on PI treatment presented higher TC/HDL ratio than those on NNRTI (p < 0.001). Significantly higher HDL values were observed in NNRTI-treated patients. HCV-coinfected patients presented lower TC/HDL ratio than the non HCV-coinfected. In multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with TC/HDL ratio were age, triglyceride levels and HCV co-infection. PI treatment presented a non-significant association with higher TC/HDL ratio. Conclusions In HIV-infected women, the NNRTI-based ART is associated with a better lipid profile than the PI-based. Factors unrelated to ART selection may also exert an independent, significant influence on lipids; in particular, age, and triglyceride levels are associated with an increased TC/HDL ratio while HCV co-infection is associated with a reduced TC/HDL ratio.

Background: Bacteremia is a cause of high morbidity and mortality. Recurrent episodes of bacteremia, its risk factors and characteristics, have been poorly evaluated in the literature, although its occurrence has been established. Patients and Methods: Analysis of 1426 patients who presented with 1579 episodes of bacteremia and who were prospectively evaluated in a university-affiliated hospital during a 48-month period. The risk factors for a patient to develop a recurrence of bacteremia was assessed comparing those with recurrent episodes with those who survived an episode of bacteremia with no recurrence during the follow-up period. Results: A total of 105 patients presented with 248 episodes of bacteremia, of which 143 episodes were recurrent (recurrence rate, 9% of all bacteremic episodes). Two factors were independently predictive of recurrent bacteremia: (1) the presence of an underlying disease (especially a rapidly fatal one [odds ratio, 7.27]) or (2) any complication during the initial episode of bacteremia. Using these factors, the prediction model was significant, but misclassification was high, with a sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 67% for a cutoff point that maximized both factors. Conclusions: We identified risk factors for patients who presented with an initial episode of bacteremia to develop a recurrence rate. The recurrence risk factors may be used as a form of guidance for extreme preventive measures, but these factors could not predict recurrence with a high degree of accuracy. (Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:411-415)

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of a once-daily antiretroviral regimen in HAART-experienced subjects with long-lasting viral suppression.MethodsOne-hundred-and-sixty-nine patients with chronically suppressed viral load (limit of detection ResultsAt week 48, the proportion of patients with viral suppression in the QD and in the BID Group, respectively, was 97 vs 100% in the per-protocol analysis ( P=0.497), and 76 vs 86% for the intention-to-treat analysis ( P=0.176). Nevertheless, CD4 count decreased in the QD Group, with a mean decline of 95 cells/mm3(95% CI: 45–145). Twelve subjects in the QD Group (14%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events, mainly nevirapine-related hepatitis (6%). No significant differences regarding the rate of acute pancreatitis or peripheral neuropathy were observed between both groups. A significant improvement in the lipid profile was only seen in the QD Group. High levels of adherence were observed in both groups during follow-up, as well as a good quality of life. At week 48, a reduction in effort to take medication ( P≤0.001) and an increment in the satisfaction with the treatment ( PConclusionTreatment simplification to a once-daily antiretroviral regimen based on didanosine, tenofovir and nevirapine may be a valid approach in HIV-infected subjects with long-lasting viral suppression. Combination of standard doses of didanosine and tenofovir may have contributed to the CD4 cell decline observed with this QD regimen.

Address: 1Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain, 2Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain, 3Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain, 4Fundacio IrsiCaixa, Barcelona, Spain, 5Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 6Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain, 7Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, 8Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain, 9Hospital Principe de Asturias, Madrid, Spain, 10Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain and 11Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain * Corresponding author

ss Open Acce Poster presentation Risk factors for end-stage liver disease among HIV and hepatitis C virus co-infected patients in the Spanish VACH Cohort R Teira*1, P Geijo2, J Cosin3, A Munoz-Sanz4, P Viciana5, I Suarez-Lozano6, J Lopez-Aldeguer7, E Pedrol8, F Vidal9, T Sanchez10, F Lozano11, A Terron12, A Vergara13, MJ Galindo14, P Domingo15, E Ribera16, B Roca17, ML GarciaAlcalde18, M Garrido19 and P Munoz-Sanchez20