1. Lung Ultrasonography Accuracy for Diagnosis of Adult Pneumonia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Author
-
Dev Desai, Abhijay B. Shah, Joseph Rem C. Dela, Tayba A. Mugibel, Khalid M. Sumaily, Essa M. Sabi, Ahmed H. Mujamammi, Maria E. Malafi, Sara A. Alkaff, Thurya A. Alwahbi, Jamal O. Bahabara, and Lotfi S. Bin Dahman
- Subjects
pneumonia ,lung ultrasound ,meta-analysis ,Diseases of the respiratory system ,RC705-779 ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Background: Pneumonia is a ubiquitous health condition with severe outcomes. The advancement of ultrasonography techniques allows its application in evaluating pulmonary diseases, providing safer and accessible bedside therapeutic decisions compared to chest X-ray and chest computed tomography (CT) scan. Because of its aforementioned benefits, we aimed to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound (LUS) for pneumonia in adults. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed of Medline, Cochrane and Crossref, independently by two authors. The selection of studies proceeded based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria without restrictions to particular study designs, language or publication dates and was followed by data extraction. The gold standard reference in the included studies was chest X-ray/CT scan or both. Results: Twenty-nine (29) studies containing 6702 participants were included in our meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and PPV were 92% (95% CI: 91–93%), 94% (95% CI: 94 to 95%) and 93% (95% CI: 89 to 96%), respectively. Pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were 16 (95% CI: 14 to 19) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.09). The area under the ROC curve of LUS was 0. 9712. Conclusions: LUS has high diagnostic accuracy in adult pneumonia. Its contribution could form an optimistic clue in future updates considering this condition.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF