Search

Background: The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy Study demonstrated that a target blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg during pregnancy is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Outside of pregnancy, pharmacologic therapy for patients with diabetes and hypertension is adjusted to a target blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg. During pregnancy, patients with both diabetes and chronic hypertension may also benefit from tighter control with a target blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg., Objective: We compared perinatal outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes who achieved blood pressure <130/80 vs 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg., Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of a multcenter randomized controlled trial. Participants were included in this secondary analysis if they had diabetes diagnosed prior to pregnancy or at <20 weeks of gestation and at least 2 recorded blood pressure measurements prior to delivery. Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure were calculated using ambulatory antenatal blood pressures. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth <35 weeks, or placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome, cesarean delivery, fetal or neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and small for gestational age. Comparisons were made between those with an average systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg and average diastolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg and those with an average systolic blood pressure 130 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 80 to 89 mm Hg using Student's t test and chi-squared tests. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to evaluate risk ratios between blood pressure groups for dichotomous outcomes while accounting for baseline covariates., Results: Of 434 participants included, 150 (34.6%) had an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 were more likely to be on antihypertensive medications at the start of pregnancy and more likely to have newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus prior to 20 weeks. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg were less likely to have the primary adverse perinatal outcome (19.3% vs 46.5%, adjusted relative risk 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.61, P<.01), with decreased risks specifically of preeclampsia with severe features (adjusted relative risk 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.54) and indicated preterm birth prior to 35 weeks (adjusted relative risk 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.79). The risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission was lower in the lower blood pressure group (adjusted relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.94). No differences were noted in cesarean delivery (adjusted relative risk 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.20), fetal or neonatal death (adjusted relative risk 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.12-2.92). Small for gestational age less than the 10th percentile was lower in the lower blood pressure group (adjusted relative risk 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.96)., Conclusion: In those with chronic hypertension and diabetes prior to 20 weeks, achieving an average goal blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg may be associated with improved perinatal outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the optimal gestational age to deliver pregnant people with chronic hypertension to improve perinatal outcomes., Methods: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of chronic hypertension treatment to different blood pressure goals. Participants with term, singleton gestations were included. Those with fetal anomalies and those with a diagnosis of preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation were excluded. The primary maternal composite outcome included death, serious morbidity (heart failure, stroke, encephalopathy, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, intensive care unit admission, intubation, renal failure), preeclampsia with severe features, hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, or abruption. The primary neonatal outcome included fetal or neonatal death, respiratory support beyond oxygen mask, Apgar score less than 3 at 5 minutes, neonatal seizures, or suspected sepsis. Secondary outcomes included intrapartum cesarean birth, length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), transient tachypnea of the newborn, and hypoglycemia. Those with a planned delivery were compared with those expectantly managed at each gestational week. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% CIs are reported., Results: We included 1,417 participants with mild chronic hypertension; 305 (21.5%) with a new diagnosis in pregnancy and 1,112 (78.5%) with known preexisting hypertension. Groups differed by body mass index (BMI) and preexisting diabetes. In adjusted models, there was no association between planned delivery and the primary maternal or neonatal composite outcome in any gestational age week compared with expectant management. Planned delivery at 37 weeks of gestation was associated with RDS (7.9% vs 3.0%, aOR 2.70, 95% CI, 1.40-5.22), and planned delivery at 37 and 38 weeks was associated with neonatal hypoglycemia (19.4% vs 10.7%, aOR 1.97, 95% CI, 1.27-3.08 in week 37; 14.4% vs 7.7%, aOR 1.82, 95% CI, 1.06-3.10 in week 38)., Conclusion: Planned delivery in the early-term period compared with expectant management was not associated with a reduction in adverse maternal outcomes. However, it was associated with increased odds of some neonatal complications. Delivery timing for individuals with mild chronic hypertension should weigh maternal and neonatal outcomes in each gestational week but may be optimized by delivery at 39 weeks., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure: Torri D. Metz reports personal fees from Pfizer for her role as a medical consultant for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, grants from Pfizer for role as a site PI for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, and grants from Pfizer for role as a site PI for RSV vaccination in pregnancy study outside the submitted work. Sherri Longo reports that UAB received NIH funding for the CHAP trial and Ochsner was one of the sites participating in the trial. Ochsner received a subaward from UAB for participation in the trial. Ochsner is a subsite to UAB, who is in the MFMU network; therefore, they have participated in trials. They have participated in other studies with UAB, including the CSOAP trial. They have collaborated on studies with Tulane and have subawards. Kelly Gibson reports money was paid to her institution from NHLBI, NICHD, and Materna Medical. Lauren Plante reports receiving payment from Cambridge University Press and Taylor & Francis for textbook royalties. She also received an honorarium speaking fee from Monmouth Medical Center. Sean Esplin received payment from Laborie and Nemo Health. Heather Frey and Wendy Kinzler received payment from UpToDate. Todd Rosen's institution received payment from Materna, Inc. and Myriad, Inc. Mary Norton received payment from Luna Genetics. Daniel Skupski received payment from Organon and Cooper Surgical. Leonardo Pereira's institution received payment for a Johnson & Johnson clinical trial. He received payment from Prehevbrio for serving on the data safety monitoring board for hepatitis vaccine in pregnancy. Namasivayam Ambalavanan received payment from Oak Hill Bio and for serving on the advisory board and holding intellectual property with AlveolusBio and Resbiotic. Alan T. N. Tita's institution received payment from Pfizer. Everett Magann received payment from UpToDate for co-authorship of the Ultrasound Assessment of Amniotic Fluid Volume chapter. Lorraine Dugoff reports that money was paid to her institution from Myriad and Natera. Brenna L. Hughes reports receiving funding from UpToDate and Moderna. Eugene Chang reports money was paid to his institution from Roche Diagnostics and Roche. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: It is currently unknown whether adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis at the time of non-elective cesarean has differential effects on neonatal outcomes in the context of prematurity. The objective of this study was to compare whether neonatal outcomes differ in term and preterm infants exposed to adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis before non-elective cesarean delivery., Study Design: A planned secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial that enrolled women with singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation undergoing non-elective cesarean delivery (during labor or ≥4 h after membrane rupture). Women received standard antibiotic prophylaxis and were randomized to either adjunctive azithromycin (500 mg) or placebo. The primary composite outcome was neonatal death, suspected or confirmed neonatal sepsis, and serious neonatal morbidities (NEC, PVL, IVH, BPD). Secondary outcomes included NICU admission, neonatal readmission, culture positive infections and prevalence of resistant organisms. Odds ratios (OR) for the effect of azithromycin versus placebo were compared between gestational age strata (preterm [less than 37 weeks] versus term [37 weeks or greater]). Tests of interaction examined homogeneity of treatment effect with gestational age., Results: The analysis includes 2,013 infants, 226 preterm (11.2%) and 1,787 term. Mean gestational ages were 34 and 39.5 weeks, respectively. Within term and preterm strata, maternal and delivery characteristics were similar between the azithromycin and placebo groups. There was no difference in the odds of composite neonatal outcome between those exposed to azithromycin versus placebo in preterm neonates (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.48-1.41) and in term neonates (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.46), with no difference between gestational age strata ( p  = 0.42). Analysis of secondary outcomes also revealed no differences in treatment effects within or between gestational age strata., Conclusion: Exposure to adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery does not increase neonatal morbidity or mortality in term or preterm infants., Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01235546.

Objective: To estimate the association between mean arterial pressure during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in participants with chronic hypertension using data from the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy) trial., Methods: A secondary analysis of the CHAP trial, an open-label, multicenter randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment in pregnancy, was conducted. The CHAP trial enrolled participants with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure [BP] 140-159/90-104 mm Hg) and singleton pregnancies less than 23 weeks of gestation, randomizing them to active treatment (maintained on antihypertensive therapy with a goal BP below 140/90 mm Hg) or standard treatment (control; antihypertensives withheld unless BP reached 160 mm Hg systolic BP or higher or 105 mm Hg diastolic BP or higher). We used logistic regression to measure the strength of association between mean arterial pressure (average and highest across study visits) and to select neonatal outcomes. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (per 1-unit increase in millimeters of mercury) of the primary neonatal composite outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, or intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4) and individual secondary outcomes (neonatal intensive care unit admission [NICU], low birth weight [LBW] below 2,500 g, and small for gestational age [SGA]) were calculated., Results: A total of 2,284 participants were included: 1,155 active and 1,129 control. Adjusted models controlling for randomization group demonstrated that increasing average mean arterial pressure per millimeter of mercury was associated with an increase in each neonatal outcome examined except NEC, specifically neonatal composite (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.12, 95% CI, 1.09-1.16), NICU admission (aOR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.06-1.08), LBW (aOR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.11-1.14), SGA below the fifth percentile (aOR 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), and SGA below the 10th percentile (aOR 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.04). Models using the highest mean arterial pressure as opposed to average mean arterial pressure also demonstrated consistent associations., Conclusion: Increasing mean arterial pressure was positively associated with most adverse neonatal outcomes except NEC. Given that the relationship between mean arterial pressure and adverse pregnancy outcomes may not be consistent at all mean arterial pressure levels, future work should attempt to further elucidate whether there is an absolute threshold or relative change in mean arterial pressure at which fetal benefits are optimized along with maternal benefits., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02299414., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Rodney K. Edwards' institution received grants from the Oklahoma Center for Advancement of Science and Technology for a pilot study related to postcesarean opioids, and from the NIH through Oklahoma CTR for a pilot trial on warming preterm infants during delayed cord clamping, a Presbyterian Health Foundation Team Science grant for a pilot trial evaluating effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on maternal triglycerides and fetal growth, an NIH grant to evaluate changes in atherogenic apolipoproteins with immediate prepregnancy intervention and whether they were maintained during pregnancy, a grant from Cepheid for clinical evaluation of the Xpert Xpress GBS test using vaginal/rectal dual swabs collected intrapartum, and an NIH grant for a multicenter RCT evaluating intensive glycemic targets in overweight and obese women with GDM. He has a pending NIH grant for a multicenter RCT evaluating prophylactic antibiotics for inductions of labor in nulliparous women with obesity at term. Dr. Edwards served as an expert witness in a case regarding a malpractice claim. Kelly S. Gibson's institution received funding for the Materna Medical research study (EASE). She received payment from the NIH for serving on the RADX grant review committee. She has been a speaker at an ACOG-AIM webinar and received a Ohio State AIM grant for hypertension treatment. Torri D. Metz received UpToDate royalties for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean. Her institution received payment from Pfizer, as she has been a site PI for a phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial, a COVID-19 vaccine trial in pregnancy, and pharmacokinetic study of Paxlovid in pregnancy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (institution received money to conduct studies). Sean Esplin received payment from Laborie. Anna Palatnik received payment from the American Heart Association career development award and from NHLBI HL165013 to evaluate intensive postpartum antihypertensive treatment following gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. Mary E. Norton received payment from Luna Genetics. Leonardo Pereira's institution received payment from Johnson & Johnson/Janssen pharmaceuticals to support a clinical trial in alloimmunized patients. Everett F. Magann received a royalty as an author of the UpToDate chapter on ultrasound estimate of amniotic fluid volume. Eugene Chang's institution received payment from Roche Diagnostics. Alan T.N. Tita's institution received payment from Pfizer. Sherri Longo acknowledges the financial support received for the Prospect study and other NIH-funded studies including CHAP maternal follow-up and CSOAP follow-up. She is also an investigator for the Moms on the Bayou research project with Tulane University and is receiving funding from the NIH Maternal Health Research Center of Excellence awarded to a collaborative effort between Tulane University, Ochsner Health, and RHI. Todd Rosen acknowledges the financial support received as a co-investigator from Materna Medical Inc to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Materna Prep Device; NEIHS/HIN for the Ambient Air Pollution, Weather, and Placental Abruption (APWA) study; NIH/NICHD for The Genomic Architecture of Pregnancy Loss study and Multicenter Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Research Network—MFMU Clinical Center (TAC); NIH/NHLBI for Pregnancy as a Window to the Future study (a CHAP maternal follow-up study) and for Cardiovascular Health After Placental Abruption study; and as a principal investigator for Sulfasalazine to Prevent Preterm Birth, funded by the Hudson Shea Foundation and The Perinatal Research Consortium. Daniel Skupski's institution received payment from Pfizer, as he served as a site PI for a phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial (institution received money to conduct study). His institution also received payment for her to serve as a site PI for a COVID-19 vaccination trial in pregnancy. Dr. Skupski is also a paid consultant for the Organon company in relation to a medical device (Fetal Pillow) used to manage cesarean deliveries performed during the second stage of labor. Rachel Sinkey received funding paid to her institution from the NIH and the American Heart Association. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by type of antihypertensive used in participants of the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy) trial., Methods: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of CHAP, an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment compared with standard care (no treatment unless severe hypertension developed) in pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure 140-159/90-104 mm Hg before 20 weeks of gestation) and singleton pregnancies. We performed three comparisons based on medications prescribed at enrollment: labetalol compared with standard care, nifedipine compared with standard care, and labetalol compared with nifedipine. Although active compared with standard care groups were randomized, medication assignment within the active treatment group was not random but based on clinician or patient preference. The primary outcome was the occurrence of superimposed preeclampsia with severe features, preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The key secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. We also compared medication adverse effects between groups. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated with log binomial regression to adjust for confounding., Results: Of 2,292 participants analyzed, 720 (31.4%) received labetalol, 417 (18.2%) received nifedipine, and 1,155 (50.4%) received no treatment. The mean gestational age at enrollment was 10.5±3.7 weeks; nearly half of participants (47.5%) identified as non-Hispanic Black; and 44.5% used aspirin. The primary outcome occurred in 217 (30.1%), 130 (31.2%), and 427 (37.0%) in the labetalol, nifedipine, and standard care groups, respectively. Risk of the primary outcome was lower among those receiving treatment (labetalol use vs standard adjusted RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; nifedipine use vs standard adjusted RR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.71-0.99), but there was no significant difference in risk when labetalol was compared with nifedipine (adjusted RR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.82-1.18). There were no significant differences in SGA or serious adverse events between participants receiving labetalol and those receiving nifedipine., Conclusion: No significant differences in predetermined maternal or neonatal outcomes were detected on the basis of the use of labetalol or nifedipine for treatment of chronic hypertension in pregnancy., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02299414., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Brenna L. Hughes reports receiving payment from UpToDate. Rodney K. Edwards' institution received payment from the Oklahoma Center for Advancement of Science and Technology and the Presbyterian Health Foundation. He received payment from the NIH through Oklahoma CTR grant for a pilot trial on warming preterm infants during delayed cord clamping. He received a Presbyterian Health Foundation grant for a pilot trial on omega-3 fatty acid supplementation effects on maternal triglycerides and fetal growth. He received an NIH grant for evaluation of atherogenic lipoproteins changes with immediate prepregnancy intervention and whether they were maintained during pregnancy. He received a grant from Cepheid for the clinical evaluation of the Xpert Xpress GBS test using vaginal/rectal swabs collected intrapartum. He was awarded an Oklahoma State DOH contract for support for patient-centered, comprehensive pregnancy care for women with substance use disorders. He received an NIH grant for a multicenter RCT of intensive glycemic targets in women with overweight and obesity with GDM. Lastly, he has a pending NIH grant for a multicenter RCT of prophylactic antibiotics for induction of labor in women with obesity. He has served on an expert witness case regarding a medical malpractice claim. Kelly S. Gibson's institution received an NHCID-MFMU network grant and Materna Medical research support (EASE). She received payment from NIH as a RADx grant reviewer and was an Ohio AIM grant recipient as an AIM webinar speaker. Rachel Sinkey received funding paid to her institution from the NIH and the American Heart Association. Kelly S. Gibson reports her institution received an NHCID-MFMU network grant and Materna Medical research support (EASE). She received payment as a NIH-RADx grant reviewer. Torri D. Metz received UpToDate royalties for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean. Her institution received payment from Pfizer, as she has been a site PI for a phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial (institution received money to conduct study). Her institution also received payment for her to serve as a site PI for a COVID-19 vaccination trial in pregnancy. She has received payment from Pfizer as a site PI for a pharmacokinetic study of Paxlovid in pregnancy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Sean Esplin received payment from Laborie. Mary E. Norton received payment from Luna Genetics. Daniel Skupski received payment from Organon and Cooper Surgical. Leonardo Pereira's institution received payment from Johnson & Johnson/Janssen Pharmaceuticals for an FDA trial on alloimmunization management. Everett F. Magann is a co-author on and UpToDate chapter on amniotic fluid volume assessment. Heather Frey also received royalties for contributions to UpToDate on the topic of uterine rupture. Alan T.N. Tita's institution received funding from Pfizer. Torri D. Metz received UpToDate royalties for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean. Her institution received payment from Pfizer, as she has been a site PI for a phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial, a COVID-19 vaccine trial in pregnancy, and pharmacokinetic study of Paxlovid in pregnancy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (institution received money to conduct studies). Kara K. Hoppe's institution received an NIH grant for a multicenter RCT of remote blood pressure monitoring with health coaching versus standard of care, HHS funding for a hypertension challenge initiative, Marani to study implementation of their remote patient monitoring platform for hypertensive patients in pregnancy and postpartum. Additionally, she received payment for the NIH as a grant reviewer and WisPQC for providing physician leadership for the state quality initiative on hypertension in pregnancy. Eugene Chang received payment from Roche diagnostics for research on sflt-1/plgf. Sherri Longo acknowledges the financial support received for the Prospect study and other NIH-funded studies including CHAP maternal follow-up and CSOAP follow-up. She is also an investigator for the Moms on the Bayou research project with Tulane University and is receiving funding from the NIH Maternal Health Research Center of Excellence awarded to a collaborative effort between Tulane University, Ochsner Health, and RHI. Alan T.N. Tita's institution received funding from Pfizer. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the association between maternal blood pressure (BP) below 130/80 mm Hg compared with 130-139/80-89 mm Hg and pregnancy outcomes., Methods: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy), an open label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Participants with mean BP below 140/90 mm Hg were grouped as below 130/80 mm Hg compared with 130-139/80-89 mm Hg by averaging postrandomization clinic BP throughout pregnancy. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA)., Results: Of 2,408 patients in CHAP, 2,096 met study criteria; 1,328 had mean BP 130-139/80-89 mm Hg and 768 had mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg were more likely to be older, on antihypertensive medication, in the active treatment arm, and to have lower BP at enrollment. Mean clinic BP below 130/80 mm Hg was associated with lower frequency of the primary outcome (16.0% vs 35.8%, adjusted relative risk 0.45; 95% CI 0.38-0.54) as well as lower risk of severe preeclampsia and indicated birth before 35 weeks of gestation. There was no association with SGA., Conclusion: In pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension, mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg was associated with improved pregnancy outcomes without increased risk of SGA., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02299414., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Alan T.N. Tita reported money was paid to his institution by Pfizer for his efforts on this study. Torri D. Metz disclosed money was paid to her from UpToDate for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean, and money was paid to her institution from Gestvision as a site PI for a preeclampsia point-of-care test; her institution received money to conduct the study (ended August 2020). She has been a site PI for Pfizer on a phase III RSV vaccine trial, and her institution received money to conduct the study. She has also been a member of the Pfizer medical advisory board (1/15/21) and site PI for a COVID-19 vaccination trial in pregnancy. She has served on the SMFM Board of Directors. Lorraine Dugoff reports money was paid to her institution from Laboratory Holdings, Inc. and Natera, Inc. Brenna L. Hughes reports receiving payment from UpToDate. Mary E. Norton reports receiving payment from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Luna Genetics. Daniel Skupski disclosed he is a consultant for Cooper Surgical, Inc, and has received payment from Organon. Namasivayam Ambalayanan reports receiving payment from Resbiotic/AlveolusBio and Shire/Oak Hill Bio. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Increased duration of breastfeeding improves maternal cardiovascular health and may be especially beneficial in high-risk populations, such as those with chronic hypertension. Others have shown that individuals with hypertension are less likely to breastfeed, and there has been limited research aimed at supporting breastfeeding goals in this population. The impact of perinatal blood pressure control on breastfeeding outcomes among people with chronic hypertension is unknown., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether breastfeeding initiation and short-term duration assessed at the postpartum clinic visit differed according to perinatal blood pressure treatment strategy (targeting blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg vs reserving antihypertensive treatment for blood pressure ≥160/105 mm Hg)., Study Design: We performed a secondary analysis of the Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy trial. This was an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial where pregnant participants with mild chronic hypertension were randomized to receive antihypertensive medications with goal blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg (active treatment) or deferred treatment until blood pressure ≥160/105 mm Hg (control). The primary outcome was initiation and duration of breastfeeding, assessed at the postpartum clinic visit. We performed bivariate analyses and log-binomial and cumulative logit regression models, adjusting models for variables that were unbalanced in bivariate analyses. We performed additional analyses to explore the relationship between breastfeeding duration and blood pressure measurements at the postpartum visit., Results: Of the 2408 participants from the Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy trial, 1444 (60%) attended the postpartum study visit and provided breastfeeding information. Participants in the active treatment group had different body mass index class distribution and earlier gestational age at enrollment, and (by design) were more often discharged on antihypertensives. Breastfeeding outcomes did not differ significantly by treatment group. In the active and control treatment groups, 563 (77.5%) and 561 (78.1%) initiated breastfeeding, and mean durations of breastfeeding were 6.5±2.3 and 6.3±2.1 weeks, respectively. The probability of ever breastfeeding (adjusted relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.05), current breastfeeding at postpartum visit (adjusted relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.10), and weeks of breastfeeding (adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.12) did not differ by treatment group. Increased duration (≥2 vs <2 weeks) of breastfeeding was associated with slightly lower blood pressure measurements at the postpartum visit, but these differences were not significant in adjusted models., Conclusion: In a secondary analysis of the cohort of Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy trial participants who attended the postpartum study visit and provided breastfeeding information (60% of original trial participants), breastfeeding outcomes did not differ significantly by treatment group. This suggests that maintaining goal blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg throughout the perinatal period is associated with neither harm nor benefit for short-term breastfeeding goals. Further study is needed to understand long-term breastfeeding outcomes among individuals with chronic hypertension and how to support this population in achieving their breastfeeding goals., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: COVID-19 is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and is associated with critical illness requiring hospitalization, maternal mortality, stillbirth, and preterm birth. SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to induce placental pathology. However, substantial gaps exist in our understanding of the pathophysiology of COVID-19 disease in pregnancy and the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the placenta and fetus. To what extent a SARS-CoV-2 infection of the placenta alters the placental antiviral innate immune response is not well understood. A dysregulated innate immune response in the setting of maternal COVID-19 disease may increase the risk of inflammatory tissue injury or placental compromise and may contribute to deleterious pregnancy outcomes., Objective: We sought to determine the impact of a maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on placental immune response by evaluating gene expression of a panel of 6 antiviral innate immune mediators that act as biomarkers of the antiviral and interferon cytokine response. Our hypothesis was that a SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy would result in an up-regulated placental antiviral innate immune response., Study Design: We performed a case-control study on placental tissues (chorionic villous tissues and chorioamniotic membrane) collected from pregnant patients with (N=140) and without (N=24) COVID-19 disease. We performed real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry, and the placental histopathology was evaluated. Clinical data were abstracted. Fisher exact test, Pearson correlations, and linear regression models were used to examine proportions and continuous data between patients with active (<10 days since diagnosis) vs recovered COVID-19 (>10 days since diagnosis) at the time of delivery. Secondary regression models adjusted for labor status as a covariate and evaluated potential correlation between placental innate immune gene expression and other variables., Results: SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was detected in placental tissues from 5 women with COVID-19 and from no controls (0/24, 0%). Only 1 of 5 cases with detectable SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in placental tissues was confirmed to express SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike proteins in syncytiotrophoblast cells. We detected a considerably lower gene expression of 5 critical innate immune mediators (IFNB, IFIT1, MXA, IL6, IL1B) in the chorionic villi and chorioamniotic membranes from women with active or recovered COVID-19 than controls, which remained significant after adjustment for labor status. There were minimal correlations between placental gene expression and other studied variables including gestational age at diagnosis, time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and delivery, prepregnancy body mass index, COVID-19 disease severity, or placental pathology., Conclusion: A maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with an impaired placental innate immune response in chorionic villous tissues and chorioamniotic membranes that was not correlated with gestational age at COVID-19 diagnosis, time interval from COVID-19 diagnosis to delivery, maternal obesity, disease severity, or placental pathology., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the frequency of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) by type of skin preparation used for unscheduled cesarean in the setting of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis., Methods: Secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial of adjunctive azithromycin (500 mg intravenous) versus placebo in women who were ≥24 weeks gestation and undergoing unscheduled cesarean (i.e. during labor or ≥4 h after membrane rupture). Type of skin preparation used was identified based on the protocol at the hospital at the time of delivery: iodine-alcohol, chlorhexidine, chlorhexidine-alcohol, or the combination of chlorhexidine-alcohol and iodine. The primary outcome of this analysis was incidence of post-operative SSI, as defined by CDC criteria. Multivariable logistic regression was applied for adjustments., Results: All 2013 women in the primary trial were included in this analysis. Women were grouped according to type of skin preparation received: iodine-alcohol ( n  = 193), chlorhexidine ( n  = 733), chlorhexidine-alcohol ( n  = 656), and chlorhexidine-alcohol and iodine combined sequentially ( n  = 431). The unadjusted rates of wound infection ranged from 2.9% to 5.7%. Using iodine-alcohol as the referent, the adjusted odds ratios for wound SSI were 0.71 (95% CI 0.30-1.66) for chlorhexidine, 0.97 (95% CI 0.41-2.28) for chlorhexidine-alcohol, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.36-2.20) for chlorhexidine-alcohol with iodine combination., Conclusion: In women undergoing unscheduled cesarean delivery in a trial of adjunctive azithromycin, the type of skin preparation used did not appear to be associated with the frequency of wound SSI.

Objective: To estimate the association between timing of administration of adjunctive azithromycin for prophylaxis at unscheduled cesarean delivery and maternal infection and neonatal morbidity., Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized trial of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis in patients with singleton gestations who were undergoing unscheduled cesarean delivery. The primary exposure was the timing of initiation of the study drug (after skin incision or 0-30 minutes, more than 30-60 minutes, or more than 60 minutes before skin incision). The primary outcome was a composite of endometritis, wound infection, and other maternal infections occurring up to 6 weeks after cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included composite neonatal morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission for longer than 72 hours, and neonatal sepsis. The association of azithromycin with outcomes was compared within each antibiotic timing group and presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. A Breslow-Day homogeneity test was applied to assess differences in association by antibiotic timing., Results: Of 2,013 participants, antibiotics were initiated after skin incision (median 3 minutes, range 0-229 minutes) in 269 (13.4%), 0-30 minutes before skin incision in 1,378 (68.5%), more than 30-60 minutes before skin incision in 270 (13.4%), and more than 60 minutes before skin incision (median 85 minutes, range 61-218 minutes) in 96 (4.8%). The RRs (95% CIs) of the infectious composite outcome for azithromycin compared with placebo were significantly lower for groups that initiated azithromycin after skin incision or within 1 hour before skin incision (after skin incision: RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.76; 0-30 minutes before: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.89; more than 30-60 minutes before: 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.66). Risks were not significantly different in patients who received azithromycin more than 60 minutes before skin incision (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.10-3.36). Results were similar when endometritis and wound infections were analyzed separately. Neonatal outcomes were not significantly different for azithromycin compared with placebo across all timing groups., Conclusion: Adjunctive azithromycin administration up to 60 minutes before or at a median of 3 minutes after skin incision was associated with reduced risks of maternal composite postoperative infection in unscheduled cesarean deliveries., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01235546., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Sherri Longo reported that money was paid to her institution: University of Alabama received the primary NIH grant, and Ochsner (her institution) participated in the study with her as the PI at Ochsner (received financial support from UAB). Michelle Owens reported receiving payment from AMAG pharmaceuticals, Progenity, and Quidel. Alan T.N. Tita reported that money was paid to his institution (University of Alabama at Birmingham) from Pfizer and the CDC. Sean Esplin served on the scientific advisory board of Clinical Innovations and holds stock for Sera Prognostics. Sean Blackwell reported financial support from the NIH/NICHD, Hologic, AMAG and Clinical Computer Systems Inc. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The benefits and safety of the treatment of mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure, <160/100 mm Hg) during pregnancy are uncertain. Data are needed on whether a strategy of targeting a blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg reduces the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes without compromising fetal growth., Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned pregnant women with mild chronic hypertension and singleton fetuses at a gestational age of less than 23 weeks to receive antihypertensive medications recommended for use in pregnancy (active-treatment group) or to receive no such treatment unless severe hypertension (systolic pressure, ≥160 mm Hg; or diastolic pressure, ≥105 mm Hg) developed (control group). The primary outcome was a composite of preeclampsia with severe features, medically indicated preterm birth at less than 35 weeks' gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The safety outcome was small-for-gestational-age birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age. Secondary outcomes included composites of serious neonatal or maternal complications, preeclampsia, and preterm birth., Results: A total of 2408 women were enrolled in the trial. The incidence of a primary-outcome event was lower in the active-treatment group than in the control group (30.2% vs. 37.0%), for an adjusted risk ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.92; P<0.001). The percentage of small-for-gestational-age birth weights below the 10th percentile was 11.2% in the active-treatment group and 10.4% in the control group (adjusted risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.31; P = 0.76). The incidence of serious maternal complications was 2.1% and 2.8%, respectively (risk ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.26), and the incidence of severe neonatal complications was 2.0% and 2.6% (risk ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.30). The incidence of any preeclampsia in the two groups was 24.4% and 31.1%, respectively (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.89), and the incidence of preterm birth was 27.5% and 31.4% (risk ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.99)., Conclusions: In pregnant women with mild chronic hypertension, a strategy of targeting a blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg was associated with better pregnancy outcomes than a strategy of reserving treatment only for severe hypertension, with no increase in the risk of small-for-gestational-age birth weight. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; CHAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02299414.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Objective: This study was aimed to evaluate the relationship between cesarean skin incision length and wound complications., Study Design: Planned secondary analysis of a multicenter double-blind randomized trial of adjunctive azithromycin versus placebo (in addition to standard cefazolin) in women ≥24 weeks undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or ≥4 hours after membrane rupture. Skin incision length (cm) was measured just prior to skin closure. The primary outcome was a composite of wound complications (wound infection, separation, seroma, hematoma, or dehiscence) up to 6 weeks of postpartum. Individual components of the composite were examined as secondary outcomes. Outcomes were compared between groups defined by the lowest (≤25th), middle (25-75th) and highest (>75th) incision length quartiles. Logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounding variables., Results: Of the 2,013 women enrolled in the primary trial, 1,916 had recorded incision lengths and were included in this secondary analysis. The overall rate of composite wound complications was 7.8%. Median incision length was 15.0 cm (interquartile range: 14.0-16.5) with the lowest quartile defined as ≤14, middle as >14 to ≤16.5, and highest as >16.5 cm. Mean BMI, parity, use of staples, and duration of surgery differed significantly between the three incision length groups. In unadjusted analysis, the longest incision lengths were associated with an increased risk of the wound composite and wound infections (odds ratio [OR] = 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-3.60 and OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.27-4.15, respectively) compared with the shortest incision lengths. However, after multivariable adjustments, these associations were nullified. Additional analyses considering incision length as a continuous variable and using 10th/90th percentile cut-offs still did not suggest any associations with outcomes., Conclusion: Increasing skin incision length is not independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative wound complications., Key Points: · After multivariable adjustments, skin incision length was not independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative wound complications.. · A reasonable incision length needed to safely perform the procedure should be used.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

The single biggest factor driving health outcomes is patient behavior. The CHR Model (County Health Rankings Model) weights socioeconomic factors, lifestyle behaviors, and physical environment factors collectively at 80% in driving impact on health outcomes, to the 20% weight for access to and quality of clinical care. Commercial determinants of health affect everyone today and unhealthy choices worsen pre-existing economic, social, and racial inequities. Yet there is a disproportionate focus on therapeutic intervention to the exclusion of shaping patient behaviors to improve healthcare. If the recent pandemic taught us a critically important lesson, it is the imperative to look beyond clinical care. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), long-standing systemic health and social inequities put various groups of people at higher risk of getting sick and dying from COVID-19, including many racial and ethnic minority groups. The virus was simply more efficient in detecting such vulnerabilities than the guardians of these physiologies. These insights from the pandemic come at the heel of a confluence of three major accelerants that may radically reshape our approaches to hot-spotting vulnerabilities and managing them before they manifest in a derangement or disease. They are the recent strides in behavioral economics and behavior science; advances in remote monitoring and personal health technologies; and developments in artificial intelligence and data sciences. These accelerants allow us to imagine a previously impossible vision-we can now build and maintain a unified health algorithm for every individual that can dynamically track the two interdependent streams of risk, clinical and behavioral., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interests: Vasant Kumar Ramaswamy is a co-founder of CareCentra, and Dr Gaurav Laroia is a Strategic Advisor to CareCentra. Dr Horne is an inventor of clinical decision tools that are licensed to CareCentra and Alluceo, is a member of the scientific advisory board of LabMe, is the PI of grants involving clinical decision tools that were funded by the Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation, CareCentra, GlaxoSmithKline, and AstraZeneca, and is a co-investigator of a grant funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)., (© The Author(s) 2022.)

Background: As early life interventions for congenital heart disease improve, more patients are living to adulthood and are considering pregnancy. Scoring and classification systems predict the maternal cardiovascular risk of pregnancy in the context of congenital heart disease, but these scoring systems do not assess the potential subsequent risks following pregnancy. Data on the long-term cardiac outcomes after pregnancy are unknown for most lesion types. This limits the ability of healthcare practitioners to thoroughly counsel patients who are considering pregnancy in the setting of congenital heart disease., Objective: We aimed to evaluate the association between pregnancy and the subsequent long-term cardiovascular health of individuals with congenital heart disease., Study Design: This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of individuals identifying as female who were receiving care in two adult congenital heart disease centers from 2014 to 2019. Patient data were abstracted longitudinally from a patient age of 15 years (or from the time of entry into the healthcare system) to the conclusion of the study, death, or exit from the healthcare system. The primary endpoint, a composite adverse cardiac outcome (death, stroke, heart failure, unanticipated cardiac surgery, or a requirement for a catheterized procedure), was compared between parous (at least one pregnancy >20 weeks' gestation) and nulliparous individuals. By accounting for differences in the follow-up, the effect of pregnancy was estimated based on the time to the composite adverse outcome in a proportional hazards regression model adjusted for the World Health Organization class, baseline cardiac medications, and number of previous sternotomies. Participants were also categorized according to their lesion type, including septal defects (ventricular septal defects, atrial septal defects, atrioventricular septal defects, or atrioventricular canal defects), right-sided valvular lesions, left-sided valvular lesions, complex cardiac anomalies, and aortopathies, to evaluate if there is a differential effect of pregnancy on the primary outcome when adjusting for lesion type in a sensitivity analysis., Results: Overall, 711 individuals were eligible for inclusion; 209 were parous and 502 nulliparous. People were classified according to the World Health Organization classification system with 86 (12.3%) being classified as class I, 76 (10.9%) being classified as class II, 272 (38.9%) being classified as class II to III, 155 (22.1%) being classified as class III, and 26 (3.7%) being classified as class IV. Aortic stenosis, bicuspid aortic valve, dilated ascending aorta or aortic root, aortic regurgitation, and pulmonary insufficiency were more common in parous individuals, whereas dextro-transposition of the great arteries, Turner syndrome, hypoplastic right heart, left superior vena cava, and other cardiac diagnoses were more common in nulliparous individuals. In multivariable modeling, pregnancy was associated with the composite adverse cardiac outcome (36.4%% vs 26.1%%; hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.66). Parous individuals were more likely to have unanticipated cardiac surgery (28.2% vs 18.1%; P=.003). No other individual components of the primary outcome were statistically different between parous and nulliparous individuals in cross-sectional comparisons. The association between pregnancy and the primary outcome was similar in a sensitivity analysis that adjusted for cardiac lesion type (hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.36)., Conclusion: Among individuals with congenital heart disease, pregnancy was associated with an increase in subsequent long-term adverse cardiac outcomes. These data may inform counseling of individuals with congenital heart disease who are considering pregnancy., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Determine incidence and risk factors for readmissions in early infancy., Study Design: Secondary analysis of data from the Cesarean Section Optimal Antibiotic Prophylaxis trial. All unplanned revisits (unplanned clinic, ER visits, and hospital readmissions) and hospital readmissions (initial discharge to 3-month follow-up) were analyzed., Results: 295 (15.9%) of 1850 infants had revisits with risk factors being ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.6 for Hispanic), maternal postpartum antibiotics (1.89), azithromycin treatment (1.22), small for gestational age (1.68), apnea (3.82), and hospital stay after birth >90th percentile (0.49). 71 (3.8%) of 1850 infants were readmitted with risk factors being antenatal steroids (aOR 2.49), elective repeat C/section (0.72), postpartum maternal antibiotics (2.22), O 2 requirement after delivery room (2.82), and suspected/proven neonatal sepsis (0.55)., Conclusion(s): Multiple risk factors were identified, suggesting potential impact on the neonatal microbiome (maternal postpartum antibiotics) or issues related to access/cost of care (Hispanic ethnicity associated with fewer revisits).

Objective: Hospital readmissions are increasingly tracked and assessed for value-based compensation. Our objective was to determine the incidence and risk factors associated with post-cesarean delivery (CD) readmissions or unexpected visits, defined as unexpected office or emergency room visits., Study Design: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for CD performed in laboring patients with viable pregnancies. Patients were followed up to 6 weeks postpartum. Our primary outcome was a composite of hospital readmission or unexpected visit, defined as unscheduled clinic or emergency department visits. Data of hospital readmissions, unexpected visits, and their reasons were collected. Demographics, antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum risk factors were evaluated in bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression modeling., Results: A total of 1,019 women were randomized to azithromycin and 994 to placebo. The prevalence of readmission or unexpected visit was 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9-11.6), with rates of 3.8% (95% CI: 3.0-4.7%) hospital readmissions, 6.9% (95% CI: 5.8-8.0%) emergency room visits, and 4.2% (95% CI: 3.4-5.2%) unexpected clinic visits. The most common causes were infectious disease and hypertensive disorder. Women with readmissions or unexpected visits were more likely to be obese and diabetic, as well as experience longer length of ruptured membranes, intrauterine pressure catheter placement, and postpartum fevers. On multivariable analysis, diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.4), prolonged ruptured membranes (aOR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.8), and postpartum fevers (aOR: 4.6, 95% CI: 3.0-7.0) were significantly positively associated with readmission or unscheduled visit, while azithromycin was a protective (aOR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9)., Conclusion: Women who had postpartum fever were at especially high risk for readmission or unexpected visits. Diabetes, prolonged ruptured membranes, and postpartum fevers were significantly associated with the adverse outcome, and azithromycin was associated with lower rates of readmission and unexpected visits., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Objective: Adding azithromycin to standard antibiotic prophylaxis for unscheduled cesarean delivery has been shown to reduce postcesarean infections. Because wound infection with ureaplasmas may not be overtly purulent, we assessed the hypothesis that azithromycin-based extended-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis also reduces wound complications that are identified as noninfectious., Study Design: This is a secondary analysis of the C/SOAP (Cesarean Section Optimal Antibiotic Prophylaxis) randomized controlled trial, which enrolled women with singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks who were undergoing nonelective cesarean. Women were randomized to adjunctive azithromycin or identical placebo up to 1 hour preincision. All wound complications occurring within 6 weeks were adjudicated into infection and noninfectious wound complications (seroma, hematoma, local cellulitis, and other noninfectious wound breakdown). The primary outcome for this analysis is the composite of noninfectious wound complications., Results: At a total of 14 sites, 2,013 women were randomized to adjunctive azithromycin ( n  = 1,019) or placebo ( n  = 994). Groups were similar at baseline. Although there was a lower rate of noninfectious wound complications in the azithromycin group compared with placebo (2.9 vs. 3.8%), this was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.22)., Conclusion: While adding azithromycin to usual antibiotic prophylaxis for nonelective cesarean delivery does reduce the risk of postcesarean infections, it did not significantly reduce the risk of postcesarean noninfectious wound complications., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Objective: To evaluate the association of institutional protocols for vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution and the surgical site infection rate in women undergoing cesarean delivery during labor., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery performed in laboring patients with viable pregnancies. The primary outcome for this analysis was the rate of superficial or deep surgical site infection within 6 weeks postpartum, as per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Maternal secondary outcomes included a composite of endometritis, wound infection or other infections, postoperative maternal fever, length of hospital stay, and the rates of hospital readmission, unexpected office visits, and emergency department visits., Results: A total of 523 women delivered in institutions with vaginal antisepsis policies before cesarean delivery and 1,490 delivered in institutions without such policies. There was no difference in superficial and deep surgical site infection rates between women with and without vaginal preparation (5.5% vs 4.1%; odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% CI 0.87-2.17), even after adjusting for possible confounders (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.43-1.73). The lack of significant benefit was noted in all other maternal secondary outcomes., Conclusion: Institutional policies for vaginal preparation before cesarean delivery were not associated with lower rates of surgical site infection in women undergoing cesarean delivery during labor.

Objective: The objective of this study is to examine perinatal outcomes associated with cholestasis of pregnancy according to bile acid level and antenatal testing practice., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of women with symptoms and bile acid testing from 2005 to 2014. Women were stratified by bile acid level: no cholestasis (<10 μmol/L), mild (10-39 μmol/L), moderate (40-99 μmol/L), and severe (≥100 μmol/L). The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity (hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, or death)., Results: 785 women were included; 487 had cholestasis (347 mild, 108 moderate, 32 severe) and 298 did not. After controlling for gestational age (GA), severe cholestasis was associated with the composite neonatal outcome (aRR 5.6, 95% CI 1.3-23.5) and meconium-stained fluid (aRR 4.82, 95%CI 1.6-14.2). Bile acid levels were not correlated with the frequency of testing (p = .50). Women who underwent twice weekly testing were delivered earlier (p = .016) than women tested less frequently, but the difference in GA was ≤4 d. Abnormal testing prompting delivery was uncommon. Among women with cholestasis, there were three stillbirths. One of these women was undergoing antenatal testing, which was normal 1 d prior to the fetal demise., Conclusion: Severe cholestasis is associated with neonatal morbidity which antenatal testing may not predict.

Background: Hypomethylated cell-free DNA from senescent placental trophoblasts may be involved in the activation of the inflammatory cascade to initiate labor., Objective: To determine the changes in cell-free DNA concentrations, the methylation ratio, and inflammatory markers between women in labor at term vs women without labor., Study Design: In this prospective cohort study, eligible participants carried a nonanomalous singleton fetus. Women with major medical comorbidity, preterm labor, progesterone use, aneuploidy, infectious disease, vaginal bleeding, abdominal trauma, or invasive procedures during the pregnancy were excluded. Maternal blood samples were collected at 28 weeks, 36 weeks, and at admission for delivery. Total cell-free DNA concentration, methylation ratio, and interleukin-6 were analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in methylation ratio in women with labor vs without labor. Secondary outcomes included the longitudinal changes in these biomarkers corresponding to labor status., Results: A total of 55 women were included; 20 presented in labor on admission and 35 presented without labor. Women in labor had significantly greater methylation ratio (P = .001) and interleukin-6 (P < .001) on admission for delivery than women without labor. After we controlled for body mass index and maternal age, methylation ratio (adjusted relative risk, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.68) and interleukin-6 (adjusted relative risk, 1.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.17) remained greater in women presenting in labor. Total cell-free DNA was not significantly different in women with labor compared with women without. Longitudinally, total cell-free DNA (P < .001 in labor, P = .002 without labor) and interleukin-6 (P < .001 in labor, P = .01 without labor) increased significantly across gestation in both groups. The methylation ratio increased significantly in women with labor from 36 weeks to delivery (P = .02)., Conclusion: Spontaneous labor at term is associated with a greater cell-free DNA methylation ratio and interleukin-6 compared with nonlabored controls. As gestation advances, total cell-free DNA concentrations and interleukin-6 levels increase. A greater methylation ratio reflects a greater maternal contribution (vs placental) in women with labor, likely resulting from greater levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and uterine activation proteins at the time of labor. Although not significant, women in labor had a greater total cell-free DNA concentration and thus could theoretically have more hypomethylated DNA available for interaction with the inflammatory cascade. Larger studies are needed to investigate this theory., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective  We aimed to evaluate which patient-level factors influence mode of delivery among candidates for operative vaginal delivery. Study Design  Cross-sectional study of candidates for operative vaginal delivery from 18 hospitals over 8 years. Probabilities of mode of delivery were estimated using hierarchical logistic modeling adjusting for clustering within physician and hospital. Results  Total 3,771 (64%) women delivered with forceps, 1,474 (25%) vacuums, and 665 (11%) cesareans. Odds of forceps versus vacuum were higher with induction (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.76-2.65), nulliparity (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.59-2.66), epidural (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.19-3.56), maternal indication (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.16-2.02), older maternal age (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06-1.31 per 5 years), and longer second stage (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20 per hour).Odds of cesarean versus operative vaginal delivery were higher with maternal indication (OR = 9.0, 95% CI: 7.23-11.20), a perinatologist (OR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.09-5.78), longer second stage (OR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.65-1.93 per hour), older gestational age (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20 per week), and longer labor (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04 per hour). Conclusion  Patient-level factors influence the decision to proceed with an operative vaginal delivery and the choice of instrument, thereby emphasizing the importance of maintaining availability of both forceps and vacuums., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Background: The significance of periconceptional nutrition for optimizing offspring and maternal health and reducing social inequalities warrants greater understanding of diet quality among US women., Objective: Our objective was to evaluate racial or ethnic and education inequalities in periconceptional diet quality and sources of energy and micronutrients., Design: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be cohort., Participants and Setting: Nulliparous women (N=7,511) were enrolled across eight US medical centers from 2010 to 2013., Main Outcome Measures: A semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire assessing usual dietary intake during the 3 months around conception was self-administered during the first trimester. Diet quality, measured using the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010), and sources of energy and micronutrients were the outcomes., Statistical Analyses: Differences in diet quality were tested across maternal racial or ethnic and education groups using F tests associated with analysis of variance and χ 2 tests., Results: HEI-2010 score increased with higher education, but the increase among non-Hispanic black women was smaller than among non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics (interaction P value <0.0001). For all groups, average scores for HEI-2010 components were below recommendations. Top sources of energy were sugar-sweetened beverages, pasta dishes, and grain desserts, but sources varied by race or ethnicity and education. Approximately 34% of energy consumed was from empty calories (the sum of energy from added sugars, solid fats, and alcohol beyond moderate levels). The primary sources of iron, folate, and vitamin C were juices and enriched breads., Conclusions: Diet quality is suboptimal around conception, particularly among women who are non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, or who had less than a college degree. Diet quality could be improved by substituting intakes of refined grains and foods empty in calories with vegetables, peas and beans (legumes), seafood, and whole grains., (Copyright © 2017 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify maternal clinical risk factors for postcesarean maternal infection in a randomized clinical trial of preincision extended-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis., Methods: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Patients were 24 weeks of gestation or greater and delivered by cesarean after a minimum of 4 hours of ruptured membranes or labor. All participants received standard preincision prophylaxis and were randomized to receive azithromycin or placebo. The primary outcome for this analysis is maternal infection: a composite outcome of endometritis, wound infection (superficial or deep), or other infections occurring up to 6 weeks postpartum. Maternal clinical characteristics associated with maternal infection, after controlling for azithromycin assignment, were identified. These maternal factors were included in a multivariable logistic regression model for maternal infection., Results: Of 2,013 patients, 1,019 were randomized to azithromycin. Overall, 177 (8.8%) had postcesarean maternal infection. In the final adjusted model, compared with the reference groups, women of black race-ethnicity, with a nontransverse uterine incision, with duration of membrane rupture greater than 6 hours, and surgery duration greater than 49 minutes, were associated higher odds of maternal infection (all with adjusted odds ratios [ORs] of approximately 2); azithromycin was associated with lower odds of maternal infection (adjusted OR 0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.3-0.6)., Conclusion: Despite preincision azithromycin-based extended-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis, postcesarean maternal infection remains a significant source of morbidity. Recognition of risk factors may help guide innovative prevention strategies., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT012235546.

Background  The aim of this study was to determine whether racial/ethnic differences in psychosocial measures, independent of economic status, exist among a large population of pregnant nulliparas. Methods  Between October 2010 and September 2013, nulliparous women at eight U.S. medical centers were followed longitudinally during pregnancy and completed validated instruments to quantify several psychosocial domains: Cohen Perceived Stress Scale, trait subscale of the Spielberger Anxiety Inventory, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Krieger Racism Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and the Pregnancy Experience Scale. Scores were stratified and compared by self-reported race, ethnicity, and income. Results  Complete data were available for 8,128 of the 10,038 women enrolled in the study. For all measures, race and ethnicity were significantly associated ( p  < 0.001) with survey scores. Non-Hispanic black (NHB) women were most likely to score in the most unfavorable category for all measures, with the exception of the Pregnancy Experience Scale. The magnitude of these differences did not differ by income status (interaction, p  > 0.05) except on the Krieger racism survey and the Edinburgh depression survey, which were exacerbated among NHB women with higher income (interaction, p  < 0.001). Conclusion  Significant racial/ethnic disparities, independent of income status, exist in psychosocial measures during pregnancy., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Background: The addition of azithromycin to standard regimens for antibiotic prophylaxis before cesarean delivery may further reduce the rate of postoperative infection. We evaluated the benefits and safety of azithromycin-based extended-spectrum prophylaxis in women undergoing nonelective cesarean section., Methods: In this trial conducted at 14 centers in the United States, we studied 2013 women who had a singleton pregnancy with a gestation of 24 weeks or more and who were undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or after membrane rupture. We randomly assigned 1019 to receive 500 mg of intravenous azithromycin and 994 to receive placebo. All the women were also scheduled to receive standard antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was a composite of endometritis, wound infection, or other infection occurring within 6 weeks., Results: The primary outcome occurred in 62 women (6.1%) who received azithromycin and in 119 (12.0%) who received placebo (relative risk, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.68; P<0.001). There were significant differences between the azithromycin group and the placebo group in rates of endometritis (3.8% vs. 6.1%, P=0.02), wound infection (2.4% vs. 6.6%, P<0.001), and serious maternal adverse events (1.5% vs. 2.9%, P=0.03). There was no significant between-group difference in a secondary neonatal composite outcome that included neonatal death and serious neonatal complications (14.3% vs. 13.6%, P=0.63)., Conclusions: Among women undergoing nonelective cesarean delivery who were all receiving standard antibiotic prophylaxis, extended-spectrum prophylaxis with adjunctive azithromycin was more effective than placebo in reducing the risk of postoperative infection. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; C/SOAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01235546 .).

Preterm birth (PTB) is a public health crisis in need of effective preventative strategies. Multi-disciplinary Neonatal Follow-up Programs (NFPs) provide health services to preterm infants at high risk for developmental problems after discharge from US newborn intensive care units. We aimed to determine whether NFPs are a potentially effective venue for specialized maternal counseling and intervention aimed at reducing the high rate of recurrent PTB in this population. This prospective case series enrolled women with preterm children evaluated in the Utah Department of Health NFP, 2010-2012. Women were interviewed, received Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) counseling services, and maternal and neonatal records were abstracted. We assessed maternal demographics, medical history, and characteristics of the index pregnancy. We calculated the proportion of women with knowledge of PTB recurrence risk and available prevention strategies, and assessed current contraceptive use and reproductive plans. Ninety-six women with a history of early PTB (≤26 weeks and/or birth weight < 1,250 g) were evaluated. Nearly 1 in 5 women (19.8 %) evaluated reported sexual activity, desire to avoid pregnancy, and no current contraceptive use, and were therefore at imminent risk of unintended pregnancy. Of women without permanent contraception, only 24.3 % were aware of their individual PTB recurrence risk. Of women with a history of spontaneous PTB, only 4 % were aware of effective pharmacologic preventative strategies. Introduction of MFM consultation as part NFP multi-disciplinary services is a novel approach with the potential to reduce recurrent PTB in an exceptionally high-risk population.

Objective: To create a simple tool for predicting the likelihood of successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) during the pregnancy after a primary cesarean delivery using variables available at the time of admission., Methods: Data for all deliveries at 14 regional hospitals over an 8-year period were reviewed. Women with one cesarean delivery and one subsequent delivery were included. Variables associated with successful VBAC were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Points were assigned to these characteristics, with weighting based on the coefficients in the regression model to calculate an integer VBAC score. The VBAC score was correlated with TOLAC success rate and was externally validated in an independent cohort using a logistic regression model., Results: A total of 5,445 women met inclusion criteria. Of those women, 1,170 (21.5%) underwent TOLAC. Of the women who underwent trial of labor, 938 (80%) had a successful VBAC. A VBAC score was generated based on the Bishop score (cervical examination) at the time of admission, with points added for history of vaginal birth, age younger than 35 years, absence of recurrent indication, and body mass index less than 30. Women with a VBAC score less than 10 had a likelihood of TOLAC success less than 50%. Women with a VBAC score more than 16 had a TOLAC success rate more than 85%. The model performed well in an independent cohort with an area under the curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.84)., Conclusions: Prediction of TOLAC success at the time of admission is highly dependent on the initial cervical examination. This simple VBAC score can be utilized when counseling women considering TOLAC., Level of Evidence: II., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Objective: Our aim was to compare good candidates for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) who underwent repeat cesarean to those who chose TOLAC., Study Design: Data for all deliveries at 14 regional hospitals over an 8-year period were reviewed. Women with a primary cesarean and 1 subsequent delivery in the dataset were included. The choice of elective repeat cesarean vs TOLAC was assessed in the first delivery following the primary cesarean. Women with ≥70% chance of successful vaginal birth after cesarean as calculated by a published nomogram were considered good candidates for TOLAC. Good candidates who chose an elective repeat cesarean were compared to those who chose TOLAC. Women who were delivered at 2 preselected tertiary centers by a general obstetrician-gynecologist practice were subanalyzed to determine whether there was an effect of physician group., Results: In all, 5445 women had a primary cesarean and a subsequent delivery. A total of 3120 women were calculated to be good TOLAC candidates. Of this group, 925 (29.7%) chose TOLAC. Women managed by a family practitioner or who were obese were less likely to choose TOLAC while women who were managed by a midwife or had a prior vaginal delivery were more likely to choose TOLAC. At the 2 tertiary centers, 1 general obstetrician-gynecologist group had significantly more patients who chose TOLAC compared to the other obstetrician-gynecologist physician groups (P < .001), with 63% of their patients choosing TOLAC., Conclusion: Less than one-third of the good candidates for TOLAC chose TOLAC. Managing provider influences this decision., (Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)