Search

Background: Achalasia is characterized as an esophageal motility disorder with incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Achalasia can be associated with abnormal peristalsis and symptoms of dysphagia, acid reflux, and chest pain. The exact pathophysiology of achalasia remains unclear, but it is hypothesized to be due to degeneration of the myenteric plexus. Case presentation: In this case, a 46-year-old Hispanic man presented to the emergency room with a 12-year history of progressive discomfort with swallowing solids and liquids. Due to many years of incomplete follow-up care and lack of understanding of the course of his disease, this patient's symptoms escalated to complete intolerance of oral intake and significant weight loss. He was diagnosed with achalasia during his hospital stay and treated successfully with laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Conclusions: This case discussion illustrates the importance of follow-up care and patient education so that diagnosis and treatment of achalasia are not delayed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) is a congenital malformation that occurs in about 1 in 2500-4000 live births. After surgical repair, despite the lack of evidence supporting the routine use of postoperative esophagram, most surgeons report obtaining an esophagram prior to enteral feeding. We hypothesized that abnormal indicators in vital signs, drain characteristics, and chest radiograph (CXR) could be used to screen for anastomotic leak, thus reducing the need for a routine esophagram. A single institution, retrospective chart review of all patients born with EA with or without TEF between 2009 and 2022 was performed. Vital signs, postoperative CXR, chest drain characteristics, and esophagram results were analyzed for patients who underwent repair. Forty-five patients who underwent EA/TEF repair were included in the study, and 40 patients had routine esophagram. Out of the twenty-two patients who had at least one abnormal indicator, 14 (64%) had an anastomotic leak. Seventeen patients (43%) had the absence of abnormalities of all three indicators, and none of these patients had an anastomotic leak (100% negative predictive value). Moreover, changes in drain characteristics and vital signs together presented high sensitivity (87.5%), specificity (90%), and negative predictive value (94%). In the absence of abnormalities in vital signs, CXR, and drain characteristics in patients undergoing EA/TEF repair, routine esophagram can be safely avoided prior to enteral feeding. Abnormalities in drain characteristics and vital signs together were highly sensitive and specific for anastomotic leak, thus potentially eliminating the need for routine CXR and thereby minimizing radiation exposure and cost. • Esophagram can be avoided post esophageal atresia repair if clear criteria are met. • The criteria involve vital signs, chest drain output, and chest radiograph. • Chest drain output is the most reliable independent predictor of anastomotic leak. • Abnormal drain character and vitals together were predictive of anastomotic leak. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The routine use of post-operative esophogram has come under evaluation for multiple upper GI surgeries such as with bariatric surgery and gastric resections. A major complication following Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a leak from the myotomy site. A post-operative contrast esophogram is often utilized to evaluate the presence of a leak, however it is not a standardized care practice for all patients. Presently it is selectively performed depending on physician assessment intra-operatively. This project will evaluate the necessity of post-operative contrast esophogram following POEM. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 277 patients diagnosed with achalasia who underwent POEM by two surgeons from 2011 to 2022. 173 patients met the inclusion criteria. A post-operative esophogram was used for the evaluation of a leak. Post-operative esophagram were selectively performed on day 1 following surgery using a water-soluble material. Data was evaluated using Stata. Results: There were 3 detected leaks in the group that underwent esophagrams compared to the non-esophagram group in the early post-operative period. The overall complication rate was 5.5% in the non-esophagram versus 7.9% in the esophagram group. Length of stay was 1.48 days in the non-UGI vs 1.76 days in the esophagram group. Readmission rate was 10.9% in non-esophagram versus 8.7% in esophagram group. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes in patients undergoing POEM who received post-operative esophagram verses patients who did not receive post-operative esophagram. The routine use of a contrast esophogram to detect a leak following POEM may not be justified. This study suggests that esophagrams should be performed depending on the clinical signs/symptoms post-operatively that would warrant imaging and intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Achalasia is characterized as an esophageal motility disorder with incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Achalasia can be associated with abnormal peristalsis and symptoms of dysphagia, acid reflux, and chest pain. The exact pathophysiology of achalasia remains unclear, but it is hypothesized to be due to degeneration of the myenteric plexus. Case presentation In this case, a 46-year-old Hispanic man presented to the emergency room with a 12-year history of progressive discomfort with swallowing solids and liquids. Due to many years of incomplete follow-up care and lack of understanding of the course of his disease, this patient’s symptoms escalated to complete intolerance of oral intake and significant weight loss. He was diagnosed with achalasia during his hospital stay and treated successfully with laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Conclusions This case discussion illustrates the importance of follow-up care and patient education so that diagnosis and treatment of achalasia are not delayed.

In patients with dysphagia that is not explained by upper endoscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is the next logical step in diagnostic testing. This study investigated predictors of failure to refer for HRM after an upper endoscopy that was performed for but did not explain dysphagia. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients >18 years of age who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for dysphagia from 2015 to 2021. Patients with EGD findings that explained dysphagia (e.g. esophageal mass, eosinophilic esophagitis, Schatzki ring, etc.) were excluded from the main analyses. The primary outcome was failure to refer for HRM within 1 year of the index non-diagnostic EGD. We also investigated delayed referral for HRM, defined as HRM performed after the median. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify risk factors that independently predicted failure to refer for HRM, conditioned on the providing endoscopist. Among 2132 patients who underwent EGD for dysphagia, 1240 (58.2%) did not have findings to explain dysphagia on the index EGD. Of these 1240 patients, 148 (11.9%) underwent HRM within 1 year of index EGD. Endoscopic findings (e.g. hiatal hernia, tortuous esophagus, Barrett's esophagus, surgically altered anatomy not involving the gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal varices) perceived to explain dysphagia were independently associated with failure to refer for HRM (adjusted odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.25–0.80). Of the 148 patients who underwent HRM within 1 year of index EGD, 29.7% were diagnosed with a disorder of esophagogastric junction outflow, 17.6% with a disorder of peristalsis, and 2.0% with both disorders of esophagogastric outflow and peristalsis. The diagnosis made by HRM was similar among those who had incidental EGD findings that were non-diagnostic for dysphagia compared with those who had completely normal EGD findings. Demographic factors including race/ethnicity, insurance type, and income were not associated with failure to refer for HRM or delayed HRM. Patients with dysphagia and endoscopic findings unrelated to dysphagia have a similar prevalence of esophageal motility disorders to those with normal endoscopic examinations, yet these patients are less likely to undergo HRM. Provider education is indicated to increase HRM referral in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Some achalasia patients exhibit esophageal contractile activity on follow‐up after treatment, yet its importance remains unclear. We aimed to identify factors associated with presence of contractility after treatment and to assess its impact on timed barium esophagram (TBE) and clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients with type I or II achalasia on baseline high‐resolution manometry (HRM) who completed HRM, TBE, and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) after treatment were retrospectively identified. Contractility was defined on post‐treatment HRM as presence of at least 1 supine swallow with DCI ≥100 mmHg s cm. Key Results: One hundred twenty‐two patients were included (mean age 48 ± 17 years, 50% female). At follow‐up evaluation after treatment (54% peroral endoscopic myotomy, 24% pneumatic dilation, 22% laparoscopic Heller myotomy), 61 (50%) patients had contractility on HRM. Patients with contractility (compared to those without) more frequently had type II achalasia (84% vs 57%, p = 0.001) and a post‐treatment normal EGJ opening classification on FLIP (69% vs 49%; p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with post‐treatment integrated relaxation pressure <15 mmHg and normal EGJ opening on FLIP (n = 53), those with contractility had a lower median column height on TBE at 1 min (4 vs 7 cm, p = 0.002) and 5 min (0 vs 5 cm, p = 0.001). In patients with "abnormal" EGJ metrics, patients with contractility showed lower symptom scores (median Eckardt score 2 vs 3, p = 0.03). Conclusions & Inferences: Occurring more frequently in type II achalasia, and if adequate EGJ opening is achieved after treatment, esophageal contractility may contribute to improved esophageal emptying and improved symptoms in non‐spastic achalasia. Preservation of esophageal body muscle could improve outcomes in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: A key unknown in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is the long-term course of esophageal stenosis. Our aim was to evaluate the course of esophageal strictures using structured serial esophagrams and determine predictors of diameter improvement in patients with EoE. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 78 EoE patients who completed 2 structured esophagrams at an academic tertiary referral center between 2003 and 2021. Maximum and minimum esophageal diameters were measured during esophagram using a standardized protocol to reduce measurement errors. Results: The median age at first esophagram was 36.2 (12.9–64.3) years; 60.3% of patients were male; 41 patients had active EoE; and 9 were inactive. Of the patients, 39.7% had allergic rhinitis, asthma (32.1%), and atopic dermatitis (7.7%). Medical therapies at second esophagram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy included proton pump inhibitors (39.5%), swallowed topical steroids (31.6%), diet elimination (13.2%), biologic therapies (1.3%), and clinical trial medications (1.3%). Median maximum diameter significantly increased by 1.0 mm (Q1: −1.0 mm, Q3: 3.0 mm) (P = .034), independent of dilation (P = .744). Increase was most profound in patients starting in the lowest maximum diameter group (9–15 mm) with median increase of 3.0 mm. For patients in disease remission at the second esophagram, there was a significant increase in maximum diameter per year compared to active disease at 0.8 mm (Q1: 0.0 mm, Q3: 5.3 mm) and 0.0 mm (Q1: −0.4 mm, Q3: 0.6 mm) respectively (P = .019). Conclusion: Long-term improvement in esophageal strictures in patients with EoE may occur but is modest and likely occurs over years. Progression also appears to be minimal. Continuous medical treatment may reduce the rate of stricture recurrence and may improve stricture diameter over time.

Purpose of Review: Radiological studies can be helpful when evaluating patients with suspect esophageal disorders. From benign strictures to malignancy and motility disorders such as achalasia, imaging modalities play a significant role in diagnosis. This review explores the role of different imaging modalities in the most frequently encountered esophageal pathologies. Recent Findings: Conventional barium esophagram has long been considered the primary imaging modality of the esophagus. In the same fashion, a timed barium esophagram is a valuable tool in the evaluation of achalasia and esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction. Over the last few decades there has been an increase in CT and MRI studies, which also play a role in the evaluation of esophageal pathologies. However, not infrequently, these newer imaging techniques can result in incidental esophageal findings. It is important that gastroenterologists appreciate the value of different modalities and recognize key imaging features. Summary: The diagnosis and management of esophageal disorders is evolving. A basic understanding of esophageal radiology is essential to any gastroenterologist caring for patients with esophageal complaints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophageal foreign body impaction requires urgent or emergent removal depending on clinical symptoms. Radiographic evaluation is extremely valuable in guiding management, although not required. The case presented herein describes a 66-year-old male presenting with epigastric pain and globus sensation for three days, inability to tolerate both foods and liquids, and regurgitation. Fluoroscopic evaluation revealed a food impaction in the distal esophagus. Urgent endoscopy confirmed the diagnosis and revealed a peptic stricture secondary to Barrett's esophagus. Although computed tomography has largely replaced the fluoroscopic examination, it can still provide a definitive diagnosis in many cases.

Objectives: To develop an expert consensus statement on the clinical use of swallowing fluoroscopy in adults that reduces practice variation and identifies opportunities for quality improvement in the care of patients suffering from swallowing impairment. Methodology: A search strategist reviewed data sources (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus) to use as evidence for an expert development group to compose statements focusing on areas of controversy regarding swallowing fluoroscopy. Candidate statements underwent two iterations of a modified Delphi protocol to reach consensus. Results: A total of 2184 publications were identified for title and abstract review with 211 publications meeting the criteria for full text review. Of these, 148 articles were included for review. An additional 116 publications were also included after reviewing the references of the full text publications from the initial search. These 264 references guided the authors to develop 41 candidate statements in various categories. Forty statements encompassing patient selection, fluoroscopic study choice, radiation safety, clinical team dynamics, training requirements, videofluoroscopic swallow study and esophagram techniques, and interpretation of swallowing fluoroscopy met criteria for consensus. One statement on esophagram technique reached near‐consensus. Conclusions: These 40 statements pertaining to the comprehensive use of swallowing fluoroscopy in adults can guide the development of best practices, improve quality and safety of care, and influence policy in both the outpatient and inpatient settings. The lack of consensus on some aspects of esophagram technique likely reflects gaps in knowledge and clinical practice variation and should be a target for future research. Laryngoscope, 133:255–268, 2023 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundMarijuana use has become more common since its legalization, as have reports of marijuana-associated spontaneous pneumomediastinum. Non-spontaneous causes such as esophageal perforation are often ruled out on presentation due to the severe consequences of untreated disease. Here we seek to characterize the presentation of marijuana-associated spontaneous pneumomediastinum and explore whether esophageal imaging is necessary in the setting of an often benign course and rising healthcare costs.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review was performed for all 18–55 year old patients evaluated at a tertiary care hospital between 1/1/2008 and 12/31/2018 for pneumomediastinum. Iatrogenic and traumatic causes were excluded. Patients were divided into marijuana and control groups.Results30 patients met criteria, with 13 patients in the marijuana group. The most common presenting symptoms were chest pain/discomfort and shortness of breath. Other symptoms included neck/throat pain, wheezing, and back pain. Emesis was more common in the control group but cough was equally prevalent. Leukocytosis was present in most patients. Four out of eight of computed tomography esophagarams in the control group showed a leak requiring intervention, while only one out of five in the marijuana group showed even a possible subtle extravasation of contrast but this patient ultimately was managed conservatively given the clinical picture. All standard esophagrams were negative. All marijuana patients were managed without intervention.DiscussionMarijuana-associated spontaneous pneumomediastinum appears to have a more benign clinical course compared to non-spontaneous pneumomediastinum. Esophageal imaging did not change management for any marijuana cases. Perhaps such imaging could be deferred if clinical presentation of pneumomediastinum in the setting of marijuana use is not suggestive of esophageal perforation. Further research into this area is certainly worth pursuing.

Introduction: Paraesophageal hernias (PEH) represent a small subset of all hiatal hernias. PEHs are often found incidentally during radiographic or endoscopic studies performed for another reason. While asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic PEHs can be safely observed with nonoperative management, the majority of patients with symptomatic PEHs will benefit from surgical repair, typically via a laparoscopic approach. The decision to pursue surgical repair of PEHs is dependent on a thorough evaluation of the patient's symptoms as well as an appropriate workup of the relevant anatomy. This study aims to review components of the clinical workup of PEHs. Materials and Methods: A review of the contemporary literature addressing the issue of diagnostic workup of patients with PEHs was performed. Information from available studies were collected and organized into a brief review format. Results: Two key principles of the diagnostic evaluation of patients with PEHs include (1) establishing a link between patient symptoms and the PEH, and (2) identifying abnormal anatomy or physiology that may impact surgical repair (e.g., Barrett esophagus, esophageal stricture or diverticulum, delayed gastric emptying). While a multitude of radiographic, endoscopic, and functional testing options are available to evaluate PEH, selection of the appropriate test is dependent on patient clinical presentation. Conclusion: Successful management of PEHs depends on a thorough evaluation of patient symptoms and hernia anatomy. Therefore, patients with PEHs should undergo a history and physical examination, upper endoscopy, and obtain radiographic evaluation of the PEH (e.g., barium esophagram, computed tomography scan). Further testing should be directed by patient symptoms, especially in the case of discordance between symptoms and imaging findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objectives The primary goal of this study was to examine how well findings of cervical esophageal stenosis on modified barium swallow (MBS) and esophagram correlate with clinical improvement following dilation in patients with a history of head and neck (H&N) cancer. Methods A retrospective review was performed at an academic hospital. The study population included H&N cancer patients with a history of neck dissection surgery who underwent esophageal dilation from 2010 to2018. Pre and postdilation swallowing function was assessed. The Functional Outcomes Swallowing Scale (FOSS) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) were used as outcome measures. Results The 95 patients were included. All patients had imaging prior to dilation. Post‐dilation FOSS and FOIS scores were significantly improved (P

Background: Anastomotic leaks (AL) are a major source of post-esophagectomy morbidity and patients are often initially asymptomatic. Debate exists on timing and utility of imaging to detect AL post-esophagectomy. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and timing of radiographic AL evaluation in esophageal cancer patients post-esophagectomy.Methods: A retrospective database of esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy at a single institution from 2004 to 2020 was used to determine the utilization, timing, and sensitivity of radiologic testing for AL post-esophagectomy.Results: Seventy-six patients were identified of which 37 (49%) had a cervical anastomosis. Sixty-four (84%) underwent 71 "asymptomatic radiographic leak tests" (ARLT), 7 of which had 2 different tests, including: 41 fluoroscopic esophagrams (58%), 18 CT-esophagrams (25%), and 12 upper GI studies (17%). Seventeen patients (22%) developed clinical signs of AL (hemodynamic instability, leukocytosis) and underwent "symptomatic radiographic leak tests" (SRLT) with fluoroscopic esophagram (n = 9, 12%), CT-esophagram (n = 7, 9%), or upper GI study (n = 1, 1%). ARLT and SRLT were positive in 2/64 (3%) and 17/17 (100%) patients, respectively, for 19 total ALs (25%). Among the 17 SRLT( +) patients, 1 was also ARLT( +), 13 were initially ARLT( -), and 3 were not evaluated by ARLT. The median postoperative day for ARLT and SRLT was 4.0 (IQR 3.0-5.5) and 9.0 days (IQR 6.0-13.0), respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.005). The sensitivity and specificity of ARLT for detecting AL were 13.3% and 100.0%, respectively.Conclusions: Based on the low ARLT sensitivity, routine use of imaging to detect asymptomatic ALs post-esophagectomy may be limited. Symptomatic ALs were often present in a delayed fashion, even after initial negative imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives/Hypothesis: Dysphagia is associated with increased mortality and healthcare costs. The modified barium swallow study (MBS) is the gold standard in assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia, but does not evaluate the esophagus. A barium esophagram can visualize the esophagus but does not evaluate the oropharyngeal swallow, nor does it utilize the expertise of speech and language pathologists. Providers may order one or both studies yet still risk missing critical pathology. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at an academic medical center between January 2016 and June 2019 focused on patients who had both MBS and esophagram as imaging for dysphagia evaluation. Analysis determined whether MBS and esophagram performed concomitantly improved diagnostic clarity. Results: A total of 5,183 patients underwent 6,066 swallow studies for dysphagia in the study period. Of which, 124 of these patients had concurrent MBS and esophagram. 10.5% of concurrent studies demonstrated a congruent negative evaluation. 59.7% of patients had an unremarkable MBS or esophagram paired with abnormal findings within the corresponding esophagram or MBS, respectively. 29.8% had both MBS and esophagrams that demonstrated an abnormality, but with unique pathologies identified by each study. In total, 85.1% of unremarkable MBS or esophagrams were paired with abnormal findings in the corresponding esophagram or MBS, respectively. Conclusion: Selection of diagnostic testing is variable among providers and may be influenced by healthcare systems. This analysis revealed that MBS and esophagrams provide unique diagnoses. Concurrent MBS and esophagrams may improve diagnostic accuracy, yet minimize additional studies. National practices around dysphagia diagnostics are inconsistent and would benefit from standardization. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:2666–2670, 2021 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula (rTEF) after esophageal atresia requires complex management across different specialties. This study reviews our experience and discusses a multidisciplinary (MDT) approach adopted in the past 4 years. We reviewed the medical records of 100 patients with rTEF managed by an MDT approach (post-MDT group) from 2016 to 2019. These cases were compared to a historical group of 35 patients with rTEF from 2012 to 2015 (pre-MDT group). Of the 135 patients with rTEF, 124 were referred from other hospitals. Preoperative examination found tracheomalacia in 23 patients, vocal fold immobility in 19 patients, and laryngomalacia in five patients. The incidence of postoperative anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, and repeat recurrences was 28.1%, 23.0%, and 8.9%, respectively. The overall mortality rate was 4.4%. No statistical difference in postoperative complications was noted between the two groups. The duration of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (P = 0.038), the duration of intubation (P = 0.049), the postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.011), and the total length of hospital stay (P = 0.001) were significantly lower in the post-MDT group. Mid-term follow-up showed 23 patients had pathological gastroesophageal reflux. Five of them underwent fundoplication and recovered. The MDT approach by fostering coordination of surgical, medical, radiological, and nutritional management is beneficial in the management of rTEF and leads to a satisfactory outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The primary goal of this study was to examine how well findings of cervical esophageal stenosis on modified barium swallow (MBS) and esophagram correlate with clinical improvement following dilation in patients with a history of head and neck (H&N) cancer. Methods: A retrospective review was performed at an academic hospital. The study population included H&N cancer patients with a history of neck dissection surgery who underwent esophageal dilation from 2010 to2018. Pre and postdilation swallowing function was assessed. The Functional Outcomes Swallowing Scale (FOSS) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) were used as outcome measures. Results: The 95 patients were included. All patients had imaging prior to dilation. Post‐dilation FOSS and FOIS scores were significantly improved (P <.001). In identifying the patients that would have improvement from dilation, esophagram and MBS had average sensitivities of 81% and 82%, respectively. The negative predictive value (ie, the ability of a normal esophagram or normal MBS to exclude patients that would not improve with dilation) was only 46% and 38%, respectively. When the specific finding of aspiration on MBS was considered, the positive predictive value (PPV) (ie, the ability of an MBS positive for aspiration to predict that a patient would benefit from dilation) was 87% (P =.03). When only the specific finding of stenosis on esophagram was considered, the PPV of improvement post‐dilation was 58% (P =.97). The delay in time from imaging to dilation was significantly longer in those who had an unidentified stenosis (false negative) on imaging when compared to those who did not (46.8 ± 35.2 days vs 312.6 ± 244.1 days, P <.001). Conclusion: In high risk patients for cervical esophageal stenosis, such as those with a history of H&N cancer and open neck surgery with or without radiation, MBS and esophagram appear to have mixed reliability as predictors of response to esophageal dilation. In these patients, a "negative" result on MBS and esophagram may not be diagnostically accurate enough to exclude patients from consideration of dilation. Level of Evidence: IIb [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives/Hypothesis: Prevertebral fascia invasion is a feature of advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) that predicts surgical futility. Magnetic resonance and computed topography imaging are used to identify prevertebral involvement, but reliable prediction remains a challenge. Our aims were to describe a new indication for esophagrams and assess its ability to detect prevertebral invasion preoperatively. Study Design: Retrospective Review. Methods: A retrospective review of advanced HPSCC patients from 2001 to 2019. Thirty‐one patients underwent curative treatment (21 surgically, 10 with chemoradiation) with a preoperative esophagram. Operative and pathology reports, and fluoroscopic images were collected from the medical record. Esophagrams were read independently by two blinded radiologists. Excursion of the laryngeal complex was quantified relative to the height of vertebral bodies; <0.5 bodies was considered positive for fixation. Surgery or comparative imaging modalities were the gold‐standard comparisons. Results: Mean age at diagnosis was 63 years. Twenty‐one patients underwent surgical treatment with laryngopharyngectomies. One patient had prevertebral invasion during surgical exploration. Ten patients underwent chemoradiation therapy, and three of these had prevertebral invasion. The average hyolaryngeal elevation was 1.05 vertebral bodies (standard deviation = 0.5). There was a strong correlation between radiologists (R = 0.80, P <.0001). Compared to the gold standard, esophagrams had sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 93%, positive predictive value of 60%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96%. Conclusions: This study highlights the utility of a common radiologic modality in assessing prevertebral fascia invasion in an advanced‐stage HPSCC cohort undergoing surgical treatment. With a high NPV and specificity, the esophagram's potential to rule out prevertebral fascia invasion is a useful predictor of resectability. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:800–805, 2021 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal dysmotility are common in patients with advanced lung disease (ALD) and are associated with worse outcomes. Assessing esophageal function in these patients is relevant for determining pulmonary transplant eligibility and prognosticating post-transplant outcomes. Barium Swallow (BaS) is a non-invasive testing modality often performed as a complement to formal esophageal function tests (EFTs), but its role and clinical utility in this context is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationship between BaS and EFTs with high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-h ambulatory pH-metry in patients with ALD. We performed a retrospective study of 226 consecutive patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplantation at a single center. All patients underwent EFTs and BaS independent of clinical history or symptoms per institutional protocol. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to evaluate the relationship between EFTs and BaS. Mucosal, reflux and motility findings were categorized. Abnormal motility was reported in 133 (59%) patients by BaS and 99 (44%) by HRM, with a significant difference in the proportions of patients with abnormal studies (p < 0.01). There were 7 (26%) patients with abnormal barium tablet passage who had normal HRM. The sensitivity (35%) and specificity (77%) for detecting pathologic reflux with BaS was poor. Inducibility of reflux and barium column height were not associated with pH-metry results. No clinically significant luminal irregularities were identified. In conclusion, while BaS can non-invasively assess esophageal mucosa, its findings are not associated with EFTs in patients with ALD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hiatal hernia (HH) is common in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Preoperative traditional techniques such as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) or barium swallow/esophagram do not always correlate with intraoperative findings. High-resolution manometry (HRM) has shown a higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional techniques in non-obese patients in the HH diagnosis, whereas there is a lack of data in the morbidly obese population. We aimed to prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of HRM in HH detection, in comparison with barium swallow and UGIE, assuming intraoperative diagnosis as a standard of reference.Methods: Forty-one consecutive morbidly obese patients prospectively recruited from a tertiary-care referral hospital devoted to bariatric and metabolic surgery underwent a preoperative evaluation including standardized GERD questionnaires, barium swallow, UGIE, and HRM. The surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was blinded to the results of other investigations.Results: HH was intraoperatively diagnosed in 11/41 patients (26.8%). In 10/11 patients, the preoperative HRM showed an esophagogastric junction suggestive of HH. When compared to intraoperative evaluation, the sensitivity of the HRM was 90.9% and the specificity 63.3%, with a positive predictive value of 47.6% and a negative predictive value of 95.0%. HRM showed a higher sensitivity and specificity compared to barium swallow and UGIE.Conclusions: HRM has a high accuracy of HH detection in morbidly obese patients assuming an intraoperative diagnosis as reference standard. It could therefore be a very useful tool in the preoperative work-up of obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We aim to review the imaging features of eosinophilic esophagitis on fluoroscopy and present how they can correlate with endoscopic and pathologic findings. Results: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated disease that results in esophageal dysfunction. Upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy is high yield and required for biopsies to demonstrate the hallmark histologic findings of eosinophil-predominant inflammation. While esophagogastroduodenoscopy is currently mandatory for diagnosis, imaging findings can provide valuable information regarding the structural and functional properties of the esophagus. In addition, fluoroscopic studies may be very helpful in the setting of subtle findings and to evaluate fibrotic remodeling changes. Conclusion: Radiologic examinations are a valuable tool in the assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis and can highlight changes of fibrostenotic disease, as overall narrowing can be more conspicuous fluoroscopically than endoscopically. As the disease increases in prevalence, it is critical that physicians recognize this condition and facilitate diagnosis and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophageal pneumatosis is a rare condition with diverse potential etiologies including traumatic, mechanical, ischemic, obstructive respiratory, autoimmune, immunodeficient, and infectious causes. Here, we present a case of esophageal pneumatosis in the setting of upper gastrointestinal and small bowel ileus, diagnosed on computed tomography (CT), with acute resolution after nasogastric tube decompression. A patient presented to the emergency department with epigastric discomfort. CT of the abdomen/pelvis demonstrated intramural air in the mid-to-distal esophagus, consistent with esophageal pneumatosis, and diffuse dilatation of the visualized esophagus, stomach, and small bowel, consistent with an ileus. Patient was managed with nasogastric tube decompression and bowel rest. Subsequent esophagram did not demonstrate any evidence of perforation and a repeat CT of the abdomen/pelvis, performed 11 hours after initial diagnostic CT, demonstrated interval resolution of patient's esophageal pneumatosis, and improvement of patient's ileus.

Background and Aims: A key unknown in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is the long-term course of esophageal stenosis. Our aim was to evaluate the course of esophageal strictures using structured serial esophagrams and determine predictors of diameter improvement in patients with EoE., Methods: This was a retrospective study of 78 EoE patients who completed 2 structured esophagrams at an academic tertiary referral center between 2003 and 2021. Maximum and minimum esophageal diameters were measured during esophagram using a standardized protocol to reduce measurement errors., Results: The median age at first esophagram was 36.2 (12.9-64.3) years; 60.3% of patients were male; 41 patients had active EoE; and 9 were inactive. Of the patients, 39.7% had allergic rhinitis, asthma (32.1%), and atopic dermatitis (7.7%). Medical therapies at second esophagram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy included proton pump inhibitors (39.5%), swallowed topical steroids (31.6%), diet elimination (13.2%), biologic therapies (1.3%), and clinical trial medications (1.3%). Median maximum diameter significantly increased by 1.0 mm (Q1: -1.0 mm, Q3: 3.0 mm) ( P  = .034), independent of dilation ( P  = .744). Increase was most profound in patients starting in the lowest maximum diameter group (9-15 mm) with median increase of 3.0 mm. For patients in disease remission at the second esophagram, there was a significant increase in maximum diameter per year compared to active disease at 0.8 mm (Q1: 0.0 mm, Q3: 5.3 mm) and 0.0 mm (Q1: -0.4 mm, Q3: 0.6 mm) respectively ( P  = .019)., Conclusion: Long-term improvement in esophageal strictures in patients with EoE may occur but is modest and likely occurs over years. Progression also appears to be minimal. Continuous medical treatment may reduce the rate of stricture recurrence and may improve stricture diameter over time., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the AGA Institute.)

This review summarizes the relevant literature for the initial imaging of patients with symptoms of dysphagia. For patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia who have an underlying attributable cause, a modified barium swallow is usually appropriate for initial imaging but for those who have unexplained dysphagia a fluoroscopic biphasic esophagram is usually appropriate. Fluoroscopic biphasic esophagram is usually appropriate for initial imaging in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients who have retrosternal dysphagia. For postoperative patients with dysphagia, fluoroscopic single-contrast esophagram and CT neck and chest with intravenous (IV) contrast are usually appropriate for oropharyngeal or retrosternal dysphagia occurring in the early postoperative period where water-soluble contrast is usually preferred rather than barium sulfate. In the later postoperative period (greater than 1 month), CT neck and chest with IV contrast and fluoroscopic single-contrast esophagram are usually appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Iatrogenic injuries to the upper gastrointestinal tract in neonates are rare but may lead to significant morbidity and mortality if undiagnosed. The clinical presentation of such injuries is usually nonspecific and symptoms may be overlooked, particularly in sick preterm neonates. Therefore, it is important to recognize the findings on plain chest radiographs obtained regularly in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) on intubated patients. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to describe the imaging findings of various iatrogenic injuries to the pharynx and esophagus in the neonatal period in a cohort of seven cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]