Search

Tongue pressure (TP) decreases significantly after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients (ECPs). Meanwhile, 2 weeks of gum-chewing training (GCT) significantly increased TP in healthy university students. We examined whether perioperative GCT would decrease the proportion of patients exhibiting a decline in TP at 2 weeks postoperatively, and prevent postoperative complications, in thoracic ECPs (TECPs). This was a single-center interventional study, and nonrandomized study with a historical control group (HCG). TECPs who underwent first-stage radical esophagectomy were recruited. Thirty-two patients of 40 in the gum-chewing group (GCG) were completed perioperative GCT in 3 times daily. Propensity score matching was performed with covariates related to TP including preoperative age, sex, body mass index, and the repetitive saliva swallowing test result, and yielded a matched cohort of 25 case pairs. Eleven GCG patients [44.0%] exhibited significantly lower TP at 2 weeks postoperatively than before esophagectomy was significantly fewer than that of 19 patients [76.0%] in the HCG. The median number of fever days (> 38 °C) in the 2 weeks after esophagectomy in the GCG was significantly fewer than those in the HCG. Perioperative GCT may prevent postoperative TP decline and postoperative dysphagia-related complications after esophagectomy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: The study aimed to examine the relationship between preoperative nutritional status, symptom burden, and the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma patients., Methods: The study, conducted in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at the Affiliated Huai'an No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, applied the NRS 2002, SGA and MSAS scoring systems as measures of nutritional status and symptom occurrence in patients diagnosed with ESCC. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate the association between nutritional scores, symptom scores, and postoperative complications., Results: The research found a significant correlation between high MSAS scores and postoperative atrial fibrillation. Patients with high symptom burden also tended to have nutritional risk or malnutrition according to the NRS2002 and SGA scores., Conclusion: There is a need for healthcare providers to pay attention to ESCC patients' physical and psychological symptoms. Close monitoring of nutritional status and timely nutritional interventions should be integrated into these patients' care plans as they have been found to be related to postoperative complications such as atrial fibrillation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The relationship between postoperative cumulative systemic inflammation and cancer survival needs to be investigated. We developed an approach to the prognostication of postoperative esophageal cancer by establishing low and high cut-off values for the C-reactive protein (CRP) area under the curve (AUC) at 7 and 14 days after esophagectomy., Methods: One hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients with biopsy-proven invasive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who underwent esophagectomies were evaluated. Postoperative CRP levels were analyzed for the first 14 days after surgery. The AUC on days 7 and 14 were calculated and compared with clinicopathological features and survival. The cut-off values for CRP at 7 days (CRP 7 d) and 14 days (CRP 14 d) were 599 mg/L and 1153 mg/L, respectively., Results: The patients in the low CRP 7 d group had significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), not that in the low CRP 14d group. The OS rates in the high CRP groups at PODs 1, 3, 10, and 14 were significantly lower than those in the low CRP groups. Postoperative complications were more common in the high CRP groups on PODs 3, 10, and 14. Univariate analyses revealed that pTNM stage, depth of tumor invasion, tumor location, lymph node involvement, and CRP 7 d were significant prognostic factors for both OS and RFS. The Cox proportional hazards model identified pTNM, tumor location, and CRP 7d as independent prognostic factors for the RFS and OS., Conclusions: Early prediction of patients with postoperative complications, and adequate management will suppress the elevation of CRP 7 d and further suppress the CRP value in the late postoperative period, which may improve the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

A high risk of complications still accompanies gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. In this narrative review, we summarize the technological progress and the problems of gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. Several types of gastric conduits exist, including the whole stomach and the narrow gastric tube. The clinical outcomes are similar between the two types of conduits. Sufficient blood supply to the conduit is mandatory for a successful esophageal reconstruction. Recently, due to the availability of equipment and its convenience, indocyanine green angiography has been rapidly spreading. When the blood perfusion of the planning anastomotic site is insufficient, several techniques, such as the Kocher maneuver, pedunculated gastric tube with duodenal transection, and additional microvascular anastomosis, exist to decrease the risk of anastomotic failure. There are two different anastomotic sites, cervical and thoracic, and mainly two reconstructive routes, retrosternal and posterior mediastinal routes. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference in outcomes between the anastomotic sites as well as the reconstructive routes. Anastomotic techniques include hand-sewn, circular, and linear stapling. Anastomoses using linear stapling is advantageous in decreasing anastomosis-related complications. Arteriosclerosis and poorly controlled diabetes are the risk factors for anastomotic leakage, while a narrow upper mediastinal space and a damaged stomach predict leakage. Although standardization among the institutional team members is essential to decrease anastomotic complications, surgeons should learn several technical options for predictable or unpredictable intraoperative situations., (© Crown copyright 2024.)

Surgery is pivotal in treating esophageal cancer; hybrid esophagectomy, which combines minimally invasive and open techniques, shows promising outcomes. This historical cohort study compared the surgical outcomes of standard open esophagectomy with hybrid esophagectomy. Overall, 58 patients who underwent either hybrid or open esophagectomy at the Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Oncology Clinic, Russia, from January 2015 to December 2023 were included. Data on demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The primary measures were overall complications and anastomotic leakage rates. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's Chi square test and t test via StatTech software (version 2.8.8). The number of removed lymph nodes was higher in the hybrid group (24±9) than in the open group (15±7) (P<0.001). In addition, the hybrid esophagectomy group showed significant reductions in operational time and blood loss (P<0.001 and P=0.014, respectively). The need for blood transfusion was higher in the open esophagectomy group (P=0.043). The postoperative length of stay in the hospital did not differ significantly between the two groups (open=20±8 days, hybrid=17±7 days, P=0.178). Cardiac complications were more frequent after an open esophagectomy (P=0.044). Hybrid esophagectomy reduced postoperative cardiac complications and other adverse events while maintaining satisfactory oncological outcomes. It had advantages over standard open esophagectomy in terms of lymphadenectomy, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion requirements, suggesting its efficacy for esophageal cancer patients., Competing Interests: None declared., (Copyright: © Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences.)

Repair of a paraconduit hernia post oesophagectomy can be challenging. We present a safe and effective method of left hiatoplasty which is feasible in the majority of cases, achieving primary no-mesh repair while protecting the gastric conduit. Operative photos and videos describe the technique and key considerations., (© 2024 The Author(s). ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Background: In the era of immunotherapy, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is used clinically but lacks of high-level clinical evidence. This study aimed to compare the safety and long-term efficacy of NAIC followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by MIE., Methods: A prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted at Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2 ) + cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 ) (toripalimab group) or paclitaxel + cisplatin alone (chemotherapy group) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. After surgery, the toripalimab group received toripalimab (240 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 months). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). The pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life were also assessed., Results: Between May 15, 2020 and August 13, 2021, 252 ESCC patients ranging from T1N1-3M0 to T2-3N0-3M0 were enrolled for interim analysis, with 127 in the toripalimab group and 125 in the chemotherapy group. The 1-year EFS rate was 77.9% in the toripalimab group compared to 64.3% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39 to 1.00; P = 0.05). The 1-year OS rates were 94.1% and 83.0% in the toripalimab and chemotherapy groups, respectively (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.97; P = 0.037). The patients in the toripalimab group had a higher pCR rate (18.6% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.001). The rates of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher morbidity were 9.8% in the toripalimab group and 6.8% in the chemotherapy group, with no significant difference observed (P = 0.460). The rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs did not differ between the two groups (12.5% versus 12.4%)., Conclusions: The interim results of this ongoing trial showed that in resectable ESCC, the addition of perioperative toripalimab to NAC is safe, may improve OS and might change the standard treatment in the future., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Communications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center.)

Background: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication after esophagectomy. BOTOX injections and pyloric surgeries (PS), including pyloroplasty (PP) and pyloromyotomy (PM), are performed intraoperatively as prophylaxis against DGE. This study compares the effects of pyloric BOTOX injection and PS for preventing DGE post-esophagectomy., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed Moffitt's IRB-approved database of 1364 esophagectomies, identifying 475 patients receiving BOTOX or PS during esophageal resection. PS was further divided into PP and PM. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared using Chi-Square, Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and ANOVA. Propensity-score matching was performed between BOTOX and PP cohorts., Results: 238 patients received BOTOX, 108 received PP, and 129 received PM. Most BOTOX patients underwent fully minimally invasive robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (81.1% vs 1.7%) while most PS patients underwent hybrid open/Robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (95.7% vs 13.0%). Anastomotic leak (p = 0.57) and pneumonia (p = 0.75) were comparable between groups. However, PS experienced lower DGE rates (15.9% vs 9.3%; p = 0.04) while BOTOX patients had less postoperative weight loss (9.7 vs 11.45 kg; p = 0.02). After separating PP from PM, leak (p = 0.72) and pneumonia (p = 0.07) rates remained similar. However, PP patients had the lowest DGE incidence (1.9% vs 15.7% vs 15.9%; p =  < 0.001) and the highest bile reflux rates (2.8% vs 0% vs 0.4%; p = 0.04). Between matched cohorts of 91 patients, PP had lower DGE rates (18.7% vs 1.1%; p =  < 0.001) and less weight loss (9.8 vs 11.4 kg; p =  < 0.001). Other complications were comparable (all p > 0.05). BOTOX was consistently associated with shorter LOS compared to PS (all p =  < 0.001)., Conclusion: PP demonstrates lower rates of DGE in unmatched and matched analyses. Compared to BOTOX, PS is linked to reduced DGE rates. While BOTOX is associated with more favorable LOS, this may be attributable to difference in operative approach. PP improves DGE rates after esophagectomy without improving other postoperative complications., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Second primary esophageal cancer often develops in patients with head and neck cancer, and esophagectomy in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is challenging. However, the clinical outcomes of these patients have yet to be examined in a multicenter setting., Methods: We evaluated the surgical outcomes of a nationwide cohort of 62 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with a history of TPL., Results: Ivor-Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies were performed in 32 (51.6%) and 30 (48.4%) patients, respectively. Postoperatively, 23 patients (37.1%) developed severe complications, and 7 patients (11.3%) required reoperation within 30 days. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 (21.0%) and 16 (25.8%) patients, respectively. Anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in the McKeown group than in the Ivor-Lewis group (46.7% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for anastomotic leakage in the McKeown group was 9.64 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.11-70.82, P = 0.008). Meanwhile, the 5-year overall survival rates were comparable between the groups (41.8% for Ivor-Lewis and 42.7% for McKeown), and the adjusted hazard ratio of overall survival was 1.44 (95% CI, 0.64-3.29; P = 0.381; Ivor-Lewis as the reference)., Conclusions: In our cohort, anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently after McKeown than Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, and almost half of patients in the McKeown group experienced leakage. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is preferred for decreasing anastomotic leakage when oncologically and technically feasible., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Esophageal Society.)

Background: Cough is a common symptom that affects patients' recovery and quality of life after esophagectomy. This study sought to investigate trends in postoperative cough and the factors that influence cough., Methods: A total of 208 of 225 patients were enrolled in this study. The Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire was administered the day before surgery and at three time points (1 week, 1 month, and 3 months) after esophagectomy to assess patient-reported outcomes., Results: All patients' LCQ-MC scores after surgery were lower than presurgery (P < 0.05), with the lowest score found 1 week after esophagectomy. Factors associated with a cough 1 week after surgery included clinical stage of cancer (OR 0.782, 95% CI 0.647-0.944, P = 0.011), anastomotic position (OR 1.241, 95% CI 1.069-1.441, P = 0.005), duration of surgery (OR 0.759, 95% CI 0.577-0.998, P = 0.049), and subcarinal lymph node dissection (OR 0.682, 95% CI 0.563-0.825, P < 0.001). Factors associated with a cough one month after surgery included clinical stage (OR 0.782, 95% CI 0.650-0.940, P = 0.009), anastomotic position (OR 1.293, 95% CI 1.113-1.503, P = 0.001), and maintaining a semi-reclining position (OR 1.440, 95% CI 1.175-1.766, P < 0.001). Factors associated with a cough 3 months after surgery were clinical stage (OR 0.741, 95% CI 0.591-0.928, P = 0.009) and anastomotic position (OR 1.220, 95% CI 1.037-1.435, P = 0.016)., Conclusions: This study showed that the factors influencing postoperative cough differed over time following esophagectomy. These results may warrant prospective intervention to better manage patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer to prevent postoperative cough., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The long-term outcomes of gastric tube cancer (GTC) are unclear. This study therefore aimed to clarify clinicopathologic features and the long-term outcomes of patients with GTC., Methods: The 25 patients who were diagnosed with GTC between April 2003 and December 2022 at our hospital were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study, and this included 27 lesions. We retrospectively evaluated clinicopathologic factors based on hospital records., Results: In our cohort, 88% of incidences of GTC were located in the middle or lower gastric tube. As the treatment of GTC, we used endoscopic submucosal dissection, gastrectomy, chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and best supportive care for 16 (59%), 6 (22%), 1 (4%), 1 (4%), and 3 (11%) lesions, respectively. Perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection was observed in 6 of the 16 lesions. Partial gastric tube resection was performed for 3 patients and total gastric tube resection was performed for 3 patients. One patient who underwent total gastric tube resection died due to acute respiratory distress syndrome. In survival analysis, the 3-year overall survival rate was 52% and the 3-year disease-specific survival rate was 74%. Five patients (20%) died of aspiration pneumonia, 2 patients (8%) of another disease, and 1 patient (4%) of another type of cancer. According to multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for overall survival were cN status (HR, 18.021; P =0.004) and complication of aspiration pneumonia (HR, 8.373; P =0.004)., Conclusions: The occurrence of aspiration pneumonia and cN status were prognostic factors after the treatment for GTC. Assessment of dysphagia and surveillance after treatment for GTC are important to improve the prognosis., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Hiatal hernia may development after esophagectomy or Gastrectomy. Post- esophago-gastric hiatal hernia is a rare but challenging condition. Nearly half of reported cases involve emergent situations, underscoring the urgency of addressing this condition. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment approach for this type of hernia., Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent repair for Post- esophago-gastric hiatal hernia over the past five years were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics and perioperative data were collected. The primary outcomes, repair methods, and surgical results following post-esophago-gastric hiatal repair were analyzed., Results: A total of eight patients with post-esophago-gastric hiatal hernia were included in this study. All patients presented with emergent conditions, specifically bowel obstruction. Laparoscopic repair was successful in four cases, with a conversion rate to open surgery of 50% (4 out of 8). Primary suture was performed in three cases, while biological mesh repair was carried out in four cases, and one case was left unrepaired. Bowel gangrene and perforation occurred in one case. The most notable postoperative complications included wound infection and pleural fluid collection. Importantly, there were no instances of hernia recurrence during the follow-up period, which ranged from 2 to 55 months, with a 100% follow-up rate observed., Conclusion: Post-esophago-gastric hiatal hernia is a rare yet significant condition, often presenting emergently and linked to higher morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, symptomatic patients warrant surgical repair, and immediate intervention should be provided to those with acute-onset symptoms and clinical signs of bowel obstruction. Primary suture repair, with or without biological mesh, appears to be a durable method of repair., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death after a major complication, is increasingly being used as a surrogate for assessing quality of care following major cancer resection. The aim of this paper is to determine the failure to rescue (FTR) rate after oesophagectomy and explore factors that may contribute to FTR within Australia., Methods: A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database from 2015 to 2023 at five Australian hospitals was conducted to identify patients who underwent an oesophagectomy. The primary outcome was FTR rate. Perioperative parameters were examined to evaluate predictive factors for FTR. Secondary outcomes include major complications, overall morbidity, mortality, length of stay and 30-day readmissions., Results: A total of 155 patients were included with a median age of 65.2 years, 74.8% being male. The FTR rate was 6.3%. In total, 50.3% of patients (n = 78) developed at least one postoperative complication with the most common complication being pneumonia (20.6%) followed by prolonged intubation (12.9%) and organ space SSI/anastomotic leak (11.0%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine any factors that were predictive for FTR however none reached statistical significance., Conclusion: This study is the first to evaluate the FTR rates following oesophagectomy within Australia, with FTR rates and complication profile comparable to international benchmarks. Integration of multi-institutional national databases such as ACS NSQIP into units is essential to monitor and compare patient outcomes following major cancer surgery, especially in low to moderate volume centres., (© 2024 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Background/aims: During esophagectomy for malignancy, the anterior and posterior branches of the vagus nerve are transected in order to achieve surgical radicality. This leads to loss of central nervous system-control of the pylorus which may lead to delayed gastric emptying. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of the EndoFLIP technique for assessment of pyloric biomechanical properties in patients undergoing esophagectomy., Methods: A feasibility study in six patients undergoing surgery was conducted. EndoFLIP measurements were carried out preoperative (Pre-op), after surgical resection (Post-op) and following prophylactic balloon dilatation of the pylorus (Post-dil). By measuring the cross-sectional area and pressure of the pylorus the pyloric compliance and the incremental pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep) were calculated., Results: Placing the catheter in the pyloric region was successfully achieved in all six patients. No complications were observed. Resection of the esophagus increased the incremental pyloric elastic modulus (Ep) from 0.59 ± 0.18 kPa to 0.99 ± 0.34 kPa ( p  = 0.03). After dilatation, the Ep was reduced to 0.53 ± 0.23 kPa ( p  = 0.04), which was close to Pre-op ( p  = 0.62). The pyloric compliance showed a similar pattern as that found for Ep., Conclusion: The EndoFLIP system holds promise for assessment of biomechanics of the pyloric region in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer.

We report a very rare case of delayed necrosis of the reconstructed colon 6 months after esophagectomy.A 67-year-old male patient had undergone esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer in 2014. Subsequently, total gastrectomy and ileo-colon reconstruction via a retrosternal route was performed for gastric tube cancer in 2022. Six months later, he suffered acute chest pain and came to our hospital. Contrast-enhanced CT showed severe dilation of the reconstructed colon with poor enhancement of the wall opposite mesentery, without arterial obstruction. Endoscopy showed no ischemic changes in the esophago-ileum anastomosis; however, mucosal color change to black was observed in the reconstructed colon. We diagnosed ischemic colitis of the reconstructed colon and started conservative treatment; however, 18 days later, he developed a right pyothorax due to perforation of the reconstructed colon. We performed necrosed colectomy with right chest drainage and cervical esophageal fistula was made. Histopathological examination revealed mucosal detachment, thinning of the muscularis propria, and ghost-like appearance of crypt. If necrosis of the reconstructed colon is suspected in the late postoperative period, endoscopic findings of the colonic mucosa may be useful in determining surgical treatment, even in the absence of arterial blood flow obstruction., (© 2024. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Radical esophagectomy, including thoracic duct resection (TDR), has been proposed to improve regional lymphadenectomy and possibly reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence. However, because of its impact on immunoregulation, some authors have expressed concerns about its possible detrimental effect on long-term survival. The purpose of this review was to assess the influence of TDR on long-term survival., Patients and Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched through 15 March 2024. Overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were primary outcomes. Restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), risk ratio (RR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology was employed to evaluate the certainty of evidence., Results: The analysis included six studies with 5756 patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy. TDR was reported in 49.1%. Patients' ages ranged from 27 to 79 years and 86% were males. At 4-year follow-up, the multivariate meta-analysis showed similar results for the comparison noTDR versus TDR in term of OS [- 0.8 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 3.1, 1.3], CSS (0.1 months, 95% CI - 0.9, 1.2), and DFS (1.5 months, 95% CI - 2.6, 5.5). TDR was associated with a significantly higher number of harvested mediastinal lymph nodes (SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.01-1.13) and higher risk of postoperative chylothorax (RR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.04-2.23). Anastomotic leak and pulmonary complications were comparable., Conclusions: TDR seems not to improve long-term OS, CSS, and DFS regardless of tumor stage. Routine TDR should not be routinely recommended during esophagectomy., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing interests.

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with decreased postoperative complications compared with open esophagectomy. However, the risks of complications for minimally invasive esophagectomy compared with open esophagectomy may be affected by operative time. The objectives of this study are to (1) compare the incidence of postoperative complications for minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy and (2) evaluate the association of postoperative complications on operative approach and operative time., Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent an esophagectomy in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Procedure-Targeted Data File was performed from 2016 to 2020. For analysis, minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy were stratified into tertiles of operative time. A bivariate analysis of postoperative complications comparing minimally invasive esophagectomy with open esophagectomy was performed. Multivariable Poisson regression models were estimated evaluating the association of the likelihood of postoperative complications with operative approach and operative time., Results: In total, 8,574 patients who underwent esophagectomy were included: 5,369 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy, and 3,205 patients underwent open esophagectomy. Median operative time was 402 minutes for minimally invasive esophagectomy and 321 minutes for open esophagectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality was lower in the minimally invasive esophagectomy group than the open esophagectomy group within the same tertiles of operative time. When we compared patients who underwent short open esophagectomy with those who underwent long minimally invasive esophagectomy, there were no significant differences in complications., Conclusion: There is no significant association of postoperative complications for short open esophagectomy compared with long minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients should be selected for minimally invasive esophagectomy when there is appropriate surgeon experience and hospital resources., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The aim of this study was to determine perioperative risk factors associated with anastomotic leak (AL) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and its association with cancer recurrence and overall survival., Methods: This retrospective observational study of electronic health record data included patients who underwent MIE for esophageal cancer between September 2013 and July 2023 at a tertiary center. The primary outcome was AL after esophagectomy, whereas the secondary outcomes included time to cancer recurrence and overall survival. Perioperative patient factors were evaluated to determine their associations with the primary and the secondary outcomes. Propensity score-matched logistic regression assessed the associations between perioperative factors and AL. Kaplan-Meier survival curves compared cancer recurrence and overall survival by AL., Results: A total of 251 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer were included in the analysis; 15 (6%) developed AL. Anemia, hospital complications, hospital length of stay, and 30-day readmissions significantly differed from those with and without AL (P = .037, <.001, <.001, and.016, respectively). Moreover, 30- and 90-day mortality were not statistically affected by the presence of AL (P = .417 and 0.456, respectively). Logistic regression modeling showed drug history and anemia were significantly associated with AL (P = .022 and.011, respectively). The presence of AL did not significantly impact cancer recurrence or overall survival (P = .439 and.301, respectively)., Conclusion: The etiology of AL is multifactorial. Moreover, AL is significantly associated with drug history, preoperative anemia, hospital length of stay, and 30-day readmissions, but it was not significantly associated with 30- or 90-day mortality, cancer recurrence, or overall survival. Patients should be optimized before undergoing MIE with special consideration for correcting anemia. Ongoing research is needed to identify more modifiable risk factors to minimize AL development and its associated morbidity., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Our aim was to evaluate the influence of staged goal directed therapy (GDT) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), intraoperative hemodynamics and oxygenation in patients undergoing Mckeown esophagectomy., Methods: Patients were randomly divided into three groups, staged GDT group (group A, n = 56): stroke volume variation (SVV) was set at 8-10% during the one lung ventilation (OLV) stage and 8-12% during the two lung ventilation (TLV) stage, GDT group (group B, n = 56): received GDT with a target SVV of 8-12% During the entire surgical procedure, and control group (group C, n = 56): conventional fluid therapy was administered by mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), and urine volume. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications within Postoperative days (POD) 7. The secondary outcomes were postoperative lung ultrasound (LUS) B-lines artefacts (BLA) scoring, incidence of other complications, the length of hospital stay, intraoperative hemodynamic and oxygenation indicators included mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), cardiac output (CO), oxygenation index (OI), respiratory indices (RI), alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (Aa-DO 2 )., Results: Patients in group A and group B had a lower incidence of PPCs (7/56 vs. 17/56 and 9/56 vs. 17/56, p < 0.05), and a fewer B-lines score on postoperative ultrasound (4.61 ± 0.51 vs. 6.15 ± 0.74 and 4.75 ± 0.62 vs. 6.15 ± 0.74, p < 0.05) compared to group C. The CI, CO, MAP, and OI were higher in group A compared to group B and group C in the stage of thoracic operation. During the abdominal operation stage, patients in group A and group B had a better hemodynamic and oxygenation indicators than group C., Conclusions: In comparison to conventional fluid therapy, intraoperative staged GDT can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing McKeown esophagectomy, facilitating patient recovery. Compared to GDT, it can improve intraoperative oxygenation and stabilize intraoperative hemodynamics in patients., Trial Registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 24/11/2021 (ChiCTR2100053598)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: During esophagectomy, evaluation of blood supply to the gastric tube is critically important to estimate and avoid anastomotic complications. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography during esophagectomy and postoperative endoscopy findings, especially mucosal color change., Methods: This study retrospectively collected data from 86 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy and reconstruction using a gastric tube for esophageal cancer at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University between 2017 and 2020. The flow speed of ICG fluorescence in the gastric tube was evaluated during the operation. Additionally, the main root of ICG enhancement and pattern of ICG distribution in the gastric tube were evaluated. On postoperative day 1 (POD1), the change in the mucosal color to white, thought to reflect ischemia, or black, thought to reflect congestion of the proximal gastric tube, was evaluated. The correlations between these factors, clinical parameters, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses used logistic regression to identify the risk factors affecting mucosal color change., Results: Multivariate analyses revealed that the only independent significant predictor of mucosal congestion on POD1 was the ICG enhancement time of the right gastric tube tip (odds ratio, 14.49; 95% confidential interval, 2.41-87.24; P = 0.004)., Conclusions: This study indicated that the ICG enhancement time is related to venous malperfusion and congestion rather than arterial malperfusion and ischemia., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Intrathoracic herniation of the gastric tube pulled up through the retrosternal route after oesophagectomy is relatively rare and usually can be managed by conservative treatment.We present two patients who needed reoperation for intrathoracic herniation of gastric tube after minimally invasive oesophagectomy for thoracic oesophageal cancer. Postoperatively, both patients showed herniation and acute twist of the gastric tube. Due to the twist of the gastric tube, one patient had ischaemic change of the proximal tip of the gastric tube, and the other patient showed delayed gastric emptying, both of which led to surgical repairs. In this case report, we discuss why the herniation of gastric tube from the retrosternal route occurs, how to decide to do reoperation and how to prevent this complication., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Esophageal cancer is currently one of the high-risk malignant tumors worldwide, posing a serious threat to human health. This study aimed to analyse the causes of postoperative mortality and intrathoracic anastomotic leakage(IAL) after esophagectomy., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 patients with esophageal cancer resection and focused on the preoperative and postoperative indicators. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors affected IAL and evaluated the potential factors on postoperative mortality. The Kaplan-Meier curve was applied to evaluate the effect of leakage on postoperative mortality after propensity score matching., Results: Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that infection and high BMI were significant risk factors for IAL, patients with BMI over 24 kg/m 2 in IAL group was two times higher than that of the group without IAL (95% CI = 1.01-6.38; P = 0.048). When patients were infected, the hazard ratios(HRs) of anastomotic leakage was twice that of patients without infection (95% CI = 1.22-4.70; P = 0.011). On the other hand, IAL was a significant cause of postoperative mortality, the 40-day postoperative mortality rate in the leakage group was significantly higher than the non leakage group (28.95% in leakage group vs. 7.46% in non leakage group, P<0.01). After propensity score matching, IAL still significantly affected postoperative mortality. The total length of hospital stay of the leakage group was inevitably longer than that of the non leakage group (22.19 ± 10.79 vs. 15.27 ± 8.59)., Conclusion: IAL was a significant cause of death in patients underwent esophageal cancer resection. Patients with high BMI over 24 kg/m 2 and infection may be more prone to developing IAL after esophagectomy. IAL inevitably prolonged the length of hospital stay and increased postoperative mortality., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

To evaluate the efficacy and postoperative complications of endoscopic thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy compared to open surgery in esophageal cancer treatment. This retrospective study included 103 esophageal cancer patients admitted from August 2018 to March 2022, divided into observation (endoscopic surgery) and control (open surgery) groups. We compared intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, immune function, and one-year overall survival (OS). Intraoperative bleeding volume, the retention time of chest tube, postoperative fasting time, and hospital stay in the observation group were smaller than those in the control group (P < .05). The differences were not statistically significant (P > .05) when comparing operative time, the number of intraoperative blood transfusion cases, and the rate of operating room extubation in these 2 groups. The differences were not statistically significant when comparing the amount of resected lymph nodes and the positive rate of incisal edge in these 2 groups (P > .05). There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rates such as pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism, anastomotic fistula, the leakage of thoracic duct, the injury of RLN and arrhythmia in these 2 groups (P > .05). At 7 days postoperatively, the CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the observation group and the control group were smaller than the preoperative ones in their same groups, and they were larger in the observation group than those in the control group (P < .05); There was no statistically significant difference on the CD8+ in the observation group and the control group at 7 days postoperatively compared with the preoperative ones in their same groups (P > .05). The 1-year postoperative OS rate was 81.63% (40/49) in the observation group and 72.22% (39/54) in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant when comparing the OS rates of these 2 groups (P = .238, HR = 0.622, 95% CI = 0.279-1.385). Endoscopic thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy offers less invasive treatment with significant short-term benefits and better preservation of immune function in esophageal cancer patients, making it a safe and effective surgical option., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: The purpose of the study is to examine if prolonged thromboprophylaxis decreases the risk of thrombosis after intended curative surgery for oesophageal cancer. Study results are expected to inform a guideline for thromboprophylaxis after oesophageal cancer surgery. The perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this critically ill patient group. Thrombosis is the second-most common cause of cancer death after the cancer itself. The risk of thrombosis depends on the cancer type, and upper gastrointestinal cancers are considered high risk. This risk is further increased when patients undergo surgery. However, only few studies have investigated the peri- and postoperative coagulation profile in oesophageal cancer patients. Due to this lack of knowledge, prophylaxis is currently restricted to 5000 IU (international units) low-molecular weight heparin daily from surgery until discharge from hospital (approximately 10 days), whereas patients with gastric cancer receive 30 days of treatment. The present study examines whether a 30-day treatment is superior and safe, compared with the current standard treatment., Methods: The study is a randomised controlled trial. Inclusion is ongoing, and we aim to include 100 patients. Blood samples are drawn before and after surgery, and the coagulation is extensively examined. The primary endpoint is the difference in plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) 30 days after surgery between the intervention and the standard group. Furthermore, patients are examined with ultrasound to screen for asymptomatic venous thrombotic events (VTE). Secondary endpoints are incidence of bleeding, symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE and mortality 30 days 1 one year after surgery., Discussion: The study will provide valuable information on the perioperative coagulation profile and VTE risk of oesophageal cancer patients. The study seeks to aid in optimising the postoperative thromboprophylaxis, and the perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this at-risk patient population., Trials Registration: The trial was prospectively registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register with ID 2021-001335-24 on 30 June 2021 and at ClinicalTrials.gov with study identifier NCT05067153., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the safety and feasibility of single-intercostal totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIIE) with those of multiple-intercostal MIIE., Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2022, clinical data were collected for 528 patients who successfully underwent totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. Among these patients, 294 underwent MIIE, with 200 undergoing the single-intercostal approach and 94 undergoing the multiple-intercostal approach. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to the cohort of 294 patients. Subsequently, perioperative outcomes and other pertinent clinical data were analyzed retrospectively., Results: A total of 294 patients were subjected to PSM, and 89 groups of patient data (178 persons in total) were well balanced and included in the follow-up statistics. Compared to the multiple intercostal group, the single intercostal group had a shorter operative time (280 min vs. 310 min; p < 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the incidence of major perioperative complications (p > 0.05). The total number of lymph nodes sampled (25.30 vs. 27.55, p > 0.05) and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes sampled on the both sides (p > 0.05) did not significantly differ. The single intercostal group had lower postoperative long-term usage of morphine (0,0-60 vs. 20,20-130; p < 0.01), total temporary addition (10,0-30 vs. 20,20-40; p < 0.01) and temporary usage in the first 3 days after surgery (0,0-15 vs. 10,10-20; p < 0.01) than did the multicostal group.There were no significant differences in age, sex, tumor location or extent of lymphadenectomy or in the clinical factors between the single-intercostal group (p > 0.05)., Conclusions: Both techniques can be used for the treatment of esophageal cancer. Compared to multiple intercostal MIIE, the feasibility of which has been proven internationally, the single intercostal technique can also be applied to patients of different age groups and sexes and with different tumor locations. It can provide surgeons with an additional surgical option., Trial Registration: This study was retrospectively registered by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and written informed consent was exempted from ethical review. The registration number was 20,230,326. The date of registration was 2023.03.26., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: Objective: This study explores how permissive hypercapnia, a key aspect of lung-protective ventilation, impacts postoperative delirium in elderly patients following thoracic surgery. Methods: A single-center trial at The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University involved 136 elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophageal cancer resection. Randomly assigned to maintain PaCO 2 35-45 mm Hg (group N) or 46-55 mm Hg (group H). Primary outcome: postoperative delirium (POD) incidence 1-3 days post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included monitoring rSO 2 , cardiovascular parameters (MAP, HR), pH, OI, and respiratory parameters (VT, RR, Cdyn, PIP) at specific time points. Perioperative tests assessed CRP/ALB ratio (CAR) and systemic inflammatory index (SII). VAS scores were documented for 3 postoperative days. Results: Postoperatively, group H showed significantly lower POD incidence than group N (7.4% vs. 19.1%, P = 0.043). Group H exhibited higher PaCO 2 and rSO 2 during surgery ( P < 0.05). Patients in group H maintained better cardiovascular stability with higher blood pressure and lower heart rate on T2-4 ( P < 0.05). Respiratory parameters were more stable in group H with lower TV, RR, and PIP, and higher Cdyn during OLV ( P < 0.05). Group H had lower pH and higher OI at T2-4 ( P < 0.05). CRP and CAR levels rose less in group H on the first day and 1 week later ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: Maintaining PaCO 2 at 46-55 mm Hg reduces POD incidence, possibly by enhancing rSO 2 levels and stabilizing intraoperative respiration/circulation., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the Shock Society.)

Objective: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe complications after esophagectomy. However, a diagnostic gold standard for anastomotic leakage has not been established yet. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the potential use of routine postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography findings as an early predictor of anastomotic leakage in patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer., Methods: This study included 75 patients who underwent Mckeown esophagectomy, of whom 22 developed anastomotic leakage after surgery. The computed tomography findings for this patient cohort were categorized into 3 grades based on mural enhancement patterns observed at the anastomotic site. Both semiquantitative and quantitative analyses were performed, and the interobserver agreement between the 2 experienced radiologists was assessed., Results: It was found that poor enhancement in both the early and portal venous phases (grade 2) had a robust association with the occurrence of anastomotic leakage. The computed tomography enhancement ratio that is used to estimate wall degeneration and ischemia was significantly higher in patients with anastomotic leakage., Conclusions: Routine postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography could be beneficial for the early detection of anastomotic leakage, even in asymptomatic patients, after esophagectomy., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Currently, mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy (MAE) and thoracoscope-assisted esophagectomy (TAE) represent two prevalent forms of minimally invasive esophagectomy extensively employed in the management of esophageal cancer (EC). The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess and compare these two surgical approaches concerning perioperative outcomes and long-term survival, offering valuable insights for refining surgical strategies and enhancing patient outcomes in this field., Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CNKI databases until 1 March 2024, for studies comparing MAE and TAE. Outcomes of interest included perioperative outcomes (intraoperative outcomes, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications) and survival rates. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, with heterogeneity dictating the use of fixed or random-effects models., Results: A total of 21 relevant studies were finally included. MAE was associated with significantly shorter operation times [mean difference (MD)=-59.58 min, 95% CI: -82.90 to -36.26] and less intraoperative blood loss (MD=-68.34 ml, 95% CI: -130.45 to -6.23). However, MAE resulted in fewer lymph nodes being dissected (MD=-3.50, 95% CI: -6.23 to -0.78). Postoperative recovery was enhanced following MAE, as evidenced by reduced hospital stays and tube times. MAE significantly reduced pulmonary complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.59, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.81] but increased the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.60). No significant differences were observed in anastomotic leakage, chylothorax, cardiac complications, wound infections, and gastric retention between MAE and TAE. The long-term survival outcomes showed no statistical difference [hazard ratio (HR)=1.05, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.54]., Conclusions: MAE offers advantages in reducing operation time, blood loss, and specific postoperative complications, particularly pulmonary complications, with a shorter recovery period compared to TAE. However, it poses a higher risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and results in fewer lymph nodes being dissected. No difference in long-term survival was observed, indicating that both techniques have distinct benefits and limitations. These findings underscore the need for personalized surgical approaches in EC treatment, considering individual patient characteristics and tumor specifics., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

The overall frequency of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal and gastric cancer diverges between studies. We evaluated the frequency and assessed the relationship between complications and demographic and clinical features. For this observational study, data were extracted from the ERAS Registry managed by the University of Verona, Italy. Patients were evaluated and compared for postoperative complications according to the consensus-based classification and the Clavien-Dindo scale. The study population was 877 patients: 346 (39.5%) with esophageal and 531 (60.5%) with gastric cancer; 492 (56.2%) reported one or more postoperative complications, 213 (61.6%) of those with esophageal and 279 (52.5%) of those with gastric cancer. When stratified by consensus-based classification, patients with esophageal cancer reported general postoperative complications more frequently (p < 0.001) than those with gastric cancer, but there was no difference in postoperative surgical complications between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression models revealed an association between postoperative complications and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.36), operation time (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% CI 1.00-1.15), and days to solid diet intake (adjusted OR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.20-1.59). Complications in patients with esophageal and gastric cancer are frequent, even in those treated according to ERAS principles, and are often associated with comorbidities, longer operative time, and longer time to solid diet intake., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Anastomotic leakage in esophageal cancer surgery may be reduced by evaluating the blood flow to the reconstructed organ, but quantitative evaluation of arterial and venous blood flow is difficult. This study aimed to quantitatively assess blood flow using a new technique, as well as determine the relationship between the blood flow in the gastric tube and anastomotic leakage using near-infrared spectroscopy., Methods: This single-center, observational study included 50 patients aged 51-82 years who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer between June 2022 and January 2023. Regional tissue oxygen saturation was measured at the antrum (point X), the anastomotic point (point Z), and the midpoint between points X and Z (point Y) before and after gastric tube formation. These three points of oxygen saturation were investigated in relation to anastomotic leakage., Results: When comparing the presence of leakage to its absence, regional tissue oxygen saturation at points X and Z after gastric tube formation was significantly lower (X: p = 0.03, Z: p = 0.02), with the decreasing rate significantly higher at point Z (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the decreasing rate of regional tissue oxygen saturation between points X and Y (X: p = 0.052, Y: p = 0.83)., Conclusion: Regional tissue oxygen saturation levels may be useful for measuring blood flow and could be a predictor of anastomotic leakage., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background/aim: Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (EC) is known to lead to deterioration of respiratory function (RF) due to thoracotomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of transmediastinal esophagectomy (TME) on pulmonary function., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 102 patients with EC who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) or TME and underwent RF tests within three months postoperatively at Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine between 2014 and 2022. Perioperative pulmonary functions were evaluated based on vital capacity (VC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0)., Results: Among 102 patients undergoing esophagectomy, 12 (11.8%) patients were included in the TTE group, and the remaining 90 (88.2%) patients were included in the TME group. Neoadjuvant treatments were significantly more common in the TTE group (p=0.011), with more advanced tumor stages (p=0.017). The TME group had significantly lower estimated blood loss (p=0.015). RF after esophagectomy showed a decrease in VC, and VC of predicted (%VC). The decrease rate in VC, %VC, and FEV1.0 was significantly greater in the TTE group than in the TME group., Conclusion: TME is a surgical procedure with a less severe postoperative decline in RF than TTE., (Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Enteral nutrition is the preferred mode of nutrition following esophagectomy. However, the preferred mode of enteral nutrition (feeding jejunostomy (FJ) vs. nasojejunal (NJ) tube) remains contentious. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we compared FJ with NJ tube feeding in terms of safety, feasibility, efficacy, and quality-of-life (QOL) parameters in Indian patients undergoing trans-hiatal esophagectomy (THE) for carcinoma esophagus., Materials and Methods: This single-center, two-armed (FJ and NJ tube), non-inferiority RCT was conducted from March 2020 to January 2024. Forty-eight patients underwent THE with posterior-mediastinal-gastric pull-up and were randomized to NJ and FJ arms (24 in each group). The postoperative complications, catheter efficacy, and QOL parameters were compared between the two groups till the 6-week follow-up., Results: In this RCT, we found no significant difference in the occurrence of catheter-related complications, postoperative complication rate, catheter efficacy, and visual analog pain scores between patients with NJ tube and FJ, following THE for esophageal cancer. There was a significantly better self-reported physical domain QOL score noted in the NJ group, both at the time of discharge (44.7 ± 6.2 vs 39.8 + 5.6; p value, 0.005) and at the 6-week follow-up (55.4 ± 5.2 vs 48.6 ± 4.5; p value, < 0.001)., Conclusion: Based on the findings of our RCT, we conclude that both enteral access methods (NJ vs. FJ) exhibit comparable incidences of catheter-related complications. The use of NJ tube is a viable alternative to a surgical FJ, has the benefit of early removal, and saves the distress associated with a tube per abdomen., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: This study was designed to compare the clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and conventional care in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer, which have not previously been compared., Methods: This single-center retrospective study included prospective PRO data from August 2019 to June 2021. Clinical outcomes included perioperative complications and postoperative length of stay (PLOS). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) and esophagus-specific module (QLQ-OES18) preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively. Mixed-effects models were used to longitudinally compare quality of life (QOL) scores between the two modes., Results: Patients undergoing conventional care and ERAS were analyzed (n = 348 and 109, respectively). The ERAS group had fewer overall complications, pneumonia, arrhythmia, and a shorter PLOS than the conventional group, and outperformed the conventional group in five functional QLQ-C30 domains and five symptom QLQ-OES18 domains, including less dysphagia (p < 0.0001), trouble talking (p = 0.0006), and better eating (p < 0.0001). These advantages persisted for 3 months postoperatively. For the cervical circular stapled anastomosis, the initial domains and duration of benefit were reduced in the ERAS group., Conclusions: The ERAS protocol has significant advantages over conventional care in terms of clinical outcomes, lowering postoperative symptom burden, and improving functional QOL in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. Selection of the optimal technique for cervical anastomosis is a key operative component of ERAS that maintains the symptom domains and duration of the advantages of PROs., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: The effect of intraoperative anesthetic regimen on pulmonary outcome after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is yet undetermined. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of volatile anesthesia (sevoflurane or desflurane) compared with propofol-based intravenous anesthesia on pulmonary complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy., Methods: Patients scheduled for minimally invasive esophagectomy were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 general anesthetic regimens (sevoflurane, desflurane, or propofol). The primary outcome was the incidence of pulmonary complications within the 7 days postoperatively, which was a collapsed composite end point, including respiratory infection, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, atelectasis, respiratory failure, bronchospasm, pulmonary embolism, and aspiration pneumonitis. The severity of pulmonary complications, surgery-related complications, and other secondary outcomes were also assessed., Results: Of 647 patients assessed for eligibility, 558 were randomized, and 553 were analyzed. A total of 185 patients were assigned to the sevoflurane group, 185 in the desflurane, and 183 in the propofol group. Patients receiving a volatile anesthetic (sevoflurane or desflurane) had a significantly lower incidence (36.5% vs 47.5%; odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.91; P = .013) and lower severity grade of pulmonary complications ( P = .035) compared to the patients receiving propofol. There were no statistically significant differences in other secondary outcomes between the 2 groups., Conclusions: In patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy, the use of volatile anesthesia (sevoflurane or desflurane) resulted in the reduced risk and severity of pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days as compared to propofol-based intravenous anesthesia., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

Aim: Conflicting results have been reported about the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy. We aimed to unravel the potential effect of neoadjuvant therapy on AL after esophagectomy through a network meta-analysis., Methods: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed by retrieving relevant literature from PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies (RS) comparing the following treatment modalities were included: neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nR), neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT), and surgery alone (SA). Subgroup analyses by radiation dose, examined lymph nodes (ELN), route of reconstruction, site of anastomosis, and surgical approach were also conducted., Results: A total of 62 studies with 12,746 patients were included for the present study, among which 17 were RCTs. There were no significantly statistical differences observed among the five treatment modalities in AL for both RCTs (nCRT-nICT: risk ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 0.52-4.4; nCT-nICT: 1.71, 0.56-5.08; nICT-nR: 0.79, 0.12-8.02; nICT-SA: 0.59, 0.2-1.84) and RS (nCRT-nICT: odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 0.84-2.84; nCT-nICT: 1.56, 0.87-2.88; nICT-SA: 0.6, 0.31-1.12; nICT-nR: 1.08, 0.09-36.02). Subgroup analysis revealed that no significant difference in AL was observed among the five treatment modalities except for the impact of nCRT versus nCT (0.21, 0.05-0.73) on AL with a radiation dose ≥41.4 Gy., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy do not significantly increase the incidence of AL after esophagectomy. Administration of irradiation with a moderate dose is not associated with elevated risk in AL. Clinicians can be less apprehensive about prescribing nCRT., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine published by Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: This study aimed to observe the occurrence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, as well as its recovery and influencing factors within 7 months after surgery., Methods: From July 2020 to July 2021, among all patients who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy, 90 patients who developed vocal cord paralysis after surgery were included in the study. These patients underwent endoscopic vocal cord function assessment every 1 to 2 months and continued until 7 months postoperatively., Results: Among all 388 patients undergoing esophagectomy, 23.2% (90/388) of patients suffered postoperative vocal cord paralysis. Left, right, and bilateral injuries were confirmed in 73 (81.1%), 12 (13.3%), and 5 patients (5.6%), respectively. With a median recovery time being 183 days, the cumulative overall recovery rate was 65.4% at 7 months, 68.6% for the left side, 55.6% for the right, and 20.0% for bilateral injuries. In multivariable analysis, cervical paraoesophageal lymph node dissection and conventional thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy were demonstrated to be independent risk factors associated with non-recovery of vocal cord paralysis., Conclusions: After intensive endoscopic follow-up, a cumulative vocal cord paralysis recovery rate of 65.4% within 7 months was observed in patients after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. Cervical paraoesophageal lymph node dissection and conventional thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy were demonstrated to be risk factors hindering vocal cord paralysis recovery., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The focus of this research is to examine the growing use of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Specifically, it evaluates the immediate clinical and cancer-related results of combining robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with a systematic approach to total mesoesophageal excision, as opposed to traditional open transthoracic esophagectomy methods that do not employ a structured total mesoesophageal excision protocol., Methods: A propensity score-matched analysis of 185 robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies and 223 open transthoracic esophagectomies after standardized Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was performed. After 1:1 nearest neighbor matching to account for confounding by covariates, outcomes of 181 robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and 181 open transthoracic esophagectomy were compared., Results: The patient characteristics showed significant differences in the age distribution and in comorbidities such as coronary heart disease, arterial hypertension, and anticoagulant intake. The R0-resection rate of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (96.7%) was significantly higher than open transthoracic esophagectomy (89.0%, P = .004). Thirty-day mortality and hospital mortality showed no significant differences. Postoperative pneumonia rate after robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (12.7%) was significantly reduced (open transthoracic esophagectomy 28.7%, P < .001). Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy had a significantly shorter intensive care unit stay (P < .001) and shorter hospital stay (P < .001)., Conclusion: This single-center, retrospective study employing propensity score matching found that combining robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with structured total mesoesophageal excision results in better short-term clinical and oncologic outcomes than open transthoracic esophagectomy. This finding is significant because the increased rate of R0 resection could indicate a higher likelihood of improved long-term survival. Additionally, enhanced overall postoperative recovery may contribute to better risk management in esophagectomy procedures., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a dreaded complication following esophageal resection. No clear consensus exist for the optimal handling of this severe complication. The aim of this study was to describe the treatment outcome following AL. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study including all patients with AL operated with Ivor Lewis esophagectomy from 2010 to 2021 at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. 74/526 (14%) patients had AL. Patient outcomes were analyzed and categorized according to main AL treatment strategy; stent (54%), endoscopic vacuum therapy and stent (EVT + stent) (19%), nasogastric tube and antibiotics (conservative) (16%), EVT (8%) and by other endoscopic means (other) (3%). One patient had surgical debridement of the chest cavity. In 66 patients (89%), the perforation healed after median 27 (range: 4-174) days. Airway fistulation was observed in 11 patients (15%). Leak severity (ECCG) was associated with development of airway fistula (P = 0.03). The median hospital and intensive care unit stays were 30 (range: 12-285) and 9 (range: 0-60) days. The 90-days mortality among patients with AL was 5% and at follow up, 13% of all deaths were related to AL. AL closure rates were comparable across the groups, but longer in the EVT + stent group (55 days vs. 29.5 days, P = 0.04). Thirty-two percent developed a symptomatic anastomotic stricture within 12 months. Conclusion: The majority of AL can be treated endoscopically with preservation of the conduit and the anastomosis. We observed a high number of AL-associated airway fistulas., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Surgery for cancer of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction can be performed with a variety of minimally invasive and open approaches. The left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (LTE) is an open technique that gives an opportunity to operate in the chest and abdomen with excellent exposure of the gastro-esophageal junction through a single incision, and there is currently no equivalent minimally invasive technique available. The aim of this multi-institutional review was to study a large contemporary international study cohort of patients treated with LTE. An international multicenter cohort study was performed including all patients treated with LTE at six high-volume centers for gastro-esophageal cancer surgery between 2012 and 2022. Patient data were prospectively collected in each participating centers' institutional database. Information about patient, tumor, and treatment details were collected. The study cohort included a total of 793 patients treated with LTE during the study period. The most frequently observed complications were pneumonia in 185/727 (25.5%) patients and atrial fibrillation in 91/727 (12.5%). Anastomotic leak occurred in 35/727 (4.8%) patients; no patient suffered from conduit necrosis. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 15/785 (1.9%) patients and 90-day mortality in 39/785 (5.0%) patients. Factors with statistically significant association with survival were American Society for Anesthesiologists-score, tumor location, tumor stage, and tumor free resection margins. Neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with increased survival compared to surgery alone but neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed statistically significant improved survival with hazard ratio 0.60 (95% confidence intervals:0.44-0.80, P = 0.001) in a multivariable adjusted model. This study demonstrates that LTE can be applied in selected patients with results that are comparable to other large studies of open and minimally invasive surgery for esophageal or gastro-esophageal cancer at high-volume centers., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Background: Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) poses a considerable health burden, particularly in regions such as East Asia. This study aims to investigate the long-term outcomes of OSCC patients who are smokers and drinkers., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective analysis, data from Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute Esophageal Cancer Case Management Database between January 2010 and December 2017 were examined. Patients were categorised into different groups based on their smoking and alcohol consumption history: None, Smoker, Non-Smoker, Smoke-Only, Drinker, Non-Drinker, Drinker-Only, and Both. Survival outcomes were compared between the groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), measured from surgery to death or last follow-up in April 2022., Results: The OS median was 45.4 months for all patients after oesophagectomy. Smokers had a significantly lower median OS of 36.6 months compared with Non-Smokers with 66.2 months (p<0.001). Similarly, Drinkers had a lower median OS of 34.4 months compared with Non-Drinkers with 52.0 months (p<0.001). PSM analysis confirmed the significant differences in OS between Smokers and Non-Smokers (p=0.002) and between Drinkers and Non-Drinkers (p=0.002). Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in OS between Group Another and Group Both, Group Smoker-Only and Group Drinker-Only, and Group Drinker-Only and Group Both. (figure 4) CONCLUSION: Smoking and drinking were associated with significantly reduced OS in patients. However, no significant differences were found between the subgroups of patients who only smoked, only drank, or engaged in both habits., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is an important biomarker for prognosis and health in older patients with cancer. Limited information is available on the recovery course of SMM after oesophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in older patients. This study was performed to investigate the recovery course of SMM after oesophagectomy following NAC and the preoperative predictors of delayed recovery in older patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer (LAEC)., Methods: This single-centre retrospective cohort study involved older (≥65 years) and non-older (<65 years) patients with LAEC who underwent oesophagectomy following NAC. The SMM index (SMI) was calculated using CT images. One-way analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed., Results: In total, 110 older patients and 57 non-older patients were analysed. Loss of the SMI after NAC to 12 months postoperatively was significantly greater in older patients than in non-older patients (p<0.01). The significant preoperative predictor of delayed recovery of the SMI 12 months after surgery was loss of the SMI during NAC in older patients (per 1%: adjusted OR 1.249; 95% CI 1.131 to 1.403; p<0.001), but not in non-older patients (per 1%: OR 1.074; 95% CI 0.988 to 1.179; p=0.108)., Conclusions: There is an especially large unmet need for preventing the long-term sequelae of SMM loss in older patients with LAEC after oesophagectomy following NAC. In older patients, loss of SMM during NAC is an especially useful biomarker for prescribing postoperative rehabilitation to prevent postoperative loss of SMM., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TH received research grants from the Japan Health Research Promotion Bureau. TT and TF received research grants from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Frailty becomes more pronounced with advancing age, tightly intertwined with adverse clinical outcomes. Across diverse medical disciplines, frailty is now universally recognized as not only a risk factor but also a predictive indicator for unfavorable clinical prognosis., Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study that included clinical data from patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer treated surgically at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University in 2021. For each patient, we calculated their 11-index modified frailty index(mFI-11) scores and categorized the patients into a frailty group (mFI-11hign) and a non-frailty group (mFI-11low) based on the optimal grouping cutoff value of 0.27 from a previous study. The primary study index was the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection, arrhythmia, anastomotic fistula, chylothorax, and electrolyte disturbance complications. Secondary study indicators included postoperative ICU stay, total hospitalization time, readmission rate within 30 days of discharge, and mortality within 30 days after surgery. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the association between mFI-11 and adverse outcomes as well as postoperative complications., Results: Five hundred and fifteen patients were included, including 64.9% (334/515) in the non-frailty group and 35.1% (181/515) in the frailty group. Comparing postoperative complication rates between the two groups revealed lower incidences of postoperative anastomotic fistula (21.5% vs. 4.5%), chylothorax (16.0% vs. 2.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (61.9% vs. 9.9%), pulmonary infections (85.1% vs. 26.6%), and electrolyte disturbance (84.5% vs. 15.0%) in patients of the non-frailty group was lower than that in the frailty group (p < 0.05). mFI-11 showed better prognostic results in predicting postoperative complications. anastomotic fistula (area under the ROC curve AUROC = 0.707), chylothorax (area under the ROC curve AUROC = 0.744), pulmonary infection (area under the ROC curve AUROC = 0.767), arrhythmia (area under the ROC curve AUROC = 0.793), electrolyte disturbance (area under the ROC curve AUROC = 0.832), and admission to ICU (area under the ROC curve AUROC = 0.700)., Conclusion: Preoperative frail elderly patients with esophageal cancer have a high rate of postoperative complications. mFI-11 can be used as an objective indicator for identifying elderly patients at risk for esophageal cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: This research aimed to clarify the metastatic patterns of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and to investigate appropriate strategies for lymph node dissection., Methods: Patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving esophagectomy from December 2020 to April 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors for subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes metastasis were determined by chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. We visualized the metastasis rates of these specific lymph nodes based on the different clinicopathological characteristics. Correlation between subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes metastasis and postoperative complications were also analyzed., Results: A total of 503 thoracic esophageal squamous carcinoma patients who underwent esophagectomy were enrolled. The metastasis rates of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes were 10.3%, 10.3%, and 10.9%, respectively. The lymphovascular invasion status and tumor location were the significant predictors for subcarinal and right recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes metastasis, respectively (P < 0.001 and P = 0.013). For left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis, younger age (P = 0.020) and presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.009) were significant risk factors. Additionally, pulmonary infection is the most frequent postoperative complication in patients with dissection of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes. There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage (P = 0.872), pulmonary infection (P = 0.139), chylothorax (P = 0.702), and hoarseness (P = 0.179) between the subcarinal lymph node dissection cohort and the reservation cohort. The incidence of hoarseness significantly increased in both right (P = 0.042) and left (P = 0.010) recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes dissection cohorts compared by the reservation cohorts, with incidence rates of 5.9% and 6.7%, respectively., Conclusions: The metastasis rates of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were all over 10%. The dissection of subcarinal lymph nodes does not increase postoperative complications risk, while recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes dissection significantly increases the incidence of hoarseness. Thus, lymph node dissection of subcarinal lymph nodes should be conducted routinely, while recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes dissection may be selectively performed in specific patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Due to the high morbidity associated with esophagectomies, patients are often directly admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) for postoperative monitoring. However, critical complications can arise after this initial ICU stay. We hypothesized that the timing of ICU stay was not optimal for the care of patients after esophagectomy and aimed to determine when patients are at risk for developing critical complications., Methods: We searched the National Safety and Quality Improvement Program for patients who underwent an esophagectomy between 2016 and 2021. The outcome of interest was the interval between surgery and first critical complication. A critical complication was defined as one likely to require intensive care, including respiratory failure, septic shock, etc. Multivariate regression was performed to identify the risks of complications., Results: This study included 6813 patients from more than 70 institutions. Within the first 30 d postesophagectomy, 21.59% of patients experienced at least one critical complication. Half of first critical complications occurred after postoperative day 5, and 85.05% of them occurred after postoperative day 2. Risk factors for critical complications included age greater than 60 y, preoperative comorbidities, and open surgical approach. Malignancies were associated with a significantly lower incidence of critical complications., Conclusions: Critical complications occurred beyond the immediate postesophagectomy period. Therefore, low-risk patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomies can be safely monitored outside the ICU, allowing for better patient care and resource utilization., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major contributor to surgery-related morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate if positive-smoking status is associated with the incidence of this complication., Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was performed on April 4th, 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised human participants undergoing esophagectomy, age ≥ 18, n ≥ 5, and identification of smoking status. The primary outcome was incidence of anastomotic leak. Sub-group analysis by ex- or current smoking status was performed. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4.1 using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Publication bias was evaluated visually with funnel plots and through the Egger test., Results: A total of 220 abstracts were screened, of which 69 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, with 13 studies selected for final inclusion. This included 16,103 patients, of which 4433 were ex- or current smokers, and 9141 were never smokers. Meta-analysis revealed an increased odds of anastomotic leak in patients with a positive-smoking status (current or ex-smokers) compared to never smokers (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18-1.76, I 2  = 44%, p < 0.001. Meta-analysis of six studies comparing active smokers alone to never smokers identified a significant increased odds of anastomotic leak (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.25-2.59, p = 0.002, I 2  = 0%). Meta-analysis of five studies comparing ex-smokers to never smokers identified a significant increased odds of anastomotic leak (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.02-1.82, p = 0.04, I 2  = 0%). The odds of anastomotic leak decreased among ex-smokers compared to active smokers., Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the association between positive-smoking status and the risk of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Results further emphasize the importance of preoperative smoking cessation to reduce post-operative morbidity., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the POAF rate and blood FABP4 levels after perioperative L-carnitine administration in patients with esophageal cancer., Methods: L-carnitine (3 g in three divided doses) was administered to 15 patients 2 days before and 3 days after surgery. POAF during the study period and blood FABP4 levels (ELISA) before and after L-carnitine administration were evaluated. Accurate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for POAF incidence and changes in blood FABP4 levels were calculated. The preoperative predicted POAF rate was calculated using an application for esophageal cancer. The correlation between FABP4 levels and the predicted POAF rate was analyzed using Pearson's coefficient (r)., Results: Thirteen patients completed this study. The predicted POAF rate was 24% (17%, 34%) (median; interquartile range). The actual incidence of POAF was 7.7% (95% CI: 0.2-36%). Blood FABP4 levels changed from 10.3 to 7.0 ng/mL; the average change was - 3.3 (95% CI: - 6.6 to - 0.1). A positive correlation was found between preoperative FABP4 levels and the predicted POAF rates (r = 0.564)., Conclusions: The POAF rate after esophageal surgery was 7.7% for L-carnitine. L-carnitine may reduce blood FABP4 levels. This preliminary study will contribute to the planning of sample sizes in future randomized trials., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)