Search

Introduction : The aim of this study was to assess the inter-rater reliability of selected static, semi-dynamic, and dynamic test assessment methods for evaluation of scapular positioning and function. Methods : A standardized three-phase (i.e. training, overall agreement, and actual study) protocol for reliability studies was applied on 41 overhead sports participants, aged 18-56 (22 with obvious scapular winging, classified as visibility of the medial or inferior angle border of scapula). Ten scapular test assessment methods (two static, three semi-dynamic, and five dynamic) were evaluated. Results : Bland-Altman plots showed no funnel effects, although systematic bias and significant differences between raters were present in three of the methods. ICC values ranged from 0.71 to 0.80 for the static test assessment methods and from 0.25-0.92 for the semi-dynamic test assessment methods. Three of the five dynamic test assessment methods had ICCs of 0.47-0.68. For the two remaining dynamic test assessment methods, kappa varied between -0.034 and 0.71. Using PABAK, kappa increased to 0.54-0.86. Conclusion : Four scapular test assessment methods (Upper horizontal distance, Lower horizontal distance at max shoulder flexion, Acromial distance, and Winging scapula) showed satisfactory inter-rater reliability. Simple visual observational methods and quantitative distance measurements have better reliability between clinicians than more complex measurements and may be better suited for use in clinical practice.

Background: An optimal treatment for traumatic anterior shoulder instability (TASI) remains to be identified. A shoulder instability neuromuscular exercise (SINEX) program has been designed for patients with TASI, but has not yet been tested in patients eligible for surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate and evaluate the feasibility and safety of the SINEX program for patients diagnosed with TASI and eligible for surgery., Methods: A feasibility study with an experimental, longitudinal design using both quantitative and qualitative research methods. A total of seven participants underwent the SINEX program, a 12-week exercise program including physiotherapist-supervised sessions. Feasibility data on recruitment, retention, compliance, acceptability and safety was collected through observation and individual semi-structured interviews. Clinical tests and self-report questionnaires were completed at baseline and 12 weeks follow-up. Clinical assessments included apprehension and relocation tests, shoulder joint position sense (SJPS), shoulder sensorimotor control measured by center of pressure path length (COPL) on a force platform, isometric strength measured by Constant Score-Isometric Maximal Voluntary Contraction (CS-iMVC), self-report questionnaires including Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Global Perceived Effect questionnaire (GPE)., Results: With one participant recruited every 2 weeks, the recruitment rate was 50% lower than expected. Two of seven participants achieved compliance, defined as at least 66% completion of the scheduled home exercises and at least 50% attendance for the physiotherapist supervised sessions. Barriers for successful compliance were (1) inability to take along exercise equipment when travelling, (2) sick leave, (3) holidays and (4) lack of time/busy days. Four adverse events occurred, one of which was related to the intervention (patellar redislocation). All participants expressed satisfaction with the intervention and felt safe during the exercises. All participants improved in the GPE. Change greater than minimal detectable change (MDC) was reported in four participants in some of the outcome assessments. One of the seven participants declined surgery., Conclusion: Further assessment is required on several areas before performing an RCT evaluating the efficacy of the SINEX program for patients with TASI considered eligible for surgery. No adverse events suggest that the program is safe, but patients with general hypermobility may need additional adjustments to prevent adverse events in other areas of the body., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04152304, retrospectively registered., Competing Interests: Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Background and aims Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (ASD) is frequent in active populations and associated with a 39% higher risk of recurrent dislocation, which may cause persistent shoulder problems, pain, and impaired shoulder-related quality of life. While local and distant pressure pain sensitivity has been demonstrated in other shoulder conditions, little is known about the link between pressure pain sensitivity and ASD. The interesting aspect is whether recurrent dislocation - resulting in symptoms of longer duration - is associated with more pronounced pressure pain sensitivity, or if presence of pressure pain sensitivity may be part of the reasons why patients develop recurrent dislocation. Therefore, this study aimed at evaluating whether patients with recurrent ASD display greater pressure pain sensitivity and more painful body sites than patients with first-time ASD. Methods This was a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a randomized controlled trial including 34 patients with first-time ASD [82% male, mean (SD) age 26 (7) years] and 22 patients with recurrent ASD [96% male, mean (SD) age 25 (5) years]. Patients were assessed as follows: (1) assessment of local and distant pressure pain sensitivity evaluated by pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) using a handheld algometer on mm. trapezius superior, levator scapula, pectorales major, deltoideus, and tibialis anterior, (2) pain intensity at rest during the previous 24 h, (3) number of ASD, and (4) number of painful body sites on a region-divided body chart. Results The PPTs were not significantly different between first-time and recurrent ASD [mean (SD) kPa for m. trapezius superior 264 (110) vs. 261 (88), m. levator scapula 301 (157) vs. 325 (163), m. pectorales major 234 (163) vs. 269 (130), m. deltoideus 290 (166) vs. 352 (173), m. tibialis anterior 420 (202) vs. 449 (184)], two-way ANCOVA, adjusted for sex and age, F (4,263) = 0.29, p = 0.88. For both groups, the PPTs were lower at the shoulder sites than at m. tibialis anterior (difference 117-184 kPa, 95% CI range 33-267). Females had lower PPTs than males (difference 124 kPa, 95% CI 64-183). The number (SD) of painful body sites were 2.2 (1.9) for first-time ASD and 2.6 (5.4) for recurrent ASD, with no between-group differences, one-way ANCOVA, adjusted for sex and age, F (1, 52) = 0.24, p = 0.63. There was a strong correlation between PPTs at the shoulder and lower leg, r = 0.84, p < 0.01. Conclusions This study demonstrated no differences in local and distant pressure pain sensitivity or number of painful body sites between patients with first-time and recurrent ASD. Females had lower PPTs than males, and a strong correlation was found between PPTs at the shoulder and lower leg. Implications Patients with first-time and recurrent ASD seem to have similar pressure pain sensitivity, but lower PPTs compared to existing normative data, suggesting that it is relevant to evaluate the status of the pain system in these patients to prevent triggering or worsening of their symptoms. However, it remains unanswered how these changes affect the patients' ability to undergo rehabilitation, symptom response and long-term shoulder function.

Background: The aim was to investigate the effect of Electromyography (EMG)-biofeedback guided exercises (BIONEX) on shoulder pain and function in participants with subacromial pain syndrome (SPS)., Methods: Twenty-five women and 24 men (19-67 years), diagnosed with SPS, were randomised to BIONEX or the same exercises without EMG-biofeedback (NEX). Primary outcome was shoulder pain during the past 7 days (Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)). Secondary outcomes included self-reported (Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)), and measured shoulder function (surface EMG from upper trapezius, lower trapezius and serratus anterior) in mean and ratios of % of maximum voluntary EMG (%MVE) and onset time (msec), during arm tasks with 0, 1 and 3 kg., Results: There was no group difference (BIONEX versus NEX) in changed shoulder pain (NPRS, mean difference 0.18 (95% CI. -1.56; 1.19)), self-reported or measured shoulder function. Both groups, however, showed significant within-group improvements on self-reported outcomes (NPRS, DASH, OSS), only clinically relevant on NPRS (BIONEX 2.23 (SD 2.47); NEX 2.04 (SD 2.29))., Conclusion: BIONEX and NEX were both effective in reducing pain to a clinically relevant level, while EMG-biofeedback did not make a difference. The current neuromuscular shoulder exercise protocol is recommended., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with non-operated traumatic primary anterior shoulder dislocation (PASD) are assumed to have less shoulder impairment than patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations (RASD). This may impact treatment decision strategy. The aim was to study whether patients with non-operated traumatic PASD have less shoulder impairment than those with RASD., Methods: In a cross-sectional study baseline data from patients with PASD and RASD in a randomised controlled trial of non-operative shoulder exercise treatment were used. Shoulder function was self-reported (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), General Health (EQ-5D-VAS), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)), and measured (Constant-Murley shoulder Score (CMS total), CMS - Range of Motion (CMS-ROM, CMS - strength, proprioception, clinical tests)., Results: In total, 56 patients (34 (28 men) with PASD and 22 (21 men) with RASD) (mean age 26 years) participated. WOSI total was 1064 and 1048, and TSK above 37 (indicating high re-injury fear) was present in 33 (97%) and 21 (96%) of the groups with PASD and RASD, with no group difference. CMS total (66.4 and 70.4), CMS-ROM (28.7 and 31.5), CMS-strength (injured shoulder: 7.6 kg and 9.1 kg), proprioception and clinical tests were the same. Furthermore, 26 (76%) with PASD and 13 (59%) with RASD reported not to have received non-operative shoulder treatment., Conclusions: Non-operated patients with PASD and self-reported shoulder trouble three-six weeks after initial injury do not have less shoulder impairment (self-reportedly or objectively measured) than non-operated patients RASD and self-reported shoulder trouble three-six weeks after their latest shoulder dislocation event.

Objective: First, to investigate the intertester reliability of clinical shoulder instability and laxity tests, and second, to describe the mutual dependency of each test evaluated by each tester for identifying self-reported shoulder instability and laxity., Methods: A standardised protocol for conducting reliability studies was used to test the intertester reliability of the six clinical shoulder instability and laxity tests: apprehension, relocation, surprise, load-and-shift, sulcus sign and Gagey. Cohen's kappa (κ) with 95% CIs besides prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK), accounting for insufficient prevalence and bias, were computed to establish the intertester reliability and mutual dependency., Results: Forty individuals (13 with self-reported shoulder instability and laxity-related shoulder problems and 27 normal shoulder individuals) aged 18-60 were included. Fair (relocation), moderate (load-and-shift, sulcus sign) and substantial (apprehension, surprise, Gagey) intertester reliability were observed across tests (κ 0.39-0.73; 95% CI 0.00 to 1.00). PABAK improved reliability across tests, resulting in substantial to almost perfect intertester reliability for the apprehension, surprise, load-and-shift and Gagey tests (κ 0.65-0.90). Mutual dependencies between each test and self-reported shoulder problem showed apprehension, relocation and surprise to be the most often used tests to characterise self-reported shoulder instability and laxity conditions., Conclusions: Four tests (apprehension, surprise, load-and-shift and Gagey) out of six were considered intertester reliable for clinical use, while relocation and sulcus sign tests need further standardisation before acceptable evidence. Furthermore, the validity of the tests for shoulder instability and laxity needs to be studied., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Objectives: To translate and adapt the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) questionnaire into Danish and, to evaluate measurement properties of an electronic Danish WOSI version., Methods: The Swedish WOSI version was used for translation and adaptation into Danish followed by examination of test-retest reproducibility (14-day interval) besides concurrent and construct validity. Concurrent validity was examined by comparing WOSI in paper version with an electronic version, whereas construct validity was examined by comparing WOSI with Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Reproducibility was evaluated with Intraclass correlations (ICC), Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and limits of agreement (LOA). Validity was evaluated with Pearson's ( r) and Concordance Correlation Coefficients (CCC)., Results: 41 subjects (median age 34, range 18-57) were included in the analysis of reproducibility. An ICC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99) for the total WOSI score was found. SEM was 100.1, resulting in an MDC of 277.5 and LOAs within the range of -246.4 and 308.6. 25 subjects (median age 34, range 18-72) were included in the analysis of concurrent validity obtaining a CCC of 0.96 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.98). Construct validity was investigated in 62 subjects (median age 31, range 18-72) obtaining correlations of 0.83 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.97) (NPRS) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.94) (OSS)., Conclusions: An electronic Danish version of WOSI presented excellent test-retest reproducibility and acceptable measurement errors. Also, concurrent validity between paper and electronic version was highly satisfactory as was the construct validity. Surprisingly, though, the NPRS correlated more with WOSI than OSS., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Background: Anterior shoulder dislocation is a common injury and may have considerable impact on shoulder-related quality of life (QoL). If not warranted for initial stabilising surgery, patients are mostly left with little to no post-traumatic rehabilitation. This may be due to lack of evidence-based exercise programmes. In similar, high-impact injuries (e.g. anterior cruciate ligament tears in the knee) neuromuscular exercise has shown large success in improving physical function and QoL. Thus, the objective of this trial is to compare a nonoperative neuromuscular exercise shoulder programme with standard care in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations (TASD)., Methods/design: Randomised, assessor-blinded, controlled, multicentre trial. Eighty patients with a TASD will be recruited from three orthopaedic departments in Denmark. Patients with primary or recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations due to at least one traumatic event will be randomised to 12 weeks of either a standardised, individualised or physiotherapist-supervised neuromuscular shoulder exercise programme or standard care (self-managed shoulder exercise programme). Patients will be stratified according to injury status (primary or recurrent). Primary outcome will be change from baseline to 12 weeks in the patient-reported QoL outcome questionnaire, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)., Discussion: This trial will be the first study to compare the efficacy and safety of two different nonoperative exercise treatment strategies for patients with TASD. Moreover, this is also the first study to investigate nonoperative treatment effects in patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations. Lastly, this study will add knowledge to the shared decision-making process of treatment strategies for clinical practice., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02371928 . Registered on 9 February 2015 at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Protocol Registration System.