Search

Background Perirolandic motor area gliomas present invasive eloquent region tumors within the precentral gyrus that are difficult to resect without causing neurologic deficits. Study Aims This study evaluates the role of awake craniotomy andmotormapping on neurologic outcome and extent of resection (EOR) of tumor in the perirolandic motor region. It also analyzes preoperative risk factors for intraoperative seizures. Methods: We evaluated 57 patients who underwent an awake craniotomy for a perirolandic motor area eloquent region glioma. Patients who had positive mapping (PM) or intraoperative identification of motor regions in the cortex using direct cortical stimulation were compared with patients with no positive motor mapping following direct cortical stimulation and negative mapping (NM). Preoperative risks, intraoperative seizures, perioperativeoutcomes, tumor characteristics, andEORwerealso compared. Alogistic regression model was used to evaluate the predictors for intraoperative seizures in this patient cohort. Results: Overall, 33 patients were in the PM cohort; 24 were in the NM cohort. Our study showed an 8.8% incidence of intraoperative seizures during cortical and subcortical mapping for awake craniotomies in the perirolandic motor area, none of which aborted the case. PM patients had significantly more intraoperative and postoperative seizures (15.5%and 30.3%, respectively) compared with theNMpatients (0% and 8.3%, respectively; p = 0.046 and 0.044). New transient postoperativemotor deficits were found more often in the PM group (51.5%) versus the NM group (12.5%; p = 0.002). A univariate logistic regression showed that PM(odds ratio [OR]: 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.34; p = 0.035) and preoperative tumor volume (OR: 0.998; 95% CI, 0.996-0.999; p = 0.049) were significant predictors for intraoperative seizures in patients with perirolandic gliomas. Conclusion: Awake craniotomies in the perirolandic motor region can be safely performed with a similar incidence of intraoperative seizures as reported for the language cortex. PM in this regionmay increase the likelihood of perioperative seizures or motor deficits compared with NM. Craniotomies that minimize cortical exposure for perirolandic gliomas that may not localize motor regions can still allow for extensive tumor resection with a good postoperative outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective  This study presents a comparative analysis of cost efficacy between the microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches, evaluating neurological outcome, extent of resection (EOR), and inpatient hospital costs. Design  This study was a retrospective chart review. Setting  This study was conducted at a tertiary care center. Participants  The study group consisted of 68 patients with transsphenoidal surgeries between January 2007 and January 2014. Main Outcome Measures  Two-sample t -tests and Pearson's chi-square test evaluated inpatient costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), volumetric EOR, and neurological outcomes. Results  Total inpatient costs per patient was $22,853 in the microscopic group and less ($19,736) in the endoscopic group ( p  = 0.049). Operating room costs were $5,974 in the microscopic group and lower in the endoscopic group ($5,045; p  = 0.038). Operative time was 203.6 minutes in the microscopic group and 166.3 minutes in the endoscopic group ( p  = 0.032). The QALY score, length of hospital stay, and postoperative outcomes were found to be similar between the two cohorts. Multivariate linear regression modeling suggested that length of stay ( p  < 0.001) and operative time ( p  = 0.008) were important factors that influenced total inpatient costs following transsphenoidal surgery. Conclusion  This study shows that transsphenoidal surgery is more cost effective with the endoscopic approach than with the microscopic approach and depends on efficiency in the operating room as well as reduction in the length of hospitalization.