Search

Key Points Patients with APL treated with ATRA-ATO reported better long-term quality of life outcomes than patients treated with chemotherapy.Late comorbidity and health problem prevalence was similar between patients with APL previously treated with ATRA-ATO or chemotherapy., Visual Abstract, The main objective of this study was to compare the long-term health-related quality of life of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) treated with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic trioxide (ATO) vs ATRA plus standard chemotherapy. Patients previously enrolled in the randomized controlled trial APL0406 were considered eligible for this follow-up study. The following patient-reported outcome measures were used: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (QLQ-CIPN20), and the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). The prevalence of late comorbidities and health problems was also assessed. The clinical significance of differences was evaluated based on predefined thresholds. A total of 161 of 232 potentially eligible patients were analyzed, of whom 83 were treated with ATRA-ATO and 78 were treated with ATRA chemotherapy. The median time since diagnosis of the study sample was 8 years. The 2 largest clinically meaningful differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 were observed for role functioning (Δ = 8.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5 to 16.3) and dyspnea (Δ = −8.5; 95% CI, −16.4 to −0.7), favoring patients treated with ATRA-ATO. With regard to the SF-36 results, a clinically relevant better physical component score (Δ = 4.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.8) was observed in patients treated with ATRA-ATO, but this was not the case for the mental component score. The 2 groups showed similar profiles in the scores of the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 scales and in the prevalence of late comorbidities. Overall, our findings suggest that the greater and more sustained antileukemic efficacy of ATRA-ATO is also associated with better long-term patient-reported outcomes than ATRA chemotherapy. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03096496.

Background Patients with hematological malignancies are at an increased risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 disease (COVID‐19) and adverse outcome. However, a low mortality rate has been reported in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Preclinical evidence suggests that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may have a protective role against severe COVID‐19. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional study of 564 consecutive patients with CML who were tested for anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG/IgM antibodies at their first outpatient visit between May and early November 2020 in five hematologic centers representative of three Italian regions. Results The estimated serological prevalence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in patients with CML after the first pandemic wave was similar to that in the general population (about 2%), both at national and regional levels. CML patients with positive anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 serology were more frequently male (p = 0.027) and active workers (p = 0.012), while there was no significant association with TKI treatment type. Only 3 out of 11 IgG‐positive patients had previously received a molecular diagnosis of COVID‐19, while the remainders were asymptomatic or with mild symptoms. Conclusions Our data confirm that the course of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in patients with CML is generally mild and reassure about the safety of continuing TKIs during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Furthermore, we suggest that patients with CML succeed to mount an antibody response after exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2, similar to the general population., The estimated serological prevalence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in patients with CML after the first pandemic wave was similar to that of the general population (about 2% in Italy). Our data reassure about the safety of continuing TKI treatment during the ongoing pandemic and suggest that patients with CML succeed to mount an antibody response against SARS‐CoV‐2 whether on TKI treatment or not.

This article presents the results of group discussion among an ad hoc constituted panel of experts aimed at identifying and addressing unmet clinical needs (UCNs) in the management of infectious risk associated with eculizumab or new terminal complement inhibitors (CIs) in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). With the Delphi technique, the most clinically relevant UCNs in PNH patients candidate to or on terminal CI were selected. They resulted to be: optimizing the infection prevention measures; developing non pharmacological infectious risk-mitigation strategies; improving the management of disease exacerbation during infectious complications. For each of these issues consensus opinions were provided and, when appropriate, proposals for advancement in clinical practice were addressed. The hope is that this comprehensive overview will serve to improve the practice of CIs therapy and inform the design and implementation of new studies in the field.

The addition of venetoclax to hypomethylating agents (HMA-V) improved the outcome of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive treatment. The aim of our study was to confirm data reported in literature, in a real-life multicenter experience. We retrospectively evaluated 56 naïve AML patients who received HMA-V at 8 different collaborating Hematology Units in the North-East of Italy, from September 2018 to October 2020. Patients received azacitidine or decitabine at standard dose, adding venetoclax starting from cycle 1-3. The median time-to-response was 2 cycles and composite complete remission rate (CCR) was 67.9%. Thirteen out of 38 responders (34.2%) relapsed, with a median response duration of 13.7 months. Transfusion independence (TI) was obtained in 27 (87.0%) and 28 (90.3%) out of 31 patients for red blood cells and platelets, respectively. Median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI, 8.1-16.5), and median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 4.6-17.9). Cytogenetic risk was the only variable impacting on survival, while no differences were observed stratifying patients by age, bone marrow blasts, WHO classification or type of HMA. In conclusion, our real-life multicenter experience indicates that HMA-V treatment allows achieving good response rates in naïve AML patients, ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Despite widespread use of decitabine to treat acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), data on its effectiveness and safety in the real-world setting are scanty. Thus, to analyze the performance of decitabine in clinical practice, we pooled together patient-level data of three multicentric observational studies conducted since 2013 throughout Italy, including 306 elderly AML patients (median age 75 years), unfit for intensive chemotherapy, treated with first-line decitabine therapy at the registered schedule of 20 mg/m2 /iv daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) curves, and multivariate hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality were computed. Overall, 1940 cycles of therapy were administered (median, 5 cycles/patient). A total of 148 subjects were responders and, therefore, ORR was 48.4%. Seventy-one patients (23.2%) had complete remission, 32 (10.5%) had partial remission, and 45 (14.7%) had haematologic improvement. Median OS was 11.6 months for patients with favourable-intermediate cytogenetic risk and 7.9 months for those with adverse cytogenetic risk. Median relapse-free survival after CR was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.7-16.0). In multivariate analysis, mortality was higher in patients with adverse cytogenetic risk (HR=1.58; 95% CI: 1.13-2.21) and increased continuously with white blood cell (WBC) count (HR=1.12; 95% CI: 1.06-1.18). A total of 183 infectious adverse events occurred in 136 patients mainly (>90%) within the first five cycles of therapy. This pooled analysis of clinical care studies confirmed, outside of clinical trials, the effectiveness of decitabine as first-line therapy for AML in elderly patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. An adverse cytogenetic profile and a higher WBC count at diagnosis were, in this real life setting, unfavourable predictors of survival.

Achievement of deep molecular response following treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) allows for treatment-free remission (TFR) in many patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Successful TFR is defined as the achievement of a sustained molecular response after cessation of ongoing TKI therapy. The phase 3 ENESTPath study was designed to determine the required optimal duration of consolidation treatment with the second-generation TKI, nilotinib 300 mg twice-daily, to remain in successful TFR without relapse after entering TFR for 12 months. The purpose of this Italian ‘patient’s voice CML’ substudy was to evaluate patients’ psycho-emotional characteristics and quality of life through their experiences of stopping treatment with nilotinib and entering TFR. The purpose of the present contribution is to early present the study protocol of an ongoing study to the scientific community, in order to describe the study rationale and to extensively present the study methodology. Patients aged ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of Philadelphia chromosome positive BCR-ABL1+ CML in chronic phase and treated with front-line imatinib for a minimum of 24 months from the enrollment were eligible. Patients consenting to participate the substudy will have quality of life questionnaires and in-depth qualitative interviews conducted. The substudy will include both qualitative and quantitative design aspects to evaluate the psychological outcomes as assessed via patients’ emotional experience during and after stopping nilotinib therapy. Randomization is hypothesized to be a timepoint of higher psychological alert or distress when compared to consolidation and additionally any improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to nilotinib treatment is expected across the timepoints (from consolidation, to randomization, and TFR). An association is also expected between dysfunctional coping strategies, such as detachments and certain personality traits, and psychological distress and HRQoL impairments. Better HRQoL outcomes are expected in TFR compared to the end of consolidation. This substudy is designed for in-depth assessment of all potential psycho-emotional variables and aims to determine the need for personalized patient care and counselling, and also guide clinicians to consider the psychological well-being of patients who are considering treatment termination.NCT number: NCT01743989, EudraCT number: 2012-005124-15

In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may select for drug-resistant BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutants. Although Sanger sequencing (SS) is considered the gold standard for BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has recently been assessed in retrospective studies. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study (NEXT-in-CML) to assess the frequency and clinical relevance of low-level mutations and the feasibility, cost, and turnaround times of NGS-based BCR-ABL1 mutation screening in a routine setting. A series of 236 consecutive CML patients with failure (n = 124) or warning (n = 112) response to TKI therapy were analyzed in parallel by SS and NGS in 1 of 4 reference laboratories. Fifty-one patients (22 failure, 29 warning) who were negative for mutations by SS had low-level mutations detectable by NGS. Moreover, 29 (27 failure, 2 warning) of 60 patients who were positive for mutations by SS showed additional low-level mutations. Thus, mutations undetectable by SS were identified in 80 out of 236 patients (34%), of whom 42 (18% of the total) had low-level mutations somehow relevant for clinical decision making. Prospective monitoring of mutation kinetics demonstrated that TKI-resistant low-level mutations are invariably selected if the patients are not switched to another TKI or if they are switched to a inappropriate TKI or TKI dose. The NEXT-in-CML study provides for the first time robust demonstration of the clinical relevance of low-level mutations, supporting the incorporation of NGS-based BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening results in the clinical decision algorithms.

TO THE EDITOR: The Imatinib Suspension and Validation (ISAV) study1 is a multicenter trial of imatinib discontinuation (ID) among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in undetectable deep molecular remission (U-DMR). After 12 months of follow-up, 48% of patients relapsed (total n = 107), with the majority of relapses occurring within the first 9 months. An inverse relationship between patient age and risk of relapse was also observed at this timepoint. Here we report the final results of ISAV after a median follow-up of 49 months, as well as the dynamics of leukemic tumor load as determined by digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) in nonrelapsed patients. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01578213). Eligible patients were 18 years and older and had CML, either in chronic or accelerated phase, with U-DMR of at least 18 months’ duration and at least...

TO THE EDITOR: Rituximab is becoming the preferred second-line choice for steroid-refractory warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) and the first-line choice for cold agglutinin disease (CAD). However, rituximab is an expensive treatment that is not available worldwide; it is also not in

SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination have raised concerns in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). In fact, PNH patients carry an increased infectious risk secondary to complement inhibition treatment or associated bone marrow failure (BMF), and may therefore benefit from preventive strategies such as vaccinations. On the contrary, vaccines can be numbered among inflammatory complement amplifiers (e.g., infections, traumas, surgery), potentially triggering a disease exacerbation. In PNH patients on complement inhibitors, this phenomenon has been defined pharmacodynamic breakthrough hemolysis (BTH). Based on isolated reports of BTH following SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, we conducted a survey among 5 Italian reference centers to evaluate complications and BTH occurrence in PNH patients who completed the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedule from January, 2 2021 until the time of writing. Adverse events, hematologic and hemolytic parameters were recorded within 7-10 days before and after each dose of vaccine. A total of 67 patients (females/males 43/24, median age 47.6 years, range 21-90.5) were eligible for the analysis. According to the International PNH Interest Group classification, 45 patients suffered from hemolytic PNH, 20 from PNH in the context of BMF syndromes (aplastic anemia or myelodysplastic syndrome), and 2 from subclinical PNH. Fifty-five subjects (82%) were on regular complement inhibition therapy, i.e., eculizumab (N=35), ravulizumab (N=13), subcutaneous anti-C5 (N=3), anti-factor B (N=2) and ravulizumab + anti-factor D combination (N=2). Vaccines (Comirnaty/Pfizer-BioNTech N=53, mRNA-1273/Moderna N=12, and ChAdOx1 nCov-19/AstraZeneca N=2) were complessively well-tolerated, with 3 non-hematologic adverse events after the first dose (2 fever and 1 exercise-induced tachycardia, grade 1 according to CTCAE v5.0) and 2 after the second one (fever, accompanied by vomit in one patient, grade 1). During the observation period, 3 BTH and 1 hemolytic exacerbation were recorded (5.9% of patients), as detailed in Table 1. The most severe episode occurred in a young woman (Patient 3) on subcutaneous ravulizumab who experienced a hemoglobin (Hb) drop >2 g/dL, marked clinical signs of intravascular hemolysis and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase >1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) from baseline, which is considered a clinical BTH according to the criteria proposed by the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European group for Bone Marrow Transplantation. The patient required hospitalization for additional treatment with recombinant erythropoietin and anti-thombotic/bacterial prophylaxis. The second more severe BTH was registered in a male patient (Patient 1) on oral anti-factor B who experienced a Hb drop >2 g/dL without an overt hemolytic flare, and required hospitalization for intravenous antibiotic therapy (concomitant urinary tract infection). The remaining two patients experienced a subclinical BTH (Patient 2) and a hemolytic flare (Patient 4, not on complement inhibition). On the whole, a median delta variation from usual values of Hb and LDH of -25% (range -26+3%) and +80% (+18+105%) were observed, respectively. Of note, 3 episodes occurred after the second dose of vaccine, generally within 24-48 hours. Anti-complement drugs were not modified/discontinued in any of the 3 patients on regular treatment. Patients not experiencing BTH (94.1%) showed stable hematologic parameters after the first dose (Hb/LDH median delta variations from baseline -1%/+1%, range -14+12%/-32+40%) and the second dose of vaccine (Hb/LDH median delta variations from baseline +1%/0%, range -18+47%/-76+41%). Of note, 4 patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection completed the vaccination without any complication/PNH exacerbation. In conclusion, this survey shows that BTH/hemolytic flares following SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are observed in about 6% of PNH patients, may be clinically relevant but manageable, and should not discourage vaccination. BTH has been registered mostly few days after the second dose of vaccine, suggesting a "booster" effect favoring a higher inflammatory response. Watchful clinical and laboratory monitoring is advised, in order to promptly recognize severe hemolytic flares in both treated and naïve patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Fattizzo: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Kira: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Annexon: Consultancy; Momenta: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Bianchi: Agios pharmaceutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sica: Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy. Barcellini: Novartis: Other: Invited speaker, Research Funding; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Invited speaker, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Purpose The initial results of the APL0406 trial showed that the combination of all- trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is at least not inferior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in first-line therapy of low- or intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). We herein report the final analysis on the complete series of patients enrolled onto this trial. Patients and Methods The APL0406 study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III noninferiority trial. Eligible patients were adults between 18 and 71 years of age with newly diagnosed, low- or intermediate-risk APL (WBC at diagnosis ≤ 10 × 109/L). Overall, 276 patients were randomly assigned to receive ATRA-ATO or ATRA-CHT between October 2007 and January 2013. Results Of 263 patients evaluable for response to induction, 127 (100%) of 127 patients and 132 (97%) of 136 patients achieved complete remission (CR) in the ATRA-ATO and ATRA-CHT arms, respectively ( P = .12). After a median follow-up of 40.6 months, the event-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival at 50 months for patients in the ATRA-ATO versus ATRA-CHT arms were 97.3% v 80%, 1.9% v 13.9%, and 99.2% v 92.6%, respectively ( P < .001, P = .0013, and P = .0073, respectively). Postinduction events included two relapses and one death in CR in the ATRA-ATO arm and two instances of molecular resistance after third consolidation, 15 relapses, and five deaths in CR in the ATRA-CHT arm. Two patients in the ATRA-CHT arm developed a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. Conclusion These results show that the advantages of ATRA-ATO over ATRA-CHT increase over time and that there is significantly greater and more sustained antileukemic efficacy of ATO-ATRA compared with ATRA-CHT in low- and intermediate-risk APL.

COVID-19 pandemic has raised several concerns regarding patients with hematologic and immune-mediated diseases. It can be assumed that Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), both classic hemolytic and associated with aplastic anemia, particularly on treatment with complement inhibitors, may be more susceptible and have higher morbidity and mortality rates from COVID-19 than the general population. Italy has been heavily affected from the COVID-19 outbreak with the peak of contagions at the end of March 2020. As of July, 23 2020 the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 in Italy was 0.4% (1 case every 246 residents) (ranging from 0.06% - 1/1621- in Calabria to 0.9% - 1/106 - in Lombardy). We conducted a survey on 126 patients with PNH (77 females/49 males, median age 48 years, range 19-86) among 7 reference Italian centers in order to evaluate the occurrence and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 infection from the outbreak until the time of writing. According to International PNH Interest Group (IPIG) classification, 95 patients suffered from classic hemolytic PNH, 24 had associated bone marrow failures (aplastic anemia or myelodysplastic syndrome), and 7 had subclinical PNH (clone size Disclosures Barcellini: Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: invited speaker , Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: invited speaker , Research Funding; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bianchi:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Scientific Advisor. Notaro:Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

Background: Gilteritinib monotherapy provides a CR/CRh rate of 34% and a median event-free survival of 2.3 months in relapsed FLT3 mutant AML. Many AML patients (pts) who relapse after gilteritinib still express mutant FLT3 receptor and could potentially respond to FLT3 inhibition. Crenolanib is a type I, pan-FLT3 inhibitor which can be given as monotherapy or combined at full doses with standard salvage chemotherapy. Methods: We here report our experience with 7 consecutive pts who received crenolanib on compassionate basis after progressing on gilteritinib. IRB/local ethics approval was obtained prior to treatment for each pt and all pts signed informed consent forms. Results: Prior Treatment history: From Sep 2019 to July 2020, 7 consecutive pts with multiply relapsed FLT3-mutant AML who received compassionate use crenolanib after progressing on gilteritinib were identified. Four pts had relapsed after allogeneic HSCT (one pt had undergone two HSCT) and the other 3 were primary refractory despite multiple prior lines of therapy (range 2-5, median 4). Clinical presentation: At the time of treatment all pts had bone-marrow infiltration or greater than 20% circulating blasts. 1 pt did not undergo BM assessment prior to salvage chemotherapy and crenolanib but had 87% circulating blasts in the peripheral blood. One pt had cranial nerve palsy due to leukemic meningitis, another pt had extramedullary relapse in spleen and lymph nodes. Five pts had FLT3-ITD (1 of whom also had the gate-keeper FLT3-F691L mutations); 1 had FLT3-D835 and 1 had both FLT3-ITD and TKD. Crenolanib treatment: Crenolanib at 100mg TID was administered with intensive salvage therapy in 3 pts (FLAG-IDA in 2, HiDAC in 1). In the other 4 pts crenolanib was given with a palliative intent (with decitabine in 2, with azacytidine in 1 and as monotherapy in 1). Tolerability of crenolanib: Crenolanib has been clinically well tolerated, with mild nausea and vomiting reported in 3 pts which was controlled by antiemetics without causing any drug interruptions. Two pts had elevated transaminases (which resolved as concomitant medications were discontinued). There were no cardiac toxicities, pericardial effusion, fluid retention or weight gain. Response to crenolanib: At the time of this abstract, 5 of the 7 pts remain on crenolanib from a period of 18-160 days. Six of 7 pts reported clinical benefit with crenolanib. Of the 3 pts being treated with curative intent, the pt with extramedullary disease in the spleen and lymph nodes had complete resolution of her AML by PET scan. She also had exhibited clearance of bone-marrow blasts with full count recovery and became FLT3 negative. The pt with FLT3-F691 mutation and cranial nerve palsy due to CNS leukemia had clearance of CNS blasts and improvement in cranial nerve function after HIDAC, crenolanib, and intrathecal cytarabine; this patient achieved morphologic leukemia free state and FLT3 negativity in the BM. A 22-year-old pt treated with FLAG-IDA has only received 18 days of crenolanib at time of data cutoff. All pts treated with curative intent continue on crenolanib. Of the 4 pts treated with palliative intent, the pt with mutant TP53 had no benefit following crenolanib and azacytidine and died within two months. One patient, who had had two prior HSCTs, had 90% reduction in circulating blasts with azacytidine + crenolanib, but chose to discontinue treatment after 9 days. The other 2 pts continue on crenolanib 2 and 5 months after starting treatment. Conclusion: With the widespread availability of gilteritinib, more pts are now in need of treatment options after gilteritinib refractoriness or treatment failure. These pts often have resistant clones due to either acquisition of the gate-keeper FLT3-F691 mutation or RAS mutant clones. In this consecutive case series of 7 post-gilteritinib pts, treated in US and Europe, crenolanib can be given at full doses in combination with intensive salvage chemotherapy or decitabine/azacitidine. The individual-patient-level experience suggests crenolanib could effectively clear FLT3-ITD and variant FLT3-TKD mutations in pts progressing from multiple lines of treatment including gilteritinib. Clinical trials combining crenolanib with salvage chemotherapy in relapsed and refractory AML with FLT3 mutations are ongoing. More information about crenolanib compassionate use program is available by emailing compassionate@arogpharma.com. Disclosures Goldberg: Celgene: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptose: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; Celularity: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding. Geyer:Amgen: Research Funding. Pardee:Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Rafael: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau. Grunwald:Cardinal Health: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Premier: Consultancy; Premier: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy; Premier: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Cardinal Health: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cardinal Health: Consultancy. Wang:Arog Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Pathan:Arog Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Messahel:AROG Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment.

The hypomethylating agent Decitabine (DAC) is a valuable treatment option in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), particularly in elderly patients (pts) not suitable for intensive chemotherapy (CHT). However, limited data are available about efficacy and safety of DAC in clinical practice.We retrospectively reviewed data of 104 AML pts treated with DAC in eight Italian Hematological Centers from 2015 to 2017. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAC in older AML pts outside of clinical trial. Seventy-five (75%) pts received DAC as first line treatment (Cohort 1) and 29 pts as salvage therapy (Cohort 2). All pts received a DAC schedule of 20 mg/sqm IV for 5-days, every 28 days. The median age was 72.5 years (74 in cohort 1 and 66 in cohort 2) and 16% of pts had an ECOG performance status2 at the start of DAC treatment (with non-significant difference in the two cohorts). The cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) was6 in 27% of pts. Forty-five pts (43%) had secondary AML. Bone marrow blast count was30% in 64% of patients (67/104). In the relapsed cohort 17/29 (59%) patients were treated with DAC after conventional CHT, 5/29 (17%) after allo-SCT and 7/29 (24%) after azacitidine therapy.A total of 469 DAC cycles were given to the 104 pts with a median of 3 cycles (range 1-21) and 45/104 (43%) pts received4 cycles. The Overall Response Rate (ORR = Complete Remission-CR plus Partial Remission-PR) was 33%, significantly higher in Cohort 1 (42%) compared to Cohort 2 (14%) (p = 0.009). The median duration of response was 6 months (range 1-20). In Cohort 1 the best response (CR or PR) was obtained between 3th and 6th cycle. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, achievement of CR or PR (HR = 0.78; p = 0.0004), CIRS 6 (HR = 0.9; p = 0.04) and complex karyotype (HR = 0.8; p = 0.03) were significant predictors of better overall survival (OS). Median OS from the start of DAC therapy was 11 months for the whole population with a significant OS advantage in Cohort 1 (median OS 12.7 mths vs 6.3 mths; p = 0.003); median OS was significantly longer in responders compared to non-responders (22.6 mths vs 5.7 mths; p 0.0001). At the last follow-up, 56 patients (54%) are still alive and 48 (46%) are dead (71% due to disease progression). The most common toxicities were myelosuppression and documented infectious complications that occurred mainly during the first 4 cycles.These data confirm the efficacy (ORR 33%) and the acceptable safety profile of DAC in the real life management of AML in elderly pts unsuitable for intensive CHT, with a significant better performance in first line therapy (ORR 42%, median OS 12.7 mths). The efficacy of DAC, both in first line and as salvage therapy, may probably be improved with combined treatment strategies and/or with different DAC schedules that could increase its anti-leukemic effect.

Introduction. Discontinuation (D/C) of Imatinib or other TKIs in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) represents an important issue in the management of this disease. It is generally accepted that relapse develops (and treatment must be resumed) when patients (pts) lose Major Molecular Remission (MMR), i.e. when the amount of the BCR-ABL1 transcript, measured in peripheral blood by RT-PCR, exceeds 0.1 %. The Imatinib Suspension And Validation (ISAV) study, which started in 2011, enrolled pts with CML treated with Imatinib who showed no evidence of BCR-ABL1 transcript for at least 18 months before enrollment. Methods. A digital PCR (dPCR) for BCR-ABL1 was performed at the time of Imatinib D/C while a second dPCR was performed when non relapsed patients exited the study, 36 months later. dPCR experiments were performed by the QX200 system (BioRad) in the same lab and using the same methodology. The BCR-ABL1 fusion and ABL1 transcripts were quantified using DigiDrop P210 MasterMix and DigiDrop P210 Positive Control (Bioclarma), according to manufacturer's protocol. The target concentration in each sample was expressed as percentage of BCR-ABL1/ABL1. Results. A total of 107 pts were enrolled in the ISAV study. Relapses occurred in 54 pts (52%); among the 53 non relapsed pts, 41 (77%) presented at least one positive RT-PCR result following Imatinib D/C, and only 12 (23%) maintained PCR negativity throughout the duration of the study. Among the non-relapsed pts dPCR performed at treatment D/C showed positivity in 20.6% of cases (95% confidence interval [C.I.] 9-36%), while 91.1% of pts (95%, C.I. 80-97%) evaluated 36 months later showed a positive dPCR value, although no patient resumed treatment. The evaluation of non relapsed pts by dPCR showed that mean values at D/C were 0.00143% +/- 0.0006 (SE); when tested at study exit, the same pts showed average dPCR values of 0.0115 % +/- 0.002. This difference is statistically highly significant and corresponds to a change of approximately 1 log in the residual tumor burden: from 2x107 to 2x108 cells. There was no correlation between the results of RT-PCR performed during the study and the dPCR status at study exit: pts who tested negative by RT-PCR during the study were uniformly negative in dPCR at D/C but tested positive at study exit in 83.3% of cases; pts who showed at least on positive RT-PCR during the study showed positivity by dPCR in 25% at D/C and in 89.3% at study exit. Finally, half of the pts who tested negative by dPCR at study exit showed dPCR positivity when tested at the time of Imatinib D/C. Conclusions. These results show that during a three year period, the D/C of Imatinib led to the increase of approximately 1 log in the tumour burden of non-relapsed pts, although none of them lost MMR and resumed treatment. These data strongly indicate the need for a long-term monitoring of pts who D/C Imatinib; they also suggest that the functional status of residual CML cells rather than their number could represent the critical factor to predict the tumour load present after 3 years of Imatinib D/C. Disclosures Le Coutre: Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Elena:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Assouline:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stagno:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Iurlo:Novartis: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Incyte: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: Speaker Honoraria. Kim:Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Il-Yang co.: Research Funding. Fava:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Gambacorti-Passerini:Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Background. Clinical course of the novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is extremely heterogeneous, and infected individuals may be asymptomatic or develop acute respiratory manifestations. Elderly people and patients with pre-existing comorbidities, including malignancies, may be at higher risk due to their immunological impairment. On the other hand, still limited evidence suggests that some target drugs used to treat hematological cancers, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), may have a direct antiviral action or an indirect immunomodulatory effect on the abnormal inflammatory host response to SARS-CoV-2. Aims. To describe the prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Methods.This is an ongoing prospective study ideated and conducted in the Centers of the regional network Rete Ematologica Veneta (REV). According to the Italian Ministry of Health data as of Jul 22, 2020, prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Veneto, as documented by molecular test on pharyngeal swab, was 0.4%. For comparison, two other centers from Regions with lower prevalence (Lazio and Friuli-Venezia Giulia) were included. All consecutive CML patients coming to the participating Centers were offered to participate to the study, which was approved by local IRBs. Patients in Treatment Free Remission (TFR) phase (i.e. not taking TKI at the time of pandemic) were included as a control group. After collecting information about risk factors for COVID-19 (travels, work exposure, cohabitation with infected subjects) and respiratory or general symptoms experienced from mid Feb 2020, patients were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and/or IgG antibodies through a immunochromatographic qualitative assay (COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette, Menarini Diagnostics, IT; sensitivity IgG 97.2%, IgM 87.9%, specificity IgG/IgM 100%). Patients with positive results underwent a pharyngeal swab for molecular detection of the virus. Results. From May 18 to Jul 29, 2020 a total of 339 patients were enrolled (238 from REV centers and 101 from other centers). Males were 183 (54%), median age was 63.2 (range 26.5-93) years. Median time from CML diagnosis was 8 (range 0.1-29.6) years. The majority of patients were in frontline TKI treatment (n=174, 51.3%), and the remaining were in 2ndline (n=80, 23.6%), 3rdor further line of treatment (n=35, 10.3%), or in TFR (n=50, 14.7%). The type of TKI currently assumed was imatinib (n=134, 39.5%), nilotinib (n=63, 18.6%), dasatinib (n=52, 15.4%), bosutinib (n= 24, 7.1%), ponatinib (n=14, 4.1%) or experimental (n=2, 0.6%). The majority of patients was in major (n=79, 23.3%) or deep molecular response (n=204, 60.2%). Thirteen and 3 patients declared close contact with COVID-19 infected individuals at work and/or at home, respectively. The frequency of newly onset or worsening symptoms during the last months was as follows: anosmia (2.4%), ageusia (2.1%), cough (4.7%), pharyngitis (2.6%), dyspnea (2.4%), fever (3.2%), headache (7.7%), asthenia (13.6%), arthralgia (14.9%), dizziness (6.5%), nausea/vomiting (2.7%), and diarrhea (4.4%). Five patients out of the 238 in the REV cohort (2.1%) had a positive IgG test, and two of them were also IgM-positive. All resulted negative at swab performed after the serological assay. They were 4 males and 1 female, aged between 53 and 72 years. One of them, in treatment with nilotinib, had a symptomatic infection in early March, confirmed at that time by molecular tests, and reported close contact with infected subjects both at work and at home. All the other patients (2 in treatment with imatinib, 1 with nilotinib and 1 with bosutinib) reported no or only mild symptoms and had not performed diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 before. Anosmia, ageusia and fever were the only symptoms significantly associated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive test (p Conclusions. We reported for the first time the serological prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in CML patients. Serological studies in the general Italian population are ongoing and will be used to make comparisons with our cohort. Prospective enrollment in the present study is ongoing and updated results will be presented at the Meeting. Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Fondazione Cariverona (ENACT Project). Disclosures Semenzato: Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Pizzolo:janssen: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Krampera:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Once the diagnostic suspicion of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has been raised, international guidelines recommend prompt initiation of tailored therapy and supportive care, while awaiting for genetic confirmation of the diagnosis, and the identification of the specific PML/RARA isoform by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Depending on the PML break point, usually located within intron 6, exon 6, or intron 3, different PML/RARA transcript isoforms may be generated, that is, long (bcr1), variant (bcr2), and short (bcr3), respectively. We report here the characterization of three APL cases harboring atypical PML/RARA transcripts, which were not clearly detectable after standard RT-PCR amplification. In all three cases, clinical, morphological, and immunophenotypic features were consistent with APL. Direct sequencing allowed the identification of atypical break points within the PML and RARA genes. Then, we designed a patient-specific quantitative real-time PCR for the atypical transcripts, which allowed for specific quantitative evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) during follow-up. Despite the rarity of APL cases with an atypical PML/RARA fusion, our study indicates that an integrated laboratory approach, employing several diagnostic techniques is crucial to timely diagnose APL. This approach allows prompt initiation of specific targeted treatment and reliable MRD monitoring in atypical APL cases.

Approximately 40% of patients affected by core binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ultimately die from the disease. Few prognostic markers have been identified. We reviewed 192 patients with CBF AML, treated with curative intent (age, 15-79 years) in 11 Italian institutions. Overall, 10-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival were 63.9%, 54.8%, and 49.9%, respectively; patients with the t(8;21) and inv(16) chromosomal rearrangements exhibited significant differences at diagnosis. Despite similar high complete remission (CR) rate, patients with inv(16) experienced superior DFS and a high chance of achieving a second CR, often leading to prolonged OS also after relapse. We found that a complex karyotype (i.e., ≥4 cytogenetic anomalies) affected survival, even if only in univariate analysis; the KIT D816 mutation predicted worse prognosis, but only in patients with the t(8;21) rearrangement, whereas FLT3 mutations had no prognostic impact. We then observed increasingly better survival with more intense first-line therapy, in some high-risk patients including autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In multivariate analysis, age, severe thrombocytopenia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, and failure to achieve CR after induction independently predicted longer OS, whereas complex karyotype predicted shorter OS only in univariate analysis. The achievement of minimal residual disease negativity predicted better OS and DFS. Long-term survival was observed also in a minority of elderly patients who received intensive consolidation. All considered, we identified among CBF AML patients a subgroup with poorer prognosis who might benefit from more intense first-line treatment.

Introduction Some retrospective studies in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant Philadephia-positive (Ph+) leukemia patients (pts) have suggested that deep sequencing (DS) may provide a more accurate picture of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation status as compared to conventional sequencing (CS). However, the frequency and clinical relevance of low burden mutations remains to be explored prospectively in large series of unselected pts. In addition, the implementation of routine BCR-ABL1 DS in multiple molecular diagnostic laboratories has never been attempted. These open issues led us to design a multi-center, multi-laboratory prospective study ('NEXT-IN-CML') aimed to assess the feasibility, performance and informativity of DS for BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening. Aims The first phase of the study was aimed to establish a network of 5 reference labs sharing a standardized DS workflow, a joint database for clinical and mutational data storage and a common pipeline of data analysis, interpretation and clinical reporting. The second phase of the study, involving 54 Italian Hematology Units, is aimed to assess the frequency and clinical significance of low burden mutations detectable by DS by prospective collection and analysis of samples from chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) pts who exhibit failure (F) or warning (W) responses and relapsed Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) pts. Methods A PCR and an amplicon DS protocol already set up and optimized for the Roche GS Junior in the framework of the IRON II international consortium was adopted. In the first phase, 5 batches of blinded cDNA samples were prepared and shipped to evaluate individual lab performances. The batches included archival samples with known BCR-ABL1 mutation status as assessed by CS and serial dilutions of BaF3 T315I+ cells in BaF3 unmutated cells, simulating mutation loads of 20% down to 1%. In the ongoing second phase prospectively, consecutively collected CML and Ph+ ALL samples are being analyzed in parallel by CS and DS. Clinical history and follow-up data are used for correlations. Results In the first phase of the study, 312/320 amplicons were successfully generated and sequenced. A median of 124,686 (range, 48,181-170,687) high quality reads were obtained across the 5 labs. Median number of forward and reverse reads was 1,757 (range 884-7,838), with no coverage dropouts for any amplicon or index. Comparison of observed vs expected mutations showed that 76/78 evaluable samples were accurately scored. In the remaining two, the analysis software failed to detect the 35bp insertion ('35INS') commonly detectable between exons 8 and 9. Quantitation of point mutation burden was highly reproducible across the entire range of frequencies, from 100% to 1%. The second phase of the study has started in Jan 2016. As of Jul 31st, a total of 106 consecutive pts (CML, n=96; Ph+ ALL, n=10) have been enrolled. The present analysis focuses on the first 75 CML pts (60 F and 15 W), for whom sequencing results are currently available (analysis of the entire population of patients enrolled up to Nov 2016 will be presented at the meeting). Clinically actionable mutations have been detected in 10/75 (14%) pts by CS and in 20/75 pts (27%) by DS. Notably, among the 10 pts positive for clinically actionable mutations by DS but not by CS, 3 had a low burden T315I (2 F [dasatinib, imatinib] and 1 W [dasatinib]). In 5 additional pts negative for mutations by CS (3 F and 2 W), DS identified multiple low burden mutations with unknown IC50, suggesting that the cooperation of individually 'weak' mutants may be a new mechanism underlying reduced TKI efficacy. Longitudinal analysis and follow-up of pts are shaping the clinical significance of different types of low burden mutations and will be presented. Conclusions The 'NEXT-in-CML' study is demonstrating that DS of BCR-ABL1 can successfully be implemented in national lab networks and is an important step forward towards routine use of this technology. We have now adapted the protocol for both the Ion Torrent PGM and the Illumina Miseq platforms. For a minimum of 15 samples per sequencing run, DS costs are estimated to equal those of CS (cost per sample, reagents only: ≈100€ for PGM (314 chip) and Miseq (nano kit v2) vs ≈95€ for CS) with comparable turnaround times for delivery of results. Our study is also contributing useful data for the clinical interpretation of DS findings. Disclosures Soverini: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Castagnetti:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ciceri:MolMed SpA: Consultancy. Breccia:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Di Raimondo:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Bassan:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavo:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Saglio:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Martinelli:Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy.

We evaluate the long-term results of a prospective clinical study enrolling more than 100 adult patients with Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia. Depending on extent of disease, treatment consisted of six to eight rituximab infusions and four to six courses of intensive chemotherapy (attenuated in patients aged >55 years) with high-dose methotrexate, fractionated ifosfamide/cyclophosphamide, other drugs in rotation, and intrathecal chemoprophylaxis. One-hundred five patients were treated (median age 47 years, range 17-78 years); 48% had Burkitt leukemia, 25% were older than 60 years, 37% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score >1, and 14% were positive for human immunodeficiency virus. The complete response rate and 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 79%, 67% and 75%, respectively, ranging from 100% to 45% for survival (P=0.000) and from 100% to 60% for disease-free survival (P=0.01) in patients with low, intermediate and high adapted International Prognostic Index scores. In multivariate analysis, only age (≤ versus >60 years) and performance status (0-1 versus >1) retained prognostic significance, identifying three risk groups with overall and disease-free survival probabilities of 88% and 87.5%, 57% and 70.5%, 20% and 28.5% (P=0.0000 and P=0.0001), respectively. The relapse rate was only 7% in patients treated with an intercycle interval ≤ 25 days. This regimen achieved 100% curability in patients with low adapted International Prognostic Index scores (21% of total), and very close to 90% in patients aged ≤ 60 years with performance score 0-1 (48% of total). Rapid diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia with prompt referral of patients to prevent clinical deterioration, and careful supervision of treatment without chemotherapy delay can achieve outstanding therapeutic results. ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT01290120.

Treatment of patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) relapsed/refractory (R/R) to conventional treatments is particularly challenging. The combination of bendamustine and cytarabine has demonstrated distinct and synergistic mechanisms of action in preclinical studies on cell lines and primary tumor cells of several B-cell lymphomas, including 17p deleted or TP53 mutated CLL. The efficacy of rituximab (375 mg/m(2) , Day 1), plus bendamustine (70 mg/m(2) , days 1-2), and cytarabine (800 mg/m(2) , Day 1-3; R-BAC), every 28 days for up to four courses, was evaluated in a pilot trial enrolling 13 patients with very selected high-risk R/R CLL. All patients (median age 60 years, range 53-74) had symptomatic Binet stage B or C active disease requiring treatment, were characterized by adverse cytogenetics (17p deletion, 11q deletion, or both), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region, and were heavily pretreated (1-5, median three previous lines). Overall, R-BAC was well tolerated with limited non-hematological toxicity. Major toxicities were transient Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 84% and 85% of patients, respectively. Overall response rate (OR) was 84%, including complete and partial response in 38% and 46% of patients, respectively. Patients with 17p deletion had an OR of 78%. After a median follow-up of 17 months, median progression-free survival was 16 months while median overall survival (OS) was not reached (1-year OS: 75 ± 13%). R-BAC is an active regimen in R/R heavily pretreated high-risk patients with CLL, representing an option for the treatment of patients that are usually refractory to standard therapy.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical features, prognostic factors, and efficacy of treatments in patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with a leukemic presentation at onset of the disease. In order to do this, a retrospective multicenter study was performed from 2005-2011 in 28 Italian hematology divisions in which 43 cases were collected. Forty-one patients received an induction therapy, consisting of an acute myeloid leukemia-type regimen in 26 patients (60%) and acute lymphoid leukemia/lymphoma-type regimen in 15 patients (35%). Six patients (14%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Seventeen patients (41%) achieved a complete remission: seven after acute myeloid leukemia-type treatment and 10 after an acute lymphoid leukemia/lymphoma-type regimen, with a significant advantage for acute lymphoid leukemia/lymphoma-type chemotherapy (P=0.02). Relapse occurred in six of the 17 patients (35%) who achieved complete remission, more frequently after acute lymphoid leukemia/lymphoma-type chemotherapy. The median overall survival was 8.7 months (range, 0.2-32.9). The patients treated with an acute myeloid leukemia-type regimen had an overall survival of 7.1 months (range, 0.2-19.5), whereas that of the patients receiving acute lymphoid leukemia/lymphoma-type chemotherapy was 12.3 months (range, 1-32.9) (P=0.02). The median overall survival of the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients was 22.7 months (range, 12-32.9), and these patients had a significant survival advantage compared to the non-transplanted patients (median 7.1 months, 0.2-21.3; P=0.03). In conclusion, blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with bone-marrow involvement is an aggressive subtype of high-risk acute leukemia. The rarity of this disease does not enable prospective clinical trials to identify the better therapeutic strategy, which, at present, is based on clinicians' experience.

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation screening has been shown to enable greater accuracy and sensitivity and straightforward identification of compound mutants (CM) as compared to Sanger sequencing (seq). However, the prevalence of CMs has never been assessed in prospective studies, and although in vitro data suggest that many of them may be challenging for all tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) including ponatinib, attempts to correlate such data with in vivo responses have never been made. To address these issues, we have reviewed the results of routine NGS-based BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening performed over the past 3 years. Between 2015 and 2018, we have prospectively used NGS to analyze a consecutive series of 751 Ph+ leukemia patients (pts) on TKI therapy who were eligible for BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening according to ELN/NCCN/ESMO recommendations. The study population included 664 chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) pts with failure or warning response (chronic phase [CP], n=593; accelerated or blastic phase [AP/BP], n=71) and 87 Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) pts with relapsed/refractory disease. NGS of ≈400bp amplicons generated by nested RT-PCR was performed on a Roche GS Junior (until April 2017) or on an Illumina MiSeq (from May 2017 on) using custom protocols whose accuracy, sensitivity and reproducibility was checked by national and international (EUTOS) control rounds. Read alignment and variant calling was done using the AmpSuite software (SmartSeq srl), with a lower detection limit set to 3%. Cis or trans configuration of mutation pairs, indicating CMs or polyclonality, respectively, was determined correcting for the likelihood of PCR recombination. The 35INS insertion/truncation mutant was excluded from the analysis. NGS identified mutations in the BCR-ABL1 KD in a total of 313/664 (47%) CML pts (255/593 [43%] CP-CML and 58/71 [82%] AP/BP-CML) and 69/87 (79%) Ph+ ALL pts. Ninety-one percent of the mutations could be recognized as conferring resistance to at least one TKI on the basis of publicly available IC50 data or published reports. In 42/593 (7%) CP-CML, 6/71 (8.5%) AP/BP-CML and 12/87 (14%) Ph+ ALL pts, low burden mutations (i.e., mutations carried by a proportion of transcripts 15% - hence detectable by Sanger seq). Fifty-five (9.2%) CP-CML, 51 (72%) AP/BP-CML and 56 (49%) Ph+ ALL pts had ≥2 mutations (CP-CML: 1-5 mutations; AP/BP-CML: 1-6 mutations; Ph+ ALL: 1-13 mutations). Identification of CMs in pts with ≥2 mutations was fully possible (i.e., all the candidate pairs mapped within a distance of 400bp) in 71% of cases and partially possible (i.e., some, but not all the candidate pairs mapped within a distance of 400bp) in another 12% of cases. A total of 86 CMs (85 double and 1 triple) in 73 pts (21 [3.5%] CP-CML, 23 [32%] AP/BP-CML and 29 [37%] Ph+ ALL pts) could be catalogued (Figure 1A). All but two (T315I+D276G, M244V+E255K) were detected in pts who had received ≥2 TKIs and all included at least a 2nd-generation TKI-resistant mutation. The most frequent CMs were T315I+E255K, T315I+E255V, T315I+F359V, F317L+Y253H (Figure 1A). The triple CM, detected in a ponatinib-resistant pt, was F317I+Y253F+Q252H. Correlation of IC50 data with in vivo responses (the TKIs pts were clinically resistant to) confirmed only partially in vitro predictions (Figure 1B). In particular, although ponatinib was shown in vitro to be poorly effective against several CMs, only the T315I+E255V was consistently found to be associated with ponatinib failure. In conclusion, our results in a large unselected series of TKI-resistant pts analyzed by NGS show that:CMs are relatively infrequent in CP-CML, but may be a relevant issue in AP/BP-CML and Ph+ ALL;among pts with multiple mutations, those who have failed 1 line of therapy have most often polyclonality, whereas those who have failed ≥2 lines of therapy may have CMs or polyclonality;in vitro predictions of sensitivity and insensitivity based on IC50 data should be regarded with caution. In particular, the only compound mutant that we consistently found to be associated with ponatinib failure was the T315I+E255V. Supported by EUTOS 2016. Disclosures Soverini: Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte Biosciences: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Pagano:Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Basilea: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Gugliotta:Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Castagnetti:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Angelucci:Roche Italy: Other: Local (national) advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Chair Steering Comiittee TELESTO Protocol; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Chair DMC; Jazz Pharmaceuticals Italy: Other: Local ( national) advisory board; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (MA) and CRISPR CAS9 Therapeutics AG (CH): Other: Chair DMC. Martinelli:Abbvie: Consultancy; Ariad/Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy. Cavo:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction. It is known that imatinib can be safely discontinued in patients (pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) with minimal residual disease. Here we report an update of the Imatinib Suspension And Validation (ISAV) study at 79 months (mts) from study initiation to provide long term follow up data. Aims. The ISAV study aims to validate the capability of digital PCR (dPCR) to predict relapses after imatinib discontinuation in CML pts with negative Q-RT-PCR and to evaluate relapse rate, time to recurrence, survival and the impact of imatinib treatment on Quality of Life (QoL). Methods. This study involves 15 sites, 10 in Italy and 1 in each of the following countries: Germany, Spain, The Netherlands, Canada and Israel. CML pts (chronic or accelerated phase) treated with imatinib for more than 2 years and in complete molecular remission (CMR) were eligible. Patients had to be in CMR for at least 18 mts, with a minimum of 3 Q-RT-PCR performed at their own sites. After discontinuation of imatinib therapy, Q-RT-PCR was performed monthly (mts 1-6), bimonthly for 36 mts and then every 6 mts for additional 2 years, to assess the maintenance of the molecular remission. The loss of molecular remission was defined as two consecutive positive Q-RT-PCR tests with at least one BCR-ABL/ABL value above 0.1%. Patients losing molecular remission resumed imatinib treatment at the same dosage used before interruption. dPCR was performed at screening and at 36 mts for those pts who were still in remission. Patients' QoL during imatinib discontinuation/resumption was evaluated through the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results. The ISAV study enrolled 112 pts with a median follow-up time of 60.0 mts [95% CI: 59.6-60.6] for pts who do not relapsed; 66.1% of them completed the study as per protocol. The 58.9% of pts were male and 37.4% were aged 65 or older; median duration of imatinib treatment was 103.2 mts with median duration of CMR of 25.6 mts before imatinib discontinuation. At 79 mts from imatinib discontinuation, 56 pts of the 107 eligible ones relapsed and resumed imatinib with a relapse rate of 52.3% [95%CI: 20.4-32.6]; 69.6% of them relapsed in the first 9 mts. Of the 52 not-relapsed pts, 40 (76.9%) regained Q-RT-PCR positivity without losing MMR. In this latter group 2 pts experienced late relapses, at 30.6 and 45.5 mts respectively. A loss of CCyR occurred in 13 pts (23.6%): 10/13 CCyR losses were recovered, the remaining 3 were not assessed for response. No case of CML progression or resistance to imatinib was observed. After the resumption of imatinib the median time to MMR/CMR was 1.8 [95% CI: 1.0-2.0] mts. No significant correlation between relapse and previous duration of imatinib treatment, use of interferon, time to CCyR, Sokal score or duration of CMR was identified, while an inverse relationship between pts age and risk of relapse was evident. dPCR results before imatinib discontinuation showed that 23.4% of pts were positive and 76.6% negative at the time of discontinuation, with a Negative Predictive Value ratio (dPCR/Q-RT-PCR) of 1.1 [95%CI: 0.99-1.22]. At 36 mts from imatinib discontinuation 80.4% [95%CI: 30.6-50.4] of the pts tested were positive in dPCR. Moreover, the results of dPCR performed at imatinib discontinuation and age together can predict the risk of relapse: pts with less than 45 years and with a positive dPCR had the highest risk of relapse (100%) as opposed to pts ≥45 years and with negative dPCR (36.1%). The analysis of QoL evidenced a statistically significant improvement in the general well-being and symptoms scales at 1 month after imatinib discontinuation, particularly with regard to nausea, diarrhea, fatigue and insomnia (p Conclusions. At 79 mts from the beginning of the study, 52.3% of pts relapsed, with 24% loosing CCyR. The majority of relapses occurred in the first 9 mts after discontinuation however late relapses were also observed, up to the 4th year. Therefore, pts who discontinue imatinib should be monitored for a long period of time, especially if they show positive PCR values after discontinuation. All relapsed pts including those who lost CCyR regained their original response after restarting TKI. Age Disclosures le Coutre: Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Abruzzese:BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Assouline:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding. Kim:Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Ilyang: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Gambacorti-Passerini:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy.

After the identification of discrete relapse-risk categories in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) receiving all-trans retinoic and idarubicin (AIDA)–like therapies, the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) designed a protocol for newly diagnosed APL (AIDA-2000) in which postremission treatment was risk-adapted. Patients with low/intermediate risk received remission at 3 anthracycline-based consolidation courses, whereas high-risk patients received the same schedule as in the previous, non–risk-adapted AIDA-0493 trial including cytarabine. In addition, all patients in the AIDA-2000 received all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) for 15 days during each consolidation. After induction, 600 of 636 (94.3%) and 420 of 445 (94.4%) patients achieved complete remission in the AIDA-0493 and AIDA-2000, respectively. The 6-year overall survival and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rates were 78.1% versus 87.4% (P = .001) and 27.7% versus 10.7% (P < .0001). Significantly lower CIR rates for patients in the AIDA-2000 were most evident in the high-risk group (49.7% vs 9.3%, respectively, P < .0001). Our data confirm that anthracycline-based consolidation is at least equally effective as cytarabine-containing regimens for low-/intermediate-risk patients and suggest that a risk-adapted strategy including ATRA for consolidation improves outcome in newly diagnosed APL. Furthermore, our results highlight the role of cytarabine coupled to anthracyclines and ATRA during consolidation in the high-risk group. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT 001064570.

Treatment of acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) with arsenic trioxide (ATO) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is highly effective first-line therapy, although approximately 5-10% of patients relapse. Tamibarotene is a synthetic retinoid with activity in APL patients who relapse after chemotherapy and ATRA, but has not been studied in relapse after treatment with ATO and ATRA. We report on a phase II study of tamibarotene in adult patients with relapsed or refractory APL after treatment with ATRA and ATO (n = 14). Participants were treated with tamibarotene (6 mg/m(2) /d) during induction and for up to six cycles of consolidation. The overall response rate was 64% (n = 9), the rate of complete cytogenetic response was 43% (n = 6) and the rate of complete molecular response was 21% (n = 3). Relapse was frequent with 7 of 9 responders relapsing after a median of 4·6 months (range 1·6-26·8 months). The median event-free survival (EFS) was 3·5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-8·6 months] and the median overall survival (OS) was 9·5 months (95% CI 5·9-13·1 months). These results demonstrate that tamibarotene has activity in relapsed APL after treatment with ATO and ATRA and further studies using tamibarotene as initial therapy and in combination with ATO are warranted.

Between August 1993 and March 2003, 130 consecutive multiple myeloma (MM) patients eligible for high-dose treatment were offered a program including up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after conditioning with 200 mg/m(2) melphalan followed by a second ASCT in case of relapse or progression. A total of 107 (82%) patients completed the first ASCT. The best response obtained after ASCT was complete response (CR) 23%, very good partial response (VGPR) 28%, partial response (PR) 42%, and minimal response (MR) 7%. Median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 65.4 and 27.7 months, respectively. Relapse or progression occurred in 70 patients; 26 received a second ASCT (with a median time of 20.4 months from first ASCT). A major response (> or =PR) was obtained in 69% of these patients. Median OS and EFS after the second ASCT were 38.1 and 14.8 months. Treatment-related mortality was 1.9% after the first ASCT but no deaths occurred after the second. Our experience suggests that elective up-front single ASCT followed by second ASCT after relapse or progression is a safe and effective global strategy to treat MM patients.

Shortly before the all- trans retinoic acid (ATRA) era, the GIMEMA cooperative group initiated a randomized study comparing idarubicin (IDA) alone with IDA plus arabinosylcytosine (Ara-C) as induction treatment in patients with newly diagnosed hypergranular acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Of the 257 patients evaluable for induction treatment, 131 were randomized to receive IDA alone (arm A) and 126 to receive IDA + Ara-C (arm B). Treatment in arm A consisted of 10 mg/m2 IDA daily for 6 consecutive days, whereas in arm B it consisted of 12 mg/m2 IDA daily for 4 days combined with 200 mg/m2 Ara-C daily in continuous infusion for 7 days. Once in complete remission (CR), patients received 3 consolidation courses of standard chemotherapy, and those still in CR at the end of the consolidation were randomized to receive or not receive 1 mg/kg 6-mercaptopurine daily and intramuscular injections of 0.25 mg/kg methotrexate weekly for 2 years. Overall, 100 (76.3%) patients in arm A and 84 (66.6%) patients in arm B achieved CR ( P = NS). Event-free survival (EFS) rates were 35% and 23% for patients in arm A and arm B, respectively ( P = .0352). Multivariate analysis revealed that EFS was favorably influenced by induction treatment with IDA alone ( P = .0352) and unfavorably influenced by white blood cell (WBC) counts greater than 3000/μL ( P = .0001) and increasing age ( P = .0251). These results indicate that anthracycline monochemotherapy with IDA favorably influences the EFS of patients with newly diagnosed hypergranular APL.

The clinical outcome, response to treatment, and occurrence of acute complications were retrospectively investigated in 308 primary autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) cases and correlated with serological characteristics and severity of anemia at onset. Patients had been followed up for a median of 33 months (range 12-372); 60% were warm AIHA, 27% cold hemagglutinin disease, 8% mixed, and 5% atypical (mostly direct antiglobulin test negative). The latter 2 categories more frequently showed a severe onset (hemoglobin [Hb] levels ≤6 g/dL) along with reticulocytopenia. The majority of warm AIHA patients received first-line steroid therapy only, whereas patients with mixed and atypical forms were more frequently treated with 2 or more therapy lines, including splenectomy, immunosuppressants, and rituximab. The cumulative incidence of relapse was increased in more severe cases (hazard ratio 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-6.57 for Hb ≤6 g/dL; P < .001). Thrombotic events were associated with Hb levels ≤6 g/dL at onset, intravascular hemolysis, and previous splenectomy. Predictors of a fatal outcome were severe infections, particularly in splenectomized cases, acute renal failure, Evans syndrome, and multitreatment (4 or more lines). The identification of severe and potentially fatal AIHA in a largely heterogeneous disease requires particular experienced attention by clinicians.

Background: We recently showed that the combination of ATRA and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is at least not inferior and possibly superior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in the front-line management of low/intermediate risk APL (Italian-German APL 0406 trial; Lo-Coco et al., NEJM 2013). We report herein on the extended and final series of 276 patients (162 were in the previous report) with the last case being enrolled into the study in January 2013. Methods: The APL0406 study was a prospective, open-label, randomized intergroup trial conducted by the Italian GIMEMA and the German SAL and AMLSG study groups. Eligible patients were adults aged 18- Results: A total of 254 patients were evaluable for response to induction. CR was achieved in 122/122 (100%) in the ATRA-ATO versus 128/132 (97%) in the ATRA-CHT arm (P=0.12). Four patients died during induction in the ATRA-CHT arm. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range 1-75 months), the 2-year EFS was 98% and 84.9% in the ATRA-ATO and ATRA-CHT groups respectively (P= 0.0002), The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rate was 1.1% and 9.4%, respectively (P=0.005) and, finally, the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 99.1% vs. 94.4% (P=0.01) for ATRA-ATO vs ATRA-CHT, respectively. Conclusions: The data on this extended cohort demonstrate a significantly augmented survival benefit coupled to a higher antileukemic efficacy provided by ATRA-ATO as compared to ATRA-CHT, in low/intermediate risk APL. These results further support ATRA-ATO as the new standard of care in this clinical setting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Platzbecker: Teva: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Presentation includes off-label use of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in front-line management of APL. ATO is currently approved in treatment of relapsed APL in the US and Europe. Breccia:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Fiedler:TEVA: Travel reimbursement for meeting attendance Other. Lübbert:Cephalon / TEVA: Travel support Other. Link:TEVA: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Radsak:Celgene: Research Funding. Döhner:TEVA: Research Funding. Schlenk:TEVA: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lo-Coco:TEVA: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria.

Purpose A randomized clinical trial compared efficacy and toxicity of standard all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) plus chemotherapy versus ATRA plus arsenic trioxide in patients with newly diagnosed, low- or intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Here, we report health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) results. Patients and Methods HRQOL was a secondary end point of this trial. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 was used to assess HRQOL at end of induction and after consolidation therapy. All analyses were based on 156 patients who received at least one dose of treatment, with groups defined according to randomly assigned treatment. Primary analysis was performed, estimating mean HRQOL score over time and differences between treatment arms using a linear mixed model. Results Overall, 162 patients age 18 to 70 years were enrolled. Of these, 150 and 142 patients were evaluable for HRQOL after induction therapy and third consolidation course, respectively. Overall compliance with HRQOL forms was 80.1%. The largest difference, favoring patients treated with ATRA plus arsenic trioxide, was found for fatigue severity (mean score difference, −9.3; 95% CI, −17.8 to −0.7; P = .034) at end of induction therapy. This difference was also clinically relevant. HRQOL differences between treatment arms at end of consolidation showed that for several scales, differences between treatment arms were marginal. Conclusion Overall, current HRQOL findings further support the use of ATRA plus arsenic trioxide as preferred first-line treatment in patients with low- or intermediate-risk APL.

A total of 622 consecutive patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) treated within the Gruppo Italiano per le Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) group during 1989-97 have been reviewed to assess the clinical effectiveness of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) on the incidence of early haemorrhagic deaths and on APL-associated coagulopathy. Of them, 499 were treated with idarubicin plus ATRA (study A) and 123 with Idarubicin alone (study B). In both studies, similar guidelines for supportive treatment were used. Haemorrhagic symptoms were evaluated according to a reproducible score system. Deaths occurring within 10 d of starting treatment were 19 (3.8%) in study A and nine (7.3%) in study B (P = 0.09), with 15 (3%) and five (4.1%) (P not significant) due to haemorrhage. Overall, induction mortality was 7.6% and 16.2% respectively (P 30 x 109/l (P < 0.001) in both studies, and by a haemorrhagic score of 3 in study A (P < 0.001). Although the reduction of early fatal haemorrhages was not significant, a substantial clinical improvement was evident in terms of reduction of the severity of bleeding symptoms, blood product consumption and overall induction mortality when ATRA was combined with idarubicin.

ABVD chemotherapy (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) is considered the standard treatment for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. However, pulmonary and cardiac toxicity rates due to bleomyci...

Acute myeloid disorders with rearrangements of 12p outside the ETV6 gene were characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with a panel of DNA probes. Seven patients with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), one with secondary acute myeloid leukaemia (sAML), and one in the blast phase of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML-BP) were enrolled in the study. All AML cases showed multiple karyotypic changes. Chromosome 5 and/or 7 deletions were the most frequent accompanying changes. FISH revealed amplification, cryptic translocation, and fragmentation of chromosome 12, not discernible at karyotypic level. Different karyotypic rearrangements of 12p showed a common molecular event. Among the seven cases in which breakpoints could be determined, six were telomeric and one centromeric to ETV6. In three AML cases a new recurrent breakpoint in the telomeric region was identified distally to locus D12S158 and to pac 922B22 which is the most telomeric probe available for 12p. Accompanying cryptic deletions were also detected in five patients and the commonly deleted region, of around 700 kb, included the ETV6 gene and the D12S391 locus.