Search

Introduction: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has always been part of breast cancer (BC) treatment. However, during the past 25 years, the surgical management of the axilla has shifted towards a more conservative approach. Until now, ALND has remained the standard surgical technique when the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is macrometastatic. However, ALND may now be considered overtreatment for early-stage BC. The SINODAR-ONE trial is a prospective non-inferiority multicenter randomized study aimed at assessing the role of ALND in patients undergoing either breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy for T1-2 BC presenting 1-2 macrometastatic SLNs. Objectives: The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only was associated with clinically relevant worsening of the prognosis compared with ALND in terms of overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was to evaluate whether there was increased regional (lymph node recurrence) or distant recurrence in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with macrometastatic SLN who did not undergo ALND. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either removal of ≥10 axillary level I/II non-SLNs followed by adjuvant therapy (standard arm) or no further axillary treatment (experimental arm). Results: The trial started in April 2015 and ceased in April 2020, involving 889 patients. The majority of the patients (75.2%) underwent BCS; 328 of 439 patients (74.7%) in the standard treatment arm, and 333 of 440 patients (75.7%) in the experimental treatment arm. 218 patients (24.8%) underwent mastectomy. SLN status at randomization was comparable between the two groups of treatment, with a median number of two SLNs removed and a median number of one positive SLN in both arms. The median number of non-SLNs identified at definitive histopathological evaluation was 16 (interquartile range [IQR] 12–21) in the ALND group. Overall, 193 of 439 patients (44.0%) in the standard treatment arm had additional macrometastases in the removed axillary lymph nodes. However, the median number of positive non SLNs was 0 (IQR 0–1) in the ALND group. Median follow-up was 34.0 months. There were eight deaths (ALND, 4; SNLB only, 4), with a 5-year cumulative mortality of 5.8% and 2.1% in the standard and experimental arm, respectively (p = 0.984). There were 26 recurrences (ALND 11; SNLB only, 15), with a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence of 6.9% and 3.3% in the standard and experimental arm, respectively (p = 0.444). Only one axillary lymph node recurrence was observed in each arm. The 5-year OS rates were 98.9% and 98.8%, in the ALND and SNLB only arm, respectively (p = 0.936). Conclusion: The 3-year survival and relapse rates of T1-2 BC patients with 1-2 macrometastatic SLNs treated with SLNB only, and adjuvant therapy, were not inferior to those of patients treated with ALND. These results do not support the use of routine ALND in patients undergoing BCS. However, given the low number of patients treated with mastectomy, there is no certainty that ALND omission can be extended also to this sub-group. In order to collect further evidence regarding the safety of the experimental treatment in patients candidates for mastectomy, the reopening of the enrollment of these patients as part of a single-arm experimental study started in June 2022. Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Andrea Sagona, Erika Barbieri, Alberto Testori, Valentina Errico, Alberto Bottini, Simone Di Maria Grimaldi, Giulia Caraceni, Luca Boni, Paolo Bruzzi, Bethania Fernandes, Davide Franceschini, Ruggero Spoto, Rosalba Torrisi, Marta Scorsetti, Armando Santoro, Giuseppe Canavese, Corrado Tinterri. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: The current status and future perspectives of the multicenter randomized clinical trial SINODAR-ONE [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-06-01.

Introduction: Patients with triple-negative (TN) or HER2-enriched ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR) seem to be excluded from a second breast-conserving surgery (BCS) under the assumption that salvage mastectomy would provide better oncological outcomes. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the clinical features of these patients, to compare the two surgical alternatives (salvage mastectomy versus second BCS) in terms of oncological results, and to identify independent factors influencing prognosis and surgical treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all the consecutive patients with histologically confirmed TN or HER2-enriched IBCR. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: Eighty-five patients were affected by TN or HER2-enriched IBCR, with a median age of 60 years (range, 32-87 years). The majority of patients (72.9%) were treated with salvage mastectomy. There was no significant difference in terms of DFS between patients receiving a second BCS or mastectomy (p=0.596). However, patients undergoing a second BCS had significantly better DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to mastectomy (p=0.009; p=0.002; p=0.001, respectively). Tumor dimension < 16 mm (78.3% versus 38.7%, hazard ratio (HR)=3.602, 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=1.534-8.459, p=0.003) was found to significantly increase the probability of receiving a second BCS and positively affects recurrence and survival outcomes (DFS: HR=8.065, 95% CI=2.320-28.034, p=0.001; DDFS: HR=17.011, 95% CI=3.853-75.099, p=0.001; OS: HR: 13.881, 95% CI=2.730-70.579, p=0.002; BCSS: HR=36.773, 95% CI=4.579-295.322, p=0.001). Second BCS represents an independent protective factor for OS and BCSS (OS: HR=0.246, 95% CI=0.027-0.697, p=0.002; BCSS: HR=0.313, 95% CI=0.092-0.511, p=0.002). Conclusion: Salvage mastectomy is not always necessary and it does not seem to increase survival compared to a second BCS. This reinforces the concept that the prognosis of TN and HER2-enriched BC recurrence is mainly driven by the biology of the disease, rather than by the extent of surgery. In patients with small (< 16 mm) aggressive subtypes of IBCR, a second conservative approach can still be evaluated and offered, presenting acceptable loco-regional control and survival. Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Andrea Sagona, Erika Barbieri, Simone Di Maria Grimaldi, Ruggero Spoto, Davide Franceschini, Stefano Vaccari, Valeriano Vinci, Ersilia Biondi, Lorenzo Scardina, Corrado Tinterri. Salvage mastectomy is not always necessary for aggressive subtypes of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: A single-institution retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-09.

The optimal surgical management of BRCA-mutation carriers remains a subject of debate. To evaluate the appropriateness of breast cancer (BC) treatment, the oncological outcomes of BRCA-mutation carriers treated either with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy were compared. Additionally, the role of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and potential independent predictive factors for BC treatment were analyzed.We retrospectively reviewed all the consecutive patients with a pathogenic germline mutation in the BRCA1/2 genes tested at our Institution between July 2008 and October 2018. Primary end-points were disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS).The characteristics and outcomes of 124 BRCA-associated BC patients were analyzed. Overall, 69 (55.7%) and 55 (44.3%) patients underwent BCT and mastectomy, respectively; 72 (58.1%) patients underwent BSO. After a median interval of 13.3 months, 24 patients underwent mastectomy after primary BCT. There was no significant difference in terms of DFS, DDFS, and OS between patients treated with BCT or mastectomy (p = 0.39,p = 0.27,p = 0.265, respectively). Patients treated with BSO had significantly better DDFS and OS compared to ovarian conservation (p = 0.033,p = 0.040, respectively). Three independent predictive factors for BCT were identified: age ≤41 years, genetic testing performed post-operatively, and breast tumors ≤21 mm.Our data suggest that BRCA-mutation carriers treated with BCT present similar oncological outcomes compared to mastectomy. Ovarian preservation decreases survival. Young BRCA-mutated patients with small BCs may not need up-front mastectomy, and BSO might be performed when ovarian cancer risk epidemiologically rises and potential reproductive desire is fulfilled.

BackgroundBRCA-mutation carriers have a lifetime risk of breast cancer (BC) that ranges from 36 to 70%. For patients (pts) without mutation, breast conserving surgery (BCS) (followed by radiation therapy) is the treatment of choice since it offers similar survival to that of unilateral mastectomy. However, the optimal local management in BRCA-mutation carriers remains a matter of debate and the role of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in reducing BC risk might be influenced by age and medical BC treatments (such as GnRH analogues). Patients and methodsWe retrieved clinical pathologic characteristics of 124 BRCA-mutated BC pts, consecutively tested at our Institution from 2008 to 2018. Primary end-point was recurrence-free survival (RFS) evaluation in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary end-point was identification of independent predictive factors for BCS. Clinical pathologic characteristics were evaluated and compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Mayer curves were used to describe DFS, DDFS and OS. ResultsMedian age at BC surgery was 41 years (range 24-74), most of the pts (79%) were pre-menopausal and presented with ductal invasive carcinoma (91.9%). As per biological subtype, 63 (50.8%) pts had luminal-like BC, 52 (41.9%) triple negative (TN) BC and 9 (7.3%) HER2 enriched-like BC. More than half pts (62.9%) presented with G3 tumors and median Ki-67 was 40% (range 5-95). 17 (13.7%) and 80 (64.5%) pts underwent neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively; 64 (51.6%) pts received adjuvant endocrine therapy, 39 (31.5%) with the addition of GnRH analogue. When comparing BCS to mastectomy, regardless of BSO, we could not observe any statistically significant difference in all the RFS end-points. 10-year DFS rate was 56.4% and 79.5%, respectively (p=0.187); 10-year DDFS rate was 83.7% and 82.3%, respectively (p=0.689); 10-year OS rate was 87.7% and 85.1%, respectively (p=0.947). At a multivariate analysis, age ≤41 years (p=0.008; OR 0.309; 95% CI 0.190-0.513) and primary tumor dimension ≤21 mm (p=0.008; OR 0.320; 95% CI 0.114-0.426), were the only predictors of breast surgery type (BCS compared to any other surgical treatment). ConclusionsOur data suggest that young pre-menopausal BRCA-mutated pts with small tumors may not need up-front mastectomy and BSO might be postponed, when ovarian cancer risk epidemiologically rises and potential reproductive desire is fulfilled. Citation Format: Agnese Losurdo, Damiano Gentile, Monica Zuradelli, Andrea Sagona, Erika Barbieri, Monica Barile, Paolo Bianchi, Rosalba Torrisi, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Marta Scorsetti, Corrado Tinterri, Armando Santoro. Breast conserving surgery in BRCA-mutation carriers. A single Institution experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-18-16.

Salvage mastectomy is regarded as the treatment of first choice for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR), even if a second breast conserving surgery (BCS) is feasible. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of IBCR patients who had undergone either mastectomy or second BCS, performing a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to reduce the selection bias. All the consecutive patients with IBCR were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two different groups of treatment: repeat BCS versus salvage mastectomy. The propensity score predicting the probability of surgical treatment was determined for each patient and a 1:1 matching was performed. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. A total of 309 patients underwent surgical treatment for IBCR. After PSM, 108 patients treated with repeat BCS and 108 patients treated with salvage mastectomy were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in terms of DFS between patients with IBCR receiving repeat BCS or salvage mastectomy (p = 0.167). However, patients with IBCR undergoing second BCS had significantly better DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to salvage mastectomy (p

Background A small proportion of patients with primary breast cancer who receive breast conserving surgery (BCS) will develop an ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR). In these patients, mastectomy is still considered the treatment of first choice, even if a second conservative surgical approach is technically feasible. The aims of our study are to analyze the characteristics of patients with IBCR after BCS, evaluate and compare the different treatment modalities (repeat BCS vs. mastectomy) in terms of patients and tumor characteristics, disease-free interval (DFI), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).MethodsOur prospectively maintained institutional database was queried, and 309 patients with IBCR after BCS who underwent either repeat BCS or mastectomy, between January 2008 and December 2018, were identified. Ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence was defined as a local tumor reappearance in the same breast or in the surgical scar. Exclusion criteria were: age Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Andrea Sagona, Chiara Annunziata Pasqualina Anghelone, Erika Barbieri, Emilia Marrazzo, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Giuseppe Canavese, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Corrado Tinterri. Ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: Treatment and long-term oncological results at a high volume center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-16.

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome occurs when metastases from an unknown primary site spread to multiple organs. Occult breast cancer (OBC) is defined as a clinically recognizable metastatic carcinoma from an undetectable primary breast tumor. It accounts for 0.3–1% of all breast cancers, often presenting with lymph node, bone, and skin metastases. Clinical and radiological examinations represent the first steps in the diagnostic algorithm for CUP syndrome from OBC. However, histological and immunohistochemical analyses, multidisciplinary team evaluation, and a multidisciplinary therapy are essential in the diagnosis and treatment of CUP syndrome from OBC. We report the case of a 52-year-old woman who underwent the removal of a parietal skin lesion. The histological and immunohistochemical analyses suggested a breast cancer origin. Clinical assessment and laboratory and radiological examinations did not locate the primary tumor. Hormone therapy was offered to the patient; however, she refused it. After 28 months, the patient reported a right cervical lump, and a total-body positron emission tomography showed dissemination of the disease to the lymph nodes and bone. A CUP syndrome from OBC was diagnosed. A multimodality approach with radiotherapy and hormone and biological therapy was started. At present, 5 years from the first presentation, the patient is asymptomatic despite the disseminated disease.

Introduction: Neuroendocrine neoplasm of the breast (bNENs) are considered a rare disease, even if in WHO data they represent about 2-5 % of all breast cancer. The last WHO classification includes: welldifferentiated neuroendocrine tumor (bNET), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and invasive carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. The current knowledge on clinical management of bNENs is poor and patients are usually treated according to non-endocrine tumor components guidelines. Materials and Methods: We presented our experience of six cases of bNENs. Moreover, we conducted a systematic review of published data on diagnosis, treatment and outcome of this kind of tumors. Results: bNENS usually presented as palpable breast masses, classically appearing as irregular hypoechoic lesions at US examination and as hyperdense masses at mammography. Usually pre-operative tumor biopsy is not able to recognize the neuroendocrine components and the final diagnosis is performed only on definitive histopathological assessment. The most frequent subtype seems to be neuroendocrine carcinoma and synaptophysin is positive in most specimens. Treatment strategies, including surgical treatment, radiotherapy and medical treatment are nowadays based on current non-endocrine breast cancer guidelines, independently from neuroendocrine components, even if some studies have proposed the use of somatostatin analogues for bNET and cisplatin-etoposide for NEC. Prognosis of all bNENs, especially of poorly differentiated neoplasia, seems worse compared to non-neuroendocrine breast cancer and stage and morphology seem the best predictor of tumor outcome. Conclusions: We provide an algorithm for clinical management of bNETs, basing on available data. More studies are necessary for confirming the best treatment strategy for these patients, in order to improve clinical outcome

Mucinous carcinoma (MC) is a rare breast cancer characterized by the presence of large extracellular mucin amount. Two main subtypes can be distinguished: pure (PMC) and mixed (MMC). We conducted a retrospective MC analysis in our prospective maintained database, calculating disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). We found a global 92.1% OS (higher in MMC group and statistically significative) and a DFS of 95.3% (higher in MMC group but not statistically significative)., Highlights • Mucinous carcinoma (MC) is a rare breast cancer characterized by the presence of large extracellular mucin amount. • We conducted a literature review and conducted a retrospective analysis in our database, finding 157 cases of MC. • Our findings are consistent with those published in literature, showing fundamental differences between PMC and MMC management and outcomes., We reviewed literature and our data to find out mucinous breast cancer's overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and if there are differences between pure mucinous breast cancer and mixed mucinous breast cancer in terms of OS and DFS.

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as the standard procedure to replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). SLNB is accepted in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients; however, its role in clinically node-positive (cN+) patients is debatable. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of BC patients undergoing NAC and SLNB. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical significance of SLNB in the setting of NAC. This was accomplished by comparing the characteristics and oncological outcomes between cN0 and cN+ patients prior to NAC and type of axillary surgery. Results: A total of 291 patients were included in the analysis: 131 were cN0 and 160 were cN+ who became ycN0 after NAC. At a median follow-up of 43 months, axillary recurrence occurred in three cN0 (2.3%) and two cN+ (1.3%) patients. However, there were no statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes (disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, overall survival, and breast-cancer-specific survival) between cN0 and cN+ patients nor between patients treated with SLNB only or ALND. Conclusions: SLNB in the setting of NAC is an acceptable procedure with a general good prognosis and low axillary failure rates for both cN0 and cN+ patients.

Introduction: Treatment of early-stage beast cancer (BC) has changed since recent evidence showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can reduce residual tumor cellularity (RTC) and improve patient outcomes. Achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) has been associated with significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). However, among patients treated with NAC, few experience pCR, while approximately 60-80% of them achieve a pathologic partial response (pPR). In previous studies, BC patients with different grades of pPR have been usually grouped and analyzed together, with inconsistent results and unclear prognostic significance. Objectives: The primary aims of this study were to describe the clinical and treatment characteristics of BC patients treated with NAC, to identify independent predictive factors of pCR, and to compare the oncologic outcomes between patients achieving pCR or pPR. The secondary aim of this study was to measure the RTC of BC patients with pPR and to compare the outcomes of patients with different RTC in order to improve prognostic information. Methods: All the consecutive BC patients undergoing NAC at the Breast Unit of IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (Milan, Italy) between October 2006 and April 2020 and their corresponding post-operative pathology slides were reviewed. The following exclusion criteria were used: excisional biopsy or debulking surgery as first BC operation, patients with a previous BC diagnosis or other prior or synchronous malignancies, male patients, unknown NAC regimen, disease progression during NAC, and follow-up ≤12 months. Results: A total of 495 BC patients received NAC. Overall, 148 (29.9%) patients achieved pCR, while 347 (70.1%) had pPR, and median RTC was 40%. At multivariable analysis, 3 independent factors predicting pCR were identified. Tumor stage pre-NAC (cT1-2 84.5% versus cT3-4 15.5%, odds ratio (OR)=0.119, 95% confidence interval (95%CI)=0.048-0.189, p=0.001), BC sub-type (HER2-enriched 54.7% versus triple-negative 29.8% versus luminal-like 15.5%, OR=2.178, 95%CI=2.055-2.301, p=0.001), and vascular invasion (absence 98.0% versus presence 2.0%, OR=0.022, 95%CI=0.004-0.090, p=0.001). Patients with BC undergoing NAC and achieving pCR presented statistically significant longer DFS, DDFS, and OS (p = < 0.001). Patients with RTC < 40% presented statistically significant better DFS and DDFS (p = 0.033, p = 0.015, respectively). However, no statistically significant difference in terms of OS was observed between RTC < 40% and RTC ≥40% groups (p = 0.148). Conclusions: Tumor stage pre-NAC, BC sub-type, and vascular invasion are significantly and independently associated with pCR. Patients with pCR present a better prognosis compared to patients with pPR in terms of DFS, DDFS, and OS. Measurement of RTC in BC patients with pPR improves the prognostic information that can be obtained from the assessment of the pathologic response. Different patterns of residual disease play an important role in predicting the risk of subsequent loco-regional and distant recurrence, and patients with RTC < 40% present significantly better DFS and DDFS. Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Andrea Sagona, Camilla De Carlo, Bethania Fernandes, Simone Di Maria Grimaldi, Erika Barbieri, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Lorenzo Scardina, Ersilia Biondi, Flavia Jacobs, Giulia Vatteroni, Corrado Tinterri. Evaluation of pathologic response and residual tumor cellularity following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy predict prognosis in breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-01-32.

Background: Loco-regional therapy (LRT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been investigated in several clinical trials, with heterogeneous and conflicting results. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of de novo MBC patients treated with front-line chemotherapy (FLC) followed by LRT of the primary tumor. Our aims were to evaluate the characteristics, treatment, and oncological outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), and overall survival (OS) of de novo MBC. We also investigated possible subgroups of patients with better outcomes according to menopausal status, biological sub-type, location, number of metastases, and radiologic complete response after FLC. Results: We included 61 patients in the study. After a median follow-up of 55 months, disease progression occurred in 60.7% of patients and 49.2% died. There were no significant differences in PFS, DPFS, and OS between different subgroups of de novo MBC patients. A trend toward better PFS and DPFS was observed in triple-positive tumors, without a statistically significant difference in OS. Conclusions: No specific subgroup of de novo MBC patients showed a statistically significant survival advantage after FLC followed by LRT of the primary tumor.

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients. The SLN is the only site of axillary metastasis (MTS) in ≥60% of cases. Recently, a randomized controlled trial (Z0011) comparing SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone with SLNB followed by ALND in patients with 1-2 SLNs+ demonstrated no significant statistical difference in relapse and overall survival (OS) rates among the two different groups. However, this study had some limitations: small tumor size (≤2cm in 70% of cases), frequent presence of only microMTS in SLN (40%), prevalent use of “whole breast” adjuvant radiotherapy (>90%). Given these considerations, the SINODAR-ONE study started in April 2015. Objectives: The aims are to assess whether ALND omission in BC patients with 1-2 SLNs+ is associated with worse survival and/or increased rate of regional/distant relapse. Thus evaluating whether SLNB is or is not inferior to ALND. Primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) referring to distant MTS and loco-regional recurrence. Methods: Patients received either mastectomy or conservative surgery plus radiotherapy. They all underwent SLNB and were randomly divided into two arms of treatment: standard (SLNB plus ALND) or experimental treatment (only SLNB). According to multidisciplinary evaluation, patients could undergo additional adjuvant radiotherapy, chemo- and/or hormonal therapy, or no further therapy. Eligibility criteria: age 40-75 years; primary invasive T1-T2 tumor; axillary nodes cN0; no more than 2 macro-metastatic SLNs; no distant MTS; no neo-adjuvant therapy; no previous invasive BC. Exclusion criteria: in situ, inflammatory, contralateral BC; micro-metastatic SLNs; pregnancy or breast feeding; comorbidity impeding adjuvant therapy. All analyses were performed both on all patients according to the Intention-To-Treat principle and excluding those patients who did not receive the axillary treatment randomly assigned. Statistical analysis: OS and DFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Product Limit Estimator and differences between arms were assessed with the log-rank test. Results: The enrollment of patients ended in April 2020 with a total of 889 cases (443: standard arm; 446: experimental arm). In April 2021, we conducted a preliminary analysis on 889 patients. We found the two groups homogeneous for epidemiologic characteristics (age and menopausal status), tumor characteristics (tumor size, pTNM, immunohistochemistry, histology, grading, vascular and lymphatic invasion), and adjuvant therapies. The majority of patients (77.2%) received breast conserving surgery, while 22.8% of patients underwent mastectomy. A median of 2 SLNs were removed in both arms. Overall, only 3 micro-metastatic SNLs were found (1 in the standard arm and 2 in the experimental arm). Conclusion: In sum, OS rate is 99.1% and 99.3% in the standard and experimental arm, respectively; DFS rate is 96.8% and 95.9% in the standard and experimental arm, respectively. After a median follow-up of 36 months, there has been only one axillary recurrence in the experimental arm. Additionally, we found seven distant relapses in both arms; four and three deaths in the standard and experimental arm, respectively. Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Erika Barbieri, Andrea Sagona, Alberto Bottini, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Marta Scorsetti, Giuseppe Canavese, Corrado Tinterri. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes compared to complete dissection in T1-T2 breast cancer patients presenting 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes. A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Sinodar One [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-05.

OBJECTIVE: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (BC). In luminal-like BC, the decision to administer NAC remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, and oncological outcomes of luminal-like, node positive, BC patients treated with NAC, and to identify independent predictive factors for treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with luminal-like, node positive BC who underwent NAC were retrospectively reviewed. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no invasive or in situ residual tumor in both breast and axillary nodes (ypT0N0). RESULTS: A total of 205 luminal-like, node positive BC patients underwent NAC. Overall, 34 (16.6%) patients showed pCR, 86 (42.0%) patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 119 (58.0%) patients underwent mastectomy, 130 (63.4%) patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without prior sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and 75 (36.6%) patients underwent breast surgery plus SLNB. Pathologic CR to NAC (29.1% vs 7.6% if no pCR, odds ratio = 2.866, 95% confidence interval = 1.296-6.341, p = 0.009) was found to significantly increase the probability to receive BCS. There was no significant difference in terms of disease-free and overall survival between patients with luminal-like, node positive BC receiving BCS or mastectomy (p = 0.596, p = 0.134, respectively), and ALND or SLNB only (p = 0.661, p = 0.856, respectively). CONCLUSION: Luminal-like, node positive BC presents low pCR rates after NAC. Pre-operative chemotherapy increases the rate of BCS. Pathologic CR has emerged as an independent predictive factor for BCS. In patients with axillary pCR, SLNB is an acceptable procedure not associated with worse oncological outcomes.

Background Whether the extent of residual disease in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) influences the prognosis in clinically node-positive breast cancer (BC) patients remains to be ascertained. Methods One hundred and thirty-four consecutive cN+/BC-patients received NAC followed by SLN biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection. Cumulative incidence of overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival, BC-related recurrences and death from BC were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method both in the whole patient population and according to the SLN status. The log rank test was used for comparisons between groups. Results The SLN was identified in 123/134 (91.8%) patients and was positive in 98/123 (79.7%) patients. Sixty-five of them (66.3%) had other axillary nodes involved. SLN sensitivity and false-negative rate were 88.0% and 2.0%, Median follow-up was 10.2 years. Ten-year cumulative incidence of axillary, breast and distant recurrences, and death from BC were 6.5%, 11.9%, 33.4% and 31.3%, respectively. Ten-year OS and DFS were 67.3% and 55.9%. When stratified by SLN status, 10-year cumulative incidence of BC-related and loco-regional events, and death from BC were similar between disease-free SLN and micrometastatic SLN subgroups (28.9% vs 30.2%, p = 0.954; 21.6% vs 13.4%, p = 0.840; 12.9 vs 24.5%, p=0.494). Likewise, 10-year OS and DFS were comparable (80.0% vs 75.5%, p=0.975 and 68.0% vs 69.8, p=0.836). Both OS and DFS were lower in patients presenting a macrometastatic SLN (60.2% and 47.5%). Conclusion Outcome of patients with micrometastatic SLN was similar to that of patients with disease-free SLN, which was more favorable as compared to that of patients with macrometastatic SLN.

Salvage mastectomy is regarded as the treatment of first choice for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR), even if a second breast conserving surgery (BCS) is feasible. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of IBCR patients who had undergone either mastectomy or second BCS, performing a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to reduce the selection bias. All the consecutive patients with IBCR were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two different groups of treatment: repeat BCS versus salvage mastectomy. The propensity score predicting the probability of surgical treatment was determined for each patient and a 1:1 matching was performed. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. A total of 309 patients underwent surgical treatment for IBCR. After PSM, 108 patients treated with repeat BCS and 108 patients treated with salvage mastectomy were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in terms of DFS between patients with IBCR receiving repeat BCS or salvage mastectomy (p = 0.167). However, patients with IBCR undergoing second BCS had significantly better DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to salvage mastectomy (p

Salvage mastectomy is considered the treatment of choice for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR), even if a second breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is feasible. The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of IBCR patients, to compare the 2 therapeutic options in terms of long-term outcomes, and to identify independent factors that may predict the type of treatment.A total of 309 IBCR patients who underwent either repeat BCS or mastectomy were identified. All the analyzed patients with IBCR had true recurrence.Repeat BCS and salvage mastectomy were performed in 143 and 166 patients, respectively. Age 65 years (59.6% vs 37.1% if age ≥ 65 years; odds ratio, 2.374; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-5.24; P = .018) and disease-free interval 24 months (15.7% vs 10.5% if disease-free interval ≥ 24 months; odds ratio, 2.705; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-5.97; P = .007) were found to significantly increase the probability of receipt of mastectomy. Disease-free survival rates at 3, 5, and 10 years were 79.2%, 68.2%, and 36.9%; and 77.2%, 65.9%, and 55.3% in patients receiving repeat BCS or mastectomy, respectively (P = .842). Overall survival rates at 3, 5, and 10 years were 95.4%, 91.4%, and 68.5%; and 87.3%, 69.3%, and 57.9%, respectively, in patients receiving repeat BCS or mastectomy (P = .018).Salvage mastectomy should not be considered the only treatment option for IBCR. A second BCS can still be evaluated and proposed to IBCR patients, with acceptable locoregional control and survival. The risk of poor long-term prognosis after mastectomy should be shared with the patient.

Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) requires the entire breast tissue to be removed, maintaining the nipple-areola complex, and represents nowadays the gold standard of the demolitive breast surgery. Although it represents the evolution of conservative breast surgery, NSM presents some limitations in the selection of women candidates for treatment, and still there are no real guidelines regarding its indications, but simply objective data to address the choice. How the breast surgery approach to demolitive and conservative surgery has changed over time? We evaluated throughout the years (from 2009 up to 2018) the time trend of NSM at our institution and analysed the main differences between patients undergone NSM and other mastectomies and/or breast conserving surgery in terms of cancer size, multicentricity and biological profile. We found 781 NSMs, 1261 other mastectomies and 5621 breast conservative surgeries. Among NSMs, 39.6% were reconstructed with tissue expander and 58.1% with definitive prosthesis. From 2009 to 2018 we found a general increase of NSM rate (from 21.3% of all mastectomies in 2009 to 67.3% in 2018) and a decrease of total mastectomies (from 78.7% of all mastectomies in 2009 to 32.7% in 2018). In line with the literature data, our data confirm that in the recent years NSM represents the gold standard for radical breast surgery. Undisputed in prophylaxis, NSM is continuously acquiring more support in being used as first line treatment for locally advanced disease.

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients. The SLN is the only site of axillary metastasis (MTS) in ≤60% of cases. Recently, a randomized controlled trial (Z0011) comparing SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone with SLNB followed by ALND in patients with 1-2 SLNs+ demonstrated no significant statistical difference in relapse and overall survival rates among the two different groups. However, this study had some limitations: small tumor size (≤2cm in 70% of cases), frequent presence of only microMTS in SLN (40%), prevalent use of “whole breast” adjuvant radiotherapy (>90%). Given these considerations, the SINODAR-ONE study started in April 2015.Objectives: The aims are to assess whether ALND omission in BC patients with 1-2 SLNs+ is associated with worse survival and/or increased rate of regional/distant relapse. Thus evaluating whether SLNB is or is not inferior to ALND. Primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) referring to distant MTS and loco-regional recurrence. Methods: Patients receive either mastectomy or conservative surgery plus radiotherapy. They all undergo SLNB and are randomly divided into two arms of treatment: standard (SLNB plus ALND) or experimental treatment (only SLNB). According to multidisciplinary evaluation, patients may undergo additional adjuvant radiotherapy, chemo- and/or hormonal therapy , or no further therapy. Eligibility criteria: age 40-75 years; primary invasive T1-T2 tumor; axillary nodes clinically N0; no more than 2 macro-metastatic SLNs; no distant MTS; no neo-adjuvant therapy; no previous invasive BC; signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria: in situ, inflammatory, contralateral BC; micro-metastic SLNs; pregnancy or breast feeding; comorbidity impeding adjuvant therapy. All analyses are performed both on all patients according to the Intention-To-Treat principle and excluding those patients who did not receive the axillary treatment randomly assigned. Statistical analysis: OS and DFS are calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Product Limit Estimator and differences between arms are assessed with the log-rank test. Results: The enrollment of patients ended in April 2020 with a total of 889 cases (443: standard arm; 446: experimental arm). In June 2020, we conducted an ad interim analysis on 889 patients. We found the two groups homogeneous for epidemiologic characteristics (age and menopausal status), tumor characteristics (tumor size, pTNM, immunohistochemistry, histology, grading, vascular and lymphatic invasion), adjuvant therapies and surgery on T. In particular we have performed a 23,1% of mastectomies in the standard arm and 20,1% in the experimental arm. We found a median of 2 sentinel lymph nodes removed in both arms and 1 non-sentinel positive lymph node in the experimental arm, and only 3 micro-metastases (1 in the standard arm and 2 in the experimental arm). Conclusion: In sum, with a median follow-up of 30 months, there have been no axillary recurrence in both arms. In the standard arm we found 8 total events (2 deaths and 6 distant relapses) and in in the experimental arm 6 events (1 death and 5 distant relapses), with a projected 5-years cumulative incidence of 6,5% in standard arm and 4,85% in the experimental arm. Citation Format: Corrado Tinterri, Emilia Marrazzo, Chiara Anghelone, Erika Barbieri, Andrea Sagona, Alberto Bottini, Arianna Rubino, Damiano Gentile, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Giuseppe Canavese. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes compared to complete dissection in T1-T2 breast cancer patients presenting 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes : A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Sinodar One. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-01.

Introduction Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients with negative SLNs without jeopardizing survival or regional control. International guidelines keep recommending ALND in the presence of positive (+) SLNs. However SLN is the only site of axillary metastasis (MTS) in many cases (60%). Retrospective studies have also shown a low risk of locoregional relapse in patients with SLNs+ not receiving ALND.This latter finding was recently confirmed in a randomized trial comparing SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone with SLNB followed by ALND in patients with 1-2 SLNs+. However the observation of both similar relapse rate and survival in the 2 arms and the conclusion of a non-inferiority of SLNB compared to ALND require cautiousness because of some study limitations: premature enrollment cessation due to death rate lower than expected, short follow-up (6 years), small tumor size (≤2cm in 70% of cases), frequent presence of only microMTS in SLN (40%), prevalent use of “whole breast” adjuvant radiotherapy (>90%) which irradiates the breast but also the I° axillary level, thereby contributing to the low rate of regional relapse in the SLNB arm due to lymph node sterilization. Consequently further randomized trials with more precise selection criteria based on homogeneous clinico-pathological features and with longer follow-up are needed to confirm that performing only SLNB does not affect survival or relapse risk in patients with 1-2 SLNs+. Materials and Methods Primary and secondary aims of the present 2-arm randomized trial are to assess whether ALND omission in BC patients with 1-2 SLNs+ is associated with worse survival and/or increased rate of regional/distant relapse, respectively, thus evaluating whether SLNB is or is not inferior to ALND. Patients receive either conservative surgery or mastectomy and radiotherapy. They all undergo intraoperative SLNB and SLN evaluation, and are randomly assigned to either further dissection of level I-II axillary lymph nodes (standard ALND arm) or absence of any axillary surgery (experimental SLNB arm). According to International Guidelines post-surgery treatments. Eligibility criteria are: age 40-75 years; primary invasive T1-T2 tumor; axillary nodes clinically N0; no more than 2 SLNs presenting macroMTS at intraoperative or definitive histological evaluation; no distant MTS; no neoadjuvant therapy; no previous invasive BC, signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria are: in situ, inflammatory, contralateral BC; presence of only microMTS in the SLN+; pregnancy or breast feeding; comorbidity impeding adjuvant therapy. Follow-up controls foresee: clinical examination every 6 months for 5 years and yearly thereafter; annual mammography and breast echography; annual axillary echography for patients in the SLNB arm; additional laboratory and instrumental surveys in case of suspected onset of distant MTS. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) referring to distant MTS and to locoregional (ipsilateral breast or axillary, internal mammary or sopraclaveolar lymph nodes) disease recurrence. All analyses are performed both on all patients according to the Intention-To-Treat principle and excluding those patients who did not receive the axillary treatment randomly assigned. Citation Format: Corrado Tinterri, Emilia Marrazzo, Federico Frusone, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Erika Barbieri, Andrea Sagona, Alberto Bottini, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Giuseppe Canavese. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes compared to complete dissection in T1-T2 breast cancer patients presenting 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Sinodar One Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-02.

Purpose We investigated in a single institution series of 124 women with operable breast cancer whether tumor clinicopathological features could predict the 70-gene signature (Mammaprint ® , MP) results, and whether MP results could help to make decisions for the use of chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with ER positive breast cancer beyond recommendations of international guidelines. Results Among the 68 ER/PgR positive, HER2 negative tumors, Ki-67 ≥ 20% was the only significant predictor of a high risk-MP among standard clinicopathological features. In candidates for endocrine therapy with undetermined benefit from CT according to international guidelines, MP results would have led to different treatment decisions in 13/46 (28%) and in 20/68 (29%) pts according to NCCN and St. Gallen recommendations, respectively. Conclusions Ki-67 independently predicted high risk-MP in ER/PgR positive, HER2 negative tumors. MP results would have led to discordant treatment recommendations in about 30% of cases, generally increasing indication rate for CT. The results of large randomized trials are warranted in order to understand whether we should rely on multigene assays rather than on standard clinicopathological features for treatment decisions.

Purpose: Studies have shown that the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint®) (MP) may outperform clinicopathological risk assessment and may predict the benefit from chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with early-stage breast cancer. However, the need of fresh tissue and the high cost of the assay limit its use in daily clinical practice. We investigated whether 1) tumor clinicopathologic features can predict MP risk (high vs. low); 2) MP results could help to make decisions for the use of CT in pts with ER positive (ER+ve) breast cancer beyond recommendations of known international guidelines (NCCN, St. Gallen). Patients and methods: Women with operable invasive breast cancer without evidence of distant disease undergoing surgery at the Breast Surgery Department were enrolled into the study. A 3 mm punch biopsy of the tumor was obtained from the specimen within the first hour after surgery. Samples were shipped to the laboratory in an RNA-stabilizing solution and were studied to ensure the presence of at least 30% of tumor cells and a customized microarray containing 70 genes was analyzed as described by the manufacturer. Results: 124 consecutive pts were enrolled into the study; 106 tumor samples were adequate for the microarray. Median age was 53 yrs (range 28–83), mean tumor size was 2.3 cm (SD ±1.34), 52.4% pts had pN0, 55% of tumors had Ki-67 ≥20% and 36% were poorly differentiated. ER were detected in ≥50% of cells in 82% and As expected, poorly differentiated, ER and PgR negative, HER2 positive and highly proliferating tumors were more likely to be classified as high-MP. We then focused our analysis on ER and PgR +ve, HER2 negative tumors and assessed features correlated with MP results in this subgroup. Unexpectedly, 31/80 (39%) of these tumors were classified as high-MP vs. 49 (61%) low-MP. We found that tumor size (T1 vs. T2-T4), poor differentiation (G3 vs G1-2) and high proliferation (Ki-67 ≥20%) were significantly associated with a high-MP result. In an exploratory multivariate analysis tumor size and Ki-67 remained as independent predictors of high-MP result. At last, when we compared MP risk with recommendations for AT from international guidelines we found that in the subgroup of candidates for endocrine therapy (ET) in whom the benefit from the addition of CT is undetermined, 25/68 pts (37%) were high-MP and 43 pts (63%) low-MP. When we considered recommendations for AT proposed by our multidisciplinary team according to international guidelines, 11/25 pts (44%) with high-MP received ET only and 14 pts (56%) CT + ET, while among 43 pts with low-MP only 9 received both CT and ET. Conclusions: Our study shows that the 70-gene signature was feasible in the clinical setting, as 85% of tumor samples were adequate. A substantial proportion of ER/PgR+ve, HER2 negative tumors was classified as high-MP; within this subgroup, proliferation and tumor size independently predicted high-MP results. In 20 pts, MP risk would have resulted in discordant recommendations for AT compared to those based on standard clinicopathologic features. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-27.

11562Background: Mammography is the standard for breast cancer (BC) screening and diagnosis. However, its limited accuracy and false-positive results necessitate the identification of novel complem...

Parallel to its life-threatening nature, breast cancer can affect physical integrity, having a psychosocial impact on patients. Determining the optimal proportion of patients who should undergo breast reconstruction after cancer surgery represents a complex task. What seems to be unquestionable is that the ability to offer reconstruction and a wide range of surgical options plays an important role in current breast cancer management. The multidisciplinary approach is a paramount aspect not only for a successful oncologic treatment, but also for improving patient quality of life.