Search

Background and aims: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a marker for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, is reduced by bempedoic acid. We assessed the relationship between changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and hsCRP in relation to baseline statin use. Methods: Pooled data from four phase 3 trials (patients on maximally tolerated statins [Pool 1] and patients receiving no or low-dose statins [Pool 2]) were used to determine the proportion of patients with baseline hsCRP ≥2 mg/L who achieved hsCRP

Contains fulltext : 291402.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) is the second most common monogenic lipid disorder (prevalence 1 in 850-3500), characterized by postprandial remnant accumulation and associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Many FD patients do not achieve non-HDL-C treatment goals, indicating the need for additional lipid-lowering treatment options. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the PCSK9 monoclonal antibody evolocumab added to standard lipid-lowering therapy on fasting and post fat load lipids and lipoproteins in patients with FD. METHODS: A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial comparing evolocumab (140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks) with placebo during two 12-week treatment periods. At the start and end of each treatment period patients received an oral fat load. The primary endpoint was the 8-hour post fat load non-HDL-C area under the curve (AUC). Secondary endpoints included fasting and post fat load lipids and lipoproteins. RESULTS: In total, 28 patients completed the study. Mean age was 62±9 years and 93% had an Ɛ2Ɛ2 genotype. Evolocumab reduced the 8-hour post fat load non-HDL-C AUC with 49% (95%CI 42-55) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) AUC with 47% (95%CI 41-53). Other fasting and absolute post fat load lipids and lipoproteins including triglycerides and remnant-cholesterol were also significantly reduced by evolocumab. However, evolocumab did not have significant effects on the rise above fasting levels that occurred after consumption of the oral fat load. CONCLUSIONS: Evolocumab added to standard lipid-lowering therapy significantly reduced fasting and absolute post fat load concentrations of non-HDL-C, apoB and other atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins in FD patients. The clinically significant decrease in lipids and lipoproteins can be expected to translate into a reduction in CVD risk in these high-risk patients.

INTRODUCTION: Carotid plaque intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) is associated with future cardiovascular events. It was hypothesised that plasma proteins associated with carotid plaque IPH are also likely to be associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: In pre-operative blood samples from patients undergoing CEA within the Athero-Express biobank, proteins involved in cardiovascular disease were measured using three OLINK proteomics immunoassays. The association between proteins and IPH was analysed using logistic regression analyses. Subsequently, the association between the IPH associated plasma proteins and the three year post-operative risk of MACE (including stroke, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death) was analysed. RESULTS: Within the three year follow up, 130 patients (18.9%) of 688 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA developed MACE. Six of 276 plasma proteins were found to be significantly associated with IPH, from which only lipoprotein lipase (LPL) was associated with the post-operative risk of MACE undergoing CEA. Within the 30 day peri-operative period, high plasma LPL was independently associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation [SD] 1.60, 1.10 - 2.30), p = .014). From 30 days to three years, however, high LPL was associated with a lower risk of MACE (adjusted HR per SD 0.80, 0.65 - 0.99, p= .036). CONCLUSION: High LPL concentrations were found to be associated with a higher risk of MACE in the first 30 post-operative days but with a lower risk MACE between 30 days and three years, meaning that LPL has different hazards at different time points. ispartof: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY vol:65 issue:5 pages:700-709 ispartof: location:England status: published

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been established as an independent and causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Individuals with elevated levels of Lp(a) (>125 nmol/L; >50 mg/dl) display increased arterial wall inflammation characterized by activation of the endothelium by Lp(a)-carried oxidized phospholipids and recruitment of circulating monocytes. This results in increased secretion of chemoattractants and cytokines, upregulation of adhesion molecules and increased migration of leukocytes through the vessel wall. In addition, Lp(a) is also pivotal in the initiation phase of aortic valve stenosis. The oxidized phospholipids associated, in part, with the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] moiety of Lp(a) stimulate the aortic valve residential cell, the valve interstitial cells (VICs), to either induce osteoblastic differentiation or apoptosis, thereby initiating the process of aortic valve calcification. Lastly, Lp(a) has been linked to systemic inflammation, including the acute phase response. Specifically, the cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6) has a unique relationship with Lp(a), since the LPA gene contains IL-6 response elements. In this review, we will discuss the pathways and cell types affected by Lp(a) in the context of atherosclerosis, aortic valve stenosis and the acute phase response, highlighting the role of Lp(a) as an inflammatory mastermind. ispartof: Atherosclerosis vol:349 pages:101-109 ispartof: location:Ireland status: published

Aims Current risk scores do not accurately identify patients at highest risk of recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in need of more intensive therapeutic interventions. Advances in high-throughput plasma proteomics, analysed with machine learning techniques, may offer new opportunities to further improve risk stratification in these patients. Methods and results Targeted plasma proteomics was performed in two secondary prevention cohorts: the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) cohort (n = 870) and the Athero-Express cohort (n = 700). The primary outcome was recurrent ASCVD (acute myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death). Machine learning techniques with extreme gradient boosting were used to construct a protein model in the derivation cohort (SMART), which was validated in the Athero-Express cohort and compared with a clinical risk model. Pathway analysis was performed to identify specific pathways in high and low C-reactive protein (CRP) patient subsets. The protein model outperformed the clinical model in both the derivation cohort [area under the curve (AUC): 0.810 vs. 0.750; P < 0.001] and validation cohort (AUC: 0.801 vs. 0.765; P < 0.001), provided significant net reclassification improvement (0.173 in validation cohort) and was well calibrated. In contrast to a clear interleukin-6 signal in high CRP patients, neutrophil-signalling-related proteins were associated with recurrent ASCVD in low CRP patients. Conclusion A proteome-based risk model is superior to a clinical risk model in predicting recurrent ASCVD events. Neutrophil-related pathways were found in low CRP patients, implying the presence of a residual inflammatory risk beyond traditional NLRP3 pathways. The observed net reclassification improvement illustrates the potential of proteomics when incorporated in a tailored therapeutic approach in secondary prevention patients.

Background and aims Thrombosis is a major driver of adverse outcome and mortality in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Hypercoagulability may be related to the cytokine storm associated with COVID-19, which is mainly driven by interleukin (IL)-6. Plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels increase following IL-6 upregulation and Lp(a) has anti-fibrinolytic properties. This study investigated whether Lp(a) elevation may contribute to the pro-thrombotic state hallmarking COVID-19 patients. Methods Lp(a), IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured in 219 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and analyzed with linear mixed effects model. The baseline biomarkers and increases during admission were related to venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence and clinical outcomes in a Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression analysis. Results Lp(a) levels increased significantly by a mean of 16.9 mg/dl in patients with COVID-19 during the first 21 days after admission. Serial Lp(a) measurements were available in 146 patients. In the top tertile of Lp(a) increase, 56.2% of COVID-19 patients experienced a VTE event compared to 18.4% in the lowest tertile (RR 3.06, 95% CI 1.61–5.81; p, Graphical abstract Image 1

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels vary in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and can be explained by a single deleterious genetic variant or by the aggregate effect of multiple, common small-effect variants that can be captured in a polygenic score (PS). We set out to investigate the contribution of a previously published PS to the inter-individual LDL-C variation and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk in patients with a clinical FH phenotype. METHODS: First, in a cohort of 628 patients referred for genetic FH testing, we evaluated the distribution of a PS for LDL-C comprising 12 genetic variants. Next, we determined its association with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk using UK Biobank data. RESULTS: The mean PS was higher in 533 FH-variant-negative patients (FH/M-) compared with 95 FH-variant carriers (1.02 vs 0.94, p < 0.001). 39% of all patients had a PS equal to the top 20% from a population-based reference cohort and these patients were less likely to carry an FH variant (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.48) compared with patients in the lowest 20%. In UK Biobank data, the PS explained 7.4% of variance in LDL-C levels and was associated with incident CAD. Addition of PS to a prediction model using age and sex and LDL-C did not increase the c-statistic for predicting CAD risk. CONCLUSIONS: This 12-variant PS was higher in FH/M- patients and associated with incident CAD in UK Biobank data. However, the PS did not improve predictive accuracy when added to the readily available characteristics age, sex and LDL-C, suggesting limited discriminative value for CAD.

Lipid-driven cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is caused by atherogenic apolipoprotein B (apoB) particles containing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and resembles a large and modifiable proportion of the total CVD risk. While a surplus of novel lipid-lowering therapies has been developed in recent years, management of lipid-driven CVD risk in the Netherlands remains suboptimal. To lower LDL‑C levels, statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibiting antibodies are the current standard of therapy. With the approval of bempedoic acid and the silencing RNA inclisiran, therapeutic options are expanding continuously. Although the use of triglyceride-lowering therapies remains a matter of debate, post hoc analyses consistently show a benefit in subsets of patients with high triglyceride or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Pemafibrate and novel apoC-III could be efficacious options when approved for clinical use. Lp(a)-lowering therapies such as pelacarsen are under clinical investigation, offering a potent Lp(a)-lowering effect. If proven effective in reducing cardiovascular endpoints, Lp(a) lowering holds promise to be the third axis of effective lipid-lowering therapies. Using these three components of lipid-lowering treatment, the contribution of apoB-containing lipid particles to the CVD risk may be fully eradicated in the next decade.

Background: Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare, autosomal recessive genetic disorder characterized by a marked increase in plasma triglyceride (TG) levels and recurrent episodes of pancreatitis. The response to conventional TG-lowering therapies is suboptimal. Volanesorsen, an antisense oligonucleotide that targets hepatic apoC-III mRNA, has been shown to significantly reduce TGs in patients with FCS. Objective: To further evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended treatment with volanesorsen in patients with FCS. Methods: This phase 3 open-label extension study evaluated the efficacy and safety of extended treatment with volanesorsen in three groups of patients with FCS: Those who had previously received volanesorsen or placebo in the APPROACH and COMPASS studies, and treatment-naive patients not participating in either study. Key endpoints included change in fasting TG and other lipid measurements, and safety over 52 weeks. Results: Volanesorsen treatment resulted in sustained reductions in plasma TG levels in previously treated patients from the APPROACH and COMPASS studies. Volanesorsen-treated patients from the three populations studied had mean decreases in fasting plasma TGs from index study baseline to months 3, 6, 12 and 24 as follows: decreases of 48%, 55%, 50%, and 50%, respectively (APPROACH); decreases of 65%, 43%, 42%, and 66%, respectively (COMPASS); and decreases of 60%, 51%, 47%, and 46%, respectively (treatment-naive). Common adverse events were injection site reactions and platelet count decrease, consistent with previous studies. Conclusion: Extended open-label treatment with volanesorsen in patients with FCS resulted in sustained reductions of plasma TG levels and safety consistent with the index studies.

Background: Statins are the primary therapy in patient with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Non-adherence to statin therapy is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Objective: We constructed a dynamic prediction model to predict statin adherence for an individual HeFH patient for each upcoming statin prescription. Methods: All patients with HeFH, identified by the Dutch Familial Hypercholesterolemia screening program between 1994 and 2014, were eligible. National pharmacy records dated between 1995 and 2015 were linked. We developed a dynamic prediction model that estimates the probability of statin adherence (defined as proportion of days covered >80%) for an upcoming prescription using a mixed effect logistic regression model. Static and dynamic patient-specific predictors, as well as data on a patient's adherence to past prescriptions were included. The model with the lowest AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) value was selected. Results: We included 1094 patients for whom 21,171 times a statin was prescribed. Based on the model with the lowest AIC, age at HeFH diagnosis, history of cardiovascular event, time since HeFH diagnosis and duration of the next statin prescription contributed to an increased adherence, while adherence decreased with higher untreated LDL-C levels and higher intensity of statin therapy. The dynamic prediction model showed an area under the curve of 0.63 at HeFH diagnosis, which increased to 0.85 after six years of treatment. Conclusion: This dynamic prediction model enables clinicians to identify HeFH patients at risk for non-adherence during statin treatment. These patients can be offered timely interventions to improve adherence and further reduce cardiovascular risk.

In 2022, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) published a new consensus statement on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], summarizing current knowledge about its causal association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis. One of the novelties of this statement is a new risk calculator showing how Lp(a) influences lifetime risk for ASCVD and that global risk may be underestimated substantially in individuals with high or very high Lp(a) concentration. The statement also provides practical advice on how knowledge about Lp(a) concentration can be used to modulate risk factor management, given that specific and highly effective mRNA-targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are still in clinical development. This advice counters the attitude: "Why should I measure Lp(a) if I can't lower it?". Subsequent to publication, questions have arisen relating to how the recommendations of this statement impact everyday clinical practice and ASCVD management. This review addresses 30 of the most frequently asked questions about Lp(a) epidemiology, its contribution to cardiovascular risk, Lp(a) measurement, risk factor management and existing therapeutic options.

ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence and quantity of aortic valve calcium (AVC) in two large cohorts, stratified according to age and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), and to assess the association between Lp(a) and AVC.MethodsWe included 2412 participants from the population-based Rotterdam Study (52% women, mean age=69.6±6.3 years) and 859 apparently healthy individuals from the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) outpatient clinic (57% women, mean age=45.9±11.6 years). All individuals underwent blood sampling to determine Lp(a) concentration and non-enhanced cardiac CT to assess AVC. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations of Lp(a) with the presence and amount of AVC.ResultsThe prevalence of AVC was 33.1% in the Rotterdam Study and 5.4% in the Amsterdam UMC cohort. Higher Lp(a) concentrations were independently associated with presence of AVC in both cohorts (OR per 50 mg/dL increase in Lp(a): 1.54 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.75) in the Rotterdam Study cohort and 2.02 (95% CI 1.19 to 3.44) in the Amsterdam UMC cohort). In the Rotterdam Study cohort, higher Lp(a) concentrations were also associated with increase in aortic valve Agatston score (β 0.19, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.32 per 50 mg/dL increase).ConclusionsLp(a) is robustly associated with presence of AVC in a wide age range of individuals. These results provide further rationale to assess the effect of Lp(a) lowering interventions in individuals with early AVC to prevent end-stage aortic valve stenosis.

Purpose of review Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a likely causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve disease, confirmed by Mendelian randomization. With reliable assays, it has been established that Lp(a) is linearly associated with ASCVD. Current low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapies do not or minimally lower Lp(a). This review focuses on the clinical importance and therapeutic consequences of Lp(a) measurement. Recent findings Development of RNA-based Lp(a) lowering therapeutics has positioned Lp(a) as one of the principal residual risk factors to target in the battle against lipid-driven ASCVD risk. Pelacarsen, which is a liver-specific antisense oligonucleotide, has shown Lp(a) reductions up to 90% and its phase 3 trial is currently underway. Olpasiran is a small interfering RNA targeting LPA messenger RNA which is being investigated in phase 2 and has already shown dose-dependent Lp(a) reductions up to 90%. Summary Lp(a) should be measured in every patient at least once to identify patients with very high Lp(a) levels. These patients could benefit from Lp(a) lowering therapies when approved. In the meantime, therapy in high Lp(a) patients should focus on further reducing LDL-C and other ASCVD risk factors.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has risen to the level of an accepted cardiovascular disease risk factor, but final proof of causality awaits a randomized trial of Lp(a) lowering. Inhibiting apolipoprotein(a) production in the hepatocyte with ribonucleic acid therapeutics has emerged as an elegant and effective solution to reduce plasma Lp(a) levels. Phase 2 clinical trials have shown that the antisense oligonucleotide pelacarsen reduced mean Lp(a) levels by 80%, allowing 98% of subjects to reach on-treatment levels of 70 mg/dl and >90 mg/dl, in which either of the two being positive will lead to a successful trial. Additional ribonucleic acid–targeted therapies to lower Lp(a) are in preclinical and clinical development. The testing of the Lp(a) hypothesis will provide proof whether Lp(a)-mediated risk can be abolished by potent Lp(a) lowering.

Objective: To determine whether MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1) levels in human atherosclerotic plaques associate with plaque vulnerability features. Approach and Results: We measured MCP-1 levels in human atherosclerotic plaque samples from 1199 patients in the Athero-EXPRESS Biobank who underwent endarterectomy for treatment of carotid stenosis. We explored associations with histopathologic and molecular features of plaque vulnerability, clinical plaque manifestations, and vascular events up to 3 years after endarterectomy. Following adjustments for age, sex, and vascular risk factors, MCP-1 plaque levels were associated with histopathologic markers of plaque vulnerability (large lipid core, low collagen content, high macrophage burden, low smooth muscle cell burden, intraplaque hemorrhage) and with a composite vulnerability index (range 0–5, β per SD increment in MCP-1, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.30–0.53], P =5.4×10 −13 ). We further found significant associations with higher plaque levels of other chemokines and proinflammatory molecules and markers of neovascularization and matrix turnover. When exploring clinical plaque instability, MCP-1 plaque levels were higher among individuals with symptomatic plaques as compared with those with asymptomatic plaques (odds ratio per SD increment in MCP-1, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.09–1.69]). MCP-1 levels were further associated with a higher risk of periprocedural major adverse vascular events and strokes occurring in the first 30 days after plaque removal. Conclusions: Higher MCP-1 plaque levels are associated with histopathologic, molecular, and clinical hallmarks of plaque vulnerability in individuals undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Our findings highlight a role of MCP-1 in clinical plaque instability in humans and complement previous epidemiological, genetic, and experimental studies supporting the translational perspective of targeting MCP-1 signaling in atherosclerosis.

Patients with refractory hypercholesterolemia, who have high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels despite treatment with lipid-lowering therapies at maximum tolerated doses, have an increased risk of atherosclerosis. In such patients, the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous and intravenous evinacumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against angiopoietin-like 3, are not known.In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients with or without heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia who had refractory hypercholesterolemia, with a screening LDL cholesterol level of 70 mg per deciliter or higher with atherosclerosis or of 100 mg per deciliter or higher without atherosclerosis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous or intravenous evinacumab or placebo. The primary end point was the percent change from baseline in the LDL cholesterol level at week 16 with evinacumab as compared with placebo.In total, 272 patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: subcutaneous evinacumab at a dose of 450 mg weekly (40 patients), 300 mg weekly (43 patients), or 300 mg every 2 weeks (39 patients) or placebo (41 patients); or intravenous evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg per kilogram of body weight every 4 weeks (39 patients) or 5 mg per kilogram every 4 weeks (36 patients) or placebo (34 patients). At week 16, the differences in the least-squares mean change from baseline in the LDL cholesterol level between the groups assigned to receive subcutaneous evinacumab at a dose of 450 mg weekly, 300 mg weekly, and 300 mg every 2 weeks and the placebo group were -56.0, -52.9, and -38.5 percentage points, respectively (P0.001 for all comparisons). The differences between the groups assigned to receive intravenous evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg per kilogram and 5 mg per kilogram and the placebo group were -50.5 percentage points (P0.001) and -24.2 percentage points, respectively. The incidence of serious adverse events during the treatment period ranged from 3 to 16% across trial groups.In patients with refractory hypercholesterolemia, the use of evinacumab significantly reduced the LDL cholesterol level, by more than 50% at the maximum dose. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03175367.).

Purpose of review Studies reaffirm that familial hypercholesterolemia is more prevalent than initially considered, with a population frequency of approximately one in 300. The majority of patients remains unidentified. This warrants critical evaluation of existing screening methods and exploration of novel methods of detection. Recent findings New public policy recommendations on the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia have been made by a global community of experts and advocates. Phenotypic tools for diagnosing index cases remain inaccurate. Genetic testing is the gold standard for familial hypercholesterolemia and a new international position statement has been published. Correction of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) for the cholesterol content of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] may increase the precision of the phenotypic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Cascade cotesting for familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated Lp(a) levels provides a new opportunity to stratify risk in families. Digital technology and machine learning methods, coupled with clinical alert and decision support systems, lead the way in more efficient approaches for detecting and managing index cases. Universal screening of children, combined with child-parent cascade testing, appears to be the most effective method for underpinning a population strategy for maximizing the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia. Summary Detection of familial hypercholesterolemia can be enhanced by optimizing current diagnostic algorithms, probing electronic health records with novel information technologies and integrating universal screening of children with cascade testing of parents and other relatives.

Background and aims: Statins suppress hepatic mRNA expression of ANGPTL3 encoding angiopoietin-like 3 in healthy subjects, but it is unknown if plasma ANGPTL3 concentrations are affected by statins prescribed to hypercholesterolemic patients in clinical practice. We therefore investigated the effect of statin treatment on plasma ANGPTL3 concentrations in hypercholesterolemic patients. In addition, we explored the underlying mechanism by which statins regulate ANGPTL3 in vitro. Methods: Plasma ANGPTL3 concentrations were measured in 93 genetically confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients who were using statin therapy and 61 statin naïve FH patients. Moreover, concentrations were measured in 14 hypercholesterolemic patients who discontinued their statin treatment for 4 weeks. In vitro studies were performed with Huh7 human hepatoma cells. Results: Plasma ANGPTL3 concentrations were 15% lower in statin treated FH patients compared to statin naïve FH patients (145 (120-193) vs. 167 (135-220) ng/ml, p = 0.012). Statin discontinuation resulted in a 21% (p

Introduction Clinicians, payers, guideline committees, and policymakers support the use of high-intensity statins in patients at high risk for complications of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Guidelines and recommendations provide guidance on next steps for patients with inadequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control on maximally tolerated statin or for those who are statin-intolerant. Ezetimibe and evolocumab improve CV outcomes when added to statins in high-CV-risk populations. The aim of the study was to compare evolocumab and ezetimibe for lipid-lowering efficacy and safety. Methods We summarized data from 1427 patients from three phase 3 evolocumab studies comparing double-blinded evolocumab vs. ezetimibe. These studies evaluated four distinct populations: those free of CVD receiving each agent as monotherapy, patients with CVD receiving add-on therapy to low- or high-intensity statin, and statin-intolerant patients. Lipid efficacy and safety were reported at week 12. Results Across the studies, evolocumab reduced LDL-C by a mean 55–61% from baseline to week 12; ezetimibe lowered LDL-C by 18–20% from baseline (mean difference = 38–43% favoring evolocumab; p, Plain language summary A statin is a type of medication that is used, with diet and exercise, to lower cholesterol levels and help prevent a heart attack or stroke caused by atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis is the hardening and narrowing of blood vessels known as arteries from a buildup of plaque, usually made up of cholesterol and other fatty substances. LDL cholesterol, also known as “bad” cholesterol, is one of the most important risk factors for having a heart attack, and can be lowered. Patients with a high risk of heart disease may benefit from the additional lowering of LDL cholesterol beyond that achieved by statins alone. The medication evolocumab reduced LDL cholesterol levels and improved other risk factors more than the medication ezetimibe in four studies. These studies included patients who were receiving statins and those who were not, including those who did not receive statins because of statin-related side effects. Both evolocumab and ezetimibe had good safety profiles.

The endothelium is crucial for maintaining vascular homeostasis and functions as a barrier between blood components and tissue. In atherosclerosis, this barrier function is impaired, which is characterized by secretion of chemoattractants and cytokines, upregulation of adhesion molecules and increased vascular permeability. This facilitates enhanced leukocyte migration through the vessel wall. Fortunately, we can utilize these features to our advantage by using nanomedicine to deliver drugs and imaging tracers into the interstitial space. This provides us with targeted, local delivery of therapeutic agents, which enhances the specificity and efficacy of these agents and thus, could be used to inhibit disease progression. Additionally, delivery of imaging tracers in the interstitial space will give us insight into the vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaques by targeting resident macrophages and activated endothelial cells, providing pivotal information that is currently lacking in the clinic. In this review, we discuss how the endothelial barrier is affected during atherosclerosis and how to surmount this barrier for successful delivery of nanomedicine carrying drugs and imaging tracers to both the endothelium and macrophages.

Background and aims: Severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Experimental evidence suggests that this risk may be mediated by chronic sympathetic hyperactivation and systemic inflammation, but the precise mechanisms remain to be unraveled. Our aim was to evaluate whether severe OSA patients are characterized by increased sympathetic and hematopoietic activity, potentially driving atherosclerosis. Methods: Untreated patients with severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) > 30 per hour) were matched with mild OSA patients (AHI5 per hour) according to age, sex, and body mass index. Study objectives were to assess baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and heart-rate variability (HRV) using continuous finger blood pressure measurements, hematopoietic activity in the bone marrow and spleen, and arterial inflammation with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Results: A total of 34 subjects, 17 per group, were included in the analysis. Mean age was 60.7 ± 6.2 years, 24 (70.6%) were male. Mean AHI was 40.5 ± 12.6 per hour in the severe OSA group, and 10.5 ± 3.4 per hour in the mild OSA group. Participants with severe OSA were characterized by reduced BRS (5.7 [4.6–7.8] ms/mmHg in severe vs 8.2 [6.9–11.8] ms/mmHg in mild OSA, p = 0.033) and increased splenic activity (severe OSA 18F-FDG uptake 3.56 ± 0.77 vs mild OSA 3.01 ± 0.68; p = 0.036). HRV, bone marrow activity and arterial inflammation were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Patients with severe OSA are characterized by decreased BRS and increased splenic activity. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to assess whether OSA treatment reduces sympathetic and splenic activity.

Aims In the era of personalized medicine, it is of utmost importance to be able to identify subjects at the highest cardiovascular (CV) risk. To date, single biomarkers have failed to markedly improve the estimation of CV risk. Using novel technology, simultaneous assessment of large numbers of biomarkers may hold promise to improve prediction. In the present study, we compared a protein-based risk model with a model using traditional risk factors in predicting CV events in the primary prevention setting of the European Prospective Investigation (EPIC)-Norfolk study, followed by validation in the Progressione della Lesione Intimale Carotidea (PLIC) cohort. Methods and results Using the proximity extension assay, 368 proteins were measured in a nested case–control sample of 822 individuals from the EPIC-Norfolk prospective cohort study and 702 individuals from the PLIC cohort. Using tree-based ensemble and boosting methods, we constructed a protein-based prediction model, an optimized clinical risk model, and a model combining both. In the derivation cohort (EPIC-Norfolk), we defined a panel of 50 proteins, which outperformed the clinical risk model in the prediction of myocardial infarction [area under the curve (AUC) 0.754 vs. 0.730; P < 0.001] during a median follow-up of 20 years. The clinically more relevant prediction of events occurring within 3 years showed an AUC of 0.732 using the clinical risk model and an AUC of 0.803 for the protein model (P < 0.001). The predictive value of the protein panel was confirmed to be superior to the clinical risk model in the validation cohort (AUC 0.705 vs. 0.609; P < 0.001). Conclusion In a primary prevention setting, a proteome-based model outperforms a model comprising clinical risk factors in predicting the risk of CV events. Validation in a large prospective primary prevention cohort is required to address the value for future clinical implementation in CV prevention., Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract

Background and aims Infusion of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) mimetics failed to induce regression of atherosclerosis in recent randomized clinical trials. However, patients in these previous trials had normal levels of HDL-cholesterol, which potentially limited efficacy. Patients with very low levels of HDL-cholesterol and impaired cholesterol efflux capacity can be expected to derive the most potential benefit from infusion of HDL mimetics. This randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of infusions of the HDL mimetic CER-001 in patients with genetically determined very low levels of HDL cholesterol. Methods In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, we recruited patients with familial hypoalphalipoproteinemia (due to ABCA1 and/or APOA1 loss-of-function variants). Participants were randomized to intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg CER-001 or placebo (2:1 ratio), comprising 9 weekly infusions followed by infusions every two weeks. Patients underwent repeated 3T-MRI to assess mean vessel wall area and 18F-FDG PET/CT to quantify arterial wall inflammation. Results A total of 30 patients with a mean age of 52.7 ± 7.4 years and HDL-cholesterol of 0.35 ± 0.25 mmol/L were recruited. After 24 weeks, the absolute change in mean vessel wall area was not significantly different in the CER-001 group compared with placebo (n = 27; treatment difference: 0.77 mm2, p = 0.21). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in carotid arterial wall inflammation (n = 24, treatment difference: 0.10 target-to-background ratio of the most diseased segment, p = 0.33) after 24 weeks. Conclusion In patients with genetically determined very low HDL-cholesterol, 24 weeks of treatment with HDL mimetic CER-001 did not reduce carotid vessel wall dimensions or arterial wall inflammation, compared with placebo.

Hereditary angioedema is characterized by recurrent and unpredictable episodes of subcutaneous and mucosal swelling that can be life threatening. IONIS-PKK-LRx is a ligand-conjugated antisense oligonucleotide designed for receptor-mediated delivery to hepatocytes. In a compassionate-use pilot study, two patients with severe bradykinin-mediated angioedema were initially administered weekly subcutaneous injections of the unconjugated parent drug, IONIS-PKKRx, for 12 to 16 weeks, after which they received IONIS-PKK-LRx at a dose of 80 mg every 3 to 4 weeks for 7 to 8 months. Treatment was accompanied by a reduction in the angioedema attack rate. (Funded by Amsterdam UMC.).

Background: Lipoproteins are important regulators of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) biology, predominantly affecting myelopoiesis. Since myeloid cells, including monocytes and macrophages, promote the inflammatory response that propagates atherosclerosis, it is of interest whether the atherogenic low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] contributes to atherogenesis via stimulating myelopoiesis. Methods & results: To assess the effects of Lp(a)-priming on long-term HSPC behavior we transplanted BM of Lp(a) transgenic mice, that had been exposed to elevated levels of Lp(a), into lethally-irradiated C57Bl6 mice and hematopoietic reconstitution was analyzed. No differences in HSPC populations or circulating myeloid cells were detected ten weeks after transplantation. Likewise, in vitro stimulation of C57Bl6 BM cells for 24 h with Lp(a) did not affect colony formation, total cell numbers or myeloid populations 7 days later. To assess the effects of elevated levels of Lp(a) on myelopoiesis, C57Bl6 bone marrow (BM) cells were stimulated with lp(a) for 24 h, and a marked increase in granulocyte-monocyte progenitors, pro-inflammatory Ly6high monocytes and macrophages was observed. Seven days of continuous exposure to Lp(a) increased colony formation and enhanced the formation of pro-inflammatory monocytes and macrophages. Antibody-mediated neutralization of oxidized phospholipids abolished the Lp(a)-induced effects on myelopoiesis. Conclusion: Lp(a) enhances the production of inflammatory monocytes at the bone marrow level but does not induce cell-intrinsic long-term priming of HSPCs. Given the short-term and direct nature of this effect, we postulate that Lp(a)-lowering treatment has the capacity to rapidly revert this multi-level inflammatory response.

Background and aims The rare ASGR1 del12 variant is associated with a beneficial effect on coronary artery disease (CAD) that is disproportionate to the small reductions in plasma LDL cholesterol (LDLc). This unexplained benefit has sparked the debate on potential additional pleiotropic effects of ASGR1 variants. Since ASGR1 has also been implicated in platelet homeostasis, we evaluated platelet function in heterozygous ASGR1 del12 carriers and controls. In addition, we compared the magnitude of various LDLc lowering genetic scores in the UK-biobank using Mendelian randomization. Methods Desialylation of platelet surface glycoproteins and platelet aggregation capacity were measured in 12 carriers and 10 controls. We selected 3 common genetic variants in the ASGR1 locus that were significantly associated with plasma LDLc and assessed the association with coronary artery disease (CAD) and compared it with the effects of HMCGR, LDLR, NCI1L1 and PCSK9 gene scores. Results Platelet surface GlcNAC residues were significantly lower in carriers but platelet aggregation did not differ. The relative risk reduction of ASGR1 GRS on CAD and myocardial infarction per 10 mg/dl LDLc reduction was 23% (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62 – 0.96). This risk reduction was proportionally similar to the gene risk scores in HMCGR, NPC1L1, PCSK9, and LDLR. Conclusions Unlike previous reports, we did not find any evidence for a pleiotropic effect of the rare del12 variant in the ASGR1 locus on CAD, as platelet function did not differ between carriers and controls. Moreover, the observed effect of ASGR1 variants on CAD risk was proportional to the reduction in plasma LDLc levels.

Aims Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is strongly associated with an increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. We previously reported that pro-inflammatory activation of circulating monocytes is a potential mechanism by which Lp(a) mediates CVD. Since potent Lp(a)-lowering therapies are emerging, it is of interest whether patients with elevated Lp(a) experience beneficial anti-inflammatory effects following large reductions in Lp(a). Methods and results Using transcriptome analysis, we show that circulating monocytes of healthy individuals with elevated Lp(a), as well as CVD patients with increased Lp(a) levels, both have a pro-inflammatory gene expression profile. The effect of Lp(a)-lowering on gene expression and function of monocytes was addressed in two local sub-studies, including 14 CVD patients with elevated Lp(a) who received apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] antisense (AKCEA-APO(a)-LRx) (NCT03070782), as well as 18 patients with elevated Lp(a) who received proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibody (PCSK9ab) treatment (NCT02729025). AKCEA-APO(a)-LRx lowered Lp(a) by 47% and reduced the pro-inflammatory gene expression in monocytes of CVD patients with elevated Lp(a), which coincided with a functional reduction in transendothelial migration capacity of monocytes ex vivo (−17%, P Conclusion Potent Lp(a)-lowering following AKCEA-APO(a)-LRx, but not modest Lp(a)-lowering combined with LDL-C reduction following PCSK9ab treatment, reduced the pro-inflammatory state of circulating monocytes in patients with elevated Lp(a). These ex vivo data support a beneficial effect of large Lp(a) reductions in patients with elevated Lp(a).

Purpose of review Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III) and angiopoietin like protein 3 (angptl3) have emerged as key regulators of triglyceride metabolism. Based on Mendelian randomisation studies, novel therapeutic strategies inhibiting these proteins using monoclonal antibodies or gene silencing techniques might reduce residual cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in dyslipidemic patients. This article aims to review the role of apoC-III and angptl3 in triglyceride metabolism and combine early clinical evidence of CVD reducing potential of these new therapeutic targets. Recent findings Angptl3 inhibition by mAb or antisense therapy has recently completed phase I and II studies, respectively and demonstrate robust apolipoprotein B (apoB) lowering up to 46%. Volanesorsen is an antisense therapy approved for patients with extremely elevated plasma triglyceride levels in which it showed no consistent apoB reduction. However, the GalNAc-conjugated oligonucleotide showed moderate (up to ∼30%) apoB reduction in a phase 1/2a dose-finding study. Summary Angptl3 and apoC-III are novel targets in lipoprotein metabolism that reduce triglycerides when inhibited. The expected CVD risk reduction may be mediated through reduced triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particle number, reflected by apoB, rather than triglyceride reduction per se. Limited human evidence shows that apoC-III and angptl3 inhibition both potently lower triglycerides, but since angptl3 inhibition reduces apoB more robustly it may be expected to confer more favorable CVD risk reduction.

Rationale: Patients with elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are hallmarked by increased metabolic activity in the arterial wall on positron emission tomography/computed tomography, indicative of a proinflammatory state. Objective: We hypothesized that Lp(a) induces endothelial cell inflammation by rewiring endothelial metabolism. Methods and Results: We evaluated the impact of Lp(a) on the endothelium and describe that Lp(a), through its oxidized phospholipid content, activates arterial endothelial cells, facilitating increased transendothelial migration of monocytes. Transcriptome analysis of Lp(a)-stimulated human arterial endothelial cells revealed upregulation of inflammatory pathways comprising monocyte adhesion and migration, coinciding with increased 6-phophofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase (PFKFB)-3–mediated glycolysis. ICAM (intercellular adhesion molecule)-1 and PFKFB3 were also found to be upregulated in carotid plaques of patients with elevated levels of Lp(a). Inhibition of PFKFB3 abolished the inflammatory signature with concomitant attenuation of transendothelial migration. Conclusions: Collectively, our findings show that Lp(a) activates the endothelium by enhancing PFKFB3-mediated glycolysis, leading to a proadhesive state, which can be reversed by inhibition of glycolysis. These findings pave the way for therapeutic agents targeting metabolism aimed at reducing inflammation in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. High plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are a key CVD-risk factor. Triglyceride-rich remnant particles and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) are also causally related to CVD. Consequently, therapeutic strategies for lowering LDL-C and triglyceride levels are widely used in routine clinical practice; however, specific Lp(a) lowering agents are not available. Many patients do not achieve guideline-recommended lipid levels with currently available therapies; hence, novel targets and treatment modalities are eagerly sought. Areas covered: We discuss the milestones on the trajectory toward the full application of gene-based therapies in daily clinical practice. We describe the different methods, ranging from antisense oligonucleotides to liver-directed gene therapy and Crispr-cas9 modification to target the pivotal players in lipid metabolism: PCSK9, APOB, ANGPTL3, Lp(a), LDLR, and apoC-III. Expert opinion: While acknowledging their different stages of development, gene-based therapies are likely to invoke a paradigm shift in lipid management because they allow us to target previously undruggable targets. Moreover, their low dosing frequency, high target selectivity, and relatively predictable adverse event profile are considered major advantages over current lipid-lowering therapies.

[Background]: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare inherited disorder resulting in extremely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Current guidance about its management and prognosis stems from small studies, mostly from high-income countries. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and genetic characteristics, as well as the impact, of current practice on health outcomes of HoFH patients globally., [Methods]: The HoFH International Clinical Collaborators registry collected data on patients with a clinical, or genetic, or both, diagnosis of HoFH using a retrospective cohort study design. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04815005., [Findings]: Overall, 751 patients from 38 countries were included, with 565 (75%) reporting biallelic pathogenic variants. The median age of diagnosis was 12∙0 years (IQR 5∙5–27∙0) years. Of the 751 patients, 389 (52%) were female and 362 (48%) were male. Race was reported for 527 patients; 338 (64%) patients were White, 121 (23%) were Asian, and 68 (13%) were Black or mixed race. The major manifestations of ASCVD or aortic stenosis were already present in 65 (9%) of patients at diagnosis of HoFH. Globally, pretreatment LDL cholesterol levels were 14∙7 mmol/L (IQR 11∙6–18∙4). Among patients with detailed therapeutic information, 491 (92%) of 534 received statins, 342 (64%) of 534 received ezetimibe, and 243 (39%) of 621 received lipoprotein apheresis. On-treatment LDL cholesterol levels were lower in high-income countries (3∙93 mmol/L, IQR 2∙6–5∙8) versus non-highincome countries (9∙3 mmol/L, 6∙7–12∙7), with greater use of three or more lipid-lowering therapies (LLT; highincome 66% vs non-high-income 24%) and consequently more patients attaining guideline-recommended LDL cholesterol goals (high-income 21% vs non-high-income 3%). A first major adverse cardiovascular event occurred a decade earlier in non-high-income countries, at a median age of 24∙5 years (IQR 17∙0–34∙5) versus 37∙0 years (29∙0–49∙0) in high-income countries (adjusted hazard ratio 1∙64, 95% CI 1∙13–2∙38)., [Interpretation]: Worldwide, patients with HoFH are diagnosed too late, undertreated, and at high premature ASCVD risk. Greater use of multi-LLT regimens is associated with lower LDL cholesterol levels and better outcomes. Significant global disparities exist in treatment regimens, control of LDL cholesterol levels, and cardiovascular event-free survival, which demands a critical re-evaluation of global health policy to reduce inequalities and improve outcomes for all patients with HoFH., Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; and European Atherosclerosis Society