Search

The purpose of this study was to report the incidence of infection after conversion from external fixation (EF) to internal fixation (IF) of distal radius fractures and to evaluate the relationship between infection and secondary variables, including time to conversion from EF to IF, internal hardware overlapping EF pin sites, and definitive fixation with a dorsal-spanning bridge plate.A retrospective review was performed at 2 level 1 trauma centers including all patients aged ≥18 years from 2006 to 2019 with a distal radius fracture treated initially with EF followed by subsequent IF. The patients were excluded from analysis if they had10 weeks of clinical follow-up, a history of prior distal radius surgery, or evidence of infection before EF to IF conversion. Patient demographic data, mechanism of injury, presence of hardware overlapping pin sites, and timing to definitive fixation were obtained from the medical records. Infection was defined as positive intraoperative cultures or documented return to the operating room for debridement after IF.A total of 64 fractures in 61 patients with a median age of 50 years (range, 18-75 years) were included. Infections developed in 6 patients (6 of 64 fractures). The incidence of infection was higher in patients with a time to conversion from EF to IF of14 days (infection in 2 of 5 patients vs 4 of 59 patients). The incidence of infection was similar in patients with and without hardware overlapping EF pin sites (3 of 27 vs 3 of 37, respectively).Infections occurred in 6 of 64 distal radius fractures following conversion from EF to IF, and delay in conversion of14 days was associated with an increased infection risk.Therapeutic IV.

Background The effect of rapidly increasing student debt on medical students’ ultimate career plans is of particular interest to residency programs desiring to enhance recruitment, including primary care specialties. Previous survey studies of medical students indicate that amount of student debt influences choice of medical specialty. Research on this topic to date remains unclear, and few studies have included the average income of different specialties in analyses. The purpose of this study is to observe whether empirical data demonstrates an association between debt of graduating medical students and specialties into which students match. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of a public institution including data from graduation years 2010–2015. For each included student, total educational debt at graduation and matched specialty were obtained. Average income of each specialty was also obtained. Statistical hypothesis testing was performed to analyze any differences in average debt among specialties; subanalysis was performed assessing debt for primary care (PC) versus non-primary care (NPC) specialties. Correlation between student debt and average specialty income was also evaluated. Results One thousand three hundred ten students met the inclusion criteria and 178 were excluded for a final study population of 1132 (86%). The average debt was $182,590. Average debt was not significantly different among the different specialties (P = 0.576). There was no significant difference in average debt between PC and NPC specialties (PC $182,345 ± $64,457, NPC $182,868 ± $70,420, P = 0.342). There was no correlation between average specialty income and graduation debt (Spearman’s rho = 0.021, P = 0.482). Conclusions At our institution, student indebtedness did not appear to affect matched medical specialty, and no correlation between debt and average specialty income was observed. Different subspecialties and residency programs interested in recruiting more students or increasing diversity may consider addressing alternative factors which may have a stronger influence on student choices.

Background: The arthroscopic “bony Bankart bridge” (BBB) repair technique was recently shown to successfully restore shoulder stability at short-term follow-up, but longer-term outcomes have not yet been described. Purpose: To report the outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up after BBB repair for anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients were included if they sustained a bony Bankart lesion, were treated with a BBB technique, and were at least 5 years postoperative. Patients were excluded if they underwent concomitant rotator cuff repair or an open bone fragment reduction. All patients were assessed with the following measures preoperatively and at final evaluation: QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary. Results: From 2008 to 2012, 13 patients who underwent BBB met the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 39.6 years (range, 19.1-68.8 years) and a mean follow-up of 6.7 years (range, 5.1-9.0 years). Mean time from most recent injury to surgery was 6.3 months (range, 1 day–36 months). The mean glenoid bone loss was 22.5% (range, 9.1%-38.6%). Mean SF-12 scores demonstrated significant improvement from 45.8 (SD, 9.7) preoperatively to 55.1 (SD, 5.9) at a mean follow-up of 6.7 years. At final follow-up, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 93.1 (range, 68.3-100); the mean QuickDASH score, 6.2 (range, 0-25); and the mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, 92.8 (range, 69-99). None of the patients progressed to further shoulder surgery. Three of 13 patients (23%) reported subjective recurrent instability. At final follow-up, 9 of 12 (75%) patients indicated that their sports participation levels were equal to their preinjury levels. Median patient satisfaction at final follow-up was 10 of 10 points (range, 3-10). Conclusion: The arthroscopic BBB technique for patients with anterior bony Bankart lesions can restore shoulder stability, yield durable improvements in clinical outcomes, and provide a high return-to-sport rate at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Three of 13 patients experienced postoperative symptoms of instability but did not undergo further stabilization surgery.

Treatment of young, active patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) is challenging because shoulder arthroplasty may not be ideal in this population. In the past two decades, joint-preserving arthroscopic management options for GHOA, including débridement, have been used to treat different pathologies related to GHOA to reduce pain, to improve function, and to delay or even avoid arthroplasty. Key aspects of comprehensively addressing GHOA arthroscopically include chondroplasty, synovectomy, loose body removal, humeral osteoplasty with excision of the goat's beard osteophyte, capsular release, subacromial and subcoracoid decompression, axillary nerve decompression, and biceps tenodesis. Although data are still emerging, clinical studies report that an arthroscopic approach to glenohumeral arthritis using these various procedures reduces pain, improves function, and improves clinical outcome scores in the short- to mid-term follow-up period. Additional high-level studies are warranted to evaluate long-term outcomes and durability following this procedure.

The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes following Achilles tendon allograft-augmented latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) for the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with a minimum of 2 years post-operative follow-up. We hypothesized that patients would show significant improvement in outcomes scores with a low failure rate. Patients who were treated with Achilles tendon allograft-augmented LDTT for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Patient-reported outcomes scores, including ASES, QuickDASH, SANE, SF-12 PCS, and satisfaction, were collected pre- and post-operatively. Pre- and post-operative scores were compared with a Wilcoxon test. Revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was considered as failure. Between March 2006 and November 2014, a total of 16 patients with a mean age of 49 years (range 34–57 years) were included. Minimum 2-year outcomes data were available for 14 of the 16 patients (87.5%) with a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (range 2.1–10.5 years). Two patients (12.5%) advanced to RTSA at a mean of 1.1 years following LDTT. Postoperative median subjective outcomes scores improved, but did not reach statistical significance (SF-12 PCS: 35.4–46.4, P = 0.182; ASES: 47.5–69.9, P = 0.209; QuickDASH: 57.9–31.8, P = 0.176; SANE: 40.0–39.5, P = 0.273). Median post-operative patient satisfaction was 5 on a 10-point scale (range 1–10). Patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears treated with Achilles tendon allograft-augmented latissimus dorsi tendon transfer did not experience significant post-operative improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Thus, the use of an additional allograft-augmentation remains questionable. Retrospective case series, level IV.

Type IV SLAP tears involve bucket-handle tears of the superior labrum with the tears extending into the biceps tendon. Surgical treatment options involve either primary repair or biceps tenodesis. Recent literature has shown good clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis for the treatment of type II and IV SLAP lesions. The purpose of this article is to present our technique for arthroscopic superior labrum repair with suture anchors and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw.

Economic pressure highlights the critical need for appropriate diagnosis and treatment of various shoulder pathologies since under-diagnosis and under-treatment can result in increased costs to society in the form of disability and lost production. On the other hand, aggressive over-treatment can further inflate already burgeoning health-care costs and potentially harm the patient. Therefore, it is crucial to distinguish the indications between operative and nonoperative management, especially in common shoulder pathologies such as rotator cuff tears, anterior shoulder instability, biceps tendinitis, lesions to the acromioclavicular joint, and proximal humeral fractures. As a result, a detailed analysis of individual risk factors for potential failures should be performed and treatment should be based on individualized care with consideration given to each patient's particular injury pattern, functional demands, and long-term goals.Der zunehmende Kostendruck in der Medizin verstärkt die Notwendigkeit einer rasch zielführenden Diagnose und Therapie verschiedener pathologischer Veränderungen im Bereich der Schulter. Unterversorgte Patienten erhöhen die Kosten für die Gemeinschaft durch längere Ausfallzeiten und damit erniedrigte Produktion, während überzogene Therapien die bereits ausufernden Kosten in der medizinischen Versorgung weiter erhöhen und den Patienten sogar potenziell schädigen können. Deshalb ist es unabdingbar, die Indikationen für operative und konservative Therapien zu kennen und anzuwenden, besonders im Hinblick auf häufige pathologische Veränderungen wie Rotatorenmanschettenläsionen, vordere Schulterinstabilität, Bizepssehnentendinitis, Akromioklavikular Gelenkluxationen und proximale Humerusfrakturen. Grundsätzlich ist es dabei wichtig, individuelle Risikofaktoren für ein Therapieversagen zu erkennen, den Erwartungshorizont des Patienten bezüglich funktionaler Ansprüche und Langzeitziele abzuklären und auch das Verletzungsmuster zu analysieren, um so letztendlich die Therapie individuell an den jeweiligen Patienten anpassen zu können.

Purpose To investigate if patients younger than 50 years old had improved functional outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis (BT) for the treatment of biceps reflection pulley (BRP) lesions at minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up. Methods Patients who had arthroscopically confirmed BRP tears that were treated with subpectoral BT and were at least 2 years out from surgery were included; patients were excluded if they had concomitant reconstructive or reparative procedures at index surgery. Patient-centered outcomes including return to activity, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS) scores, and patient satisfaction were collected. The pre- and postoperative scores were compared with a Wilcoxon test. Failure was defined as revision BT. Results Between January 2006 and July 2014, of 1,184 patients who underwent open subpectoral BT, 14 patients (6 male, 8 female) with mean age 37 (range, 16-49 years) met the inclusion criteria. Minimum 2-year outcomes data were available for all 14 patients (100% follow-up). The mean follow-up was 3.6 ± 1.3 years. There were significant improvements postoperatively for all outcome scores ( P = .017 ASES, P = .002 QuickDASH, P = .003 SF-12 PCS). There was no correlation between age and outcome scores ( P > .05). Median patient satisfaction was 9 of 10. Five patients (36%) reported return to recreational activity with no modifications; 9 (64%) indicated a return to activity with modifications. The 5 patients who returned to recreational activity with no modification had significantly less time from initial injury/onset of symptoms until surgery in comparison with the 9 patients who modified their activity ( P = .028). No complications or reoperations were reported. Conclusions Patients younger than 50 years old with a symptomatic isolated BRP lesion experienced excellent results, high return to recreational activity, little postoperative pain, and high degrees of satisfaction when treated with subpectoral BT. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Os acromiale occur frequently in the population and can be a cause of significant shoulder dysfunction and rotator cuff impingement. When symptomatic os acromiale fail conservative management, surgical intervention may become necessary. The purpose of this article is to describe our preferred surgical technique for osteosynthesis of os acromiale using cannulated screws and tension-band wiring.

Chronic anterior shoulder instability due to structural failure of the subscapularis muscle and the anterior capsule is a rare and challenging diagnosis for surgeons to manage because poor-quality capsular, labral, and rotator cuff tissue often limits effective treatment options. If primary repair is not possible because of retraction and poor tissue quality, reconstruction with an allograft or autograft may be the only joint-preserving option. The purpose of this article is to describe a surgical technique for anterior capsular reconstruction using a human acellular dermal allograft for the treatment of irreparable subscapularis tears.

Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus are an uncommon and frequently missed diagnosis. Mistreated and unrecognized, these fractures can cause chronic pain and diminished shoulder range of motion and function. Operative treatment options include open reduction and internal fixation, as well as arthroscopic-assisted reduction and internal fixation. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe a bridging arthroscopic technique for the treatment of bony avulsions of the supraspinatus tendon.

INTRODUCTION Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair (RCR) techniques, midterm outcome data are limited. The purpose of this article was to assess midterm clinical outcomes of patients following arthroscopic TOE RCR using either a knotless tape bridge (TB) repair or knotted suture bridge (SB) repair technique. We hypothesized that there would be significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes with TOE RCR that would be durable over time. We also hypothesized that the knotless TB technique would yield equivalent clinical results to the knotted SB technique, but that there would be differences in retear types between the two TOE techniques. METHODS Patients included were a minimum of 5 years from an index arthroscopic double-row TOE repair using either a knotless TB or knotted SB technique for one, two, or three tendon full-thickness rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus tendon. Preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and satisfaction scores were collected. Scores were also stratified and compared based on primary and revision repair, tear location, and tear chronicity. Outcomes between techniques were contrasted, and survivorship analysis was conducted, with failure defined as progression to revision surgery. RESULTS One-hundred ninety-two shoulders were included with a mean follow-up of 6.6 years (range, 5.0 to 11.0 years). Fifteen shoulders (7.8%) underwent revision cuff repair. All scores improved significantly for TB repair (P < 0.001). For SB repair, all scores improved, but only American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary scores (P < 0.05) demonstrated statistical significance. No statistically significant differences were found between the repair techniques when stratified by primary and revision repairs, tear location, or chronicity. Postoperative clinical survivorship was 96.6% and 93.6% for knotted SB repairs and 96.7% and 93.9% for knotless TB repairs at 2 and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSION TOE RCR results in significant clinical improvement and excellent survivorship at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up, using either knotted SB or knotless TB repair techniques in primary and revision cases and in small and large tears. Equivalent results were obtained with both TOE techniques. Patients undergoing repair with a TOE showed significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes that were durable at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively.

Surgical exposure of the glenoid after previous coracoid process transfer is technically challenging as a result of distorted anatomy, obliterated soft-tissue planes, and adhesive scar tissue, which poses additional risk to adjacent neurovascular structures. The purpose of this article is to present a technique for glenoid exposure following coracoid transfer that involves tenotomy of the conjoint tendon to minimize the risk for neurovascular injury while leaving the well-healed coracoid bone graft in place.

Clavicle fractures are among the most common fractures occurring in the general population, and the vast majority are localized in the midshaft portion of the bone. Management of midshaft clavicle fractures remains controversial. Although many can be managed nonoperatively, certain patient populations and fracture patterns, such as completely displaced and shortened fractures, are at risk of less optimal outcomes with nonoperative management; surgical intervention should be considered in such cases. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate our technique of midshaft clavicle fixation using minimally invasive intramedullary fixation.

The large excursion of the latissimus dorsi muscle makes it an ideal candidate for tendon transfer as a salvage procedure in cases of massive and irreparable postero-superior rotator cuff tears in young and active patients. The tendon of the latissimus dorsi is transferred from its insertion on the bicipital groove to the postero-superior greater tuberosity, allowing the transferred tendon to close the postero-superior rotator cuff defect and act as a humeral head depressor. To avoid excessive tension at the tendon-bone-interface, an allograft patch can be used to extend the harvested tendon. However, as a biofeedback program needs to be initiated postoperatively to achieve good outcomes, patients with limited physical coordination abilities should not be treated with latissimus dorsi tendon transfer. Overall, long-term results have been satisfactory.

Humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligaments (HAGL) is much less common than labral injuries following anterior shoulder dislocation, but this pathology may contribute to recurrent instability. Therefore, surgical repair of these lesions is generally recommended. Due to the inferolateral attachment of the inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) on the humeral neck, the arthroscopic treatment of HAGL lesions is technically challenging and demanding. Advantages of this technique over other arthroscopic and open procedures include better visualization and anatomic fixation of the avulsed IGHL with minimal invasiveness.

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the glenohumeral joint is a frequent and disabling cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction. Joint space narrowing, stiffness, and osteophyte formation are associated with symptomatic OA. When non-operative options have failed, young, active patients may wish to delay arthroplasty. In such patients, the comprehensive arthroscopic management (CAM) procedure may be indicated, and this procedure includes several distinct steps aimed at improving pain and function.

Suprascapular neuropathy can be caused by entrapment of the suprascapular nerve, with the symptoms produced determined by the location of impingement along its course. Neurolysis is considered an effective treatment for this condition to improve function and reduce muscle dysfunction and atrophic change.

In patients with irreparable tears of the subscapularis tendon, the transfer of the pectoralis major tendon is a viable treatment option. The transfer of the upper 2/3 of the pectoralis major tendon to the humeral head is used for irreparable tears of the upper part of the subscapularis tendon and recreates the balance of the shoulder force couple, thus mimicking the natural function of the subscapularis and promoting pain relief. In case of a complete and irreparable rupture of the subscapularis tendon, the pectoralis major transfer can be combined with an additional transfer of the teres major tendon.

Avulsion fractures of the anteroinferior glenoid rim, also known as bony Bankart lesions, are commonly associated with anterior glenohumeral dislocations. Because bone deficiency of the anteroinferior glenoid can contribute to recurrent glenohumeral instability, bony Bankart lesions should be repaired whenever feasible. The Bony Bankart Bridge technique is a reproducible and excellent way of arthroscopically treating these lesions. Advantages of this technique over open procedures include superior visualization, anatomic reduction with fragment compression, and minimal invasiveness.

Acromioclavicular joint injuries are common and are often seen in contact athletes. Good to excellent results have been reported using soft tissue grafts to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligaments; however, complications arising from bone tunnels remain. This chapter describes an anatomic coracoclavicular reconstruction using a large soft tissue graft while minimizing the risk of clavicle fracture by avoiding large bone tunnels.

In patients with irreparable tears of the subscapularis tendon, reconstruction with an allo- or autograft may be a viable therapeutic option. However, the postoperative results of published techniques show varying rates of success. Using a human acellular dermal allograft for an anterior capsule reconstruction (ACR) may offer additional benefits such as superior mechanical strength compared to smaller and thinner tendon allografts used in the past. The implantation of an allograft replaces the torn subscapularis tendon’s role as the anterior joint stabilizer, thus preventing the humeral head from migrating anteriorly by acting as a static restraint. This surgery alters shoulder biomechanics as the graft acts as a static restraint, thereby centering the humeral head during active movement, preventing anterior escape, and thus leading to improved function and pain relief.

The postero-superior rotator cuff is the most common location for full-thickness rotator cuff tears and leads to a significant amount of shoulder pain and disability annually. Advancements in arthroscopy and imaging have permitted improved identification of these tear patterns. Tears may be categorized as crescent, U-shaped, L-shaped, reverse-L-shaped or massive, contracted, immobile tears. The specific tear pattern is important as each pattern has a recommended treatment method based on biomechanical considerations.

Frozen shoulder, caused by capsular fibrotic adhesions, can induce debilitating pain and functional reduction. Arthrolysis is indicated in patients that do not respond to conservative management. A rotator interval and anterior release can be performed initially, followed by a posterior release if the capsule remains tight. Extensive capsulotomy can precipitate instability and should be avoided.

Sternoclavicular (SC) joint pathology may include a spectrum from instability to arthritis. SC joint arthritis may be secondary to repetitive use or may be post-traumatic in origin, and patients may present with pain, crepitus, and swelling. Nonsurgical treatment should be considered and may include activity modification, anti-inflammatories, physical therapy, and possible corticosteroid injection. Patients with persistent pain despite appropriate nonsurgical management may benefit from surgical treatment with resection arthroplasty. This chapter reviews our recommended evaluation as well as our preferred technique for surgical treatment of SC joint arthritis.

Arthritis of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) is commonly identified radiographically although it is often not clinically symptomatic. It may occur in the setting of overuse (as in distal clavicular osteolysis), as a result of injury to the ACJ or as a part of normal aging. For symptomatic ACJ arthritis, treatment is often nonsurgical, although arthroscopic excision of the distal clavicle can be considered in patients with localized pain at the ACJ. This chapter reviews our recommended evaluation as well as our preferred technique for surgical treatment of symptomatic ACJ arthritis.

The indications for arthroscopic shoulder surgery continue to expand. With advancements in surgical technique and surgical technology, more advanced arthroscopic procedures are now being performed routinely. Access to and visualization of the various anatomic structures and compartments of the shoulder joint is paramount to successfully performing shoulder arthroscopy. Proper patient positioning, portal placement, and fluid management aid in adequate exposure, minimizes complications, and facilitates efficiency during shoulder arthroscopy. The purpose of this chapter is to outline the authors’ preferred techniques for patient positioning and portal placement. Additionally visualization of the various anatomic structures will be described through proper fluid management and basic diagnostic arthroscopy techniques.

In cases of massive irreparable supraspinatus tendon or combined supraspinatus / infraspinatus tendon tears, reverse total shoulder replacement can offer good results. However, in young and active patients with these types of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears limited prosthetic implant longevity and activity restrictions for high-impact activities make reverse total shoulder arthroplasty a less desirable option. Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (ASCR) is an alternative technique for this pathology with advantages of minimal invasiveness, better approximation of the native anatomy, and the potential for easier future surgical revisions. The implantation of a graft replaces the torn superior rotator cuff tendon’s role as the superior capsule, thus preventing the humeral head from migrating superiorly by acting as a static restraint. This surgery alters shoulder sbiomechanics as the graft acts as a “checkrein,” re-centering the humeral head during abduction and forward flexion, preventing superior escape, and leading to imporved function and pain relief.

Sternoclavicular (SC) joint pathology is relatively uncommon; however, persistent pain and instability of the SC joint may result despite appropriate initial management and may require surgical treatment with resection arthroplasty and possible ligamentous reconstruction. For the correctly indicated patient, surgical treatment of the SC joint is an appropriate procedure when performed by surgeons with experience operating in this anatomic region.

Management of multidirectional instability (MDI) of the shoulder remains a challenge. The arthroscopic treatment of MDI is used to improve glenohumeral stability, decrease laxity, and repair any damaged labral tissue. Capsular plication can be used to effectively reduce capsular volume incrementally which improves overall glenohumeral stability by deepening the glenoid concavity and reducing capsular laxity. This surgery alters shoulder biomechanics by constraining the capsuloligamentous structures.

Background: Patients are staying active longer and expect to return to sports or continue participating in recreational activities after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of patients to return to recreational sports following TSA. We hypothesized that TSA would allow a high rate of return to recreational sports. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients who underwent primary TSA by a single surgeon and were at least 2 years out from surgery were included and were studied for their ability to return to recreational activity following surgery between December 2005 and January 2015. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained, including the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey–Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE); Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; and satisfaction scores (10-point scale), preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Return-to-sport rates were assessed using a standardized patient-reported outcome questionnaire. Results: A total of 165 patients (186 shoulders) that received TSA met the inclusion criteria for the study. Preoperatively, 139 patients (157 shoulders) were involved in recreational sports; 16 (8.6%) shoulders required additional surgical intervention after the index TSA procedure. A significant postoperative increase was noted in the mean ASES (from 48.3 to 87.0; P < .001), QuickDASH (from 41.0 to 15.8; P < .001), SANE (from 49.1 to 81.2; P < .001), and SF-12 PCS scores (from 38.6 to 48.9; P = .004). Of the 157 shoulders in the recreational sports cohort, responses to the survey examining recreational sporting activities after surgery were available for 112 shoulders. The overall rate of return to sport or recreational activity following TSA was 93.7% (105/112 shoulders). The rate of return to recreational sporting activity equal to or better than the preinjury level was 69.7% (78/112 shoulders), while 6.3% (7/112 shoulders) of our cohort reported that they were unable to compete in recreational sports following TSA. Of the patients who participated in predominantly upper extremity sporting activities after TSA, 49% had to modify their postoperative recreational sporting activity because of lifestyle change, pain, weakness, or decreased range of motion. Conclusion: Patients undergoing TSA showed excellent postoperative improvement in their outcome scores, satisfaction, and return to athletic activities. Despite the expected decrease in activity levels with the slow progression of osteoarthritis over time until TSA was performed, almost 94% of patients successfully returned to various recreational sporting activities postoperatively. This study showed that return to recreational sports can be achieved at participation levels that are comparable with preoperative levels, but athletes in some sports such as tennis or swimming, which require more intense levels of exercise, are less likely to return to the same participation levels.

Background: Septic arthritis (SA) of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a rare but potentially devastating condition. In certain cases, graft removal becomes necessary. Purpose: To evaluate clinical, subjective, and radiologic outcomes of patients with SA after ACLR and assess whether graft retention has superior clinical results as compared with graft removal. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients who were at least 12 months out from arthroscopic treatment of SA after isolated ACLR at our institution were eligible for inclusion. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: group 1, patients with initial graft retention; group 2, patients with initial graft removal. Group 2 was subdivided into 2 groups: group 2a, patients with graft reimplantation; group 2b, patients without graft reimplantation. Objective and subjective assessments were obtained at follow-up, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee examination form, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) score, Lysholm score, and IKDC subjective evaluation. Radiologic assessment was performed with pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Of the 41 patients included, 33 (81%) were available for follow-up at a mean ± SD 54.7 ± 24.4 months at an age of 28.4 ± 9.3 years. When compared with patients from group 2 (n = 12), patients from group 1 (n = 21) obtained significantly better results on the objective IKDC score (normal or nearly normal: group 1, 66.6%; group 2, 36.4%; P = .047) and KT-1000 measurements (group 1, 1.3 ± 1.0 mm; group 2, 2.9 ± 1.5 mm; P = .005). Group 1 also scored better than group 2 on the Lysholm ( P = .007), IKDC subjective ( P = .011), and WOMAC ( P = .069) measures. Between groups 2a (n = 4) and 2b (n = 8), no significant differences in outcomes could be detected ( P values, .307-.705), although patients with anterior cruciate ligament graft reimplantation showed a clear tendency toward better results in objective and not subjective parameters. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation showed higher rates of cartilage damage and meniscal tears among patients with graft resection versus graft retention. Conclusion: Patients with graft retention showed superior postoperative results when compared with patients who underwent initial graft resection, although subanalysis showed comparable outcomes between graft retention and reimplantation. Thus, while graft-retaining protocols should have the highest priority in the treatment of SA after ACLR, graft reimplantation should be performed in cases where graft resection becomes necessary, to avoid future cartilage and meniscal lesions. Finally, further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to gain a better understanding of the outcomes of patients with SA after ACLR.

Objectives: Rotator cuff tears lead to significant morbidity due to pain and decreased function. Despite the prevalence of cuff repairs, mid-term outcomes have been scarcely reported. The purpose of this study is to report minimum 5-year outcomes and clinical survivorship after double-row rotator cuff repair for full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears. Methods: Patients at least five years out from arthroscopic double-row repair for a full-thickness cuff tear involving the supraspinatus tendon were included. Pre- and postoperative ASES, SF-12 PCS, QuickDASH, SANE, and satisfaction scores were collected. The relationship between outcomes and (1) tear chronicity, (2) number of tendons involved, (3) type of repair, and (4) primary versus revision procedure, was also evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted defining failures as progression to revision rotator cuff surgery. Results: From November 2005 to February 2012, a total of 189 shoulders were eligible for inclusion. Fifteen shoulders (7.9%) underwent revision rotator cuff repair and were considered failures. Outcomes data were reported at a mean follow-up of 6.6 (range, 5.0-11.0) years. All outcome scores significantly improved from pre- to postoperative time point, including mean ASES (57.9 to 92.9, P < 0.001), SF-12 PCS (43.4 to 52.0, P < 0.001), QuickDASH (35.2 to 10.5, P < 0.001), and SANE scores (61.5 to 86.5, P < 0.001). Acute tears demonstrated significantly better ASES and SANE scores than chronic tears (ASES 95.1 ± 8.9 versus 91.7 ± 11.2, P = 0.025; SANE 89.6 ± 19.9 versus 85.7 ± 21.3, P = 0.042). No other analyzed variable had a significant association with outcomes scores ( P > 0.05). Survivorship analysis demonstrated a postoperative clinical survivorship of the repair of 96.5% at two years and 93.8% at five years (Figure 1). Conclusion: Patients can expect excellent clinical outcomes and a low failure rate following arthroscopic double-row repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tears at mid-term follow-up. The repair of acute tears and primary repairs were associated with better postoperative outcomes.

The authors of this chapter review the anatomy, classification, indications, imaging, surgical techniques, complications and post-operative rehabilitation of distal clavicle fractures. Advanced arthroscopic techniques and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) are discussed for high-risk young athletes.

Recurrent instability is a frequent complication following arthroscopic Bankart repair. The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors for poor patient-reported clinical outcome scores and failure rates.Patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair at least 2 years earlier were included. Preoperative and postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; and satisfaction scores were collected. The relationship of the following factors with outcomes and failure rates was assessed: (1) previous arthroscopic stabilization, (2) 3 or more dislocations prior to surgery, (3) glenoid labral articular disruption (GLAD) lesion, (4) concurrent superior labral anterior-to-posterior tear repair, and (5) concurrent biceps tenodesis.The study included 72 patients with a median age of 23 years (range, 14-49 years). Subsequent revision was required in 9 (12.5%); 1 additional patient (1.4%) had recurrent dislocation. Outcome data were available at a median follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-9 years). All scores significantly improved from preoperatively to postoperatively (P .05); the mean patient satisfaction score was 9, with a median of 10 (range, 1-10). None of the analyzed factors were associated with worse postoperative outcome scores. GLAD lesions were significantly associated with a higher rate of failure (P = .007). No other analyzed factors had a significant association with failure rates (P .05).Patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anteroinferior shoulder instability had excellent outcomes, even in the context of previous arthroscopic stabilization surgery, 3 or more dislocations prior to surgery, concurrent superior labral anterior-to-posterior tear repair, or concurrent biceps tenodesis. However, GLAD lesions were associated with higher rates of failure, and the presence of a GLAD lesion may herald the presence of changes in the articular version or other as-yet-undetermined factors that could predispose patients to failure.

Humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) is a lesion associated with anterior shoulder instability. Although uncommon, HAGL lesions are a significant contributor to shoulder pain and dysfunction and, if missed, can even be a cause of failed Bankart repair. HAGL lesions should generally be repaired surgically; however, given their low prevalence, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical approach. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our preferred surgical technique for the fixation of an HAGL lesion using an all-arthroscopic approach and a knotless suture anchor construct.

Initial treatment of shoulder multidirectional instability (MDI) consists of nonoperative modalities of physical therapy and rehabilitation; if this fails, surgical treatment can become necessary. MDI of the shoulder can be challenging to manage in individuals who fail conservative management. Historically, surgical treatment for MDI has been open capsular plication; however, arthroscopic capsular plication has now become the standard of care, with outcomes similar to the open procedure. The purpose of this article and Video 1 is to describe our arthroscopic technique for pancapsular shift with labral repair.