Introduction The optimal management of advanced heart failure patients partially depends on the shared care between community HF units (i.e., primary care and general cardiologists), specialized HF units (i.e., interventional cardiology), and tertiary hubs of advanced HF care (i.e., mechanical circulatory support and transplant). Currently, we lack a methodology to uncover the underlying areas of shared care. In this sense, we started to unveiling the underlying shared care areas in California using network science and large-scale data sets. Methods We modeled the shared care network using 37,324,861 discharges from 478 General Acute Care Hospitals to 2,709 patient home Zip Codes in California between 2016 and 2017. In the shared care network, nodes are Zip codes and links between two Zip Codes are given by the sum of the individual contribution of each facility, which is the product between the total number of discharges of that facility, the proportion of its discharges to both Zip Codes. Finally, Shared Care Areas (SCA) were extracted by applying a community detection algorithm called Infomap. For each SCA, we calculated the percentiles (25th, 50th, and 95th) for the population size using the Census data, the rate of heart transplants per 100,000 using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) as well as the rate of combinations of HF prescriptions per 100,000 involving specific Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, Beta-blockers (BB), Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA), and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) using Medicare Advantage Part D claims. Results We uncovered 44 SCAs as shown in the Figure. The population size (172,078, and 436,609, and 2,881,420), the rates of heart transplants (9, 10 and 19), as well as the rates of ARNI+BB+MRA (0, .26, and 1.29), ACE+ARB+BB (236, 276, and 449), ACE+MRA (100, 128, and 266), ARB+BB (773, 1034, and 1830), ACE+ARB (626, 780, and 1390) and ACE+BB (1108, 1267, and 1949) significantly varied among SCAs. Conclusions In the era where models of shared care are necessary for the optimal management of advanced heart failure patients, we still lack an automated methodology to unveil these areas. Here, we attempted to establish the foundations of how SCA can be uncovered using network science and large-scale data sets of patient discharges, census, heart transplantations, and prescription claims.