Search

For three years, COVID-19 has circulated among our communities and around the world, fundamentally changing social interactions, health care systems, and service delivery. For people living with (and receiving treatment for) cancer, pandemic conditions presented significant additional hurdles in an already unstable and shifting environment, including disrupted personal contact with care providers, interrupted access to clinical trials, distanced therapeutic encounters, multiple immune vulnerabilities, and new forms of financial precarity. In a 2020 perspective in this journal, we examined how COVID-19 was reshaping cancer care in the early stages of the pandemic and how these changes might endure into the future. Three years later, and in light of a series of interviews with patients and their caregivers from the United States and Australia conducted during the pandemic, we return to consider the potential legacy effects of the pandemic on cancer care. While some challenges to care provision and survivorship were unforeseen, others accentuated and amplified existing problems experienced by patients, caregivers, and health care providers. Both are likely to have enduring effects in the “post-pandemic” world, raising the importance of focusing on lessons that can be learned for the future.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threating condition that is common in patients with adult-type diffuse gliomas, yet thromboprophylaxis is controversial because of possible intracerebral hemorrhage. Effective VTE prediction models exist for other cancers, but not glioma. Our objective was to develop a VTE prediction tool to improve glioma patient care, incorporating clinical, blood-based, histologic, and molecular markers. We analyzed preoperative arterial blood, tumor tissue, and clinical-pathologic data (including next-generation sequencing data) from 258 patients with newly diagnosed World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2 to 4 adult-type diffuse gliomas. Forty-six (17.8%) experienced VTE. Tumor expression of tissue factor (TF) and podoplanin (PDPN) each positively correlated with VTE, although only circulating TF and D-dimers, not circulating PDPN, correlated with VTE risk. Gliomas with mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) or IDH2 (IDHmut) caused fewer VTEs; multivariable analysis suggested that this is due to IDHmut suppression of TF, not PDPN. In a predictive time-to-event model, the following predicted increased VTE risk in newly diagnosed patients with glioma: (1) history of VTE; (2) hypertension; (3) asthma; (4) white blood cell count; (5) WHO tumor grade; (6) patient age; and (7) body mass index. Conversely, IDHmut, hypothyroidism, and MGMT promoter methylation predicted reduced VTE risk. These 10 variables were used to create a web-based VTE prediction tool that was validated in 2 separate cohorts of patients with adult-type diffuse glioma from other institutions. This study extends our understanding of the VTE landscape in these tumors and provides evidence-based guidance for clinicians to mitigate VTE risk in patients with glioma.

BACKGROUND COVID-19 radically changed neuro-oncology care. In this retrospective study, we examine the impact of COVID-19 infection on neuro-oncological care and clinical outcomes in two geographically separate populations. METHODS Descriptive statistics compared demographic and clinical history extracted from the medical records of COVID-19 positive patients with primary brain tumors treated between 3/1/2020 and 3/31/2021. All subjects were unvaccinated given our cohort pre-dates the ubiquitous availability of vaccines. Patients were treated at Washington University (WashU) in St. Louis, MO and Duke University in Durham, NC. Each site’s respective institutional review board approved the study, with a data transfer agreement in place. RESULTS We identified 62 total (WashU=13; Duke=49) subjects with positive COVID-19 infection. Patients were predominantly white (85.5%), male (56.5%), with KPS >=70 (82.3%) and never smoked (69.4%). WashU patients tended to be older with grade 4 tumors, but this was not significant. At the time of COVID infection 35.5% of patients were receiving cancer-directed therapy. Notably, 37.1% experienced delayed care due to a COVID-19 diagnosis, most often for scheduled systemic treatment or radiation treatment. A further 37.1% had an ER visit, hospitalization, or ICU stay attributed to COVID-19. Of the 17 patients who died during the study period, 4 deaths were attributed directly to COVID-19 and not to their underlying brain tumor or other cause. Finally, telehealth use differed between sites (84.6% at WashU vs 14.3% at Duke). However, this difference could not be attributed to patient age, performance status, or distance from treating institution. CONCLUSION COVID-19 infection led to treatment delays and death for a subset, but not the majority of neuro-oncology patients. Telehealth use varied between sites and was not associated with commonly held assumptions about patient distance or performance status, suggesting evolving practice norms following telehealth’s introduction. Study limitations include a small sample size

INTRODUCTION Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a challenging complication of high grade glioma (HGG) and critical questions remain unanswered regarding clinicopathologic risk factors, molecular associations, and optimal treatment. METHODS Patients with molecularly-profiled HGG (Caris Life Sciences; Phoenix, AZ) with LMD at two institutions were included. Medical records were reviewed for clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, and outcome. Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient survival were performed on censored data using Cox’s proportional hazard model. RESULTS 43 patients (male: 33, female: 10; median age: 56 years) were identified, comprising 41 grade 4 (glioblastoma: 38; gliosarcoma: 2; H3K27M diffuse midline glioma: 1) and 2 grade 3 tumors (astrocytoma: 1; pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma: 1). LMD diagnosed at HGG diagnosis (n=18) versus recurrence (n=22) was associated with longer post-LMD survival [pLMD-OS: 15.3m vs. 4.8m, HR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02-0.29, p=0.0004] but similar overall survival [mOS: 15.3m vs. 12.3m; HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.36-1.85; p=0.63]. Pathology-diagnosed LMD (n=15) versus MRI-diagnosed LMD (n=26) was associated with longer post-LMD survival [pLMD-OS: 15.4m vs. 5.2m, HR: 14.9, 95% CI: 0.01-0.30, p=0.0004] but similar overall survival [mOS: 17.1m vs. 12.3m; HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.3-1.58; p=0.38]. Post-LMD survival was significantly prolonged for supratentorial (n=28) versus infratentorial/spinal (n=4) locations regardless of the diagnostic modality [pLMD-OS: 2.6m vs. 11.3m, HR: 14.4, 95% CI: 2.73-75.7, p=0.0017], and did not significantly differ between symptomatic (n=20) and asymptomatic (n=23) patients [pLMD-OS: 4.8m vs. 11.2m, HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 0.82-3.77, p=0.15). pTERT mutation (81%), EGFR amplification (43%), and MGMT methylation (33%) were prevalent but IDH1 mutation was rare (2.8%). Comparison with a separate glioblastoma cohort (n=1400) suggested more frequent amplification of CHIC2, MDM4, and KDR, higher mutation rates of RUNX1, APC, and RAD51C, colder tumor microenvironment (TME), and lower expression of immune checkpoint-related genes. CONCLUSIONS Clinicopathological characteristics affect post-LMD survival, and cohort comparison suggests molecular and TME differences in LMD-HGG tumors.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common paraneoplastic complication in patients with adult-type diffuse gliomas. VTE greatly diminishes quality-of-life, and can even be life-threatening. While effective VTE prediction models exist for other cancers, those models do not work for gliomas. Thus, there are no standard guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in glioma patients. To address this deficiency, arterial blood, tumor tissue, and comprehensive clinical-pathologic data (including next generation sequencing) were obtained from 258 newly diagnosed WHO grade 2-4 adult-type diffuse glioma patients at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. Forty-six out of 258 grade 2-4 glioma patients (17.8%) experienced a subsequent VTE. Intratumoral expression of two proteins that have been associated with VTE risk in other cancers, thromboplastin and podoplanin, was higher in IDH wild-type than IDH mutant gliomas. Tissue expression of both markers was associated with increased VTE risk, but in the circulation, only thromboplastin positively correlated with VTE. LASSO time-to-event analysis showed that older patient age, elevated body mass index, elevated WBC count, hypertension, a preoperative history of VTE, asthma, and higher WHO grade predicted increased postoperative VTE risk, whereas hypothyroidism, IDH mutation, and MGMT promoter methylation were negative risk factors. Together, these 10 variables generated a receiver operating characteristic curve for 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from original surgery resulting in estimated AUC value of 0.82 in the Northwestern discovery cohort, 0.72 in the UCLA validation cohort (N=68), and 0.68 in the Duke validation cohort (N=157). We created an online prediction tool based on this model, which estimates VTE risk up to 1 year from original surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first externally validated VTE risk prediction tool designed specifically for adult-type diffuse glioma patients. This tool, based on readily obtainable information, provides treating physicians with more objective risk estimates on which to base thromboprophylaxis decision-making.

Background Spirituality can impact patients’ attitudes and decisions about treatment and end-of-life care when coping with cancer. Previous studies documented health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and spiritual well-being (SWB) as positively correlated within a general cancer patient population, but little is known about their association in the primary brain tumor population. We sought to measure SWB in primary brain tumor patients and evaluate whether it was associated with HRQoL. Methods Six-hundred and six patients treated at The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke between December 16, 2013 and February 28, 2014 with data in the PRoGREss registry are included in this retrospective analysis. Each patient completed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 (FACIT-Sp-12) and -Fatigue (FACIT-F), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and -Brain (FACT-G and FACT-Br). Results Mean age was 49.1 years (SD = 13.5 years), male (N = 328, 54.1%), married (N = 404, 66.7%), at least college-educated (N = 381, 62.9%), and diagnosed with a high-grade glioma (N = 412, 68.0%). Multiple regression analyses were performed on both the FACT-G and the FACT-Br using the FACIT-Sp-12 sub-scales of Meaning/Peace and Faith, FACIT-F, belief in God or a higher power, prayer, gender, tumor grade, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) as predictors. We found that greater SWB (measured by FACIT-Sp-12) was associated with better HRQoL (measured by FACT-G and FACT-Br; p < .0001). Conclusion The association between reported SWB and reported improved HRQoL emphasizes the importance of spirituality in primary brain tumor patients, suggesting SWB must be considered in strategies to improve HRQoL.

Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, is an incurable disease that has an inevitable tendency to recur following standard of care surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide chemotherapy. There is an urgent need for improved medical therapies. The topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan has been investigated and used in the treatment of GBM for over 20 years. Clinical trials investigating irinotecan as monotherapy and in combination with temozolomide and bevacizumab have failed to show an overall survival benefit for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Consequently, irinotecan is not commonly recommended for GBM treatment. However, these trials were conducted prior to the advent of molecularly-guided GBM subtyping, which is now a cornerstone of glioma diagnostics according to the updated WHO 2021 classification. To understand the extent to which molecularly-defined glioma subgroups differentially respond to clinically relevant therapies, we investigated the sensitivity of GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) against a panel of chemotherapeutic agents, including temozolomide, bevacizumab, and irinotecan. All GBM PDXs (n=9) were responsive to irinotecan when grown as subcutaneous tumors. Two PDX lines exhibited hypersensitivity to irinotecan, which was marked by treatment-induced regression of subcutaneous tumors and increased median survival of 61 and 90+ days. Molecular analyses revealed that these hypersensitive lines were both ATRX-deficient tumors that displayed the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) phenotype, while the less sensitive lines were all ATRX-intact and demonstrated TERT activation. One of the hypersensitive lines was IDH1R132H/WT while the other was IDH1R132H/− (historically termed secondary GBM; grade 4 astrocytoma per 2021 WHO classification). Cell-based studies showed that irinotecan sensitivity did not correlate with D-2HG producing capacity of the cells and was not impacted by inhibition of the mutant IDH1 enzyme. Irinotecan treatment significantly prolonged survival of orthotopic ALT+ PDXs relative to a vehicle control (64 days versus 41.5 days median survival). These results suggest that ALT+ gliomas may be particularly sensitive to topoisomerase inhibitor therapy. Our study highlights the need to interpret glioma clinical trial results in light of key molecular biomarkers, including indicators of ALT activity (e.g. ATRX deficiency, ultrabright telomeric foci, and C-circles). In addition, our results suggest that ALT-related biomarkers may be useful for identifying glioma patients who may benefit from topoisomerase inhibitor therapy. Citation Format: Stephen T. Keir, Heng Liu, Justin T. Low, Christopher J. Pirozzi, Nathan Reynolds, Eric S. Lipp, Annick Desjardins, Henry S. Friedman, Mustafa Khasraw, Darell D. Bigner, David M. Ashley, Matthew S. Waitkus. Alternative lengthening of telomeres is associated with hypersensitivity to topoisomerase 1 inhibition in glioblastoma xenograft models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4924.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a subtype of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma that involves the brain, spinal cord, or leptomeninges, without evidence of systemic disease. This rare disease accounts for ~ 3% of all primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Methotrexate-based regimens are the standard of care for this disease with overall survival rates ranging from 14 to 55 months. Relapse after apparent complete remission can occur. We sought to understand the outcomes of patients who relapsed. This is an IRB-approved investigation of patients treated at our institution between 12/31/2004 and 10/12/2016. We retrospectively identified all cases of PCNSL as part of a database registry and evaluated these cases for demographic information, absence or presence of relapse, location of relapse, treatment regimens, and median relapse-free survival. This analysis identified 44 patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL. Mean age at diagnosis was 63.1 years (range 20–86, SD = 13.2 years). Of the 44 patients, 28 patients successfully completed an initial treatment regimen without recurrence or toxicity that required a change in therapy. Relapse occurred in 11 patients with the location of relapse being in the CNS only (n = 5), vitreous fluid only (n = 1), outside CNS only (n = 3), or a combination of CNS and outside of the CNS (n = 2). Sites of relapse outside of the CNS included testes (n = 1), lung (n = 1), adrenal gland (n = 1), kidney/adrenal gland (n = 1), and retroperitoneum (n = 1). Median relapse-free survival after successful completion of therapy was 6.7 years (95% CI 1.1, 12.6). After successful initial treatment, PCNSL has a propensity to relapse, and this relapse can occur both inside and outside of the CNS. Vigilant monitoring of off-treatment patients with a history of PCNSL is necessary to guide early diagnosis of relapse and to initiate aggressive treatment.

New precision medicine therapies are urgently required for glioblastoma (GBM). However, to date, efforts to subtype patients based on molecular profiles, have failed to direct treatment strategies. We hypothesized that interrogation of the GBM tumor microenvironment (TME) and identification of novel TME-specific subtypes could inform new precision treatment strategies. To this end, a refined and validated microenvironment cell population (MCP)-counter method was applied to > 800 GBM patient tumours and validated by multiplex-immunohistochemistry. The MCP-counter deconvolution method interrogates the TME composition from transcriptomic data. Using this refined method, we classified the GLIOTRAIN(www.gliotrain.eu) IDHwt GBM cohort (n=123) into 3 novel clusters characterised by differences in TME composition and subsequently validated findings in the TCGA (n=69), CGGA (n=72) and DUKE (unpublished)(n=162) cohorts. TMEHigh tumours (30%) displayed elevated immune populations, functional orientation markers, immune checkpoint genes, and upregulated immunoregulatory pathways. Moreover, tertiary lymphoid structures were a feature of TMEHigh/mesenchymal+ patients. TMEMed (46%) tumours displayed heterogeneous immune populations and upregulated neuronal signalling pathways. TMELow (24%) tumours represented an ‘immune-desert’ group, high EGFR mutation frequency and upregulated EGFR signalling pathways. Longitudinal analysis of the GLASS cohort revealed TME-subtype transitions upon recurrence, influenced by TME composition changes. Finally, assessment of three GBM immunotherapy clinical trial cohorts revealed that TMEHigh patients treated with neo-adjuvant anti-PD1 have a significantly improved survival (P=0.04). Moreover, TMEHigh patients treated with anti-PD1 and an oncolytic virus (PVSRIPO) in the adjuvant setting, showed a trend towards improved survival (P=0.15 and P=0.056 respectively). Overall, we have established a novel TME-based classification system for application in intracranial malignancies. This system may be used to better inform a precision targeting approach in the brain tumour setting. For example, we hypothesise that patients bearing TMELow tumours may be amenable to neoadjuvant anti-TIM3 + EGFR inhibitor, TMEMed to anti-angiogenic immunotherapy, and TMEHigh patients to neoadjuvant anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4.

BACKGROUND D2C7-IT, a novel immunotoxin-based cytotoxic therapy, targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mutant EGFR variant III. In preclinical studies, D2C7-IT kills tumor cells and prolongs survival, but is unable to generate cures in all animals. We hypothesized that immunosuppression in glioblastoma limits D2C7-IT efficacy. Eliminating glioblastoma immunosuppression via CD40 co-stimulation is anticipated to enhance D2C7-IT-induced antitumor responses. In murine glioma models, CED of D2C7-IT+αCD40 generated cures and long-term tumor-specific adaptive immunity. Hence, we are conducting a phase 1 trial of D2C7-IT+2141-V11 (αhuman-CD40) administered via CED in rMG patients. METHODS Eligibility includes adult patients with solitary supratentorial rMG (WHO grade 3/4); ≥ 4 weeks after chemotherapy, bevacizumab, or study drug; adequate organ function; and KPS ≥ 70%. Cohorts of 3 patients are treated with increasing doses of 2141-V11 to determine the maximum tolerated dose when administered sequentially following D2C7-IT (166,075 ng) via CED at 0.5 mL/hr. Five dose levels (DLs) are evaluated (2141-V11 at: #1: 0.70 mg; #2: 2.0 mg; #2**: 3.0 mg #2*: 4.0 mg; #3: 7.0 mg). RESULTS As of May 29, 2022, 13 patients were treated (3 patients on DL1, DL2, and DL2**; 2 patients on DL3 and DL2*). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed; however, lower DLs were added due to higher frequency of adverse events (AEs) expected with D2C7-IT+2141-V11 with DL3 and DL2* (fever, neurologic symptoms). All patients remain alive 0.7-10.6 months after therapy. Grade ≥ 2 AEs due to D2C7-IT+2141-V11 include: headache (grade 3, n = 1; grade 2, n = 4); pyramidal tract disorder (grade 3, n = 1; grade 2, n = 2); paresthesia (grade 3, n = 1); dysphasia (grade 3, n = 1); seizures (grade 2; n = 2); fever (grade 2; n = 2); and one each of grade 2 depressed level of consciousness, fatigue, and concentration impairment. Enrollment is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS Intratumoral administration of D2C7-IT+2141-V11 via CED is safe, encouraging efficacy results are observed.

Oligodendroglioma is a subtype of diffuse glioma defined by a mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes and a co-deletion of chromosome arms 1p and 19q. These tumors primarily occur in adult patients in their third and fourth decade of life and are universally fatal due to an inevitable recurrence that follows a treatment regimen of surgical resection and an optional combination of alkylating chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. While initially slow growing, recurrent tumors exhibit increasingly aggressive phenotypes that become progressively more difficult to treat with conventional therapy. Currently, the molecular mechanisms and cellular phenotypes that drive this recurrence remain unknown. To understand these factors, we assembled a cohort of matched initial and recurrent oligodendroglioma samples from over 100 patients and performed whole-genome sequencing and whole-exome sequencing on each of them. To link these molecular profiles to cell state changes, we additionally performed bulk and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing on a subset of these tumor pairs. In nearly 40% of alkylating chemotherapy-treated patients, recurrent tumors presented with hypermutation that corresponded with an increase in neoplastic cell proliferation. Additionally, while individual somatic alterations specific to recurrence were relatively rare, we observed a subset of tumors that acquired deletions in the cell cycle regulator CDKN2A following treatment with radiotherapy. Acquisition of either of these features associated with shorter patient survival and higher grade at recurrence, implicating cell cycle dysregulation as a mechanism of treatment resistance and increased tumor severity. Together, these results indicate that oligodendrogliomas evolve in a treatment-specific manner following chemo- and radiation therapy and highlight key pathways that can be targeted to delay the onset of recurrence.

BACKGROUND Nausea and vomiting remain the most feared cancer treatment-related side effects. Trials establishing antiemetic guidelines exclude malignant glioma (MG) patients. In MG patients receiving radiation with concurrent temozolomide, chemoradiation-induced nausea and vomiting (cRINV) rates are 35 and 26%, respectively, which reduce quality of life, treatment adherence, and potentially cancer control.OBJECTIVES: In a randomized phase II open label trial, we compared patient satisfaction and efficacy of ondansetron monotherapy (short-acting 5HT3-RA; 3h half-life) vs. rolapitant (long-acting NK1-RA; 180h half-life) plus ondansetron in preventing cRINV during 6-weeks of daily temozolomide (75 mg/m2/dX42d) with radiation. METHODS Fifty-three eligible patients receiving chemoradiation were randomized to Arm-A (ondansetron 8mg Days 1-42, rolapitant 180mg on Day 21) or Arm-B (rolapitant on Day 1 plus daily ondansetron). Primary endpoint included the percentage achieving cRINV-complete response (CR; no vomiting or antiemetic rescue) during the first 2-weeks of radiation. Secondary endpoints included cRIN/cRIV rates, preference for rolapitant plus ondansetron, and toxicity. RESULTS Forty-eight initiated protocol treatment. Mean age=53, 58% male, median KPS 90%, 71% low alcohol N/V risk factor, 73% glioblastoma. During the first 2-weeks of radiation, cRINV-CR was 60% for 25 evaluable patients receiving ondansetron monotherapy and 65% for 23 receiving rolapitant/ondansetron (p< 0.71). Patient-reported cRINV-CR was 61% and 74%, respectively (p< 0.41); cRIN rates (44% Arm-A; 53% Arm-B) were more than cRIV rates (28% Arm-A; 11% Arm-B). More patients receiving ondansetron alone vomited the first 2-weeks (22%) than with rolapitant/ondansetron (0%); p< 0.05. Among 32 patients who completed the study, patients preferred ondansetron (63%) over rolapitant/ondansetron (19%); p< 0.0039; 19% had no preference. Adverse events attributable to antiemetic treatment (fatigue/constipation) were all grade 1-2. CONCLUSIONS While patients prefer ondansetron monotherapy, there was no difference in cRINV-CR between the first 2-week treatments and some had less vomiting with rolapitant plus ondansetron. We will present overall N/V results.

Background Outpatient clinics treating neuro-oncology patients are becoming more multidisciplinary. Utilization of all team members is critical for the holistic care of these complex patients. Specifically, the role of clinical pharmacist (CP) in the ambulatory clinic remains undefined and will likely evolve as more therapeutics are developed for CNS malignancies. We queried the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) membership about the availability of a CP in their ambulatory setting and, if present, the role of that CP. Methods In an IRB-exempt study, we surveyed the SNO community and analyzed responses to queries about CPs in the ambulatory setting. Results Of the 65 SNO members who responded, 52 were clinical members. Of these 52 clinicians, the majority were physicians (88.5%, n = 46). Of these physicians, most were in academic practices (93.5%, n = 43). Over half of the 52 clinical respondents (51.9%, n = 27) reported that they saw ≥30 primary brain tumor patients per month, thus typifying busy clinics. Despite having busy clinics, only 12 (28.6%) of 42 providers with access to a CP reported that their CP was solely dedicated to neuro-oncology patients. For the respondents who had access to a CP, only ~two-thirds of those CPs had direct patient interaction. The top 3 roles of the CP included medication review, chemotherapy dosing/modifications, and practice guideline development; none of which involve direct patient interaction. Conclusions We found that while our surveyed population of SNO clinical members have demanding outpatient practices, most do not have the support or expertise of dedicated neuro-oncology CPs.

Purpose: To describe our population of primary brain tumor (PBT) patients, a subgroup of cancer patients whose intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes are understudied. Methods: Retrospective analysis of PBT patients admitted to an ICU between 2013 to 2018 for an unplanned need. Using descriptive analyses, we characterized our population and their outcomes. Results: Fifty-nine PBT patients were analyzed. ICU mortality was 19% (11/59). The most common indication for admission was seizures (n = 16, 27%). Conclusion: Our ICU mortality of PBT patients was comparable to other solid tumor patients and the general ICU population and better than patients with hematological malignancies. Further study of a larger population would inform guidelines for triaging PBT patients who would most benefit from ICU-level care., Lay abstract Purpose: Data are lacking regarding outcomes of patients with primary brain tumors (PBTs) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), which may it difficult for ICU providers to know who of these patients will best benefit from ICU-level care. We aimed to describe our patient population to contribute to the limited data. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of critically ill PBT patients in our ICU. Results: Of 59 patients analyzed, ICU mortality was 19% (11/59), and the most common indication for admission was seizures (n = 16, 27%). Conclusion: Our ICU mortality of PBT patients was comparable to other solid tumor patients and the general ICU population and better than patients with hematological malignancies.

CINV remains a distressing side effect experienced by glioma patients receiving multi-day temozolomide therapy, in spite of guideline-based antiemetic therapy with selective serotonin-receptor-antagonists. Antiemetic research with aprepitant has routinely excluded glioma patients. In this randomized open-label phase II study, use of a nonstandard 5-day regimen of aprepitant for glioma patients was investigated. One hundred thirty-six glioma patients receiving their first cycle of adjuvant temozolomide (150–200 mg/m2/day × 5 days every 28 days) were randomized to Arm-A (ondansetron 8 mg days 1–5 with aprepitant day 1: 125 mg, days 2–5: 80 mg) or Arm-B (ondansetron). Randomization was stratified by tumor grade and number of prior chemotherapy regimens. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving complete control (CC), defined as no emetic episode or antiemetic rescue medication over the 7-day study period. Secondary endpoints included CINV efficacy in the acute phase (≤ 24 h) and delayed phase (days 2–7), as well as safety and quality of life (QoL). Patients were 61% male, 97% white, 48% with KPS > 90%, 60% non-smokers, mean age 54, 92% with low alcohol use, and 46% with a CINV history. The CC was 58.6% (Arm-A) and 54.5% (Arm-B). Acute-complete response (CR) rates, defined as CC on day 1 in Arm-A and -B, were 97.1% and 87.9%, respectively (p = 0.056). Treatment-related toxicities were mild or moderate in severity. Aprepitant plus ondansetron may increase acute-CR, may have benefit regarding CINV’s effect on QoL, and is safe for 5-day temozolomide compared to ondansetron. This study provides no evidence that aprepitant increases CC rate over ondansetron alone.

Background and purpose Little is known about complementary and integrative health intervention usage in the primary brain tumor population. We aimed to identify the percentage of patients using these practices and explore the impact on quality of life. Materials and methods Clinical records from patients seen in clinic between December 16, 2013 and February 28, 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. The questionnaires used were a modified version of the International Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Brain Cancer and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Fatigue. Results 76% of patients utilized a complementary and integrative health modality. The most frequently reported modalities used were vitamins, massage, and spiritual healing, prayer, diet and meditation. Conclusion These results confirm the usage of complementary and integrative health practices within the primary brain tumor population; however, there was no evidence of association between use and quality of life.

Glioblastoma (GBM) patients can use tumor-treating fields (TTFs) with adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) to treat their disease. TTFs involve wearing transfixed transducers to the shaved scalp, and the transducers are wired to a battery pack that is either fixed or carried (weighing 2.7 pounds). EF-14 clinical trial did evaluate health-related quality of life with standardized patient-report outcome measures but did not measure exercise behavior. We sought to evaluate the exercise behavior of GBM patients using TTFs. We consented GBM patients who intended to use TTFs with adjuvant TMZ after completion of chemoradiation. After informed consent and before starting TTFs, patients completed a self-administered questionnaire, Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire, to assess exercise behavior/physical function. To calculate our primary outcome of total exercise behavior, the frequency of exercise sessions per week within each intensity category was multiplied by the average reported duration, weighted by an estimate of the MET, summed across all intensities, and expressed as average MET-hr/wk. Prior work has defined that physical function can be compared as < 9 MET-h/wk vs. ≥ 9 MET-h/wk. We evaluated at baseline and up to 24-week exercise behavior in patients with TTFs vs. historical controls not using TTFs. We enrolled 19 total GBM patients, with 14 proceeding to use TTFs. Of the 14 patients on TTFs, seven patients (50%) completed ≥ 9 MET-h/wk of exercise, and this level was maintained 8, 16, and 24 weeks after starting TTFs. Six months after the completion of chemoradiation, mean MET-h/wk was decreased in the TTFs group (n=6) (10.71 sd=7.06) vs. historical controls (n=38) (27.35 sd=46.94). TTFs did not interfere with exercise behavior in our GBM cohort, but when compared to GBM patients not utilizing TTFs, there could be a long-term impact on exercise behavior. More research is needed to evaluate exercise behavior in GBM patients using TTFs.

BACKGROUND PVSRIPO is a live-attenuated recombinant rhino:poliovirus that mediates antitumor efficacy by engaging antitumor immunity. A subset (~20%) of patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM) survive >24 months after therapy. We previously reported that low tumor mutation burden (TMB) is associated with longer survival after PVSRIPO and immune checkpoint blockade therapy in rGBM, and that low TMB associates with higher inflammatory gene expression signatures in rGBM tumors. METHODS Clinical features were tested for association with survival after PVSRIPO therapy. Whole exome sequencing and RNA-sequencing of tumors were used to correlate mutational landscape, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and gene expression signatures of patient tumors with survival. An in vitro assay that measures inflammatory responses of patient PBMCs to PVSRIPO was performed. An independent cohort of paired primary and recurrent GBM tumors was used to assess longitudinal changes in TMB and gene expression signatures after standard of care treatment. RESULTS A short time to recurrence and low TMB associated with longer survival after PVSRIPO therapy; these features were not prognostic for longer survival in immunotherapy naïve rGBM cohorts. Unexpectedly, higher pre-treatment polio neutralizing antibody titers were also associated with longer survival after PVSRIPO therapy in two independent clinical cohorts. PBMCs from patients surviving longer after PVSRIPO therapy mounted higher TNF, but lower IFN-a responses after in vitro challenge with PVSRIPO. In analysis of paired primary vs recurrent GBM tumors, we discovered that patients with low TMB upon recurrence were more likely to experience increased tumor inflammation and suppression of overall TMB. Low TMB in rGBM tumors was also associated with neoantigen depletion. Collectively, these observations imply that patients with low TMB and/or shorter duration of standard of care therapy may have intact immune surveillance, and that pre-treatment immunological status may dictate survival response to polio virotherapy.

e14015 Background: D2C7 immunotoxin (D2C7-IT) is a dual-specific recombinant immunotoxin comprising an EGFR wild-type and mutant-specific (EGFRvIII) monoclonal antibody (Ab) fragment and a genetically engineered form of the Pseudomonas exotoxin. When injected directly into the tumor by convection enhanced delivery (CED), immunotoxins induce both direct tumor killing and secondary immune responses by activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are the most prominent glioma-infiltrating immune cells and constitute up to 40% of the tumor mass. Upon binding of D2C7-IT to EGFR and cellular internalization, the Pseudomonas exotoxin moiety of the D2C7-IT kills residual GBM cells, upregulates proinflammatory CD40, and induces pattern recognition receptor pathway transcriptome expression. This potentially creates a proinflammatory glioma microenvironment where TAM activation may be further stimulated by sequential CED of 2141-V11, an Fc engineered anti-human CD40 agonist antibody developed at Rockefeller University. We are conducting a first in human trial of the combination of D2C7-IT + 2141-V11 administered via CED in recurrent MG patients. Methods: Eligibility includes adult patients with recurrence of a solitary supratentorial WHO grade 3 or 4 MG; ≥ 4 weeks after chemotherapy, bevacizumab or study drug; adequate organ function; and KPS ≥ 70%. Cohorts of 3 patients are treated with increasing levels of 2141-V11 to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the compound administered intratumorally in conjunction with D2C7-IT. Dose escalation and de-escalation are managed using a modified Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design to identify the MTD. Intratumoral administration of D2C7-IT via CED (4612 ng/mL over 72 hours) is followed by a 7-hour infusion of 2141-V11, both infused at 0.5 mL/hr. 2141-V11 is dose-escalated to determine the MTD when combined with D2C7-IT. Four dose levels (DL) are planned: #1: 0.70 mg; #2: 2.0 mg; #3: 7.0 mg; #4: 21.0 mg. Results: As of February 7, 2022, three patients were treated at DL1 and DL2, and two patients at DL3. No DLTs have been observed, and all eight patients remain alive and in observation on study after 7.0, 6.5, 6.0, 4.4, 2.8, 2.4, 0.9 and 0.5 months. Early signs of tumor response have been observed, with one patient at DL1 and 2 patients at DL2 without radiographic evidence of active tumor. Grade 2 or higher AEs due to D2C7-IT and/or 2141-V11 include: headache (grade 3, n = 1; grade 2, n = 2); paresthesia (grade 3, n = 1; grade 2, n = 1); dysphasia (grade 3, n = 1); pyramidal tract disorder (grade 3, n = 1; grade 2, n = 1); and depressed level of consciousness (grade 2, n = 1). Enrollment is ongoing. Conclusions: Intratumoral administration of D2C7-IT + 2141-V11 via CED is safe, and encouraging efficacy results have been observed. Clinical trial information: NCT04547777.

Objective To explain several biomarkers used in primary adult brain tumor diagnosis and the methodologies for their application. Data Sources Peer-reviewed literature. Conclusion In the past few years, several biomarkers have been touted as providing reliable and objective assays of histogenesis, prognosis, and therapeutic sensitivity. A number of these markers have failed the test of time and rigorous practice applications. More recently, assays with diagnostic applications have been reported and validated from multiple laboratories using large numbers of patients in routine clinical practices. Implications for Nursing Practice This article provides a reference for biomarker tests for gliomas. There is a greater need for nurses to understand the translational interface between basic science and clinical medicine to determine the applications of these biomarkers for the best interests of their patients.

Purpose: At diagnosis and throughout the disease course, patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) experience a diminished quality of life (QOL) and increased fatigue. Naltrexone, an orally semisynthetic opiate antagonist, is FDA-approved for the treatment of heroin/alcohol addiction, and low dose naltrexone (LDN) has been observed to improve QOL and lower fatigue in other neurological illnesses, such as multiple sclerosis. LDN is believed to function as a partial agonist and can lead to shifts in neurochemicals that reduce fatigue. Based on this, we sought to study whether LDN has an impact on QOL and fatigue in patients with HGG. Methods: In a placebo-controlled, double-blind study, we randomized 110 HGG patients to receive placebo (N=56) or LDN 4.5 mg orally at night (N=54). Subjects received LDN or placebo at day 1 of concurrent radiation and temozolomide therapy and continued for 16 weeks. Change from baseline in patient-reported outcomes of QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain) and fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) was assessed. Results: Demographics were WHO grade IV (85%), male (56%), KPS 90-100 (51%), grossly resected (55%), and mean age of 56 years. QOL and fatigue changes between baseline and post concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy were not significantly different between patients receiving LDN or placebo. The adverse event profile for LDN and placebo were similar and attributed to concomitant use of temozolomide. Conclusions: While safe to administer, LDN has no effect on QOL and fatigue in HGG patients during concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. United States National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials.gov NCT01303835, Date 2/25/2011

ObjectivesStandard 6-week and hypofractionated 3-week courses of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) are both options for older patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but deciding the optimal regimen can be challenging. This analysis explores clinical factors associated with selection of RT course, completion of RT, and outcomes following RT.Materials and MethodsThis IRB-approved retrospective analysis identified patients ≥70 years old with GBM who initiated adjuvant RT at our institution between 2004 and 2016. We identified factors associated with standard or hypofractionated RT using the Cochran-Armitage trend test, estimated time-to-event endpoints using the Kaplan-Meier method, and found predictors of overall survival (OS) using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsSixty-two patients with a median age of 74 (range 70–90) initiated adjuvant RT, with 43 (69%) receiving standard RT and 19 (31%) receiving hypofractionated RT. Selection of short-course RT was associated with older age (p = 0.04) and poor KPS (p = 0.03). Eight (13%) patients did not complete RT, primarily for hospice care due to worsening symptoms. After a median follow-up of 37 months, median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI 9.0–15.1). Increased age (p < 0.05), poor KPS (p < 0.0001), lack of MGMT methylation (p < 0.05), and lack of RT completion (p < 0.0001) were associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis. In this small cohort, GTV size and receipt of standard or hypofractionated RT were not associated with OS.ConclusionsIn this cohort of older patients with GBM, age and KPS was associated with selection of short-course or standard RT. These regimens had similar OS, though a subset of patients experienced worsening symptoms during RT and discontinued treatment. Further investigation into predictors of RT completion and survival may help guide adjuvant therapies and supportive care for older patients.

BACKGROUND Low grade gliomas (LGGs) develop in young adults and represent 10-15% of all glial tumors. While LGG patients can have longer survival than higher grade tumors, progression, transformation, and ultimately mortality occurs. Mutations in Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/IDH2) are prevalent in LGG and are responsible for gliomagenesis. The classic IDH1 mutation is located at 132 codon and represented as p.Arg132His, but there are non-canonical IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. We sought to compare clinical characteristics of LGG patients with classic IDH1 p.Arg132His mutation to LGG patients with non-canonical IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. METHODS We queried an IRB-approved registry retrospectively from 12/2004- 9/2019. We included IDH1/IDH2 mutant LGG (WHO grade II) and known IDH1 and IDH2 targeted mutation analysis using standard PCR followed by DNA sequencing to detect point mutations in IDH1/IDH2 genes. We obtained available clinical and histopathological data. We estimated progression-free survival (PFS), time to transformation (TT), and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS We identified 267 LGG patients with median follow-up of 9.1 yrs (95%CI 8.4-9.9 yrs). Classic IDH1 p.Arg132His mutation occurred in 223 (83.9%) patients. IDH2 mutations occurred in 14 (5.2%) patients. Non-canonical IDH1 mutations were in 30 (11.2%) patients and included the following mutations: p.Arg132Cys (13), p.Arg132Gly (10), p.Arg132Ser (4), p.Arg132Leu (1), p.Arg119Gln (1), and p.Arg172Met (1). Initial presentation, OS, and TT did not differ between IDH1/IDH2 groups. PFS differed significantly between groups with improved median PFS in IDH2 mutant LGG (5.4 yrs; 95%CI 3.5-25.2) versus classic IDH1 mutant LGG (4.1 yrs; 95%CI 3.7-4.9 yrs) and non-canonical IDH1 mutant LGG (2.6 yrs; 95%CI 2.1-4.8) (log-rank p=0.019). Notably, non-canonical mutations were more common in astrocytoma (22/30; 73.3%) than other LGG histologies (p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS In this cohort, LGG patients with non-canonical mutations have a shorter time to progression than patients with classic p.Arg132His mutation and IDH2 mutations.

INTRODUCTION We previously reported to SNO, high levels of psychosocial distress in adult patients with primary brain tumors (PBTs), particularly during the first 6 months following diagnosis. The purpose of this follow-up study was to identify patterns of distress among older (≥ 65 years) patients with glioblastoma (GBM) compared to their younger (ages 18-64) counterparts. METHODS In our initial cross-sectional study, we collected the National Comprehensive Cancer Network’s Distress Thermometer (NCCN-DT) and problem list from adult patients with PBTs (WHO grades I-IV) seen at our institution between December 2013 and February 2016. We performed subsequent analyses on a subset of patients with GBM. RESULTS We identified 343 patients with GBM from the original dataset, of which 23.0% (n= 78) were ≥ 65 years old. The proportion of patients ≥ 65 years old with elevated distress (i.e. DT ≥ 4) was greater than the proportion of younger patients reporting elevated distress (47.4% vs 30.6%; p= 0.0068). Elevated distress was significantly greater during the first 6 months post diagnosis for all ages (p= 0.008). In subgroup analyses, a decrease in distress beyond 6 months was seen in younger patients (45.7% vs 27.4%; p= 0.021), but not in older patients. In older patients, a greater number of problems were selected on the NCCN DT and problem list tool: emotional and physical concerns were reported more frequently compared to their younger counterparts. Older patients were more likely to report difficulty with “bathing” and “getting around” (p= 0.009, p< 0.001, respectively). There were no differences in older versus younger GBM patients with regard to housing, transportation, treatment decisions, depression, fatigue, or memory. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to their younger counterparts, older patients with GBM experienced elevated levels of distress and a greater absolute number of specific psychosocial problems, mostly related to emotional and physical concerns.

Circumscribed low-grade gliomas comprise roughly one-third of pediatric CNS tumors. Most of these tumors are caused by activating mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Drugs targeting the MAPK pathway are effective in other cancers and are being utilized in low-grade gliomas. We describe treatment outcomes and toxicities in a series of thirteen low-grade glioma patients treated with trametinib. We performed a retrospective chart review to evaluate response on T2/FLAIR MRI images per updated RANO criteria, visual outcomes, tolerability, and durability of response in progressive low-grade glioma patients treated with trametinib. Thirteen patients age 22 months to 34 years were included. Best radiographic response on therapy included 2/13 partial response, 3/13 minimal response, 5/13 stable disease, and 3/13 progressive disease. Diagnoses included pilocytic astrocytoma (n=6), desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma (DIG; n=1), and low-grade glial neoplasms (n=2). Molecular drivers included BRAF:KIAA1549 fusion (n=3), V600E mutation (n=1), and somatic NF1 mutation (n=1). Three patients had germline NF1. In patients with partial or minimal response, best response was seen after longer durations of therapy; 4 of 5 best responses occurred after at least 12 months on therapy. Five patients completed prescribed therapy. Three patients remain stable off therapy at 6, 12, and 21 months; two patients recurred at 1 and 10 months off therapy. Skin manifestations were the predominant form of toxicity. This was more severe in older males, and symptoms improved with intermittent dosing. All patients with optic pathway tumors showed at least stable vision throughout treatment, with some patients having dramatic improvement. Trametinib is effective and well-tolerated in patients with low-grade glioma. Dermatologic toxicity can be mitigated by intermittent dosing. Best responses tended to occur later in therapy, sometimes after relatively stable MRIs. Patients with optic pathway lesions showed stable to improved vision even in the absence of significant radiographic response.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that involves the brain, spinal cord, or leptomeninges, without evidence of systemic disease. This rare disease accounts for ~ 3% of all primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Methotrexate-based regimens are the standard of care for this disease with overall survival rates ranging from 14 to 55 months. Relapse after apparent complete remission can occur. We sought to understand the outcomes of patients who relapsed.This is an IRB-approved investigation of patients treated at our institution between 12/31/2004 and 10/12/2016. We retrospectively identified all cases of PCNSL as part of a database registry and evaluated these cases for demographic information, absence or presence of relapse, location of relapse, treatment regimens, and median relapse-free survival.This analysis identified 44 patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL. Mean age at diagnosis was 63.1 years (range 20-86, SD = 13.2 years). Of the 44 patients, 28 patients successfully completed an initial treatment regimen without recurrence or toxicity that required a change in therapy. Relapse occurred in 11 patients with the location of relapse being in the CNS only (n = 5), vitreous fluid only (n = 1), outside CNS only (n = 3), or a combination of CNS and outside of the CNS (n = 2). Sites of relapse outside of the CNS included testes (n = 1), lung (n = 1), adrenal gland (n = 1), kidney/adrenal gland (n = 1), and retroperitoneum (n = 1). Median relapse-free survival after successful completion of therapy was 6.7 years (95% CI 1.1, 12.6).After successful initial treatment, PCNSL has a propensity to relapse, and this relapse can occur both inside and outside of the CNS. Vigilant monitoring of off-treatment patients with a history of PCNSL is necessary to guide early diagnosis of relapse and to initiate aggressive treatment.

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is a highly malignant brain tumor predominantly occurring in infants. Mutations of the SMARCB1 gene are the characteristic genetic lesion. SMARCB1-mutant tumors in adolescents and adults are rare and may show uncommon histopathological and clinical features. Here we report seven SMARCB1-deficient intracranial tumors sharing distinct clinical, histopathological and molecular features. Median age of the four females and three males was 40years (range 15–61years). All tumors were located in the pineal region. Histopathologically, these tumors displayed spindled and epithelioid cells embedded in a desmoplastic stroma alternating with a variable extent of a loose myxoid matrix. All cases showed loss of nuclear SMARCB1/INI1 protein expression, expression of EMA and CD34 was frequent and the Ki67/MIB1 proliferation index was low in the majority of cases (median 3%). Three cases displayed heterozygous SMARCB1 deletions and two cases a homozygous SMARCB1 deletion. On sequencing, one tumor showed a 2bp deletion in exon 4 (c.369_370del) and one a short duplication in exon 3 (c.237_276dup) both resulting in frameshift mutations. Most DNA methylation profiles were not classifiable using the Heidelberg Brain Tumor Classifier (version v11b4). By unsupervised t-SNE analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis, however, all tumors grouped closely together and showed similarities with ATRT-MYC. After a median observation period of 48months, three patients were alive with stable disease, whereas one patient experienced tumor progression and three patients had succumbed to disease. In conclusion, our series represents an entity with distinct clinical, histopathological and molecular features showing epigenetic similarities with ATRT-MYC. We propose the designation desmoplastic myxoid tumor (DMT), SMARCB1-mutant, for these tumors.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has fundamentally disrupted the practice of oncology, shifting care onto virtual platforms, rearranging the logistics and economics of running a successful clinical practice and research, and in some contexts, redefining what treatments patients with cancer should and can receive. Since the start of the pandemic in early 2020, there has been considerable emphasis placed on the implications for patients with cancer in terms of their vulnerability to the virus and potential exposure in healthcare settings. But little emphasis has been placed on the significant, and potentially enduring, consequences of COVID-19 for how cancer care is delivered. In this article, we outline the importance of a focus on the effects of COVID-19 for oncology practice during and potentially after the pandemic, focusing on key shifts that are already evident, including: the pivot to online consultations, shifts in access to clinical trial and definitions of “essential care,” the changing economics of practice, and the potential legacy effects of rapidly implemented changes in cancer care. COVID-19 is reshaping oncology practice, clinical trials, and delivery of cancer care broadly, and these changes might endure well beyond the short- to mid-term of the active pandemic. Therefore, shifts in practice brought about by the pandemic must be accompanied by improved training and awareness, enhanced infrastructure, and evidence-based support if they are to harness the positives and offset the potential negative consequences of the impacts of COVID-19 on cancer care.

Glioma-associated epilepsy is associated with excessive glutamate signaling. We hypothesized that perampanel, an amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-type glutamate receptor antagonist, would treat glioma-related epilepsy. We conducted a single-arm study of adjunctive perampanel for patients with focal-onset glioma-associated seizures. The most common related adverse events were fatigue and dizziness. Three out of 8 participants had self-reported seizure reduction and an additional 3 reported improved control. Of these 6, 5 had isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutant gliomas. We conclude that perampanel is safe for patients with glioma-related focal-onset epilepsy. Further study into the association between AMPA signaling, IDH1 status and seizures is warranted., Highlights • Seizures represent a major cause of morbidity in the brain tumor population. • Perampanel is safe in patients with gliomas. • Add-on therapy for glioma-related epilepsy can include perampanel.

OBJECTIVE There is no validated model for delivering palliative care (PC) in the glioblastoma (GBM) population. The primary objectives were to assess the feasibility and determine the acceptability of a time-based model of integrated specialty PC to patients and providers. Secondary objectives were to estimate the impact on healthcare utilization and quality of life (QoL) compared to historical controls. METHODS We consented and referred patients to PC at their initial Neuro-Oncology consultation between 4/2018 and 5/2019. We conducted QoL assessments (NCCN Distress Tool; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-BR); Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F); Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)) at (1) baseline (2) immediately after chemoradiation, and (3) 6 months following chemoradiation. Ongoing PC follow-up was at the discretion of the PC provider. We administered the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) before and after PC visits. We measured patient and referring provider satisfaction using FAMCARE-16 and a PC departmental survey, respectively. RESULTS We did not meet our goal enrollment of 50 patients. 32 were offered participation, 12 consented and 8 attended at least one PC visit. The mean number of PC visits was 1.6. Mean age was 62 (42–79). 75% had a KPS ≥80. Of those that did not complete the study, 2 died and 5 either withdrew consent or declined further visits. At baseline, 91.7 % had a NCCN distress score ≥4. Patients were overall satisfied with the intervention. CONCLUSION Introduction of specialty PC at the time of GBM diagnosis is challenging. Participants reported their experience as overall positive. Results from referring providers are pending. Due to low-enrollment we did not pursue further statistical comparisons regarding healthcare utilization compared to historical controls.

BACKGROUND Outpatient clinics treating neuro-oncology patients are becoming more multidisciplinary. Utilization of all team members is critical for the holistic care of these complex patients. Specifically, the role of a clinical pharmacist in the ambulatory multidisciplinary clinic remains undefined and will likely evolve as more therapeutic options are developed to treat central nervous system malignancies. We queried the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) membership about the availability of a clinical pharmacist in their ambulatory setting and, if present, the role of that clinical pharmacist. METHODS In an IRB exempt study, we surveyed the SNO community (targeting primarily clinicians) and analyzed responses to queries about clinical pharmacists in the ambulatory neuro-oncology setting. RESULTS Of the 65 SNO members who responded, 52 of these were clinical members. Of these 52 clinical members, the majority were physicians (88.5%, n=46). Of these 46 physicians, most were in academic practices (93.5%, n=43). Over half of the 52 clinical respondents (51.9%, n=27) reported that they saw ≥ 30 primary brain tumor patients a month, thus typifying busy clinical neuro-oncology ambulatory clinics. Despite having busy clinics, only 12 (28.6%) of the 42 providers with access to a clinical pharmacist reported that their clinical pharmacist was solely dedicated to neuro-oncology patients. For the respondents who had access to a clinical pharmacist, only 28 (66.7%) of those pharmacists had direct patient interaction in the clinic. The top three roles of the clinical pharmacist included medication review (81%, n=34), chemotherapy dosing and modifications (73.8%, n=31), and practice guideline development (61.9%, n=26), none of which are associated with direct patient interaction. CONCLUSIONS We found that while our surveyed population of SNO clinical members have demanding outpatient neuro-oncology practices, most do not have the support or expertise of dedicated neuro-oncology clinical pharmacists.

BACKGROUND Low grade gliomas (LGGs) represent 10–15% of glial tumors in adults and while LGG patients have a better prognosis over high-grade gliomas, these cancers ultimately recur and transform to more aggressive tumors. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) is commonly mutated in LGG, and when mutated, it is the oncogenic driver by leading to the production of oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). We developed a phase 1 study for recurrent resectable IDH1 mutant LGG utilizing a tumor-specific peptide vaccine targeting IDH1 mutant protein that spans the mutated region of IDHR132H (PEPIDH1M vaccine). METHODS We performed a phase 1, single-center, clinical trial in recurrent resectable IDH1 mutant WHO grade II glioma patients. Subjects received three PEPIDH1M vaccine q2wks and then proceeded to surgical resection. If subject’s tumor retained grade II status, then the subject proceeded with 12 cycles of daily TMZ (50 mg/m2 X 28 days) and PEPIDH1M vaccine (12 injections q4wks). If subject’s tumor transformed to grade III, then subject proceeded to radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent TMZ followed by 12 cycles of daily TMZ (50 mg/m2 X 28 days) and PEPIDH1M vaccine (12 injections q4wks). Primary endpoint was safety of PEPIDH1M vaccine in combination with adjuvant TMZ and/or XRT/TMZ and evaluable subjects needed to receive ≥6 PEPIDH1M vaccines. We assessed safety using CTCAE 4.03. RESULTS We enrolled 24 recurrent LGG subjects with mean age of 43.8 yrs (sd=11.4 yrs). Twenty subjects completed ≥6 PEPIDH1M vaccines. Most common related toxicity was grade 1 injection site reaction (N=20) and skin induration (n=17) with no grade 3–4 related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS PEPIDH1M vaccine in combination with surgical resection, daily TMZ and/or RT + TMZ with daily TMZ was safe and well tolerated in recurrent IDH1 mutant LGG. We are currently exploring secondary/correlative endpoints including immunogenicity of PEPIDH1M vaccine and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for 2-HG.

BACKGROUND D2C7-IT is a recombinant immunotoxin comprised of a dual-specific antibody fragment targeting EGFRwt and EGFRvIII and a genetically engineered form of the Pseudomonas exotoxin, PE38-KDEL. We report results of a phase 1 trial, with dose expansion at the selected phase 2 dose, evaluating D2C7-IT delivered intratumorally by CED. METHODS Eligible patients are adults with recurrent supratentorial WHO grade III or IV MG; solitary tumor; ≥4 weeks after chemotherapy, bevacizumab or study drug; adequate organ function; and KPS >70%. Two patients per dose level (DL) were to be enrolled in the dose escalation portion (dose range: 40ng/mL to 23,354ng/mL), followed by dose expansion at the selected phase 2 dose (DL13). RESULTS As of 6/07/2019, 51 patients have been treated; 10 patients on the phase 2 dose. Observed dose limiting toxicities include: grade 4 seizure (n=1) on DL3, grade 3 confusion and pyramidal tract syndrome (n=1) on DL13, and grade 4 cerebral edema (n=1) and grade 3 dysphasia (n=1) on DL17. Grade 3 or higher adverse events possibly related to D2C7-IT include: seizure (grade 4, n=2, grade 3, n=3), cerebral edema (grade 4, n=1), hydrocephalus (grade 3, n=5), headache (grade 3, n=4), hemiparesis (grade 3, n=4), dysphasia (grade 3, n=4), lymphopenia (grade 3, n=3), thromboembolic event (grade 3, n=3); and one each of grade 3 elevated ALT, urinary tract infection, fall, wound complication, generalized muscle weakness, confusion, encephalopathy, and somnolence. Fourteen patients are alive. Three patients have partial radiographic response and remain alive without additional therapy more than 46, 27 and 21 months after D2C7-IT infusion. CONCLUSION Dose level 13 was selected as the optimal phase 2 dose and patient accrual is ongoing on the dose expansion arm. Encouraging efficacy results have been observed. A trial of D2C7-IT with checkpoint inhibitor is planned to start in the near future.

We sought to identify characteristics of glioblastoma (GBM) patients with short survival (< 10 months) in order to identify prognostic factors useful for guiding treatment management. This is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of adult newly diagnosed GBM patients from 2008–2016 who survived < 10 months from diagnosis. We extracted demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment details. We calculated survival from surgical diagnosis to date of death. The cohort includes 197 subjects (61% male) with a median age of 68 years (range 19–94). The majority (93%) are non-Hispanic white. The cohort has a median survival of 144 days (95% CI: 130–160). We focused on traditional prognostic indicators, including extent of surgical resection and KPS. A majority had biopsy only (n=92, 46.7%) rather than gross total (n=59, 29.9%) or subtotal (n=46, 23.4%) resection. Moreover, 160 out of 197 patients had a documented KPS with a majority being below 90 (KPS=70–80 (n=96); KPS < 70 (n=31)). Of 179 patients with data on RT course, 18% (n=32) received no RT or opted for hospice after diagnosis, 3% (n=6) received only RT, 54% (n=97) received RT+temozolomide (TMZ), and 24% (n=43) received RT+TMZ+bevacizumab. Of the 147 subjects receiving RT, 79% completed their RT course as prescribed. Most commonly, RT was prescribed as a 6- to 6-1/2-week course (85%), typically 59.4 Gy (45Gy primary, 14.4Gy boost) over 33 fractions or 60 Gy over 30 fractions. In contrast, 15% received a 3-week RT course, typically scheduled as 15 fractions of 2.667 Gy. We concluded that GBM patients with survival < 10 months were more likely to have biopsy only and a KPS < 90, notably associated with poorer prognosis. We continue to explore this dataset for further prognostic factors, particularly inability to complete planned RT course, and are comparing these traits to a larger cohort.

With a bleak prognosis for malignant glioma, maintaining quality of life (QoL) and decreasing distress of the patient are important in the clinical care of the patient. Mindfulness meditation is a mind-body therapy that has been recently investigated in the oncology field as a non-pharmacological strategy to ameliorate cancer symptoms and to improve QoL. This practice has not been studied in the primary brain tumor population. We initiated a pilot study among newly diagnosed brain tumor patients with the hypothesis that mindfulness meditation practice may benefit the patient by decreasing stress and anxiety and provide a means to cope with their new diagnosis. The specific aim of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of a mindfulness meditation program to this population during standard of care chemoradiation and to determine whether it merits additional research in a subsequent trial. The intervention consists of six weekly one hour telephone-based mindfulness sessions followed by one in- person mindfulness session consisting of: mindfulness and healing, understanding stress, abiding in kindness, working with difficult emotions, finding peace, going forward and living fully. Subjects are provided with downloadable guided meditations. We plan to enroll fifteen newly diagnosed WHO grade III or IV malignant glioma subjects prior to their 6 week chemoradiation course. We will determine the percentage of subjects approached vs enrolled, number of sessions that each subject attends, completion of study questionnaires and satisfaction of the subjects. QoL surveys include: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Brain, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Cognitive Function, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire – short form. 13 subjects have been approached and 8 signed consent over a two-month period. We will provide final study results at time of presentation.

The majority of glioblastomas can be classified into molecular subgroups based on mutations in the TERT promoter (TERTp) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH). These molecular subgroups utilize distinct genetic mechanisms of telomere maintenance, either TERTp mutation leading to telomerase activation or ATRX-mutation leading to an alternative lengthening of telomeres phenotype (ALT). However, about 20% of glioblastomas lack alterations in TERTp and IDH. These tumors, designated TERTpWT-IDHWT glioblastomas, do not have well-established genetic biomarkers or defined mechanisms of telomere maintenance. Here we report the genetic landscape of TERTpWT-IDHWT glioblastoma and identify SMARCAL1 inactivating mutations as a novel genetic mechanism of ALT. Furthermore, we identify a novel mechanism of telomerase activation in glioblastomas that occurs via chromosomal rearrangements upstream of TERT. Collectively, our findings define novel molecular subgroups of glioblastoma, including a telomerase-positive subgroup driven by TERT-structural rearrangements (IDHWT-TERTSV), and an ALT-positive subgroup (IDHWT-ALT) with mutations in ATRX or SMARCAL1., Glioblastoma can be classified based on IDH and TERT promoter mutations, but ~20% of glioblastoma do not have these mutations (TERTpWT-IDHWT glioblastoma). Here, the authors present a genetic landscape of TERTpWT-IDHWT glioblastoma, identifying a telomerase-positive subgroup driven by TERT-structural rearrangements and an ALT-positive subgroup with mutations in ATRX or SMARCAL1.

INTRODUCTION There is increasing recognition that palliative care (PC) can benefit patients with advanced cancers. However, early referral to PC is not yet a reality for patients diagnosed with a primary brain tumor. We hypothesize that lack of knowledge and/or misperceptions regarding PC by patients, caregivers, or their providers remain barriers. METHODS This is an IRB-exempt, one-time QR-accessible REDcap questionnaire administered to patients, caregivers, and providers at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center between September 2020 and May 2021. We administered 9 questions regarding knowledge and beliefs about PC from the Health Information National Trends Survey 5, Cycle 2: results of this nationally representative U.S. sample are publicly available and used for comparison. RESULTS We had 141 survey respondents: 25 providers, 59 patients, and 57 caregivers. The median patient and caregiver ages were 49 (21-74) and 50 years (24-73), respectively. Caregivers were more likely female (55.2 %) and identified as a spouse or domestic partner (58.2%). Providers, were equally distributed by years of experience. Compared to patients and caregivers, providers reported more baseline knowledge of PC (p< 0.0001, p< 0.0001) and better understood the role of PC in pain/symptom management (p=0.0038, p=0.0087) and social/emotional support (p=0.0044, p=0.0279). Interestingly, most providers (76.0%) disagreed with the statement “the goal of palliative care is to give patients more time at the end of life.” Compared to a general U.S. sample (n=1,162) our patients (n=39) were better informed in only 2 of 9 questions. Whereas, caregivers (n=48) were better informed in 6 of 9 questions. CONCLUSION Neuro-oncology providers were knowledgeable, but a minor gap in understanding the goal of PC was identified. Caregivers were overall more knowledgeable than patients. However, Neuro-oncology patients, had similar knowledge and beliefs compared to a nationally representative sample. PC interventions should prioritize filling knowledge gaps for Neuro-oncology patients.

Prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is poor with 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) ranging from 9 to 48% depending on the treatment regimen and use of anti-angiogenic therapies. We sought to study vorinostat (VOR), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) and daily metronomic temozolomide (TMZ) in a Phase I/II trial in recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs). This was a Phase I/II open-label, single-arm study in recurrent HGG patients. Phase I primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VOR with BEV and daily TMZ. Phase II primary endpoint was PFS6. Regimen was BEV 10 mg/kg iv every 2 weeks, TMZ 50 mg/m2 po daily, and VOR 200 or 400 mg po alternating 7 days on then 7 days off throughout a 28-day cycle. Phase I portion enrolled nine subjects with three receiving VOR 200 mg and 6 receiving VOR 400 mg. With no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at 200 mg and one DLT (thrombocytopenia, Grade 3) at 400 mg, the MTD was 400 mg. Phase II portion enrolled 39 GBM subjects, and PFS6 was 53.8% (95% CI 37.2–67.9%). Of note, 14 subjects had received prior BEV and all had received prior 5-day TMZ. Combination therapy with VOR, BEV, and daily TMZ was well tolerated and safe. While PFS6 was not statistically improved beyond historical controls, it is important to note that this was a heavily pretreated GBM population and further consideration is warranted in a less pretreated group.

9521 Background: Previous work has shown that MBM have a unique molecular profile compared to ECM. Description of the biology of MBM will facilitate the design of rational therapies for patients (pts) with MBM. Methods: We analyzed a previously published dataset from MD Anderson Cancer Center, which includes RNA-seq on surgically resected FFPE MBM (88 tumors from 74 pts) and surgically resected ECM from the same pts (50 from 34 pts). WES on 18 matched pairs of MBM and ECM was available. The STAR pipeline was used to estimate mRNA abundance. The DESeq2 package was used to perform differential gene expression (DGE) analyses. Pathway analysis was performed using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Paired DGE and GSEA analyses comparing MBM vs. lymph node metastases (LN mets, n = 16) and MBM vs. skin mets (n = 10) were performed. CIBERSORT estimated relative abundance of immune cell types in MBM and ECM. The GATK Mutect2 pipeline was used to call somatic mutations using paired normal tumor samples. Mutations were annotated using the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor and visualized using the Maftools package in R. RNA-seq was available on 54 primary cutaneous melanoma (CM) pt samples, including 19 CM which did not recur, 19 CM which recurred as MBM, and 16 CM which recurred as ECM. Gene Ontology or KEGG Pathway analysis was performed using goana function of limma package in R. Results: Comparing MBM vs. LN and MBM vs. skin mets, paired DGE identified 136 and 89 up-regulated genes with a fold change > 2 and false-discovery rate (FDR) q-value < 0.05. Moreover, 308 and 659 down-regulated genes with a fold change < 0.5 were identified in MBM vs. LN and MBM vs. skin mets, respectively (q < 0.05). Paired GSEA found that autophagy signaling pathways may be up-regulated in MBM vs. LN and MBM vs. skin mets. On a single-gene level, comparing both MBM vs. LN and skin mets, the most strongly up-regulated genes in autophagy pathways were GFAP and HBB, whereas fold changes in the majority of other autophagy-related genes were low and did not reach significance. Comparison between CM which recurred in brain vs. CM which did not recur identified up-regulation of autophagy pathways. No difference in autophagy pathway expression was observed comparing between CM with any recurrence vs. without recurrence. CIBERSORT identified an increased proportion of immune suppressive M2 macrophages compared to tumor suppressive M1 macrophages in both MBMs and ECMs. Conclusions: Up-regulation of autophagy pathways was observed in pt-matched MBM vs. LN and skin mets. This finding seemed to be driven by up-regulation of GFAP and HBB, which could reflect changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Future studies using single-cell RNA-seq or spatial transcriptomic technology will dissect the TME. A higher M2:M1 ratio may contribute to an immune suppressive tumor microenvironment in MBM and ECM and is targetable. Validation of our findings in an independent Duke dataset is ongoing.

Glioma therapeutic resistance to alkylating chemotherapy is mediated via O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). We hypothesized that a CD45/HAM56/MGMT double-stained cocktail would improve MGMT discrimination in tumor cells versus inflammatory and endothelial cells (IEC). Total MGMT protein was quantified by IHC on 982 glioblastomas (GBM) and 199 anaplastic astrocytomas. Correcting for IEC was done by a CD45/HAM56/MGMT 2-color cocktail. Lowest IEC infiltrates (IEC “cold spots”) were identified to quantitate MGMT as well as the percentage of IEC% in the IEC cold spots. MGMT promoter methylation (PM) was also determined. Among the GBM biopsies, mean uncorrected and corrected MGMT% were 19.87 (range 0–90) and 16.67; mean IEC% was 18.65 (range 1–80). Four hundred and fifty one (45.9%) GBM biopsies were positive MGMT PM. Both uncorrected and corrected MGMT% positivity correlated with PM. All 3 MGMT scores correlated with overall survival (OS) in GBM’s. Cold spot IEC% was also positively associated with OS. These effects remained in a multivariate model after adjusting for age and disease status. Prognosis determined by correcting MGMT% score for IEC% is not improved in this analysis. However, IEC COLD SPOT score does provide additional prognostic information that can be gained from this correction method.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the adaptability to the patterns in symptoms and quality of life (QoL) during 6 months post low-grade glioma diagnosis by valid and reliable tools; to identify through qualitative interviews patient/provider adaptive techniques and strategies; and to assess associations among patient characteristics, symptoms and QoL, and adaptive techniques or strategies. DATA SOURCES: Demographic, clinical and pathologic data from medical records. Validated instruments that assess QoL, fatigue, depression, and distress were completed at 2, 4, and 6 months post diagnosis. Qualitative interviews identifying the symptoms, challenges, adaptive techniques and strategies were conducted at 4 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: The most frequently used adaptive strategies included: obtaining community support (87%), managing expectations (73%) and support systems (67%), and seeking out knowledge about physical (67%) and behav-ioral symptoms (53%). Seizures were reported with IDH1(mut) (11%) but not IDH1(wildtype). Patients with either IDH1(mut) or TERT(mut) consistently reported lower QoL and higher distress, depression, and fatigue scores. IDH1/TERT(mut) may be related to lower QoL because of IDH1(mut)-related seizures. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Findings provide a list of adaptive strategies and characteristics to address the problems and symptoms that may improve overall QoL in patients with low-grade glioma.

INTRODUCTION: Meningiomas, the most common CNS neoplasm, are often deemed less threatening than their glial counterparts. Unfortunately, these tumors recur and necessitate surgery, radiation, and/or systemic treatment. We explored the psychosocial distress of patients with recurrent meningioma using The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (NCCN-DT) and Problem List. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent meningioma seen at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center between 12/31/2004–10/10/2018 who completed a NCCN-DT and Problem List. The first or only NCCN-DT assessment after initial recurrence was used for analysis with a score of 4 indicating moderate to severe distress. RESULTS: 45 patients were identified, 56% female, median age was 61 years and 58% had unifocal disease. 60% were Grade 1, 33% Grade II, 4% Grade III, and 2% indeterminate recurrent meningioma. The median NCCN-DT score was 3, and 49% had a NCCN-DT score 4 indicating moderate to severe distress. 64% of females vs 30% of males reported distress scores 4 (p=0.04). 65% of patients with unifocal disease reported 4 scores compared to 26% with multifocal disease (p=0.02). Fatigue (N=24), Worry (N=23), Nervousness (N=22), Depression (N=19) and Memory/Concentration (N=19) were the most commonly reported problems. A higher incidence of worry among females (64%) than males (35%) was the only problem showing a trend towards significance (p=0.08). Between initial recurrence and NCCN assessment, the type and number of treatments patients received included: surgery (median=1, range 0–5), radiation (median=2, range 0–5), systemic treatment (median=2, range 0–12). There was no association between distress and the number of surgeries (p=0.99), radiation treatments (p=0.49) or systemic therapies (p=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, nearly half of recurrent meningioma patients reported moderate to severe distress. Therefore, even in this benign tumor population, the NCCN-DT and problem list should be administered at every clinic visit.

BACKGROUND: D2C7-IT is a recombinant immunotoxin comprised of a dual-specific antibody fragment targeting EGFRwt and EGFRvIII and a genetically engineered form of the Pseudomonas exotoxin, PE38-KDEL. We report results of a phase 1 trial evaluating D2C7-IT delivered intratumorally by CED. METHODS: Eligible patients are adults with recurrent supratentorial WHO grade III or IV MG; solitary tumor; ≥4 weeks after chemotherapy, bevacizumab or study drug; adequate organ function; and KPS>70%. Planned enrollment of two patients per dose level (DL). RESULTS: As of 5/29/2018, 43 patients have been treated (2 each per DL, but for DLs 3, 6, 9, and 16). Observed dose limiting toxicities include: grade 4 seizure (n=1) on DL3, grade 3 confusion and pyramidal tract syndrome (n=1) on DL13, and grade 4 cerebral edema and grade 3 dysphasia (n=2) on DL17. Grade 2 or higher adverse events possibly related to D2C7-IT include: seizure (grade 4, n=2, grade 3, n=2, grade 2, n=4), cerebral edema (grade 4, n=1), headache (grade 3, n=4; grade 2, n=18), hemiparesis (grade 3, n=4, grade 2, n=10), dysphasia (grade 3, n=2; grade 2, n=9), confusion (grade 3, n=1; grade 2, n=5), thromboembolic event (grade 3, n=2; grade 2, n=1), fatigue (grade 2, n=6), visual field cut (grade 2, n=3), paresthesia (grade 2, n=2), stroke (grade 2, n=2), and hemineglect (grade 2, n=2); one each of grade 3 elevated ALT, urinary tract infection, fall, generalized muscle weakness, encephalopathy, and somnolence; one each of grade 2 elevated AST, papilledema, gait disturbance, intracranial hemorrhage, and urinary incontinence. Fifteen patients are alive. Two patients have partial response and are alive ≥8.2 months and ≥34 months after infusion. CONCLUSION: DL17 is above the maximal tolerated dose. Encouraging efficacy results were observed. After review of efficacy and safety data, DL13 seems the optimal dose, additional patients will be treated on DL13.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and deadly primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Mutations in the TERT promoter (TERTp) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) can classify ~80% of GBMs into molecular subgroups with distinct clinical courses. These molecular subgroups utilize distinct genetic mechanisms of telomere maintenance, either TERTp mutation leading to telomerase activation or ATRX-mutation leading to an alternative lengthening of telomeres phenotype (ALT). However, approximately 20% of GBMs lack alterations in TERTp and IDH1/2. These tumors, designated TERTp(WT)-IDH(WT) or triple-negative glioblastomas (as they also lack 1p19q co-deletion) do not have well-established genetic biomarkers or defined mechanisms of telomere maintenance. Here we performed whole-exome, whole-genome, and RNA-sequencing on a cohort of triple-negative GBMs to define their genetic landscape. We discovered recurrent inactivating mutations in SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A-like 1 (SMARCAL1) in 21% (8/39) of triple-negative GBMs. Using telomere maintenance characterization assays, we show that SMARCAL1-mutant cases exhibited the ALT phenotype. Using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in GBM cell lines, we found that inducing loss of SMARCAL1 generates features of ALT. Rescue of expression of SMARCAL1 in SMARCAL1-null cell lines markedly suppressed ALT features and was dependent on the enzyme helicase activity. Furthermore, using break-apart FISH and whole genome sequencing, we identified recurrent rearrangements upstream of TERT in ~50% of triple-negative GBMs. These TERT-rearranged tumors exhibited elevated levels of TERT mRNA expression. This represents a novel mechanism of telomerase activation in GBMs lacking the well-known TERT promoter hotspot mutations. Finally, we identify recurrent BRAF V600E mutations in younger patients with GBM. Collectively, our findings define novel molecular subgroups of glioblastoma, including a telomerase-positive subgroup driven by TERT-structural rearrangements (IDH(WT)-TERT(SV), ~50%), and an ALT-positive subgroup (IDH(WT)-ALT, ~40%) with mutations in ATRX or SMARCAL1. We also establish SMARCAL1 inactivating