Search

[Background and Aims] Surrogate endpoints that predict complications are necessary for assessment and approval of NASH therapies. We assessed associations between histologic and noninvasive tests (NITs) of fibrosis with liver‐related complications in patients with NASH cirrhosis., [Approach and Results] Patients with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH were enrolled in two placebo‐controlled trials of simtuzumab and selonsertib. Liver fibrosis at baseline and week 48 (W48) was staged by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) and Ishak classifications and a machine learning (ML) approach, hepatic collagen and alpha‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA) expression were quantified by morphometry, liver stiffness (LS) was measured by transient elastography, and serum NITs (enhanced liver fibrosis [ELF], NAFLD fibrosis score [NFS], and Fibrosis‐4 index [FIB‐4]) were calculated. Cox regression determined associations between these parameters at baseline and their changes over time with adjudicated liver‐related clinical events. Among 1,135 patients, 709 (62%) had Ishak stage 6 fibrosis, and median ELF and LS were 10.66 and 21.1 kPa, respectively. During a median follow‐up of 16.6 months, 71 (6.3%) had a liver‐related event; associated baseline factors included Ishak stage 6 fibrosis, and higher hepatic collagen, α‐SMA expression, ML‐based fibrosis parameters, LS, ELF, NFS, and FIB‐4. Cirrhosis regression observed in 16% (176/1,135) between BL and W48 was associated with a lower risk of events versus nonregression (1.1% [2/176] vs. 7.2% [69/957]; HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04, 0.65 [p = 0.0104]). Conversely, after adjustment for baseline values, increases in hepatic collagen, α‐SMA, ML‐based fibrosis parameters, NFS, and LS were associated with an increased risk of events., [Conclusions] In patients with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH, regression of fibrosis is associated with a reduction in liver‐related complications. These data support the utility of histologic fibrosis regression and NITs as clinical trial endpoints for NASH cirrhosis., This analysis was supported by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.

Background & aims Hepatic fibrosis secondary to HCV infection can lead to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation. Sustained virologic response (SVR) is possible with direct-acting antiviral drug regimens; however, patients with advanced fibrosis have an increased risk for HCC. Heat shock protein 47 (HSP47), a key collagen chaperone, has been implicated in fibrosis development. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of BMS-986263, a lipid nanoparticle delivering siRNA designed to degrade HSP47 mRNA, for the treatment of advanced fibrosis. Approach & results NCT03420768 was a Phase 2, randomized (1:1:2), placebo-controlled trial conducted at a hepatology clinic in the USA. Patients with HCV-SVR (for ≥1 year) and advanced fibrosis received once-weekly intravenous infusions of placebo or BMS-986263 (45 mg or 90 mg) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was ≥1 METAVIR stage improvement at Week 12; key secondary endpoints included Ishak score improvement, pharmacokinetics, fibrosis biomarkers, and safety. All 61 patients completed treatment and 2/15 (13%; placebo), 3/18 (17%; 45 mg), and 6/28 (21%; 90 mg) had METAVIR improvements of ≥1 stage at Week 12. Five patients in the 90 mg arm had Ishak improvements by ≥2 stages. BMS-986263 plasma concentrations increased in a generally dose-proportional fashion between BMS-986263 doses, with no notable accumulation with weekly dosing. All adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in intensity; most treatment-related AEs were infusion-related reactions in the BMS-986263 arms. At baseline, collagen levels were low, indicating low levels of fibrogenesis in these patients. Conclusions In patients with HCV-SVR, BMS-986263 administration was generally well tolerated through Week 36 and resulted in METAVIR and Ishak score improvements. Further evaluation of BMS-986263 in patients with active fibrogenesis is warranted.

The benefits of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) have been validated, although improvements in efficacy and/or tolerability remain elusive. Herein, we aimed to assess the performance of a structurally optimized FXR agonist in patients with NASH.In this 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated MET409 - a non-bile acid agonist with a unique chemical scaffold - in patients with NASH. Patients were randomized to receive either 80 mg (n = 20) or 50 mg (n = 19) of MET409, or placebo (n = 19).At Week 12, MET409 lowered liver fat content (LFC), with mean relative reductions of 55% (80 mg) and 38% (50 mg) vs. 6% in placebo (p0.001). MET409 achieved ≥30% relative LFC reduction in 93% (80 mg) and 75% (50 mg) of patients vs. 11% in placebo (p0.001) and normalized LFC (≤5%) in 29% (80 mg) and 31% (50 mg) of patients vs. 0% in placebo (p0.05). An increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was observed with MET409, confounding Week 12 changes from baseline (-25% for 80 mg, 28% for 50 mg). Nonetheless, MET409 achieved ≥30% relative ALT reduction in 50% (80 mg) and 31% (50 mg) of patients vs. 17% in placebo. MET409 was associated with on-target high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreases (mean changes of -23.4% for 80 mg and -20.3% for 50 mg vs. 2.6% in placebo) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) increases (mean changes of 23.7% for 80 mg and 6.8% for 50 mg vs. -1.5% in placebo). Pruritus (mild-moderate) occurred in 16% (50 mg) and 40% (80 mg) of MET409-treated patients.MET409 lowered LFC over 12 weeks in patients with NASH and delivered a differentiated pruritus and LDL-C profile at 50 mg, providing the first clinical evidence that the risk-benefit profile of FXR agonists can be enhanced through structural optimization.Activation of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a clinically validated approach for treating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), although side effects such as itching or increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol are frequently dose-limiting. MET409, an FXR agonist with a unique chemical structure, led to significant liver fat reduction and delivered a favorable side effect profile after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with NASH. These results provide the first clinical evidence that the risk-benefit profile of FXR agonists can be enhanced.

Background and aims Manual histological assessment is currently the accepted standard for diagnosing and monitoring disease progression in NASH, but is limited by variability in interpretation and insensitivity to change. Thus, there is a critical need for improved tools to assess liver pathology in order to risk stratify NASH patients and monitor treatment response. Approach and results Here, we describe a machine learning (ML)-based approach to liver histology assessment, which accurately characterizes disease severity and heterogeneity, and sensitively quantifies treatment response in NASH. We use samples from three randomized controlled trials to build and then validate deep convolutional neural networks to measure key histological features in NASH, including steatosis, inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, and fibrosis. The ML-based predictions showed strong correlations with expert pathologists and were prognostic of progression to cirrhosis and liver-related clinical events. We developed a heterogeneity-sensitive metric of fibrosis response, the Deep Learning Treatment Assessment Liver Fibrosis score, which measured antifibrotic treatment effects that went undetected by manual pathological staging and was concordant with histological disease progression. Conclusions Our ML method has shown reproducibility and sensitivity and was prognostic for disease progression, demonstrating the power of ML to advance our understanding of disease heterogeneity in NASH, risk stratify affected patients, and facilitate the development of therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Pangenotypic, all-oral direct-acting antivirals, such as glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P), are recommended for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Concerns exist about the impact on efficacy in patients with suboptimal adherence, particularly with shorter treatment durations. These post hoc analyses evaluated adherence (based on pill count) in patients prescribed 8- or 12-week G/P, the impact of nonadherence on sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12), factors associated with nonadherence, and efficacy in patients interrupting G/P treatment. METHODS: Data were pooled from 10 phase 3 clinical trials of treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1–6 without cirrhosis/with compensated cirrhosis (treatment adherence analysis) and 13 phase 3 clinical trials of all patients with HCV (interruption analysis). RESULTS: Among 2,149 patients included, overall mean adherence was 99.4%. Over the treatment duration, adherence decreased (weeks 0–4: 100%; weeks 5–8: 98.3%; and weeks 9–12: 97.1%) and the percentage of patients with ≥80% or ≥90% adherence declined. SVR12 rate in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population was 97.7% (modified ITT SVR12 99.3%) and remained high in nonadherent patients in the modified ITT population (

Background: Sofosbuvir, a prodrug nucleoside inhibitor of hepatitis C virus, has a predominant circulating metabolite that is renally eliminated. Whether sofosbuvir is associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression is not well understood.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30-89 mL/min/1.73 m2 treated with sofosbuvir in 76 Phase 2/3 registrational trials. We evaluated eGFR at each study visit. Separately, we performed a retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database (IQVIA PharMetrics Plus™) to compare the risk of incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with the use of sofosbuvir or non-sofosbuvir regimens among patients with CKD using propensity score methods. Exposure, CKD status and outcomes were determined using diagnosis and medication claim codes. Cox proportional hazards methods were used to estimate ESRD risk.Results: Among 4642 trial participants with baseline stage 2 CKD (eGFR 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) and 682 trial participants with stage 3 CKD (eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) mean (SD) eGFR improved from baseline to 4 weeks post-treatment (+0.7 [9.3] and +2.6 [8.8] ml/min/1.73 m2 , respectively; p < 0.001 each). In the second analysis, among 2042 patients with CKD receiving sofosbuvir-based regimens compared to 431 receiving non-sofosbuvir-based regimens, after adjusting for baseline covariates and weighting based on treatment propensity scores, there was no significant difference in risk of ESRD (adjusted HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.51-1.42).Conclusions: Clinical trial participants with CKD did not experience worsening eGFR during sofosbuvir-based treatment, and sofosbuvir was not associated with an increased risk of ESRD in patients with CKD in a nationally-representative administrative claims database.

Background and aims We evaluated the safety and efficacy of cilofexor (formerly GS-9674), a small-molecule nonsteroidal agonist of farnesoid X receptor, in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Approach and results In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, 140 patients with noncirrhotic NASH, diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) ≥8% and liver stiffness ≥2.5 kPa by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) or historical liver biopsy, were randomized to receive cilofexor 100 mg (n = 56), 30 mg (n = 56), or placebo (n = 28) orally once daily for 24 weeks. MRI-PDFF, liver stiffness by MRE and transient elastography, and serum markers of fibrosis were measured at baseline and week 24. At baseline, median MRI-PDFF was 16.3% and MRE-stiffness was 3.27 kPa. At week 24, patients receiving cilofexor 100 mg had a median relative decrease in MRI-PDFF of -22.7%, compared with an increase of 1.9% in those receiving placebo (P = 0.003); the 30-mg group had a relative decrease of -1.8% (P = 0.17 vs. placebo). Declines in MRI-PDFF of ≥30% were experienced by 39% of patients receiving cilofexor 100 mg (P = 0.011 vs. placebo), 14% of those receiving cilofexor 30 mg (P = 0.87 vs. placebo), and 13% of those receiving placebo. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase, C4, and primary bile acids decreased significantly at week 24 in both cilofexor treatment groups, whereas significant changes in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis scores and liver stiffness were not observed. Cilofexor was generally well-tolerated. Moderate to severe pruritus was more common in patients receiving cilofexor 100 mg (14%) than in those receiving cilofexor 30 mg (4%) and placebo (4%). Conclusions Cilofexor for 24 weeks was well-tolerated and provided significant reductions in hepatic steatosis, liver biochemistry, and serum bile acids in patients with NASH. ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02854605.

Background Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) are now the most common indications for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. A subset of patients have both alcoholic and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (BASH). This study characterizes patients with BASH requiring LT and assesses changes in the prevalence of BASH as an indication for LT. Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing database was analyzed for all patients ≥ 18 years of age who received their first deceased donor LT from 2002 to 2016 for ALD, NASH, or BASH. Baseline demographics, clinical parameters, and LT outcomes were compared between groups. Results Since 2002, 85,448 patients underwent LT:15,327 had ALD, 9,971 had NASH, and 2,779 had BASH. The prevalence of BASH as an indication for LT increased from 0.5% in 2002 to 5% in 2016. Compared with patients with NASH, those with BASH were significantly more likely to be male (85.6 vs. 57%), younger (mean 56.4 vs. 58.6 years), and Hispanic (22.2 vs. 13.6%) (p Conclusions BASH is a rising indication for LT, especially for Hispanic males, due to the increasing prevalence of ALD and NASH in the United States.

Background & Aims Emricasan, an oral pan-caspase inhibitor, decreased portal pressure in experimental cirrhosis and in an open-label study in patients with cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension, defined as a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥12 mmHg. We aimed to confirm these results in a placebo-controlled study in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related cirrhosis. Methods We performed a multicenter double-blinded study, randomizing 263 patients with NASH-related cirrhosis and baseline HVPG ≥12 mmHg to twice daily oral emricasan 5 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg or placebo in a 1:1:1:1 ratio for up to 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in HVPG (ΔHVPG) at week 24. Secondary endpoints were changes in biomarkers (aminotransferases, caspases, cytokeratins) and development of liver-related outcomes. Results There were no significant differences in ΔHVPG for any emricasan dose vs. placebo (−0.21, −0.45, −0.58 mmHg, respectively) adjusted for baseline HVPG, compensation status, and non-selective beta-blocker use. Compensated patients (n = 201 [76%]) tended to have a greater decrease in HVPG (emricasan all vs. placebo, p = 0.06), the decrease being greater in those with higher baseline HVPG (p = 0.018), with a significant interaction between baseline HVPG (continuous, p = 0.024; dichotomous at 16 mmHg [median], p = 0.013) and treatment. Biomarkers decreased significantly with emricasan at week 24 but returned to baseline levels by week 48. New or worsening decompensating events (∼10% over median exposure of 337 days), progression in model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Pugh scores, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar among treatment groups. Conclusions Despite a reduction in biomarkers indicating target engagement, emricasan was not associated with improvement in HVPG or clinical outcomes in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension. Compensated patients with higher baseline HVPG had evidence of a small treatment effect. Emricasan treatment appeared safe and well-tolerated. Lay summary Cirrhosis (scarring of the liver) is the main consequence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Cirrhosis leads to high pressure in the portal vein which accounts for most of the complications of cirrhosis. Reducing portal pressure is beneficial in patients with cirrhosis. We studied the possibility that emricasan, a drug that improves inflammation and scarring in the liver, would reduce portal pressure in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension. Our results in a large, prospective, double-blind study could not demonstrate a beneficial effect of emricasan in these patients. Clinical Trial Number Clinical Trials.gov #NCT02960204.

Background Recent guidelines have recommended screening for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and case finding of advanced disease with fibrosis in patients with type-2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of commonly used noninvasive scores to predict the presence of advanced fibrosis (AF) in a large cohort of diabetics in real-life settings. Patients and methods Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, all patients with the diagnosis of T2D who had a liver biopsy for suspected NAFLD between January 2000 and December 2015, were identified and analyzed. Patients with secondary causes of hepatic steatosis were excluded. AST/ALT ratio, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, and Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Fibrosis Score (NFS) were calculated to predict advanced disease. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operator curve were calculated and compared with liver biopsies to predict the overall accuracy of each score. Results A total of 1319 patients with T2D underwent liver biopsy for suspected NAFLD. After exclusions, 1,157 subjects were included in the final analysis. Our cohort consisted of 64.6% females and 88.4% were whites. Overall, 85% of the population was overweight or obese (body mass index>25 kg/m). Liver biopsy showed 31.7% with AF [Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH-CRN) stage 3 to 4]. In comparison to liver biopsy, for the diagnosis of AF, AST/ALT>1.4, APRI>1.5, FIB-4>2.67, and NFS>0.676 had reasonable specificities of 84.2%, 97.4%, 69.9%, and 93% but poor sensitivities of 27.4%, 16.5%, 6.7%, and 44.1%, respectively. Even at lower cutoff values of AST/ALT≥1, APRI≥1, and FIB-4≥1.45 sensitivities remained low at 60.7%, 27.9%, and 72.6%, respectively, except for NFS ≥-1.455 with sensitivity of 94.6%, but at this cutoff, its specificity decreased to 16.9%. The area under the receiver operator curve to detect AF was 0.62, 0.74, 0.77, and 0.72, respectively. Conclusions In this large cohort of adult patients with T2D and NAFLD, commonly used fibrosis scores had reasonable specificity, but poor sensitivity for detecting AF in diabetics. The development of reliable biomarkers for NAFLD/NASH in diabetics is urgently needed.

BACKGROUND Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and is characterized by steatosis in the absence of significant alcohol consumption. However, MetS and significant alcohol intake coexist in certain individuals which may lead to the development of BAFLD. AIM To assess the clinical characteristics of patients with both alcoholic and NAFLD (BAFLD) in a large cohort in the United States. METHODS Adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2003-2014 were included. NAFLD was diagnosed based on elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and being overweight or obese in the absence of other liver diseases. BAFLD patients met the criteria for NAFLD but also had either MetS or type 2 diabetes and consumed excessive amounts of alcohol. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to assess differences between NAFLD and BAFLD and to compare severity based on a validated fibrosis score (FIB4 index). RESULTS The prevalence of NAFLD was at 25.9% (95%CI; 25.1-26.8) and that of BAFLD was 0.84% (0.67, 1.02) which corresponds to an estimated 1.24 million Americans affected by BAFLD. Compared to NAFLD, patients with BAFLD were more likely to be male, smokers, have higher ALT, aspartate aminotransferase, triglycerides, and lower platelets; P < 0.01 for all. More importantly, after adjusting for MetS components, BAFLD patients were significantly more likely to have advanced fibrosis [adjusted OR (95%CI) based on FIB4 index > 2.67 was 3.2 (1.4, 7.0), P = 0.004]. CONCLUSION A significant percentage of the American general population is afflicted by BAFLD and these patients tend to have more advanced liver fibrosis.

Background Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. EDP-514 is a potent core inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) that reduces viral load reduction in HBV-infected chimeric mice. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of EDP-514 in healthy subjects and antiviral activity in patients with CHB. Methods In Part 1, 82 subjects received placebo or EDP-514 in fed or fasted state as single ascending doses of 50–800 mg and multiple ascending doses of 200–800 mg for 14 days. In Part 2, 24 HBV DNA-suppressed, nucleos(t)ide (NUC)-treated (i.e., NUC-suppressed) CHB patients received EDP-514 200–800 mg or placebo for 28 days. Results EDP-514 was well tolerated in healthy subjects and CHB patients with most adverse events of mild intensity. In Part 1, EDP-514 exposure increased in an approximately dose proportional manner up to 600 mg after single doses and up to 400 mg after 14-day dosing. In Part 2, EDP-514 exposure increased linearly with dose on Day 1 and Day 28, with some accumulation for Day 28 and median trough concentrations (Ctrough) approximately 20-fold above the protein-adjusted 50% effective concentration (EC50) for the dose range. Mean change in HBV RNA from baseline to Day 28 was −2.03, −1.67, −1.87, and −0.58 log U/mL in the 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, and placebo CHB groups, respectively. Conclusions EDP-514 was well tolerated, had a PK profile supporting once daily dosing, and reduced HBV RNA levels in NUC-suppressed CHB patients.

Background & Aims EDP-305 is an oral farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist under development for treating nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of EDP-305 was evaluated in a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Methods Non-cirrhotic patients with fibrotic NASH diagnosed by historical biopsy or phenotypically (high body mass index, diagnosis of diabetes (type 2 diabetes/prediabetes), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) with liver fat content >8% by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), were randomized to EDP-305 1 mg, EDP-305 2.5 mg, or placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline to Week 12 for ALT, and the key secondary endpoint was mean change from baseline to Week 12 in liver fat content. Results Between January 2018 and July 2019, 134 patients were randomized and 132 were evaluated. At Week 12, least squares (LS) mean reduction from baseline for ALT for patients receiving 2.5 mg EDP-305 and 1 mg EDP-305 was -27.9 U/L (95% CI 0.03 to 24.9; p=0.049) and -21.7 U/L (-5.8 to 18.3: p=0.304), respectively, compared to -15.4 U/L for those receiving placebo. Absolute liver fat reduction was -7.1% (2.0-7.5; p=0.0009) with 2.5 mg EDP-305, -3.3% with EDP-305 1 mg, and -2.4% with placebo. The most common (≥5%) adverse events were pruritus, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, and dizziness. Pruritus occurred in 50.9%, 9.1%, and 4.2% of patients in the 2.5 mg, 1 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, and 20.8% of patients in the 2.5 mg group and 1.8% in the 1 mg group discontinued. Conclusions EDP-305 reduced ALT levels and MRI-PDFF supporting development of EDP-305 in patients with NASH in a longer-term trial assessing liver histology. LAY SUMMARY Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic hepatic diseases that progresses to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), leading to an increased risk of cirrhosis and the need for liver transplant. Results from this Phase 2 study support continued development of EDP-305, an oral farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist, for the treatment of patients with NASH. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03421431

Background & aims Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic and severe form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease that can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Although NASH has no approved treatments, obeticholic acid (OCA), a synthetic bile acid and farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist, was shown to improve histological features of NASH and fibrosis. Considering that FXR activation influences plasma lipoprotein concentrations, the Combination OCA aNd sTatins for monitoRing Of Lipids (CONTROL) study evaluated how statins can regulate lipoprotein metabolism with OCA treatment in patients with NASH. Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study began with a 5-week screening/statin washout; 84 patients with NASH were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive placebo or 5 mg, 10 mg or 25 mg OCA once daily during the 16-week double-blind phase. Concurrent once daily atorvastatin (10 mg/days) was initiated at Week 4 with subsequent titration. Enrolled patients had biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of NASH with no evidence of hepatic decompensation. Plasma was collected to analyse lipoprotein parameters. Results At Week 4, all OCA groups had an increase from baseline in mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) and mean LDL particle concentration (LDLpc), mostly owing to large, less atherogenic LDLc particles. Atorvastatin 10 mg decreased LDLc and LDLpc levels below baseline in all OCA groups by Week 8; higher doses did not provide additional clinical benefits. Conclusions The CONTROL study showed that OCA-induced increases in LDLc in patients with NASH were mitigated with atorvastatin. The combination of OCA and atorvastatin was generally safe and well tolerated (NCT02633956).

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common form of chronic liver disease worldwide, and its aggressive form of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is becoming a leading cause for end-stage liver disease and liver transplantation in the United States. In patients with NASH, the presence of advanced fibrosis is considered the most important prognostic factor in predicting liver-related morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, there are no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications to treat patients with NASH-induced advanced fibrosis. However, the field of drug development to treat NASH and fibrosis has witnessed major advances over the past 5 years with several medications in phase III trials. Results from some of these trials are expected in 2019 with potential FDA approval in 2020. Clinicians who treat patients with NAFLD are likely to face several challenges over the next few years related to identifying patients with advanced fibrosis who may derive most benefit from pharmacologic treatment, the requirement for liver biopsy to assess histologic severity and response to treatment, and the urgent need to validate noninvasive tests to replace liver biopsy-to determine treatment initiation, response, futility, and the need for combination therapy with multiple drugs. Conclusion: In this review, we aim to dissect each of these challenges and attempt to provide suggested solutions while fully realizing that knowledge gaps still exist where future research is likely to provide urgently needed answers.

This study characterized the effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, two direct-acting antivirals used for treatment of chronic HCV infection. HCV-negative subjects with normal hepatic function, or with mild (Child-Pugh [CP]-A), moderate (CP-B), or severe (CP-C) hepatic impairment received single doses of pibrentasvir 120 mg alone or with glecaprevir 200 mg or 300 mg (n = 6/functional group/dose). Plasma pharmacokinetics and protein binding were evaluated. Doses were separated by ≥ 14 days of washout. For the approved combination of glecaprevir 300 mg with pibrentasvir 120 mg, glecaprevir AUC was increased by 33% (CP-A), to 2.0-fold (CP-B), and to 11-fold (CP-C) relative to normal subjects; pibrentasvir AUC was ≤ 26% different (CP-A or CP-B) and increased to 2.1-fold (CP-C). For glecaprevir 200 mg with pibrentasvir 120 mg, glecaprevir AUC was increased by 80% (CP-A) or to 2.8-fold (CP-B), while pibrentasvir AUC was unaffected in the same subjects (≤ 12% difference). Pibrentasvir 120 mg alone AUC increased 51% (CP-A), 31% (CP-B), and to 5.2-fold (CP-C). The unbound fraction of glecaprevir was higher in CP-C subjects than normal subjects and pibrentasvir protein binding was similar across groups. The most common adverse event was headache; no events were serious. This study supported evaluation of the glecaprevir 300 mg with pibrentasvir 120-mg combination in HCV-infected subjects with CP-A hepatic impairment without dose adjustment. Elevated glecaprevir and/or pibrentasvir exposures are expected in HCV-infected patients with CP-B or CP-C hepatic impairment.

Background & Aims Lysyl oxidase-like 2 contributes to fibrogenesis by catalyzing cross-linkage of collagen. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of simtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody against lysyl oxidase-like 2, in two phase 2b trials of patients with advanced fibrosis caused by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Methods We performed a double-blind study of 219 patients with bridging fibrosis caused by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to groups given weekly subcutaneous injections of simtuzumab (75 or 125 mg) or placebo for a planned duration of 240 weeks. We performed a separate study of 258 patients with compensated cirrhosis randomly assigned (1:1:1) to groups given intravenous infusions of simtuzumab (200 or 700 mg) or placebo every other week. The studies were performed from January 2013 through July 2014 at 80 sites in North America and Europe. Biopsy specimens were collected and analyzed at screening and at weeks 48 and 96; clinical information and serum levels of fibrosis biomarkers were collected throughout the study. The primary end point was change from baseline to week 96 in hepatic collagen content, measured by morphometry of liver specimens, in patients with bridging fibrosis; for patients with cirrhosis, the primary end point was change in hepatic venous pressure gradient from baseline to week 96. Results The 2 studies were stopped after week 96 because of lack of efficacy. All 3 groups of patients with bridging fibrosis—including those given placebo—had significant decreases in hepatic collagen content, but there was no statistically significant difference in decrease between patients receiving simtuzumab 75 mg and those receiving placebo (−0.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.3 to 1.0, P = .77) or between patients receiving simtuzumab 125 mg and those receiving placebo (−0.4%, 95% CI −1.5 to 0.8, P = .52). In patients with cirrhosis, the mean difference in hepatic venous pressure gradient between the 2 simtuzumab groups and the placebo group was 0.1 mm Hg (95% CI −1.2 to 1.5, P = .84 for 200 mg; 95% CI −1.2 to 1.4, P = .88 for 700 mg). Simtuzumab did not significantly decrease fibrosis stage, progression to cirrhosis in patients with bridging fibrosis, or liver-related clinical events in patients with cirrhosis. Rates of adverse events were similar among groups. Conclusion In two phase 2b trials of patients with bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, simtuzumab was ineffective in decreasing hepatic collagen content or hepatic venous pressure gradient, respectively. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01672866 and NCT01672879.

Background: FGF21 is an endogenous hormone that regulates carbohydrate, lipid and energy metabolism. FGF21 analogs improve liver and metabolic abnormalities in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). BIO89-100 is a long-acting glycoPEGylated FGF21, with promising tolerability and pharmacodynamic effects and potential for QW or Q2W dosing. Methods: This Phase 1b/2a trial enrolled 81 subjects with liver fat ≥10% by MRI-PDFF and either biopsy-confirmed NASH (BC-NASH) or phenotypic NASH (PNASH: central obesity with either type 2 diabetes mellitus or with evidence of liver injury by ALT or FibroScan vibration controlled transient elastography score above defined thresholds). Subjects were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment at one of 6 doses (3, 9, 18 or 27mg weekly [QW]; 18 or 36mg Q2W) or placebo. Key endpoints were safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, change in liver fat content as measured by MRI-PDFF and liver and metabolic markers. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally similar between pooled BIO89-100 v. pooled placebo groups, and between BC-NASH v. PNASH subjects. At week 13, all BIO89-100 dose groups showed significant relative reductions up to 70% (placebo adjusted p45 U/L (35 U/L decrease from baseline, p

Background: ELF score is a non-invasive assessment for NASH fibrosis. We assessed associations between ELF, clinical outcomes and PROs in advanced NASH. Methods: NASH patients with advanced fibrosis (Stage ≥F3) were enrolled in 4 clinical trials of simtuzumab and selonsertib - neither showed efficacy. Liver biopsies, ELF scores, and PROs were collected at baseline and week 48. Disease progression (histologic progression to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, listed for or liver transplanted, death) was monitored over time (median 16 months; IQR 14-20 months). Results: Patients (n=2155) with biopsy-proven advanced NASH [ 52.5% F4, 40% male, 78% white, 72% type 2 diabetes, mean baseline ELF 10.4±1.1 (F4: 11.4±1.2 vs. F3: 10.3±1.0, p Conclusions: ELF at baseline and its changes over time are good predictors of adverse clinical and PROs in advanced NASH. Disclosure Z. Younossi: Consultant; Self; AbbVie Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Terns and Viking. Q. Anstee: Consultant; Self; 89Bio, Abbott Laboratories, Acuitas Medical, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Blade, BNN Cardio, Celgene, Cirius, CymaBay, EcoR1, E3Bio, Eli Lilly & Company Ltd., Galmed, Genentech, Genfit S, Intercept Pharma Europe Ltd., Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, MedImmune, Metacrine, NewGene, NGMBio, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Ltd., Poxel, ProSciento, Raptor Pha. Research Support; Self; Abbvie, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Ltd., Vertex. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Fishawack, Genfit SA, Gilead, Integritas Communications, Kenes, MedScape. M. Trauner: Advisory Panel; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Research Support; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other Relationship; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. V.W.S. Wong: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. Consultant; Self; AbbVie Inc., Allergan plc., Echosens, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk Inc., Pfizer Inc. M. Camargo: Employee; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. L. Henry: None. M. Stepanova: None. M. Romero-Gomez: Consultant; Self; Kaleido Biosciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Siemens Corporation, Zydus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. E. Lawitz: None. R. Myers: None. Funding Gilead Sciences Foundation

Background: PROs of NASH patients have not been fully assessed. We assessed the impact of fatigue and pruritus on PROs of patients with advanced NASH. Methods: Baseline PROs including fatigue and pruritis (SF-36, CLDQ-NASH, EQ-5D, and WPAI instruments) were collected from patients with biopsy-proven NASH and advanced fibrosis (stage≥F3). Results: Fatigue (33%) and pruritus (27%) were reported among NASH patients (n=1,669; mean age 58±9 years, 48% F3, 42% psychiatric comorbidities). Fatigued patients were younger, female, cirrhotic, diabetic with higher BMI and more comorbidities (all p Conclusion: One-third of patients with advanced NASH have fatigue and pruritus which negatively impact their PROs. Disclosure Z. Younossi: Consultant; Self; AbbVie Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Terns and Viking. Q. Anstee: Consultant; Self; 89Bio, Abbott Laboratories, Acuitas Medical, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Blade, BNN Cardio, Celgene, Cirius, CymaBay, EcoR1, E3Bio, Eli Lilly & Company Ltd., Galmed, Genentech, Genfit S, Intercept Pharma Europe Ltd., Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, MedImmune, Metacrine, NewGene, NGMBio, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Ltd., Poxel, ProSciento, Raptor Pha. Research Support; Self; Abbvie, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Ltd., Vertex. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Fishawack, Genfit SA, Gilead, Integritas Communications, Kenes, MedScape. V.W.S. Wong: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. Consultant; Self; AbbVie Inc., Allergan plc., Echosens, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk Inc., Pfizer Inc. M. Trauner: Advisory Panel; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Research Support; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other Relationship; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. M. Camargo: Employee; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Z. Goodman: None. L. Henry: None. M. Stepanova: None. M. Romero-Gomez: Consultant; Self; Kaleido Biosciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Siemens Corporation, Zydus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. R. Myers: None. E. Lawitz: None. Funding Gilead Sciences Foundation

Background & Aims Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is a leading cause of end-stage liver disease. Hepatic steatosis and lipotoxicity cause chronic necroinflammation and direct hepatocellular injury resulting in cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Emricasan is a pan-caspase inhibitor that inhibits excessive apoptosis and inflammation; it has also been shown to decrease portal pressure and improve synthetic function in mice with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis. Methods This double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized 217 individuals with decompensated NASH cirrhosis 1:1:1 to emricasan (5 mg or 25 mg) or placebo. Patients were stratified by decompensation status and baseline model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score. The primary endpoint comprised all-cause mortality, a new decompensation event (new or recurrent variceal hemorrhage, new ascites requiring diuretics, new unprecipitated hepatic encephalopathy ≥grade 2, hepatorenal syndrome, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis), or an increase in MELD-Na score ≥4 points. Results There was no difference in event rates between either of the emricasan treatment groups and placebo, with hazard ratios of 1.02 (95% CI 0.59–1.77; p = 0.94) and 1.28 (95% CI 0.75–2.21; p = 0.37) for 5 mg and 25 mg of emricasan, respectively. MELD-Na score progression was the most common outcome. There was no significant effect of emricasan treatment on MELD-Na score, international normalized ratio, total serum bilirubin, albumin level or Child-Pugh score. Emricasan was generally safe and well-tolerated. Conclusions Emricasan was safe but ineffective for the treatment of decompensated NASH cirrhosis. However, this study may guide the design and conduct of future clinical trials in decompensated NASH cirrhosis. Lay summary Patients with decompensated cirrhosis related to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis are at high risk of additional decompensation events and death. Post hoc analyses in previous pilot studies suggested that emricasan might improve portal hypertension and liver function. In this larger randomized study, emricasan did not decrease the number of decompensation events or improve liver function in patients with a history of decompensated cirrhosis related to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03205345 .

Background and aims Direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have resulted in high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) following 8 to 24 weeks of treatment. However, difficult‐to‐cure/cirrhotic patients typically require a longer treatment duration and less is known regarding the long‐term durability of SVR or effect on liver disease progression; to assess this, the IMPACT study followed patients for a 3‐year period after end of treatment. Methods The Phase II, open‐label, nonrandomized IMPACT study assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of three DAAs (simeprevir, sofosbuvir, and daclatasvir) in HCV genotype 1/4‐infected, treatment‐naïve/‐experienced cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension or decompensated liver disease. Patients from a single site in the United States were assigned to one of two groups by Child–Pugh (CP) score: CP A, CP score less than 7 and evidence of portal hypertension; CP B, CP score of 7 to 9. All patients received simeprevir 150 mg, daclatasvir 60 mg, and sofosbuvir 400 mg once‐daily for 12 weeks between September 2014 and August 2015. All 40 patients included in the study (male, 63%; median age, 58.5 years) achieved SVR 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment, and the combination was well tolerated. Results All patients who reached the 3‐year follow‐up timepoint maintained SVR (CP A, 15/15; CP B, 18/18). CP scores and Model for End‐stage Liver Disease scores remained relatively stable, and mean FibroScan and FibroTest scores declined. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions In the IMPACT study, virologic response to simeprevir, sofosbuvir, and daclatasvir was durable over 3 years (http://ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02262728).

Accurate noninvasive tests (NITs) are needed to replace liver biopsy for identifying advanced fibrosis caused by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We analyzed screening data from two phase 3 trials of selonsertib to assess the ability of NITs to discriminate advanced fibrosis. Centrally read biopsies from the STELLAR studies, which enrolled patients with bridging fibrosis and compensated cirrhosis, were staged according to the NASH Clinical Research Network classification. We explored associations between fibrosis stage and NITs, including the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) index, Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test, and liver stiffness by vibration‐controlled transient elastography (LS by VCTE). The performance of these tests to discriminate advanced fibrosis, either alone or in combinations, was evaluated using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) with 5‐fold cross‐validation repeated 100 times. Of the 4,404 patients screened for these trials, 3,202 had evaluable biopsy data: 940 with F0‐F2 fibrosis and 2,262 with F3‐F4 fibrosis. Significant differences between median values of NITs for patients with F0‐F2 versus F3‐F4 fibrosis were observed: −0.972 versus 0.318 for NFS, 1.18 versus 2.20 for FIB‐4, 9.22 versus 10.39 for ELF, and 8.8 versus 16.5 kPa for LS by VCTE (all P < 0.001). AUROCs ranged from 0.75 to 0.80 to discriminate advanced fibrosis. FIB‐4 followed by an LS by VCTE or ELF test in those with indeterminate values (FIB‐4 between 1.3 and 2.67) maintained an acceptable performance while reducing the rate of indeterminate results. Conclusion: Among patients being considered for enrollment into clinical trials, NITs alone or in combination can reduce the need for liver biopsy to discriminate advanced fibrosis caused by NASH. The predictive value of these tests for general screening will require confirmation in a real‐world population.

Background & Aims Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) plays a key role in hepatocyte injury, inflammation, and fibrosis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We evaluated the safety and antifibrotic effect of selonsertib, a selective inhibitor of ASK1, in patients with advanced fibrosis due to NASH. Methods We conducted 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials of selonsertib in patients with NASH and bridging fibrosis (F3, STELLAR-3) or compensated cirrhosis (F4, STELLAR-4). Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to receive selonsertib 18 mg, selonsertib 6 mg, or placebo once daily for 48 weeks. Liver biopsies were performed at screening and week 48 and non-invasive tests of fibrosis (NITs) were evaluated. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥1-stage improvement in fibrosis without worsening of NASH at week 48. Additional endpoints included changes in NITs, progression to cirrhosis (in STELLAR-3), and liver-related clinical events. Results Neither trial met the primary efficacy endpoint. In STELLAR-3, fibrosis improvement without worsening of NASH was observed in 10% (31/322, p = 0.49 vs. placebo), 12% (39/321, p = 0.93 vs. placebo), and 13% (21/159) of patients in the selonsertib 18 mg, selonsertib 6 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. In STELLAR-4, the primary endpoint was achieved in 14% (51/354; p = 0.56), 13% (45/351; p = 0.93), and 13% (22/172) of patients, respectively. Although selonsertib led to dose-dependent reductions in hepatic phospho-p38 expression indicative of pharmacodynamic activity, it had no significant effect on liver biochemistry, NITs, progression to cirrhosis, or adjudicated clinical events. The rates and types of adverse events were similar among selonsertib and placebo groups. Conclusions Forty-eight weeks of selonsertib monotherapy had no antifibrotic effect in patients with bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis due to NASH. Lay summary Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) can develop scarring of the liver (fibrosis), including cirrhosis, which increases the risks of liver failure and liver cancer. We tested whether 48 weeks of treatment with selonsertib reduced fibrosis in patients with NASH and advanced liver scarring. We did not find that selonsertib reduced fibrosis in these patients. Trial registration details Clinicaltrials.gov numbers NCT03053050 and NCT03053063.

The pharmacokinetics and safety of velpatasvir, a potent pangenotypic hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor, were evaluated in two hepatic impairment studies: a phase I study in hepatitis C virus-uninfected subjects and a phase III study (ASTRAL-4) in hepatitis C virus-infected patients. In the phase I study, subjects with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class B or C), and demographically matched subjects with normal hepatic function received a single dose of velpatasvir 100 mg. Pharmacokinetics and safety assessments were performed, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics and compared statistically by geometric least-squares mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals. In ASTRAL-4, subjects with decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class B) were randomized to receive treatment with either sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ± ribavirin for 12 weeks or sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 24 weeks. Pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were performed and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental analysis and summarized using descriptive statistics and were compared to pharmacokinetics from ASTRAL-1 [subjects without cirrhosis or with compensated (Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class A) cirrhosis]. In the phase I study, plasma exposures (area under the concentration–time curve) were similar in subjects with Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class B (n = 10) or Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class C hepatic impairment (n = 10) compared with normal hepatic function (n = 13). Percent free velpatasvir was similar in subjects without or with any degree of hepatic impairment. In the phase III study, velpatasvir overall exposure (area under the concentration–time curve over the 24-h dosing interval; AUCtau) was similar and sofosbuvir exposures were higher (~ 100%) for patients with Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class B hepatic impairment compared with the ASTRAL-1 population, which was not considered clinically relevant. No sofosbuvir/velpatasvir dose modification is warranted for patients with any degree of hepatic impairment.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) represent patients' perspective about their well-being.To assess PRO changes in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) after treatment with selonsertib (SEL) and to associate them with different biomarkers.Patients with NASH and stage 2-3 fibrosis received SEL 6 mg or 18 mg orally QD alone or in combination with simtuzumab (SIM, 125 mg SC weekly) or SIM alone for 24 weeks. Biopsies were obtained at baseline and at treatment week 24. PROs were assessed using SF-36, CLDQ and WPAI:SHP.Seventy-two patients with NASH were included (54 ± 10 years, 31% male, 65% stage 3, 71% diabetes). Baseline physical health-related PRO scores were significantly lower than population norms (P .05). During treatment, there were no consistent differences in treatment-emergent PRO changes between different regimens (P .05). However, NASH subjects who experienced ≥2 decrease in NAFLD Activity Score or ≥1-stage reduction in fibrosis showed significant improvements in their PROs (up to +15.5% of a PRO range size, P .05). Additionally, improvements in PROs (up to +21.5%, P .05) were noted in patients with at least 50% relative reduction in collagen, while NASH subjects with17% increase in their collagen experienced PRO worsening (up to -13.9%, P .05). Baseline serum CK-18, IL-6 and CRP significantly correlated with PROs (rho from -0.24 to -0.38, P .05).A decrease in hepatic collagen is the most prominently associated with improvement of PROs in NASH patients with F2-F3 treated with SEL. Furthermore, serum cytokines are associated with baseline PROs and with treatment-emergent changes in PROs in patients with NASH.

The phase 2, open-label ACCORDION (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02349048) study investigated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of a 6- or 8-week regimen of simeprevir, daclatasvir and sofosbuvir in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 infection and either early-stage fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis. Patients were assigned to treatment groups according to their fibrosis stage. Early-stage fibrosis: simeprevir 150 mg, daclatasvir 60 mg, sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 6 weeks; compensated cirrhosis: same regimen for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of simeprevir, daclatasvir and sofosbuvir were investigated. Sixty-eight patients were treated (6-week group: n = 59; 8-week group: n = 9). SVR12 was achieved by 86.4% (51/59) of patients with early-stage fibrosis and by 100% (9/9) of patients with cirrhosis. The main reason for not achieving SVR12 in the 6-week group was viral relapse (11.9%; 7/59). One patient had on-treatment failure due to an early withdrawal (lost to follow-up due to incarceration). One patient with SVR12 in the 6-week group had a late viral relapse at post-treatment week 24. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions were observed. Adverse events were reported in 63.2% of patients (43/68) and were mainly grade 1/2. None of these led to treatment discontinuation. The 3 direct-acting antiviral regimens of simeprevir, daclatasvir and sofosbuvir were safe and well tolerated in treatment-naïve, HCV GT1-infected patients with early-stage fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis.

Inhibition of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1, a serine/threonine kinase, leads to improvement in inflammation and fibrosis in animal models of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of selonsertib, a selective inhibitor of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1, alone or in combination with simtuzumab, in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and stage 2 or 3 liver fibrosis. In this multicenter phase 2 trial, 72 patients were randomized to receive 24 weeks of open-label treatment with either 6 or 18 mg of selonsertib orally once daily with or without once-weekly injections of 125 mg of simtuzumab or simtuzumab alone. The effect of treatment was assessed by paired pretreatment and posttreatment liver biopsies, magnetic resonance elastography, magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction, quantitative collagen content, and noninvasive markers of liver injury. Due to the lack of effect of simtuzumab on histology or selonsertib pharmacokinetics, selonsertib groups with and without simtuzumab were pooled. After 24 weeks of treatment, the proportion of patients with a one or more stage reduction in fibrosis in the 18-mg selonsertib group was 13 of 30 (43%; 95% confidence interval, 26-63); in the 6-mg selonsertib group, 8 of 27 (30%; 95% confidence interval, 14-50); and in the simtuzumab-alone group, 2 of 10 (20%; 95% confidence interval, 3-56). Improvement in fibrosis was associated with reductions in liver stiffness on magnetic resonance elastography, collagen content and lobular inflammation on liver biopsy, as well as improvements in serum biomarkers of apoptosis and necrosis. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the treatment groups. Conclusion: These findings suggest that selonsertib may reduce liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and stage 2-3 fibrosis. (Hepatology 2018;67:549-559).

INTRODUCTION Glecaprevir (formerly ABT-493, pangenotypic NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and pibrentasvir (formerly ABT-530, pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor) are second generation direct acting antivirals (DAA) for the treatment of chronic Hepatitis C (HCV). It is a fixed dose ribavirin (RBV)-free regimen with activity against genotypes (GT) 1-6. In vitro the two antivirals have synergistic activity with a high barrier to resistance and potent activity against common polymorphisms. It is once daily oral dosing with minimal absorption, primary biliary excretion, and negligible renal excretion, making it safe for patients with renal impairment. This regimen is being reviewed because it is the first pangenotypic regimen suitable for those with renal impairment and prior DAA failure. Areas covered: The key phase 2 and 3 trials which investigated the efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir are reviewed by methodology, primary end point, baseline demographic data, response rates, and adverse events. Literature search methodology involved reviewing key abstracts presented at the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and European Association for the Study of Liver. Expert commentary: The advantages and limitations of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir will be reviewed in comparison to its competitor drug on the market.