Search

Background and Aims Thromboprophylaxis use in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is inconsistent. Current guidelines only support treating children with acute severe colitis with risk factors. We convened an international RAND panel to explore thromboprophylaxis in paediatric IBD inpatients in the context of new evidence. Methods We convened a geographically diverse 14-person panel of paediatric gastroenterologists alongside supporting experts. An online survey was sent before an online meeting. Panellists were asked to rate the appropriateness of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised paediatric IBD patients via 27 scenarios of varying ages, gender, and phenotype, with and without thrombotic risk factors. Anonymised results were presented at the meeting. A second modified survey was distributed to all panellists present at the meeting. Results from the second survey constitute the RAND panel results. The validated RAND disagreement index defined disagreement when ≥ 1. Results The combined outcome of thromboprophylaxis being considered appropriate until discharge and inappropriate to withhold was seen in 20 of 27 scenarios, including: all patients with new-onset acute severe colitis; all flares of known ulcerative colitis, irrespective of risk factors except in pre-pubescent patients with limited disease and no risk factors; and all Crohn’s patients with risk factors. Disagreement was seen in five scenarios regarding Crohn’s without risk factors, where outcomes were already uncertain. Conclusions RAND panels are an established method to assess expert opinion in areas of limited evidence. This work therefore constitutes neither a guideline nor a consensus; however, the findings suggest a need to re-evaluate the role of thromboprophylaxis in future guidelines.

Background and Aims Corticosteroid-free remission is a primary treatment goal in IBD which may be achieved with greater use of anti-TNF therapy. We defined temporal trends of corticosteroid use, anti-TNF use, hospitalization and surgery in a prevalent IBD cohort within the province of Alberta, Canada. Methods Health administrative data were used to identify medication dispensing, hospitalizations and surgery in individuals with IBD from 2010 to 2015. Temporal trends were calculated using log-binomial regression for medications and log-linear models for hospitalizations and surgery rates. Analyses were stratified based on geographic location. Results Of 28890 individuals with IBD, 50.3% had Crohn’s disease. One in six individuals (15.45%) were dispensed a corticosteroid. Corticosteroid use decreased in both metropolitan areas (AAPC −20.08%, 95% CI: −21.78 to −18.04) and non-metropolitan areas (AAPC −18.14%, 95% CI: −20.78 to −18.04) with a similar pattern for corticosteroid dependence. Corticosteroid dependence was more prevalent in UC vs. CD (P < 0.05), and in the pediatric IBD cohort (13.45) compared to the adult (8.89) and elderly (7.54) cohorts (per 100 prevalent population, P < 0.001). The proportion of individuals dispensed an anti-TNF increased over the study period (AAPC 12.58%, 95% CI: 11.56 to 13.61). Significantly more non-metropolitan versus metropolitan residing individuals were hospitalized for any reason, for an IBD-related, or IBD-specific indication (all P < 0.001) though the proportion requiring IBD surgery was similar between groups. Conclusions An increase in anti-TNF use corresponded to a decline in corticosteroid use and dependence in those with IBD. Inequities in IBD care still exist based on location and age.

Several studies have demonstrated higher rates of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a population-based study comparing the risk of hospitalization with CDI in children with and without IBD.Using health administrative data and validated algorithms, we identified all children (16 years) diagnosed with IBD in 5 Canadian provinces, then age and sex matched to 5 children without IBD. Province-specific 5-year incidence rates of hospitalization with CDI were pooled and generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the crude incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing (1) children with and without IBD and (2) children with Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis. Hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age, sex, rural/urban household, and income were pooled using fixed-effects models.The incidence rate of CDI identified during hospitalization was 49.06 [95% confidence interval (CI), 39.40-61.08] per 10,000 person-years (PY) in 3593 children with IBD compared to 0.39 (95% CI, 0.13-1.21) per 10,000 PY in 16,284 children without IBD (crude IRR, 133.4, 95% CI, 42.1-422.7; adjusted HR, 68.2, 95% CI, 24.4-190.4). CDI was identified less often in children with Crohn disease than ulcerative colitis (crude IRR, 0.51, 95% CI, 0.32-0.82; adjusted HR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.46-1.05).Children with IBD have a markedly higher incidence of CDI identified during a hospitalization relative to children without IBD. Consequently, symptomatic children with IBD who are hospitalized should be screened for CDI.

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is becoming increasingly common around the world, rapidly accelerating in regions undergoing rapid economic development. IBD is more common among those living in cities, and the association between the urban environment and IBD incidence is strongest in children. The "urban exposome" is defined as the totality of environmental exposures associated with urban living: air pollution, water contamination, green and blue space, nighttime light, noise, and availability of pre-processed and packaged foods. Investigation of the role of the urban exposome and IBD is in its infancy. Existing research has reached heterogeneous conclusions, and most studies have focused specifically on adult-onset disease and environmental exposures in isolation rather than the interaction between exposures. By better understanding the impact of the urban exposome on pediatric IBD, we can work to minimize these exposures and decrease the future burden of IBD in children.

Objectives MR enterography (MRE) Index of Activity (MaRIA) and Clermont are validated scores that correlate with Crohn’s disease (CD) activity; however, the Clermont score has not been validated to correlate with the degree of change in mucosal inflammation post induction treatment in children. This pilot study evaluated if MaRIA and Clermont scores can serve as surrogates to ileocolonoscopy for assessing interval change in mucosal inflammation in pediatric CD post-induction treatment. Methods Children with known or newly diagnosed ileocolonic CD starting or changing therapy underwent ileocolonoscopy, scored with simple endoscopic score for Crohn’s disease (SES-CD), and MRE on the same day at two time points (Week 0 and 12). Accuracy of global MaRIA and Clermont indices relative to ileocolonoscopy in detecting degree of post-treatment interval change in mucosal inflammation was assessed through correlational coefficients (r). Inter-reader agreement was calculated for imaging scores through intraclass correlation (ICC). Results Sixteen children (mean age 11.5 ± 2.8) were evaluated. Global MaRIA/Clermont correlated with SES-CD in detecting the degree of change in mucosal inflammation (r = 0.676 and r = 0.677, P < 0.005, respectively). Correlation for pooled timepoint assessments between SES-CD and global MaRIA/Clermont was moderate (r = 0.546, P < 0.001 and r = 0.582, P < 0.001, respectively). Inter-rater reliability for global MaRIA and Clermont was good (ICC = 0.809 and ICC = 0.768, respectively, P < 0.001). Conclusions MRE-based global scores correlate with endoscopic indices and may be used to monitor disease changes in children with CD undergoing induction treatment, which can advise the physician if treatment changes should be made.

Background Recent advances in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) striving for new treatment targets may have decreased rates of hospitalization for flares. We compared all-cause, IBD-related, and non-IBD-related hospitalizations while accounting for the rising prevalence of IBD. Methods Population-based, administrative health care databases identified all individuals living with IBD in Alberta between fiscal year 2002 and 2018. Hospitalization rates (all-cause, IBD-related, and non-IBD-related) were calculated using the prevalent Alberta IBD population. Hospitalizations were stratified by disease type, age, sex, and metropolitan status. Data were age and sex standardized to the 2019 Canadian population. Log-linear models calculated Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC) in hospitalization rates with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results From 2002-2003 to 2018-2019, all-cause hospitalization rates decreased from 36.57 to 16.72 per 100 IBD patients (AAPC, −4.18%; 95% CI, −4.69 to −3.66). Inflammatory bowel disease–related hospitalization rate decreased from 26.44 to 9.24 per 100 IBD patients (AAPC, −5.54%; 95% CI, −6.19 to −4.88). Non-IBD-related hospitalization rate decreased from 10.13 to 7.48 per 100 IBD patients (AAPC, −1.82%; 95% CI, −2.14 to −1.49). Those over 80 years old had the greatest all-cause and non-IBD-related hospitalization rates. Temporal trends showing decreasing hospitalization rates were observed across age, sex, IBD type, and metropolitan status. Conclusions Hospitalization rates are decreasing for all-cause, IBD-related, and non-IBD-related hospitalizations. Over the past 20 years, the care of IBD has transitioned from hospital-based care to ambulatory-centric IBD management.

Background Diagnosis of monogenic disease is increasingly important for patient care and personalizing therapy. However, the current process is non-standardized, expensive, and time consuming. There is currently no accepted strategy to help identify disease-causing variants in monogenic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aims To develop a prioritization strategy for monogenic IBD variant discovery through detailed analysis of a whole exome sequencing (WES) data set. Methods All consenting pediatric patients with IBD presenting to our tertiary care hospital during the study period were enrolled and underwent WES (n = 1005). Available family members also underwent WES. Variants were analyzed en mass using the GEMINI framework, and were further annotated using data from dbNSFP, CADD, and gnomAD. Known disease-causing variants (n = 36) were used as positive controls. Machine learning algorithms were optimized then compared to assist with identifying monogenic IBD case characteristics. Results Initial gene-level analysis identified 11 genes not previously linked to IBD that could potentially harbour IBD causing variants. Machine learning algorithms identified four primary variant characteristics (CADD score, dbNSFP score, relationship with a known immunodeficiency gene, and alternate allele frequency) and optimal threshold values for each were determined to assist with identifying monogenic IBD variants. Based on these characteristics, an automated variant prioritization pipeline was then created that filters and prioritizes variants from >100,000 variants per patient down to a mean of 15. This pipeline is available online for all to use. Conclusion Leveraging a large WES data set, we demonstrate a statistically rigorous strategy for prioritization of variants for monogenic IBD diagnosis.

The prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, in Canada, is over 0.75% in 2021. Many individuals with IBD are immunocompromised. Consequently, the World Health Organization’s declaration of a global pandemic uniquely impacted those with IBD. Crohn’s and Colitis Canada (CCC) formed the COVID-19 and IBD Taskforce to provide evidence-based guidance during the pandemic to individuals with IBD and their families. The Taskforce met regularly through the course of the pandemic, synthesizing available information on the impact of COVID-19 on IBD. At first, the information was extrapolated from expert consensus guidelines, but eventually, recommendations were adapted for an international registry of worldwide cases of COVID-19 in people with IBD. The task force launched a knowledge translation initiative consisting of a webinar series and online resources to communicate information directly to the IBD community. Taskforce recommendations were posted to CCC’s website and included guidance such as risk stratification, management of immunosuppressant medications, physical distancing, and mental health. A weekly webinar series communicated critical information directly to the IBD community. During the pandemic, traffic to CCC’s website increased with 484,755 unique views of the COVID-19 webpages and 126,187 views of the 23 webinars, including their video clips. CCC’s COVID-19 and IBD Taskforce provided critical guidance to the IBD community as the pandemic emerged, the nation underwent a lockdown, the economy reopened, and the second wave ensued. By integrating public health guidance through the unique prism of a vulnerable population, CCC’s knowledge translation platform informed and protected the IBD community.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a disease that results from dysregulation of the immune system and frequently requires medications that can affect the immune response to infections; therefore, it was imperative to quickly understand the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on persons living with IBD and how that risk may be increased by commonly used IBD medications. The IBD research community in Canada and beyond quickly established collaborative efforts to better understand the specific risk posed by COVID-19 on persons with IBD. We learned that IBD itself was not a risk factor for death or serious complications of COVID-19, and that most commonly used drug classes (with the notable exception of corticosteroids) do not increase the risk of COVID-19-related adverse outcomes. The risk factors for serious complications and death from COVID-19 appear to be similar to those identified in the wider population; those being advanced age, having pre-existing heart or lung disease, and smoking. We recommend that persons with IBD do not alter their course of therapy to avoid complications of COVID-19, though the indiscriminate use of corticosteroids should be avoided. Persons with IBD should follow the same public health recommendations as the general population to reduce their personal risk of acquiring COVID-19.

There has been a dramatic rise in mental health difficulties during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While young adults have the lowest risk of hospitalization and mortality due to COVID-19, they have been identified as being at highest risk of detrimental mental health outcomes during the pandemic, along with women, those with lower socioeconomic status and those with pre-existing mental health conditions. Somewhat of a crisis in mental health has emerged across the general population through the evolution of the pandemic. A national Canadian survey identified a quadrupling of those experiencing pervasive elevated anxiety symptoms early in the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic levels, and a doubling of those with pervasive elevated depressive symptoms. Independent of the pandemic, persons with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can face multiple challenges related to their disease, which can result in a significant psychosocial burden and psychologic distress. Anxiety and depression have been found to be more prevalent in persons with IBD. Many potential factors contribute to the increased psychologic distress and negative impacts on mental health of the COVID-19 pandemic on persons with IBD. These include the fears of contracting COVID-19 or infecting other people. Many believe that IBD or its treatments predispose them to an increased risk of COVID-19 or a worse outcome if acquired. Concerns about access to health care add to mental distress. People with IBD generally report lower quality of life (QOL) compared to community controls. Psychologic interventions, in addition to adequate disease control, have been shown to improve health-related QOL. Uncertainty is another factor associated with reduced health-related QOL. Most studies suggest that persons with IBD have suffered QOL impairment during the pandemic in comparison to the pre-pandemic period. Uncertainties brought on by the pandemic are important contributors for some of the reduction in QOL.

The risk of hospitalization and death from Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) increases with age. The extreme elderly have been particularly vulnerable, with those above the age of 80 having a case-fatality rate as high as 15%. Aging of the immune system can lead to impaired inflammatory responses where eradication of an organism such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) is inadequate but is exaggerated in such a way as to enhance pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Frailty and comorbidity are both more common in the elderly, and these can enhance the morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. Studies from Northern California and Italy suggest that elderly persons with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were more likely to acquire SARS-CoV-2 infection than youths with IBD. While the specific impact of age-related comorbidity is less well established among people with IBD who acquire COVID-19, data from the Surveillance Epidemiology of Coronavirus Under Research Exclusion (SECURE-IBD) database reported that having two or more chronic illnesses was independently associated with developing severe COVID-19 among people with IBD. Despite having exaggerated auto-inflammatory responses, people with IBD do not appear to have an overall increased risk of developing severe COVID-19 than the general population. However, whether seniors with IBD do worse once they acquire COVID-19 compared with seniors without IBD is not known. The advent of telehealth care has posed an information technology challenge for many seniors with and without IBD. Most persons with IBD have expressed satisfaction with virtual IBD health care (phone or video-based visits). While the elderly may have less robust immune responses to vaccinations, learning from experiences with other vaccination programs, especially influenza, have shown that vaccinating seniors decreases both morbidity and mortality and, in turn, healthcare resources.

At the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there were many unknowns: transmission vectors of the virus, appropriate intervention strategies and if being immunocompromised due to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), for example, or medications put a person at increased risk for severe COVID-19. Imposing and relaxing of public health restrictions at different times and in different regions in Canada led to different epidemiologies of the virus in different provinces and territories. In order to understand the waxing and waning of waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to understand the effective reproductive number (Rt) and the countervailing forces that exert upward or downward pressure on the spread of the virus at a given point in time. As many regions in Canada deal with a third wave, the primary forces affecting the Rt of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are variants of concern and the increasing vaccinations of Canadians leading to increased population-level immunity. Fortunately, for the IBD population, current research suggests that those with IBD are not at increased risk of contracting COVID-19, nor of having a more severe disease course when compared to the general population.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) typically results in a mild infection, similar to those without IBD. Children and adolescents have less severe manifestations of COVID-19 compared to older people, whether or not they have IBD. However, some IBD medications (in particular, corticosteroids) are associated with more severe COVID-19. During the first year of the global pandemic, more IBD care was provided with online technology, necessitated by efforts to reduce hospital and clinic visits. Additionally, non-endoscopic monitoring of inflammation has been required due to the cancellation of non-urgent procedures, resulting in longer endoscopy wait-times. In contrast, pregnant people (with and without IBD) who contract COVID-19 are at increased risk of severe manifestations, death and preterm delivery, making them a priority for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 protective measures and vaccination. Few studies have examined effect of COVID-19 on IBD-related disease activity in pregnant people with IBD. The pandemic has significantly affected the mental health and sense of well-being of children and their families, as well as pregnant people with IBD. These groups were much more likely to experience anxiety and depression compared with prior to the pandemic, even while concern has mostly abated regarding the effect of IBD medications and COVID-19 severity. Unfortunately, the availability of mental health care providers who specialize in people with IBD has not kept pace with the increasing demand.

The COVID-19 pandemic has ushered a globally focused vaccine development program that produced multiple successful vaccines within a year. Four SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been approved for use in Canada, using two different technologies, all of which have shown excellent efficacy in reducing the rate of symptomatic COVID-19 infection and 100% efficacy in preventing death from COVID-19. People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), like many others with immune-mediated chronic diseases, were excluded from the pivotal trials of these vaccines, leading to early hesitancy by regulatory bodies to endorse administering the vaccines to these groups. However, recent data has shown that the adverse event rate to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among people with IBD is similar to the general population. Early data has further shown that people with IBD are capable of mounting a robust immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, particularly following a second dose, whereas the response to the first dose is blunted in those receiving anti-TNF therapy or conventional immunosuppressants (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate). Based on these data and evidence from previous vaccine programs among people with IBD, multiple national and international expert panels have recommended that individuals with IBD receive complete vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 as soon as possible.

Jasbir Dhaliwal,1– 6 Meltem Tuna,1 Baiju R Shah,1,7,8 Sanjay Murthy,1,9,10 Emily Herrett,4 Anne M Griffiths,2,3 Eric I Benchimol1– 3,8 1ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; 3Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 4London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; 5Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 6Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 7Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; 8Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 9The Ottawa Hospital IBD Centre, The Ottawa Hospital and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 10Department of Medicine and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaCorrespondence: Jasbir DhaliwalPediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Secondary Appointments in Division of Biomedical Informatics and James M Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USATel +15133789468Email Jasbir.dhaliwal@cchmc.orgBackground: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is now a global disease with incidence increasing throughout Asia.Aim: To determine the incidence of IBD among South Asians and Chinese people residing in Ontario, Canada’s most populous province.Methods: All incident cases of IBD in children (1994– 2015) and adults (1999– 2015) were identified from population-based health administrative data. We classified South Asian and Chinese ethnicity using immigration records and surnames. We determined standardized incidence of IBD and adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) in South Asians and Chinese compared to the general population.Results: Among 16,230,638 people living in Ontario, standardized incidence of IBD per 100,000 person-years was 24.7 (95% CI 24.4– 25.0), compared with 14.6 (95% CI 13.7– 15.5) in 982,472 South Asians and with 5.4 (95% CI 4.8– 5.9) in 764,397 Chinese. The risk of IBD in South Asians was comparable to the general population after adjusting for immigrant status and confounders (aIRR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96– 1.10). South Asians had a lower risk of Crohn’s disease (CD) (aIRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60– 0.77), but a higher risk of ulcerative colitis (UC) (aIRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.34– 1.61). Chinese people had much lower rates of IBD (aIRR 0.24, 95% CI 0.20– 0.28), CD (aIRR 0.21, 95% CI 0.17– 0.26), and UC (aIRR 0.28, 95% CI 0.23– 0.25).Conclusion: Canadians of South Asian ethnicity had a similarly high risk of developing IBD compared to other Canadians, and a higher risk of developing UC, a finding distinct from the Chinese population. Our findings indicate the importance of genetic and environmental risk factors in people of Asian origin who live in the Western world.Keywords: inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, incidence, ethnicity, epidemiology, South Asian, Chinese

When constipation is refractory to first-line interventions, antegrade enema use may be considered. We aimed to assess the impact of this intervention on healthcare utilization.We conducted a population-based, quasi-experimental study with pre-post comparison of the intervention group and a non-equivalent control group using linked clinical and health administrative data from Ontario, Canada. Subjects included children (0-18 years) who underwent antegrade enema initiation from 2007 to 2020 and matched controls (4:1) from the general population. To assess the change in healthcare utilization following antegrade enema initiation, we used negative binomial generalized estimating equations with covariates selected a priori.One hundred thirty-eight subjects met eligibility criteria (appendicostomy = 55 (39.9%); cecostomy tube = 83 (60.1%)) and were matched to 550 controls. There was no significant difference in the change in the rate of hospitalizations (rate ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-1.75), outpatient visits (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.18), or same-day surgical procedures (RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.60-2.43) across cases in 2 years following antegrade enema initiation compared with controls. Cases had an increased rate of emergency department (ED) visits, which was not observed in controls (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.11-1.79), driven in part by device-related complications.Understanding healthcare utilization patterns following antegrade enema initiation allows for effective health system planning and aids medical decision-making. The observed increase in ED visits for device-related complications speaks to the need to improve preventive management to help mitigate emergency care after initiation of antegrade enemas.

In this nationwide study from the Israeli Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Nucleus, we aimed to describe the incidence of very early onset inflammatory bowel diseases (VEOIBDs) with a focus on infantile-onset disease and to compare management and disease course with older children.Data were retrieved from the 4 Israeli Health Maintenance Organizations covering 98% of the population. Pediatric-onset IBD was categorized as follows: adolescent onset (10 to18 y), early onset (6 to10 y), VEOIBD (0 to6 y), toddler onset (2 to6 y), and infantile onset (2 y).A total of 5243 children with 35,469 person-years of follow-up evaluation, were diagnosed with IBD during 2005 to 2020: 4444 (85%) with adolescent onset, 548 (10%) with early onset, and 251 (4.8%) with VEOIBD, of whom 81 (1.5%) had infantile onset. The incidence of pediatric-onset IBD increased from 10.8 per 100,000 in 2005 to 15.3 per 100,000 in 2019 (average annual percentage change, 2.8%; 95% CI, 2.2%-3.4%), but that of VEOIBD remained stable (average annual percentage change, 0%; 95% CI, -2.5% to 2.6%). The infantile-onset and toddler-onset groups were treated less often with biologics (36% and 35%, respectively) vs the early onset (57%) and adolescent-onset groups (53%; P.001). The time to steroid dependency was shorter in infantile-onset (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.5-2.9) and toddler-onset disease (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0) vs early onset and adolescent-onset disease, but time to hospitalizations, time to surgery, and growth delay were worse only in infantile-onset disease. In a multivariable model, infantile-onset patients had a higher risk for surgery (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9) and hospitalization (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4) than the toddler-onset group.The incidence of VEOIBD remained stable. Infantile-onset IBD had worse outcomes than older children, while toddler onset had mostly similar outcomes, despite less frequent use of biologics.

Background and Aims Age is a major prognostic factor for COVID-19 outcomes. The effect of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] activity on COVID-19 is unclear. We examined the relationship between IBD activity and COVID-19 severity according to age. Methods We included IBD patients diagnosed with COVID-19, reported to SECURE-IBD between March 13, 2020 and August 3, 2021. Clinical IBD activity was measured by physician global assessment [PGA]. COVID-19-related outcomes were [1] intensive care unit [ICU] admission, ventilation or death, and [2] hospitalization. Using generalized estimating equations, we determined adjusted odds ratios [aOR, 95% confidence interval] for moderate and severe PGA vs clinical remission/mild PGA, controlling for demographics, medications and COVID-19 diagnosis period. We performed stratified analyses by age [≤50 vs >50 years]. Results Among 6078 patients, adverse COVID-19 outcomes were more common with active IBD: ICU/ventilation/death in 3.6% [175/4898] of remission/mild, 4.9% [45/920] of moderate and 8.8% [23/260] of severe [p < 0.001]; and hospitalization in 13% [649/4898] of remission/mild, 19% [178/920] of moderate and 38% [100/260] of severe [p < 0.001]. Stratified by decade, effect sizes were larger for younger patients. In patients ≤50 years, severe PGA was independently associated with ICU/ventilation/death (aOR 3.27 [1.15–9.30]) and hospitalization (aOR 4.62 [2.83–7.55]). In contrast, severe PGA was not independently associated with COVID-19 outcomes in those older than 50 years. Conclusions Clinically active IBD may be a risk factor for severe COVID-19, particularly in younger patients. IBD disease control, including through medication compliance, and strategies to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 infection amongst patients with active IBD [e.g. distancing, immunization] are key to limit adverse COVID-19 outcomes.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis, are chronic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, with an unknown etiology, that affect over 6.8 million people worldwide. To characterize disease pathogenesis, proteomic and bioinformatic analyses were performed on colon biopsies collected during diagnostic endoscopy from 119 treatment-naïve pediatric patients, including from 78 IBD patients and 41 non-IBD patients who served as controls. Due to the presence of noninflamed and/or inflamed regions in IBD patients, up to two biopsies were obtained from IBD patients as compared to a single noninflamed biopsy from non-IBD pediatric control patients. Additional biopsies were obtained and analyzed from 33 of the IBD patients after IBD-directed therapeutic intervention for comparison of pre- and post-treatment proteomes. SuperSILAC was utilized to perform quantitative analysis of homogenized tissues, which were processed by filter-aided sample preparation. Hierarchical clustering and principal component analyses revealed proteomic patterns that distinguished inflamed from noninflamed tissues independent of therapy. Gene ontology revealed that proteins downregulated in inflammation are associated with metabolism, whereas upregulated proteins contribute to protein processing. A comparison of pre- and post-treatment proteomes from CD patients identified over 100 proteins that are significantly different between patients who responded and those who did not respond to therapy, including creatine kinase B and basigin.

Objectives To evaluate for increased rectal bleeding following enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in children hospitalized for ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods Retrospective cohort study (2007--2016) of 218 inpatients with active UC. Patients receiving enoxaparin were compared with a nonenoxaparin-treated patient group. Severity of UC was determined using the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI). Hemoglobin (Hb) values and packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions were reviewed for a 7-day period following hospital admission. A linear mixed effect model was used to compare change in Hb values between the groups. Risk of pRBC transfusion was compared using a log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression. A sub-analysis was also conducted restricting to patients with severe UC to provide more generalizable insight into safety profile of enoxaparin. Results Children hospitalized for UC and receiving enoxaparin were more likely to have severe disease, received infliximab therapy and be admitted after 2010. Use of enoxaparin showed there was not a difference (P = 0.60) in the fall of Hb detected among those with acute severe colitis (initial PUCAI ≥65) during the week following admission. Moreover, there was no difference in the risk of requiring a pRBC transfusion with enoxaparin use (log-rank test all patients: P = 0.80; severe UC: P = 0.88; Cox proportional hazard regression all patients: P = 0.72; severe UC: 0.85). Conclusions There was no difference in Hb levels or need for blood transfusions in children hospitalized for severe UC (PUCAI ≥65) whether or not they received enoxaparin for thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Background and Aims Although venous thromboembolism [VTE] is a well-known complication of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] in adults, limited data exist on the risk in children. We report the incidence of VTE among children with and without IBD. Methods We conducted a matched cohort study within a distributed network of population-based Canadian provincial health administrative databases. Children Results The 5-year incidence of VTE among 3593 children with IBD was 31.2 [95% CI 23.7–41.0] per 10 000 person-years [PY] compared to 0.8 [95% CI 0.4–1.7] per 10 000 PY among 16 289 children without IBD [unadjusted IRR 38.84, 95% CI 16.59–90.83; adjusted HR 22.91, 95% CI 11.50–45.63]. VTE was less common in Crohn’s disease than ulcerative colitis [unadjusted IRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27–0.83; adjusted HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29–0.94]. The findings were similar for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism when comparing children with and without IBD. Conclusions The risk of VTE is much higher in children with IBD than controls without IBD. While the absolute risk is low, we found a higher incidence rate than previously described in the pediatric literature. Conference Presentation: An abstract based on the data included in this paper was presented at Canadian Digestive Diseases Week [Montréal, Canada] in March 2020.

Background The transfer of information is a key aspect of the transition of adolescent patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from pediatric to adult care. This is typically accomplished through the use of a consultation letter with a medical summary of the patient being transferred. To improve the quality and completeness of information included in a transfer letter, we developed a standardized medical summary template by integrating the feedback of adult and pediatric health care providers. Methods To develop the letter template, we purposively sampled gastroenterologists or nurse practitioners caring for patients with IBD in four Canadian cities and invited them to take part in focus group discussions. Using a semi-structured approach, we explored the items deemed essential for inclusion in a transfer summary. Using the conventional content analysis framework, the focus group discussions were inductively coded to identify areas of priority for inclusion in the template. Results Four focus groups were conducted, comprising 17 health care providers of 30 invited (56.7% participation). The resulting medical summary template included the following major headings: patient/disease characteristics, therapeutics history (including medications and surgeries), clinical history and current status, noteworthy investigations, history of complications (including hospitalizations), family history, immunization history and psychosocial history. The template also addressed health system process factors (i.e., urgency of transfer, mode of delivery and confidentiality) to ensure a seamless transfer to adult care. Conclusions The standardized medical summary template should be used by pediatric providers to ensure that essential patient information and disease characteristics are sent to an adult provider.

Background Modern, specialised care for children with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] may have resulted in changes in health services use. We report trends over time in health services utilisation and surgery for children with IBD and children without IBD. Methods Children aged Results IBD-specific hospitalisation rates decreased by 2.5% [95% CI 1.8–3.2%] annually, and all-cause hospitalisation rates in children without IBD decreased by 4.3% [95% CI 3.5–5.1%] annually. Intestinal resection risk in CD decreased by 6.0% [95% CI 4.6–7.3%] annually and colectomy risk in UC decreased by 3.0% [95% CI 0.7–5.2%] annually. In contrast, IBD-specific outpatient visit rates increased after 2005 by 4.0% [95% CI 3.1–4.9%] annually. Similar trends in outpatient visits were not observed in children without IBD. Conclusions Hospitalisations and surgeries decreased over time while outpatient visits increased after 2005. Decreasing hospitalisations were mirrored in children without IBD, likely resulting from a combination of changes in disease management and health system factors.

Data on pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated indirect and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs are limited. We aimed to estimate indirect (lost work hours and productivity) and OOP pediatric IBD-associated costs in Canada.In a nation-wide cross-sectional analysis, caregivers of children with IBD were invited to complete a questionnaire on lost work hours and OOP costs related to IBD in the 4 weeks prior to the survey. Participants were reinvited to periodically answer the same questionnaire every 3-9 months for 2 years. Lost productivity was calculated using the Human Capital method. Costs were reported in 2018 inflation-adjusted Canadian dollars. Predictors of high cost users (top 25%) were examined using binary logistic regression.Consecutive 243 (82 incident cases) of 262 (92.7%) approached participants completed the first survey with a total of 450 surveys longitudinally completed over 2 years. The median annual indirect cost per patient was $5966 (IQR $1809-$12,676), with $5721 (IQR $1366-$11,545) for Crohn's disease (CD) and $7007 (IQR $2428-$14,057) for ulcerative colitis (UC) ( P = 0.11). The annual median per patient OOP costs were $4550 with $4550 for CD and $5038 for UC ( P = 0.53). Longer travel distance to clinic was associated with higher OOP costs (odds ratio = 4.55; Plt; 0.0001; 95% confidence interval: 1.99-10.40).Indirect and OOP IBD-associated costs are substantial and more likely to affect families living in remote communities.

Objectives With the increased prevalence of childhood-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), there is a greater need for a planned transition process for adolescents and young adults (AYA). The Canadian IBD Transition Network and Crohn’s and Colitis Canada joined in collaborative efforts to describe a set of care consensus statements to provide a framework for transitioning AYA from pediatric to adult care. Methods Consensus statements were drafted after focus group meetings and literature reviews. An expert panel consisting of 20 IBD physicians, nurses, surgeon, adolescent medicine physician, as well as patient and caregiver representatives met, discussed and systematically voted. The consensus was reached when greater than 75% of members voted in agreement. When greater than 75% of members rated strong support, the statement was rendered a strong recommendation, suggesting that a clinician should implement the statement for all or most of their clinical practice. Results The Canadian expert panel generated 15 consensus statements (9 strong and 6 weak recommendations). Areas of focus of the statements included: transition program implementation, key stakeholders, areas of potential need and gaps in the research. Conclusions These consensus statements provide a framework for the transition process. The quality of evidence for these statements was generally low, highlighting the need for further controlled studies to investigate and better define effective strategies for transition in pediatric to adult IBD care.

We estimated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes among individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in Ontario, Canada.In this population-based analysis, we used a test-negative design across four immune-mediated inflammatory disease population-based cohorts, comprising individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease. We identified all SARS-CoV-2 tests done in these populations between March 1 and Nov 22, 2021 (a period in which there was rapid uptake of vaccines, and the alpha [B.1.1.7] and delta [B.1.617.2] SARS-CoV-2 variants were predominantly circulating in Canada) and separately assessed outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalisation due to COVID-19 and death due to COVID-19) for each disease group. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the effectiveness of one, two, and three doses of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech], or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) among individuals at the time of SARS-CoV-2 testing.Between March 1 and Nov 22, 2021, we identified 2127 (5·9%) test-positive cases among 36 145 individuals (26 476 [73·2%] were female and 9669 [26·8%] were male) with rheumatoid arthritis tested, 476 (6·1%) test-positive cases among 7863 individuals (4130 [52·5%] were female and 3733 [47·5%] were male) with ankylosing spondylitis tested, 3089 (6·5%) test-positive cases among 47 199 individuals (26 062 [55·2%] were female and 21 137 [44·8%] were male) with psoriasis tested, and 1702 (5·4%) test-positive cases among 31 311 individuals (17 716 [56·6%] were female and 13 595 [43·4%] were male) with inflammatory bowel disease tested. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness of two doses against infection was 83% (95% CI 80-86) in those with rheumatoid arthritis, 89% (83-93) among those with ankylosing spondylitis, 84% (81-86) among those with psoriasis, and 79% (74-82) among those with inflammatory bowel disease. After two vaccine doses, effectiveness against infection generally peaked 31-60 days after vaccination and waned gradually with each additional month. Vaccine effectiveness against severe outcomes after two doses was 92% (95% CI 88-95) in those with rheumatoid arthritis, 97% (83-99) among those with ankylosing spondylitis, 92% (86-95) among those with psoriasis, and 94% (88-97) among those with inflammatory bowel disease. Vaccine effectiveness after a third dose against infection was similar to or higher than after the second dose (ranging from 76% [47-89] to 96% [72-99]), although due to a paucity of events, estimates could not be calculated for some subgroups for severe outcomes.Two vaccine doses were found to be highly effective against both SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease during the study period. Research is needed to determine the durability of effectiveness of three doses over time, particularly against emerging variants.Public Health Agency of Canada.

Kawasaki disease (KD) is a childhood vasculitis with conflicting reported North American trends in incidence and patient characteristics. Objectives: (1) determine KD incidence between 1995 and 2017; (2) compare patient characteristics by era and age group; (3) determine complication and cardiovascular follow-up rates. We used population-based health administrative data to identify children (0–18 yr) hospitalized with KD in Ontario, Canada between 1995 and 2017. We excluded children with prior KD diagnosis or incomplete records. We determined the annualized incidence and follow-up trends. KD was diagnosed in 4,346 children between 1995 and 2017. Annual KD incidence was 22.0 (

We read with interest the highly impactful CLARITY IBD study that demonstrated a diminished serological response to SARS-CoV-2 in individuals with IBD receiving infliximab as compared with those receiving vedolizumab.1 We assessed the prevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with IBD and evaluated whether serological response to SARS-CoV-2 wanes over time following infection. Individuals with IBD from Calgary, Canada, were recruited from October 2020 to April 2021 and stratified into two cohorts: (1) serosurveillance (n=279) defined as those who were not previously diagnosed with COVID-19; and (2) COVID-19 recovered (n=45), defined as those with a molecular-confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection via PCR. Serum was analysed using the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody to the nucleocapsid protein. A positive antibody test was defined as an index signal/cut-off ≥1.4. The assay has been validated with 95% sensitivity and >99% specificity 12 days following symptom onset and correlates to neutralising antibodies.2 We assessed the proportion, with 95% CIs, of individuals with IBD who mounted an antibody response among those undergoing serosurveillance and following infection with SARS-CoV-2. In those diagnosed with COVID-19, we calculated the days from diagnosis to serological testing and developed a logistic regression model that assessed the effect of time from COVID-19 diagnosis to serology testing (before vs after 90 days) on nucleocapsid positive versus negative antibody; adjusted for age, sex and anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) usage. The baseline characteristics of the two cohorts are summarised in table 1. Among the serosurveillance cohort, 1.08% (95% CI 0.22 to …