Search

Purpose Smoking, age, and nutrition have been associated with the development of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and can increase the risk of arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs). This study assesses annual rates of ATEs in new-onset neovascular AMD patients compared with matched controls. Design Retrospective study. Participants New-onset neovascular AMD patients and age-, race-, gender-, and database length–matched controls from the 5% Medicare database. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 5% Medicare database from 2001 to 2003. New-onset neovascular AMD patients were included if they were ≥65 years old, had 2 diagnoses of neovascular AMD, and had at least 1 year of data before the first diagnosis of AMD within the dataset. A control group was constructed in a 3:1 ratio from those without a diagnosis of a major eye disorder and matched by age, race, gender, and length of data. Annual prevalence rates were determined for myocardial infarctions (MIs) and ischemic cerebral vascular accidents (CVAs). Main Outcome Measures Rates of MIs and ischemic CVAs in new-onset neovascular AMD patients and matched controls from 2001 to 2003. Results There were 15771 new-onset neovascular AMD patients identified and matched with 46 408 controls. Average age was 80.5 years, with 64% ≥80; 65% were female; and 95.9% were white. Inpatient MI rates for neovascular AMD patients and controls were 2.2% and 2.2%, respectively ( P = 0.74). Inpatient ischemic CVA rates for neovascular AMD patients and controls were 3.5% and 3.6%, respectively ( P = 0.59). Myocardial infarction rates and ischemic CVA rates for both groups increased with age. Subgroups of patients with comorbidities known to be risk factors for ATEs (i.e., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and arrhythmias) had a higher rate of events. Patients with previous ATEs were also at a higher risk of subsequent events, at 7.4% for inpatient MI and 35.1% for inpatient ischemic stroke. Conclusion Despite the shared risk factors associated with neovascular AMD and ATEs, Medicare beneficiaries with neovascular AMD had a rate of ATEs similar to that of matched controls. Rates of ATEs increased in patients with comorbidities and for patients with previous events.

Purpose To evaluate the quality of reporting in the neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) literature by applying the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement writing standards. Design CONSORT and STROBE impact analysis; literature review. Participants Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of verteporfin photodynamic therapy, pegaptanib, and ranibizumab, and interventional case studies of bevacizumab for nvAMD. Methods A literature search identified eligible articles published before October 31, 2007. We assessed the report quality of Phase III RCTs using the CONSORT statement and case series publications using the STROBE statement, both with indicators relevant to nvAMD. Main Outcome Measures Presence or absence of CONSORT or STROBE statement indicators. Results Seven publications of Phase III RCTs and 29 publications on bevacizumab interventional case studies for nvAMD met our inclusion criteria. Of 37 possible CONSORT writing guideline items, the mean report quality for RCTs was 30.6 (83%), with a range from 23 to 35 (65%–95%). Of 35 possible STROBE writing guideline items, the mean report quality grade for intravitreal bevacizumab case series was 23 (70%), with a range from 16 to 31 (46%–94%). Among the bevacizumab studies, more than 90% reported scientific background, drug dose and administration, baseline characteristics, unadjusted results, and adverse events. Fewer than 20% reported study size calculations, handling of missing data, or a discussion of bias. Conclusions Since the adoption of the CONSORT standards by Ophthalmology and other journals in 1996, the reporting quality for RCTs has further improved among this cohort of nvAMD articles. On the other hand, no reporting standards for case series have existed until the recent publication of the STROBE statement. In this first application of the STROBE standards to ophthalmology, we found that the small interventional studies in our series had an average reporting score lower than the RCTs, but also that some individual scores were higher than the RCTs. This outcome demonstrates that good, useful articles can be written about small studies. Although not a direct measure of the quality of a study, good reporting allows a reader to assess the validity and applicability of the study's findings. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.