Search

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that the accumulation of protein- bound uremic retention solutes, such as indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate and kynurenic acid, play a role in the accelerated cardiovascular disease seen in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Protein-binding, presumably to albumin, renders these solutes poor-dialyzable. We previously observed that the free fraction of indoxyl sulfate was markedly reduced at the end of hemodialysis. We hypothesized that solute binding might be pH-dependent and attributed the changes in free solute concentration to the higher serum pH observed at the end of standard hemodialysis with dialysis buffer bicarbonate concentration greater than 35 mmol/L. We observed that acidification of uremic plasma to pH 6 in vitro greatly increased the proportion of freeIS. METHODS: We tested our hypothesis by reducing the dialysate bicarbonate buffer concentration to 25 mmol/L for the initial half of the hemodialysis treatment ("isohydric dialysis"). Eight stable hemodialysis patients underwent "isohydric dialysis" for 90 minutes and then were switched to standard buffer (bicarbonate = 37mmol/L). A second dialysis, 2 days later, employed standard buffer throughout. RESULTS: We found a clearcut separation of blood pH and bicarbonate concentrations after 90 minutes of "isohydric dialysis" (pH = 7.37, bicarbonate = 22.4 mmol/L) and standard dialysis (pH = 7.49, bicarbonate = 29.0 mmol/L). Binding affinity varied widely among the 10 uremic retention solutes analyzed. Kynurenic acid (0.05 free), p-cresyl sulfate (0.12 free) and indoxyl sulfate (0.13 free) demonstrated the greatest degree of binding. Three solutes (indoxyl glucuronide, p-cresyl glucuronide, and phenyl glucuronide) were virtually unbound. Analysis of free and bound concentrations of uremic retention solutes confirmed our prediction that binding of solute is affected by pH. However, in a mixed models analysis, we found that the reduction in total uremic solute concentration during dialysis accounted for a greater proportion of the variation in free concentration, presumably an effect of saturation binding to albumin, than did the relatively small change in pH produced by isohydric dialysis. The effect of pH on binding appeared to be restricted to those solutes most highly protein-bound. The solutes most tightly bound exhibited the lowest dialyzer clearances. An increase in dialyzer clearance during isohydric and standard dialyses was statistically significant only for kynurenic acid. CONCLUSION: These findings provide evidence that the binding of uremic retention solutes is influenced by pH. The effect of reducing buffer bicarbonate concentration ("isohydric dialysis:"), though significant, was small but may be taken to suggest that further modification of dialysis technique that would expose blood to a greater decrease in pH would lead to a greater increase the free fraction of solute and enhance the efficacy of hemodialysis in the removal of highly protein-bound uremic retention solutes. ispartof: PLOS ONE vol:13 issue:2 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Ischemic acute kidney injury (AKI) triggers expression of adaptive (protective) and maladaptive genes. Agents that increase expression of protective genes should provide a therapeutic benefit. We now report that bardoxolone methyl (BARD) ameliorates ischemic murine AKI as assessed by both renal function and pathology. BARD may exert its beneficial effect by increasing expression of genes previously shown to protect against ischemic AKI, NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ), and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1). Although we found that BARD alone or ischemia-reperfusion alone increased expression of these genes, the greatest increase occurred after the combination of both ischemia-reperfusion and BARD. BARD had a different mode of action than other agents that regulate PPARγ and Nrf2. Thus we report that BARD regulates PPARγ, not by acting as a ligand but by increasing the amount of PPARγ mRNA and protein. This should increase ligand-independent effects of PPARγ. Similarly, BARD increased Nrf2 mRNA; this increased Nrf2 protein by mechanisms in addition to the prolongation of Nrf2 protein half-life previously reported. Finally, we localized expression of these protective genes after ischemia and BARD treatment. Using double-immunofluorescence staining for CD31 and Nrf2 or PPARγ, we found increased Nrf2 and PPARγ on glomerular endothelia in the cortex; Nrf2 was also present on cortical peritubular capillaries. In contrast, HO-1 was localized to different cells, i.e., tubules and interstitial leukocytes. Although Nrf2-dependent increases in HO-1 have been described, our data suggest that BARD's effects on tubular and leukocyte HO-1 during ischemic AKI may be Nrf2 independent. We also found that BARD ameliorated cisplatin nephrotoxicity.

OBJECTIVE Utilization, outcomes, and retransplantation (ReTx) of liver allografts obtained by donation after cardiac death (DCD) are examined to identify mechanisms to optimize donation. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA DCD for liver transplantation (LTX) has immediate potential to expand the donor pool but application is limited. METHODS Retrospective analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) from January 2002 to April 2007 identified 855 DCD and 21,089 donation after brain death (DBD) adult, initial, whole-organ, liver-only LTX. Donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics were compared. Outcome measures were listing for ReTx within 1 year and graft survival determined as death or ReTx. RESULTS DCD donors were younger (P < 0.001), with fewer African American and non-white race (P < 0.001), and fewer deaths secondary to stroke (P < 0.001). DCD recipients were older (P < 0.001), with lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (P < 0.001), and less likely in intensive care (P = 0.02) or high-urgency status (P < 0.001). DCD allografts were more frequently imported from another allocation region (12% vs. 7%; P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis of time to DCD graft failure demonstrates higher DCD graft failure within the first 180 days (20.5% DCD vs. 11.5% DBD; P < 0.001) with convergence thereafter. DCD listing for ReTx and graft failure progressed continuously over 180 days versus 20 days in DBD. At ReTx, DCD recipients waited longer and received higher risk allografts (P = 0.039) more often from another region. More DCD recipients remain waiting for ReTx with fewer removed for death, clinical deterioration, or improvement. CONCLUSIONS DCD utilization is impeded by early outcomes and a temporally different failure pattern that limits access to ReTx. Allocation policy that recognizes these limitations and increases access to ReTx is necessary for expansion of this donor population.

The pharmacokinetics and hemodynamics of sildenafil citrate in male hemodialysis patients. Background Erectile dysfunction (ED) is highly prevalent in men with renal disease. The clearance of sildenafil citrate, a highly effective oral treatment for ED, is decreased in men with severe renal insufficiency, but the pharmacokinetic and hemodynamic profiles during maintenance hemodialysis in men with end-stage renal disease have not been studied. Methods Fifteen men undergoing chronic outpatient maintenance hemodialysis received a single 50-mg oral dose of sildenafil on 2 occasions, once 2 hours before, and once 2 hours after hemodialysis, with randomized assignment to sequence. Blood and dialysate samples were collected, and hemodynamic measurements were made. Results Hemodialysis did not significantly clear either sildenafil or its primary metabolite, UK-103,320. Administration after hemodialysis was associated with a 17% higher peak plasma concentration and earlier time to peak, which were not clinically meaningful, whereas the overall extent of absorption and the elimination half-life were not affected. The average extent of drug bound to plasma protein was approximately 96% in hemodialysis patients. Intradialytic hypotension was not observed more frequently when sildenafil was administered before hemodialysis. Systolic blood pressure tended to decrease less during hemodialysis when subjects were treated with sildenafil before dialysis. Conclusion The present study demonstrates that sildenafil is not cleared by hemodialysis, and the pharmacokinetic profile resembles more closely that observed in normal volunteers than that observed in patients with severe renal insufficiency. In addition, we found that sildenafil does not promote intradialytic hypotension.