Search

The objective of this study was to assess the level of interest in preconception carrier screening among reproductive‐aged persons presenting for gynecologic care and to identify demographic factors predictive of pursuing screening. Patients aged 18–40 who were presenting for gynecologic care at a single U.S. academic medical center were provided with information about current options for preconception carrier screening and were offered genetic counseling referral with the possibility to undergo screening. Outcomes of interest were desire for genetic counseling referral and attendance at genetic counseling visit. Statistical analyses were performed as appropriate using R version 3.6.1 with variables significant at 0.1 included in a multivariable logistic regression. Of 193 participants, 79 (41%) desired genetic counseling referral. Participants aged 25–34 (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.47–8.10) and nulliparas (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.23–6.03) were more likely to desire referral. Thirty‐five participants (44.3% of those who desired referral) attended a visit with genetic counseling. Having an advanced degree (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.06–10.4) was associated with visit attendance. Thirteen participants underwent screening, and five were found to be a carrier of at least one X‐linked or autosomal recessive condition. Surprisingly, presenting for a gynecologic visit directly related to planning a pregnancy was not associated with increased interest in preconception carrier screening. Nulliparas and those aged 25–34 likely expressed greater interest in referral due to high potential for future childbearing in these groups. The increased level of visit attendance in participants with advanced degrees is likely confounded by the high level of health literacy and financial resources in this group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To better understand health habits in older nurses versus the general population, we sought to determine whether the demographics, health care utilization, and Medicare spending by the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) participants enrolled in Medicare and a matched sample of Medicare beneficiaries meaningfully differed. Materials and Methods: Analytic cohorts included a random 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries continuously enrolled in fee for service (FFS) Medicare that were propensity matched to the NHS participants continuously enrolled in FFS Medicare in a single year (2012). Matching was based upon preselected demographic factors and health status, using a nearest-neighbor matching algorithm to obtain a 1:1 match without replacement. Healthcare utilization and spending were compared between the two groups; we also stratified findings by number of chronic comorbidities. Results: Similar rates of utilization of primary care and most outpatient services. However, NHS participants had slightly higher rates of cancer screening, specialist care, and inpatient surgery were observed. When stratified by comorbidity status, the largest differences in utilization and spending were found in women with no comorbidity. Conclusions: The modest differences in observed healthcare utilization and spending suggest that older healthcare professionals may access care in fairly similar ways to the general population, and that health status may be a more important determinant of utilization and spending than health profession in older age groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]