Search

The T cell response to the 65-kD mycobacterial heat-shock protein (Bhsp65) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune arthritis. Adjuvant arthritis (AA) induced in the Lewis rat (RT-1(l)) by injection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis serves as an experimental model for human rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the immunological basis of regulation of acute AA, or of susceptibility/resistance to AA is not known. We have defined the specificity of the proliferative T cell responses to Bhsp65 during the course of AA in the Lewis rat. During the early phase of the disease (6-9 d after onset of AA), Lewis rats raised T cell responses to many determinants within Bhsp65, spread throughout the molecule. Importantly, in the late phase of the disease (8-10 wk after onset of AA), there was evidence for diversification of the T cell responses toward Bhsp65 carboxy-terminal determinants (BCTD) (namely, 417-431, 441-455, 465-479, 513-527, and 521-535). Moreover, arthritic rats in the late phase of AA also raised vigorous T cell responses to those carboxy-terminal determinants within self(rat) hsp65 (Rhsp65) that correspond in position to the above BCTD. These results suggest that the observed diversification is possibly triggered in vivo by induction of self(Rhsp65)-reactive T cells. Interestingly, another strain of rat, the Wistar Kyoto (WKY/NHsd) rat (RT-1(l)), with the same major histocompatibility complex class II molecules as the Lewis rat, was found to be resistant to AA. In WKY rats, vigorous responses to the BCTD, to which the Lewis rat responded only in the late phase of AA, were observed very early, 10 d after injection of M. tuberculosis, Strikingly, pretreatment with the peptides comprising the set of BCTD, but not its amino-terminal determinants, provided significant protection to naive Lewis rats from subsequent induction of AA. Thus, T cell responses to the BCTD are involved in regulating inflammatory arthritis in the Lewis rat and in conferring resistance to AA in the WKY rat. These results have important implications in understanding the pathogenesis of RA and in devising new immunotherapeutic strategies for this disease.

Among pts with CLL/SLL, the median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range, 2-18), all pts received prior BTKi therapy, 27 (47%) received prior BTKi and BCL2i therapy, and 36 (63%) had C481S-mutated BTK. B Background: b Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are standard of care for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), but resistance can develop, most commonly because of BTK mutations. AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Century Therapeutics, Genentech, Genmab, Hutchison MediPharma, Iksuda Therapeutics, InnoCare Pharma, Janssen, Kite Pharma, MorphoSys, Myeloid Therapeutics, Novartis, Nurix Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics, Roche, Secura Bio, Servier Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, Verastem, Vincerx Pharma, Xencor Research funding: Research Grants: All payments made to Sarah Cannon Research Institute, not to the physician. [Extracted from the article]

B Introduction: b Despite progress in treating LBCL, approximately 50% to 60% of pts will either not achieve a complete response (CR) or will relapse after current first- or second-line therapy. DURABLES RESPONSES WITH ANTI-CD19 ALLOGENEIC CAR T ALLO-501/501A IN PHASE 1 TRIALS OF RELAPSED/REFRACTORY LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA (R/R LBCL) Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have revolutionized the care of pts with I r i / I r i LBCL; however, patient-specific manufacturing processes and long wait times prevent their broad use and many pts who would be eligible are unable to receive therapy due to lack of accessibility. [Extracted from the article]

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) are essentially different manifestations of the same disease that are similarly managed. A number of molecular and cytogenetic variables with prognostic implications have been identified. Undetectable minimal residual disease at the end of treatment with chemoimmunotherapy or venetoclax-based combination regimens is an independent predictor of improved survival among patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. The selection of treatment is based on the disease stage, presence or absence of del(17p) or TP53 mutation, immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region mutation status, patient age, performance status, comorbid conditions, and the agent's toxicity profile. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with CLL/SLL.

Purpose: New therapies are needed for relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase 1b, open-label trial evaluated two anti-CD20-based triplet combinations., Methods: Patients with R/R follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 13) were treated with obinutuzumab, atezolizumab, and polatuzumab vedotin (G-atezo-pola; 1.4 mg/kg/1.8 mg/kg) and patients with R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 23) received rituximab (R)-atezo-pola. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR) at end of induction (EOI) by PET-CT (investigator assessed; modified Lugano 2014 criteria). Safety endpoints were also assessed., Results: 13 FL patients were treated and evaluable for safety; 2/23 DLBCL patients did not receive treatment and were not included in the safety population. Median observation time was 23.3 and 5.7 months in the FL and DLBCL cohorts, respectively. At EOI, CR rates in FL patients treated with G-atezo-pola at pola doses of 1.4 mg/kg (N = 3) and 1.8 mg/kg (N = 7) were 33% and 14%, respectively. In DLBCL patients receiving R-atezo-pola, the CR rate at EOI was 13%. In the FL cohort, 62% of patients experienced a grade 3-5 adverse event (AE; including two deaths) and 31% developed a serious AE (SAE). In DLBCL patients, R-atezo-pola was associated with a lower incidence of grade 3-5 AEs (24%; one death) and SAEs (10%). In both cohorts, the most common grade 3-5 AEs were hematologic toxicities., Conclusion: Based on these safety issues, considered as related specifically to G-atezo-pola, and limited efficacy, no further development of either combination is planned., Trial Registration: NCT02729896; Date of registration: April 6, 2016., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has significantly evolved in recent years. Targeted therapy with Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors has emerged as an effective chemotherapy-free option for patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. Undetectable minimal residual disease after the end of treatment is emerging as an important predictor of progression-free and overall survival for patients treated with fixed-duration BCL-2 inhibitor-based treatment. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the updates to the NCCN Guidelines for CLL/SLL specific to the use of chemotherapy-free treatment options for patients with treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory disease.

The primary analysis of the phase 3 ALCANZA trial showed significantly improved objective responses lasting ≥4 months (ORR4; primary endpoint) and progression-free survival (PFS) with brentuximab vedotin vs physician's choice (methotrexate or bexarotene) in CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides (MF) or primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (C-ALCL). Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas often cause pruritus and pain; brentuximab vedotin improved skin symptom burden with no negative effects on quality of life. We report final data from ALCANZA (median follow-up, 45.9 months). Adults with previously treated CD30-expressing MF/C-ALCL were randomly assigned to brentuximab vedotin (n = 64) or physician's choice (n = 64). Final data demonstrated improved responses per independent review facility with brentuximab vedotin vs physician's choice: ORR4; 54.7% vs 12.5% (P < .001); complete response, 17.2% vs 1.6% (P = .002). Median PFS with brentuximab vedotin vs physician's choice was 16.7 months vs 3.5 months (P < .001). Median time to the next treatment was significantly longer with brentuximab vedotin than with physician's choice (14.2 vs 5.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.42; P < .001). Of 44 patients in the brentuximab vedotin arm who experienced any-grade peripheral neuropathy, (grade 3, n = 6; grade 4, n = 0), 86% (38 of 44) had complete resolution (26 of 44) or improvement to grades 1 and 2 (12 of 44). Peripheral neuropathy was ongoing in 18 patients (all grades 1-2). These final analyses confirm improved, clinically meaningful, durable responses and longer PFS with brentuximab vedotin vs physician's choice in CD30-expressing MF or C-ALCL. This trial was registered at https://www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01578499., (© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: CD19-directed chimeric antigen T-cell receptor (CAR-T) therapies have revolutionized the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive B-cell lymphomas (aBCL). The results of the landmark ZUMA-1 and JULIET trials have been reproducible in real-world settings across multiple institutions, and patients with double (DHL) or triple (THL) hit lymphomas have demonstrated non-inferior outcomes compared to non-DHL/THL counterparts., Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 53 patients with R/R aBCL who received CAR-T from October 2017 to June 2020 at the University of California, Los Angeles. Patient characteristics, lymphoma-related variables and outcomes of interest were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared between groups by Fisher's exact test. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for analysis of OS, progression free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR). Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate for significant prognostic variables., Results: With a median follow-up of 15.2 months, this cohort demonstrated overall response rate and complete response rate of 72% and 64% (n = 34), respectively. The median DOR, PFS and OS were not reached, 7.9 and 17.7 months, respectively. By univariate analysis, DHL/THL status was the only clinical feature significantly associated with relapse post-CAR-T (OR 5.9, P = .015)., Conclusions: Our single-institution, real-world cohort of R/R aBCL patients demonstrated similar efficacy outcomes to those of the ZUMA-1 and JULIET trials and published real-world studies. Our findings suggest DHL/THL patients may benefit from novel CAR-T constructs, maintenance strategies with immunomodulatory agents or allogeneic-HCT., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, can lead to disfiguring lesions, debilitating pruritus and frequent skin infections. This study assessed response to brentuximab vedotin in patients with MF in the phase III ALCANZA study., Methods: Baseline CD30 levels and large-cell transformation (LCT) status were centrally reviewed in patients with previously-treated CD30-positive MF using ≥2 skin biopsies obtained at screening; eligible patients required ≥1 biopsy with ≥10% CD30 expression. Patients were categorised as CD30 min  < 10% (≥1 biopsy with <10% CD30 expression), or CD30 min  ≥ 10% (all biopsies with ≥10% CD30 expression) and baseline LCT present or absent. Efficacy analyses were the proportion of patients with objective response lasting ≥4 months (ORR4) and progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Clinical activity with brentuximab vedotin was observed across all CD30 expression levels in patients with ≥1 biopsy showing ≥10% CD30 expression. Superior ORR4 was observed with brentuximab vedotin versus physician's choice in patients: with CD30 min  < 10% (40.9% versus 9.5%), with CD30 min  ≥ 10% (57.1% versus 10.3%), with LCT (64.7% versus 17.6%) and without LCT (38.7% versus 6.5%). Brentuximab vedotin improved median PFS versus physician's choice in patients: with CD30 min  < 10% (16.7 versus 2.3 months), with CD30 min  ≥ 10% (15.5 versus 3.9 months), with LCT (15.5 versus 2.8 months) and without LCT (16.1 versus 3.5 months). Safety profiles were generally comparable across subgroups., Conclusion: These exploratory analyses demonstrated that brentuximab vedotin improved rates of ORR4 and PFS versus physician's choice in patients with CD30-positive MF and ≥1 biopsy showing ≥10% CD30 expression, regardless of LCT status., Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01578499., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Y.H.K. reports advisory roles for Seagen and Takeda. H.M.P. reports advisory board for and grants or funds from Takeda. D.F. reports advisory roles for Kyowa Kirin. S.M.H. reports consulting fees from ADC Therapeutics, C4 Therapeutics, Celgene, Janssen, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Myeloid Therapeutics, Seagen, Takeda, Verastem and Vividion Therapeutics, and research grants or funds from ADC Therapeutics, Aileron, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Forty Seven, Inc., Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Millennium/Takeda, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Seagen, Trillium Therapeutics and Verastem. M.D. reports research funding from Takeda and Millennium for this study, Seagen for a physician IST, and institutional funding from Solenginex, miragene, Rhizen and Eisai. O.B. reports consulting fees from Novartis, BMS, Sanofi, Pierre, Fabre and MSD. J.A.S. reports speaker’s bureau, and consultancy/advisory roles for Takeda (Brazil). J.S. reports consulting fees from/Clinical Expert for Takeda. P.Q. reports advisory boards and speaker fee for Takeda, Kiowa, Therakos, Miragen, Helsinn-Recordati, Innate Pharma, 4SC and Actelion. P.L.Z. reports advisory roles for and honoraria from Merck, BMS, Servier, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, ADC Therapeutics, Abbvie, Incyte, Janssen, Gilead, Eusapharma, Roche, Debiopharm and Novartis. H.E. reports advisory roles for Abbvie and Genentech, honoraria from Abbvie, Genentech, Takeda and Pharmacyclics, grants or funds from Abbvie, Genentech, Pharmacyclics, Acerta, Celgene and Astrazeneca. L.C.P-B. reports advisory roles for and honoraria from Seagen. P.L.O-R. reports advisory roles for Takeda, Helsinn, 4SC, Actelion, Innate Pharma, Recordati Rare Diseases, Kyowa and miRagen, grants or funds from MEDA, and PLCG1 mutation patent. O.E.A. reports advisory roles for Trillium Therapeutics, Bioniz, Kyowa Kirin and Meivir, and research grants or funds from Actelion, Adaptive Biotechnology, Trillium Therapeutics, Pfizer and Kyowa Kirin. J.T. reports research funding from Takeda, Celgene, Roche, Beigene, Janssen and PCYC. M.W. reports honoraria from Takeda and Kyowa Kirin, and research grants or funds from Millennium. J.W. reports advisory roles for Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Servier, Amgen, BMS, Abbvie, Novartis and Gilead, honoraria from Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Servier, Amgen, Abbvie, Gilead and Novartis, grants or funds from Roche, GSK/Novartis, Takeda and Janssen-Cilag, and conference travel support from Roche. A.A.G. reports advisory roles for Seagen, Innate Pharma and StemLine Therapeutics, honoraria and grants or funds from StemLine Therapeutics, and consultancy fees from Innate Pharma and StemLine. L.B. reports employment for Zymeworks. M.C.P-W., J.L. and M.O. report employment for and ownership of stocks/shares from Seagen. V.B. reports employment for Takeda Pharmaceuticals. M.L. reports employment for and ownership of stocks/shares from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. W.L.T. reports employment for and ownership of stocks/shares from Takeda Pharmaceuticals. R.D. reports intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships with Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dhome (MSD), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Catalym, Second Genome, Regeneron and Alligator. S.W., R.S., P.W., K.T., and M.M. have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Brentuximab vedotin was approved for adult patients with CD30-expressing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma treated with prior systemic therapy based on improved response rates and progression-free survival with brentuximab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks; ≤16 cycles) versus physician's choice (methotrexate/bexarotene; ≤48 weeks) in the phase III ALCANZA study. Quality of life (QoL) in ALCANZA patients was also examined., Methods: QoL measures in ALCANZA were based on the Skindex-29, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and European QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires., Results: Mean maximum reduction from the baseline Skindex-29 symptom domain score (key secondary end-point) was greater with brentuximab vedotin than physician's choice (-27.96 versus -8.62); the difference, -18.9 (95% confidence interval -26.6, -11.2; adjusted p < 0.001), exceeded the study-defined minimally important difference (9.0-12.3). Mean changes from baseline to end-of-treatment visit total FACT-G scores were similar with brentuximab vedotin and physician's choice (0.15 versus -2.29). EQ-5D changes were also comparable between arms. Among brentuximab vedotin-treated patients with peripheral neuropathy (PN), mean maximum reduction in Skindex-29 symptom domain was -35.54 versus -11.11 in patients without PN. PN had no meaningful effect on FACT-G and EQ-5D QoL scores., Conclusions: In summary, brentuximab vedotin produced superior reductions in symptom burden compared with physician's choice, without adversely impacting QoL. QoL was unaffected by the presence of PN in brentuximab vedotin-treated patients., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01578499., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement S.W., P.W., J.A.S. and L.G. declare no conflicts of interest. R.D. reports intermittent, project-focused consulting and/or advisory relationships with Novartis, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma and Sanofi. H.M.P. reports consultancy, advisory roles or honoraria from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Celgene and Eisai, and research funding from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. S.M.H. reports consultancy or advisory roles from Affimed, Aileron Therapeutics, Merck Sharp and Dome, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Celgene, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Millennium, Innate Pharma, Verastem, Miragen Therapeutics, Inc. and Seattle Genetics, and research funding from ADCT Therapeutics, Aileron, Forty-Seven, Infinity/Verastem, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Seattle Genetics, Inc., Celgene and Trillium. M.D. reports research funding and consultancy from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, and Seattle Genetics, Inc. J.S. reports consultancy or advisory roles from Helsinn, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Innate Pharma, 4SC and Mallinckrodt. P.Q. reports advisory roles from 4SC, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Therakos, Innate Pharma and Kyowa Hakko Kirin. P.L.Z. reports consultancy, advisory and/or speakers bureau roles from Verastem, Celltrion, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Servier, Sandoz, Merck Sharp & Dhome, Immune Design, Celgene, Portola, Roche, EUSA Pharma, Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Sanofi. H.E. reports consultancy or advisory roles from Genentech, Roche, AbbVie and Pharmacyclics, honoraria from Genentech, Roche, AbbVie, Pharmacyclics and Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and research funding from Genentech, Roche, AbbVie, Pharmacyclics, ATARA and Celgene. L.P.B. reports consultancy fees and honoraria from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. P.L.O.R. reports travel support from Janssen and Almirall, research support from MEDA, advisory roles from Takeda, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Actelion, 4SC, Innate Pharma and MiRagen, and a patent on the clinical use of PLCG1 mutation detection. O.E.A. reports consultancy or advisory roles from Trillium Therapeutics and Bioniz, and research funding from Trillium Therapeutics and Pfizer. A.H. reports advisory board participation from Precision Oncology. J.W. reports an advisory role for Roche, Celgene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Janssen-Cilag, Servier, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte and Abbvie, research funding from Roche, GSK/Novartis, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Janssen-Cilag, honoraria from Roche, Celgene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Janssen-Cilag and Servier, and conference travel support from Roche. Y.W., J.L., A.R. and J.F. report employment and stock ownership from Seattle Genetics, Inc. Y.Z., V.B., M.L., E.Z. and M.R.D. report employment from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Y.H.K. reports honoraria from Eisai, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Seattle Genetics, Inc., Medivir, Innate Pharma, Portola and Corvus, and research funding from Eisai, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Merck Sharp & Dhome, Horizon, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Seattle Genetics, Inc., Soligenix, MiRagen, Forty-Seven, Neumedicine, Innate Pharma, Portola, Trillium, Galderma and Elorac., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: In a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, treatment with idelalisib, a phosphoinositol-3 kinase δ inhibitor, + bendamustine/rituximab improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in adult patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL). Here we report the results of health-related quality of life (HRQL) analyses from this study., Methods: From June 15, 2012 to August 21, 2014, 416 patients with R/R CLL were enrolled; 207 patients were randomized to the idelalisib arm and 209 to the placebo arm. In the 416 patients randomized to receive bendamustine/rituximab and either oral idelalisib 150 mg twice-daily or placebo, HRQL was assessed at baseline and throughout the blinded part of the study using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) and EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaires. The assessments were performed at scheduled patient visits; every 4 weeks for the first 6 months from the initiation of treatment, then every 8 weeks for the next 6 months, and every 12 weeks thereafter until end of study. Least-squares mean changes from baseline were estimated using a mixed-effects model by including treatment, time, and treatment-by-time interaction, and stratification factors as fixed effects. Time to first symptom improvement was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis., Results: In mixed-effects model analysis, idelalisib + bendamustine/rituximab treatment led to clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in leukemia-associated symptoms. Moreover, per Kaplan-Meier analysis, the proportion of patients with symptom improvement was higher and time to improvement was shorter among patients in the idelalisib-containing arm compared with those who did not receive idelalisib. The physical and social/family FACT-Leu subscale scores, along with the self-rated health assessed by EQ-VAS, showed improvement with idelalisib over placebo, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The functional and emotional FACT-Leu subscale scores remained similar to placebo., Conclusions: Addition of idelalisib to bendamustine/rituximab, apart from improving PFS and OS, had a neutral to beneficial impact on HRQL in patients with R/R CLL, particularly by reducing leukemia-specific disease symptoms., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01569295. Registered April 3, 2012.

The utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in distinguishing Richter's transformation versus chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression after ibrutinib and/or idelalisib was assessed in a post hoc analysis of a phase II study of venetoclax. Patients underwent PET-CT at screening and were not enrolled/treated if Richter's transformation was confirmed pathologically. Of 167 patients screened, 57 met criteria for biopsy after PET-CT. Of 35 patients who underwent biopsy, eight had Richter's transformation, two had another malignancy, and 25 had CLL. A PET-CT maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥10 had 71% sensitivity and 50% specificity for detecting Richter's transformation [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.5, 95%CI: 0.4-15; P =0.318]. Response rate to venetoclax was similar for screening SUVmax <10 versus ≥10 (65% vs. 62%) (n=127 enrolled), though median progression-free survival was longer at <10 months (24.7 vs. 15.4 months; P =0.0335). Six patients developed Richter's transformation on venetoclax, of whom two had screening biopsy demonstrating CLL (others did not have a biopsy) and five had screening SUVmax <10. We have defined the test characteristics for PET-CT to distinguish progression of CLL as compared to Richter's transformation when biopsied in patients treated with B-cell receptor signaling pathway inhibitors. Overall diminished sensitivity and specificity as compared to prior reports of patients treated with chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy suggest it has diminished ability to discriminate these two diagnoses using a SUVmax ≥10 cutoff. This cutoff did not identify venetoclax-treated patients with an inferior response but may be predictive of inferior progression-free survival. (Registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 02141282 )., (Copyright© 2019 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)

Purpose of This Review: This review summarizes the role of BCL-2 in the pathogenesis of CLL, and the clinical data evaluating safety and efficacy of venetoclax, in treatment of patients with CLL, in the context of other available targeted agents., Recent Findings: Venetoclax, alone or in combination with other targeted agents results in high rate of durable responses and undetectable measurable residual disease. Venetoclax maintains activity across all clinical and biologic subgroups, including those with high risk disease, including CLL with chromosome 17p deletion. TLS risk can be mitigated with risk stratification and five-week administration ramp-up schedule. Venetoclax, a novel, orally bioavailable inhibitor of BCL-2 has demonstrated substantial clinical activity in the treatment of CLL. In combination with other targeted agents it can induce high disease response rates and potentially lead to MRD-negative durable remissions.

Purpose: A randomized, double-blind, phase III study of idelalisib (IDELA) plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was terminated early because of superior efficacy of the IDELA-plus-rituximab (IDELA/R) arm. Patients in either arm could then enroll in an extension study to receive IDELA monotherapy. Here, we report the long-term efficacy and safety data for IDELA-treated patients across the primary and extension studies., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive rituximab in combination with either IDELA 150 mg twice daily (IDELA/R; n = 110) or placebo (placebo/R; n = 110). Key end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety., Results: The long-term efficacy and safety of treatment with IDELA was assessed in 110 patients who received at least one dose of IDELA in the primary study, 75 of whom enrolled in the extension study. The IDELA/R-to-IDELA group had a median PFS of 20.3 months (95% CI, 17.3 to 26.3 months) after a median follow-up time of 18 months (range, 0.3 to 67.6 months). The ORR was 85.5% (94 of 110 patients; n = 1 complete response). The median OS was 40.6 months (95% CI, 28.5 to 57.3 months) and 34.6 months (95% CI, 16.0 months to not reached) for patients randomly assigned to the IDELA/R and placebo/R groups, respectively. Prolonged exposure to IDELA increased the incidence of all-grade, grade 2, and grade 3 or greater diarrhea (46.4%, 17.3%, and 16.4%, respectively), all-grade and grade 3 or greater colitis (10.9% and 8.2%, respectively) and all-grade and grade 3 or greater pneumonitis (10.0% and 6.4%, respectively) but did not increase the incidence of elevated hepatic aminotransferases., Conclusion: IDELA improved PFS and OS compared with rituximab alone in patients with relapsed CLL. Long-term IDELA was effective and had an expected safety profile. No new IDELA-related adverse events were identified with longer exposure.

Background: Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are rare non-Hodgkin lymphomas with substantial morbidity and mortality in advanced disease stages. We compared the efficacy of mogamulizumab, a novel monoclonal antibody directed against C-C chemokine receptor 4, with vorinostat in patients with previously treated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma., Methods: In this open-label, international, phase 3, randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients with relapsed or refractory mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome at 61 medical centres in the USA, Denmark, France, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, Japan, and Australia. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years (in Japan, ≥20 years), had failed (for progression or toxicity as assessed by the principal investigator) at least one previous systemic therapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 1 or less and adequate haematological, hepatic, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice web response system to mogamulizumab (1·0 mg/kg intravenously on a weekly basis for the first 28-day cycle, then on days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles) or vorinostat (400 mg daily). Stratification was by cutaneous T-cell lymphoma subtype (mycosis fungoides vs Sézary syndrome) and disease stage (IB-II vs III-IV). Since this study was open label, patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by investigator assessment in the intention-to-treat population. Patients who received one or more doses of study drug were included in the safety analyses. This study is ongoing, and enrolment is complete. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01728805., Findings: Between Dec 12, 2012, and Jan 29, 2016, 372 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive mogamulizumab (n=186) or vorinostat (n=186), comprising the intention-to-treat population. Two patients randomly assigned to mogamulizumab withdrew consent before receiving study treatment; thus, 370 patients were included in the safety population. Mogamulizumab therapy resulted in superior investigator-assessed progression-free survival compared with vorinostat therapy (median 7·7 months [95% CI 5·7-10·3] in the mogamulizumab group vs 3·1 months [2·9-4·1] in the vorinostat group; hazard ratio 0·53, 95% CI 0·41-0·69; stratified log-rank p<0·0001). Grade 3-4 adverse events of any cause were reported in 75 (41%) of 184 patients in the mogamulizumab group and 76 (41%) of 186 patients in the vorinostat group. The most common serious adverse events of any cause were pyrexia in eight (4%) patients and cellulitis in five (3%) patients in the mogamulizumab group; and cellulitis in six (3%) patients, pulmonary embolism in six (3%) patients, and sepsis in five (3%) patients in the vorinostat group. Two (67%) of three on-treatment deaths with mogamulizumab (due to sepsis and polymyositis) and three (33%) of nine on-treatment deaths with vorinostat (two due to pulmonary embolism and one due to bronchopneumonia) were considered treatment-related., Interpretation: Mogamulizumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with vorinostat, and could provide a new, effective treatment for patients with mycosis fungoides and, importantly, for Sézary syndrome, a subtype that represents a major therapeutic challenge in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma., Funding: Kyowa Kirin., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

B-cell receptor pathway inhibitors (BCRis) have transformed treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); however, the efficacy of therapies for patients whose disease is refractory to/relapses after (R/R) BCRis is unknown. Venetoclax is a selective, orally bioavailable BCL-2 inhibitor with activity in patients with CLL, including those who are heavily pretreated or have 17p deletion. This phase 2 study prospectively evaluated venetoclax in patients with R/R CLL after ibrutinib or idelalisib; here we report on patients who received idelalisib as the last BCRi before enrollment. Venetoclax was initiated at 20 mg daily, followed by intrapatient ramp-up to 400 mg daily. Primary objectives included efficacy (objective response rate [ORR]) and safety of venetoclax. The study enrolled 36 patients who previously received idelalisib (ORR, 67% [24/36]); 2 patients achieved complete remission, and 1 had complete remission with incomplete bone marrow recovery. Median progression-free survival (PFS) has not yet been reached; estimated 12-month PFS was 79%. The most common adverse events (AEs; all grades) were neutropenia (56%), diarrhea (42%), upper respiratory tract infection (39%), thrombocytopenia (36%), nausea (31%), fatigue (28%), cough (22%), rash (22%), and anemia (22%). Grade 3 or 4 AEs were primarily hematologic (neutropenia [50%], thrombocytopenia [25%], and anemia [17%]). No patients experienced tumor lysis syndrome. Venetoclax demonstrated promising clinical activity and favorable tolerability in patients with CLL whose disease progressed during or after idelalisib therapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02141282., (© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Purpose: Everolimus inhibits mTOR, a component of PI3K/AKT prosurvival signaling triggered by MYD88 and CXCR4-activating mutations in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Experimental design: We evaluated everolimus in a prospective, multicenter study of 33 symptomatic, previously untreated Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients. Intended therapy consisted of everolimus (10 mg/day) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose deescalation was permitted. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00976248). Results: At best response, median serum IgM levels declined from 4,440 to 1,360 mg/dL ( P < 0.0001), median hemoglobin rose from 10.8 to 12 g/dL ( P = 0.001), and median bone marrow disease burden declined from 75% to 52.5% in serially biopsied patients. The ORR and major response rates were 72.7% and 60.6%, respectively. Among genotyped patients, nonresponders associated with wild-type MYD88 and mutated CXCR4 status. Median time to response was 4 weeks. Discordance between serum IgM levels and bone marrow disease burden was remarkable. With a median follow-up of 13.1 (range, 1.6-64.6 months), the median time to progression was 21 months for all patients and 33 months for major responders. Discontinuation of everolimus led to rapid serum IgM rebound in 7 patients and symptomatic hyperviscosity in 2 patients. Toxicity led to treatment discontinuation in 27% of patients, including 18% for pneumonitis. Conclusions: Everolimus is active in previously untreated Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. IgM discordance is common, and treatment cessation can often lead to rapid serum IgM rebound. Pneumonitis also appears more pronounced in untreated versus previously treated Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients. The risks and benefits of everolimus should be carefully weighed against other primary Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia therapy options. Clin Cancer Res; 23(10); 2400-4. ©2016 AACR ., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Obinutuzumab is a type 2, glycoengineered, anti-CD20 antibody recently approved with chlorambucil for the initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this nonrandomized, parallel-cohort, phase 1b, multicenter study, we explored the safety and preliminary efficacy of obinutuzumab-bendamustine (G-B) or obinutuzumab fludarabine cyclophosphamide (G-FC) for the therapy of previously untreated fit patients with CLL. Patients received up to 6 cycles of G-B (n = 20) or G-FC (n = 21). The primary end point was safety, with infusion-related reactions (88%, grade 3-4 20%) being the most common adverse event and grade 3-4 neutropenia in 55% on G-B and 48% on G-FC. Mean cycles completed were 5.7 for G-B and 5.1 for G-FC, with 2 and 7 early discontinuations, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) for G-B was 90% (18/20) with 20% complete response (CR) and 25% CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi). The ORR for G-FC was 62% (13/21), with 10% CR and 14% CRi, including 4 patients not evaluable. With a median follow-up of 23.5 months in the G-B cohort and 20.7 months in the G-FC cohort, no patient has relapsed or died. We conclude that obinutuzumab with either B or FC shows manageable toxicity and has promising activity. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01300247., (© 2015 by The American Society of Hematology.)

We evaluated the safety and biologic activity of the BH3 mimetic protein, navitoclax, combined with rituximab, in comparison to rituximab alone. One hundred and eighteen patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were randomized to receive eight weekly doses of rituximab (arm A), eight weekly doses of rituximab plus daily navitoclax for 12 weeks (arm B) or eight weekly doses of rituximab plus daily navitoclax until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm C). Investigator-assessed overall response rates (complete [CR] and partial [PR]) were 35% (arm A), 55% (arm B, p = 0.19 vs. A) and 70% (arm C, p = 0.0034 vs. A). Patients with del(17p) or high levels of BCL2 had significantly better clinical responses when treated with navitoclax. Navitoclax in combination with rituximab was well tolerated as initial therapy for patients with CLL, yielded higher response rates than rituximab alone and resulted in prolonged progression-free survival with treatment beyond 12 weeks.

Background: Patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have clinically significant coexisting medical conditions are less able to undergo standard chemotherapy. Effective therapies with acceptable side-effect profiles are needed for this patient population., Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of idelalisib, an oral inhibitor of the delta isoform of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, in combination with rituximab versus rituximab plus placebo. We randomly assigned 220 patients with decreased renal function, previous therapy-induced myelosuppression, or major coexisting illnesses to receive rituximab and either idelalisib (at a dose of 150 mg) or placebo twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival. At the first prespecified interim analysis, the study was stopped early on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board owing to overwhelming efficacy., Results: The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the placebo group and was not reached in the idelalisib group (hazard ratio for progression or death in the idelalisib group, 0.15; P<0.001). Patients receiving idelalisib versus those receiving placebo had improved rates of overall response (81% vs. 13%; odds ratio, 29.92; P<0.001) and overall survival at 12 months (92% vs. 80%; hazard ratio for death, 0.28; P=0.02). Serious adverse events occurred in 40% of the patients receiving idelalisib and rituximab and in 35% of those receiving placebo and rituximab., Conclusions: The combination of idelalisib and rituximab, as compared with placebo and rituximab, significantly improved progression-free survival, response rate, and overall survival among patients with relapsed CLL who were less able to undergo chemotherapy. (Funded by Gilead; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01539512.).