Background: In high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC), determination of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status is commonly used in routine practice to predict response to platinum-based therapy or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Here we tested the hypothesis that BRCA loss of function (LOF) due to epigenetic or genetic aberrations is a better predictor for the clinical outcome than HRD. One hundred thirty-one HGOC tissues were tested for BRCA DNA-methylation, BRCA mutations, HRD and BRCA1 mRNA expression, followed by a comprehensive survival analysis., Results: BRCA1-methylation was detected in 11% of the tumors, exclusively in BRCA1-wild-type (wt) HGOCs. BRCA1-methylated tumors (BRCA1-meth) had HRD-scores similar to those of BRCA-mutated (mut) tumors, and higher compared to unmethylated-BRCA-wt tumors (BRCA-wt-unmeth; P < 0.001). Platinum-refractory or -resistant HGOCs at first recurrence were all BRCA-unmeth cancers. Only one of the BRCA-mut cancers had a platinum-resistant recurrence. Thus, 99% of relapses in cancers with epigenetic or genetic BRCA-alterations were platinum-sensitive. Multivariate analysis confirmed BRCA-LOF as an independent predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), whereas HRD-status had no predictive value for PFS and OS. Patients with BRCA-wt-unmeth cancers had the worst outcome compared to patients with cancers harboring epigenetic or genetic BRCA-alterations (PFS: P = 0.007; OS: P = 0.022). Most importantly, the BRCA-wt-unmeth subfraction of HRD-positive HGOCs exhibited the same poor survival as the entire HRD-negative cohort., Conclusion: In HGOC BRCA mutational status together with BRCA1-methylation exhibit the best predictive power for favorable clinical outcome and thus high sensitivity to platinum-based therapy, whereas BRCA-unrelated HRD positivity was not associated with improved platinum sensitivity., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Innsbruck Medical University (reference numbers: AN2015-0038 346/4.17; 1054/2019) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki Principles Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. However, the following authors receive financial support for the specified activities: KL reports travel expenses from GSK, Roche, Eisai and MSD. IT reports honoraria from Roche and Astra Zeneca; travel expenses from Eisai, GSK, PharmaMar, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer; participation on advisory boards from Astra Zeneca. VW reports honoraria from Roche, Novartis; travel expenses from Roche; participation on advisory boards from Novartis. CM reports consulting fees from Roche, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, PharmaMar, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Seagen; honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, PharmaMar, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Seagen; travel expenses from Roche, Astra Zeneca; participation on advisory boards from Roche, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, PharmaMar, GSK, Seagen. AGZ reports consulting fees from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, GSK, MSD, Novartis, PharmaMar, Roche-Diagnostics, Seagen; honoraria from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, GSK, MSD, Novartis, PharmaMar, Roche, Seagen; travel expenses from Astra Zeneca, Gilead, Roche; participation on advisory boards from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, Seagen., (© 2024. The Author(s).)