Search

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and the associated infectious disease COVID-19 pose a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Patients with cancer have been identified as a high-risk population for severe infections, rendering prophylaxis and treatment strategies for these patients particularly important. Rapidly evolving clinical research, resulting in the recent advent of various vaccines and therapeutic agents against COVID-19, offers new options to improve care and protection of cancer patients. However, ongoing epidemiological changes and rise of new virus variants require repeated revisions and adaptations of prophylaxis and treatment strategies to meet these new challenges. Therefore, this guideline provides an update on evidence-based recommendations with regard to vaccination, pharmacological prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 in cancer patients in light of the currently dominant omicron variants. It was developed by an expert panel of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) based on a critical review of the most recent available data.

Tigecycline has been used to treat patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of tigecycline as salvage treatment of FN. Patients records from 09/2004 to 04/2019 were reviewed. Cases were eligible if fever persisted/recurred (p/r-FN) after 3 days of second-line treatment with a carbapenem, and were divided into three groups: switch to tigecycline (TGC group), switch to other antibiotics (OAB group), and no switch (W&W group). The primary endpoint was response rate (defervescence for ≥ 7 days or at least until discharge); the key secondary endpoint was 30-day mortality rate. Two hundred cases from 176 patients (median 59 years; 53.5% men) treated were included, mostly acute myeloid leukaemias (61.0%). 45.5% of cases were in the TGC group (in combination with an anti-pseudomonal antibiotic, mostly ceftazidime [95.6%]); 35.5% were in the OAB and 19.0% in the W&W group. There was no significant difference in response rates (TGC, 73.6%; OAB, 62.0%; W&W, 78.9%; p = 0.12) or 30-day mortality rates (TGC, 7.7%; OAB, 7.0%; W&W, 5.3%; p = 0.94). Tigecycline plus an anti-pseudomonal antibiotic does not improve response or 30-day mortality rate compared to other antibiotics in patients with p/r-FN. Also, in some cases, no switch in antibiotics may be necessary at all.

Purpose: Cell-to-cell variability in apoptosis signaling contributes to heterogenic responses to cytotoxic stress in clinically heterogeneous neoplasia, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The BCL-2 proteins BAX and BAK can commit mammalian cells to apoptosis and are inhibited by retrotranslocation from the mitochondria into the cytosol. The subcellular localization of BAX and BAK could determine the cellular predisposition to apoptotic death.Experimental Design: The relative localization of BAX and BAK was determined by fractionation of AML cell lines and patient samples of a test cohort and a validation cohort.Results: This study shows that relative BAX localization determines the predisposition of different AML cell lines to apoptosis. Human AML displays a surprising variety of relative BAX localizations. In a test cohort of 48 patients with AML, mitochondria-shifted BAX correlated with improved patient survival, FLT3-ITD status, and leukocytosis. Analysis of a validation cohort of 80 elderly patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy confirmed that relative BAX localization correlates with probability of disease progression, FLT3-ITD status, and leukocytosis. Relative BAX localization could therefore be helpful to identify elderly or frail patients who may benefit from cytotoxic therapy.Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of two independent AML cohorts, our data suggest that Bax localization may predict prognosis of patients with AML and cellular predisposition to apoptosis, combining the actual contribution of known and unknown factors to a final “common path.” Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4805–16. ©2017 AACR.

S1 BAX/BAK localization for the test cohort S2 clinical characterization of patient cohorts S3 GISTIC analysis of the test cohort S4 BAX/BAK localization for the validation cohort S5 Multivariate analysis of variance for human AML survival probablity

Objective: Neutropenia is an adverse event commonly arising during intensive chemotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It is often associated with infectious complications. Mathematical modeling, simulation, and optimization of the treatment process would be a valuable tool to support clinical decision making, potentially resulting in less severe side effects and deeper remissions. However, until now, there has been no validated mathematical model available to simulate the effect of chemotherapy treatment on white blood cell (WBC) counts and leukemic cells simultaneously. Methods: We developed a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model combining a myelosuppression model considering endogenous granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), a PK model for cytarabine (Ara-C), a subcutaneous absorption model for exogenous G-CSF, and a two-compartment model for leukemic blasts. This model was fitted to data of 44 AML patients during consolidation therapy with a novel Ara-C plus G-CSF schedule from a phase II controlled clinical trial. Additionally, we were able to optimize treatment schedules with respect to disease progression, WBC nadirs, and the amount of Ara-C and G-CSF. Results: The developed PK/PD model provided good prediction accuracies and an interpretation of the interaction between WBCs, G-CSF, and blasts. For 14 patients (those with available bone marrow blast counts), we achieved a median 4.2-fold higher WBC count at nadir, which is the most critical time during consolidation therapy. The simulation results showed that relative bone marrow blast counts remained below the clinically important threshold of 5%, with a median of 60% reduction in Ara-C. Conclusion: These in silico findings demonstrate the benefits of optimized treatment schedules for AML patients. Significance: Until 2017, no new drug had been approved for the treatment of AML, fostering the optimal use of currently available drugs.

Since its first detection in China in late 2019 the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and the associated infectious disease COVID-19 continue to have a major impact on global health care and clinical practice. Cancer patients, in particular those with haematological malignancies, seem to be at an increased risk for a severe course of infection. Deliberations to avoid or defer potentially immunosuppressive therapies in these patients need to be balanced against the overarching goal of providing optimal antineoplastic treatment. This poses a unique challenge to treating physicians. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding prevention, diagnostics and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 as well as strategies towards safe antineoplastic care during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was prepared by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) by critically reviewing the currently available data on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in cancer patients applying evidence-based medicine criteria., Highlights • Cancer patients are vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19. • Comprehensive management strategies are required in care for cancer patients. • Evidence-based recommendations help clinicians make informed treatment decisions. • Providing state-of-the-art cancer care is possible during COVID-19 pandemic.

ZusammenfassungWeichteilsarkome sind eine heterogene Gruppe von Tumoren mesenchymalen Ursprungs, die teilweise ein sehr unterschiedliches biologisches Verhalten zeigen. Retroperitoneale Weichteilsarkome (RSTS) machen 10 – 15% aller Weichteilsarkome aus. Behandlungsempfehlungen für RSTS basieren auf vorrangig retrospektiven Analysen mit geringer Evidenz, die in dieser Übersichtsarbeit dargestellt werden. Zentraler Pfeiler in der Behandlung des lokalisierten, nicht metastasierten RSTS ist die chirurgische Resektion im Sinne einer Kompartment-Resektion. Ziel ist dabei immer die allseitig vollständige Tumorentfernung mit mikroskopisch freien Resektionsrändern. Ist das Erreichen dieses Behandlungsziels mit der alleinigen Kompartment-Resektion fraglich oder besteht eine hohe Wahrscheinlichkeit für eine lokale Tumorrekurrenz bei high-grade Sarkomen, so sollte eine neoadjuvante Bestrahlung, gegebenenfalls mit intraoperativem Boost, im Rahmen eines multimodalen Therapieansatzes durchgeführt werden. Die in Analogie zu den Extremitätensarkomen zu favorisierende Anthrazyklin-basierte Chemotherapie hat ihren Stellenwert vorrangig in der Adjuvanz. Auch wenn ein onkologischer Vorteil durch eine adjuvante Chemotherapie für RSTS bisher nicht nachgewiesen ist, sollte bei high-grade Sarkomen die Indikation diskutiert werden. In Kenntnis der unterschiedlichen Krankheitsverläufe werden zunehmend an die unterschiedlichen histologischen Subtypen adaptierte Therapiekonzepte diskutiert und in Studien untersucht. Valide Empfehlungen lassen sich jedoch bisher nicht ableiten. Die Behandlung von RSTS-Patienten wie überhaupt von Patienten mit Sarkomen in Zentren mit entsprechender Expertise ist mit einer signifikanten Verbesserung der Prognose assoziiert und ist unbedingt anzustreben.

Annals of hematology 101(10), 2317-2324 (2022). doi:10.1007/s00277-022-04958-w, Published by Springer, Berlin

Despite bendamustine-rituximab (BR) showed disappointing efficacy in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), it is still occasionally used as first-line treatment in older DLBCL patients instead of recommended R-CHOP. This multicentre, retrospective study was aimed to clarify circumstances in which BR may be justified in this setting. Patients ≥ 65 years with ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2 or ≥ 75 years regardless of PS were included. A total of 140 patients were analysed (BR, 68; R-CHOP, 72). BR patients were older (p < 0.001) and were diagnosed more often with high-risk disease (p = 0.03); no difference regarding comorbidities or PS was seen. Compared with R-CHOP, BR was associated with marked inferior overall survival (OS) (16.3 vs. 75.4 months; p = 0.006) and progression-free survival (PFS) (11.0 vs. 62.3 months; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only high age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aaCCI) was associated with inferior PFS in R-CHOP patients (hazard ratio 2.67; p = 0.012). Comparing the subgroup of BR and R-CHOP patients with high aaCCI, there was no difference in OS (p = 0.73) or PFS (p = 0.75). Due to the observed non-superiority of R-CHOP in older DLBCL patients with comorbidities, we propose that this subgroup may be treated alternatively with BR, whereas all other older patients are clearly R-CHOP candidates.

This non-interventional, prospective phase IV trial evaluated trabectedin in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in real-life clinical practice across Germany. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 3 and 6 months, as defined by investigators. Overall, 128 patients from 19 German sites were evaluated for efficacy and 130 for safety. Median age was 58.5 years (range: 23–84) and leiomyosarcoma was the most frequent histotype (n = 45; 35.2%). Trabectedin was mostly used as second/third-line treatment (n = 91; 71.1%). Median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 3.3–6.7), with 60.7% and 44.5% of patients free from progression at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Median overall survival was 15.2 months (95% CI: 9.6–21.4). One patient achieved a complete and 14 patients a partial response, conferring an objective response rate of 11.7%. Decreases in white blood cells (27.0% of patients), platelets (16.2%) and neutrophils (13.1%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (10.8%) were the most common trabectedin-related grade 3/4 adverse drug reactions. Two deaths due to pneumonia and sepsis were considered trabectedin-related. Trabectedin confers clinically meaningful activity in patients with multiple STS histotypes, comparable to that previously observed in clinical trials and other non-interventional studies, and with a manageable safety profile.

Cancer patients frequently require central venous catheters for therapy and parenteral nutrition and are at high risk of central venous catheter–related infections (CRIs). Moreover, CRIs prolong hospitalization, cause an excess in resource utilization and treatment cost, often delay anti-cancer treatment, and are associated with a significant increase in mortality in cancer patients. We therefore summoned a panel of experts by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) and updated our previous guideline on CRIs in cancer patients. After conducting systematic literature searches on PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases, video- and meeting-based consensus discussions were held. In the presented guideline, we summarize recommendations on definition, diagnosis, management, and prevention of CRIs in cancer patients including the grading of strength of recommendations and the respective levels of evidence. This guideline supports clinicians and researchers alike in the evidence-based decision-making in the management of CRIs in cancer patients.

Sepsis and septic shock are major causes of mortality during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia for malignancies requiring urgent treatment. Thus, awareness of the presenting characteristics and prompt management is most important. Improved management of sepsis during neutropenia may reduce the mortality of cancer therapies. However, optimal management may differ between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients. The aim of the current guideline is to give evidence-based recommendations for hematologists, oncologists, and intensive care physicians on how to manage adult patients with neutropenia and sepsis.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with dismal prognosis. Data regarding long-term survival are well-known and rather disappointing with a m...

Isavuconazole is a novel antifungal drug approved for the treatment of adults with invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. While azoles as a class effect are known to prolong QTc interval, clinical trials have shown that isavuconazole administration may cause shortening in a dose-related manner. Here, we assessed the effects of isavuconazole on the length of QTc interval. The objective of the study was to describe changes in the QTc interval induced by isavuconazole treatment. A total of 26 adult patients from 7 hospitals were included. Patients received isavuconazole for the treatment of invasive fungal infection and, in 1 case, for prophylaxis due to QTc prolongation under fluconazole. Twelve-channel electrocardiograms (ECGs) were performed before and during treatment. Out of 26 patients, 24 showed shortening of QTc interval. In patients with QTc shortening, QTc during isavuconazole treatment showed a mean decrease of 7.4 +/- 5.8% (36.5 +/- 38.8ms, range 7-202; P=.004), compared to pre-isavuconazole ECG. One patient with available long-term follow-up showed further decrease in QTc on days 55 and 110. Apart from 1 case report, these are the first data outside controlled clinical trials showing QTc shortening. Knowledge about cardiac effects of isavuconazole will serve to better manage the use of concomitant medications.

Summary Gut colonization with multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria enhances the risk of bloodstream infections in susceptible individuals. We demonstrate highly variable degrees of ex vivo colonization resistance against a carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain in human feces samples and subsequently isolate diverse K. oxytoca strains from protected donors. Several of these K. oxytoca strains reduce gut colonization of MDR K. pneumoniae strains in antibiotic-treated and gnotobiotic mouse models. Comparative analysis of K. oxytoca strains coupled with CRISPR-Cas9-mediated deletion of casA, a protein essential for utilization of selected beta-glucosides, identified competition for specific carbohydrates as key in promoting colonization resistance. In addition to direct competition between K. oxytoca and K. pneumoniae, cooperation with additional commensals is required to reestablish full colonization resistance and gut decolonization. Finally, humanized microbiota mice generated from K. pneumoniae-susceptible donors are protected by K. oxytoca administration, demonstrating the potential of commensal K. oxytoca strains as next-generation probiotics.

Cancer patients frequently suffer from gastrointestinal complications. In this manuscript, we update our 2013 guideline on the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in adult cancer patients by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). An expert group was put together by the AGIHO to update the existing guideline. For each sub-topic, a literature search was performed in PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases, and strengths of recommendation and the quality of the published evidence for major therapeutic strategies were categorized using the 2015 European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) criteria. Final recommendations were approved by the AGIHO plenary conference. Recommendations were made with respect to non-infectious and infectious gastrointestinal complications. Strengths of recommendation and levels of evidence are presented. A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in cancer patients is mandatory. Evidence-based recommendations are provided in this updated guideline.

Purpose: Cell-to-cell variability in apoptosis signaling contributes to heterogenic responses to cytotoxic stress in clinically heterogeneous neoplasia, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The BCL-2 proteins BAX and BAK can commit mammalian cells to apoptosis and are inhibited by retrotranslocation from the mitochondria into the cytosol. The subcellular localization of BAX and BAK could determine the cellular predisposition to apoptotic death. Experimental Design: The relative localization of BAX and BAK was determined by fractionation of AML cell lines and patient samples of a test cohort and a validation cohort. Results: This study shows that relative BAX localization determines the predisposition of different AML cell lines to apoptosis. Human AML displays a surprising variety of relative BAX localizations. In a test cohort of 48 patients with AML, mitochondria-shifted BAX correlated with improved patient survival, FLT3-ITD status, and leukocytosis. Analysis of a validation cohort of 80 elderly patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy confirmed that relative BAX localization correlates with probability of disease progression, FLT3-ITD status, and leukocytosis. Relative BAX localization could therefore be helpful to identify elderly or frail patients who may benefit from cytotoxic therapy. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of two independent AML cohorts, our data suggest that Bax localization may predict prognosis of patients with AML and cellular predisposition to apoptosis, combining the actual contribution of known and unknown factors to a final “common path.” Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4805–16. ©2017 AACR.

Background Advances in the survival of patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA) are jeopardized by the emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus, which has been associated with high probability of azole treatment failure. The clinical implications of azole-resistant IA compared to azole-susceptible IA remain unclear. Thus, we seek to describe the epidemiology and to determine the efficacy of antifungal therapy in patients with documented azole-resistant IA compared to azole-susceptible IA in patients with hematological malignancy. Methods For proven and probable IA (EORTC/MSG 2019) caused by A. fumigatus in patients with hematological malignancies retrospective data were documented, comprising demographics, diagnosis, treatment, response, and outcome. Sites provided susceptibility results or respective isolates for analysis in a central laboratory. Results Sites in 16 countries worldwide enrolled 187 cases diagnosed with IA between 2010 and 2019; 31 (16.6%) were resistant to at least one of the clinical azoles. Fungal isolates were available from 42 cases. A mixed fungal infection was reported for 32 patients (17.1%), most were related to non-fumigatus Aspergillus and non-Aspergillus molds (n=22, 69%). Most patients were male (66.8%) and overall the majority of patients were in the age groups between 50 and 89 years (71%). Amphotericin B was used for treatment in 24 (77%) patients with azole-resistant IA, compared to 76 (49%) in the azole-susceptible group (lipid-based formulation in 98%); only five (16%) patients with azole-resistant IA were treated with an azole alone vs. 57 (36%) of those with azole-susceptible IA. Overall, all-cause mortality rate was higher for patients with azole-resistant compared to azole-susceptible IA (74.2% vs. 53.8%, log rank P=0.004), the 8 patients with an azole-resistant IA treated in the intensive care unit died within 1 month (Figure 1). Details on underlying disease and survival are given in Table 1. Table 1. Underlying hematological malignancy and clinical outcome of patients with azole-resistant and azole-susceptible invasive aspergillosis Figure 1. Intensive care unit 1-year survival probability for patients with azole-resistant and azole-susceptible invasive aspergillosis Conclusion Azole-resistance in IA is associated with worse outcome, especially in critically ill patients. Susceptibility testing should be considered in patients with a suspected azole-resistant IA to support treatment decisions. Disclosures Danila Seidel, PhD, Basilea (Other Financial or Material Support, travel grant) Oliver Cornely, Prof., Actelion (Grant/Research Support)Actelion (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Al Jazeera Pharmaceuticals (Consultant)Allecra Therapeutics (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Amplyx (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Amplyx (Grant/Research Support)Astellas (Grant/Research Support)Astellas (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Basilea (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Basilea (Grant/Research Support)Biosys UK Limited (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Cidara (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Cidara (Grant/Research Support)Da Volterra (Grant/Research Support)Da Volterra (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Entasis (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)F2G (Other Financial or Material Support)F2G (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Grupo Biotoscana (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Janssen Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Matinas (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Medicines Company (Grant/Research Support)MedPace (Grant/Research Support)MedPace (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Menarini Ricerche (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Merck/MSD (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Merck/MSD (Grant/Research Support)Mylan Pharmaceuticals (Consultant)Nabriva Therapeutics (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Octapharma (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Pfizer (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support)PSI (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Rempex (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Roche Diagnostics (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Scynexis (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Scynexis (Grant/Research Support)Seres Therapeutics (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Tetraphase (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees) Philipp Koehler, MD, Akademie für Infektionsmedizin e.V., (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Astellas Pharma GmbH (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (Other Financial or Material Support, Other)Gilead Sciences GmbH (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)GPR Academy Ruesselsheim (Speaker’s Bureau)Miltenyi Biotec GmbH (Other Financial or Material Support, Non-financial support)MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Noxxon N.V. (Speaker’s Bureau)University Hospital, LMU Munich (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees) Katrien Lagrou, n/a, FUJIFILM WAKO (Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)MSD (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau, Other Financial or Material Support, travel grant)Pfizer (Speaker’s Bureau, travel grant)SMB Laboratoires Brussels (Consultant) Zdenek Racil, n/a, Astellas (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau, travel grant) Blandine Rammaert, n/a, Gilead (Speaker’s Bureau, Other Financial or Material Support, travel grant)Merck/MSD (Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Other Financial or Material Support, travel grant) Nikolay Klimko, n/a, Astellas (Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead (Speaker’s Bureau)Merck/MSD (Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Speaker’s Bureau) Sung-Yeon Cho, MD, Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck Sharp & Dohme (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)

Background Isavuconazole (ISAV) is a novel, broad-spectrum triazole antifungal, available in both intravenous and oral formulations, for the treatment of adult patients with invasive aspergillosis or mucormycosis. In this retrospective case collection study, we compared outcomes for patients with invasive mucormycosis treated with ISAV versus other systemic antifungal therapies, in order to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of ISAV. Methods Proven and probable invasive mucormycosis cases treated with ISAV for a minimum of four consecutive days between 2016 and 2019 were identified from the FungiScope® registry. Matched controls were defined as patients treated with lipid formulations of amphotericin B (lipid-AMB), posaconazole, or a combination of both, as first-line therapy between 2011 and 2019. Case-matching criteria included disease severity, presence of hematological malignancy or allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and surgery for fungal disease. Baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared descriptively. Results Each of 30 ISAV cases was matched to 1–3 controls, including 25 ISAV cases each matched to 2 or 3 controls, which resulted in a total of 69 control cases. In 70.0% of ISAV cases (n=21), ISAV was administered as a treatment for invasive mucormycosis in patients who had received prior lipid-AMB. In the remaining cases, ISAV was administered after prior voriconazole treatment (n=3) or as first-line therapy (n=6). All control patients received either lipid-AMB, posaconazole, or a combination of both. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and causative pathogens were similar between ISAV cases and controls (Table). Overall response rates (defined as achieving a complete or partial response) at the final assessment were 50.0% (15/30) for ISAV cases and 50.7% (35/69) for controls. All-cause mortality was 43.3% (13/30) in ISAV cases as compared to 46.4% (32/69) in controls (Figure). Table. Demographic and clinical characteristics of 30 isavuconazole cases and 69 control cases Figure. Clinical response at final assessment and all cause mortality for 30 isavuconazole cases and 69 control cases Conclusion In this retrospective analysis of cases from the FungiScope® registry, patients with invasive mucormycosis showed similar overall treatment response and all-cause mortality rates with ISAV compared to treatment with lipid-AMB and/or posaconazole. These data support the effectiveness of isavuconazole in clinical practice. Disclosures Danila Seidel, PhD, Basilea (Other Financial or Material Support, travel grant) Oliver Cornely, Prof., Actelion (Grant/Research Support)Actelion (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Al Jazeera Pharmaceuticals (Consultant)Allecra Therapeutics (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Amplyx (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Amplyx (Grant/Research Support)Astellas (Grant/Research Support)Astellas (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Basilea (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Basilea (Grant/Research Support)Biosys UK Limited (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Cidara (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Cidara (Grant/Research Support)Da Volterra (Grant/Research Support)Da Volterra (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Entasis (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)F2G (Other Financial or Material Support)F2G (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Grupo Biotoscana (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Janssen Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Matinas (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Medicines Company (Grant/Research Support)MedPace (Grant/Research Support)MedPace (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Menarini Ricerche (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Merck/MSD (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Merck/MSD (Grant/Research Support)Mylan Pharmaceuticals (Consultant)Nabriva Therapeutics (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Octapharma (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Pfizer (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support)PSI (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Rempex (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Roche Diagnostics (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Scynexis (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Scynexis (Grant/Research Support)Seres Therapeutics (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Tetraphase (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees) Philipp Koehler, MD, Akademie für Infektionsmedizin e.V., (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Astellas Pharma GmbH (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (Other Financial or Material Support, Other)Gilead Sciences GmbH (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)GPR Academy Ruesselsheim (Speaker’s Bureau)Miltenyi Biotec GmbH (Other Financial or Material Support, Non-financial support)MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees)Noxxon N.V. (Speaker’s Bureau)University Hospital, LMU Munich (Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees) Nikolay Klimko, n/a, Astellas (Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead (Speaker’s Bureau)Merck/MSD (Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Speaker’s Bureau) Marisa H. Miceli, MD, FIDSA, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) Martin Hoenigl, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member) Farima Barmaki-Rad, n/a, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd. (Employee) Mikael Saulay, n/a, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd. (Employee) Marc Engelhardt, n/a, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd. (Board Member, Consultant, Employee, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Shareholder, Speaker’s Bureau, Independent Contractor, Other Financial or Material Support)Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd. (Employee) Kamal Hamed, n/a, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd. (Employee)

Baseline chest computed tomography (BCT) in high-risk hematology patients allows for the early diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). The distribution of BCT implementation in hematology departments and impact on outcome is unknown. A web-based questionnaire was designed. International scientific bodies were invited. The estimated numbers of annually treated hematology patients, chest imaging timepoints and techniques, IPA rates, and follow-up imaging were assessed. In total, 142 physicians from 43 countries participated. The specialties included infectious diseases (n = 69, 49%), hematology (n = 68, 48%), and others (n = 41, 29%). BCT was performed in 57% (n = 54) of 92 hospitals. Upon the diagnosis of malignancy or admission, 48% and 24% performed BCT, respectively, and X-ray was performed in 48% and 69%, respectively. BCT was more often used in hematopoietic cell transplantation and in relapsed acute leukemia. European centers performed BCT in 59% and non-European centers in 53%. Median estimated IPA rate was 8% and did not differ between BCT (9%, IQR 5&ndash, 15%) and non-BCT centers (7%, 10%) (p = 0.69). Follow-up computed tomography (CT) for IPA was performed in 98% (n = 90) of centers. In high-risk hematology patients, baseline CT is becoming a standard-of-care. Chest X-ray, while inferior, is still widely used. Randomized, controlled trials are needed to investigate the impact of BCT on patient outcome.

Background With Sepsis-3, the increase in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) as a clinical score for the identification of patients with sepsis and quickSOFA (qSOFA) for the identification of patients at risk of sepsis outside the intensive care unit (ICU) were introduced in 2016. However, their validity has been questioned, and their applicability in different settings and subgroups, such as hematological cancer patients, remains unclear. We therefore assessed the validity of SOFA, qSOFA, and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria regarding the diagnosis of sepsis and the prediction of in-hospital mortality in a multicenter cohort of hematological cancer patients treated on ICU and non-ICU settings. Methods We retrospectively calculated SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA scores in our cohort and applied the definition of sepsis as “life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by dysregulated host response to infection” as reference. Discriminatory capacity was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results Among 450 patients with hematological cancer (median age 58 years, 274 males [61%]), 180 (40%) had sepsis of which 101 (56%) were treated on ICU. For the diagnosis of sepsis, sensitivity was 86%, 64%, and 42% for SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA, respectively. However, the AUROCs of SOFA and qSOFA indicated better discrimination for sepsis than SIRS (SOFA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.64–0.73] p

We investigate the personalisation and prediction accuracy of mathematical models for white blood cell (WBC) count dynamics during consolidation treatment using intermediate or high-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Ara-C is the clinically most relevant cytotoxic agent for AML treatment. We extend a mathematical model of myelosuppression and a pharmacokinetic model of Ara-C with different hypotheses of Ara-C's pharmacodynamic effects. We cross-validate the 12 model variations using dense WBC count measurements from 23 AML patients. Surprisingly, the prediction accuracy remains satisfactory in each of the models despite different modelling hypotheses. Therefore, we compare average clinical and calculated WBC recovery times for different Ara-C schedules as a successful methodology for model discrimination. As a result, a new hypothesis of a secondary pharmacodynamic effect on the proliferation rate seems plausible. Furthermore, we demonstrate the impact of treatment timing on subsequent nadir values based on personalised predictions as a possibility for influencing/controlling myelosuppression.

Infektionen stellen eine haufige und schwerwiegende Komplikation bei Patienten mit hamatologisch-onkologischen Erkrankungen dar, wobei das individuelle Infektionsrisiko von verschiedenen Faktoren, wie z. B. Art der antineoplastischen Therapie bestimmt wird. Zentrale Fragen sind die Bestimmung der Inzidenz von Infektionen bei hamatologisch-onkologischen Patienten sowie Beschreibungen von verursachenden Erregern und Risikofaktoren und Darstellungen von Empfehlungen zur Diagnostik und antimikrobiellen Therapie bei diesen Patienten. Es wurde eine selektive Literaturrecherche durchgefuhrt und die Expertenempfehlungen diskutiert. Infektionen konnen bei Tumorpatienten alle Organsysteme betreffen und durch Bakterien, Pilze, Viren und Parasiten verursacht sein. Neben der febrilen Neutropenie werden andere bakterielle und virale Infektionen (z. B. Herpes Zoster) haufig bei diesen Patienten beobachtet. Patienten mit Hochrisikoneutropenie (absolute Neutrophilenzahl 7 Tage) oder Empfanger einer allogenen hamatopoetischen Stammzelltransplantation weisen zudem ein erhohtes Risiko fur mykotische (z. B. pulmonale Aspergillose) sowie parasitare Infektionen (z. B. ZNS-Toxoplasmose) auf. Die Diagnostik umfasst Basismasnahmen (z. B. Entnahme von Blutkulturen) und weitere Untersuchungen, die symptomorientiert durchgefuhrt werden (z. B. Thorax-CT). In therapeutischer Hinsicht wird ein empirischer von einem praemptiven bzw. einem zielgerichtetem Therapieansatz abgegrenzt. Infektionen tragen wesentlich zur Morbiditat und Mortalitat von Patienten mit hamatologisch-onkologischen Erkrankungen bei. Die zeitgerechte Einleitung adaquater diagnostischer und therapeutischer Masnahmen ist entscheidend, um die Mortalitat bei diesen Patienten zu reduzieren.

Introduction: Infections are among the most frequent complications in patients with hematological and oncological diseases. They might be classified as fever of unknown origin and microbiologically or clinically documented infections. Optimal duration of antimicrobial treatment is still unclear in these patients.Areas covered: We provide an overview on the management of febrile neutropenia in the perspective of antimicrobial de-escalation and discontinuation.Expert opinion: Patients with febrile high-risk neutropenia should be treated empirically with an anti-pseudomonal agent such as piperacillin/tazobactam. Several clinical studies support the assumption that the primary antibiotic regimen might be safely discontinued prior to neutrophil reconstitution if the patient is afebrile for several days and all infection-related symptoms have been resolved. Primary empirical treatment with carbapenems or antibiotic combinations should commonly only be considered in selected patient subgroups, such as patients with severe neutropenic sepsis or colonization with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Preemptive antifungal treatment guided by lung imaging and other parameters (e.g. serial Aspergillus galactomannan antigen screening) might reduce the consumption of antifungals compared to the classical empirical approach.Multidrug-resistant pathogens are emerging, and novel anti-infective agents under development are scarce. Therefore, a rational use of antimicrobials based on the principles of antibiotic stewardship is crucial.

We investigate the personalisation and prediction accuracy of mathematical models for white blood cell (WBC) count dynamics during consolidation treatment using intermediate or high-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Ara-C is the clinically most relevant cytotoxic agent for AML treatment.We extend the gold-standard model of myelosuppression and a pharmacokinetic model of Ara-C with different hypotheses of Ara-C’s pharmacodynamic effects. We cross-validate 12 mathematical models using dense WBC count measurements from 23 AML patients. Surprisingly, the prediction accuracies are similarly good despite different modelling hypotheses. Therefore, we compare average clinical and calculated WBC recovery times for different Ara-C schedules as a successful methodology for model discrimination. As a result, a new hypothesis of a secondary pharmacodynamic effect on the proliferation rate seems plausible. Furthermore, we demonstrate how personalized predictions of the impact of treatment timing on subsequent nadir values could be used for clinical decision support.Author summaryThe major obstacle in accurately predicting the outcome of a medical therapy is the vast variation in individual response patterns. It concerns both the subjective experience of the patient and the objectively measurable achievement of a clinical remission with restoration of normal blood counts. Here, we address acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-chemotherapy using cytarabine (Ara-C) as this drug is this most important component of AML-treatment. In addition to the wide spectrum of genetic aberrations involved in pathogenesis leading to variations in patient response patterns, another facet of personalised medicine awaits exploration of its full potential: a systematic, mathematical approach to understand and manipulate the dynamics of relevant biomarkers. We use personalised mathematical models to describe and predict white blood cell (WBC) counts during AML consolidation treatment. We analyse why and to what extent low WBC counts, a serious adverse event during therapy, occur. In a comprehensive approach we investigate published models, compare them with our extended models and outline the impact of modelling assumptions and varying chemotherapy schedules on prediction accuracy and model discrimination. Our numerical results confirm the clinical finding that a newly proposed schedule is superior with respect to WBC recovery and shed new light on the reasons why.

The regeneration of red blood cells (RBCs) after blood loss is an individual complex process. We present a novel simple compartment model which is able to capture the most important features and can be personalized using parameter estimation. We compare predictions of the proposed and personalized model to a more sophisticated state-of-the-art model for erythropoiesis, and to clinical data from healthy subjects. We discuss the choice of model parameters with respect to identifiability. We give an outlook on how extensions of this novel mathematical model could have an important impact for personalized clinical decision support in the case of polycythemia vera (PV). PV is a slow-growing type of blood cancer, where especially the production of RBCs is increased. The principal treatment targeting the symptoms of PV is bloodletting (phlebotomy), at regular intervals that are based on personal experiences of the physicians. Model-based decision support might help to identify optimal and individualized phlebotomy schedules.