Search

Aim: This guideline (GL) is aimed at providing a reference for the management of non-functioning, benign thyroid nodules causing local symptoms in adults outside of pregnancy. Methods: This GL has been developed following the methods described in the Manual of the National Guideline System. For each question, the panel appointed by Associazione Medici Endocrinology(AME) identified potentially relevant outcomes, which were then rated for their impact on therapeutic choices. Only outcomes classified as “critical” and “important” were considered in the systematic review of evidence and only those classified as “critical” were considered in the formulation of recommendations. Results: The present GL contains recommendations about the respective roles of surgery and minimally invasive treatments for the management of benign symptomatic thyroid nodules. We suggest hemithyroidectomy plus isthmectomy as the first-choice surgical treatment, provided that clinically significant disease is not present in the contralateral thyroid lobe. Total thyroidectomy should be considered for patients with clinically significant disease in the contralateral thyroid lobe. We suggest considering thermo-ablation as an alternative option to surgery for patients with a symptomatic, solid, benign, single, or dominant thyroid nodule. These recommendations apply to outpatients, either in primary care or when referred to specialists. Conclusion: The present GL is directed to endocrinologists, surgeons, and interventional radiologists working in hospitals, in territorial services, or private practice, general practitioners, and patients. The available data suggest that the implementation of this GL recommendations will result in the progressive reduction of surgical procedures for benign thyroid nodular disease, with a decreased number of admissions to surgical departments for non-malignant conditions and more rapid access to patients with thyroid cancer. Importantly, a reduction of indirect costs due to long-term replacement therapy and the management of surgical complications may also be speculated.

Introduction: This guideline (GL) is aimed at providing a reference for the management of prolactin (PRL)-secreting pituitary adenoma in adults. However, pregnancy is not considered. Methods: This GL has been developed following the methods described in the Manual of the Italian National Guideline System. For each question, the panel appointed by Associazione Medici Endocrinologi (AME) has identified potentially relevant outcomes, which have then been rated for their impact on therapeutic choices. Only outcomes classified as “critical” and “important” have been considered in the systematic review of evidence and only those classified as “critical” have been considered in the formulation of recommendations. Results: The present GL provides recommendations regarding the role of pharmacological and neurosurgical treatment in the management of prolactinomas. We recommend cabergoline (Cab) vs. bromocriptine (Br) as the first-choice pharmacological treatment to be employed at the minimal effective dose capable of achieving the regression of the clinical picture. We suggest that medication and surgery are offered as suitable alternative first-line treatments to patients with non-invasive PRL-secreting adenoma, regardless of size. We suggest Br as an alternative drug in patients who are intolerant to Cab and are not candidates for surgery. We recommend pituitary tumor resection in patients 1) without any significant neuro-ophthalmologic improvement within two weeks from the start of Cab, 2) who are resistant or do not tolerate Cab or other dopamine-agonist drugs (DA), 3) who escape from previous efficacy of DA, and 4) who are unwilling to undergo a chronic DA treatment. We recommend that patients with progressive disease notwithstanding previous tumor resection and ongoing DA should be managed by a multidisciplinary team with specific expertise in pituitary diseases using a multimodal approach that includes repeated surgery, radiotherapy, DA, and possibly, the use of temozolomide. Conclusion: The present GL is directed to endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, and gynecologists working in hospitals, in territorial services or private practice, and to general practitioners and patients.

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A pajzsmirigy-alulműködés gyakori betegség. Kezelésében a levotiroxin (LT4)-pótlás a szokásos eljárás, mely tabletta vagy gélkapszula formájában áll rendelkezésre Magyarországon. A nemzetközi trendeknek megfelelően az esetek korai felismerése miatt már a kevésbé kifejezett hormonális eltérések idején elindul a kezelés. Az endokrinológusok hypothyreosiskezelési szokásaival kapcsolatban Magyarországon és Európában felmérés eddig nem történt. Célkitűzés: A THESIS (Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: an International Survey) célja, hogy felmérjük az európai és közte jelen munkánkban a magyar endokrinológusok hypothyreosiskezelési szokásait és az LT4 esetleges alkalmazását pajzsmirigy-működészavarral nem járó állapotokban. Módszer: A Magyar Endokrinológiai és Anyagcsere Társaság (MEAT) tagjainak e-mailben meghívót küldtünk az online kérdőíves vizsgálathoz. Eredmények: 165 magyar endokrinológus válaszai alapján végeztük az elemzést. A válaszadók többsége, 99,4%-uk első kezelésként LT4-pótlást alkalmaz. Az LT4 + LT3 kombinációt elsősorban olyan betegeknél alkalmazzák, akik LT4 szedése mellett euthyreoid hormonértékek ellenére hypothyreosisra jellemző tüneteket mutatnak (36,1%). Euthyreoid hormonértékek mellett, magas antitestszint és infertilitás esetén 60,3% megfontolná LT4 indítását, amit evidenciák jelenleg nem indokolnak. Számos kórállapot befolyásolja az LT4 felszívódását, ezekben az esetekben a magyar endokrinológusok 66,4%-a preferálja a lágy kapszula alkalmazását, jobb eredményt várva a gyógyszerformák közötti váltástól. Következtetés: A pajzsmirigy-alulműködés kezelésében a magyar endokrinológusok elsődlegesen az LT4-et választják. Az LT4 + LT3 kombinált alkalmazását a pajzsmirigy-stimuláló hormon normális szintjének elérése után perzisztáló hypothyreosisos tünetek esetén fontolják meg. Az újabb gyógyszerformákat a többség preferálja, ha az LT4 hagyományos tablettás formájának alacsonyabb biohasznosulása várható. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(12): 463–472. Summary. Introduction: Hypothyroidism has a high prevalence in the adult population. Levothyroxine (LT4) supplementation is considered to be the gold-standard treatment method. In Hungary, LT4 tablets and soft gel capsules are the available formulations. Similarly to the international trends, hypothyroidism is earlier recognised, leading to early LT4 supplementation. Up till now, there has been no survey on the treatment of hypothyroidism among Hungarian endocrinologists. Objective: THESIS (Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: an International Survey) had been conducted to assess treatment preferences among European endocrinologists. Here we report the results on the use of thyroid hormones in hypothyroid patients and euthyroid individuals in Hungary. Method: An e-mail invitation to participate, containing the link to the online survey was sent to members of the Hungarian Society for Endocrinology and Metabolism. Results: There were 165 responses with full demographics which were included in the analysis. By the majority (99.4%) of them, LT4 was the first treatment of choice. LT4 + LT3 combination was considered an option in patients with persistent symptoms despite biochemical euthyroidism while on LT4 (36,1%). In euthyroid individuals, 60.3% of the respondents would consider starting LT4 in euthyroid infertile women with high antibody levels, which is hardly supported by evidence. In the presence of comorbidities and interfering medications which may hinder LT4 absorption, 66.4% of Hungarian endocrinologist anticipate significant improvement after switching from tablets to soft gel capsules. Conclusion: The treatment of choice for hypothyroidism is LT4 in Hungary. Combination therapy with LT4 + LT3 was considered for patients with persistent symptoms. In the presence of diseases and interfering medications affecting bioavailability, a high number of Hungarian endocrinologists prefer the new LT4 formulation. The administration of LT4 in euthyroid conditions awaits explanation and calls for intensive discussions at local conferences and courses. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(12): 463–472.

Background: Direct locoregional treatments were recently proposed for the local control of cervical and distant metastasis of thyroid cancer, but data on their use as part of a multimodality approach for primary thyroid tumors are poor. In this feasibility study, laser ablation (LTA) was successfully used for the initial debulking of unresectable radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer in sequential therapy with Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors (TKI). Case Presentation: A 69-year-old woman underwent partial resection of papillary thyroid cancer with extensive tracheal infiltration. Post-treatment whole-body scan (131I, 8140 MBq) showed the absence of cervical thyroid uptake. The patient experienced a rapid increase in her cervical mass associated with dysphonia, dyspnea, and dysphagia. Due to a concomitant severe hypertensive state and cardiac failure, the patient was treated with LTA after a multidisciplinary consultation. After local anesthesia, two 300 nm optic fibers were inserted into the lesion through 21G spinal needles. Two illuminations with 4-watt output power and 3600 Joules energy delivery were performed with a diode-laser source. LTA resulted in rapid cancer debulking, and mass volume decreased from 23.9 to 7.5 mL resulting in significant improvement of pressure symptoms. Three months later, the patient was started on lenvatinib due to the initial regrowth of the tumor mass. The cervical tumor burden was controlled by TKI for 20 months when a rapid disease progression occurred, and the patient died. Discussion: Locally advanced, unresectable, and radioiodine-refractory thyroid tumors can be managed with a novel multimodality approach. The initial debulking with LTA of the locally aggressive disease results in rapid control of the tumor burden threatening patients’ life and is effectively followed by long-term control with TKI treatment. Conclusion: Based on this experience, sequential multimodality treatment with an initial locally directed laser ablation procedure followed by TKI therapy may be considered as a salvage option in patients with unresectable and rapidly progressive RR thyroid tumors.

International audience; Aim: To describe practices of French physicians regarding thyroid hormone therapy, focusing on available LT4 formulations.Material and methods: Members of the French Endocrine Society (FES) and affiliated societies (the Endocrine Tumor Group, French College of Teachers of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases and the Union of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition Specialists) were invited to participate in an online survey.Results: 534 of the 2,094 persons contacted (25.5%) completed the survey and were included in the analysis. The vast majority (99.4%) reported that levothyroxine (LT4) is the treatment of choice for hypothyroidism. 7.1% and 14.2% of respondents respectively considered liothyronine (LT3) or a combination of LT4 and LT3 for the treatment of hypothyroidism, mainly when symptoms persisted despite achieving normal TSH concentrations with LT4 therapy. For 44% of respondents, thyroid hormone treatment is never indicated in euthyroid patients, while the remainder would consider treating euthyroid patients with a goiter growing over time (40.2%) and/or euthyroid women with positive anti-TPO antibodies and infertility (31.7%). LT4 tablets were the preferred LT4 formulation. A significant proportion of FES members expected no major clinical differences upon changing to formulations such as soft-gel capsules or liquid solutions, even in specific scenarios such as poor biochemical control or suspicion of malabsorption.Conclusion: The treatment of choice for hypothyroidism in France is LT4. LT3-based therapy is considered by some physicians in case of persistent symptoms of hypothyroidism despite normal TSH level. A significant proportion of respondents (66.0%) would consider treating euthyroid patients, contrary to the present state of knowledge. These outdated practices should be addressed by professional bodies such as the FES.; Objectifs: Décrire les pratiques des médecins français concernant l’utilisation thérapeutique des hormones thyroïdiennes, et notamment des formes galéniques disponibles pour la lévothyroxine (LT4).Matériel et méthodes: Les membres de la Société Française d’Endocrinologie (SFE) et de ses sociétés affiliées (le Groupe d’Etudes des Tumeurs Endocrines, le Collège des Enseignants en Endocrinologie, Diabétologie et Maladies Métaboliques et le Syndicat des médecins spécialistes en Endocrinologie, Diabétologie, Maladies Métaboliques et Nutrition) ont été invités à participer à un sondage en ligne.Résultats: Parmi les 2094 personnes contactées, 534 (25,5%) ont répondu et ont été inclus dans l’étude. Selon une très grande majorité d’entre eux (99,4%) la lévothyroxine (LT4) serait le traitement de choix pour l’hypothyroïdie. Respectivement 7,1% et 14,2% envisageraient d’utiliser la liothyronine (LT3) ou l’association de LT4 et LT3 pour l’hypothyroïdie, surtout en cas de symptômes persistants malgré un taux normal de TSH après traitement par LT4. Pour 44% des sondés, les traitements par hormones thyroïdiennes ne sont jamais indiqués pour les patients euthyroïdiens, alors que les autres pourraient éventuellement traiter un patient euthyroïdien avec goitre progressif (40,2%) et / ou une patiente euthyroïdienne infertile et positive pour le anticorps anti-TPO (31,7%). La forme galénique préférée pour la LT4 était sous forme de cachets. Un pourcentage important des membres de la SFE n’anticipait aucune différence clinique majeur si cette forme est remplacée, par exemple, par des capsules de gel mou ou par une solution liquide, même dans des cas spécifiques comme d’absence de contrôle biologique ou de soupçon de malabsorption.Conclusion: Le traitement de choix pour l’hypothyroïdie en France est la LT4. Certains confrères utilisent la LT3 en cas de symptômes persistants d’hypothyroïdie malgré un taux de TSH normal. Selon un pourcentage important des sondés (66.0%), il serait envisageable de mettre en place des traitements pour les patients euthyroïdiens, ce qui ne correspond pas à l’état actuel des connaissances. Les instances professionnelles comme la SFE devraient s’adresser à ces pratiques désuètes.

Introduction/Objective. Hypothyroidism is a common disease and treatment with levothyroxine (LT4) is effective. However, variations in management are frequent. The aim of this study was to identify practices and attitudes of Serbian physicians relating to the treatment of hypothyroidism. Methods. An anonymized questionnaire was distributed electronically to members of the Serbian Thyroid Society, Serbian Association of Endocrine Surgeons, and Section for Endocrinology of the Serbian Medical Society. Results. Out of 170 invitations, 99 responses were received. LT4 was the first choice for the treatment of hypothyroidism in 90% of patients. After starting LT4 replacement therapy most respondents would recheck thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in 4?6 weeks (n = 51, 62%) and in eight weeks (n = 29, 35%). In total, 61% of respondents (n = 60) indicated that they would consider treating euthyroid patients with LT4, the commonest indication being female infertility with high levels of thyroid antibodies (54%, n = 50). More than half respondents (58%, n = 45) would recommend combined LT4 + LT3 therapy for patients on LT4 with normal serum TSH who still complain of symptoms of hypothyroidism. 53% (n = 41/77), reported that the frequency of patients with normal serum TSH who still complain of hypothyroid symptoms is less than 5%. Conclusion. LT4 was the first choice of therapy for the treatment of hypothyroid patients, whereas LT3 + LT4 combination treatment is considered in patients with persistent symptoms of hypothyroidism despite normalization of TSH. The most common indication for thyroid hormone treatment in euthyroid patients was female infertility with high levels of thyroid antibodies. Alternative LT4 formulations like liquid solution or soft-gel capsules ?formulations presently not available in Serbia, were largely reserved for specific conditions (interfering drugs, malabsorption, inability to take LT4 in the fasting state, unexplained poor biochemical control of hypothyroidism).

BackgroundReplacement of thyroid hormones (TH) with Levothyroxine (LT4) is the treatment of choice for hypothyroidism, however, there are aspects of treatment where uncertainties exist and practice varies. Factors influencing initiation and choice of TH replacement may impact patient satisfaction, safety, and health care costs.MethodsThe aim of the study was to examine the attitudes of Irish endocrinologists regarding the treatment of hypothyroid and euthyroid patients with TH. Members of the Irish Endocrine Society (IES) were invited to participate in an online survey.ResultsForty-eight invitations were sent, and 39 (81.3%) participants responded. All respondents favoured LT4 tablet therapy for treatment of hypothyroidism, but 20.5% prescribed combination therapy (LT4 and liothyronine), and 13% regularly used desiccated thyroid extract. A significant proportion (51%) might prescribe TH in euthyroid patients; 41% for thyroid auto-antibody positive women seeking pregnancy, 18% for goitre and 5% for unexplained fatigue. Many (38%) consider combination therapy in patients with persistent symptoms. Respondents reported seeing LT4 treated patients with persistent symptomatology more frequently and perceive psychosocial factors and comorbidities to be the most common reasons for such symptoms.ConclusionLT4 tablets are the treatment of choice for hypothyroidism in Ireland. Approximately a third of Irish endocrinologists either regularly use, or would consider, liothyronine for hypothyroid patients. A significant proportion would give TH to euthyroid individuals in specific circumstances. The prescription of TH amongst Irish endocrinologists was generally in keeping with recommended practice, and areas where practice deviated from guidance were typically where evidence was conflicting or insufficient.

Background Inconsistencies in the management of hypothyroidism have been reported among endocrinologists in different European countries. Aim of this study was to explore Czech endocrinologists’ use of thyroid hormones in hypothyroid and euthyroid patients. Methods We used a web-based survey containing 32 questions regarding the use of thyroid hormones. Four-hundred thirty-two members of the Czech Society of Endocrinology received an e-mail invitation to participate in the survey. Results We received and analysed 157 responses (112 females and 45 males) from the 432 members (36.3%). According to 99.4% of the respondents, levothyroxine (LT4) is the primary drug of choice for the treatment of hypothyroidism. Liothyronine (LT3) was used in clinical practice by 29.9% of responders. According to 90.5% of respondents, thyroid hormones may be indicated in biochemically euthyroid patients. Female physicians prescribe thyroid hormones in euthyroid infertile women with high antibody levels more frequently than male physicians (P = 0.003). Most Czech endocrinologists (76.4%) consider combined therapy with LT4 and LT3 in various clinical scenarios, but only 1 of 29 hypothyroid physicians (3.5%) would recommend it to their patients, and only 4 out of 128 respondents (3.1%) would consider LT3 or desiccated thyroid for themselves, if diagnosed with hypothyroidism. Conclusion LT4 is the primary thyroid hormone used in the Czech Republic for treatment of hypothyroidism. At variance with thyroid guideline recommendations, Czech endocrinologists are quite liberal when prescribing thyroid hormones to euthyroid patients and in the use of LT4/LT3 combination treatment for hypothyroid patients with persisting symptoms.

To report the results of a multicenter retrospective evaluation of the clinical outcomes of thermal ablation (TA) in a large series of autonomously functioning thyroid nodules (AFTN) with a follow-up protracted up to 3 years.Patients treated with single TA for an AFTN in Italy were included. Changes in nodule volume, TSH values, and ongoing anti-thyroid therapy were assessed at the 2-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up controls. Complications and need of any additional therapy after TA were also registered.A total of 361 patients (244 females, 117 males, median age 58 years, IQR 46-70 years) were included. Nodule volume was significantly reduced at all time points (p 0.001) (median volume reduction 58% at 6-month and 60% at 12-month). Serum TSH values increased significantly at all time points. After TA, anti-thyroid therapy was withdrawn in 32.5% of patients at 2 months, in 38.9% at 6 months, and in 41.3% at 12 months. A significant difference in the rate of patients who withdrawn medical therapy at 12 months was registered between small ( 10 mL) (74%), medium (49%), or large ( 30 mL) nodules (19%). A single major complication occurred (0.25%). Additional treatments were needed in 34/361 (9.4%) of cases including 4 (1.1%) surgical treatment.Image-guided thermal ablation offers a further safe and effective therapeutic option in patients with AFTN. Clinical outcomes are significantly more favorable in small than in large size AFTN.• Thermal ablations (TA) can be safely and effectively used in patients with autonomously functioning thyroid nodules (AFTN). • TA results in a clinically significant nodule volume reduction that is paralleled by TSH level normalization and anti-thyroid drug therapy discontinuation (after TA anti-thyroid therapy was withdrawn in 41.3% at 12 months). • Clinical outcomes after TA are more favorable in small nodules, and when a large amount of thyroid nodule tissue is ablated.

Introduction : Over the past several years new evidence on the management of hypothyroidism has emerged, which has influenced recommendations from professional bodies. The presentation of hypothyroid patients has also changed, and new cases are increasingly diagnosed by indiscriminate screening, often identifying cases with minor biochemical disturbances. Little is known about the physician responses and attitudes to this changing landscape. THESIS (Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: an International Survey) is a large-scale survey of European physicians who treat patients with hypothyroidism. Here we document current practices of Polish physicians relating to the use of thyroid hormones in hypothyroid and euthyroid patients. Material and methods: Members of the Polish Society of Endocrinology were invited to participate in the web-based THESIS survey. Results: In total 423 (54.6% of the 774 invited) physicians completed the survey. The majority of respondents (74.2%) would prescribe thyroid hormones for euthyroid patients for certain indications, such as female infertility with elevated thyroid antibodies (63.4%), simple goitre (40.9%), unexplained fatigue (12.1%), obesity (9.7%), hypercholesterolaemia (9.0%), and depression (9.2%). Nearly all physicians (96.0%) declared that the treatment of choice for hypothyroidism is levothyroxine (LT4). However, around one-third (30.3%) were also using LT4 and liothyronine (LT3) combination treatment; LT3 alone was rarely prescribed (1.7%), and none prescribed desiccated thyroid extract. The majority of respondents preferred LT4 tablets. Among alternative formulations, liquid LT4 was most commonly recommended for patients unable to take LT4 in the fasting state (26.0%) and patients with malabsorption (19.9%). Respondents considered prescribing dietary supplements (such as selenium and iodine) in hypothyroid patients with coexisting autoimmune thyroiditis (29.6%) or at the patients’ request (32.2%). LT4 + LT3 combination therapy was used by 32.2% when symptoms persisted notwithstanding normal serum TSH concentration. Psychosocial factors, comorbidities, and the burden of chronic disease were considered as the most likely causes of persistent symptoms. Conclusions: Apart from clinical practice recommendations, other factors influence the thyroid hormone therapy patterns. Moreover, certain areas of clinical practice were identified (the use of thyroid hormones in euthyroid subjects and the use of dietary supplements), which are not in accordance with the current evidence.

Management of hypothyroidism is controversial because of medication cost pressures and scientific uncertainty on how to address treatment dissatisfaction experienced by some patients. The objective was to investigate the experience and preferences of UK endocrinologists in use of thyroid hormones.Web-based survey.UK endocrinologists were invited to participate.Responses to questionnaire.The response rate was 21% (272/1295). While levothyroxine monotherapy is regarded as the treatment of choice for hypothyroidism, 51% of respondents stated that combined treatment with levothyroxine and liothyronine could be considered for levothyroxine-treated patients whose symptoms persist despite normalisation of serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration. However, only 40% are currently prescribing such treatment, and just 23% would consider taking it themselves. A small minority prescribe desiccated thyroid extract, and those most likely to do so are aged over 60 years. Most respondents stated that they have no influence over brand or formulation of levothyroxine dispensed to their patients and expect no major differences in efficacy between different formulations. A total of 9% would prescribe levothyroxine for euthyroid enlarging goitre, and 29% for euthyroid female infertility with high titre thyroid peroxidase antibodies, despite recent trials finding no benefit.UK endocrine practice in management of hypothyroidism is broadly in line with international guidance. However, a minority of respondents would consider thyroid hormone supplementation in euthyroid individuals for female infertility, enlarging goitre, and other indications in which evidence of efficacy is lacking. Willingness to consider prescribing combined levothyroxine and liothyronine, for hypothyroid symptoms which persist despite normalised TSH, has increased in comparison to previous international surveys, despite inconsistent evidence of benefit.

Purpose The standard treatment of hypothyroidism is levothyroxine (LT4), which is available as tablets or soft-gel capsules in Denmark. This study aimed to investigate Danish endocrinologists’ use of thyroid hormones in hypothyroid and euthyroid patients. Methods An e-mail with an invitation to participate in an online survey investigating practices about substitution with thyroid hormones was sent to all members of the Danish Endocrine Society (DES). Results Out of 488 eligible DES members, a total of 152 (31.2%) respondents were included in the analysis. The majority (94.1%) of responding DES members use LT4 as the treatment of choice. Other treatment options for hypothyroidism are also used, as 58.6% prescribe combination therapy with liothyronine (LT3) + LT4 in their clinical practice. LT4 + LT3 combination is preferred in patients with persistent symptoms of hypothyroidism despite biochemical euthyroidism on LT4 treatment. Over half of the respondents answered that thyroid hormone therapy is never indicated for euthyroid patients, but 42.1% will consider it for euthyroid infertile women with high antibody levels. In various conditions that could interfere with the absorption of LT4, most responding Danish endocrinologists prefer tablets and do not expect a significant difference when switching from one type of tablet formulation to another. Conclusion The treatment of choice for hypothyroidism is LT4. Combination therapy with LT4 + LT3 is considered for patients with persistent symptoms. Even in the presence of conditions affecting bioavailability, responding Danish endocrinologists prefer LT4 tablets rather than newer LT4 formulations, such as soft-gel capsules. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40618-021-01555-y.

Background: Thyroid nodule image reporting and data systems (TIRADS) provide the indications for fine-needle aspiration (FNA) based on a combination of nodule sonographic features and size. We compared the TIRADS-based recommendations for FNA with those based on the personal expertise of qualified US investigators in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy. Methods: Seven highly experienced ultrasound (US) investigators from 4 countries evaluated, online, the US video recordings of 123 histologically verified thyroid nodules. Technical resources provided the operators with a diagnostic approach close to the real-world practice. Altogether, 4,305 TIRADS scores were computed. The combined diagnostic potential of TIRADS (TIRSYS) and the personal recommendations of the investigators (PERS) were compared against 3 possible goals: to recognize all malignant lesions (allCA), nonpapillary plus non-pT1 papillary cancers (nPnT1PCA), or stage II-IV cancers (st2-4CA). Results: For allCA and nPnT1PCA, TIRSYS had lower sensitivity than PERS (69.8 vs. 87.2 and 83.5 vs. 92.6%, respectively, p <0.01), while in st2-4CA the sensitivities were the same (99.1 vs. 98.6% and TIRSYS vs. PERS, respectively). TIRSYS had a higher specificity than PERS in all 3 types of cancers (p < 0.001). PERS recommended FNA in a similar proportion of lesions smaller or larger than 1 cm (76.9 vs. 82.7%; ns). Conclusions: Recommendations for FNA based on the investigators’ US expertise demonstrated a better sensitivity for thyroid cancer in the 2 best prognostic groups, while TIRADS methodology showed superior specificity over the full prognostic range of cancers. Thus, personal experience provided more accurate diagnoses of malignancy, missing a lower number of small thyroid cancers, but the TIRADS approach resulted in a similar accuracy for the diagnosis of potentially aggressive lesions while sparing a relevant number of FNAs. Until it is not clearly stated what the goal of the US evaluation is, that is to diagnose all or only clinically relevant thyroid cancers, it cannot be determined whether one diagnostic approach is superior to the other for recommending FNA.

Classification schemes for reporting thyroid cytology of fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules are largely used in clinical practice, but the level of inter-observer agreement among cytopathologists is poorly acknowledged. The present study aimed to explore the inter-observer agreement among the experienced authors of the 2014 Italian Consensus for Classification and Reporting of Thyroid Cytology (ICCRTC). A stratified randomization was performed in order to obtain a sample homogeneously distributed and representative of all ICCRTC classes. Four high-experience raters were randomly selected among the extensors of the Italian consensus. They independently reviewed 60 FNA samples blindly of the initial cytological report and clinical features. Their overall agreement was evaluated according to Fleiss' kappa. The overall inter-observer agreement was moderate (κ 0.46). Specifically, a good agreement was found when the samples were consistent for malignancy (TIR5) or were not adequate for diagnosis (TIR1) (κ 0.67 and κ 0.73, respectively). A moderate agreement was present for suspicious-for-malignant category (TIR4), and a fair agreement was recorded in the two intermediate ones (TIR3A and TIR3B) (κ 0.36 and κ 0.35, respectively). For clinical purposes, the agreement was good (κ 0.74) in differentiating cases with surgical indication (TIR4/TIR5) from those in which surgery is not essential or requires limited extension (TIR3B/TIR3A/TIR2). In conclusion, the present study confirms the reliability of ICCRTC. These data represent a reference for cytopathologists using this system and are useful for the practice of clinicians and surgeons.

The increased frequency of thyroid nodules is paralleled by the rise of thyroid cancer diagnosis. To define the nature of most thyroid nodules, fine needle aspiration (FNA) followed by cytological evaluation is considered the method of choice. About 20% of FNA biopsies on thyroid nodules, however, show indeterminate cytological features and may require diagnostic surgery. Several immunocytochemical and molecular markers have been proposed to improve classification of thyroid nodules, but these tests require adequate cell amount and cytological paraffin inclusion. Polymeric matrices were recently proposed for the collection of cells for diagnostic purposes. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic use of a new matrix (CytoMatrix). Morphological, molecular and immunohistochemical investigations were carried out on 23 FNA samples included in CytoMatrix and compared with data obtained from the definitive histology of surgical samples. Our results showed that CytoMatrix is suitable to capture and preserve the cellularity of the samples harvested by FNA and that its paraffin sections mimic the morphology of those obtained from real histological tissue. Immunohistochemistry on CytoMatrix samples was consistent with the immunophenotypical profile of the corresponding histological surgical specimens. Mutational analysis of the BRAF (V600E) gene performed on CytoMatrix inclusions and paired surgical tissue matched in all but one cases while matrix immunohistochemistry identified 91.6% of BRAF mutated samples. In conclusion, we suggest that CytoMatrix could be a reliable tool to overcome the current limits of traditional collection methods for the study of thyroid cytology, thereby improving their reliability for a conclusive diagnostic interpretation.

Carcinomas of the thyroid with Ewing family tumor elements (CEFTEs) are small cell thyroid tumors characterized by epithelial differentiation and EWSR1-FLI1 rearrangements. In contrast to primary thyroid Ewing sarcomas, these rare tumors have a favorable prognosis. CEFTEs may co-exist with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) foci and are thought to arise from either PTCs or main cells of solid cell nests (SCN). Due to their rare occurrence, characteristic clinical presentations, preoperatory sonographic (US) findings, and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytologic features were ill-defined until now. We report a case of a 40-year-old male who was referred to the thyroid clinic for a progressively enlarging, hard, painless, cervical mass. US examination revealed a hypoechoic nodule with lobulated margins and scant intranodular vascular signals of the right thyroid lobe. Evidence of extracapsular spread was not identified. FNA provided a Bethesda V cytology classification on conventional smears. Repeat FNA sampling with the use of a CytoFoam Core allowed a preoperative diagnosis consistent with undifferentiated thyroid carcinoma. Total thyroidectomy without lymph node dissection was performed. Histologic examination with subsequent molecular studies provided the diagnosis of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid with Ewing family tumour elements (CEFTEs). No additional treatment was rendered and the patient showed no evidence of local or distant disease by clinical examination, US, and (18)FDG-TAC/PET after 6 months of follow-up. This is the first reported case of CEFTE with complete clinical, US, cytologic, and immunohistochemical preoperatory assessment.